History of the entire world

[TSA321]

 

[gazza619]

The guy who made the video was clearly an athiest. He has presented some facts mixed with his own fiction. The problem is that when we humans try to explain God we fail miserably.

 

[PetroDollars]

read 'sapiens' by yuval noah harari for a history of the world, best book ever.

 

[gazza619]

read 'sapiens' by yuval noah harari for a history of the world, best book ever.

Thanks. Is this available to download as an e-read?

 

[PetroDollars]

you can get it on kindle

 

[TSA321]

read 'sapiens' by yuval noah harari for a history of the world, best book ever.

I've seen a lot of people reading that on the train. May get it myself.

 

[Adijazz1706]

read 'sapiens' by yuval noah harari for a history of the world, best book ever.

There is no unbiased history book so not sure this'll be any different. The video above is good enough from an atheist, we don't need another atheist viewpoint, particularly a hypocritical atheist who lives on land 'promised to the Jews by God', the God he doesn't believe in

 

[Madplayer]

Thanks. Is this available to download as an e-read?

I have its e-book. I could e-mail you if you want haha

 

[Madplayer]

There is no unbiased history book so not sure this'll be any different. The video above is good enough from an atheist, we don't need another atheist viewpoint, particularly a hypocritical atheist who lives on land 'promised to the Jews by God', the God he doesn't believe in

Yes. All books have some biases. i have not finished reading Sapiens yet, but whatever i have read so far, it presents the evolutionist version of history.

 

[Madplayer]

I have its e-book. I could e-mail you if you want haha

Did you receive my message?

 

[CricketCartoons]

read 'sapiens' by yuval noah harari for a history of the world, best book ever.

LOL at "best book ever". Hardly original and reads like a blog. but such pop corn history books are popular with millennials who rarely read books but when they pick one they term it the best one ever. The details are more complex than the author puts it. the author is extremely repetitive and self assured to the core. good for chatter, not scholarly enough to deserve discussion.

 

[PetroDollars]

There is no unbiased history book so not sure this'll be any different. The video above is good enough from an atheist, we don't need another atheist viewpoint, particularly a hypocritical atheist who lives on land 'promised to the Jews by God', the God he doesn't believe in

there are biases everywhere, thats why i will take facts and evidence over myths and fairytales anyday.

 

[PetroDollars]

LOL at "best book ever". Hardly original and reads like a blog. but such pop corn history books are popular with millennials who rarely read books but when they pick one they term it the best one ever. The details are more complex than the author puts it. the author is extremely repetitive and self assured to the core. good for chatter, not scholarly enough to deserve discussion.

how do you make an original history book?

does that make sense, even religous and holy books sent by the gods arnt original.

ofcourse one would like to bring out the worse excuses when he just doesnt agree with something.

 

[Adijazz1706]

there are biases everywhere, thats why i will take facts and evidence over myths and fairytales anyday.

I wouldn't take 'facts and evidence' from history which is particularly prone to being written from the POV of the dominant culture/race/nation/religion etc. His hypocrisy is a verified fact though, make of it what you will

 

[CricketCartoons]

how do you make an original history book?

does that make sense, even religous and holy books sent by the gods arnt original.

ofcourse one would like to bring out the worse excuses when he just doesnt agree with something.

sapiens doesn't count as a serious history book...it is for lazy minds. I meant his opinions were not original and were repetitive. Which books did you read before deciding this is the best book ever?

 

[PetroDollars]

I wouldn't take 'facts and evidence' from history which is particularly prone to being written from the POV of the dominant culture/race/nation/religion etc. His hypocrisy is a verified fact though, make of it what you will

facts and evidence are not prone to anything, they are facts, simple as that. Wheather you agree with them or not, facts would not change so you are entitled to belive what you want.

As for his hypocrisy, can you expand on it and say something further rather then repeating yourself with one word in every post. what excatly makes him a hypocrite?

 

[PetroDollars]

sapiens doesn't count as a serious history book...it is for lazy minds. I meant his opinions were not original and were repetitive. Which books did you read before deciding this is the best book ever?

Lazy minds? lol, lazy minds dont read blogs let alone books.

As for his opinions and theories there are more originals ones in here than in many other history books.

just two are his theories on imaginative orders and dataism from the second part.

i have read books by jared diamond and some will durant on history and those are very repetitive.
there can be some diagreements on spaiens but repetitive it is not.

 

[Adijazz1706]

facts and evidence are not prone to anything, they are facts, simple as that. Wheather you agree with them or not, facts would not change so you are entitled to belive what you want.

As for his hypocrisy, can you expand on it and say something further rather then repeating yourself with one word in every post. what excatly makes him a hypocrite?

He is a hypocritical atheist who lives on land 'promised to the Jews by God', the God he doesn't believe in. Do read posts you're responded to

 

[PetroDollars]

He is a hypocritical atheist who lives on land 'promised to the Jews by God', the God he doesn't believe in. Do read posts you're responded to

what are you 5 years old?

so you belive someone is a hypocrite because of the country they are from

The only hypocrite you are proving is yourself.

 

[Adijazz1706]

what are you 5 years old?

so you belive someone is a hypocrite because of the country they are from

The only hypocrite you are proving is yourself.

If I live on land and claim ut was given to me by God while simultaneously saying I don't believe in God, that clearly makes me a hypocrite. Simples

 

[Bilal_103]

I was excited about reading this book and had expectations that it would give a good scientific account of the biological and social evolution of humans through time. What I got instead was a shallow, uninformed politically motivated book full of unsubstantiated claims about humanity. I couldn't even read it all because I got incredibly fed up of the authors moralising on natural human behavior and politically motivated comments. It became very very clear to me that the book was written by a historian rather than a legitimate scientist who knew what they were talking about. I'm not interested in people's opinions, on matters of fact. Serious claims need to be substantiated with significant evidence and the author provides none of that. I liked some aspects of it but idk it didn't resonate to me.