What's new

How would you describe the worst person on Earth?

Rayyman

Rayyman

Test Debutant
Joined
May 5, 2014
Runs
15,182
If there somebody who was the worst guy on the planet? What would he be like and what would he do?
 
Someone along the lines of Munnawar Hasan, Sami ul Haq, the Westboro Baptist folk, Malik Ishaq or the Yogi Adityanaths of the world. Evil men commit evil, its a given, but nothing makes good men commit evil so willingly as religious conviction so as far as I'm concerned, having strong religious convictions is a massive red flag.
 
Rayyman said:
Hate those people too. Lowest of the low.

I hope some rich guys make a mafia and destroy all these people.
Click to expand...


They had probably been molested in turn when they were kids and grew up thinking it is normal.

Some can be reformed, using psychotherapy.
 
Narendra Damodardas Modi.

- Following the footsteps of Hitler.
- Subscribes and actively promotes an extreme terrorist Right-Wing ideology – Hindutva.
- Intolerance at every level, epitomised.
- Complete disregard for women (abandoning his wife).
- Believes animals have more rights than humans.
- Single handedly endorses cow vigilantism.
- Hate Speeches.
- Scorned by foreign governments, such as the Italians.
- Black money apologist.
- Blood on his hands.
- Banned by foreign governments from entering foreign soil.

Evil is not just through action, but through thought too.

Modi is Lucifer at every level.
 
R3verse Swing said:
Narendra Damodardas Modi.

- Following the footsteps of Hitler.
- Subscribes and actively promotes an extreme terrorist Right-Wing ideology – Hindutva.
- Intolerance at every level, epitomised.
- Complete disregard for women (abandoning his wife).
- Believes animals have more rights than humans.
- Single handedly endorses cow vigilantism.
- Hate Speeches.
- Scorned by foreign governments, such as the Italians.
- Black money apologist.
- Blood on his hands.
- Banned by foreign governments from entering foreign soil.

Evil is not just through action, but through thought too.

Modi is Lucifer at every level.
Click to expand...

Now I am a die hard Modi fan. I liked him, now I love him.
 
Rayyman said:
Hate those people too. Lowest of the low.

I hope some rich guys make a mafia and destroy all these people.
Click to expand...

Many rich guys are involved in performing or peddling this filth as they feel they can get away with it due to their money and power. I have personally witnessed (not the act itself but the whole process) and have direct accounts from people who have witnessed many rich and powerful people who are perceived as saints of doing such things and much worse behind closed doors.
 
People who commit sexual offences to children make my blood boil. Disgusting humans.
 
DeadBall said:
Many rich guys are involved in performing or peddling this filth as they feel they can get away with it due to their money and power. I have personally witnessed (not the act itself but the whole process) and have direct accounts from people who have witnessed many rich and powerful people who are perceived as saints of doing such things and much worse behind closed doors.
Click to expand...
People with wealth need to help stop such evil individuals.
 
DeadBall said:
Many rich guys are involved in performing or peddling this filth as they feel they can get away with it due to their money and power. I have personally witnessed (not the act itself but the whole process) and have direct accounts from people who have witnessed many rich and powerful people who are perceived as saints of doing such things and much worse behind closed doors.
Click to expand...

Is this in Pakistan?
 
R3verse Swing said:
Narendra Damodardas Modi.

- Following the footsteps of Hitler.
- Subscribes and actively promotes an extreme terrorist Right-Wing ideology – Hindutva.
- Intolerance at every level, epitomised.
- Complete disregard for women (abandoning his wife).
- Believes animals have more rights than humans.
- Single handedly endorses cow vigilantism.
- Hate Speeches.
- Scorned by foreign governments, such as the Italians.
- Black money apologist.
- Blood on his hands.
- Banned by foreign governments from entering foreign soil.

Evil is not just through action, but through thought too.

Modi is Lucifer at every level.
Click to expand...

modi more scary than Stalin /Genghis khan/Pol Pot ?
 
Hitman said:
How anyone can molest a child is beyond me.
Click to expand...

You won't believe how disgusting and pathetic people can be . Why do you think child pornography thrives despite central agencies of so many countries continue to crack down upon the perpetrators? Deep web is full of this sh*t.
 
good guy said:
modi more scary than Stalin /Genghis khan/Pol Pot ?
Click to expand...

Evil not scary. However it is all subjective, I doubt either Stalin/Pol Pot/Idi Amin/Hitler etc have personally affected him or his opinions personally.
 
People who hurt children or the elderly are evil.

The most evil are those who have the power to destroy whole nations, kill women and children by the thousands or millions.

Obama, Blair, Bush, Trump, Modi, Saudis, Netanyahoo, Bashar,.
 
KingKhanWC said:
People who hurt children or the elderly are evil.

The most evil are those who have the power to destroy whole nations, kill women and children by the thousands or millions.

Obama, Blair, Bush, Trump, Modi, Saudis, Netanyahoo, Bashar,.
Click to expand...

Those people all have manners though. They say please, thank you, etc. What about somebody who is just a complete savage.
 
Rayyman said:
Those people all have manners though. They say please, thank you, etc. What about somebody who is just a complete savage.
Click to expand...

This makes them even more evil. There is a saying, something like 'the greatest trick of the devil is making you think he doesn't exist'. Leaders of today, from allsorts of backgrounds are the most evil people in the world imo.
 
good guy said:
modi more scary than Stalin /Genghis khan/Pol Pot ?
Click to expand...

Stalin has been dead for 65 years yet even now I get a chill down my spine just looking at the man's photo and reading into what he did.

He was a common thug who was elevated to one of the most powerful men in the world in the 20th Century with millions of lives in the palm of the hand. He had an insatiable appetite for hard work and was extremely intelligent, able to quickly grasp complex issues but almost incapable of compassion or sympathy towards his opponents.

His own son tried to commit suicide by shooting himself, after years of bullying by his father, but failed which prompted Stalin not to show any sympathy but to criticise his son's aim with his gun. Perhaps its not surprising knowing Stalin himself was beaten SAVAGELY by his own drunken father.

Forced deportations to Siberia, sending people to gulags where they were worked to death, collectivisation, famines, arbitrary killing of fellow Communist Party officials, purges of the military, the list goes on. His spy chief Lavrentiy Beria was arguably just as sadistic - once reported to have tortured an opponent's widow in her prison cell with a snake.
 
Some type already mentioned here. In addition to that, people who smear aid workers due to political agenda are absolute lunatics.
 
Definitely Stalin and Pol Pot in terms of the 20th century.

From more recent times I would call out Tony Blair. The very definition of a smiling assassin. Post-Chilcot and even in his relative public exile, he still genuinely seems to think that everything he did was right.

The fact that he is so intelligent, articulate, well-mannered, charismatic and magnetic (if you didn’t know who he was, and you met him, you would trust him implicitly within minutes) makes it far worse by the way.

Bad people have sometimes been partially let down by society, however evil people always know exactly what they are doing. That’s the difference.
 
Strewth....

Hitler, Stalin and Mao were the greatest monsters because they had maximum license to impose their ideas and make those ideas more important than people.

Then there are second-division monsters such Pol Pot, the Duvaliers, Amin, Milosevic who were limited only by geographical scope in imposing their ideas.

Painful even to think of such people.
 
Last edited:
Hitler.

Guy was personification of evil. Killed a lot of people and millions more died around the world due to his deeds.

Heck, IMO, he is the true reason behind birth of (modern) Israel state.
 
Ultimately if you differentiate between humans like majority of people in the world do even majority on here do you will get exploited by leaders such as Trump, Hitler, Modi etc. You can’t blame leaders like these who just manipulate and take the mindset of general people to extreme, until people start thinking of each other as same these kind of leaders will continue to emerge..

So if you guys put such leaders in this list means 90% of the world is evil including you guys.

I agree with other posters who Mentioned rapist, pedophilles, murderers, etc
 
big_gamer007 said:
Ultimately if you differentiate between humans like majority of people in the world do even majority on here do you will get exploited by leaders such as Trump, Hitler, Modi etc. You can’t blame leaders like these who just manipulate and take the mindset of general people to extreme, until people start thinking of each other as same these kind of leaders will continue to emerge..
Click to expand...

Yes, we can.

You might as well say that Wilberforce, Lincoln, Gandhi, MLK, Mandela shouldn’t get any credit because people followed them.
 
Hitman said:
Very good point.
Click to expand...

The Jewish people* Hitler & co. killed have nothing to do with modern Israeli Zionists.

You see, whilst Hitler's psychos were killing these people in Auschwitz. The Zionists were lending money to Nazis in Berlin and basically financing their war.

The ultimate insult to all those people who died in camps is to link them to state of Israel.

*They were common economic immigrants trying to earn a living in EU. Same as millions of Arabs, Chinese or Desis etc. of 2018
 
Last edited:
WhenSultansBowled said:
Hitler.

Guy was personification of evil. Killed a lot of people and millions more died around the world due to his deeds.

Heck, IMO, he is the true reason behind birth of (modern) Israel state.
Click to expand...

what about Winston Churchill who starved out 2 million people in India

is he any less terrorist than Hitler
 
for me the current living worst person for me is Henry Kissinger

he should hanging for crimes he did against humanity

btw he has got Nobel peace prize
 
Robert said:
Tell us how he did that.
Click to expand...

Sure :))
In fact British empire did no harm to India at all. They all just used to read Lord of the rings , make merry , hunt and listen to the Beatles.
Good times. Wish I could relive that era!
 
Winston Churchill was a racist , pathetic individual who considered Indians no more than small cockroaches.
Those who eulogize him are no better either.
 
Robert said:
Tell us how he did that.
Click to expand...

Churchill shame role in Bengal famine
Few statesmen of the 20th century have reputations as outsize as Winston Churchill's. And yet his assiduously self-promoted image as what the author Harold Evans called "the British Lionheart on the ramparts of civilization" rests primarily on his World War II rhetoric, rather than his actions as the head of a government that ruled the biggest empire the world has ever known. Madhusree Mukerjee's new book, Churchill's Secret War, reveals a side of Churchill largely ignored in the West and considerably tarnishes his heroic sheen.

In 1943, some 3 million brown-skinned subjects of the Raj died in the Bengal famine, one of history's worst. Mukerjee delves into official documents and oral accounts of survivors to paint a horrifying portrait of how Churchill, as part of the Western war effort, ordered the diversion of food from starving Indians to already well-supplied British soldiers and stockpiles in Britain and elsewhere in Europe, including Greece and Yugoslavia. And he did so with a churlishness that cannot be excused on grounds of policy: Churchill's only response to a telegram from the government in Delhi about people perishing in the famine was to ask why Gandhi hadn't died yet.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2031992,00.html
 
good guy said:
Churchill shame role in Bengal famine
Few statesmen of the 20th century have reputations as outsize as Winston Churchill's. And yet his assiduously self-promoted image as what the author Harold Evans called "the British Lionheart on the ramparts of civilization" rests primarily on his World War II rhetoric, rather than his actions as the head of a government that ruled the biggest empire the world has ever known. Madhusree Mukerjee's new book, Churchill's Secret War, reveals a side of Churchill largely ignored in the West and considerably tarnishes his heroic sheen.

In 1943, some 3 million brown-skinned subjects of the Raj died in the Bengal famine, one of history's worst. Mukerjee delves into official documents and oral accounts of survivors to paint a horrifying portrait of how Churchill, as part of the Western war effort, ordered the diversion of food from starving Indians to already well-supplied British soldiers and stockpiles in Britain and elsewhere in Europe, including Greece and Yugoslavia. And he did so with a churlishness that cannot be excused on grounds of policy: Churchill's only response to a telegram from the government in Delhi about people perishing in the famine was to ask why Gandhi hadn't died yet.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2031992,00.html
Click to expand...

He already knows that.

Alas, as the Spanish refrán goes: No hay peor sordo que el que no quiere oír meaning: There are none so deaf as those who don't wanna listen.
 
and also who can not forget these historical evils person on earth

Caligula


nero
 
Last edited:
good guy said:
Churchill shame role in Bengal famine
Few statesmen of the 20th century have reputations as outsize as Winston Churchill's. And yet his assiduously self-promoted image as what the author Harold Evans called "the British Lionheart on the ramparts of civilization" rests primarily on his World War II rhetoric, rather than his actions as the head of a government that ruled the biggest empire the world has ever known. Madhusree Mukerjee's new book, Churchill's Secret War, reveals a side of Churchill largely ignored in the West and considerably tarnishes his heroic sheen.

In 1943, some 3 million brown-skinned subjects of the Raj died in the Bengal famine, one of history's worst. Mukerjee delves into official documents and oral accounts of survivors to paint a horrifying portrait of how Churchill, as part of the Western war effort, ordered the diversion of food from starving Indians to already well-supplied British soldiers and stockpiles in Britain and elsewhere in Europe, including Greece and Yugoslavia. And he did so with a churlishness that cannot be excused on grounds of policy: Churchill's only response to a telegram from the government in Delhi about people perishing in the famine was to ask why Gandhi hadn't died yet.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2031992,00.html
Click to expand...

Unlikely. There was no way to get a significant relief convoy to India as the IJN had sunk 200,000 tons of merchant shipping, in addition to two battleships.

You say nothing of the Burmese refugee crisis - millions flooding into Bengal ahead of the Japanese Army. You say nothing of the typhoon and flooding that destroyed the harvest. Or of the Japanese bombing of Calcutta, degrading local communications.

Churchill was furious with the Indian independence movement at a time when Britain was in direst emergency, and there is evidence that he turned his gaze away. But there was little that could be done.

The Famine Code was never invoked by the Raj administration and the other provinces hoarded food, fearing that Bengal was about to fall to the Japanese. That was a failure.

Also the retreating British Army burned food stocks to prevent the Japanese seizing them.

So in summary, the Famine was caused by many factors.

Not until 1944, when Slim began to push the Japanese back in Rangoon, freeing troops up to manage the Famine, did it come under control.
 
Robert said:
Unlikely. There was no way to get a significant relief convoy to India as the IJN had sunk 200,000 tons of merchant shipping, in addition to two battleships.

You say nothing of the Burmese refugee crisis - millions flooding into Bengal ahead of the Japanese Army. You say nothing of the typhoon and flooding that destroyed the harvest. Or of the Japanese bombing of Calcutta, degrading local communications.

Churchill was furious with the Indian independence movement at a time when Britain was in direst emergency, and there is evidence that he turned his gaze away. But there was little that could be done.

The Famine Code was never invoked by the Raj administration and the other provinces hoarded food, fearing that Bengal was about to fall to the Japanese. That was a failure.

Also the retreating British Army burned food stocks to prevent the Japanese seizing them.

So in summary, the Famine was caused by many factors.

Not until 1944, when Slim began to push the Japanese back in Rangoon, freeing troops up to manage the Famine, did it come under control.
Click to expand...

All well and good, but it doesn't really address Churchill diverting the food from starving Bengalis to already well supplied British soldiers and Europe. Or his tetchy response on being told about the famine to ask if Gandhi had died yet.

As a fellow native Brit, I feel we don't need to make excuses for Britain's greatest ever leader, and no justification is needed to explain why ensuring the health and vigour of her Majesty's finest soldiers must always remain paramount for the nation.
 
Churchill is an interesting one - in Britain we grow up being warned against the dangers of historic cult of personality (Hitler, Stalin etc), whereas modern examples such as Kim Jong-Un are positively mocked by our media - but this mythical status is in fact exactly what we have granted to “Winnie”. His name, his image, his voice and the steamrolling exultation of his legacy are everywhere in our culture.

No doubt Churchill is one of the most influential Britons in the long history of the isles, however his narrative is protected against legitimate criticism by a well-established and viciously viral cult of personality. If you want to burrow really deeply into this, you can even roughly measure the decline of Christianity in Britain on an opposite trajectory to the increasing worship of Churchill as the new heir absolute - the saviour of humanity.

Since the mid-20th century, it seems to me that Britain has enacted Nietzschian philosophy in a very specific manner. We killed God, just like every other major country in Europe, however rather than moving forward as a truly atheistic society, we held on to our holy parents: if Queen Elizabeth II is often vaunted as the mother of the modern United Kingdom, then Churchill would undoubtedly be its father.
 
His voluminous text on history of Britain was quite an interesting read though. I can understand why the English would love him.
 
Cpt. Rishwat said:
All well and good, but it doesn't really address Churchill diverting the food from starving Bengalis to already well supplied British soldiers and Europe. Or his tetchy response on being told about the famine to ask if Gandhi had died yet.

As a fellow native Brit, I feel we don't need to make excuses for Britain's greatest ever leader, and no justification is needed to explain why ensuring the health and vigour of her Majesty's finest soldiers must always remain paramount for the nation.
Click to expand...

How could he have diverted food from Bengal to Europe? Look at the maps. The likely destination of any food supplies coming from India was Russia via Iran, which was joint-occupied by the British Empire and Soviets.

Remember also that the vast majority of the British Army in India was not British soldiers, but Indian soldiers fighting to protect India from Imperial Japan. Those two and a half million Indians needed food to fight. That alleged great racist Churchill paid tribute to their valour and sacrifice. It was the Quit India crew he didn't like.
 
Robert said:
How could he have diverted food from Bengal to Europe? Look at the maps. The likely destination of any food supplies coming from India was Russia via Iran, which was joint-occupied by the British Empire and Soviets.

Remember also that the vast majority of the British Army in India was not British soldiers, but Indian soldiers fighting to protect India from Imperial Japan. Those two and a half million Indians needed food to fight. That alleged great racist Churchill paid tribute to their valour and sacrifice. It was the Quit India crew he didn't like.
Click to expand...

I was going from the Time Magazine article linked:

In 1943, some 3 million brown-skinned subjects of the Raj died in the Bengal famine, one of history's worst. Mukerjee delves into official documents and oral accounts of survivors to paint a horrifying portrait of how Churchill, as part of the Western war effort, ordered the diversion of food from starving Indians to already well-supplied British soldiers and stockpiles in Britain and elsewhere in Europe, including Greece and Yugoslavia.

So the food diverted to the soldiers would have been those fighting for the British in India I would think, whatever their ethnic group.
 
Are we talking of individuals or groups of people? If the latter then rapists have to be the worst. They take a person's dignity and self respect away often without killing them. This is much worse then murder. Genghis Khan and Alexander the so-called great also killed and enslaved million's. I find being enslaved another very cruel thing human's have done to each other.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Asad T
LASIK eye surgery - Would you suggest it?
Replies
11
Views
339
RidiculousMan
RidiculousMan
IAJ
How India's 12 States are Fighting an Internal War
Replies
46
Views
652
IAJ
IAJ
Mamoon
What is your opinion on Savings Account (Bank interest) in light of Islam?
Replies
42
Views
896
ElRaja
ElRaja
BouncerGuy
Israel facing ‘national emergency’ as it battles worst wildfires in a decade
Replies
74
Views
2K
The Bald Eagle
The Bald Eagle
The Bald Eagle
  • Poll Poll
[PICTURE] Heel or Baby face, which role will you prefer for yourself?
Replies
12
Views
330
Bhaijaan
Bhaijaan
Back
Top