My view is that people are found two extremes when it comes to Younis.
They either overrate him or underrate him. The people who tend to overrate him have a soft corner for him because of all the personally tragedies that he has been through, and also because he never had the star power that someone of his performances deserved.
They also overrate him because the mediocrity around him post 2010 made him look better than he was, and they have seemingly forgotten that when Inzamam and Yousuf were around, he was basically third fiddle.
The people who underrate him are the ones who are too young to remember the 2000s, and they don’t remember his good performances outside Asia before 2016 and also his success in ODI cricket in the 2000s.
Younis is polarizing figure and his own personality and antics at different stages of his career have not helped matters either. He has been a controversy magnet since 2007 when he backed out of captaincy at the last minute and kickstarted a period of chaos and instability that last until Misbah’s appointment as ODI captain in May 2011.
Pretty much this. Agree/disagree with parts of the earlier one which I quoted when citing redundancy of the thread, but the margins are too narrow to knit-pick impact or lack thereof in individual innings. And frankly, too much time has elapsed with the discussion being more or less moot.
In regards to this post, I do not blame younger posters on PP for ill-informed comparisons based on just the last decade or similar for other players. It gets annoying when people thump their opinions with verve and conviction which may put the most astute observers to shame, despite their not having watched the games. Highlights only go a limited way with cricket.
Younus will remain a polarising figure due to his hasty press conferences, playing in the shadow of far more gifted albeit sometimes indifferent contemporaries in the shape of Yousuf/Inzamam, a short run and an unceremonious end to his captaincy with Oathgate, his disciplinarian and authoritarian attitude which often led to his temper getting the better of him and a deep seated cynicism for the system which he never failed to voice.
The other thing I miss about him was his being mentally present on the field. In terms of tactical changes and observations often with a short turnaround. But in most instances these are very difficult to pinpoint and isolate apart from the most obvious of cases.