What's new

ICC CT 2017 | Final : India vs Pakistan | 18th June, 2017 | The Oval | Pre-Match Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Amir and Fahim are playing for Raees and Immad(bold move), both are correct moves. If Amir is not 100% he should not play, otherwise he is no brainer.

Wicket will be belter, we need wicket taking bowlers (Amir, Junaid, Hasan, Shahab) and batting all rounder aka Fahim. Containing all rounder (Immad) will not be useful.

Is this confirm? [MENTION=5869]yasir[/MENTION] bhai
 
Pakistan's selection will cost them the cup

Pakistan can win tommorrow but I am 100% certain the selection mistakes will prevent them.

Save this prediction and serve it to me with some humble pie if I am wrong:

Mistake number 1 : Imad will start in place of Fahim. His left arm lollipops will be feasted on. You can't contain the Indians on a 300+ pitch. His batting is toothless and lacks any purpose.

Mistake number 2: Hafeez is a sure start. His bowling will be negated by the pitch. When he steps onto the crease to bat he is going to fill the Indians with confidence. Poor Haaris my sympathies are with him while he sits out and watches Hafeez getting mauled by Kumar and co. On the plus side Hafeez is building a strong case for getting dropped for good.

Mistake number 3: The batting order is poo. Our best middle order bats that can rotate the strike come in too late. Sarfaraz and Shoaib need to take some responsibility and move up the order AHEAD of Azam. This won't happen ofcourse.
 
I'm chill. Tommorrow is going go be like a movie you've seen before. I'm still going to watch it though!
 
1 Azhar
2 Fakhar
3 Malik - spin bowler
4. Babar
5. Hafeez - spin bowler
6. Sarfaraz
7. Fahim
8. Amir - if these 8 can't bat and score, no one will
9. Hassan
10. Junaid
11. Raees - 5 fast/medium fast no more than 2 spinners required

Also, don't play panic games rather play attacking game irrespective of the result
 
the four seamers should play Aamir, Junaid, Hassan, Raees and Shadab/Imad. I have an issue with Imads inclusion. He seems to have cemented his place in the team but he is a very limited bowler but seems to be a stong personality within the team and has the ear of Mickey Arthur which means he gets in the team.
 
[MENTION=141557]Chief Destroyer[/MENTION] singing after the game:


Note [MENTION=100918]Square Drive[/MENTION] [MENTION=47617]Red Devil[/MENTION]

:pakflag2
 
I'm chill. Tommorrow is going go be like a movie you've seen before. I'm still going to watch it though!

I never watch a same movie twice at least not unless decades have gone by.

So I hope the sequel is better than the prequel.
 
We should not play more than 3 specialist bowlers. Unbelievable obsession with playing 4 seamers. Fahim should be fourth seamer and he is good for that, Shadab should be the spinner.
 
Sehwag asks Shoaib Akhtar "Is Pakistan capable to chase 250-280?"

Sehwag implies that Pakistan will not be able chase 280 because they didn't chase any big scores this tournament (this is true though).

If Pakistan plays few dot balls, then it should be walk in the park to chase 280.
 
How about liquid form worries about his own team for a change.
 
Some useful stats for Oval Cricket Stadium

- About 68 matches are played on this ground, win/loss ratio as follows
- 38 matches are won by team batting second
- 28 matches are won by team batting first
- Highest score at this ground is 398 by New Zealand at 2015 WC
- Lowest score at this ground is 144 by Srilanka
- Best bowling performance is by Umer Gul when he took 6 wickets for 30+ runs
- Fast bowler got 65 % of total wickets at this stadium
- Spinners took 35 % of total wickets
- Overall stat suggest Oval support pace bowling, it has good bounce and also
supports team batting second and pitch become little easier while chasing
 
- About 68 matches are played on this ground, win/loss ratio as follows
- 38 matches are won by team batting second
- 28 matches are won by team batting first
- Highest score at this ground is 398 by New Zealand at 2015 WC
- Lowest score at this ground is 144 by Srilanka
- Best bowling performance is by Umer Gul when he took 6 wickets for 30+ runs
- Fast bowler got 65 % of total wickets at this stadium
- Spinners took 35 % of total wickets
- Overall stat suggest Oval support pace bowling, it has good bounce and also
supports team batting second and pitch become little easier while chasing

I thought 2015 WC was in NZ and AUS not in england :/
 
My confidence would take a massive hit if Rumman Raess is dropped and Pakistan dont play four pacers which includes Amir

Surely Sarfaraz and Arthur cant make such a mistake. So worried right now!
 
Sehwag implies that Pakistan will not be able chase 280 because they didn't chase any big scores this tournament (this is true though).

If Pakistan plays few dot balls, then it should be walk in the park to chase 280.

There is huge difference between 250 and 280 for Pakistan team.

250 will be easy. They chased 237 and looked well set against England to chase 250 as well. 280 and things will get tricky unless Fakhar fires again. But even then later batsman will have to score singles every over and can't afford to see some overs to settle down after fall of wicket like in previous 3 games. This mean extra pressure and we all know how our batting cope with it when asked to score quickly.
 
Malik needs to bat at 4 and Sarfraz at 5

These two can maximize the output in the middle overs when it comes to playing spin, Pandya is not much of a threat.
 
I will be upset if Pakistan loses and eventually move on from the defeat if Pakistan is competitive. I will stop watching Pakistan cricket for a while if it's a one-sided affair. I just can't take another humilation

Hoping for a Pakistan win.
 
Guys, reports are that Rumman and Imad are going to be dropped. Shadab will play, along with Fahim. Imo they needed to stick with Rumman in place of Amir, but that would've required lots of guts on part of the management. However, we still got Imad being dropped, so that's a huge plus. Seems like our 'thick' tank is actually thinking for once.
 
Well, cricket isn't the only thing India would be hammering Pak in tomorrow. There is also a hockey game.

And then our boy Sri Kidambi is gonna win the Indonesian Open World Superseries Badminton singles final.

It's gonna be a good day for Indian sport!
 
Don't let India chase. They have lost last 4 games defending 300+ for a reason. Pakistan can likely chase 280 but can't defend it.
 
Pakistan will make a huge blunder if they insist on playing Hafeez at 4. Sarfraz needs to be bold and realize it's in the best interests of the team for him to bat at 4. Our chances of victory will depend on such tactical nous.
 
Too excite can't sleep :akhtar
Just hope the boys will keep the same attitude .
 
Well, cricket isn't the only thing India would be hammering Pak in tomorrow. There is also a hockey game.

And then our boy Sri Kidambi is gonna win the Indonesian Open World Superseries Badminton singles final.

It's gonna be a good day for Indian sport!

Uhhh I'm telling you this right now that no one outside of India cares about badminton lmao. That's a recreation sport like bowling. Lol badminton gimme a break.

Any who, I'm hoping Fahim plays ideally for Shadab. It's a waste playing a spinner against India.

1. Azhar Ali
2. Fakhar Zaman
3. Babar Azam
4. Mohammad Hafeez
5. Shoaib Malik
6. Sarfraz Ahmed
7. Imad Wasim
8. Fahim Ashraf
9. Mohammad Amir
10. Hasan Ali
11. Junaid Khan
 
Uhhh I'm telling you this right now that no one outside of India cares about badminton lmao. That's a recreation sport like bowling. Lol badminton gimme a break.

Any who, I'm hoping Fahim plays ideally for Shadab. It's a waste playing a spinner against India.

1. Azhar Ali
2. Fakhar Zaman
3. Babar Azam
4. Mohammad Hafeez
5. Shoaib Malik
6. Sarfraz Ahmed
7. Imad Wasim
8. Fahim Ashraf
9. Mohammad Amir
10. Hasan Ali
11. Junaid Khan

what nobody care about badminton outside india? another funny post by a pakistani poster. Just because there is no pakistani player who plays badminton does not mean that nobody cares about it. For your info, badminton is an international sport and people in general know more about badminton as a sport than cricket and also he is playing against a non-indian. You need to increase your general knowledge.
 
what nobody care about badminton outside india? another funny post by a pakistani poster. Just because there is no pakistani player who plays badminton does not mean that nobody cares about it. For your info, badminton is an international sport and people in general know more about badminton as a sport than cricket and also he is playing against a non-indian. You need to increase your general knowledge.

This is NOT a badminton forum, if you are ur fellow countrymen wants to discuss that then get out of here!
 
no one is discussing badminton here. I just corrected your poster.

Some were, instead of talking about general knowledge, there should be a certain awareness, noone cares here how a team is doing in other sports.
 
Amir and Fahim are playing for Raees and Immad(bold move), both are correct moves. If Amir is not 100% he should not play, otherwise he is no brainer.

Wicket will be belter, we need wicket taking bowlers (Amir, Junaid, Hasan, Shahab) and batting all rounder aka Fahim. Containing all rounder (Immad) will not be useful.

Where are you getting this from?

And I agree, we need four strike bowlers. Shadab has to play, an attacking leggie could very well be the difference. His batting is pretty decent as well (as good as Immad with far better hitting capabilities) and not to mention he is an excellent fielder. Meanwhile Immad will try his best to dive over the ball and gift a couple where there is a single run.
 
Last edited:
I'm chill. Tommorrow is going go be like a movie you've seen before. I'm still going to watch it though!

Except this time, there is a twist in the end. Ooops sorry, I didnt intend to put that spoiler. Can PP admins add spoiler alert before my post? :afridi
 
Imad bowled 5 overs for 16 runs @3.20 per over. This will apply pressure and strangle the Indian batsmen, forcing them to play shots, which will increase the chances of taking wickets.
Imad is best suited to batting at the death, so if our other batsmen play their role, Imad will be invaluable.
I honestly don't see how Shadab remains in the team ahead of Imad. I like Shadab, but at the moment he isn't consistent enough. He bowls too many loose deliveries. His batting also doesn't compare to Imad's in my opinion. Yes, Shadab took one wicket while Imad didn't get any in the last game, but that's only going by one game - Imad is usually more successful.
I really hope that Imad is retained if only one of the two are selected.

In any case, go Pakistan! Inshallah we bring it home!
 
Choosing Imad is foolishness,we all know he can't bat,we need Shadab khan,he is a decent batsman and a attacking leggy
 
[MENTION=141557]Chief Destroyer[/MENTION] singing after the game:


Note [MENTION=100918]Square Drive[/MENTION] [MENTION=47617]Red Devil[/MENTION]

:pakflag2

I'll be sure to catch [MENTION=141557]Chief Destroyer[/MENTION]'s performance! :akhtar
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top