Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Crowd will come in towards later part of the day. I was in Ahmedabad few days back and it's really hot and humid city.Where are the crowd?
Ahmedabad is a working city. Nobody is going to take off and come and watch ENG v NZ on a hot afternoon like this.Only a few thousand in the stadium for the start of a world cup. Serves the BCCI right for their incompetence in organising this tournament but what an embarrassment.
Pretty sad to see tbh..First match. Empty stadium.
Pretty sad to see tbh..
Wanted a grand opening ceremony and a packed match to kick things off.
I think it'll light up in the evening.First match. Empty stadium.
Exactly the problem with ODI cricketI think it'll light up in the evening.
Woww. Take the GDP per capita of football audience and the GDP per capita of cricket audience and you would find football is atleast 10 times ahead.Ahmedabad is a working city. Nobody is going to take off and come and watch ENG v NZ on a hot afternoon like this.
Ahmedabad is a working city. Nobody is going to take off and come and watch ENG v NZ on a hot afternoon like this.
You mean football fans watch a 7 hour sport where they'll come and support neutral teams, taking off and braving heat?Woww. Take the GDP per capita of football audience and the GDP per capita of cricket audience and you would find football is atleast 10 times ahead.
Do football fans not work? How do they still end up earning so much more?
Precisely the problem with ODI Cricket where people start watching after 60% of the match is completed.
How many neutral fans watched NZ vs SA when the World Cup was held in England? This si the equivalent of that. Around 4 million are already watching on Hotstar in India - a paid subscription.Then the game shouldn't be hosted there.
India should have played the first game.You mean football fans watch a 7 hour sport where they'll come and support neutral teams, taking off and braving heat?
Buddy, only 12000 or so were even present to watch Australia take on Afghanistan in the World T20 at Adelaide last year and it was a home game and it was essentially a knockout for Australia. Does that mean T20 is dead in Australia?
How many neutral fans watched NZ vs SA when the World Cup was held in England? This si the equivalent of that. Around 4 million are already watching on Hotstar in India - a paid subscription.
How many neutral fans watched NZ vs SA when the World Cup was held in England? This si the equivalent of that.
Let's not go there. Plenty of jobless people in Karachi and Karachi attendances are poor even for PSL.India should have played the first game.
but there are so many jobless people in India. The YouTube comments of Pakistani "sports journalists " are filled with Indians. These "sports journalists " are people who their own families wouldn't watch
Where are these people when you need them the most?
And this will have people poring in for the 2nd half. Nobody cares enough about these two teams to come here in the afternoon sun.NZ v SA in 2019 was a sell out with a packed out stadium (so at least 3x as many people as are currently in the stadium for this game) despite also being a rain affected game. It also wasn't the opening game of the world cup and didn't feature the world champions.
Yes in rural areas most of people's are watching on TV but these days Hotstar is most suitable option as Internet Speed is good all over India .btw 5G internet is free so People's watching more on Mobile .Don’t people in India just have cable?
I can get ICC events + EPL + many cricket series + entire Disney/Marvel content for 400 rupees a year on my cellphone. It works out cheaper than cable for me.Don’t people in India just have cable?
I can get ICC events + EPL + many cricket series + entire Disney/Marvel content for 400 rupees a year on my cellphone. It works out cheaper than cable for me.
And this will have people poring in for the 2nd half. Nobody cares enough about these two teams to come here in the afternoon sun.
This is insane. There has to be a catch to it. It's too good to be trueI can get ICC events + EPL + many cricket series + entire Disney/Marvel content for 400 rupees a year on my cellphone. It works out cheaper than cable for me.
I think it'll light up in the evening.
If it was hosted in Pakistan it would have a crowd because since the 2009 ban, we still don't play as much at home as international sides. It has increased at home but not to the level of other sides so it's a treat to watch.True but still this is so poor. I doubt it would be this empty if it was hosted in Pakistan.
The WC without a crowd just feel soulless.
And if you are going to open with non host teams, then atleast choose a smaller stadium, so it looks fuller! But then BCCI and logic rately go hand in handOpening match should have featured India (home team)
Poor scheduling
On what basis are you saying this? Yeah it's been poorly organised no doubt and you'll probably get better crowds at a couple of other venues but even back in 2011 neutral games didn't always have massive crowds.If the stadiums going to be empty for the first half then the opening game of the world cup shouldn't have been played on this day/at this time/at this venue (pick whichever you want).
On what basis are you saying this? Yeah it's been poorly organised no doubt and you'll probably get better crowds at a couple of other venues but even back in 2011 neutral games didn't always have massive crowds.
People will still tune in to watch though.
Even this was perfectly organised, you won't get full houses to watch these teams play in the first half.Because having a mostly empty stadium for the opening game of the tournament is an embarrassment and just one among a long list of pieces of incompetent management there's been around this tournament. Heck, the fixtures weren't even finalised until 3 weeks ago! The fixtures should've been determined a year ago with the tickets on sale shortly after.
Even this was perfectly organised, you won't get full houses to watch these teams play in the first half.
This venue is chosen to gain political mileage, it's named after the Current PM in his home state . Out of nowhere this venue gets all the important matches, such as opening, finals, India Pakistan and a few others. This WC is all about Modi this Modi that..So once again, questions should be asked over why this venue and/or these teams were selected. A 95% empty stadium for the opening ball of the world cup is an embarrassment.
So once again, questions should be asked over why this venue and/or these teams were selected. A 95% empty stadium for the opening ball of the world cup is an embarrassment.
Only you seem embarrassed by it. This is gonna be a much better World Cup than England can ever hope to have. And that's despite the pathetic organising .So once again, questions should be asked over why this venue and/or these teams were selected. A 95% empty stadium for the opening ball of the world cup is an embarrassment.
Only you seem embarrassed by it. This is gonna be a much better World Cup than England can ever hope to have. And that's despite the pathetic organising .
You can take any venue in India and it won't have much of a crowd on a hot afternoon on a weekday.
Neither England nor NZ are enough of a draw to get that.
i remember the 1996 world cup opener which was played between England and NZ as well in India and it was a full stadium.Indian public just wants to see their team play
Why would they take a day off during the working week and come and watch these teams?
Even if you accept the fact that it is terribly organised and I accept that it is one, you are making it out like it's an embarrassing state of affairs that there's no full house for this game in the very first half.You seem to have taken this as some sort of insult to your nationalist pride rather than looking objectively at the awful organisation of this world cup and what I'm saying, at which point it's not really worth discussing any more.
1996 is pretty much ancient history. Random tri series crowds had huge crowds . Now even India matches are not packed during the day.i remember the 1996 world cup opener which was played between England and NZ as well in India and it was a full stadium.
Even if you accept the fact that it is terribly organised and I accept that it is one, you are making it out like it's an embarrassing state of affairs that there's no full house for this game in the very first half.
How many opening matches of World Cup matches do you even remember? Certainly not the farce that was 99 ? Or 07 or 2015?
It's horribly organised and I squarely blame BCCI /Jay Shah/current ruling dispensation for this .
But even then, you're simply not gonna find packed houses for random games on a weekday. 2nd half will be much better especially in other venues.
Nothing . Point was nobody remembers those matches and as long as we get crowds for the bigger matches , the lack of crowds alone is not enough to be embarrassed about .There's clearly something on the scale between a full house and only having a few thousand people in to watch the opening ball of the world cup.
What did you think was farcical about the organisation/crowds at the 1999/2007/2015 world cups?
What an embarrassment.
Would have gotten more people to turn up for Bangladesh vs Nepal in Napier.
With your postage stamp sized stadias even a church boot sale would fill up the stadium.What an embarrassment.
Would have gotten more people to turn up for Bangladesh vs Nepal in Napier.
Because in 1996 Indians only followed cricket. People had no interst in following Athletics, Squash etc, Since thsi morning India has won many medals inc,luding Gold, Silver and Bronze at the Asian Games. So obviously people will give that more preference than a match where India isn;t featuring. Today Neeraj Chopra ia also a huge star in India like any other cricketer. India has taken rapid strides in the field of sports since 1996. Once the Asian games are over you will see better crowds if not full stadiums for non-india matches.i remember the 1996 world cup opener which was played between England and NZ as well in India and it was a full stadium.
Thats because Bangladeshi and Nepali fans would throng the stadium who will cheer their team. Matches featuring Asian teams usually dont have any trouble in filling stadiums. But will a west indies vs south africa match attract the same crowd in Napier?What an embarrassment.
Would have gotten more people to turn up for Bangladesh vs Nepal in Napier.
Pitches between India and Pakistan are two very different things.Flat roads of Indian pitches could also make it a boring world cup. Sub continent shouldn't hold any major tournaments as pitches are mostly hurrendous, just batting friendly paradise without much for the bowler.
No catch. It allows one device at a time. Pay few more rupees and get 2-4 device streaming at a time. Even the top subscription (premium) costs some INR 1400/year with 4k and Dolby Atmos.This is insane. There has to be a catch to it. It's too good to be true
Yes Pakistan has only flat roads, and India has flat roads and dust bowls so equally horrendous pitchesPitches between India and Pakistan are two very different things.
And no, Ramiz Raja has no right to speak on pitches.
You know, my guy.Yes Pakistan has only flat roads, and India has flat roads and dust bowls so equally horrendous pitches
Lol, it is not 250,000I think it is a good crowd. The stadium capacity is 250,000 or something so even a crowd of 50k will look small.
Think India as host should have been playing the opening game of the tournament, probably against England as the holder. If not they should have held the match somewhere like Delhi where a 50k crowd would have looked big.