What's new

ICC World Cup 2023: India (201/4) comfortably defeat Australia (199) by 6 wickets

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,142
200 is the target.

Simple or will it be one of those tricky ones?

India with a great chance to kick-off their World Cup campaign with a huge statement.


1696769726325.png

==

All posters please take note of the following guidelines for match threads on PakPassion:

1. No personal insults at other posters, players, officials, coaching staffs etc.

2. No making fun of player's, official's, coaching staff's names.

3. Do not add any references to media, their social media or post any pictures or screenshots from other sports websites.

4. Stick to commenting on this match. There is no need to bring other countries into the match discussion as there are plenty of other threads where those discussions can be added.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Starc, Josh, Cummins will be tough upfront. NO two ways about that. In the recent tour he swung it well.
 
It will be tricky. But think India should win this unless they play below their standards.
 
So during the world cup India will be getting helpful wickets and all others teams will be getting roads and highways
 
India 70-30 favorites I think. Can afford to do all the tuk tuk they want today.
 
@MMHS
Product of their time really. Hard to truly make a comparison. We can both filter stats and manipulate data to prove that a specific era was or is superior. I blame ipl and t20 for the poor technique on display vs spin.
However power hitting and ability vs pace has vastly improved in recent times.

More bowling attacks with an all round potent bowling attack. Like even the third and sometimes 4th options in a starting 11 are very good bowlers.

I do agree spin was superior back in the days but it's hard to judge due to lack of drs. It obviously works both ways but 90s era being rigged by fixing etc, I find it hard to label that era of bowlers as superior in terms of pace bowling or bowling in general.
 
India is an average chaser nowadays, with virtually tail end beginning from the 6th wicket. If the ball spins, our batters would dance, if swings, we are done for!
 
Zampa is the deciding factor. India has a long tail. So Australia doesn't have to worry about taking all the wickets.
 
Absolutely unfathomable how Khwaja Usman isn't a part of the side when the WC is in such spinning conditions. He would improve this brittle Aussie batting significantly.
 
…. Just to carry on the discussion- I watched almost entire Aussie innings.

Honestly, I haven’t seen a single shot, even defensive shot … where batsmen used any sort of foot work - never seen them tying to “lunge forward” and meet the turning ball on pitching - all I saw is sweep & going back to good length balls to be cramped. And, absolutely no use of wrist ….

Is this batting technique?
 
Zampa, Sodhi, Santner, Moeen and Adil Rashid always have been problematic for the Indians.
 
Absolutely unfathomable how Khwaja Usman isn't a part of the side when the WC is in such spinning conditions. He would improve this brittle Aussie batting significantly.

At Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Wankhede you don't need him. You just need big hitters.
 
Absolutely unfathomable how Khwaja Usman isn't a part of the side when the WC is in such spinning conditions. He would improve this brittle Aussie batting significantly.
They are definitely not going to miss his snail paced LOI batting.
 
@MMHS
Product of their time really. Hard to truly make a comparison. We can both filter stats and manipulate data to prove that a specific era was or is superior. I blame ipl and t20 for the poor technique on display vs spin.
However power hitting and ability vs pace has vastly improved in recent times.

More bowling attacks with an all round potent bowling attack. Like even the third and sometimes 4th options in a starting 11 are very good bowlers.

I do agree spin was superior back in the days but it's hard to judge due to lack of drs. It obviously works both ways but 90s era being rigged by fixing etc, I find it hard to label that era of bowlers as superior in terms of pace bowling or bowling in general.
The best example I give to sum up “modern” batting is Indian batting against spinners ….. and I am telling this after watching almost every ball of Mongia’s 150+ against Australia, batting in second innings against Warne … on a rank turner of even old FSK (Delhi) standard.
 
The best example I give to sum up “modern” batting is Indian batting against spinners ….. and I am telling this after watching almost every ball of Mongia’s 150+ against Australia, batting in second innings against Warne … on a rank turner of even old FSK (Delhi) standard.
Good point. Warne Murali would have wreaked havoc right now. But it has to be on a specific turning type pitch. On a patta with current rules etc might be a different story.
 
The best example I give to sum up “modern” batting is Indian batting against spinners ….. and I am telling this after watching almost every ball of Mongia’s 150+ against Australia, batting in second innings against Warne … on a rank turner of even old FSK (Delhi) standard.
I agree with you completely but was there Warne in that test match? There was Hogg IIRC. I could be wrong though
 
He is good at strike rotation btw
He batted like a snail the last time he even scored a 50. Against NZ in the last World Cup and nearly cost them the match of it wasn't for Carey and Starc having a great match.

He wont make it as a top order batter into this side ahead of Marsh/Smith/Head/Warner.

They all have much more upside on flat itches.

Also he last played 4 years ago.
 
Guys

Please stay on topic

This is an India v Australia World Cup game thread
 
Tactics today - I don’t think Aussies are going to defend it over 50 overs - they have to bowl India out.

Take out 5th bowler - 4 specialist bowlers bowling 4 overs with Test match fielding. Don’t think Aussies need to bother much for NRR to make the first cut.
 
Absolutely unfathomable how Khwaja Usman isn't a part of the side when the WC is in such spinning conditions. He would improve this brittle Aussie batting significantly.
Last time I recall, khawaja helped Aussies win an odi series in India.

They did win again not too long ago. 2-1 before losing the latest series.
 
…. Just to carry on the discussion- I watched almost entire Aussie innings.

Honestly, I haven’t seen a single shot, even defensive shot … where batsmen used any sort of foot work - never seen them tying to “lunge forward” and meet the turning ball on pitching - all I saw is sweep & going back to good length balls to be cramped. And, absolutely no use of wrist ….

Is this batting technique?
I thought Smith and Warner used footwork against the spinners, especially Smith who also used his wrists to good effect.
 
He batted like a snail the last time he even scored a 50. Against NZ in the last World Cup and nearly cost them the match of it wasn't for Carey and Starc having a great match.

He wont make it as a top order batter into this side ahead of Marsh/Smith/Head/Warner.

They all have much more upside on flat itches.

Also he last played 4 years ago.
He is a much better player now compared to 19.
 
Been a very interesting game tbh. 250 to 270 pitches are so much more entertaining.
 
Ishan kishan was never going to do anything against likes of starc Cummins Hazlewood
 
Ishan kishan was never going to do anything against likes of starc Cummins Hazlewood
Yeah, people were unnecessarily hyping him to bash spinners when it was clear that he won't survive Aussie pace battery
 
New ball swings under lights in Chennai, what was Kishan thinking?
 
With Kishan gone, advantage Zampa. All batsmen are right handers till Pandya. Jadeja might be required to pinch hit at some point today.
 
Yeah, people were unnecessarily hoping him to bash spinners when it was clear that he won't survive Aussie pace battery
I actually think middle order role really suited his game more. Gill got sick so he had to open
 
Junaid & Amir...


Two LFM and Indians would crumble

Hit that fourth stump and india will be looking for carp!!


MAUKAAAA
 
Kishan gone. Oh no. We don't have enough batsmen now. Because we played 6 bowlers and still let them get to 200 from 140/7.
 
True - that’s the modern standard of footwork & wrist play. Unfortunately I grew up watching some Azharuddin …
We always romanticize the past. In games like chess it is very easy to break myths because of engine evaluations, like how Magnus Carlsen is doing right now. In cricket, opinions and arguments are more qualitative than quantitative, but in my opinion Smith is as good a batsman against spin as any of the 80s or 90s titans. He has his weird funky methods but what he did in the 2017 tour to India should rank as one of the greatest batting performances against spin on challenging surfaces.
 
Thought of it being another one sided game but aussies hitting back with the ball! Game on hai..
 
That's why I was so fearful of our batting. It's simply pathetic
 
Back
Top