- Joined
- Sep 11, 2023
- Runs
- 28,038
Representing Pakistan, we have Noman Ali, and for India, the ever-reliable Ravindra Jadeja. One is just starting to make his mark, and the other is a seasoned campaigner. But the real question is: If Noman Ali had a Test career as long as Ravindra Jadeja's, would his stats surpass Jadeja’s?
Let’s compare their stats so far:
Noman Ali has played 18 matches, claiming 73 wickets with a best of 8/46. His bowling average stands at 26.49, and he has taken 7 five-wicket hauls. He’s also contributed 97 runs with a batting average of 18.10.
Ravindra Jadeja, on the other hand, has played 80 matches, picking up 323 wickets, with a best of 7/42. His bowling average is slightly better at 24.14, and he has 15 five-wicket hauls. With the bat, Jadeja has scored 2,679 runs with a batting average of 34.74.
Noman’s impact in his short career is impressive—he has a fantastic average and already has 7 five-wicket hauls, which shows his ability to perform at the highest level. Jadeja has been a consistent performer over time, but Noman's standout performance against England with 8/46 shows his potential against top teams.
While Jadeja’s longevity gives him more wickets, Noman has already proven himself against teams like Australia and England in just 18 games. So, if Noman had a career as long as Jadeja's, could his stats surpass Jadeja's?
Will Noman Ali's quality over quantity take him to the top? Or does Jadeja’s all-round consistency make him the better player in the long run?
I’m curious to hear your thoughts—If Noman Ali had a Test career as long as Ravindra Jadeja's, would his stats sur
pass Jadeja’s?
Let’s compare their stats so far:
Noman Ali has played 18 matches, claiming 73 wickets with a best of 8/46. His bowling average stands at 26.49, and he has taken 7 five-wicket hauls. He’s also contributed 97 runs with a batting average of 18.10.
Ravindra Jadeja, on the other hand, has played 80 matches, picking up 323 wickets, with a best of 7/42. His bowling average is slightly better at 24.14, and he has 15 five-wicket hauls. With the bat, Jadeja has scored 2,679 runs with a batting average of 34.74.
Noman’s impact in his short career is impressive—he has a fantastic average and already has 7 five-wicket hauls, which shows his ability to perform at the highest level. Jadeja has been a consistent performer over time, but Noman's standout performance against England with 8/46 shows his potential against top teams.
While Jadeja’s longevity gives him more wickets, Noman has already proven himself against teams like Australia and England in just 18 games. So, if Noman had a career as long as Jadeja's, could his stats surpass Jadeja's?
Will Noman Ali's quality over quantity take him to the top? Or does Jadeja’s all-round consistency make him the better player in the long run?
I’m curious to hear your thoughts—If Noman Ali had a Test career as long as Ravindra Jadeja's, would his stats sur
pass Jadeja’s?
Last edited: