Bhaijaan
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Runs
- 69,932
- Post of the Week
- 1
It’s about time we secure our borders and deport all the illegals out of our country like Unc Trump is doing in US and making America great again m
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I see no authenticity in it as there are no reports or articles.



Who is responsible for securing Indian borders?It’s about time we secure our borders and deport all the illegals out of our country like Unc Trump is doing in US and making America great again m

assam will be the next muslim majority state of india, im guessing it'll take another 15 years or so, but a combination of reproductive trends and immigration will see to it. Once the latest census figures drop people will have a better idea.

Congrats to our Bangladeshi brothers. Overwhelm these Indians and kick them into the sea (metaphorically). Send wave after wave.
Hope not...the mere thought of it sound scary. As the history shows, where ever the Muslim's are in majority, they tend to become trouble makers. The state of Assam is brilliant as it is with lovely tea gardens and picturesque landscapes. Lets hope it doesn't get polluted with that thing.assam will be the next muslim majority state of india, im guessing it'll take another 15 years or so, but a combination of reproductive trends and immigration will see to it. Once the latest census figures drop people will have a better idea.
In that case ummah starts .so better to throw all the illegal immigrantsBro, don't encourage this, you know once the Bangladeshi illegal migrants start causing major trouble in Bharat they will get slaughtered left right and centre, Mamata Ammayi is not going to be around for much longer..
sounds like sylhet, my sylhetti friend says the hill regions have more in common with assam than with the delta regions of central Bangladesh. its not a matter of hope, the demographic trends will be confirmed once census data is revealed but in the last 15 years Muslim proportion has pbly gone from 35% to 42, or 43%, which means another 15 years will be the tipping point. also once regions start become Muslim majority hindus will pbly start leaving for other places, exacerbating the trend.Hope not...the mere thought of it sound scary. As the history shows, where ever the Muslim's are in majority, they tend to become trouble makers. The state of Assam is brilliant as it is with lovely tea gardens and picturesque landscapes. Lets hope it doesn't get polluted with that thing.
once regions start become Muslim majority hindus will pbly start leaving for other places, exacerbating the trend.
its a demographic trend you cannot fight, the family structure in Islam promotes having babies, even educated working Muslim women in the west aspire to having babies and families, i know Muslim working women who have good jobs and money yet still have 3 or 4 kids, this is virtually unheard of in non-muslim circles in the west now.This I agree with, once the converts are in the majority in the subcontinent it's game over for people of other religious beliefs..
Also the converts will see to it that the land they are occupying goes right down the gutter another specialty of theirs, quite a skill...
sounds like sylhet, my sylhetti friend says the hill regions have more in common with assam than with the delta regions of central Bangladesh. its not a matter of hope, the demographic trends will be confirmed once census data is revealed but in the last 15 years Muslim proportion has pbly gone from 35% to 42, or 43%, which means another 15 years will be the tipping point. also once regions start become Muslim majority hindus will pbly start leaving for other places, exacerbating the trend.
the non Muslim social structure in india will fall apart once enough women are educated, the non Muslim birth rate will plummet like the rest of the world, significant parts of india will be Muslim majority by the turn of the next century. and once they hit a critical mass where they realise they can exert political influence, especially funded and encouraged by various external Muslim influences, Iran, saudi, etc, india will get blindsided by rapid islamification of the political landscape.
Illegal immigrationassam will be the next muslim majority state of india, im guessing it'll take another 15 years or so, but a combination of reproductive trends and immigration will see to it. Once the latest census figures drop people will have a better idea.
Easy solution. stop giving handouts.its a demographic trend you cannot fight, the family structure in Islam promotes having babies, even educated working Muslim women in the west aspire to having babies and families, i know Muslim working women who have good jobs and money yet still have 3 or 4 kids, this is virtually unheard of in non-muslim circles in the west now.
the non Muslim social structure in india will fall apart once enough women are educated, the non Muslim birth rate will plummet like the rest of the world, significant parts of india will be Muslim majority by the turn of the next century. and once they hit a critical mass where they realise they can exert political influence, especially funded and encouraged by various external Muslim influences, Iran, saudi, etc, india will get blindsided by rapid islamification of the political landscape.
the idea of secessionist movements will go out the window when Muslims realise they will have democratic influence over the whole of india, much like the religious parties of india abhored jinnah for splitting an india they believed they had divine mandate to rule over.
i like the variance in replies from the indian posters, first time ive seen that in a long time, from no its not happening, to its happening because of illegal immigration, to hand outs, to talks of genocide. its speculative so theres no point in arguing details, but assam will be a majority Muslim state by 2060 at the latest, and west bengal by 2080 to 2090. we pbly not gonna be alive to see the latter happen, but it definitely will.
once we have the census data for 2024 it will be a lot more accurate to see how this trend will play out. and we will have a better idea of when these things will happen.
The extrapolation of the increase in muslim population across the country would take Muslim population percentage to close to 45% in west bengal in 60 to 70 years, then immigration from Bangladesh, plus hindu flight could realistically see a Muslim majority. again if the latest census data shows that this growth is much lower or higher then it will happen much later or sooner, respectively.Speculation based on what data though? Immigration from Bangladesh has certainly skewed the numbers in Assam but where is the data to show that West Bengal will be Muslim majority any time in this century if at all?
The extrapolation of the increase in muslim population across the country would take Muslim population percentage to close to 45% in west bengal in 60 to 70 years, then immigration from Bangladesh, plus hindu flight could realistically see a Muslim majority. again if the latest census data shows that this growth is much lower or higher then it will happen much later or sooner, respectively.


This is exactly the reason why Bangladeshi must he thrown out. No country wants immigrants behaving like this but people with this type of terrorist mentality bring harm to the host country by behaving like pests in a healthy crop. They neither have integrity nor loyalty. Such a menace.I am normally against illegals. I want all illegal Indians out of North America, for example. Indians are the third largest group of illegals in USA.
Having said that, illegal Bangladeshis in India may have a crucial job to do. They can contribute to the eventual balkanization of India.
I have always maintained the smaller India become, the more peaceful subcontinent can become.![]()





I am normally against illegals. I want all illegal Indians out of North America, for example. Indians are the third largest group of illegals in USA.
Having said that, illegal Bangladeshis in India may have a crucial job to do. They can contribute to the eventual balkanization of India.
I have always maintained a balkanized and smaller India is good for subcontinent.


Thanks for saying the eventual dastardly plans of these illegal Bangladeshis in India.I am normally against illegals. I want all illegal Indians out of North America, for example. Indians are the third largest group of illegals in USA.
Having said that, illegal Bangladeshis in India may have a crucial job to do. They can contribute to the eventual balkanization of India.
I have always maintained a balkanized and smaller India is good for subcontinent.![]()

Small percentage? There are an estimated 2 crore Bangladeshis in India. That is like 12-13% of your entire BD population. This number was from 2016. I am sure that number has doubled since then.Having said that, I don't know why a small percentage of Bangladeshis illegally migrate to India.
I mean India is a dirty smelly unappealing 3rd world country. Why go there? Why not go to other countries like other Bangladeshis?
Anyway, they may eventually contribute to India's balkanization. That can be seen as a positive.
From military point of view, they are long-term assets/benevolent trojan horses.![]()

While I feel bad for these illegals and their plight, it shows how poor BD is.![]()

I’m concerned about the involvement in terror related activities, otherwise I feel that we must as a nation rethink our stand on this issue.
Cheap labour is a boon for any developing industrialised nation and through our own massive population and a low income Bangladesh next door, India has access to the biggest cheap labour pool in the world right now. Onus is on us actually to utilise this to our benefit. If we are able to do that it will take our economy right to the top very quicker than we thought was possible.
They will be dealt on the streets if they try anything thats against indian interestsHaving said that, I don't know why a small percentage of Bangladeshis illegally migrate to India.
I mean India is a dirty smelly unappealing 3rd world country. Why go there? Why not go to other countries like other Bangladeshis?
Anyway, they may eventually contribute to India's balkanization. That can be seen as a positive.
From military point of view, they are long-term assets/benevolent trojan horses.![]()
The PM, Amit Shah and rest of the BJP is all talk. They have done a sweet jack all regarding the roach infestation that is coming from that gutter called Bangladesh....
Call a spade a spade, I have more confidence in my Ammayi Sonya's son than the BJP government to tackle the roach infestation....
I’m concerned about the involvement in terror related activities, otherwise I feel that we must as a nation rethink our stand on this issue.
Cheap labour is a boon for any developing industrialised nation and through our own massive population and a low income Bangladesh next door, India has access to the biggest cheap labour pool in the world right now. Onus is on us actually to utilise this to our benefit. If we are able to do that it will take our economy right to the top very quicker than we thought was possible.

Agreed. But Bangladeshis should never be given citizenship etc. here.What we need is a NRC implemented and all the Bangladeshi, Rohingya immigrants identified and timely monitored. Let them join the workforce however. It’s a boost to our industry. Truth is many local Indians don’t wanna work for low wage. Look at Punjab where all these jatts do nothing but won’t ever go to factory to labour. Look at our metro cities, mostly working couples now in every household, they can’t function without multiple domestic helps.
The present SIR is a backdoor nrcWhat we need is a NRC implemented and all the Bangladeshi, Rohingya immigrants identified and timely monitored. Let them join the workforce however. It’s a boost to our industry. Truth is many local Indians don’t wanna work for low wage. Look at Punjab where all these jatts do nothing but won’t ever go to factory to labour. Look at our metro cities, mostly working couples now in every household, they can’t function without multiple domestic helps.
agreedAgreed. But Bangladeshis should never be given citizenship etc. here.
The present SIR is a backdoor nrc
No voting rights means no political support
Because they have no right to be in India.this is only the start, illegal immigrants will be dealt this way only'India put us on the boat like captives - then threw us in the sea
disgusting by the indians - how can you forceully push them out
Excellent work by India.'India put us on the boat like captives - then threw us in the sea
disgusting by the indians - how can you forceully push them out
they have a right to safe passage to the nearest safe country = UN lawsBecause they have no right to be in India.this is only the start, illegal immigrants will be dealt this way only
Read my post above this,Excellent work by India.
I also said the same when USA packed illegal Indians on a plane and send them back to India.
No law is broken. Illegal immigrants are not allowed in any country.Read my post above this,
the indians your refrerring to, broke the law, these refugees havent
they are, if thr seeking refuge from civil war, which burma is inNo law is broken. Illegal immigrants are not allowed in any country.
Why dont they take refuge in Bangladesh? That is nearer from Myanmar than India right?
You guys make me laugh. Rohingya is another example where Muslim's are not able to live peacefully with another community. In this case it is with Buddhists in Myanmar. India has all the right to protect its country to stop itself from becoming another Burma.they are, if thr seeking refuge from civil war, which burma is in

you didnt answer my question or even yours, you stated thr illegal, ive told you thr not illegal due to UN laws over civil war countries - refugees are allowed status.....You guys make me laugh. Rohingya is another example where Muslim's are not able to live peacefully with another community. In this case it is with Buddhists in Myanmar. India has all the right to protect its country to stop itself from becoming another Burma.
I ask the question again - Bangladesh is closer from Myanmar than India. Why these guys taking refuge in Delhi, in the land of Kaffirs? They can take refuge in Yunus's Bangladesh na? It will be full Bhai chaara.
India has lots of internal issues. Illegal Bangladeshis will land in sea, give or take. You are free to complain in UN though.
![]()
The law according to you - right to safe passage to the nearest safe countryyou didnt answer my question or even yours, you stated thr illegal, ive told you thr not illegal due to UN laws over civil war countries - refugees are allowed status.....
Please repsond to the question i posted and what you stated earlier on, stop changing topics, stay on track
India isn’t a signatory to un convention on refugees so Unless un is arranging logistics to get these people out, India will have to take steps to get them out of India by any which way possible,they have a right to safe passage to the nearest safe country = UN laws
Ngo judges now trying to put pressure on Cji'Dangerous Precedent': Former Judges, Senior Lawyers Write to CJI Over His Remarks on Rohingyas
The signatories argued that invoking domestic poverty to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent” and reasserted that the Rohingyas, like any person in India, are protected under Article 21.
New Delhi: A group of former judges, senior advocates and members of the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) on Friday (December 5) has written an open letter to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant expressing “deep concern” over remarks made by a Supreme Court bench which was headed by the CJI himself on December 2 while hearing a plea on the alleged custodial disappearance of Rohingya refugees. The signatories underlined that the CJI’s words “carry weight not simply in the courtroom but in the conscience of the nation” and the move to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent”.
The letter states that the comments made during the hearing particularly those “questioning the legal status of the Rohingya as refugees,” equating them with “intruders illegally entering India,” likening them to people “who dig tunnels,” and asking “whether such entrants are entitled to food, shelter and education” are “contrary to core constitutional values.” Further, the signatories mentioned that the remarks have “had the effect of dehumanising Rohingya refugees whose equal humanity and equal human rights are protected by the constitution, our laws and by international law.”
The habeas corpus petition in question was filed by Rita Manchanda seeking information on the location of five Rohingya illegal immigrants who could not be traced after being detained – a request opposed by solicitor general Tushar Mehta.
“Where is the order of the Government of India declaring them [Rohingyas] as refugees? Refugee is a well defined legal term and there is a prescribed authority by the Government to declare them. If there is no legal status of a refugee, and somebody is an intruder, and he enters illegally, do we have an obligation to keep that fellow here?” Justice Surya Kant was quoted as saying by Live Law during the hearing.
Further, the CJI said, “Once these illegal migrants are in India, they claim right to food and shelter and help for their children. We have many poor people in the country. They have a right over the country’s resources, not the illegal migrants. True, the illegal migrants cannot be subjected to custodial torture.”
The signatories include former judges Justice A.P. Shah, Justice K. Chandru and Justice Anjana Prakash; senior legal figures such as Mohan Gopal, Rajeev Dhavan, Chander Uday Singh, Colin Gonsalves, Kamini Jaiswal, Mihir Desai, Gopal Shankar Narayan, Gautam Bhatia, Shahrukh Alam; and CJAR members and activists such as Prashant Bhushan, Nikhil Dey, Anjali Bhardwaj, Amrita Johri, Apar Gupta, Vipul Mudgal, Beena Pallical, Annie Raja, Meera Sanghamitra, among others.
The signatories argued that invoking domestic poverty to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent” and reasserted that the Rohingyas, like any person in India, are protected under Article 21. Citing NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh (1996), they reminded the court that “the state is bound to protect the life and liberty of every human being, be he a citizen or otherwise.”
“Further, invoking the plight of the poor in India to justify denying protections to refugees sets a dangerous precedent, being contrary to the principles of constitutional justice. The Rohingya, as indeed any person residing in India, is entitled to the protections of Article 21 and not just protections from “third degree measures”. This fundamental right is available to an individual who is a citizen or any other person residing in India,” the signatories wrote.
They noted that the Rohingyas have been described by the United Nations as “the most persecuted minority in the world” and are fleeing “ethnic cleansing and genocide.” Comparing them to intruders, they argued, “weakens the moral authority of the judiciary.”
“They are an ethnic minority in Buddhist majority Myanmar who have endured decades of violence and discrimination. Denied citizenship, the Rohingya are stateless. They have fled to neighbouring countries in waves over the past many years, escaping what has been described by the International Court of Justice as ethnic cleansing and genocide at the hands of the armed forces. They are fleeing to India, like centuries of refugees before them, seeking basic safety,” the letter mentioned.
Further, the letter stressed that refugee status determination is declaratory and that India’s own Standard Operating Procedure for Foreign Nationals Claiming to be Refugees aligns with international law. Refoulement without due process, the signatories argued, violates Article 21.
“Any refoulment, imprisonment or detention without having individually and formally determined their claim as a refugee, is therefore illegal. It is gutting the right to non-refoulment which the Courts have held to be a part of Article 21,” the letter mentioned.
The signatories recalled India’s long history of hosting Tibetan, Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi refugees and noted that the country has always treated refugees as occupying a “qualitatively different status” from migrants.
Appeal to the CJI
Addressing Chief Justice Surya Kant, the signatories wrote: “Your words carry weight not simply in the courtroom but in the conscience of the nation and have a cascading effect on the high courts, the lower judiciary and other government authorities.”
They warned that rhetoric hostile to the dignity of persecuted groups “threatens the foundational values of our constitution” and risks eroding public trust in the judiciary’s ability to protect the vulnerable.
They urged the CJI to reaffirm “in public statements, remarks in court and judicial verdicts” the judiciary’s commitment to constitutional morality, human dignity and justice “regardless of origin.”
“The majesty of the Supreme Court and your office is measured not merely by the number of verdicts or administrative measures but more by the humanity with which those verdicts are delivered and considered,” the letter stated.
Myanmar shares a border with China why don’t they go there.The law according to you - right to safe passage to the nearest safe country
Bangladesh is nearer to Myanmar than India. So the question is still valid - why they seeking refuge in India and not their homeland in Bangladesh?
What these guys like @finalfantasy7 fail to understand is these dramebaazis no longer works in India. It been the case since 2014. One would presume by now they would have gotten used to it. However, they are still crying and whining after 11 years.Ngo judges now trying to put pressure on Cji
This will not work any more
The citizens are fed up of these NGOs
Illegal. Immigrants will no be allowed to live in India and NGOs won’t be able to stop their deportation.
What these guys like @finalfantasy7 fail to understand is these dramebaazis no longer works in India. It been the case since 2014. One would presume by now they would have gotten used to it. However, they are still crying and whining after 11 years.
Rohingya is not India's problem and India is under no obligation to take any refugees.
they've arrived at your shores, not china, if they were at china border, then yes china should take them inMyanmar shares a border with China why don’t they go there.
Why should Indians pay the price of a myanmarese ethnic problem
India has the obligation to take them in, as they have arrived into India, - can you not read the UN - refugeesWhat these guys like @finalfantasy7 fail to understand is these dramebaazis no longer works in India. It been the case since 2014. One would presume by now they would have gotten used to it. However, they are still crying and whining after 11 years.
Rohingya is not India's problem and India is under no obligation to take any refugees.
No. India is not legally obligated to take refugees because it hasn't signed the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, so it lacks a national refugee law. Continue your spamming...dont argue with me who will challenge and expose you.India has the obligation to take them in, as they have arrived into India, - can you not read the UN - refugees
not that many people champ, more indians have illegally imigrated out from india in last 6hrs than the bengalis entered......
All illegals must be kicked out. It does not matter whether it is in India or the west.not that many people champ, more indians have illegally imigrated out from india in last 6hrs than the bengalis entered......
![]()
Over 1,000 Indians crossed into UK illegally, over 5,000 applied for asylum in 2023: Data
Surge in Indian migrants crossing English Channel to U.K. for jobs and asylum sparks political debate.www.thehindu.com
wheres your outrage????
@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980
#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus
#SaveAllIndianMinorities
#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism
#SanctionIndiaIndians

not that many people champ, more indians have illegally imigrated out from india in last 6hrs than the bengalis entered......
![]()
Over 1,000 Indians crossed into UK illegally, over 5,000 applied for asylum in 2023: Data
Surge in Indian migrants crossing English Channel to U.K. for jobs and asylum sparks political debate.www.thehindu.com
wheres your outrage????
@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980
#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus
#SaveAllIndianMinorities
#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism
#SanctionIndiaIndians

All illegals must be kicked out. It does not matter whether it is in India or the west.
The issue I am pointing out is the illegal Bangladeshis encroaching into India. They all need to be booted out of India asap. Many of them could be Islamic radicals.![]()
mcb.org.uk