What's new

Illegal Bangladeshi and Rohingya encroachers in India

Weren't Rohingyas originally from Bengal before it was partitioned? How would you know if they were from Indian Bengal or Bangladesh? :unsure:
 
While I oppose illegal immigration no matter where it happens, illegal Bangladeshis can perhaps play a role in future balkanization of India. We have to look at the bigger picture.

BTW, India also exports tons of illegal Indians worldwide. There are over 700k illegal Indians in USA, for example ---> https://www.livemint.com/news/us-ne...-what-happens-to-them-now-11737876868677.html.

India should ensure they don't send in illegal Indians worldwide -->
:inti:inti:inti
 
Not happy with the pace of deportation.

We are talking about hundreds here, not even thousands when close 50 million illegal Bangladeshiz live in Bharat minimum who came here over decades and got local identification cards illegally. They all should be identified and sent back gradually. We don’t want Bangladeshi beggars in our country.
 
Bangladeshi blue collar types are hired by Swiggy in Bangalore and I just had my lunch delivered by one.

I'm sure majority are just looking to make ends meet but in a country where there is already massive poverty and unemployment, there can be no sympathy for them .

They have to be deported and jobs given only to Indian citizens.
 
Good to see them being thrown out of Assam. Nobody hates Bangladeshis more than North East Indians. They are less welcome than vermin in those states.
 
assam will be the next muslim majority state of india, im guessing it'll take another 15 years or so, but a combination of reproductive trends and immigration will see to it. Once the latest census figures drop people will have a better idea.
 
assam will be the next muslim majority state of india, im guessing it'll take another 15 years or so, but a combination of reproductive trends and immigration will see to it. Once the latest census figures drop people will have a better idea.

Assam should've been a part of Bangladesh. Maybe it can happen in the future. :inti
 
We need to help create Greater Bangladesh absorb assam and west bengal into Bangladesh.
 
Congrats to our Bangladeshi brothers. Overwhelm these Indians and kick them into the sea (metaphorically). Send wave after wave.
 
Congrats to our Bangladeshi brothers. Overwhelm these Indians and kick them into the sea (metaphorically). Send wave after wave.

Bro, don't encourage this, you know once the Bangladeshi illegal migrants start causing major trouble in Bharat they will get slaughtered left right and centre, Mamata Ammayi is not going to be around for much longer..
 
assam will be the next muslim majority state of india, im guessing it'll take another 15 years or so, but a combination of reproductive trends and immigration will see to it. Once the latest census figures drop people will have a better idea.
Hope not...the mere thought of it sound scary. As the history shows, where ever the Muslim's are in majority, they tend to become trouble makers. The state of Assam is brilliant as it is with lovely tea gardens and picturesque landscapes. Lets hope it doesn't get polluted with that thing.
 
Bro, don't encourage this, you know once the Bangladeshi illegal migrants start causing major trouble in Bharat they will get slaughtered left right and centre, Mamata Ammayi is not going to be around for much longer..
In that case ummah starts .so better to throw all the illegal immigrants
 
Hope not...the mere thought of it sound scary. As the history shows, where ever the Muslim's are in majority, they tend to become trouble makers. The state of Assam is brilliant as it is with lovely tea gardens and picturesque landscapes. Lets hope it doesn't get polluted with that thing.
sounds like sylhet, my sylhetti friend says the hill regions have more in common with assam than with the delta regions of central Bangladesh. its not a matter of hope, the demographic trends will be confirmed once census data is revealed but in the last 15 years Muslim proportion has pbly gone from 35% to 42, or 43%, which means another 15 years will be the tipping point. also once regions start become Muslim majority hindus will pbly start leaving for other places, exacerbating the trend.
 
once regions start become Muslim majority hindus will pbly start leaving for other places, exacerbating the trend.

This I agree with, once the converts are in the majority in the subcontinent it's game over for people of other religious beliefs..

Also the converts will see to it that the land they are occupying goes right down the gutter another specialty of theirs, quite a skill...
 
This I agree with, once the converts are in the majority in the subcontinent it's game over for people of other religious beliefs..

Also the converts will see to it that the land they are occupying goes right down the gutter another specialty of theirs, quite a skill...
its a demographic trend you cannot fight, the family structure in Islam promotes having babies, even educated working Muslim women in the west aspire to having babies and families, i know Muslim working women who have good jobs and money yet still have 3 or 4 kids, this is virtually unheard of in non-muslim circles in the west now.

the non Muslim social structure in india will fall apart once enough women are educated, the non Muslim birth rate will plummet like the rest of the world, significant parts of india will be Muslim majority by the turn of the next century. and once they hit a critical mass where they realise they can exert political influence, especially funded and encouraged by various external Muslim influences, Iran, saudi, etc, india will get blindsided by rapid islamification of the political landscape.

the idea of secessionist movements will go out the window when Muslims realise they will have democratic influence over the whole of india, much like the religious parties of india abhored jinnah for splitting an india they believed they had divine mandate to rule over.
 
sounds like sylhet, my sylhetti friend says the hill regions have more in common with assam than with the delta regions of central Bangladesh. its not a matter of hope, the demographic trends will be confirmed once census data is revealed but in the last 15 years Muslim proportion has pbly gone from 35% to 42, or 43%, which means another 15 years will be the tipping point. also once regions start become Muslim majority hindus will pbly start leaving for other places, exacerbating the trend.

Assamese Muslims are significantly more rural , the women far less educated than Hindu and tribal Christian Assamese and that explains the TFR differential between Assamese Muslims and others.

However, much like everywhere else in India, the TFR of Assamese Muslims crashed from 3.6 to 2.4 from 2006 to 2021 and is just replacement now.

It's a trend that mirrors that of Muslims everywhere in India with Indian Muslim TFR expected to be exactly at replacement level at 2.1 in 2025.
 
the non Muslim social structure in india will fall apart once enough women are educated, the non Muslim birth rate will plummet like the rest of the world, significant parts of india will be Muslim majority by the turn of the next century. and once they hit a critical mass where they realise they can exert political influence, especially funded and encouraged by various external Muslim influences, Iran, saudi, etc, india will get blindsided by rapid islamification of the political landscape.

Ok now you lost your mind, must be the muslim intellect kicking in..
 
assam will be the next muslim majority state of india, im guessing it'll take another 15 years or so, but a combination of reproductive trends and immigration will see to it. Once the latest census figures drop people will have a better idea.
Illegal immigration
 
its a demographic trend you cannot fight, the family structure in Islam promotes having babies, even educated working Muslim women in the west aspire to having babies and families, i know Muslim working women who have good jobs and money yet still have 3 or 4 kids, this is virtually unheard of in non-muslim circles in the west now.

the non Muslim social structure in india will fall apart once enough women are educated, the non Muslim birth rate will plummet like the rest of the world, significant parts of india will be Muslim majority by the turn of the next century. and once they hit a critical mass where they realise they can exert political influence, especially funded and encouraged by various external Muslim influences, Iran, saudi, etc, india will get blindsided by rapid islamification of the political landscape.

the idea of secessionist movements will go out the window when Muslims realise they will have democratic influence over the whole of india, much like the religious parties of india abhored jinnah for splitting an india they believed they had divine mandate to rule over.
Easy solution. stop giving handouts.

Muslims in general don't care for education and rely on government handouts.

bigger family=less food for each kid=weak adult

easy to deal with
 
i like the variance in replies from the indian posters, first time ive seen that in a long time, from no its not happening, to its happening because of illegal immigration, to hand outs, to talks of genocide. its speculative so theres no point in arguing details, but assam will be a majority Muslim state by 2060 at the latest, and west bengal by 2080 to 2090. we pbly not gonna be alive to see the latter happen, but it definitely will.

once we have the census data for 2024 it will be a lot more accurate to see how this trend will play out. and we will have a better idea of when these things will happen.
 
i like the variance in replies from the indian posters, first time ive seen that in a long time, from no its not happening, to its happening because of illegal immigration, to hand outs, to talks of genocide. its speculative so theres no point in arguing details, but assam will be a majority Muslim state by 2060 at the latest, and west bengal by 2080 to 2090. we pbly not gonna be alive to see the latter happen, but it definitely will.

once we have the census data for 2024 it will be a lot more accurate to see how this trend will play out. and we will have a better idea of when these things will happen.

Speculation based on what data though? Immigration from Bangladesh has certainly skewed the numbers in Assam but where is the data to show that West Bengal will be Muslim majority any time in this century if at all?
 
Speculation based on what data though? Immigration from Bangladesh has certainly skewed the numbers in Assam but where is the data to show that West Bengal will be Muslim majority any time in this century if at all?
The extrapolation of the increase in muslim population across the country would take Muslim population percentage to close to 45% in west bengal in 60 to 70 years, then immigration from Bangladesh, plus hindu flight could realistically see a Muslim majority. again if the latest census data shows that this growth is much lower or higher then it will happen much later or sooner, respectively.
 
The extrapolation of the increase in muslim population across the country would take Muslim population percentage to close to 45% in west bengal in 60 to 70 years, then immigration from Bangladesh, plus hindu flight could realistically see a Muslim majority. again if the latest census data shows that this growth is much lower or higher then it will happen much later or sooner, respectively.

The extrapolation of Muslim population across the country would not account for such a significant change anytime soon , if at all.

I have already stated that the Muslim TFR is normalising to the levels of Hindu TFR at a very rapid pace. In 2025 , the latest National Health and Family Survey will confirm that TFR of Indian Muslims is at 2.1.

The census is not necessary for that. The significant growth in border districts of Assam and West Bengal Muslims is almost entirely driven by immigration from Bangladesh.

There is a case for Assam becoming Muslim majority of immigration continues at this rate but I don't see any evidence for that of West Bengal.

Despite not correcting for immigration, West Bengal's Muslim TFR is still slightly lower than replacement.

In the last 30 years, Indian Muslim TFR has crashed much faster than Hindu TFR and it's shown no sign of relenting.

Hindu flight is unlikely to happen because concentration of Muslims happens only in a few districts - I believe it's restricted to 5 or 6 districts in Assam.
 
'India put us on the boat like captives - then threw us in the sea'

Noorul Amin last spoke to his brother on 9 May. The call was brief, but the news was devastating.

He learned that his brother, Kairul, and four other relatives were among 40 Rohingya refugees allegedly deported by the Indian government to Myanmar, a country they had fled in fear years ago.

Myanmar is in the midst of a brutal civil war between the junta - which seized power in a 2021 coup - and ethnic militias and resistance forces.

The odds that Mr Amin will ever see his family again are vanishingly small.

"I could not process the torment that my parents and the others who were taken are facing," Mr Amin, 24, told the BBC in Delhi.

Three months after they were removed from India's capital, the BBC managed to contact the refugees in Myanmar. Most are staying with the Ba Htoo Army (BHA), a resistance group fighting the military in the south-west of the country.

"We don't feel secure in Myanmar. This place is a complete war zone," said Soyed Noor on a video call made from the phone of a BHA member. He spoke from a wooden shelter with six other refugees around him.

The BBC gathered testimonies from the refugees and accounts from relatives in Delhi and spoke to experts investigating the allegations to piece together what happened to them.

We have learnt that they were flown from Delhi to an island in the Bay of Bengal, put on a naval vessel and eventually forced into the Andaman Sea with life jackets. They then made their way to shore and are now facing an uncertain future in Myanmar, which the mostly-Muslim Rohingya community had fled in huge numbers in recent years to escape persecution.

"They bound our hands, covered our faces and brought us like captives [on to the boat]. Then they threw us in the sea," John, one of the men in the group, told his brother by phone soon after reaching land.

"How can someone just throw human beings into the sea?" asked Mr Amin. "There is humanity alive in the world but I have not seen any humanity in the Indian government."

Thomas Andrews, the UN's special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, says there is "significant evidence" proving these allegations, which he has presented to India's head of mission in Geneva but has yet to receive a response.

The BBC has also contacted India's Ministry of External Affairs several times but had not heard back by time of publication.

Campaigners have often flagged that the condition of Rohingya in India is precarious. India does not recognise the Rohingya as refugees but rather, as illegal immigrants under the country's Foreigners Act.

India has a sizeable population of Rohingya refugees, although Bangladesh, where more than a million live, has the biggest number. Most fled Myanmar after a deadly army crackdown in 2017. Despite having lived there for generations, Rohingya are not recognised in Myanmar as citizens.

There are 23,800 Rohingya refugees in India registered with the UNHCR, the UN's refugee agency. But Human Rights Watch estimates that the actual number is upwards of 40,000.

On 6 May the 40 Rohingya refugees, who had UNHCR refugee cards and lived in different parts of Delhi, were taken to their local police stations under the guise of collecting biometric data. This is a yearly process mandated by the Indian government where Rohingya refugees are photographed and fingerprinted. After several hours they were taken to the Inderlok Detention Centre in the city, they told the BBC.

Mr Amin says his brother called him then and told him he was being taken to Myanmar, and asked him to get a lawyer and alert the UNHCR.

On 7 May, the refugees said they were taken to Hindon airport, just east of Delhi, where they boarded planes to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, an Indian territory in the Bay of Bengal.

"After getting off the plane, we saw that two buses had come to receive us," said Mr Noor on the video call. He added he could see the words "Bhartiya Nausena" written on the side of the buses, the Hindi term referring to the Indian Navy.

"As soon as we got to the bus, they bound our hands with some plastic material and covered our face with a black muslin cloth," he said.

Although the people on the buses did not identify themselves, they were dressed in military fatigues and were speaking Hindi.

After a short bus ride, the group boarded a naval vessel in the Bay of Bengal, which Mr Noor said they only realised later once their hands had been untied and their faces uncovered.

They describe the vessel as a large warship with two floors, at least 150m (490 feet) in length.

"Many of [the people on the ship] were wearing T-shirts, black-coloured trousers and black army boots," said Mohammad Sajjad, who was on the call with Mr Noor. "They weren't all wearing the same thing - some in black, some in brown."

Mr Noor says that the group was on the naval vessel for 14 hours. They were given meals regularly, traditional Indian fare of rice, lentils and paneer (cheese).

Some of the men say they were subjected to violence and humiliation on the ship.

"We were treated very badly," said Mr Noor. "Some were beaten very badly. They were slapped multiple times."

On the video call, Foyaz Ullah showed the scars on his right wrist, and described repeatedly being punched and slapped on his back and face, and poked with a bamboo rod.

"They asked me why I was in India illegally, why are you here?"

The Rohingya are a predominantly Muslim ethnic community but of the 40 people forcibly returned in May, 15 are Christian.

Those detaining them on their journey from Delhi would even say, "'why didn't you become Hindu? Why did you convert from Islam to Christianity?'," said Mr Noor. "They even made us pull down our pants to see if we are circumcised or not."

Another refugee, Eman Hussain, said the military personnel accused him of being involved in the Pahalgam massacre, referring to a 22 April attack where 26 civilians, mostly Hindu tourists, were shot dead by militants in Indian-administered Kashmir.

The Indian government has repeatedly accused Pakistani nationals of carrying out the attacks, a claim Islamabad denies. There's been no suggestion that Rohingya had any link to the shootings.

The next day, on 8 May, at about 19:00 local time (12:30 GMT), the refugees were told to climb down a ladder on the side of the naval vessel. Below, they described seeing four smaller rescue boats, black and made of rubber.

The refugees were made to board two of the boats, 20 on each and accompanied by several of the people transporting them. The two other boats, which led the way, had more than a dozen personnel on them. For more than seven hours, they travelled with their hands tied.

"One of the boats with the military personnel reached the seashore and tied a long rope to a tree. That rope was then brought to the boats," Mr Noor said.

He said they were given life jackets, their hands were untied - and they were told to jump into the water. "We held on to the rope and swam more than 100m to get to the shore," he said, adding that they were told that they had reached Indonesia.

Then the people who'd taken them there left.

The BBC put these allegations to the Indian government and the Indian Navy, and have not received a response.

In the early hours of 9 May, the group was found by local fishermen who told them they were in Myanmar. They let the refugees use their phones to call their relatives in India.

For more than three months, the BHA has been assisting the stranded refugees by providing food and shelter, in the Tanintharyi region of Myanmar. But their families in India are terrified about their fate in Myanmar.

The UN says the lives of Rohingya refugees "were put at extreme risk when Indian authorities forced [them] into the Andaman Sea".

"I've been personally researching this very disturbing case," said Mr Andrews. He admitted the amount of information he could share was limited, but that he had also "spoken with eyewitnesses and been able to corroborate those reports and establish that they are based in fact".

On 17 May, Mr Amin and another family member of the refugees who were removed filed a petition urging India's Supreme Court to bring them back to Delhi, immediately stop similar deportations and offer compensation to all 40 individuals.

"It opened up the country to the awfulness of the Rohingya deportation," says Colin Gonsalves, a senior advocate in the Supreme Court who is arguing on behalf of the petitioners.

"That you can drop a person in the sea with a life jacket in a war zone was something people automatically chose to disbelieve," Mr Gonsalves said.

In response to the petition, one Supreme Court judge on the two-judge bench called the allegations "fanciful ideas". He also said the prosecution had not provided enough evidence to substantiate their claims.

Since then, the court has agreed to hear arguments on 29 September to decide whether the Rohingya can be treated as refugees or if they are illegal immigrants and therefore subject to deportations.

Considering that tens of thousands of Rohingya refugees are living in India, it's not clear why so much effort was devoted to deporting these 40 people.

"Nobody in India can understand why they did it, apart from this venom against Muslims," said Mr Gonsalves.

The treatment of the refugees has sent a chill throughout the Rohingya community in India. In the past year, its members claim there has been an increase in deportations by the Indian authorities. There are no official figures to confirm this.

Some have gone into hiding. Others like Mr Amin no longer sleep at home. He has sent his wife and three children elsewhere.

"In my heart there is only this fear that the Indian government will take us also and throw us in the sea anytime. And now we are scared to even step out of our homes," Mr Amin said.

"These are people who are in India not because they want to be," said Mr Andrews from the UN.

"They're there because of the horrific violence that is occurring in Myanmar. They literally have been running for their lives."

BBC
 
Pakistan should take in all these Rohingyas. After all, their formation was to protect Muslims in subcontinent from Hindu oppression.
India under terrorist Modi is no place for these Rohingyas. Illegal Bangladeshis and Rohingyas are everywhere in India. They get exploited and form the cheapest labor.
 

Odisha says it has deported 49 ‘illegal Bangladeshis’ since May​

Comes amid state government’s intensified crackdown on orders from the Ministry of Home Affairs​


As many as 49 illegal Bangladeshi immigrants have been deported from Odisha since May, with cases registered against two of them for forging passports, the state government has said.

Informing the state assembly in a written reply, Odisha Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi said Monday that a special task force has been constituted by the state government to take action against illegal Bangladeshi infiltrators. SPs of various districts have also been asked to intensify the drive against undocumented migrants from Bangladesh and Myanmar, the minister said.

This comes amid the state government’s crackdown on “illegal” immigrants on orders from the Ministry of Home affairs. The detentions have been a political flashpoint in the past, with West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s TMC objecting to the “harassment” of Bengali-speaking migrants.

According to official sources, the 49 persons who have been deported so far were identified from Bhubaneswar, Cuttack, Berhampur and Kandhamal districts.

The chief minister informed the assembly that his government has been regularly following up the identification of illegal infiltrators with police in various districts, while work is also being done in coordination with central agencies like the Intelligence Bureau.

Senior police officers have been asked to visit districts with the most suspected cases, especially in the northern and coastal regions, and coordinate with agencies from the Union government and neighbouring states, the CM told the House.

 
Use this thread to post the Bangladeshi illegal menace in India.

@sweep_shot , what do you think of your fellow country men entering India risking their lives? How pathetic is your country considering you keep saying India is a hell hole for Muslims?
 
I sometimes feel bad when I see the videos of Bangladeshi’s crying when their illegal homes are demolished. As much as I can see their pain, India has lot of mouths to feed and so, we cannot have illegal migrants from Bangladesh.

And if they are as extreme as the Bangladeshi poster here, then we need to throw them out even faster.

The problem is they hide in areas that are basically no-go-zones for Policemen. The mob mentality among Muslims in India is the highest and so, even if police try to remove them peacefully, the mobs gets involved. Need some extreme measures to solve this issue.
 
I am normally against illegals. I want all illegal Indians out of North America, for example. Indians are the third largest group of illegals in USA.:inti

Having said that, illegal Bangladeshis in India may have a crucial job to do. They can contribute to the eventual balkanization of India.

I have always maintained a balkanized and smaller India is good for subcontinent. :dav
 
I am normally against illegals. I want all illegal Indians out of North America, for example. Indians are the third largest group of illegals in USA.:inti

Having said that, illegal Bangladeshis in India may have a crucial job to do. They can contribute to the eventual balkanization of India.

I have always maintained the smaller India become, the more peaceful subcontinent can become. :inti
This is exactly the reason why Bangladeshi must he thrown out. No country wants immigrants behaving like this but people with this type of terrorist mentality bring harm to the host country by behaving like pests in a healthy crop. They neither have integrity nor loyalty. Such a menace.
 
More of these buggers below.

6 incidents of Illegal Bangladeshis being arrested in the last 10 days: Smuggling, fake visa, illegal stay, and more
1764649236639.jpeg


The influx of illegal immigrants into India via Bangladesh continues. The illegal immigrants enter India, obtain fake identity documents at times, and also engage in illegal activities. There have been many cases in the past when these illegal immigrants were found involved in human trafficking rackets, illegal drug trade, and other criminal activities involving theft, assault, and other cases.

Despite the Indian government’s efforts and actions, the constant rush of illegal immigrants into India through Bangladesh continues. In the past ten days, several such cases have been reported from various parts of the country where the Bangladeshi happened to illegally enter India. However, the immigrants were identified and immediately nabbed by the Indian administration.

5 illegal immigrants arrested from Navi Mumbai​

Recently, on 31st March, the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) announced the arrest of five Bangladeshi nationals in Navi Mumbai for illegally entering and staying in India without proper documents. The arrested persons were identified as Aahat Jamal Sheikh (22), Rebul Samad Sheikh (40), Ronney Soriful Khan (25), Julu Billal Sharif (28) and Mohammad Munir Mohammad Siraj Mulla (49).

An ATS official stated that they received a tip-off and that the Vikhroli unit conducted an operation in two sites in Ghansoli, Navi Mumbai. During the operation, five Bangladeshis were detained in Ghansoli’s Janai Compound and Shivaji Talao area.

5 illegal immigrants arrested from Navi Mumbai​

Recently, on 31st March, the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) announced the arrest of five Bangladeshi nationals in Navi Mumbai for illegally entering and staying in India without proper documents. The arrested persons were identified as Aahat Jamal Sheikh (22), Rebul Samad Sheikh (40), Ronney Soriful Khan (25), Julu Billal Sharif (28) and Mohammad Munir Mohammad Siraj Mulla (49).

An ATS official stated that they received a tip-off and that the Vikhroli unit conducted an operation in two sites in Ghansoli, Navi Mumbai. During the operation, five Bangladeshis were detained in Ghansoli’s Janai Compound and Shivaji Talao area.

As per the reports, none had legitimate documents or a permit to live in India, but they worked as masons in Navi Mumbai. The immigrants were arrested under the provisions of the Foreigners Act of 1946 and the Passport (Entry into India) Rules of 1950.

Illegal Bangladeshi arrested from Assam, was involved in fake ‘healing’ practices​

On the very same day, 31st March, Mankachar police in Assam nabbed an illegal Bangladeshi national who had been living in the area for eight months. The suspect was identified as Osama Bin Hasan Sajib, son of Manzoorul Hasan from Veluya village in Sherpur district, Bangladesh, and was found hiding at Khalilur Miah’s home in Jhanjhani village, Mankachar.

According to reports, Sajib crossed the border into Mankachar from Mahendraganj, Meghalaya, some eight months ago. During his stay, he practiced ‘faith healing’ in Mankasar and other areas in Meghalaya.

1764649409213.jpeg
Sajib
arrested by Assam Police (Image- India Today NE)
The Mankachar Police also conducted a raid based on information provided by the local Village Defence Party (VDP), after which Osama Bin Hasan Sajib, a Bangladeshi national, was arrested. Khalilur Miah, who had harbored the illegal immigrant, was subsequently arrested.

A more worrisome revelation surfaced when police discovered a scheme devised by Khalilur Miah and his son, Mofidul Islam, to aid the illegal acquisition of an Indian identity card for Bangladeshi national Osama Bin Hasan Sajib. Mofidul Islam is currently fleeing arrest.

7 illegal Bangladeshi arrested in Tripura​

On Saturday (23rd March), the Railway Police at Agartala Station arrested seven Bangladeshi nationals, including two women and a ten-month-old baby, for illegally entering India. The Officer-in-Charge of Government Railway Police at Badharghat, Tapas Das revealed that two of the detainees had dressed themselves as women, presumably to conceal their identities.

During interrogation, the illegal infiltrators confessed that all of them were Bangladeshi citizens. According to Das, these arrests bring the total number of Bangladeshi nationals apprehended from Agartala Railway Station to over 20.

1764649599394.jpeg

1764649625606.jpeg

Five illegal Bangladeshi’s arrested from Agra, UP​

On 21st March, the Uttar Pradesh Police apprehended five Bangladeshi nationals, including two women, during an aggressive search in the city of Agra. The five illegal immigrants lived in Thana Tajganj and had been in the nation for the past three years.

It was revealed that an individual named Azizul Ghazi brought them to India, and after being detained, Ghazi and his wife Jannat assumed the entire liability for transporting them across the border in exchange for money.

1764649710779.jpeg
Arrested illegal immigrants (India Today)
They were found in possession of fake Aadhaar cards, mobile phones, railway tickets, and more. Jannat Begum’s passport has also been retrieved. The action by Agra Police was taken after being instructed to search by the Commissioner of Police Preetinder Singh.

2 Bangladeshis held for operating visa racket in New Delhi​

This specific incident happened on 10th March but it is important to highlight this given its severity. Two Bangladeshi nationals, one of whom worked as an agent for two embassies, were arrested on 10th March for allegedly participating in a visa scheme. Mohammad Akidul Islam (20) was accused of converting a medical visa to India into a tourist visa to obtain a Romanian visa. The incident came to the fore after one of the Romanian Embassy officials filed a complaint against someone who applied for a visa using fraudulent documents.
 
I am normally against illegals. I want all illegal Indians out of North America, for example. Indians are the third largest group of illegals in USA.:inti

Having said that, illegal Bangladeshis in India may have a crucial job to do. They can contribute to the eventual balkanization of India.

I have always maintained a balkanized and smaller India is good for subcontinent.

Having said that, I don't know why a small percentage of Bangladeshis illegally migrate to India.

I mean India is a dirty smelly unappealing 3rd world country. Why go there? Why not go to other countries like other Bangladeshis? :inti

Anyway, they may eventually contribute to India's balkanization. That can be seen as a positive.

From military point of view, they are long-term assets/benevolent trojan horses. :inti
 
I am normally against illegals. I want all illegal Indians out of North America, for example. Indians are the third largest group of illegals in USA.:inti

Having said that, illegal Bangladeshis in India may have a crucial job to do. They can contribute to the eventual balkanization of India.

I have always maintained a balkanized and smaller India is good for subcontinent. :dav
Thanks for saying the eventual dastardly plans of these illegal Bangladeshis in India.

If they are anything like you, I hope Indian police give them the good old beating before throwing them out of the country :cobra
 
Having said that, I don't know why a small percentage of Bangladeshis illegally migrate to India.

I mean India is a dirty smelly unappealing 3rd world country. Why go there? Why not go to other countries like other Bangladeshis? :inti

Anyway, they may eventually contribute to India's balkanization. That can be seen as a positive.

From military point of view, they are long-term assets/benevolent trojan horses. :inti
Small percentage? There are an estimated 2 crore Bangladeshis in India. That is like 12-13% of your entire BD population. This number was from 2016. I am sure that number has doubled since then.

Guess what, these people have no education and no access to toilets either. Basically defecating in the open and then doing menial jobs to send back a few rupees back to their families in BD.

While I feel bad for these illegals and their plight, it shows how poor BD is. :mv

You might think why BD people enter India illegally.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My state Assam and @cricketjoshila 's state West Bengal have been the biggest victims of those blood sucking, dirty and unhygienic parasites from Bangladesh who are living illegally in my country. Every time I see bulldozer justice being meted out to those parasites, it brings such a sick, sadistic smile on my face.​
 
Need to deport every illegal immigrant, we are way too over populated and under developed (compared to population) to host any illegal immigrants.

There is too much noise and too little action by governments, this should be one of the priority tasks of governments across centre and states.
 
I’m concerned about the involvement in terror related activities, otherwise I feel that we must as a nation rethink our stand on this issue.

Cheap labour is a boon for any developing industrialised nation and through our own massive population and a low income Bangladesh next door, India has access to the biggest cheap labour pool in the world right now. Onus is on us actually to utilise this to our benefit. If we are able to do that it will take our economy right to the top very quicker than we thought was possible.
 
I’m concerned about the involvement in terror related activities, otherwise I feel that we must as a nation rethink our stand on this issue.

Cheap labour is a boon for any developing industrialised nation and through our own massive population and a low income Bangladesh next door, India has access to the biggest cheap labour pool in the world right now. Onus is on us actually to utilise this to our benefit. If we are able to do that it will take our economy right to the top very quicker than we thought was possible.

The PM, Amit Shah and rest of the BJP is all talk. They have done a sweet jack all regarding the roach infestation that is coming from that gutter called Bangladesh....

Call a spade a spade, I have more confidence in my Ammayi Sonya's son than the BJP government to tackle the roach infestation....
 
Having said that, I don't know why a small percentage of Bangladeshis illegally migrate to India.

I mean India is a dirty smelly unappealing 3rd world country. Why go there? Why not go to other countries like other Bangladeshis? :inti

Anyway, they may eventually contribute to India's balkanization. That can be seen as a positive.

From military point of view, they are long-term assets/benevolent trojan horses. :inti
They will be dealt on the streets if they try anything thats against indian interests
 
The PM, Amit Shah and rest of the BJP is all talk. They have done a sweet jack all regarding the roach infestation that is coming from that gutter called Bangladesh....

Call a spade a spade, I have more confidence in my Ammayi Sonya's son than the BJP government to tackle the roach infestation....

What we need is a NRC implemented and all the Bangladeshi, Rohingya immigrants identified and timely monitored. Let them join the workforce however. It’s a boost to our industry. Truth is many local Indians don’t wanna work for low wage. Look at Punjab where all these jatts do nothing but won’t ever go to factory to labour. Look at our metro cities, mostly working couples now in every household, they can’t function without multiple domestic helps.
 
I’m concerned about the involvement in terror related activities, otherwise I feel that we must as a nation rethink our stand on this issue.

Cheap labour is a boon for any developing industrialised nation and through our own massive population and a low income Bangladesh next door, India has access to the biggest cheap labour pool in the world right now. Onus is on us actually to utilise this to our benefit. If we are able to do that it will take our economy right to the top very quicker than we thought was possible.


This is why I respect you bro, you are the only one who speaks as a true Bharati. Indians with a bigger vision would never accept the carving up of their land by the British Raj, they would claim ALL of India pre British colonialism.

The rest of the Indians whining about Bangladeshi "immigrants" are conquered mental midgets. I salute you.

:salute
 
What we need is a NRC implemented and all the Bangladeshi, Rohingya immigrants identified and timely monitored. Let them join the workforce however. It’s a boost to our industry. Truth is many local Indians don’t wanna work for low wage. Look at Punjab where all these jatts do nothing but won’t ever go to factory to labour. Look at our metro cities, mostly working couples now in every household, they can’t function without multiple domestic helps.
Agreed. But Bangladeshis should never be given citizenship etc. here.
 
What we need is a NRC implemented and all the Bangladeshi, Rohingya immigrants identified and timely monitored. Let them join the workforce however. It’s a boost to our industry. Truth is many local Indians don’t wanna work for low wage. Look at Punjab where all these jatts do nothing but won’t ever go to factory to labour. Look at our metro cities, mostly working couples now in every household, they can’t function without multiple domestic helps.
The present SIR is a backdoor nrc

No voting rights means no political support
 

'India put us on the boat like captives - then threw us in the sea​




disgusting by the indians - how can you forceully push them out
 

'India put us on the boat like captives - then threw us in the sea​




disgusting by the indians - how can you forceully push them out
Because they have no right to be in India.this is only the start, illegal immigrants will be dealt this way only
 

'India put us on the boat like captives - then threw us in the sea​




disgusting by the indians - how can you forceully push them out
Excellent work by India.

I also said the same when USA packed illegal Indians on a plane and send them back to India.
 
Excellent work by India.

I also said the same when USA packed illegal Indians on a plane and send them back to India.
Read my post above this,


the indians your refrerring to, broke the law, these refugees havent
 
Read my post above this,


the indians your refrerring to, broke the law, these refugees havent
No law is broken. Illegal immigrants are not allowed in any country.

Why dont they take refuge in Bangladesh? That is nearer from Myanmar than India right?
 
No law is broken. Illegal immigrants are not allowed in any country.

Why dont they take refuge in Bangladesh? That is nearer from Myanmar than India right?
they are, if thr seeking refuge from civil war, which burma is in
 
they are, if thr seeking refuge from civil war, which burma is in
You guys make me laugh. Rohingya is another example where Muslim's are not able to live peacefully with another community. In this case it is with Buddhists in Myanmar. India has all the right to protect its country to stop itself from becoming another Burma.

I ask the question again - Bangladesh is closer from Myanmar than India. Why these guys taking refuge in Delhi, in the land of Kaffirs? They can take refuge in Yunus's Bangladesh na? It will be full Bhai chaara.

India has lots of internal issues. Illegal Bangladeshis will land in sea, give or take. You are free to complain in UN though.

:kp
 
You guys make me laugh. Rohingya is another example where Muslim's are not able to live peacefully with another community. In this case it is with Buddhists in Myanmar. India has all the right to protect its country to stop itself from becoming another Burma.

I ask the question again - Bangladesh is closer from Myanmar than India. Why these guys taking refuge in Delhi, in the land of Kaffirs? They can take refuge in Yunus's Bangladesh na? It will be full Bhai chaara.

India has lots of internal issues. Illegal Bangladeshis will land in sea, give or take. You are free to complain in UN though.

:kp
you didnt answer my question or even yours, you stated thr illegal, ive told you thr not illegal due to UN laws over civil war countries - refugees are allowed status.....


Please repsond to the question i posted and what you stated earlier on, stop changing topics, stay on track
 
you didnt answer my question or even yours, you stated thr illegal, ive told you thr not illegal due to UN laws over civil war countries - refugees are allowed status.....


Please repsond to the question i posted and what you stated earlier on, stop changing topics, stay on track
The law according to you - right to safe passage to the nearest safe country

Bangladesh is nearer to Myanmar than India. So the question is still valid - why they seeking refuge in India and not their homeland in Bangladesh?
 

'Dangerous Precedent': Former Judges, Senior Lawyers Write to CJI Over His Remarks on Rohingyas​



The signatories argued that invoking domestic poverty to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent” and reasserted that the Rohingyas, like any person in India, are protected under Article 21.

New Delhi: A group of former judges, senior advocates and members of the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) on Friday (December 5) has written an open letter to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant expressing “deep concern” over remarks made by a Supreme Court bench which was headed by the CJI himself on December 2 while hearing a plea on the alleged custodial disappearance of Rohingya refugees. The signatories underlined that the CJI’s words “carry weight not simply in the courtroom but in the conscience of the nation” and the move to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent”.

The letter states that the comments made during the hearing particularly those “questioning the legal status of the Rohingya as refugees,” equating them with “intruders illegally entering India,” likening them to people “who dig tunnels,” and asking “whether such entrants are entitled to food, shelter and education” are “contrary to core constitutional values.” Further, the signatories mentioned that the remarks have “had the effect of dehumanising Rohingya refugees whose equal humanity and equal human rights are protected by the constitution, our laws and by international law.”

The habeas corpus petition in question was filed by Rita Manchanda seeking information on the location of five Rohingya illegal immigrants who could not be traced after being detained – a request opposed by solicitor general Tushar Mehta.

“Where is the order of the Government of India declaring them [Rohingyas] as refugees? Refugee is a well defined legal term and there is a prescribed authority by the Government to declare them. If there is no legal status of a refugee, and somebody is an intruder, and he enters illegally, do we have an obligation to keep that fellow here?” Justice Surya Kant was quoted as saying by Live Law during the hearing.

Further, the CJI said, “Once these illegal migrants are in India, they claim right to food and shelter and help for their children. We have many poor people in the country. They have a right over the country’s resources, not the illegal migrants. True, the illegal migrants cannot be subjected to custodial torture.”

The signatories include former judges Justice A.P. Shah, Justice K. Chandru and Justice Anjana Prakash; senior legal figures such as Mohan Gopal, Rajeev Dhavan, Chander Uday Singh, Colin Gonsalves, Kamini Jaiswal, Mihir Desai, Gopal Shankar Narayan, Gautam Bhatia, Shahrukh Alam; and CJAR members and activists such as Prashant Bhushan, Nikhil Dey, Anjali Bhardwaj, Amrita Johri, Apar Gupta, Vipul Mudgal, Beena Pallical, Annie Raja, Meera Sanghamitra, among others.

The signatories argued that invoking domestic poverty to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent” and reasserted that the Rohingyas, like any person in India, are protected under Article 21. Citing NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh (1996), they reminded the court that “the state is bound to protect the life and liberty of every human being, be he a citizen or otherwise.”

“Further, invoking the plight of the poor in India to justify denying protections to refugees sets a dangerous precedent, being contrary to the principles of constitutional justice. The Rohingya, as indeed any person residing in India, is entitled to the protections of Article 21 and not just protections from “third degree measures”. This fundamental right is available to an individual who is a citizen or any other person residing in India,” the signatories wrote.

They noted that the Rohingyas have been described by the United Nations as “the most persecuted minority in the world” and are fleeing “ethnic cleansing and genocide.” Comparing them to intruders, they argued, “weakens the moral authority of the judiciary.”

“They are an ethnic minority in Buddhist majority Myanmar who have endured decades of violence and discrimination. Denied citizenship, the Rohingya are stateless. They have fled to neighbouring countries in waves over the past many years, escaping what has been described by the International Court of Justice as ethnic cleansing and genocide at the hands of the armed forces. They are fleeing to India, like centuries of refugees before them, seeking basic safety,” the letter mentioned.

Further, the letter stressed that refugee status determination is declaratory and that India’s own Standard Operating Procedure for Foreign Nationals Claiming to be Refugees aligns with international law. Refoulement without due process, the signatories argued, violates Article 21.

“Any refoulment, imprisonment or detention without having individually and formally determined their claim as a refugee, is therefore illegal. It is gutting the right to non-refoulment which the Courts have held to be a part of Article 21,” the letter mentioned.

The signatories recalled India’s long history of hosting Tibetan, Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi refugees and noted that the country has always treated refugees as occupying a “qualitatively different status” from migrants.

Appeal to the CJI​

Addressing Chief Justice Surya Kant, the signatories wrote: “Your words carry weight not simply in the courtroom but in the conscience of the nation and have a cascading effect on the high courts, the lower judiciary and other government authorities.”

They warned that rhetoric hostile to the dignity of persecuted groups “threatens the foundational values of our constitution” and risks eroding public trust in the judiciary’s ability to protect the vulnerable.

They urged the CJI to reaffirm “in public statements, remarks in court and judicial verdicts” the judiciary’s commitment to constitutional morality, human dignity and justice “regardless of origin.”

“The majesty of the Supreme Court and your office is measured not merely by the number of verdicts or administrative measures but more by the humanity with which those verdicts are delivered and considered,” the letter stated.
 
they have a right to safe passage to the nearest safe country = UN laws
India isn’t a signatory to un convention on refugees so Unless un is arranging logistics to get these people out, India will have to take steps to get them out of India by any which way possible,


If pakistanis are so worried why don’t they arrange the logistics to take these people to Pakistan.
 

'Dangerous Precedent': Former Judges, Senior Lawyers Write to CJI Over His Remarks on Rohingyas​



The signatories argued that invoking domestic poverty to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent” and reasserted that the Rohingyas, like any person in India, are protected under Article 21.

New Delhi: A group of former judges, senior advocates and members of the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) on Friday (December 5) has written an open letter to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant expressing “deep concern” over remarks made by a Supreme Court bench which was headed by the CJI himself on December 2 while hearing a plea on the alleged custodial disappearance of Rohingya refugees. The signatories underlined that the CJI’s words “carry weight not simply in the courtroom but in the conscience of the nation” and the move to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent”.

The letter states that the comments made during the hearing particularly those “questioning the legal status of the Rohingya as refugees,” equating them with “intruders illegally entering India,” likening them to people “who dig tunnels,” and asking “whether such entrants are entitled to food, shelter and education” are “contrary to core constitutional values.” Further, the signatories mentioned that the remarks have “had the effect of dehumanising Rohingya refugees whose equal humanity and equal human rights are protected by the constitution, our laws and by international law.”

The habeas corpus petition in question was filed by Rita Manchanda seeking information on the location of five Rohingya illegal immigrants who could not be traced after being detained – a request opposed by solicitor general Tushar Mehta.

“Where is the order of the Government of India declaring them [Rohingyas] as refugees? Refugee is a well defined legal term and there is a prescribed authority by the Government to declare them. If there is no legal status of a refugee, and somebody is an intruder, and he enters illegally, do we have an obligation to keep that fellow here?” Justice Surya Kant was quoted as saying by Live Law during the hearing.

Further, the CJI said, “Once these illegal migrants are in India, they claim right to food and shelter and help for their children. We have many poor people in the country. They have a right over the country’s resources, not the illegal migrants. True, the illegal migrants cannot be subjected to custodial torture.”

The signatories include former judges Justice A.P. Shah, Justice K. Chandru and Justice Anjana Prakash; senior legal figures such as Mohan Gopal, Rajeev Dhavan, Chander Uday Singh, Colin Gonsalves, Kamini Jaiswal, Mihir Desai, Gopal Shankar Narayan, Gautam Bhatia, Shahrukh Alam; and CJAR members and activists such as Prashant Bhushan, Nikhil Dey, Anjali Bhardwaj, Amrita Johri, Apar Gupta, Vipul Mudgal, Beena Pallical, Annie Raja, Meera Sanghamitra, among others.

The signatories argued that invoking domestic poverty to deny constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees “sets a dangerous precedent” and reasserted that the Rohingyas, like any person in India, are protected under Article 21. Citing NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh (1996), they reminded the court that “the state is bound to protect the life and liberty of every human being, be he a citizen or otherwise.”

“Further, invoking the plight of the poor in India to justify denying protections to refugees sets a dangerous precedent, being contrary to the principles of constitutional justice. The Rohingya, as indeed any person residing in India, is entitled to the protections of Article 21 and not just protections from “third degree measures”. This fundamental right is available to an individual who is a citizen or any other person residing in India,” the signatories wrote.

They noted that the Rohingyas have been described by the United Nations as “the most persecuted minority in the world” and are fleeing “ethnic cleansing and genocide.” Comparing them to intruders, they argued, “weakens the moral authority of the judiciary.”

“They are an ethnic minority in Buddhist majority Myanmar who have endured decades of violence and discrimination. Denied citizenship, the Rohingya are stateless. They have fled to neighbouring countries in waves over the past many years, escaping what has been described by the International Court of Justice as ethnic cleansing and genocide at the hands of the armed forces. They are fleeing to India, like centuries of refugees before them, seeking basic safety,” the letter mentioned.

Further, the letter stressed that refugee status determination is declaratory and that India’s own Standard Operating Procedure for Foreign Nationals Claiming to be Refugees aligns with international law. Refoulement without due process, the signatories argued, violates Article 21.

“Any refoulment, imprisonment or detention without having individually and formally determined their claim as a refugee, is therefore illegal. It is gutting the right to non-refoulment which the Courts have held to be a part of Article 21,” the letter mentioned.

The signatories recalled India’s long history of hosting Tibetan, Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi refugees and noted that the country has always treated refugees as occupying a “qualitatively different status” from migrants.

Appeal to the CJI​

Addressing Chief Justice Surya Kant, the signatories wrote: “Your words carry weight not simply in the courtroom but in the conscience of the nation and have a cascading effect on the high courts, the lower judiciary and other government authorities.”

They warned that rhetoric hostile to the dignity of persecuted groups “threatens the foundational values of our constitution” and risks eroding public trust in the judiciary’s ability to protect the vulnerable.

They urged the CJI to reaffirm “in public statements, remarks in court and judicial verdicts” the judiciary’s commitment to constitutional morality, human dignity and justice “regardless of origin.”

“The majesty of the Supreme Court and your office is measured not merely by the number of verdicts or administrative measures but more by the humanity with which those verdicts are delivered and considered,” the letter stated.
Ngo judges now trying to put pressure on Cji


This will not work any more

The citizens are fed up of these NGOs

Illegal. Immigrants will no be allowed to live in India and NGOs won’t be able to stop their deportation.
 
The law according to you - right to safe passage to the nearest safe country

Bangladesh is nearer to Myanmar than India. So the question is still valid - why they seeking refuge in India and not their homeland in Bangladesh?
Myanmar shares a border with China why don’t they go there.

Why should Indians pay the price of a myanmarese ethnic problem
 
Ngo judges now trying to put pressure on Cji


This will not work any more

The citizens are fed up of these NGOs

Illegal. Immigrants will no be allowed to live in India and NGOs won’t be able to stop their deportation.
What these guys like @finalfantasy7 fail to understand is these dramebaazis no longer works in India. It been the case since 2014. One would presume by now they would have gotten used to it. However, they are still crying and whining after 11 years.

Rohingya is not India's problem and India is under no obligation to take any refugees.
 
What these guys like @finalfantasy7 fail to understand is these dramebaazis no longer works in India. It been the case since 2014. One would presume by now they would have gotten used to it. However, they are still crying and whining after 11 years.

Rohingya is not India's problem and India is under no obligation to take any refugees.

Pakistanis can whine as much as they want want, rohingyaa are going to to be thrown out UN cannot stop it
 
What these guys like @finalfantasy7 fail to understand is these dramebaazis no longer works in India. It been the case since 2014. One would presume by now they would have gotten used to it. However, they are still crying and whining after 11 years.

Rohingya is not India's problem and India is under no obligation to take any refugees.
India has the obligation to take them in, as they have arrived into India, - can you not read the UN - refugees
 
India has the obligation to take them in, as they have arrived into India, - can you not read the UN - refugees
No. India is not legally obligated to take refugees because it hasn't signed the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, so it lacks a national refugee law. Continue your spamming...dont argue with me who will challenge and expose you.

Also, you are yet to respond why they are not seeking refuge in Bangladesh or China which are closer to Myanmar compared to India? I thought UN says you should take refuge in nearest safe country?
 
not that many people champ, more indians have illegally imigrated out from india in last 6hrs than the bengalis entered......


wheres your outrage????




@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980


#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndiaIndians
 
not that many people champ, more indians have illegally imigrated out from india in last 6hrs than the bengalis entered......


wheres your outrage????




@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980


#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndiaIndians
All illegals must be kicked out. It does not matter whether it is in India or the west.

The issue I am pointing out is the illegal Bangladeshis encroaching into India. They all need to be booted out of India asap. Many of them could be Islamic radicals. :mv
 
not that many people champ, more indians have illegally imigrated out from india in last 6hrs than the bengalis entered......


wheres your outrage????




@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980


#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndiaIndians

Indians are one of the largest illegal groups in the world. :inti

A large percentage of the illegals in North America are Indians. As a matter of fact, India is #3 in USA in terms of illegal immigration.




 
All illegals must be kicked out. It does not matter whether it is in India or the west.

The issue I am pointing out is the illegal Bangladeshis encroaching into India. They all need to be booted out of India asap. Many of them could be Islamic radicals. :mv

Hindutva Flags in Leicester Raise Alarm​





Reports have emerged of Bajrang Dal and other Hindutva-associated flags being displayed at a recent celebration in Leicester, sparking concern within local communities.

Given the findings of the new report into the 2022 unrest, authored by the UK Indian Muslim Council (UKIMC) and the Community Policy Forum – which highlighted intimidation fuelled by Hindutva extremism, the Muslim Council of Britain is calling for urgent action.

A spokesperson for the MCB said:




2nd report = https://forsea.co/the-british-state-is-right-hindutva-is-an-ideology-of-concern-in-the-uk/


3rd report = https://muslimmirror.com/uk-expands-counter-extremism-focus-to-include-hindutva/

 
Back
Top