Imran Khan submits money trail to Supreme Court

[Bewal Express]

From the link you provided

View attachment 75623


"Tax on only your Canadian sourced income"

Always handy to be actually smart, than to act smart. Important life lesson for you.

Poor Black Zero is shown up again.

 

[Black Zero]

From the link you provided

View attachment 75623


"Tax on only your Canadian sourced income"

Always handy to be actually smart, than to act smart. Important life lesson for you.

IK was pakistani resident when he did not pay tax.

Note: I have nothing against you, you might be nice guy, but I am tired of spoon feeding. So pardon me, if I do not respond to your queries. Again it's not about you.

 

[Black Zero]

Let me troll.

From dawn:
Naeem Bokhari, representing Imran, told the court that to his client's knowledge, foreign income was non-taxable in Pakistan, which is why taxes were not paid on his flat.

We cannot get clearer admission.

 

[yasir]

I may have disagreement with IK on political front, but if couple of flats in UK is all they have on him, that is just nothing...He was the most famous Pakistani Cricketer of All time, for him making even couple of million pounds is not smoking gun, we are not talking about 10s of million pounds here. This is distraction, and should not be equate to corruption done by Generals and NS, that's a whole different level. It will be very unfortunate if people and court think of IK and NS/Generals corruption at same level...

"Chori aik key ho Ya Lakh key, chori chori hai" is a BS philosophy, scale and intent matters a whole lot :

 

[WebGuru]

I may have disagreement with IK on political front, but if couple of flats in UK is all they have on him, that is just nothing...He was the most famous Pakistani Cricketer of All time, for him making even couple of million pounds is not smoking gun, we are not talking about 10s of million pounds here. This is distraction, and should not be equate to corruption done by Generals and NS, that's a whole different level. It will be very unfortunate if people and court think of IK and NS/Generals corruption at same level...

"Chori aik key ho Ya Lakh key, chori chori hai" is a BS philosophy, scale and intent matters a whole lot :

Not couple of flats actually just ONE damn flat worth 117,500 pounds in 1983/84 and he sold and transferred that money to Pak that's his biggest sin instead of sending money from Pak to overseas. He already provided a money trail of more thn 300k that includes his earnings from county, kerry packer etc. Now PMLN clowns are saying why he said 117,000 earlier when actual cost was 117,500 and why he said he paid for it when it was on mortgage

 

[yasir]

Not couple of flats actually just ONE damn flat worth 117,500 pounds in 1983/84 and he sold and transferred that money to Pak that's his biggest sin instead of sending money from Pak to overseas. He already provided a money trail of more thn 300k that includes his earnings from county, kerry packer etc. Now PMLN clowns are saying why he said 117,000 earlier when actual cost was 117,500 and why he said he paid for it when it was on mortgage

120K is nothing for Superstar Cricketer...He was the first superstar Cricketer from Asia, this is unfortunate, public cannot differentiate between the two

 

[WebGuru]

120K is nothing for Superstar Cricketer...He was the first superstar Cricketer from Asia, this is unfortunate, public cannot differentiate between the two

Some media channels running on Sharifs money are making sure it looks like both cases are same and unfortunately the propaganda looks successful at some level.

 

[Black Zero]

120K is nothing for Superstar Cricketer...He was the first superstar Cricketer from Asia, this is unfortunate, public cannot differentiate between the two

Petitioner Hanif Abbasi did not demand, SC asked the trail for it's own satisfaction.
Now, owning the flat is not an issue, but not declaring/paying tax on it, is the latest discussion point.
Interestingly there is a middle man when Jemima gold smith sent money to IK (it was not a direct transfer to IK)

Anyway, IK is safe for 2/3 years.

Jehangir Tareen is also under scope now.

 

[waqar goraya]

Now, the main question to IK is that he did not declare his London flat to Election Commission in the elections of 97.

 

[IMMY69]

Now, the main question to IK is that he did not declare his London flat to Election Commission in the elections of 97.

If he owned the property, was not renting it out then I don't see what the problem is. He is not earning an income from the foreign property whilst he was living in Pakistan.

Any income that was made from the property would be taxable in the U.K. As that is where the income was generated. Double taxation laws apply in this case.

As long as Imran Khan complied with UK tax laws then I fail to see how the Pakistan Tax Services can get involved.

The only question that needed answering is how did Imran Khan get the money to buy the property in the first place. This has already been answered and money trail has been disclosed.

Question is how did the Shariffs accumulate their billions?

 

[waqar goraya]

The question to Imran is not of corruption or having assets beyond means anymore.

The courts and election commission in the past have disqualified members of parliament because they failed to mention a certain bank account in their nomination papers.

The problem is that Imran Khan did not mention his London flat on the nomination papers of 2002 elections. Since 2002, it is necessary for candidates to submit complete details of their assets/accounts , where ever in this world ( that means foreign currency or foreign based).

Now, the question to IK's lawyer is why IK should not be disqualified as member of parliament, as he is no more Saadiq and Amin ( under Article 62,63) because of his failure to declare his asset on the nomination papers of 2002?

 

[waqar goraya]

[MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION] [MENTION=135]Waseem[/MENTION] [MENTION=138254]Syed1[/MENTION] [MENTION=140234]DRsohail[/MENTION]

A MNA was disqualified because he failed to mention one account in his nomination papers. So, can IK be disqualified for non declaration of London falt in the nomination papers of 2002 elections?
What could be the defence here?

 

[DRsohail]

if its after 2002 then no worries,he did disclose it in 2013...

 

[Waseem]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Imran Khan disqualification case hearing scheduled in the final cause list of Supreme Court for Monday 31 July 2017. <a href="https://t.co/IVxF1UwjAb">https://t.co/IVxF1UwjAb</a> <a href="https://t.co/bPCKUOJYew">pic.twitter.com/bPCKUOJYew</a></p>— Ibrahim Qazi (@miqazi) <a href="https://twitter.com/miqazi/status/891305259225812993">July 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Let's see how this goes, would be absolutely ridiculous if Imran Khan gets disqualified and not saying this as a PTI supporter but i just don't see any logic and comparison as this case was filed as a reaction to Panama case against Sharifs and even though complete money trail was provided by Imran Khan, PMLN argument in the end was:

Imran Khan said flat was purchased when in reality it was mortgaged
Imran Khan said flat was purchased for 117000 pounds but it was 117500 pounds

lol...yes this was their argument in the end.

If somehow Imran is disqualified as a balancing act then surely Sharif mafia will be stronger than ever as they will create perception that Imran Khan is corrupt and how he purchased flats using zakaat funds which is ridiculous since he started collecting zakaat long after flat was purchased.

 

[Black Zero]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Imran Khan disqualification case hearing scheduled in the final cause list of Supreme Court for Monday 31 July 2017. <a href="https://t.co/IVxF1UwjAb">https://t.co/IVxF1UwjAb</a> <a href="https://t.co/bPCKUOJYew">pic.twitter.com/bPCKUOJYew</a></p>— Ibrahim Qazi (@miqazi) <a href="https://twitter.com/miqazi/status/891305259225812993">July 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Let's see how this goes, would be absolutely ridiculous if Imran Khan gets disqualified and not saying this as a PTI supporter but i just don't see any logic and comparison as this case was filed as a reaction to Panama case against Sharifs and even though complete money trail was provided by Imran Khan, PMLN argument in the end was:

Imran Khan said flat was purchased when in reality it was mortgaged
Imran Khan said flat was purchased for 117000 pounds but it was 117500 pounds

lol...yes this was their argument in the end.

If somehow Imran is disqualified as a balancing act then surely Sharif mafia will be stronger than ever as they will create perception that Imran Khan is corrupt and how he purchased flats using zakaat funds which is ridiculous since he started collecting zakaat long after flat was purchased.

it would be just fair (but i do not think IK would be disqualified) as NS was disqualified by 3 judges on non-non-disclosure.

Anyway, Jehangir Tareen is a goner.

in the end, it's a personality politics, so NS and IK and Bhuttos would still rule the Pakistanis.

 

[WebGuru]

Anyway, Jehangir Tareen is a goner.

Tareen is the one doing these negotiations with all these electables jumping the PPP and PMLN ships so it's going to hurt PTI really bad. Shah Mehmood and IK both are far away from constituency politics. Ch Sarwar can be an asset but he is beign underutilized.

 

[coooolali]

Tareen is the one doing these negotiations with all these electables jumping the PPP and PMLN ships so it's going to hurt PTI really bad. Shah Mehmood and IK both are far away from constituency politics. Ch Sarwar can be an asset but he is beign underutilized.

Tareen is Goner if Hanif Abbasi will bring loan exemption point in court but I highly doubt he will.A lot of high profile people from both Pml N and PPP involved in this scandal with Tareen.

 

[coooolali]

Today was the hearing of Foreign funding case and this is getting confusing to the core. Pml N leaders are claming its proved fake documents were submitted before court.This claim has been acknowledged by their lawyer Akram Sheikh as well.On the other hand Pti leaders have a different story to tell. They say Akram sheikh has to request for forgiveness two times from judges during today's proceedings and they could not prove anything and their case is based on false allegations. Who to believe ? [MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION]

 

[WebGuru]

Today was the hearing of Foreign funding case and this is getting confusing to the core. Pml N leaders are claming its proved fake documents were submitted before court.This claim has been acknowledged by their lawyer Akram Sheikh as well.On the other hand Pti leaders have a different story to tell. They say Akram sheikh has to request for forgiveness two times from judges during today's proceedings and they could not prove anything and their case is based on false allegations. Who to believe ? [MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION]

Going by recent Panama case i will belive PTI because PMLN leader had a different story to tell in media after every bashing in regular hearings and in the end it was proved they were being exposed daily and hiding it through attack Imran when coming out of SC.

 

[coooolali]

Going by recent Panama case i will belive PTI because PMLN leader had a different story to tell in media after every bashing in regular hearings and in the end it was proved they were being exposed daily and hiding it through attack Imran when coming out of SC.

I was hoping this case will be quashed soon but going by judge remarks the defence of Pti lawyers seems to be very weak and judge now want detailed investigation. Dont think this case is going anywhere anytime soon.

 

[Mian]

I was hoping this case will be quashed soon but going by judge remarks the defence of Pti lawyers seems to be very weak and judge now want detailed investigation. Dont think this case is going anywhere anytime soon.

SC should investigate all parties funding not just PTI

 

[Leo23]

rules are rules. article 62,63 has raised the bar so high that no one will come clean now.

 

[coooolali]

SC should investigate all parties funding not just PTI

I agree and onus is on EC to do so but I highly doubt they will do so.

 

[srh]

The question to Imran is not of corruption or having assets beyond means anymore.

The courts and election commission in the past have disqualified members of parliament because they failed to mention a certain bank account in their nomination papers.

The problem is that Imran Khan did not mention his London flat on the nomination papers of 2002 elections. Since 2002, it is necessary for candidates to submit complete details of their assets/accounts , where ever in this world ( that means foreign currency or foreign based).

Now, the question to IK's lawyer is why IK should not be disqualified as member of parliament, as he is no more Saadiq and Amin ( under Article 62,63) because of his failure to declare his asset on the nomination papers of 2002?

the way you put it I believe IK can be disqualified based on 2002 elections submission. He should have been honest about his assets at that time.

 

[WebGuru]

Yeh Akram Sheikh Imran ka Wakeel he ya Sharifs ka )
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نےزندگی میں بہت محنت کی،طلسماتی شخصیت کےمالک ہیں،اکرم شیخ</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/892296752300163080">August 1, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان آکسفورڈ سے پڑھے ہوئے ہیں،اکرم شیخ</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/892296790858510336">August 1, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان کےلیےبرطانوی عدالتوں کےفیصلےسمجھنامشکل نہیں،اکرم شیخ</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/892296833518665728">August 1, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">شوکت خانم کو باقاعدگی سے امداد دیتا ہوں،اکرم شیخ</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/892297429348999168">August 1, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">ہرسال 20،25 کھالیں شوکت خانم کو دیتا ہوں، اکرم شیخ</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/892297471879254018">August 1, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[coooolali]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">SC CJ ruled that <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI">@ImranKhanPTI</a> cannot be declared disqualified on the plead of foreign funding petition filed by Sharif's crony Hanif Abbasi</p>— Owais Tohid (@OwaisTohid) <a href="https://twitter.com/OwaisTohid/status/892296401492865024">August 1, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Asim_khan]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">SC CJ ruled that <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI">@ImranKhanPTI</a> cannot be declared disqualified on the plead of foreign funding petition filed by Sharif's crony Hanif Abbasi</p>— Owais Tohid (@OwaisTohid) <a href="https://twitter.com/OwaisTohid/status/892296401492865024">August 1, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Geo and the Nooras are gonna be upset over this, do you think connecting their collective blood pressure to the National grid would fix our energy shortage? It's worth a go.

Anyway what do you think their next line of attack will be?

 

[coooolali]

Geo and the Nooras are gonna be upset over this, do you think connecting their collective blood pressure to the National grid would fix our energy shortage? It's worth a go.

Anyway what do you think their next line of attack will be?

Since yesterday their line of attack is hell bent on saying fake documents are submitted in court and Judges are not buying it. Judges are saying to them again and again if they are fake prove it. Iss baat ka unn kay pass koi jawab nahi.Yesterday Even Justice Omer Bandiyal said documents submitted by Pti are complete and they have not concealed anything. Today Justice Faisal said its a good thing Pti is getting funding from abroad and Hanif Abbassi's had no answer for that. Since nothing is working for Pml N from yesrday they have started attacking IK's personal life. Even one of the judges said Aap media say baat kar rahay hain ya hum say ?
They have no line of attack other than attacking SKMCH and attacking IK's personal life.

 

[Asim_khan]

Since yesterday their line of attack is hell bent on saying fake documents are submitted in court and Judges are not buying it. Judges are saying to them again and again if they are fake prove it. Iss baat ka unn kay pass koi jawab nahi.Yesterday Even Justice Omer Bandiyal said documents submitted by Pti are complete and they have not concealed anything. Today Justice Faisal said its a good thing Pti is getting funding from abroad and Hanif Abbassi's had no answer for that. Since nothing is working for Pml N from yesrday they have started attacking IK's personal life. Even one of the judges said Aap media say baat kar rahay hain ya hum say ?
They have no line of attack other than attacking SKMCH and attacking IK's personal life.

They're muddying the waters, PMLN & certain media establishments, throwing dung hoping some of it will stick. Over the past couple of days they really have gone into overdrive, Not so much a pack of hungry hyenas going for a rotting carcass, but desperate hungry wolves trying to 'Hail Mary' a kill.

Really impressed with our judiciary though, they've got one hell finely tuned of a BS detector

 

[coooolali]

They're muddying the waters, PMLN & certain media establishments, throwing dung hoping some of it will stick. Over the past couple of days they really have gone into overdrive, Not so much a pack of hungry hyenas going for a rotting carcass, but desperate hungry wolves trying to 'Hail Mary' a kill.

Really impressed with our judiciary though, they've got one hell finely tuned of a BS detector

Danyal Aziz and Haneef Abbassi when they come out of court literally make me laugh now. The amount of bs they come up with these days is lolworthy.

 

[saeedhk]

A great news!I was fearing IK disqualification as a means of balancing the scale.

 

[WebGuru]

A great news!I was fearing IK disqualification as a means of balancing the scale.

Hold your horses this is just one of those cases there are at least 6 currently on IK in SC and ECP thanks for standing upto Mafia

 

[Asim_khan]

Hold your horses this is just one of those cases there are at least 6 currently on IK in SC and ECP thanks for standing upto Mafia

6 Cases? What's left to fight? Off the top of my head there's the £117,500 house, there's the fact he allegedly didn't declare he had it in 1997/2002??

 

[Mian]

6 Cases? What's left to fight? Off the top of my head there's the £117,500 house, there's the fact he allegedly didn't declare he had it in 1997/2002??

Attack on PTV, Attack on ECP. Overseas funding of PTI, Bani Gala trail, Source of London flat etc are different cases.

 

[Asim_khan]

Attack on PTV, Attack on ECP. Overseas funding of PTI, Bani Gala trail, Source of London flat etc are different cases.

Was this not the overseas funding case?

And there I was thinking the Bani Gala/London flat case were the same one. With all these cases going on, soon he's gonna have to prove where he's getting the funding for all these lawyers

 

[Gayle_Force]

Was this not the overseas funding case?

And there I was thinking the Bani Gala/London flat case were the same one. With all these cases going on, soon he's gonna have to prove where he's getting the funding for all these lawyers

They are the same case. I think there a total of three cases Imran Khan is facing. overseas funding, bani gala money trail, and non declaration of assets(offshore company) in 2002 election.

 

[Mian]

Was this not the overseas funding case?

And there I was thinking the Bani Gala/London flat case were the same one. With all these cases going on, soon he's gonna have to prove where he's getting the funding for all these lawyers

Same case but another petition to share money trail of london flat after he provided complete money trail of bani gala.

 

[Mian]

They are the same case. I think there a total of three cases Imran Khan is facing. overseas funding, bani gala money trail, and non declaration of assets(offshore company) in 2002 election.

There are also 2 cases on him for attacking ecp and ptv. Qadri is also in ptv case

 

[ShadabFakhar]

The cases against Imran are a good advert of why he's the right man for Pakistan. If this is all they could find on him, they're either incredibly poor investigators or he's the cleanest politician in Pakistan. Anyone with half a brain cell knows Imran Khan is not corrupt.

 

[Abdullah719]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just for the record: Mr Khan avoided UK-taxes via an offshore-company <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NiaziServicesLimited?src=hash">#NiaziServicesLimited</a> <a href="https://t.co/XgGUCFmR2Q">https://t.co/XgGUCFmR2Q</a></p>— Frederik Obermaier (@f_obermaier) <a href="https://twitter.com/f_obermaier/status/891952420510732288">July 31, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Gayle_Force]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just for the record: Mr Khan avoided UK-taxes via an offshore-company <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NiaziServicesLimited?src=hash">#NiaziServicesLimited</a> <a href="https://t.co/XgGUCFmR2Q">https://t.co/XgGUCFmR2Q</a></p>— Frederik Obermaier (@f_obermaier) <a href="https://twitter.com/f_obermaier/status/891952420510732288">July 31, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Tax avoidance is not illegal

 

[Abdullah719]

Tax avoidance is not illegal

I know.

 

[Gayle_Force]

I know.

Just making sure

That tweet can be misinterpreted

 

[Abdullah719]

Just making sure

That tweet can be misinterpreted

I can see some segments of Pakistani media have already done that.

 

[Asim_khan]

Just making sure

That tweet can be misinterpreted

At his next jalsa he should bring it up and say it was British tax he avoided, and so none of it could be used to bomb innocent Muslims abroad.

...But he's got a bit more class than me, so he probably won't.

 

[WebGuru]

 

[Black Zero]

He is the main character of this season, zero chance for disqualification.

 

[Waseem]

He is the main character of this season, zero chance for disqualification.

Lol perfect example of sour grapes, you are even trying to disqualify him based on his statement whether flat was mortgaged or bought out right and whether price was 117000 or 1175500. Now Talal Ch even wants him to be disqualified due to harassment accusations made by Ayesha Gulalai lol

In the end, choro bik gayi hai gormint koi chance nahi

 

[coooolali]

Lookslike Foreign funding case is done and dusted. From Danyal Aziz's presser it was evident case will be quashed soon. In other news another Reference is filed against IK in EC over Ayesha Gulalai's allegations.

 

[WebGuru]

Lookslike Foreign funding case is done and dusted. From Danyal Aziz's presser it was evident case will be quashed soon. In other news another Reference is filed against IK in EC over Ayesha Gulalai's allegations.

When they came out they were more interested Gulalai's allegations thn the case lol so it looks like that case is done and dusted. Akram Sheikh remarks look like he is begging SC to please please disqualify IK to balance it

 

[Black Zero]

Lol perfect example of sour grapes, you are even trying to disqualify him based on his statement whether flat was mortgaged or bought out right and whether price was 117000 or 1175500. Now Talal Ch even wants him to be disqualified due to harassment accusations made by Ayesha Gulalai lol

In the end, choro bik gayi hai gormint koi chance nahi

Analogy of sour grapes does not apply as I still want him to be disqualified.

 

[Black Zero]

When they came out they were more interested Gulalai's allegations thn the case lol so it looks like that case is done and dusted. Akram Sheikh remarks look like he is begging SC to please please disqualify IK to balance it

Judges ask tough questions to both parties.
Yesterday was petitioner's turn. Earlier, it was defense's.

 

[WebGuru]

Judges ask tough questions to both parties.
Yesterday was petitioner's turn. Earlier, it was defense's.

True but this is hilarious look at the desperation
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">کیا عمران خان پر کوئی قانون لاگو ہوتا ہے یا سب معاف ہے، اکرم شیخ<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Abbtakk?src=hash">#Abbtakk</a></p>— AbbTakk (@AbbTakk) <a href="https://twitter.com/AbbTakk/status/892688646553337857">August 2, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عدالت جتنا چاہے عمران خان کو فائدہ دے، اکرم شیخ<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Abbtakk?src=hash">#Abbtakk</a></p>— AbbTakk (@AbbTakk) <a href="https://twitter.com/AbbTakk/status/892688709002424322">August 2, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">مجھے علم نہیں عمران خان کو کتنے قتل معاف ہیں، اکرم شیخ<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Abbtakk?src=hash">#Abbtakk</a></p>— AbbTakk (@AbbTakk) <a href="https://twitter.com/AbbTakk/status/892688661577428993">August 2, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">کیا عمران خان کو جہاز کا کرایہ اور پاسپورٹ کا ٹھپہ معاف ہے، اکرم شیخ<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Abbtakk?src=hash">#Abbtakk</a></p>— AbbTakk (@AbbTakk) <a href="https://twitter.com/AbbTakk/status/892688638345191424">August 2, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[coooolali]

When they came out they were more interested Gulalai's allegations thn the case lol so it looks like that case is done and dusted. Akram Sheikh remarks look like he is begging SC to please please disqualify IK to balance it

Desperation brother. According to Naeem ul haq Akram sheikh started to tell his family and Judges had to say cade par baat karain. Typical dragging tactics by Nooras.
Danyal Aziz par toh Contempt of Court ka case banta hai the way he was degrading court today and calling the judges biased towards PTI.

 

[coooolali]

Haneef Abbasi filed another petition against IK in SC. Kitna vaila hai yeh banda...

 

[WebGuru]

Haneef Abbasi filed another petition against IK in SC. Kitna vaila hai yeh banda...

Aik case khatam hojaaye baaqi petitions CJ ne utha ker iske mu per maarni hen ke iska to koi or kaam he nae.

 

[saeedhk]

I do not have any evidence of Imran Khan's money laundering - Sheikh Akram
[MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION]

 

[WebGuru]

I do not have any evidence of Imran Khan's money laundering - Sheikh Akram

[MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION]

Now we know why this new drama of Gulalai started...

 

[coooolali]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">منی لانڈرنگ کا میرے پاس کوئی ثبوت نہیں نہ الزام لگایا، اکرم شیخ</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/893029443261927425">August 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Judges must be feeling like banging their heads in wall after hearing this. )

 

[WebGuru]

MLN MPA Sardar Aurangzeb commenting about SC judges. "Judge Saahibano Imran Khan tumhara baap lagta he usko be na ehel kero"

<blockquote class="twitter-video" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="rtl">PMLN MPA from PK 47 Sardar Aurangzeb commenting about SC judges. <br>"جج صاحبانوں! عمران خان تمھارا باپ لگتا ہے٬ اسے بھی نا اہل کرو۔" <a href="https://t.co/ldroCLvKY9">pic.twitter.com/ldroCLvKY9</a></p>— Rehman Azhar (@rehman_azhar) <a href="https://twitter.com/rehman_azhar/status/893422176262639616">August 4, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[ShadabFakhar]

PML- N is a real gunda party. I've seen a few decent MPs in PPP with the likes of Khar, Eithzhaz Hasan, and a few others but there's hardly anyone worth listening to in PML-N

 

[WebGuru]

PML- N is a real gunda party. I've seen a few decent MPs in PPP with the likes of Khar, Eithzhaz Hasan, and a few others but there's hardly anyone worth listening to in PML-N

From PPP Kaira and Chan are also sensible. PPP got some respected name but their co chairman Zardari is an evil genius you can expect him to go down at any level without getting caught.

 

[Black Zero]

 

[WebGuru]

Chitrol of Noon lawyer in SC today by CJ and other judges...
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">بظاہر کوئی بدنیتی اور دھوکا دہی نظر نہیں آتی، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135855941029888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان کا موقف اب بھی وہی ہے ، تبدیل نہیں ہوا، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135833392467968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نے بنی گالا اراضی ظاہر کردی تھی، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135788056289280?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">صرف 6اعشایہ 5فیصد رقم کی ٹریل ثابت نہیں ہوئی، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135329828589569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">بنی گالا اراضی بے نامی ہوبھی تو اصل مالک جمائما تھیں، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135298861969408?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نے بیوی کو قرض واپس کیا یا تحفہ دیا، ہمیں کیا فرق پڑتاہے؟ جسٹس عمر</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135176237371393?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان یہ بھی بتاچکے ہیں کہ اراضی لینی ہی جمائما کے لیےتھی، جسٹس عمر</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135069270020096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نے بتایاہےکہ رقم بیوی سے بذریعہ بینک لی ، جسٹس عمر عطابندیال</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135040111116290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">دیکھنا صرف یہ ہے کہ منی لانڈرنگ تو نہیں ہوئی؟ چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135014672756737?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">رقم جمائما نے بینک کے ذریعے بھجوائی ، تضاد کہاں سے آگیا؟ چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134882430545920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">قرض سے خریدی گئی زمین عمران خان ظاہر کرچکے ہیں، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134804424904704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">کیا میاں بیوی کے معاملے کو عدالت اس طرح دیکھ سکتی ہے؟ جسٹس عمر عطابندیال</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134779594625024?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نے 3ٹرانزیکشنز ثابت کردی ہیں، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134467563491328?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">صرف مئی میں آنے والی رقم ثابت نہیں ہوسکی، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134503596765185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">آپ میاں بیوی کی چھوٹی چھوٹی چیزیں یہاں لا کررکھ دیتے ہیں، جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134330837585920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">آپ نے ہمیں اکاؤنٹنٹ سمجھ رکھا ہے؟ جسٹس عمر عطا بندیال</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134299267059712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عدالت نے حنیف عباسی کے وکیل اکرم شیخ کو جھاڑ پلادی</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134232804184064?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[DRsohail]

Chitrol of Noon lawyer in SC today by CJ and other judges...
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">بظاہر کوئی بدنیتی اور دھوکا دہی نظر نہیں آتی، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135855941029888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان کا موقف اب بھی وہی ہے ، تبدیل نہیں ہوا، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135833392467968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نے بنی گالا اراضی ظاہر کردی تھی، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135788056289280?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">صرف 6اعشایہ 5فیصد رقم کی ٹریل ثابت نہیں ہوئی، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135329828589569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">بنی گالا اراضی بے نامی ہوبھی تو اصل مالک جمائما تھیں، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135298861969408?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نے بیوی کو قرض واپس کیا یا تحفہ دیا، ہمیں کیا فرق پڑتاہے؟ جسٹس عمر</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135176237371393?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان یہ بھی بتاچکے ہیں کہ اراضی لینی ہی جمائما کے لیےتھی، جسٹس عمر</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135069270020096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نے بتایاہےکہ رقم بیوی سے بذریعہ بینک لی ، جسٹس عمر عطابندیال</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135040111116290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">دیکھنا صرف یہ ہے کہ منی لانڈرنگ تو نہیں ہوئی؟ چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915135014672756737?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">رقم جمائما نے بینک کے ذریعے بھجوائی ، تضاد کہاں سے آگیا؟ چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134882430545920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">قرض سے خریدی گئی زمین عمران خان ظاہر کرچکے ہیں، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134804424904704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">کیا میاں بیوی کے معاملے کو عدالت اس طرح دیکھ سکتی ہے؟ جسٹس عمر عطابندیال</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134779594625024?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عمران خان نے 3ٹرانزیکشنز ثابت کردی ہیں، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134467563491328?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">صرف مئی میں آنے والی رقم ثابت نہیں ہوسکی، چیف جسٹس</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134503596765185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">آپ میاں بیوی کی چھوٹی چھوٹی چیزیں یہاں لا کررکھ دیتے ہیں، جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134330837585920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">آپ نے ہمیں اکاؤنٹنٹ سمجھ رکھا ہے؟ جسٹس عمر عطا بندیال</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134299267059712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">عدالت نے حنیف عباسی کے وکیل اکرم شیخ کو جھاڑ پلادی</p>— Geo News Urdu (@geonews_urdu) <a href="https://twitter.com/geonews_urdu/status/915134232804184064?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

thats the END wellDONE the honurable judges .now pmln should go for another drama..

 

[MenInG]

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that it still remains to be seen where money for Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan's London flat came from.

"We will have to see where the [money for the] London flat came from," Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, heading a three-judge bench of the apex court, remarked after hearing the rebuttal presented by the counsel for PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi.

The bench was hearing Abbasi’s petition which seeks the disqualification of Imran Khan and PTI secretary general Jahangir Khan Tareen over non-disclosure of assets, existence of offshore companies owned by Imran and Tareen as well as PTI being a foreign-aided party.

Earlier, as he began his rebuttal before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Abbasi's counsel, Akram Sheikh, brought into question the validity of documents submitted by Imran's lawyer regarding the transfer of funds for the purchase of the Bani Gala property.

In the previous hearing of the case, on September 28, Imran's lawyer, Naeem Bokhari, had sought to respond to the questions put forth by the SC regarding the money trail of the Bani Gala property.

Bokhari had presented documents and a letter sent by the PTI chief's former wife, Jemima, via email before the bench, verifying that Imran had returned to her a sum of Rs6.5 million that she had "gifted to him".

Abbasi's lawyer told the court that the addresses on the documents submitted by Bokhari did not match, alleging that they were not verified.

"If the documents are not verified, what should we do?" the chief justice asked, inquiring if the court had the option of calling for the real documents.

Sheikh also brought into question the £79,000 that he said Imran had paid to the architect of the Bani Gala property.

"Will they [the PTI] not tell us where this amount came from?" Sheikh asked, adding that Imran's lawyer had not submitted documents regarding the matter.

"You are assigning us the role of an account," Justice Umar Atta Bandial said in response to Sheikh's arguments. The judge told the lawyer that he had ventured outside the scope of the case and he should limit his arguments.

London flat
"How much was [Imran's] London flat bought for?" Justice Faisal Arab asked the counsel, questioning if the prosecution had challenged the defence on this matter.

Sheikh told the court that Imran had adopted the position that the Bani Gala property was bought through the sale of the London flat.

He added that Imran has had no source of income in Pakistan and that the PTI chief had accepted that his company Niazi Services Limited had remained functional till 2013.

"We have to see where the [money for the] London flat came from," the chief justice said.

Prosecution raising important questions
Sheikh also maintained Imran had transferred to Jemima a sum larger than the loan he owed her.

"If there is Rs0.1m in the bank account and the expenditure stands at Rs150,000, then there is a need for clarity," the counsel said, explaining his argument.

"The prosecution is raising highly important questions," the chief justice said while addressing PTI's lawyer.

"We will have to look at our jurisdiction to see what kind of verdict can be given," Justice Arab added.

Sheikh said that while he had not raised the question in the court, the petitioner had wondered why the sum had been transferred to Jemima through Imran's cousin, Rashid Khan. He pointed out that Khan had accepted that he had taken a loan from his former wife but had not made this apparent before the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

As the bench mulled over how transactions between a husband and a wife should be treated, Sheikh maintained that the court had already set a precedent by dismissing the review petitions of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif in the Panamagate case.

"Whether it is a father and his son or a husband and his wife, the court has established a precedent," Sheikh said. The former premier was ousted by the SC for not having declared an iqama and a salary that he had received from his son's company.

"If it is proven that Jemima's name was written on the documents regarding the Bani Gala property, I will leave this court room," Sheikh said. "What statement of Imran Khan's should we accept?"

Bani Gala money trail
"Whether Imran returned a loan to his wife or a gift will have to be made apparent," Sheikh said.

"The first thing is where did the money for the Bani Gala property come from?"Justice Bandial asked.

Bokhari, stepping in, told the bench that a few days back, the PTI chief had received the confirmation from the bank, that the SC had sought, verifying that the sum had been transferred to Jemima's account.

The chief justice pointed out that Imran had not declared the Bani Gala property in his nomination papers. "Was it required of him to declare the gift given to him by his wife?" asked the bench.

The chief justice, then, inquired after the details regarding the remaining £99,000 in the bank account of Niazi Services Ltd.

He said that details of the company's bank account provided by the defence earlier had shown the balance to be zero. Later, however, the £99,000 were shown. "We will have to see details regarding the sum," said the chief justice. 'We are reviewing the integrity of a person."

'Imran is no angel'
Shiekh argued that if a loan was pending [on Imran] in 2002, it was necessary for him to declare it.

Maintaining that if Imran had taken a loan from his wife, he should have declared it in his nomination papers, the counsel read out a paragraph from the SC's Panamagate verdict.

The paragraph pertained to Capital FZE, the Dubai-based company owned by Nawaz's son Hussain, for which the former premier served as a chairman. The salary from his position had not been declared in Nawaz's nomination papers and therefore, he was disqualified.

"To say that Imran Khan is an angel is not true," Sheikh said.

At the end of the hearing, the chief justice clarified that a verdict had not been reserved in the case and that further documents are to be presented before the court.

The hearing on Imran and Tareen's disqualification case has been adjourned until tomorrow [Wednesday].

https://www.dawn.com/news/1361460/i...ere-money-for-imrans-london-flat-came-from-sc

 

[Black Zero]

Today's headline:

It remains to be seen where money for Imran's London flat came from: SC

"The prosecution is raising highly important questions," the chief justice said while addressing PTI's lawyer.

"We will have to look at our jurisdiction to see what kind of verdict can be given," Justice Arab added.

He said that details of the company's bank account provided by the defence earlier had shown the balance to be zero. Later, however, the £99,000 were shown. "We will have to see details regarding the sum," said the chief justice. 'We are reviewing the integrity of a person."

 

[IMMY69]

PMLN are clutching at straws.

It's almost as if like they are having a surge of energy that precedes death.

 

[WebGuru]

PMLN strategy right now: Ham to doobe hen sanam tujh ko be le doobenge... That's their last wish to see IK also going down with them

 

[saeedhk]

Unsure if IK will be disqualified or not. The whole case is baseless and a sham!

Some of today's remarks were encouraging. If Imran Khan is disqualified, it will be the biggest injustice ever.

 

[DRsohail]

[MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION] what do u see //i think the case is nothing and IK is coming out to be clean.

 

[MenInG]

PMLN strategy right now: Ham to doobe hen sanam tujh ko be le doobenge... That's their last wish to see IK also going down with them

You cannot blame them for that. This is politics.

 

[IMMY69]

You cannot blame them for that. This is politics.

Not sure you can even call this politics and that's taking into account the bad reputation politicians have around the world.

 

[Black Zero]

repeat:

He said that details of the company's bank account provided by the defence earlier had shown the balance to be zero. Later, however, the £99,000 were shown. "We will have to see details regarding the sum," said the chief justice. 'We are reviewing the integrity of a person."


------
PTI failed to prove anything against NS related to Panama, however IK link to panama scandal is clear...especially when he did not declare this company.

 

[Black Zero]

it seems from court observations:

One judge is pro IK
CJ is anti
and third is on the middle.

 

[JoniInsafian]

PMLN strategy right now: Ham to doobe hen sanam tujh ko be le doobenge... That's their last wish to see IK also going down with them

If army is behind everything then why going after Khan?? Obviously Khan is behind their fall not army... And in fact army is starting to be scared of Imran khan too now so expect alliance against him

 

[Black Zero]

If army is behind everything then why going after Khan?? Obviously Khan is behind their fall not army... And in fact army is starting to be scared of Imran khan too now so expect alliance against him

It's Hanif Abbasi vs IK.
NS and Maryam called IK a chess piece(mohra).

 

[JoniInsafian]

It's Hanif Abbasi vs IK.
NS and Maryam called IK a chess piece(mohra).

Even chess piece can become king-maker once it goes to other side of board... Wait for Imran to be in government he will put army in their place

 

[Black Zero]

Even chess piece can become king-maker once it goes to other side of board... Wait for Imran to be in government he will put army in their place

Only pawns can be promotes as knight, bishop, rook or Queen.
Cannot become king or king maker.

 

[JoniInsafian]

Only pawns can be promotes as knight, bishop, rook or Queen.
Cannot become king or king maker.

Queen is king maker in chess