In-Depth Analysis of Corruption and Other Legal Charges Against Imran Khan

[LordJames]

Dear Brothers @emranabbas @Major @Mamoon

Please accept my sincere apologies if I have previously addressed you incorrectly. Kindly disregard any earlier miscommunication. If there are others who are part of this discussion but not specifically named here, consider this an open invitation to join in an honest, respectful, and truth-seeking exchange.

I would like to clarify that I am not affiliated with Imran Khan or Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in any capacity. I am also not eligible to vote or support any political party in Pakistan, nor will I ever be in such a position.

Where I live, how I earn my livelihood, where I pay taxes, and how those taxes are spent is a personal matter—just as your earnings, tax payments, and financial choices are your own business.
​

Who is Imran Khan?

He is neither a Prophet, nor a saint (Wali), nor even a deeply learned scholar of Islam. He is a human being—fallible and capable of making mistakes like anyone else.

However, when compared to the entrenched cabal of corrupt politicians and military elites in Pakistan, it is reasonable to say that he is likely better than the rest.

This is not to claim that he is perfect or ideal—only that, in relative terms, he stands out as a better option than the alternatives currently available.

Purpose of This Discussion

The focus here is Imran Khan and the allegations made against him. I respectfully request that we all stay on topic and critically evaluate the substance of the claims, rather than diverting into unrelated matters.

I assume you may be approaching this from an Islamic framework, and if so, I kindly ask that you provide clear Islamic evidence to support your assertions.

If you instead prefer to argue from a legal or secular perspective, that is also valid—please just state your approach explicitly.

In any case, when it comes to corruption allegations, kindly reference the specific Pakistani law you believe has been violated.

I am a Muslim, and I genuinely hope that this discussion remains civil, constructive, and informative. My intention is to learn, so I welcome any relevant information or perspectives that I may not be aware of.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to an enriching dialogue.​

 

[LordJames]

Imran Khan: Accusations of Being a “Jewish Agent” or “Qadiyani” — What’s the Truth?

What This Debate is Not About

This is not a discussion about whether Qadiyanis/Ahmadis fall within the fold of Islam or about the constitutional definition of a Muslim in Pakistan. That matter is settled in Article 260(3) of the Pakistani Constitution (1974 Amendment):

“A person who does not believe in the absolute and unqualified finality of the Prophethood of Muhammad (Peace be upon him), the last of the Prophets, or claims to be a Prophet in any sense or recognizes such a claimant, is not a Muslim for the purposes of the Constitution or law.”

Is Imran Khan a “Jew,” a “Jewish agent,” or a “Qadiyani” (Ahmadi)?

Any attempt to shift the discussion toward broader theological debates is a distraction. The focus is solely on the truth or falsehood of these accusations against Imran Khan.

What Has Imran Khan Publicly Stated?

At 1:34 in this video, Imran Khan unequivocally states:

“Let me make it clear. I consider the Qur’an to be the word of Allah, and whoever believes in the Qur’an is a Muslim. Since the Qur’an categorically states that Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) is the last Messenger, then whoever does not believe that cannot be a Muslim.”

This statement is consistent with both the Qur’an and the constitutional definition of a Muslim in Pakistan.

Challenge: Provide Evidence

Since this is a matter of belief and serious accusation under both Islamic and constitutional standards, anyone claiming that Imran Khan is:​

1. a Jew​
2. a Jewish agent, or​
3. a Qadiyani​

must present clear and credible Islamic evidence — not hearsay, political propaganda, or personal bias.

Without such proof, these accusations stand as baseless slander (buhtaan) — a grave sin in Islam.

Islamic Principles of Takfeer:

If you cannot then fear Allah and drop these baseless accusations from today on because the authentic narration clearly states:

Ibn Umar reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “When a man calls his brother an unbeliever, it turns against at least one of them. Either the accused is as he claimed, or else the charge will turn against him.”
[Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 6104, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 60]
​

 

[LordJames]

Did Imran Khan Marry a Jew?

Even if we assume the worst-case scenario — that Jemima Khan is Jewish and never embraced Islam — there is absolutely no issue from an Islamic perspective.

What Does Islam Say?

Marriage to a Jewish woman is explicitly permissible in Islam. The Qur’an makes this clear:

Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:5): “This day, [all] good things have been made lawful for you. The food of those who were given the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them. Also [lawful are] chaste women from among the believers and chaste women from among those who were given the Scripture before you — when you have given them their due compensation, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual relations or taking them as mistresses...”

This verse refers directly to marriage with Jews and Christians (the People of the Book) — under the condition of a proper marriage and intent for chastity.

Baseless Objection

Therefore, the claim that marrying a Jew is somehow evidence of betrayal, hypocrisy, or unbelief is not supported by the Qur’an. It is permissible, plain and simple.

If anyone believes otherwise, they must provide valid Islamic evidence, not cultural bias, political slander, or emotional arguments.​

What This Debate is Not About

Questions like “Why didn’t Jemima convert?” or “Why didn’t she cover?” are distractions—and frankly, irrelevant (see next post as to why!)

Even if she remained Jewish (worst-case scenario), Islam permits Muslim men to marry women of the Book.

As for “Why can’t Muslim women marry non-Muslims?”—that’s a separate theological issue and irrelevant to this case.

Let’s stay focused: Imran Khan did nothing un-Islamic.​

 

[LordJames]

Did Jemima Khan Have Affairs After Divorce?

The divorce between Imran Khan and Jemima Khan was finalized in 2004. Whatever choices Jemima makes as a grown woman after that point—whether personal, religious, or moral—have no bearing on Imran Khan.

Key Points:

Her post-divorce lifestyle is not his responsibility in any way. Whether she:​

1. remained a Muslim,​
2. returned to Judaism,​
3. or chose a promiscuous lifestyle,​

these are personal matters for which Imran Khan bears no religious or moral accountability.

Burden of Proof Lies on the Accuser

If someone claims that Imran Khan is blameworthy because of Jemima’s post-divorce behavior, they must bring clear and valid Islamic evidence. Without it, the accusation holds no weight in Islam and falls into the realm of slander (buhtaan) — which is a major sin.

​

 

[LordJames]

Did Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi violate the Qur’anic injunction regarding ‘Iddah?

What the Islamic Legal Tradition Says and "Minimum Length of ‘Iddah:"

According to Mufti Taqi Usmani, a highly respected Islamic scholar and former judge of the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the minimum ‘iddah period is 39 days. Reference: Allah Dad vs Mukhtar, 1992 SCMR 1273.

Who Determines Whether ‘Iddah is Complete?

In Islamic law, a woman’s own testimony about her menstruation cycle and the completion of her ‘iddah is accepted without dispute.

The Egyptian Dar al-Iftaa, quoting Al-Mughni, affirms:

“The testimony of a trustworthy woman is accepted in matters men cannot determine, such as nursing, childbirth, menstruation, and ‘iddah. There is no disagreement among scholars on this matter.”

Facts in This Case:

Bushra Bibi herself has categorically stated that her ‘iddah was complete before marriage.

Judge Muhammad Afzal Majoka of the Islamabad Additional District and Sessions Court has accepted her testimony, as per Islamic legal principles, and exonerated both parties.

Burden of Proof Lies on the Accuser

Unless Islamically valid evidence is brought forth proving that the marriage occurred within the ‘iddah period and that the woman’s own testimony is false (with witnesses, not assumptions), no accusation holds weight in Shari’ah.

Without that, continuing this claim is slander (buhtaan)—a major sin in Islam.
​

 

[LordJames]

Did Imran Khan “illegally” sell gifts and broke the law?

What is the Toshakhana?

The Toshakhana (Urdu: توشہ خانہ) is a department under Pakistan’s Cabinet Division responsible for storing and managing gifts received by public officials from foreign dignitaries. These gifts are considered state property unless lawfully retained by the recipient.

What Does the Law Say?

Under the rules in place during Imran Khan’s tenure as Prime Minister (2018–2022):​

• Public officials were allowed to purchase gifts received during official duty by paying 20% of the assessed value (later raised to 50% and then 85% in subsequent revisions).​
• Once purchased, the items became the private property of the recipient.​

What Did Imran Khan Do?
​

• Imran Khan legally purchased the gifts from Toshakhana by paying the prescribed 20% value.​
• He later sold these gifts on the open market, which is lawful once ownership is transferred.​
• He used the proceeds, among other things, to fund public works, including the repair of roads leading to the Prime Minister’s residence—not for personal luxury or private misuse.​
• The sale and income were declared in his annual tax returns filed with the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).​
• The Islamabad High Court later overturned his conviction in the Toshakhana case, citing a flawed and rushed trial process.​

What This Debate is Not About

This is not a debate about:​

• Whether the law should require 50% or more of the gift's value.​
• Whether gifts should ideally be auctioned for public transparency.​

These are policy questions, not legal violations. The core issue is simple:
Did Imran Khan break the law in force at the time?

The answer is: No, he did not.

What About Other Politicians?

Unlike Imran Khan—who:​

• Declared the gifts,​
• Paid the legally required amount,​
• Sold them lawfully,​
• Declared the proceeds in his taxes—​

Many Pakistani politicians have:
​

• Not paid even the required 20%,​
• Retained gifts unlawfully, and​
• Engaged in open corruption without accountability.​

These violations are well-documented, as reported in credible outlets like Business Recorder.
​

 

[LordJames]

The £190 Million Scandal: What Happened?
Who Is Malik Riaz?

Malik Riaz is the chairman of Bahria Town, one of Pakistan’s largest real estate empires, long accused of illegal land acquisitions, encroachment, and political manipulation. He has been a frequent subject of both Pakistani and UK-based investigations.

National Crime Agency (NCA) Investigation – UK

In December 2019, the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) entered into a settlement with Malik Riaz’s family, freezing and seizing £190 million worth of assets, including:​

• £140 million in bank accounts​
• A £50 million luxury property at 1 Hyde Park Place, London​

These were suspected proceeds of crime tied to corrupt real estate deals in Pakistan.

Key point: The NCA did not initiate a criminal trial or conviction—it settled without admission of guilt, as allowed under UK’s Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA).

The funds were to be repatriated to Pakistan under an agreement with the Asset Recovery Unit (ARU), led by Shahzad Akbar, reporting to Imran Khan’s Prime Minister’s Office.

The Allegation:
The £190 million was returned to the Supreme Court's Bahria Town account as part of an adjustment of a 2019 Supreme Court settlement in which Bahria Town owed Rs. 460 billion to the state.

The accusation is that Imran Khan, Bushra Bibi, and Shahzad Akbar:
​

1. Facilitated this arrangement without cabinet approval, and​
2. In return, allegedly received a 25-acre land allotment for Al-Qadir Trust University, whose trustees were Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi.​

Charges Against Imran Khan: Filed by NAB in 2023:

National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 "Alleging criminal breach of trust, misuse of authority, and quid pro quo corruption"

Key claims:
​

1. Cabinet approval for returning the £190m was not formally secured.​
2. Al-Qadir Trust land was allegedly a bribe.​
3. Public funds were diverted for private benefit.​

Why Imran Khan's Legal Team Asserts He Is Innocent​

1. No Personal Gain Proven: No evidence that Imran Khan personally benefited from the £190 million or received funds directly.​
2. Al-Qadir Trust University is a non-profit charity; land was donated for educational purposes, not owned privately.​
3. The Money Was Recovered, Not Lost. The £190 million was not embezzled or siphoned off—it was repatriated to Pakistan. The Pakistan government received the funds and applied them toward a pending fine on Bahria Town—still a state asset.​
4. Legal Precedent on Cabinet Approval: Cabinet ratification can be post-facto, and not all decisions require full cabinet approval in real time. No law explicitly required prior cabinet approval in this context; if it was a procedural lapse, it does not constitute corruption.​
5. No Evidence of Quid Pro Quo: The Al-Qadir Trust land donation occurred in March 2021, nearly 1.5 years after the UK settlement (2019). Imran Khan was not involved in real estate transfers; Malik Riaz’s daughter gifted the land, which is common for philanthropic causes. There is no direct link between the trust and the £190 million settlement.​
6. Politically Motivated Prosecution: The case emerged amid a broader crackdown on Imran Khan after his ouster in April​

Summary at a 5 year old level:​

• The British government put £190 million into Pakistan’s Supreme Court account — Imran Khan never touched this money.​
• The corruption case happened in Britain, so no one in Pakistan, including Imran Khan, could control it.​
• The land for the Islamic university was donated 1.5 years after the court’s decision.​
• The land was given by Malik Riaz’s daughter, not Malik Riaz himself.​

 

[LordJames]

Why did Imran Khan disown Tyrian White?

Setting the record straight

Yes, adultery/fornication is a major sin in Islam, and Imran Khan has admitted to grave mistakes from his past—like many others who lived un-Islamic lives before turning back to faith.

Today, he appears to be more practicing and conscious of Islamic values. Mocking someone for their past after they've repented is not just shameful—it’s a sin in itself.

The Prophet ﷺ warned: “Whoever taunts a Muslim for a sin he has repented from will not die until he commits it himself.” — [Tirmidhi]

We don’t defend the sin—we acknowledge it, condemn it, and leave judgment to Allah’s Mercy, not public ridicule.

Of course this is not to blame the child and this is no fault of there own.

Accepting and Acknowledging Illegitimate Children

As stated earlier, adultery is a grave sin—but in Islam, a person is not obligated to publicly acknowledge an illegitimate child.

Please understand: the issue here is public acknowledgment, not whether someone should be kind or supportive to the child.

From an Islamic standpoint, Imran Khan’s refusal to publicly acknowledge the child is not sinful, though the original act remains a serious offense.

Pakistani Constitution

By all means, change the law in Pakistan to disqualify anyone who has committed adultery or fornication from contesting elections — and apply it equally to Imran Khan and everyone else. No objections.

But as the law stands today, the matter has been legally tried multiple times, and Imran Khan has been cleared of any wrongdoing.
​

 

[Bewal Express]

Brilliant post and let's see the haters debate. I look forward to the discussion on this because it goes to the heart of the hate and misinformation from the Noora and ISI media cells. I look forward to @Major explain why he thinks the NCA money belonged to the PK state.

 

[LordJames]

Brilliant post and let's see the haters debate. I look forward to the discussion on this because it goes to the heart of the hate and misinformation from the Noora and ISI media cells. I look forward to @Major explain why he thinks the NCA money belonged to the PK state.

Personal Response:

People may ask why I speak about Imran Khan when I can't vote or take part in Pakistani politics. It's simple: he defended the honor of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) on the world stage, and I refuse to stay silent while he's falsely accused. I'm not saying he's perfect—he's human and makes mistakes—but he's not guilty of the charges used to imprison him.

Where he has made mistakes, call him out for his mistakes​

 

[Bewal Express]

Personal Response:

People may ask why I speak about Imran Khan when I can't vote or take part in Pakistani politics. It's simple: he defended the honor of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) on the world stage, and I refuse to stay silent while he's falsely accused. I'm not saying he's perfect—he's human and makes mistakes—but he's not guilty of the charges used to imprison him.

Where he has made mistakes, call him out for his mistakes​

Absolutely agree with you op. He isnt a saint and is more than infallible but he is a good man with a good heart. He could have easily taken the offers to go abroad but he didnt, even though he has been tortured in prison. Countries are built around the likes of IK but our Generals see him as a threat to their greed and unfettered power to play God.

 

[IMMY69]

How long are we going to wait?

 

[Bewal Express]

How long are we going to wait?

These guys know they are dishonest and when their lies are exposed they run.

 

[LordJames]

How long are we going to wait?

My intention is to have an honest dialogue and find out what I am missing.

These guys know they are dishonest and when their lies are exposed they run.

These are our Muslim brothers and we all have the right to disagree.

Lets have a polite and courteous exchange of ideas.

 

[Major]

Post no.1, post no.2, post no.3 and post no.4 are irrelevent.

First of all its highly offensive to refer ahamadis as qadiyanis. Whether anyone is an ahmadi or not is an irrelevant discussion and i dont care. Judaism is a religion, marrying a jew, christian, atheist are stupid discussions. Jemimah can marrying or have an affair with whomever one she likes.

There is no discussion in this thread. Because not a single post is an opinion of yours. You used chatgpt and posted whatever you found from there.

To build a narrative from chatgpt is very easy. I can also use chatgpt is build a narrative in my favor. So sorry, this is not an analysis or a debate.

Its only a debate when you actually type it up and give your own opinion.

The NCA investigation was covered by DAWN really well. https://www.dawn.com/news/1618221/malik-riaz-the-art-of-the-deal

The money was returned by UK to Pakistan, yet Imran gave it back to Malik Riaz. He set himself up. End of story. Doesnt matter what narrative you build form ChatGpt.

I dont care about Bushra's iddat. But I have 0 respect for a women who has held a long marriage with a person and have grown adult children, but still divorces to marry someone else just to fulfill her lust at such an age. I have 0 respect for Imran who just stole another mans wife.

I dont care what any religion says, in our culture this is low and pathetic.

 

[LordJames]

Post no.1, post no.2, post no.3 and post no.4 are irrelevent.

Sure, please go ahead and point out the irrelevancies.

First of all its highly offensive to refer ahamadis as qadiyanis. Whether anyone is an ahmadi or not is an irrelevant discussion and i dont care. Judaism is a religion, marrying a jew, christian, atheist are stupid discussions. Jemimah can marrying or have an affair with whomever one she likes.

First point is irrelevant and for rest you have not posted anything substantial or have any disagreements.

There is no discussion in this thread. Because not a single post is an opinion of yours. You used chatgpt and posted whatever you found from there.

To build a narrative from chatgpt is very easy. I can also use chatgpt is build a narrative in my favor. So sorry, this is not an analysis or a debate.

Irrelevant but please feel free to use ChatGPT or whatever you want to build a counter narrative.

The NCA investigation was covered by DAWN really well. https://www.dawn.com/news/1618221/malik-riaz-the-art-of-the-deal

Your link has an embedded link to the issue which is covered by Dawn here: https://www.dawn.com/news/1520223 and I quote two lines:

1. The National Crime Agency (NCA) of the United Kingdom has agreed to a settlement worth £190 million with the family of property tycoon Malik Riaz.
2. The assets will be returned to the State of Pakistan.

The report from your own links shows that it has nothing to do with Imran Khan!

I dont care about Bushra's iddat. But I have 0 respect for a women who has held a long marriage with a person and have grown adult children, but still divorces to marry someone else just to fulfill her lust at such an age. I have 0 respect for Imran who just stole another mans wife.

I dont care what any religion says, in our culture this is low and pathetic.

So far you have given zero evidence for anything and on this issue, I don't understand what you are saying.

1. What is your problem with divorce?
2. What is your evidence that she followed her lust?
3. What is your evidence that Imran Khan stole someone's wife?
4. So your culture is higher then your religion? Sorry can you name your religion and your culture so I am clear as to what is higher and what is lower?

 

[Bewal Express]

Post no.1, post no.2, post no.3 and post no.4 are irrelevent.

First of all its highly offensive to refer ahamadis as qadiyanis. Whether anyone is an ahmadi or not is an irrelevant discussion and i dont care. Judaism is a religion, marrying a jew, christian, atheist are stupid discussions. Jemimah can marrying or have an affair with whomever one she likes.

There is no discussion in this thread. Because not a single post is an opinion of yours. You used chatgpt and posted whatever you found from there.

To build a narrative from chatgpt is very easy. I can also use chatgpt is build a narrative in my favor. So sorry, this is not an analysis or a debate.

Its only a debate when you actually type it up and give your own opinion.

The NCA investigation was covered by DAWN really well. https://www.dawn.com/news/1618221/malik-riaz-the-art-of-the-deal

The money was returned by UK to Pakistan, yet Imran gave it back to Malik Riaz. He set himself up. End of story. Doesnt matter what narrative you build form ChatGpt.

I dont care about Bushra's iddat. But I have 0 respect for a women who has held a long marriage with a person and have grown adult children, but still divorces to marry someone else just to fulfill her lust at such an age. I have 0 respect for Imran who just stole another mans wife.

I dont care what any religion says, in our culture this is low and pathetic.

No the money was a settlement between MR and the NCA- it was a civil settlement. He decided that he wanted it to be used to pay off the SC debt. That is just a fact. This is the reason why the appeal hasnt been heard by the Generali Judges because they and the Junta would be embarrassed. Surely it doesnt take 8 months to hear the appeal. So a blatant caught.

 

[Bewal Express]

Sure, please go ahead and point out the irrelevancies.



First point is irrelevant and for rest you have not posted anything substantial or have any disagreements.


Irrelevant but please feel free to use ChatGPT or whatever you want to build a counter narrative.



Your link has an embedded link to the issue which is covered by Dawn here: https://www.dawn.com/news/1520223 and I quote two lines:

1. The National Crime Agency (NCA) of the United Kingdom has agreed to a settlement worth £190 million with the family of property tycoon Malik Riaz.
2. The assets will be returned to the State of Pakistan.

The report from your own links shows that it has nothing to do with Imran Khan!



So far you have given zero evidence for anything and on this issue, I don't understand what you are saying.

1. What is your problem with divorce?
2. What is your evidence that she followed her lust?
3. What is your evidence that Imran Khan stole someone's wife?
4. So your culture is higher then your religion? Sorry can you name your religion and your culture so I am clear as to what is higher and what is lower?

@Major should has no evidence, just ISI and Noora titbits.

 

[Bewal Express]

Post no.1, post no.2, post no.3 and post no.4 are irrelevent.

First of all its highly offensive to refer ahamadis as qadiyanis. Whether anyone is an ahmadi or not is an irrelevant discussion and i dont care. Judaism is a religion, marrying a jew, christian, atheist are stupid discussions. Jemimah can marrying or have an affair with whomever one she likes.

There is no discussion in this thread. Because not a single post is an opinion of yours. You used chatgpt and posted whatever you found from there.

To build a narrative from chatgpt is very easy. I can also use chatgpt is build a narrative in my favor. So sorry, this is not an analysis or a debate.

Its only a debate when you actually type it up and give your own opinion.

The NCA investigation was covered by DAWN really well. https://www.dawn.com/news/1618221/malik-riaz-the-art-of-the-deal

The money was returned by UK to Pakistan, yet Imran gave it back to Malik Riaz. He set himself up. End of story. Doesnt matter what narrative you build form ChatGpt.

I dont care about Bushra's iddat. But I have 0 respect for a women who has held a long marriage with a person and have grown adult children, but still divorces to marry someone else just to fulfill her lust at such an age. I have 0 respect for Imran who just stole another mans wife.

I dont care what any religion says, in our culture this is low and pathetic.

Who asked you to respect Bushra Bibi. That is a pathetic and weak argument. The PK state have interfered in a personal matter to persecute her and her husband. I thought you were more educated and better than that. That is what the Schizophrenic would say.@Mamoon

 

[Bewal Express]

My intention is to have an honest dialogue and find out what I am missing.


These are our Muslim brothers and we all have the right to disagree.

Lets have a polite and courteous exchange of ideas.

You niyaat is clean but you are dealing with immoral cretins. Look at the lies on Bushra Bibi and the NCA agreement. @Major why are they running from the appeals. The Prosecution apparently couldn't find a counsel and then the Judge run off. Why?

 

[LordJames]

No the money was a settlement between MR and the NCA- it was a civil settlement. He decided that he wanted it to be used to pay off the SC debt. That is just a fact. This is the reason why the appeal hasnt been heard by the Generali Judges because they and the Junta would be embarrassed. Surely it doesnt take 8 months to hear the appeal. So a blatant caught.

@Major has provided link in his response and I quote @Major "The NCA investigation was covered by DAWN really well"

Malik Riaz & the art of the deal

The Pakistani state went out of its way to ensure that the property tycoon’s £190m settlement in the UK worked out in his favour.

www.dawn.com

Line 13 of the article has "Dawn Report" on the £190 million out-of-court civil settlement with Mr Riaz which is here:

SC accepts Bahria Town’s offer of Rs460bn to settle Malir cases

Settlement amount has to be paid in seven years

www.dawn.com

Both of the links provided by @Major do not even mention "Imran Khan" let alone make any links to the money or corruption

Absolute zilch, Nada, nothing to do with Imran Khan in the links which @Major has provided in his response.

You niyaat is clean but you are dealing with immoral cretins. Look at the lies on Bushra Bibi and the NCA agreement. @Major

So we wait for a response...let them respond with any "Niyyat" and any means or methods or tools AI or without AI

@Major is free to use any tools he wants, waiting for him to respond to the issue.

 

[Bewal Express]

@Major has provided link in his response and I quote @Major "The NCA investigation was covered by DAWN really well"

Malik Riaz & the art of the deal

The Pakistani state went out of its way to ensure that the property tycoon’s £190m settlement in the UK worked out in his favour.

www.dawn.com

Line 13 of the article has "Dawn Report" on the £190 million out-of-court civil settlement with Mr Riaz which is here:

SC accepts Bahria Town’s offer of Rs460bn to settle Malir cases

Settlement amount has to be paid in seven years

www.dawn.com

Both of the links provided by @Major do not even mention "Imran Khan" let alone make any links to the money or corruption

Absolute zilch, Nada, nothing to do with Imran Khan in the links which @Major has provided in his response.



So we wait for a response...let them respond with any "Niyyat" and any means or methods or tools AI or without AI

@Major is free to use any tools he wants, waiting for him to respond to the issue.

@Major should also explain why the SC fined MR and who took bribes off him in Karachi and then why the Sindh govt kept quiet although the land was stolen from Villagers they were elected to represent and later who wanted the money?

 

[LordJames]

@Major should also explain why the SC fined MR and who took bribes off him in Karachi and then why the Sindh govt kept quiet although the land was stolen from Villagers they were elected to represent and later who wanted the money?

Sure brother and @Major can answer that in a different topic on a different day

Today @Major has provided this link while stating "The NCA investigation was covered by DAWN really well"

Malik Riaz & the art of the deal

The Pakistani state went out of its way to ensure that the property tycoon’s £190m settlement in the UK worked out in his favour.

www.dawn.com

This has nothing to do with Imran Khan and nowhere does it mention Imran Khan

So I guess that @Major can:

1. Point out where his links ascribe corruption to Imran Khan
2. OR provide more information or evidence for corruption of Imran Khan which he has repeatedly mentioned.

If @Major thinks Imran Khan is guilty of corruption of £190 million then he must have some proof.

So we wait...

 

[Bewal Express]

@LordJames
@Major
Look into who the Judge the Junta appointed to hear the case. The Judge Nasir Javed Rana is more bent than the AZ and NS. Surely major sahib they could found someone with a modicum of respectability if this case had any legs.

 

[aboveandbeyond]

This thread could well be a kryptonite for certain few we know who spun and derailed everything

Please don't hesitate to come forward

 

[LordJames]

Why did Imran Khan disown Tyrian White?

Setting the record straight

Yes, adultery/fornication is a major sin in Islam, and Imran Khan has admitted to grave mistakes from his past—like many others who lived un-Islamic lives before turning back to faith.

Today, he appears to be more practicing and conscious of Islamic values. Mocking someone for their past after they've repented is not just shameful—it’s a sin in itself.

The Prophet ﷺ warned: “Whoever taunts a Muslim for a sin he has repented from will not die until he commits it himself.” — [Tirmidhi]

We don’t defend the sin—we acknowledge it, condemn it, and leave judgment to Allah’s Mercy, not public ridicule.

Of course this is not to blame the child and this is no fault of there own.

Accepting and Acknowledging Illegitimate Children

As stated earlier, adultery is a grave sin—but in Islam, a person is not obligated to publicly acknowledge an illegitimate child.

Please understand: the issue here is public acknowledgment, not whether someone should be kind or supportive to the child.

From an Islamic standpoint, Imran Khan’s refusal to publicly acknowledge the child is not sinful, though the original act remains a serious offense.

Pakistani Constitution

By all means, change the law in Pakistan to disqualify anyone who has committed adultery or fornication from contesting elections — and apply it equally to Imran Khan and everyone else. No objections.

But as the law stands today, the matter has been legally tried multiple times, and Imran Khan has been cleared of any wrongdoing.
​

Brother @Mamoon

Please feel free to offer a differing view from a qualified Islamic authority if one exists. However, based on my understanding, Islam permits not publicly acknowledging an illegitimate child.

I'm not engaging in a discussion about morality or cultural norms. From what I gather, Imran Khan has not violated any clear Islamic injunctions or Pakistani laws in this matter.

Multiple courts in Pakistan have also exonerated him on the issue.

I understand that you may hold a different personal view, and that’s entirely your right. However, as a doctor, I hope you can at least acknowledge that there is a legitimate alternative perspective on this matter — even if you strongly disagree with it. Or do you feel it is appropriate to impose your own views on others, rather than allow space for differing opinions?

Hoping for a mature, sensible and professional discussion with you on this topic.

Thank you.​

 

[Patriot]

I’m no supporter of PTI nor do I have anything against Imran Khan, but I can’t get over the £190m scandal involving Malik Riaz.

1. The U.K. National Crime Agency does not settle. That is not how they operate and they can do it without a criminal case. If they suspect money laundering or anything that is fraudulent, they will freeze assets and take control of it. That money belonged to Pakistan and should not have been used by the Imran Khan, cabinet approval or not to settle what Malik Riaz owned. What Malik Riaz owed should have been separate and in addition to that £190m. However, I don’t see how Imran Khan personally benefited out of this situation other than the charity donation.

2. The donation is extremely dodgy. Why did it go to Imran Khan’s charity? There are so many charities operating across Pakistan. Why could it have not gone anywhere else. If Imran Khan had any sense, he would have made sure to keep his charities out of this purely for ethical purposes.

For those accusing Imran’s wife of divorcing her husband so she could marry Imran, in Islam, accusing someone’s character is very serious and should be carefully done and not spread in public. Also, what evidence is there that she did this and the marriage was not valid.

 

[LordJames]

I’m no supporter of PTI nor do I have anything against Imran Khan, but I can’t get over the £190m scandal involving Malik Riaz.

1. The U.K. National Crime Agency does not settle. That is not how they operate and they can do it without a criminal case. If they suspect money laundering or anything that is fraudulent, they will freeze assets and take control of it. That money belonged to Pakistan and should not have been used by the Imran Khan, cabinet approval or not to settle what Malik Riaz owned. What Malik Riaz owed should have been separate and in addition to that £190m. However, I don’t see how Imran Khan personally benefited out of this situation other than the charity donation.

2. The donation is extremely dodgy. Why did it go to Imran Khan’s charity? There are so many charities operating across Pakistan. Why could it have not gone anywhere else. If Imran Khan had any sense, he would have made sure to keep his charities out of this purely for ethical purposes.

For those accusing Imran’s wife of divorcing her husband so she could marry Imran, in Islam, accusing someone’s character is very serious and should be carefully done and not spread in public. Also, what evidence is there that she did this and the marriage was not valid.

Brother,
I am enclosing all the links for you or anyone else to verify and correct the record.

Facts:

1. The investigations against Malik Riaz (by NAB in Pakistan) and National Crime Agency in UK started in 2017 but reached its climax in 2018​
2. Imran Khan was Prime Minister between 13 August 2018 – 21 October 2022​
3. Daughter of Malik Riaz donated land to Imran Khan which was used to build Al-Qadir University which is a trust in April 2019​
4. Imran Khan did the groundbreaking ceremony of the Al-Qadir University on May 05, 2019.​
5. Malik Riaz agreed to settle with National Crime Agency in UK in December 2019 for 190 million with the British Government ​
6. Pakistan Government received the agreement from National Crime Agency in UK in December 2019 ​
7. The 190 million was paid by British Government into Bank Account of Supreme Court of Pakistan and remains there to this day. Imran Khan or PTI or anyone else never had access to the money and the case isn't about the money.​

In other words, the groundbreaking of Al-Qadir University was a full 6 months BEFORE Malik Riaz even agreed to settle with the British Government.

The money never went to Imran Khan and remains to this day in the Bank Account of Supreme Court of Pakistan from the time it was sent by British Government. The money was never used by Al-Qadir University and not meant for it.

If your objection is that daughter of Malik Riaz donated land as a bribe for Imran Khan Government to facilitate or reach a deal with the British Government, the land is for Al-Qadir University, Imran Khan or PTI still didn't benefit!​

 

[Patriot]

Brother,
I am enclosing all the links for you or anyone else to verify and correct the record.

Facts:

1. The investigations against Malik Riaz (by NAB in Pakistan) and National Crime Agency in UK started in 2017 but reached its climax in 2018​
2. Imran Khan was Prime Minister between 13 August 2018 – 21 October 2022​
3. Daughter of Malik Riaz donated land to Imran Khan which was used to build Al-Qadir University which is a trust in April 2019​
4. Imran Khan did the groundbreaking ceremony of the Al-Qadir University on May 05, 2019.​
5. Malik Riaz agreed to settle with National Crime Agency in UK in December 2019 for 190 million with the British Government ​
6. Pakistan Government received the agreement from National Crime Agency in UK in December 2019 ​
7. The 190 million was paid by British Government into Bank Account of Supreme Court of Pakistan and remains there to this day. Imran Khan or PTI or anyone else never had access to the money and the case isn't about the money.​

In other words, the groundbreaking of Al-Qadir University was a full 6 months BEFORE Malik Riaz even agreed to settle with the British Government.

The money never went to Imran Khan and remains to this day in the Bank Account of Supreme Court of Pakistan from the time it was sent by British Government. The money was never used by Al-Qadir University and not meant for it.

If your objection is that daughter of Malik Riaz donated land as a bribe for Imran Khan Government to facilitate or reach a deal with the British Government, the land is for Al-Qadir University, Imran Khan or PTI still didn't benefit!​

If that is the correct timeline, then I will agree that there does not appear to be corruption committed. If the donation was before the NCA even obtained the £190m, then the donation could not have been to bribe Imran Khan and if the money went straight to the supreme court’s account then I can’t see any wrongdoing there either.

Thanks for correcting my understanding.

 

[LordJames]

If that is the correct timeline, then I will agree that there does not appear to be corruption committed. If the donation was before the NCA even obtained the £190m, then the donation could not have been to bribe Imran Khan and if the money went straight to the supreme court’s account then I can’t see any wrongdoing there either.

Thanks for correcting my understanding.

Al-Qadir Trust Case:

Just to add to the issue

Imran Khan or PTI has never been charged with embezzling or misappropriating 190 million from the British Government. That money has a clear money trail and sitting in the Bank Account of Supreme Court of Pakistan, no issues there.

The charges on Imran Khan are that he took land from (daughter of Malik Riaz) which was actually by Malik Riaz to facilitate a deal with the British Government aka "Quid pro quo". The military Government of Pakistan have put intense pressure on Malik Riaz to come to Pakistan OR testify against Imran Khan and affirm the "Quid pro quo" deal which Malik Riaz never did.

That (donated) land never benefited Imran Khan or PTI and there is Al-Qadir University standing on it and that is also clear. The is used by Al-Qadir University an run by a "Not for Profit" Trust known legally in Pakistan as a "Public Trust" and Imran Khan's wife is a Trustee.

1. Imran Khan is in Jail for facilitating a "Quid pro quo" land deal
2. Imran Khan's wife is in Jail for being a Trustee for Al-Qadir University which is built on land acquired via a "Quid pro quo" land deal

There is no actual proof of any corruption and Al-Qadir University (land, building, staff) are all run by a Public Trust and teaches poor students on Scholarship, from the Academic side the two American scholars involved were:

1. Yasir Qadhi
2. Shaykh Hamza Yusuf (consultant role)

Why did Malik Riaz (or his daughter donate the land)?

He is ashrewd businessman and his model is to develop land. He donated useless tract of land for a university to develop Road links so he can then develop a community around it. The land is literally in the middle of nowhere!

What is Imran Khan's biggest issue?

He is too trusting and too naive (even stupid)! Alarm bells should have gone in his head the minute Malik Riaz decided to donate anything

But then same Imran Khan gave extension to the Army Chief who did a coup against his Government

So Imran Khan is literally that stupid when it comes to people.

 

[Bewal Express]

Al-Qadir Trust Case:

Just to add to the issue

Imran Khan or PTI has never been charged with embezzling or misappropriating 190 million from the British Government. That money has a clear money trail and sitting in the Bank Account of Supreme Court of Pakistan, no issues there.

The charges on Imran Khan are that he took land from (daughter of Malik Riaz) which was actually by Malik Riaz to facilitate a deal with the British Government aka "Quid pro quo". The military Government of Pakistan have put intense pressure on Malik Riaz to come to Pakistan OR testify against Imran Khan and affirm the "Quid pro quo" deal which Malik Riaz never did.

That (donated) land never benefited Imran Khan or PTI and there is Al-Qadir University standing on it and that is also clear. The is used by Al-Qadir University an run by a "Not for Profit" Trust known legally in Pakistan as a "Public Trust" and Imran Khan's wife is a Trustee.

1. Imran Khan is in Jail for facilitating a "Quid pro quo" land deal
2. Imran Khan's wife is in Jail for being a Trustee for Al-Qadir University which is built on land acquired via a "Quid pro quo" land deal

There is no actual proof of any corruption and Al-Qadir University (land, building, staff) are all run by a Public Trust and teaches poor students on Scholarship, from the Academic side the two American scholars involved were:

1. Yasir Qadhi
2. Shaykh Hamza Yusuf (consultant role)

Why did Malik Riaz (or his daughter donate the land)?

He is ashrewd businessman and his model is to develop land. He donated useless tract of land for a university to develop Road links so he can then develop a community around it. The land is literally in the middle of nowhere!

What is Imran Khan's biggest issue?

He is too trusting and too naive (even stupid)! Alarm bells should have gone in his head the minute Malik Riaz decided to donate anything

But then same Imran Khan gave extension to the Army Chief who did a coup against his Government

So Imran Khan is literally that stupid when it comes to people.

The case is so weak that it took a judge that a SC verdict against him to convict. Then to avoid the appeal the Prosecutor claimed he needed more time and then the Judge run off and said he is going on holiday.
As you say- all the money is with the SC, the money belonged to MR based upon his agreement with NCA and no evidence has been offered on the contrary. IK or his family have not benefited and never will in any form. So where is the corruption

 

[The Bald Eagle]

Meanwhile the actions of current governments​

====

Opposition alliance urges CJP to act on Rs300bn sugar scandal​

The Tehreek Tahaffuz-e-Ain has written to Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi, urging him to take suo motu notice of an alleged sugar industry scandal in which mills reportedly profited by Rs300 billion due to recent price fluctuations.Pakistan travel guide

In a letter addressed to the CJP, Vice Chairman Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar called for the formation of a commission under Article 184(3) of the Constitution to investigate suspected policy manipulation and regulatory failures.

Khokhar requested that the issue be urgently referred to a three-member committee or that the letter be treated as a formal petition to initiate judicial proceedings.

"The future of the country's economic stability and citizens’ trust in governance hinges on prompt and decisive action," the letter added.

It further highlighted that the Public Accounts Committee was informed on Tuesday, July 29, that sugar mills had earned Rs300 billion through recent rate hikes.

CCP reschedules hearing

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has postponed the hearing of the sugar cartel case after over 70 sugar mills requested a delay, citing the unavailability of legal counsel due to the Supreme Court’s summer recess.


In a statement issued on Monday, the CCP announced that the hearing will now take place from September 22 to 25. The decision follows multiple adjournment pleas submitted by sugar mills.

More than 50 mills have also filed appeals in the Supreme Court challenging the tribunal’s decision directing the CCP to rehear the case.

The commission clarified that the hearing has been deferred once to fulfil the requirements of a fair trial. However, it emphasised that no further delay or adjournment would be granted.Pakistan travel guide

The CCP stated that the case proceedings will be conducted daily.

Read: CCP to hear sugar pricing case today

Earlier in May, the Competition Appellate Tribunal had returned the case to the CCP for rehearing after announcing its verdict on the appeals filed by the sugar mills and the association against a Rs44b fine.

The tribunal instructed that the case be reheard under the supervision of the CCP chairperson or any other member who was not previously involved in the hearings.

The tribunal also ordered the commission to complete the rehearing and issue a verdict within 90 days.

In 2021, the CCP imposed a Rs44 billion fine on the PSMA and its member mills for forming a cartel to fix sugar prices and engaging in other anti-competitive practices

Source: The Express Tribune

 

[LordJames]

Meanwhile the actions of current governments​

====

Opposition alliance urges CJP to act on Rs300bn sugar scandal​

The Tehreek Tahaffuz-e-Ain has written to Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi, urging him to take suo motu notice of an alleged sugar industry scandal in which mills reportedly profited by Rs300 billion due to recent price fluctuations.Pakistan travel guide

In a letter addressed to the CJP, Vice Chairman Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar called for the formation of a commission under Article 184(3) of the Constitution to investigate suspected policy manipulation and regulatory failures.

Khokhar requested that the issue be urgently referred to a three-member committee or that the letter be treated as a formal petition to initiate judicial proceedings.

"The future of the country's economic stability and citizens’ trust in governance hinges on prompt and decisive action," the letter added.

It further highlighted that the Public Accounts Committee was informed on Tuesday, July 29, that sugar mills had earned Rs300 billion through recent rate hikes.

CCP reschedules hearing

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has postponed the hearing of the sugar cartel case after over 70 sugar mills requested a delay, citing the unavailability of legal counsel due to the Supreme Court’s summer recess.


In a statement issued on Monday, the CCP announced that the hearing will now take place from September 22 to 25. The decision follows multiple adjournment pleas submitted by sugar mills.

More than 50 mills have also filed appeals in the Supreme Court challenging the tribunal’s decision directing the CCP to rehear the case.

The commission clarified that the hearing has been deferred once to fulfil the requirements of a fair trial. However, it emphasised that no further delay or adjournment would be granted.Pakistan travel guide

The CCP stated that the case proceedings will be conducted daily.

Read: CCP to hear sugar pricing case today

Earlier in May, the Competition Appellate Tribunal had returned the case to the CCP for rehearing after announcing its verdict on the appeals filed by the sugar mills and the association against a Rs44b fine.

The tribunal instructed that the case be reheard under the supervision of the CCP chairperson or any other member who was not previously involved in the hearings.

The tribunal also ordered the commission to complete the rehearing and issue a verdict within 90 days.

In 2021, the CCP imposed a Rs44 billion fine on the PSMA and its member mills for forming a cartel to fix sugar prices and engaging in other anti-competitive practices

Source: The Express Tribune

Meanwhile

Imran Khan nominated Dr Arif Alvi to be president of Pakistan, a Dentist who went back to being a Dentist at the end of his term.

Those who think Imran Khan is corrupt have Asif Ali Zardari as President, let me post a huge picture so you can enjoy your achievement!

 

[Major]

Yara, mayree candid photo layna. Asa lagay kay sub nromal hai, koi security wala koi nahi, aur meh ider bench per sora hun. Photo layker phir Rawal Lounge mein jakar aram kartay.

But sir, woh table hai hai and sat apkay priority sitting.

Tou? meh president hun, table per pao rakh sakta hun.

 

[LordJames]

Yara, mayree candid photo layna. Asa lagay kay sub nromal hai, koi security wala koi nahi, aur meh ider bench per sora hun. Photo layker phir Rawal Lounge mein jakar aram kartay.

But sir, woh table hai hai and sat apkay priority sitting.

Tou? meh president hun, table per pao rakh sakta hun.

View attachment 156594

Corruption?

I believe you to be a good, honest, and truthful person.

Now, please go ahead and state—clearly—that you believe Dr. Arif Alvi is more corrupt than Asif Ali Zardari. I won’t respond, argue, or object. I’ll simply leave you to your own thinking.

But if, deep down, you know you can’t say that in good conscience—and you believe Zardari to be the more corrupt of the two—then I’ll leave you to wrestle with your own sense of morality.

Either way, let’s see if you reply.

​

I dont care what any religion says, in our culture this is low and pathetic.

Still don't know your religion and your culture which you believe to be superior to your religion.

Thanks