Stewie
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2008
- Runs
- 16,367
Thats my point: you are just proving it. We have a huge population in the subcontinent but our professionalism and lack of efficiency is what is holding us from reaching the heights we should reach.India may be populous but it ain't a rich country, per capital spent on sports would be miniscule compared to the countries proficient in sports. Well who am I telling, i doubt you would understand such things but lemme give it a last shot. If population size and it's interest level could determine wold champions then since 1975 every final should have been between India and Pakistan.
But more to the point, anything before the 90s should not count because the sport was not commercialized and did not involve the money that it does now prior to the 90s. In fact I would even say 2000 because thats when the Indians started exploiting their position in world cricket and became a financial power house.
But Pakistan does not have the same amount of money India has. You need proper structure in place for your huge sports crazy population to truly take advantage of and pakistan and bangladesh dont have it. India does. so I think its more a failure for the Indians to actually make a dent in the sports.


