Syed1
ODI Captain
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Runs
- 46,041
- Post of the Week
- 3
Jaddu.
Clean nick.
Not given.
Even KW's face said it all.
Review kar lehtay na

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jaddu.
Clean nick.
Not given.
Even KW's face said it all.
Review kar lehtay na![]()
Think it was a bottom edge. Although snicko picked up a late noise (after it went past the bat).
Jaddu.
Clean nick.
Not given.
Even KW's face said it all.
If he were batting India would be forced to field an entire new bowlig line up in the next test
Yet it didn't match up.Jaddu.
Clean nick.
Not given.
Even KW's face said it all.
Yet it didn't match up.
Not going to give it till there's more evidence (hot spot, would have been better than snicko in this case).
You can't immediately assume it's a nick when there's a big gap in frames.
DRS isn't that straightforward, there was a lack of evidence and even Jadeja didn't go up till Saha did.Yeah dude. KW's falling face was just a coincidence.
Its ok. I am not too flustered with it but anyone can see it was out.
DRS isn't that straightforward, there was a lack of evidence and even Jadeja didn't go up till Saha did.
KW has been filthy with himself plenty of times playing shots he shouldn't or falling away on shots.
When did this happen?
Even with the DRS, they probably would have gone with the umpires decision because of the lack of evidence (sound and frames not matching up). Hawkeye would have cleared any doubt, but it's not being used this series.
You mean hawk eye, and no without hawkeye, that shouldn't have been given purely on that evidence (noise after the ball passing the bat).As you said Hawkeye would have cleared that up.
Since the snicko and everything is not 100% reliable, ICC uses all technologies simultaneously.
In a proper DRS setting, this was out dude.
There are plenty of countries who use DRS without hotspot... I don't know if that is out, because on the snicko evidence, it definitely isn't out.If DRS was employed the nick would have showed up on the hot spot.
Stop trying to spin it in India's favour. India got hard done by the ump and their board's hesitance to accept the future.
Kohli initially looked a bit vocal about DRS but seems to be quiet now.
You'd be surprised by the amount of times we've played a series without both snicko and hotspot.You are now talking like a lawyer defending a rape accused.
If DRS was there, all will be used.
You'd be surprised by the amount of times we've played a series without both snicko and hotspot.
You'd be surprised by the amount of times we've played a series without both snicko and hotspot.
You mean Kohli wants DRS or doesn't want now?
I think I may have misunderstood you Jaded.
What about hawk eye?
Anyways, odds are high that would be given out.
Through viewing, it was surely out.
Anyways, not a big deal. India deserves to get as much screwed over as possible reg this issue.
He wanted it a dialogue on it before,if you see his interviews but now isn't as vocal about its use.Its the opposite of what you understood![]()
Hawkeye is usually a given.What about hawk eye?
Anyways, odds are high that would be given out.
Through viewing, it was surely out.
Anyways, not a big deal. India deserves to get as much screwed over as possible reg this issue.
what happened to the plain old envelope through the hotel door the night before the match, IMO more effective than any DRS![]()
Oh sorry.
That makes no sense though.
If DRS was employed the nick would have showed up on the hot spot.
Stop trying to spin it in India's favour. India got hard done by the ump and their board's hesitance to accept the future.
DRS isn't that straightforward, there was a lack of evidence and even Jadeja didn't go up till Saha did.
IMO the umpires decision would have stood. Had he been given out, then he would have been out.
KW has been filthy with himself plenty of times playing shots he shouldn't or falling away on shots.
Come on Aman, you're the most vocal about Kohli nicking it behind but not given out and going on to make a century in New Zealand.
You should maintain your stance for Kane too in India.![]()
I didn't hear anything live, then was shown footage where the noise did not match up with the frames. Why should I think it's out?Come on Aman, you're the most vocal about Kohli nicking it behind but not given out and going on to make a century in New Zealand.
You should maintain your stance for Kane too in India.![]()
I didn't hear anything live, then was shown footage where the noise did not match up with the frames. Why should I think it's out?
[MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] I do rate the NZ spinners over Indian spinners in this match.
Santner, Sodhi, Craig > Ashwin and Jadeja
Did not watch Day-2, but what happened? Is it mediocre bowling from India or exceptional batting by Kiwis?
I do believe that if India can break this partnership early tomorrow morning, we can shut the kiwis for under 275.
India were also 152/1 at one point. One wicket and the wheels came off.
Unfortunately for you guys. NZ don't have Rohit Sharma in their side
What the hell?
Why this rain suddenly?! No wonder when NZ is on a roll, rain stops the play. Easily NZ's match to lose this.
ICC=BCCI=rain!
Did not watch Day-2, but what happened? Is it mediocre bowling from India or exceptional batting by Kiwis?
I do believe that if India can break this partnership early tomorrow morning, we can shut the kiwis for under 275.
India were also 152/1 at one point. One wicket and the wheels came off.
Guptil is already out FYI.They have Guptill.
Latham is decent. I see only 2 quality batsmen in Kiwi side. One is Kane and the other is Wattling.
I never trust Ross Taylor. Luke Ronchi is hit or miss. And then there is a long tail.
I still back India to get a lead in the 1st innings.
Just read Cricinfo, it seems the last few deliveries from Ashwin before the rain took sharp turn and beat the bat of KW.
Interesting Day-3 a head. If it rains tomorrow, the match will be a draw.
Guptil is already out FYI.
[MENTION=132954]Aman[/MENTION] Who you got on the bench to replace Guptill?
It depends on how the pitch plays.
NZ are making India pay the price for stupid batting. This was a simple 400-500 pitch first innings of the game. We made 318. Minimum 100 runs below par.
If the pitch turns big right away (not sure if it would happen now with rain), then NZ is in big trouble with 170 runs behind. Their 2 bats barely survived the last 30 minutes and one was even out.
If the pitch turns big much later on, then NZ can get a sizable 50-100 run lead and India would most likely end up giving a target of just 100.
Mumbai 2012 can happen. Or NZ can collapse tomorrow and we could have a 75 run lead which could be deadly.
The first hour of play is the key. If NZ loses Kane, they will end up conceding lead to India. If Kane bats even for another 40 overs, NZ will get the lead.
From the reports, the pitch is expected to turn from Day-3. Lets see tomorrow what happens provided weather cooperates.
Rain factor can impact pitch.
Also tomorrow, we could see a session washed off too.
Very interesting day nonetheless.
Santner is good.
Sodhi is a poor man's Mishra.
Craig is decent.