What's new

India v Sri Lanka | 3rd ODI | Nov 9, 2014 | Hyderabad

Status
Not open for further replies.

desi_launda

T20I Debutant
Joined
Mar 3, 2014
Runs
6,708
Sri Lanka 5/1 after 1 over
Jayasuria 2.0 again gone in first over.terrific ball by Yadav :waqar
 
If he is fit, he is in. He has pace, swing and now accuracy too. Cant have him on the bench.

He has a poor record in ODIs.Did well in recent ODIs but Ishant and Aaron have done well too.So competition is there
 
lol why does sanga always go missing against indians? Another failure :sanga
 
An attack of Kumar, Shami and Yadav would be good for India.
 
lol why does sanga always go missing against indians? Another failure :sanga

And it doesn't help when one of the openers gets out early. Best time to get Sanga is with the new ball and early in his innings and the indians have bowled beautifully to him.
 
Yadav bowling phaast! in the high 130s:akhtar haha just kidding, bowling well here.

This deck is hard man, didn't know India could make such pitches.
 
Look at Lanka taking full advantage of them Indian highways.

25/2, way to go champs!
 
Bhuvi has been disappointing in odi's for some time now

No,hes always been economical.Not amongst wickets but deserves more chances.Swings the ball everywhere

Also nothing suggests Dhawal is better
 
Seems like Cement business is quite big in India :srini
 
Honestly I want to travel to India (Ajmer and Barailly), but don't know if I will get Visa though I am norwegian.
 
Why are the speeds on cricinfo higher than the in-game speed gun? There is always something wrong the Indian speed guns.
 
[MENTION=45152]Saurav[/MENTION] - Do you think both Umesh and Aaron can play together for India? Or since both are similar type of bowlers only 1 should play?
 
[MENTION=45152]Saurav[/MENTION] - Do you think both Umesh and Aaron can play together for India? Or since both are similar type of bowlers only 1 should play?

Do not think they will be played together by :msd

An attacking captain could though.
 
How the heck does dilshan average 30+.
He plays & misses like 50% of the times.
Must be the luckiest guy out there.
 
Do not think they will be played together by :msd

An attacking captain could though.

Yea true. The reason I asked this because say Aaron remains unfit for WC, will he be missed by India? Or his void could be filled by Umesh?
 
[MENTION=45152]Saurav[/MENTION] - Do you think both Umesh and Aaron can play together for India? Or since both are similar type of bowlers only 1 should play?

They are not similar.Umesh looks for swing while Aaron is more hit the deck hard and break the nose kinda bowler :D

Both can play in Tests esp.Even in ODIs if they sort their accuracy issues they can play
 
Yeah. I know some friends who got it rejected.

You can try your luck, you may have it approved for all you know.

But a person of Pakistani origin makes it difficult. Even a non-commoner like Usman Khawaja ran into issues when he was in India for a CLT20 recently.
 
Yea true. The reason I asked this because say Aaron remains unfit for WC, will he be missed by India? Or his void could be filled by Umesh?

Aaron even if fit will most likely warm the bench as a backup bowler.So wont miss him much if regular bowlers continue doing well
 
Aaron even if fit will most likely warm the bench as a backup bowler.So wont miss him much if regular bowlers continue doing well

Agree. Bhuvi - Shami - Umesh - Ishant good attack in Aust
 
Agree. Bhuvi - Shami - Umesh - Ishant good attack in Aust

Yeah.only Bhuvi and Shami are certain atm.

What can swing it in Aaron's favour is if he's fit for Aus tri series and does well in death overs.We are desperately looking for a death bowler
 
Thank You Kohli. Thank You Kohli. Thank You Kohli.

For choosing and backing real fast bowlers.

Trundlers unless they have wild skills won't do anything in the long run.

Thanks you again for giving fast pacers a good chance and putting them in the radar.
 
Thank You Kohli. Thank You Kohli. Thank You Kohli.

For choosing and backing real fast bowlers.

Trundlers unless they have wild skills won't do anything in the long run.

Thanks you again for giving fast pacers a good chance and putting them in the radar.

I'd rather thank the bowlers for improved display.They havent given any reason not to get the backing :)
 
Thank You Kohli. Thank You Kohli. Thank You Kohli.

For choosing and backing real fast bowlers.

Trundlers unless they have wild skills won't do anything in the long run.

Thanks you again for giving fast pacers a good chance and putting them in the radar.
Er these are the only seamers available to him in the squad.

Even if he didn't want to back them he doesn't any other choice
 
Er these are the only seamers available to him in the squad.

Even if he didn't want to back them he doesn't any other choice

There were a few trundlers.

In the first game, he chose both Aaron and Umesh. Everyone praised Kohli for choosing them.

I'd rather thank the bowlers for improved display.They havent given any reason not to get the backing :)

Proper chance. Proper spells.

Credit where credit is due.

Dhoni in england chose Dhawal over Umesh for the third seamer.

Later on only Umesh got chance.
 
Last edited:
There were a few trundlers.

In the first game, he chose both Aaron and Umesh. Everyone praised Kohli for choosing them.



Proper chance. Proper spells.

Credit where credit is due.

Dhoni in england chose Dhawal over Umesh for the third seamer.

Later on only Umesh got chance.

Dhawal got only one game.Hes decent too and seeing Umesh's previous record it wasnt as much surprise.

Umesh played v WI too.

Backing or not comes in when bowler does badly.In that respect Kohli hasnt been good going by Asia Cup and IPL.

Still way to early to judge imo though
 
:facepalm: Just curious, do you even understand cricket?

Yes. Rayudu getting a fluke wicket is humble pie.

9 out of 10 times these things won't work.

Plus right now batsmen are getting set due to part timers.

Part timers have their role but not in this case. And Rayudu isn't evn part time.

But I expect such comments from you who simply looks at the immediate result and not the big context.

So focus on cricket bro.
 
Dhawal got only one game.Hes decent too and seeing Umesh's previous record it wasnt as much surprise.

Umesh played v WI too.

Backing or not comes in when bowler does badly.In that respect Kohli hasnt been good going by Asia Cup and IPL.

Still way to early to judge imo though

He got in before Umesh.

He screwed up so Umesh got a chance. This is what happened, didn't it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top