What's new

India's Adani Group in crisis

Adani has 100 issues but US accusation was absolutely dull, wonder if someone like Lina Khan advised this too, probably a parting gift from Biden Entourage.
Irrespective Hindenburg who I used to respect a lot now I’m wondering if there is a massive US political clout considering they couldn’t make much against Adani.
 
Adani has 100 issues but US accusation was absolutely dull, wonder if someone like Lina Khan advised this too, probably a parting gift from Biden Entourage.
Irrespective Hindenburg who I used to respect a lot now I’m wondering if there is a massive US political clout considering they couldn’t make much against Adani.

Can you elaborate?
 
Adani Group’s troubles keep growing as financial and legal headwinds get stronger

Adani Group is staring at trouble on several fronts as investors and partners rethink ties with the Indian conglomerate in the wake of bribery and fraud accusations by U.S. authorities.

Projects and investments tied to the Indian conglomerates’ businesses spanning across the world have come under the spotlight, following the U.S. indictment of its billionaire founder last Thursday.

“The US indictment is likely to constrain the group’s access to new financing in the near term, particularly in the offshore capital markets, Leonard Law, a senior credit analyst at Lucro Analytics told CNBC. The group has denied any wrongdoing.

The allegations are “more serious” than those from short-seller Hindenburg Research’s report in 2023, and the legal proceedings are likely to be protracted, he added.

Fitch Ratings has put several dollar bonds issued by Adani Group companies on its negative ratings watchlist, which means the bonds could potentially be downgraded.

The action reflects higher corporate governance risk and “potential contagion risk” that could affect access to funding and liquidity.

Following the bombshell indictment last week, which triggered a selloff in the group’s stocks, Kenyan president William Ruto scrapped airport and electricity deals worth about $2.5 billion with the group, Reuters reported.

In another blow to the conglomerate, French energy giant TotalEnergies, on Monday suspended new investments linked to Adani Group and claimed it was not informed of the investigation into the alleged corruption scheme.

“Until such time when the accusations against the Adani group individuals and their consequences have been clarified, TotalEnergies will not make any new financial contribution as part of its investments in the Adani group of companies,” the French company said.

Shares of the French oil major, which owns a 19.75% stake in Adani Green Energy and a 50% holding in joint ventures with Adani Green, fell 2.4% on Monday.

The U.S. International Development Finance Corp has also said it would review its prior agreements to lend $553 million to a Sri Lankan port development that’s backed by the Adani Group.

“DFC is aware of the recent allegations related to Adani and is actively assessing the ramifications in light of the recent DOJ announcement,” an official with the development agency said in a statement.


 
India suspends parliament again in row over U.S. action on Adani

India's lower house of parliament suspended proceedings for a second day on Wednesday after disruptions by lawmakers demanding a discussion of the U.S. indictment of billionaire Gautam Adani, while stocks of his group's companies clawed back some losses.

Last week U.S. authorities accused Adani, his nephew and executive director Sagar Adani and managing director of Adani Green (ADNA.NS), opens new tab, Vneet S. Jaain, of being part of a scheme to pay bribes of $265 million to secure Indian power supply contracts and misleading U.S. investors.

The ports-to-power conglomerate denied the charges as "baseless" and vowed to seek "all possible legal recourse".

India's opposition, especially the Congress party, accuse Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of shielding Adani and blocking investigations against him in India, accusations that have been denied.

Parliament proceedings were disrupted for the second day since the winter session began this week, with MPs shouting slogans and demanding discussion of the Adani allegations.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who has been a vocal critic of Adani, said Gautam Adani should be arrested.

"The gentleman has been indicted in the United States ... and the government is protecting him," Gandhi told reporters outside parliament.

The government has made no comment on the indictment but the ruling BJP has distanced itself from the controversy.

The BJP had no reason to defend Gautam Adani, a spokesperson said, adding that the party was not against industrialists, but rather considered them partners in nation-building efforts.

"Let him defend himself," the spokesperson, Gopal Krishna Agarwal said on Tuesday, adding that the law would take its own course in case of wrong-doing.

On Wednesday, Adani Green, the company at the center of the indictment, said Gautam Adani had been charged in the United States for alleged violations of securities law and faced potential fines but had not been charged under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

In a stock exchange filing, Adani Green said a complaint by U.S. regulator the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sought "an order directing the defendants to pay civil monetary penalties (but) it does not quantify the amount of penalty".

The civil action launched by the SEC runs in parallel to U.S. federal prosecutors' indictment against Adani and others.

STOCK REBOUND

Shares of 10 listed Adani Group firms recovered about $9 billion in market value on Wednesday, after having shed up to $34 billion since the indictments, up to Tuesday's close.

Adani Green, the hardest hit by the accusations, jumped 9%, but is still down some $8 billion in value.

The indictments are seen as the biggest setback for Gautam Adani, 62, and his conglomerate.

French oil major TotalEnergies (TTEF.PA), opens new tab, which has a 20% stake in Adani Green, has said it will not make any more investments in the group, adding that it was not informed of the U.S. bribery allegations against Gautam Adani.

Kenya has also cancelled a procurement process of more than $2 billion that had been expected to give control of its main airport to the Adani Group.

SOURCE: https://www.reuters.com/world/india...-after-row-over-adani-allegations-2024-11-27/
 
No idea about this case but through the read I learned about

US interference in Indian affairs.
Conspiracy by US government against honest Indians.
Indians hoping for Trump to come and save them.


It's like the Imran Khan thread.
 

Received no request from US: India on 'arrest warrant' for Gautam Adani​


The government on Friday said that it has received no request from US authorities about the arrest warrant issued against industrialist Gautam Adani over bribery charges. The remarks came amid reports of an indictment against Gautam Adani by the US Department of Justice.

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), in an official statement, said that the government has no role in the legal proceedings involving Adani-linked entities in the United States.

“This is a legal matter involving private firms and individuals and the US Department of Justice,” MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said during a press briefing. He added that “established procedures and legal avenues” would be followed in such cases.

For any legal action to be taken within India, including the execution of an arrest warrant, US authorities are required to notify the Ministry of Home Affairs in India. The Home Ministry can then direct relevant federal agencies to act upon the request.

The MEA spokesperson said that the government was not informed in advance about the matter and had not discussed it with their US counterparts. He said, “Any request by a foreign government for the service of a summons or arrest warrant is part of mutual legal assistance. Such requests are examined on merits. We have not received any request in this case from the US side.”

The spokesperson emphasised that the issue pertains to private entities and that the government is not legally involved in the matter at this stage.

 
India suspends parliament again in row over U.S. action on Adani

India's lower house of parliament suspended proceedings for a second day on Wednesday after disruptions by lawmakers demanding a discussion of the U.S. indictment of billionaire Gautam Adani, while stocks of his group's companies clawed back some losses.

Last week U.S. authorities accused Adani, his nephew and executive director Sagar Adani and managing director of Adani Green (ADNA.NS), opens new tab, Vneet S. Jaain, of being part of a scheme to pay bribes of $265 million to secure Indian power supply contracts and misleading U.S. investors.

The ports-to-power conglomerate denied the charges as "baseless" and vowed to seek "all possible legal recourse".

India's opposition, especially the Congress party, accuse Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of shielding Adani and blocking investigations against him in India, accusations that have been denied.

Parliament proceedings were disrupted for the second day since the winter session began this week, with MPs shouting slogans and demanding discussion of the Adani allegations.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who has been a vocal critic of Adani, said Gautam Adani should be arrested.

"The gentleman has been indicted in the United States ... and the government is protecting him," Gandhi told reporters outside parliament.

The government has made no comment on the indictment but the ruling BJP has distanced itself from the controversy.

The BJP had no reason to defend Gautam Adani, a spokesperson said, adding that the party was not against industrialists, but rather considered them partners in nation-building efforts.

"Let him defend himself," the spokesperson, Gopal Krishna Agarwal said on Tuesday, adding that the law would take its own course in case of wrong-doing.

On Wednesday, Adani Green, the company at the center of the indictment, said Gautam Adani had been charged in the United States for alleged violations of securities law and faced potential fines but had not been charged under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

In a stock exchange filing, Adani Green said a complaint by U.S. regulator the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sought "an order directing the defendants to pay civil monetary penalties (but) it does not quantify the amount of penalty".

The civil action launched by the SEC runs in parallel to U.S. federal prosecutors' indictment against Adani and others.

STOCK REBOUND

Shares of 10 listed Adani Group firms recovered about $9 billion in market value on Wednesday, after having shed up to $34 billion since the indictments, up to Tuesday's close.

Adani Green, the hardest hit by the accusations, jumped 9%, but is still down some $8 billion in value.

The indictments are seen as the biggest setback for Gautam Adani, 62, and his conglomerate.

French oil major TotalEnergies (TTEF.PA), opens new tab, which has a 20% stake in Adani Green, has said it will not make any more investments in the group, adding that it was not informed of the U.S. bribery allegations against Gautam Adani.

Kenya has also cancelled a procurement process of more than $2 billion that had been expected to give control of its main airport to the Adani Group.

SOURCE: https://www.reuters.com/world/india...-after-row-over-adani-allegations-2024-11-27/

If bribery allegation is true, the indictment is fully justified.
 
Question is how did any US agency reach the conclusion that bribes were paid?

Did US conduct an investigation inside India, on Indian government officials and collected evidence?

If yes, that's a serious violation of sovereignty of India and anyone who was involved has done a criminal offence.

Secondly, DoJ isn't anything independent.

More like Bidens one last hurray before leaving the office, heard Adani cut off power in Bangladesh in some areas ? This was bit of a payback as they know the democrat stooge Yunus is also.in for hard times moving forward.

Trump most likely will remove this bogus charge against Adani when he takes full control of the office. Nothing to see or get excited about here folks, move on, Pakistanis need to spend more time thinking about their diabolical situation they are in now rather than wasting it on non matters like this.

How do you two johnnies know anything about anything in this case?

Let it play out - these guys don't even offer Rs. 2 for your feeble defence.
 
Adani has 100 issues but US accusation was absolutely dull, wonder if someone like Lina Khan advised this too, probably a parting gift from Biden Entourage.
Irrespective Hindenburg who I used to respect a lot now I’m wondering if there is a massive US political clout considering they couldn’t make much against Adani.
Adani allegedly bribed some politicians in India, something which every Indian businessman who ever lived has done. Adani is also listed in US stock exchanges and is raising money from American investors for his legitimate businesses, both in the US and worldwide. According to these allegations, it is this money that was raised from US investors that was used to pay the bribes. This is a violation of US law. Money raised for legitimate business purposes in the US cannot be used for illegal activities like giving out bribes. This is as far as I understand. So far so good.

The question is how the US authorities were able to trace the money. Bribes in India are always given in cash, mostly from undeclared wealth, or in the form of real estate or favors. There is usually no money trail, which is why it is so difficult to prove any bribe allegation. So it may all be just the exiting Biden administration kicking up some dust, which will eventually settle down.
 
This is fantastic news! The demise of an Indian entrepreneur who built his company on bribes and corruption.

This is what a a real Indian CEO looks like, not a quid pro quo puppet.
 
Lol the British wannabe Pakistani poster whines 24 7 on Indian stuff, it’s always good to see coz the day they pity us is when we know we are having a downfall.
 
How do you two johnnies know anything about anything in this case?

Let it play out - these guys don't even offer Rs. 2 for your feeble defence.

It aint about who is right or wrong, it is an opinion you dumb as** on an open forum, last I checked anyone can express it here.
 

BJP accuses US State Department and 'deep state' of targeting India over Adani and Modi​


Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused the US State Department and "deep state" elements of attempting to destabilise India, claiming they are working alongside a group of investigative journalists and opposition leader Rahul Gandhi.

This accusation has raised eyebrows, as India and the US have built a strong relationship over the past two decades, with both countries vowing to further strengthen ties despite some ongoing differences.

The BJP's accusations come in response to the Congress party's use of reports from the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), which have focused on the Adani Group and its alleged ties to the Indian government.

The BJP claims that these reports are being used by Gandhi to undermine Modi. In particular, OCCRP's articles have spotlighted allegations that Adani Group chair Gautam Adani and others were involved in a $265 billion scheme to bribe Indian officials—a claim that the Adani Group has strongly denied.

The OCCRP has accused Indian state-sponsored hackers of using Israeli-made Pegasus spyware to target government critics, a charge the Indian government has also denied.

The BJP has previously accused Gandhi, the OCCRP, and 92-year-old billionaire financier George Soros of attacking Modi.

 
Typical Indian CEO. Never his fault, always someone elses fault.

You're a crook Adani, just like your Saffron leader Modi.
 
Will bribery charges against Adani derail India's green goals?

Bribery charges by a US court against the Adani Group are unlikely to significantly upset India's clean energy goals, industry leaders have told the BBC.

Delhi has pledged to source half of its energy needs or 500 gigawatts (GW) of electricity from renewable sources by 2032, key to global efforts to combat climate change.

The Adani Group is slated to contribute to a tenth of that capacity.

The legal troubles in the US could temporarily delay the group's expansion plans but will not affect the government's overall targets, analysts say.

India has made impressive strides in building clean energy infrastructure over the last decade.

The country is growing at the "fastest rate among major economies" in adding renewables capacity, according to the International Energy Agency.

Installed clean energy capacity has grown five-fold, with some 45% of the country's power-generation capacity - of nearly 200GW - coming from non-fossil fuel sources.

Charges against the Adani Group - crucial to India's clean energy ambitions - are "like a passing dark cloud", and will not meaningfully impact this momentum, a former CEO of a rival firm said, wanting to remain anonymous.

Gautam Adani has vowed to invest $100bn (£78.3bn) in India's energy transition. Its green energy arm is the country's largest renewable energy company, producing nearly 11GW of clean energy through a diverse portfolio of wind and solar projects.

Adani has a target to scale that to 50GW BY 2030, which will make up nearly 10% of the country's own installed capacity.

Over half of that, or 30GW, will be produced at Khavda, in the western Indian state of Gujarat. It is the world's biggest clean energy plant, touted to be five times the size of Paris and the centrepiece in Adani's renewables crown.

But Khavda and Adani's other renewables facilities are now at the very centre of the charges filed by US prosecutors - they allege that the company won contracts to supply power to state distribution companies from these facilities, in exchange for bribes to Indian officials. The group has denied this.

But the fallout at the company level is already visible.

When the indictment became public, Adani Green Energy immediately cancelled a $600m bond offering in the US.

France's TotalEnergies, which owns 20% of Adani Green Energy and has a joint venture to develop several renewables projects with the conglomerate, said it will halt fresh capital infusion into the company.

Major credit ratings agencies - Moody's, Fitch and S&P - have since changed their outlook on Adani group companies, including Adani Green Energy, to negative. This will impact the company's capacity to access funds and make it more expensive to raise capital.

Analysts have also raised concerns about Adani Green Energy's ability to refinance its debt, as international lenders grow weary of adding exposure to the group.

Global lenders like Jeffries and Barclays are already said to be reviewing their ties with Adani even as the group's reliance on global banks and international and local bond issues for long-term debt has grown from barely 14% in financial year 2016 to nearly 60% as of date, according to a note from Bernstein.

Japanese brokerage Nomura says new financing might dry up in the short term but should "gradually resume in the long term". Meanwhile, Japanese banks like MUFG, SMBC, Mizuho are likely to continue their relationship with the group.

The "reputational and sentimental impact" will fade away in a few months, as Adani is building "solid, strategic assets and creating long-term value", the unnamed CEO said.

A spokesperson for the Adani Group told the BBC that it was "committed to its 2030 targets and confident of delivering 50 GW of renewable energy capacity".

Adani stocks have recovered sharply from the lows they hit post the US court indictment.

Some analysts told the BBC that a possible slowdown in funding for Adani could in fact end up benefitting its competitors.

While Adani's financial influence has allowed it to rapidly expand in the sector, its competitors such as Tata Power, Goldman Sachs-backed ReNew Power, Greenko and state-run NTPC Ltd are also significantly ramping up manufacturing and generation capacity.

"It's not that Adani is a green energy champion. It is a big player that has walked both sides of the street, being the biggest private developer of coal plants in the world," said Tim Buckley, director at Climate Energy Finance.

A large entity, "perceived to be corrupt" possibly slowing its expansion, could mean "more money will start flowing into other green energy companies", he said.

According to Vibhuti Garg, South Asia director at Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), market fundamentals also continue to remain strong with demand for renewable energy outpacing supply in India - which is likely to keep the appetite for big investments intact.

What could in fact slow the pace of India's clean energy ambitions is its own bureaucracy.

"Companies we track are very upbeat. Finance isn't a problem for them. If anything, it is state-level regulations that act as a kind of deterrent," says Ms Garg.

Most state-run power distribution companies continue to face financial constraints, opting for cheaper fossil fuels, while dragging their feet on signing purchase agreements.

According to Reuters, the controversial tender won by Adani was the first major contract issued by state-run Solar Energy Corp of India (SECI) without a guaranteed purchase agreement from distributors.

SECI's chairman told Reuters that there are 30GW of operational green energy projects in the market without buyers.

Experts say the 8GW solar contract at the heart of Adani's US indictment also sheds light on the messy tendering process, which required solar power generation companies to manufacture modules as well - limiting the number of bidders and leading to higher power costs.

The court indictment will certainly lead to a "tightening of bidding and tendering rules", says Ms Garg.

A cleaner tendering process that lowers risks both for developers and investors will be important going ahead, agrees Mr Buckley.

BBC
 
Adani is inevitable.
He reminds me of the protagonist in the movie There Will Be Blood. The man won’t stop at nothing and will probably die the richest entrepreneur to ever live leaving behind a massive empire.
 
Well hopefully you didn’t invest and it was all talk. The stock is down even more compared to the date you made this post

Market isn’t immune to fear of the common man. When you have all these major institutional investors pulling the plugs like this, it’s only natural the retail investor will play conservative and wait till the storm passes.

Long term investor will continue to hold. Adani remains the market leader through its massive investments and expertise. The stock will rebound immediately once Adani comes out of this unharmed.
 
US-Based Short Seller Hindenburg Research, Which Targeted Adani Group, To Be Disbanded


Hindenburg Research, the US-based short seller that had targeted several business entities including the Adani Group, is going to be disbanded, founder Nate Anderson has said.

"I have made the decision to disband Hindenburg Research. The plan has been to wind up after we finished the pipeline of ideas we were working on," he said in a note on the Hindenburg website.

In an announcement that comes days before Donald Trump takes office, Anderson has also clarified there has been no particular threat or personal issue behind this decision to wind up.

Hindenburg targeted the Adani Group in 2022 with what the group said was "nothing but a lie" and were "calculated attacks on India". The Supreme Court, too, had given a clean chit to the Adani Group with analysts and experts calling out the

In August 2024, the short-seller launched another attack on the energy-to ports conglomerate, which snubbed the charges as "recycled claims" that had earlier been discarded.

Speaking peaking about the short seller hit jobs a month later, Gautam Adani, the chairman of Adani Group, had said it taught him the "most profound lesson".

"Our leadership spirit was never more visible than during the financial market attack in January last year. It was a short-selling attack initiated from abroad. This was not a typical financial strike. It was a dual assault targeting our financial stability and pulling us into a political storm. It was a calculated move," he had said.

The short seller had also targeted Indian markets regulator chief Madhavi Puri Buch and her husband in the past, who had called it an "attempt at character assassination".
----------------------------------------------------------------
Link: https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-...-targeted-adani-group-to-be-disbanded-7484076
 
RAW strikes again :msd I thought next step was going to be economics professor from Bangladesh but will take this too. Well done RAW again :)
 
Reminds me of News of The World shutting down a year or so after the spot fixing scandal.
 
Typical Indian CEO. Never his fault, always someone elses fault.

You're a crook Adani, just like your Saffron leader Modi.

Just like many of the Indian posters here. :yk

These people don't believe in self-accountability. It is always someone else's fault. :inti
 
Some hilarious posts on what Hindenburg did, no credibility whatsoever on those reports, having said that Hindenburg’s sudden closure doesn’t make any sense.
 
Waiting for Adani to claim asylum in the UK.
Lol.. seems more shrewd than we all thought.
Guess Zionists are the most powerful force in the world from Saudi to Qatar to UAE to Turkey to India and Pakistan and yes most importantly UK.. its all them.
 
US Probing Adani Group Over Suspected Iran Petrochemical Imports, WSJ Reports

The US Department of Justice is reportedly investigating whether the Adani group had imported Iranian petrochemical products from Iran, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal, even as the conglomerate negotiates a settlement in a separate foreign bribery case.

Describing the allegations as “baseless and mischievous”, an Adani Group spokesperson denied any “deliberate engagement in sanctions evasion or trade involving Iranian-origin LPG”. The Adani spokesperson also stated that it wasn’t aware of any investigation by US authorities on this subject.

“The timing of the WSJ’s story clearly betrays an intent to adversely influence the DoJ indictment against Adani,” the spokesperson added.

The Journal had previously reported on April 13 that lawyers representing Gautam Adani had asked the US Department of Justice to drop criminal charges accusing him of orchestrating over USD 250 million in bribes to secure solar energy contracts in India.

The charges, unsealed in October 2024, named Adani, his nephew Sagar Adani, and six other executives across three companies.

In a parallel civil case, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed complaints against Gautam and Sagar Adani for allegedly violating anti-fraud provisions of federal securities laws.

On May 5, Bloomberg reported that negotiations between Adani’s legal team and officials from the Trump administration had intensified and could lead to a resolution “in the coming month or so.”

The Journal’s June 2 report, citing sources, says US prosecutors are “reviewing the activities of several LPG tankers used to ship cargoes to Adani Enterprises”.

The WSJ also did an investigation tracking a group of LPG tankers travelling between Gulf ports and Adani-operated Mundra port. It said they found allegedly tell-tale signs of ships attempting to obscure their activities, which includes manipulating the ship’s automatic identification system, or AIS, which shares a ship’s position.

“Purchasers of Iranian oil and gas products often use forged documents from Oman and Iraq, according to several people familiar with the trade,” the WSJ reported.

The report focuses on a Panama-flagged tanker, SMS Bros (renamed Neel), which according to AIS data was docked in Iraq’s Khor al Zubair port on April 3. However, satellite images from the same day reportedly show no trace of the ship there. Instead, a vessel matching its profile was docked at an LPG terminal in Tonbak, Iran. Four days later, the tanker appeared off the UAE coast, with its data indicating it was riding lower in the water – suggesting it had taken on cargo.

Although the vessel broadcast an anchorage near Oman’s Sohar port, it never appeared to dock there. Two days later, Adani Global PTE contracted the ship to load approximately 11,250 metric tons of LPG at Sohar and transport it to the Mundra port. Indian customs records from April 17 show Adani Enterprises imported a cargo matching the shipment’s profile, valued just over USD 7 million.

The SMS Bros, a tanker renamed as Neel last year, has shown several discrepancies in its shipping records, with a Bangladeshi port document from June indicating a delivery of Iranian-origin LPG for an unidentified importer, even as its AIS data pointed to a journey to Iraq – similar to a pattern observed in April, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Three other LPG tankers linked to Adani’s Mundra port also show signs of obfuscation. One, operated by the same company that managed the Neel, exhibited similar spoofing behaviour and appeared on a US Senate watchlist of vessels suspected of transporting Iranian oil and gas. Another broadcast a port call in Khor al Zubair not visible in satellite imagery, while a fourth – frequently docking at Mundra – was named in a 2024 US Energy Department report for exporting Iranian petroleum

Adani Group strongly refuted the Wall Street Journal report, calling the LPG segment “operationally non-material,” accounting for just 1.46% of Adani Enterprises’ consolidated revenue of over $11.7 billion in financial year 2024–25. It maintained that all LPG trade conducted by Adani entities complies with domestic and international laws, including US sanctions regulations.

The group said it purchases LPG through contracts with reputed international suppliers, undertakes due diligence to ensure none are on the OFAC sanctions list, and uses third-party logistics firms to handle shipping in line with global compliance norms.

Responding specifically to the shipment cited in the Journal report, Adani said it was a routine commercial transaction managed by third-party logistics partners, with documentation showing Sohar, Oman, as the port of origin.

“We do not own, operate or track vessels (including the alleged SMS Bros/Neel) and cannot comment on the current or past activity of vessels we have not contracted and do not control,” the group said, adding that all responsibilities of a bona fide importer had been fulfilled.

 
US Probing Adani Group Over Suspected Iran Petrochemical Imports, WSJ Reports

The US Department of Justice is reportedly investigating whether the Adani group had imported Iranian petrochemical products from Iran, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal, even as the conglomerate negotiates a settlement in a separate foreign bribery case.

Describing the allegations as “baseless and mischievous”, an Adani Group spokesperson denied any “deliberate engagement in sanctions evasion or trade involving Iranian-origin LPG”. The Adani spokesperson also stated that it wasn’t aware of any investigation by US authorities on this subject.

“The timing of the WSJ’s story clearly betrays an intent to adversely influence the DoJ indictment against Adani,” the spokesperson added.

The Journal had previously reported on April 13 that lawyers representing Gautam Adani had asked the US Department of Justice to drop criminal charges accusing him of orchestrating over USD 250 million in bribes to secure solar energy contracts in India.

The charges, unsealed in October 2024, named Adani, his nephew Sagar Adani, and six other executives across three companies.

In a parallel civil case, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed complaints against Gautam and Sagar Adani for allegedly violating anti-fraud provisions of federal securities laws.

On May 5, Bloomberg reported that negotiations between Adani’s legal team and officials from the Trump administration had intensified and could lead to a resolution “in the coming month or so.”

The Journal’s June 2 report, citing sources, says US prosecutors are “reviewing the activities of several LPG tankers used to ship cargoes to Adani Enterprises”.

The WSJ also did an investigation tracking a group of LPG tankers travelling between Gulf ports and Adani-operated Mundra port. It said they found allegedly tell-tale signs of ships attempting to obscure their activities, which includes manipulating the ship’s automatic identification system, or AIS, which shares a ship’s position.

“Purchasers of Iranian oil and gas products often use forged documents from Oman and Iraq, according to several people familiar with the trade,” the WSJ reported.

The report focuses on a Panama-flagged tanker, SMS Bros (renamed Neel), which according to AIS data was docked in Iraq’s Khor al Zubair port on April 3. However, satellite images from the same day reportedly show no trace of the ship there. Instead, a vessel matching its profile was docked at an LPG terminal in Tonbak, Iran. Four days later, the tanker appeared off the UAE coast, with its data indicating it was riding lower in the water – suggesting it had taken on cargo.

Although the vessel broadcast an anchorage near Oman’s Sohar port, it never appeared to dock there. Two days later, Adani Global PTE contracted the ship to load approximately 11,250 metric tons of LPG at Sohar and transport it to the Mundra port. Indian customs records from April 17 show Adani Enterprises imported a cargo matching the shipment’s profile, valued just over USD 7 million.

The SMS Bros, a tanker renamed as Neel last year, has shown several discrepancies in its shipping records, with a Bangladeshi port document from June indicating a delivery of Iranian-origin LPG for an unidentified importer, even as its AIS data pointed to a journey to Iraq – similar to a pattern observed in April, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Three other LPG tankers linked to Adani’s Mundra port also show signs of obfuscation. One, operated by the same company that managed the Neel, exhibited similar spoofing behaviour and appeared on a US Senate watchlist of vessels suspected of transporting Iranian oil and gas. Another broadcast a port call in Khor al Zubair not visible in satellite imagery, while a fourth – frequently docking at Mundra – was named in a 2024 US Energy Department report for exporting Iranian petroleum

Adani Group strongly refuted the Wall Street Journal report, calling the LPG segment “operationally non-material,” accounting for just 1.46% of Adani Enterprises’ consolidated revenue of over $11.7 billion in financial year 2024–25. It maintained that all LPG trade conducted by Adani entities complies with domestic and international laws, including US sanctions regulations.

The group said it purchases LPG through contracts with reputed international suppliers, undertakes due diligence to ensure none are on the OFAC sanctions list, and uses third-party logistics firms to handle shipping in line with global compliance norms.

Responding specifically to the shipment cited in the Journal report, Adani said it was a routine commercial transaction managed by third-party logistics partners, with documentation showing Sohar, Oman, as the port of origin.

“We do not own, operate or track vessels (including the alleged SMS Bros/Neel) and cannot comment on the current or past activity of vessels we have not contracted and do not control,” the group said, adding that all responsibilities of a bona fide importer had been fulfilled.


On one hand, Indians are cheering for Israel against Iran.

On the other hand, they do business with Iran.

India is such a snake!
 
On one hand, Indians are cheering for Israel against Iran.

On the other hand, they do business with Iran.

India is such a snake!

Hats off to Indian diplomacy and its foreign policy……. That’s why few years back IK openly said in rallyhe applauds India’s foreign policy
 
On one hand, Indians are cheering for Israel against Iran.

On the other hand, they do business with Iran.

India is such a snake!

Doing business with everyone : Bharat
Begging from everyone: Pakistan
Cringed by everyone: Bangladesh

hehe
 

Looks like Adani is getting money now
 
India regulator rejects US firm's fraud claims against Adani Group

India's stock market regular has dismissed some allegations of stock manipulation and financial fraud against billionaire Gautam Adani and his group of companies, made by US short-seller Hindenburg Research.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) began investigating the conglomerate in 2023, after Hindenburg Research published explosive reports, causing the group a loss of more than $100bn in market value in days.

On Thursday, Sebi dismissed the allegations against Adani's companies, saying the inquiry did not reveal any violation of regulatory norms.

"Sebi has reaffirmed what we have always maintained, that the Hindenburg claims were baseless," Mr Adani posted on X.

On 24 January 2023, Hindenburg Research, which specialises in "short-selling" - betting against a company's share price in the expectation that it will fall - publised a 106-page report accusing the Adani Group of accounting irregularities, stock manipulation and of using offshore shell companies to inflate share prices.

Sebi dismissed some of these allegations on Thursday saying that according to its rules, there were no transactions between Adani's companies and related-parties and hence, did not need to be disclosed to investors nor did they consitute market manipulation.

It also said that there were no allegations of money being siphoned off or funds being diverted or investors losing money. It added that loans taken by Adani companies from any entity had been paid back even before the start of the investigation.

"On merit too, it is held that impugned transactions cannot be classified as manipulative or fraudulent transactions or unfair trade practices," the order notes.

Sebi has cleared two charges against Adani firms, but 22 cases on issues from insider trading to public float violations remain pending, according to Reuters news agency.

Hindeburg's allegations had sparked furious political rows in the country, with India's main opposition Congress party accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of not taking action against the Adani group.

Mr Adani, who is one of Asia's richest men, is perceived as being close to Mr Modi and has long faced allegations from opposition politicians that he has benefited from his political ties, which he denies.

Last year, the short-seller also accused former Sebi chief Madhabi Puri Buch of having links with offshore funds used by the Adani group.

In May, India's anti-corruption watchdog cleared her of all corruption charges levelled against her on the basis of Hindenburg's allegations.

Earlier this year, Nate Anderson, the founder of Hindenburg Research, announced that he was disbanding the company almost eight years after starting it.

Mr Anderson didn't share a specific reason for his decision, but expressed a desire to spend more time with friends and family in the future.

BBC
 
India’s $3.9 billion plan to help Modi’s mogul ally after U.S. charges

Debt was piling up quickly this spring for Gautam Adani — owner of a vast empire of Indian coal mines, airports, seaports and green energy ventures — and the bills were coming due.

India’s second richest man, whose net worth hovers around $90 billion, had been charged with bribery and fraud last year by U.S. authorities, and several major American and European banks he had looked to for loans were hesitant to help.

But the Indian government was crafting its own aid plan.

Internal documents obtained exclusively by The Washington Post detail how Indian officials drafted and pushed through a proposal in May to steer roughly $3.9 billion in investments to Adani’s businesses from the Life Insurance Corporation of India, or LIC — a state-owned entity primarily responsible for providing life insurance to poor and rural families.

The plan came to fruition the same month that Adani’s ports subsidiary needed to raise roughly $585 million in a bond issue to refinance existing debt. On May 30, Adani Group announced that the whole bond had been financed by a single investor — LIC — in a deal immediately decried by critics as a misuse of public funds.

The documents and interviews show it was just one piece of a larger plan by Indian authorities to direct taxpayer money to a conglomerate owned by one of the country’s most prominent and politically well-connected billionaires. It is a vivid illustration of Adani’s clout within the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, his longtime ally, and of how officials in New Delhi have come to see his business empire as central to the country’s economic fortunes.

“This government supports Adani and will not allow any harm or any detriment to come to it,” said Hemindra Hazari, a Mumbai-based independent expert on Indian corporate finance.

This investigation is based on documents from LIC and the Indian Department of Financial Services (DFS), a branch of the country’s Finance Ministry, interviews with current and former officials at those agencies, as well as three Indian bankers familiar with Adani Group finances. All spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of professional retribution.

“We categorically deny involvement in any alleged government plans to direct LIC funds,” Adani Group said in response to questions from The Washington Post. “LIC invests across multiple corporate groups — and suggesting preferential treatment for Adani is misleading. Moreover, LIC has earned returns from its exposure to our portfolio.”

The company said that “assertions of undue political favour are unfounded” and “our growth predates Mr Modi’s national leadership.”

LIC, DFS and Modi’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

The investment plan was crafted by officials at DFS in coordination with LIC and India’s main government-funded think tank, NITI Aayog, the documents show, and approved by the Finance Ministry, according to two officials familiar with the matter. NITI Aayog did not respond to requests for comment.

Among the plan’s “strategic objectives,” according to DFS documents, were “signaling confidence in Adani group” and “encouraging participation from other investors” — at a time when the conglomerate had seen its overall debt rise by 20 percent over the last 12 months ending in June, according to company filings for the 2025 and 2026 fiscal years.

Months earlier, Adani had been charged by the U.S. Department of Justice with allegedly perpetrating a “multi-billion-dollar scheme” to get funds from U.S. investors based on false and misleading information. In a separate civil case announced the same day, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged the billionaire with violating securities law.

The U.S. legal proceedings “concern individuals, not Adani companies,” Adani Group said in its statement, adding that “we have categorically denied these allegations.”

In the DFS documents, Adani was hailed as a “visionary entrepreneur” whose company has shown “remarkable resilience in the face of significant challenges.” And those challenges extend beyond the United States.

A 2023 report by Hindenburg, a now-defunct investment research firm, accused Adani Group of stock manipulation and financial irregularities — leading the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the country’s stock market regulator, to launch an investigation. SEBI dismissed two of the allegations in September, but others are still pending, according to a source familiar with the investigation and a report last month from Reuters.

“SEBI has already concluded investigations into related-party transactions and found no violations at Adani Ports, Adani Power or Adani Enterprises,” Adani Group said in its statement. “Assertions that probes remain ‘open’ misrepresent SEBI’s orders.”

SEBI did not respond to a request for comment.

LIC, which had purchased stakes in several Adani companies before the scandals, was advised by Indian Finance Ministry officials to invest roughly $3.4 billion in corporate bonds issued by Adani Group and use an additional estimated $507 million to significantly increase its stakes in several subsidiaries, the documents show. Ten-year government bonds offered “limited upside” compared with those issued by Adani’s conglomerate, Finance Ministry officials wrote in their analysis of the investment plan.

Four months after the port bond, it is unclear which, if any, of the additional recommended investments have been made by LIC.

Tim Buckley, director of the Australian think tank Climate Energy Finance and an expert on Adani’s corporate finances, said India’s backing of the billionaire shows that he is allowed to operate by a “different set of rules.”

An empire under strain

Adani’s empire has humble beginnings. In 1991, he was working with Cargill, helping the Minnesota-based food and agricultural company develop salt mines in the western state of Gujarat when its deal with the state government collapsed. Adani transformed the roughly 2,000 acres of abandoned desert into a deepwater port in the town of Mundra, which quickly became an infrastructural backbone for India at a moment of economic liberalization and expansion.

Full read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...=wp_main&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
 

As Major Foreign Banks Hesitated, Modi Govt Oversaw Plan to Steer Billions from LIC to Adani: Report​


A Washington Post investigation details how the Modi government quietly devised a $3.9 billion plan to rescue Gautam Adani’s debt-laden conglomerate by directing money from the state-owned Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC).

Internal documents accessed by the Post show that in May 2025, the Union finance ministry, its Department of Financial Services (DFS), LIC, and the policy think tank NITI Aayog coordinated an investment strategy that funnelled billions into Adani Group bonds and equity. The plan involved a $585-million bond issue for Adani Ports that LIC financed alone.

“The plan came to fruition the same month that Adani’s ports subsidiary needed to raise roughly $585 million in a bond issue to refinance existing debt. On May 30, Adani Group announced that the whole bond had been financed by a single investor — LIC — in a deal immediately decried by critics as a misuse of public funds,” the report notes.

The proposal’s stated goals included “signaling confidence” in Adani and attracting other investors, despite the conglomerate’s 20% debt increase over the previous year and the ongoing US corruption and fraud charges. The US Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission have charged Adani and his associates of a multibillion-dollar bribery and fraud scheme involving false statements and $250 million in illegal payments to win energy contracts. Adani has denied wrongdoing, calling the charges “baseless.” This October, the SEC said that Indian authorities have failed to act on its requests to serve summons and complaints to Adani Group executives.

The report also notes that the 2023 report by the US short-seller Hindenburg accused the Adani Group of stock manipulation and financial irregularities. An investigation by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), dismissed two of the allegations in September, this year. While Hindenburg has since shut shop, the fallout was palpable in other ways. The Post report says that several major American and European banks that Adani had looked to for loans were hesitant to help under these circumstances.

Along came Indian officials who in the DFS documents accessed by the Post described Adani as a “visionary entrepreneur,” viewing his businesses spanning ports, energy, and infrastructure as vital to national economic goals. Analysts whom the reporters of the Post spoke to warned that LIC, which insures millions of Indians – many of them low income – faces high risk by investing heavily in a politically connected private group already under global scrutiny.

Hemindra Hazari, an independent analyst quoted in the report said that it seemed “abnormal” for LIC to invest such large sums of money in a private corporate entity. “If anything happens to LIC … it’s only the government that can bail it out,” he added.

Modi’s close ties to Adani, have been at the heart of charges from many quarters, including Opposition leaders and members of civil society. The Adani group has termed such charges as a ‘conspiracy against India.’

According to the Washington Post, observers see the bailout as evidence of India’s deepening corporate-state nexus, where Adani’s fortunes mirror the government’s economic ambitions and taxpayers ultimately bear the financial risk of sustaining one of Modi’s most powerful allies.

In a series of tweets on Friday, Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra tore into the Modi government and the conglomerate. “All patriots out there & all media houses – how about some attention & coverage on how ₹30,000 crores of Indian tax payer money used as Adani’s piggybank courtesy @FinMinIndia? … “Modi government keeps funding @gautam_adani & the Indian people have to keep bailing him out.”

Early on October 25, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh also posted on X about the revelations.

“The costs of throwing public money at crony firms became clear when LIC suffered a staggering $7,850 crore loss in just four hours of trading on 21 September 2024, following the indictment of Gautam Adani and seven of his associates in the United States. Adani has been accused of orchestrating a Z2,000 crore bribery scheme to secure high-priced solar power contracts in India. The Modi government has refused, for nearly a year, to serve a US SEC summons to the Prime Minister’s most favoured business conglomerate,” Ramesh said.

He added that the alleged “Modani MegaScam” includes misuse of agencies to coerce asset sales, rigged privatisations, inflated coal imports, and politically motivated contracts.

In the afternoon of October 25, LIC released a statement saying that the allegations levelled by the Washington Post “that the investment decisions of LIC are influenced by external factors are false, baseless, and far from the truth.”

“No such document or plan as alleged in the article has ever been prepared by LIC, which creates a roadmap for infusing funds by LIC into Adani group of companies. The investment decisions are taken by LIC independently as per Board approved policies after detailed due diligence,” LIC said, claiming that the DFS or any other body does not have any role in such decisions.

“LIC has ensured highest standards of due diligence and all its investment decisions have been undertaken in compliance with extant policies, provisions in the Acts and regulatory guidelines, in the best interest of all its stakeholders. These purported statements in the article appear to have been made with the intentions to prejudice the well settled decision-making process of LIC and also to tarnish the reputation and image of LIC and the strong financial sector foundations in India,” it said.

Meanwhile, in a statement to the newspaper, the Adani Group “categorically denied” any role in the government’s decision, calling suggestions of political favoritism “unfounded” and insisting its rise “predates Modi’s national leadership”.

The report notes at the end that Ravi Nair, the independent investigative journalist who co-wrote the piece, was slapped with a defamation suit by the Adani Group in September this year over a piece he co-wrote for Frontline magazine, as well as online interviews and social media posts where he discussed his reporting for the Guardian.
India’s $3.9 billion plan to help Modi’s mogul ally after U.S. charges

Debt was piling up quickly this spring for Gautam Adani — owner of a vast empire of Indian coal mines, airports, seaports and green energy ventures — and the bills were coming due.

India’s second richest man, whose net worth hovers around $90 billion, had been charged with bribery and fraud last year by U.S. authorities, and several major American and European banks he had looked to for loans were hesitant to help.


Get concise answers to your questions. Try Ask The Post AI.
But the Indian government was crafting its own aid plan.

Internal documents obtained exclusively by The Washington Post detail how Indian officials drafted and pushed through a proposal in May to steer roughly $3.9 billion in investments to Adani’s businesses from the Life Insurance Corporation of India, or LIC — a state-owned entity primarily responsible for providing life insurance to poor and rural families.


The plan came to fruition the same month that Adani’s ports subsidiary needed to raise roughly $585 million in a bond issue to refinance existing debt. On May 30, Adani Group announced that the whole bond had been financed by a single investor — LIC — in a deal immediately decried by critics as a misuse of public funds.

🌎
Follow World news

Follow
The documents and interviews show it was just one piece of a larger plan by Indian authorities to direct taxpayer money to a conglomerate owned by one of the country’s most prominent and politically well-connected billionaires. It is a vivid illustration of Adani’s clout within the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, his longtime ally, and of how officials in New Delhi have come to see his business empire as central to the country’s economic fortunes.

“This government supports Adani and will not allow any harm or any detriment to come to it,” said Hemindra Hazari, a Mumbai-based independent expert on Indian corporate finance.


Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, left, greets Gautam Adani during the opening of the Navi Mumbai International Airport on Oct. 8. (Rafiq Maqbool/AP)
This investigation is based on documents from LIC and the Indian Department of Financial Services (DFS), a branch of the country’s Finance Ministry, interviews with current and former officials at those agencies, as well as three Indian bankers familiar with Adani Group finances. All spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of professional retribution.


“We categorically deny involvement in any alleged government plans to direct LIC funds,” Adani Group said in response to questions from The Washington Post. “LIC invests across multiple corporate groups — and suggesting preferential treatment for Adani is misleading. Moreover, LIC has earned returns from its exposure to our portfolio.”

The company said that “assertions of undue political favour are unfounded” and “our growth predates Mr Modi’s national leadership.”

LIC, DFS and Modi’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

The investment plan was crafted by officials at DFS in coordination with LIC and India’s main government-funded think tank, NITI Aayog, the documents show, and approved by the Finance Ministry, according to two officials familiar with the matter. NITI Aayog did not respond to requests for comment.


Among the plan’s “strategic objectives,” according to DFS documents, were “signaling confidence in Adani group” and “encouraging participation from other investors” — at a time when the conglomerate had seen its overall debt rise by 20 percent over the last 12 months ending in June, according to company filings for the 2025 and 2026 fiscal years.

Months earlier, Adani had been charged by the U.S. Department of Justice with allegedly perpetrating a “multi-billion-dollar scheme” to get funds from U.S. investors based on false and misleading information. In a separate civil case announced the same day, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged the billionaire with violating securities law.

The U.S. legal proceedings “concern individuals, not Adani companies,” Adani Group said in its statement, adding that “we have categorically denied these allegations.”


National Students’ Union of India activists demonstrate against Adani on Nov. 21 in New Delhi. (Arun Sankar/AFP/Getty Images)
In the DFS documents, Adani was hailed as a “visionary entrepreneur” whose company has shown “remarkable resilience in the face of significant challenges.” And those challenges extend beyond the United States.


A 2023 report by Hindenburg, a now-defunct investment research firm, accused Adani Group of stock manipulation and financial irregularities — leading the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the country’s stock market regulator, to launch an investigation. SEBI dismissed two of the allegations in September, but others are still pending, according to a source familiar with the investigation and a report last month from Reuters.

“SEBI has already concluded investigations into related-party transactions and found no violations at Adani Ports, Adani Power or Adani Enterprises,” Adani Group said in its statement. “Assertions that probes remain ‘open’ misrepresent SEBI’s orders.”

SEBI did not respond to a request for comment.


LIC, which had purchased stakes in several Adani companies before the scandals, was advised by Indian Finance Ministry officials to invest roughly $3.4 billion in corporate bonds issued by Adani Group and use an additional estimated $507 million to significantly increase its stakes in several subsidiaries, the documents show. Ten-year government bonds offered “limited upside” compared with those issued by Adani’s conglomerate, Finance Ministry officials wrote in their analysis of the investment plan.

Four months after the port bond, it is unclear which, if any, of the additional recommended investments have been made by LIC.

Tim Buckley, director of the Australian think tank Climate Energy Finance and an expert on Adani’s corporate finances, said India’s backing of the billionaire shows that he is allowed to operate by a “different set of rules.”

An empire under strain
Adani’s empire has humble beginnings. In 1991, he was working with Cargill, helping the Minnesota-based food and agricultural company develop salt mines in the western state of Gujarat when its deal with the state government collapsed. Adani transformed the roughly 2,000 acres of abandoned desert into a deepwater port in the town of Mundra, which quickly became an infrastructural backbone for India at a moment of economic liberalization and expansion.

Full read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...=wp_main&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
 

As Major Foreign Banks Hesitated, Modi Govt Oversaw Plan to Steer Billions from LIC to Adani: Report​


A Washington Post investigation details how the Modi government quietly devised a $3.9 billion plan to rescue Gautam Adani’s debt-laden conglomerate by directing money from the state-owned Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC).

Internal documents accessed by the Post show that in May 2025, the Union finance ministry, its Department of Financial Services (DFS), LIC, and the policy think tank NITI Aayog coordinated an investment strategy that funnelled billions into Adani Group bonds and equity. The plan involved a $585-million bond issue for Adani Ports that LIC financed alone.

“The plan came to fruition the same month that Adani’s ports subsidiary needed to raise roughly $585 million in a bond issue to refinance existing debt. On May 30, Adani Group announced that the whole bond had been financed by a single investor — LIC — in a deal immediately decried by critics as a misuse of public funds,” the report notes.

The proposal’s stated goals included “signaling confidence” in Adani and attracting other investors, despite the conglomerate’s 20% debt increase over the previous year and the ongoing US corruption and fraud charges. The US Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission have charged Adani and his associates of a multibillion-dollar bribery and fraud scheme involving false statements and $250 million in illegal payments to win energy contracts. Adani has denied wrongdoing, calling the charges “baseless.” This October, the SEC said that Indian authorities have failed to act on its requests to serve summons and complaints to Adani Group executives.

The report also notes that the 2023 report by the US short-seller Hindenburg accused the Adani Group of stock manipulation and financial irregularities. An investigation by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), dismissed two of the allegations in September, this year. While Hindenburg has since shut shop, the fallout was palpable in other ways. The Post report says that several major American and European banks that Adani had looked to for loans were hesitant to help under these circumstances.

Along came Indian officials who in the DFS documents accessed by the Post described Adani as a “visionary entrepreneur,” viewing his businesses spanning ports, energy, and infrastructure as vital to national economic goals. Analysts whom the reporters of the Post spoke to warned that LIC, which insures millions of Indians – many of them low income – faces high risk by investing heavily in a politically connected private group already under global scrutiny.

Hemindra Hazari, an independent analyst quoted in the report said that it seemed “abnormal” for LIC to invest such large sums of money in a private corporate entity. “If anything happens to LIC … it’s only the government that can bail it out,” he added.

Modi’s close ties to Adani, have been at the heart of charges from many quarters, including Opposition leaders and members of civil society. The Adani group has termed such charges as a ‘conspiracy against India.’

According to the Washington Post, observers see the bailout as evidence of India’s deepening corporate-state nexus, where Adani’s fortunes mirror the government’s economic ambitions and taxpayers ultimately bear the financial risk of sustaining one of Modi’s most powerful allies.

In a series of tweets on Friday, Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra tore into the Modi government and the conglomerate. “All patriots out there & all media houses – how about some attention & coverage on how ₹30,000 crores of Indian tax payer money used as Adani’s piggybank courtesy @FinMinIndia? … “Modi government keeps funding @gautam_adani & the Indian people have to keep bailing him out.”

Early on October 25, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh also posted on X about the revelations.

“The costs of throwing public money at crony firms became clear when LIC suffered a staggering $7,850 crore loss in just four hours of trading on 21 September 2024, following the indictment of Gautam Adani and seven of his associates in the United States. Adani has been accused of orchestrating a Z2,000 crore bribery scheme to secure high-priced solar power contracts in India. The Modi government has refused, for nearly a year, to serve a US SEC summons to the Prime Minister’s most favoured business conglomerate,” Ramesh said.

He added that the alleged “Modani MegaScam” includes misuse of agencies to coerce asset sales, rigged privatisations, inflated coal imports, and politically motivated contracts.

In the afternoon of October 25, LIC released a statement saying that the allegations levelled by the Washington Post “that the investment decisions of LIC are influenced by external factors are false, baseless, and far from the truth.”

“No such document or plan as alleged in the article has ever been prepared by LIC, which creates a roadmap for infusing funds by LIC into Adani group of companies. The investment decisions are taken by LIC independently as per Board approved policies after detailed due diligence,” LIC said, claiming that the DFS or any other body does not have any role in such decisions.

“LIC has ensured highest standards of due diligence and all its investment decisions have been undertaken in compliance with extant policies, provisions in the Acts and regulatory guidelines, in the best interest of all its stakeholders. These purported statements in the article appear to have been made with the intentions to prejudice the well settled decision-making process of LIC and also to tarnish the reputation and image of LIC and the strong financial sector foundations in India,” it said.

Meanwhile, in a statement to the newspaper, the Adani Group “categorically denied” any role in the government’s decision, calling suggestions of political favoritism “unfounded” and insisting its rise “predates Modi’s national leadership”.

The report notes at the end that Ravi Nair, the independent investigative journalist who co-wrote the piece, was slapped with a defamation suit by the Adani Group in September this year over a piece he co-wrote for Frontline magazine, as well as online interviews and social media posts where he discussed his reporting for the Guardian.
And we are told Modi isnt corrupt. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
And we are told Modi isnt corrupt. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

As Major Foreign Banks Hesitated, Modi Govt Oversaw Plan to Steer Billions from LIC to Adani: Report​


A Washington Post investigation details how the Modi government quietly devised a $3.9 billion plan to rescue Gautam Adani’s debt-laden conglomerate by directing money from the state-owned Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC).

Internal documents accessed by the Post show that in May 2025, the Union finance ministry, its Department of Financial Services (DFS), LIC, and the policy think tank NITI Aayog coordinated an investment strategy that funnelled billions into Adani Group bonds and equity. The plan involved a $585-million bond issue for Adani Ports that LIC financed alone.

“The plan came to fruition the same month that Adani’s ports subsidiary needed to raise roughly $585 million in a bond issue to refinance existing debt. On May 30, Adani Group announced that the whole bond had been financed by a single investor — LIC — in a deal immediately decried by critics as a misuse of public funds,” the report notes.

The proposal’s stated goals included “signaling confidence” in Adani and attracting other investors, despite the conglomerate’s 20% debt increase over the previous year and the ongoing US corruption and fraud charges. The US Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission have charged Adani and his associates of a multibillion-dollar bribery and fraud scheme involving false statements and $250 million in illegal payments to win energy contracts. Adani has denied wrongdoing, calling the charges “baseless.” This October, the SEC said that Indian authorities have failed to act on its requests to serve summons and complaints to Adani Group executives.

The report also notes that the 2023 report by the US short-seller Hindenburg accused the Adani Group of stock manipulation and financial irregularities. An investigation by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), dismissed two of the allegations in September, this year. While Hindenburg has since shut shop, the fallout was palpable in other ways. The Post report says that several major American and European banks that Adani had looked to for loans were hesitant to help under these circumstances.

Along came Indian officials who in the DFS documents accessed by the Post described Adani as a “visionary entrepreneur,” viewing his businesses spanning ports, energy, and infrastructure as vital to national economic goals. Analysts whom the reporters of the Post spoke to warned that LIC, which insures millions of Indians – many of them low income – faces high risk by investing heavily in a politically connected private group already under global scrutiny.

Hemindra Hazari, an independent analyst quoted in the report said that it seemed “abnormal” for LIC to invest such large sums of money in a private corporate entity. “If anything happens to LIC … it’s only the government that can bail it out,” he added.

Modi’s close ties to Adani, have been at the heart of charges from many quarters, including Opposition leaders and members of civil society. The Adani group has termed such charges as a ‘conspiracy against India.’

According to the Washington Post, observers see the bailout as evidence of India’s deepening corporate-state nexus, where Adani’s fortunes mirror the government’s economic ambitions and taxpayers ultimately bear the financial risk of sustaining one of Modi’s most powerful allies.

In a series of tweets on Friday, Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra tore into the Modi government and the conglomerate. “All patriots out there & all media houses – how about some attention & coverage on how ₹30,000 crores of Indian tax payer money used as Adani’s piggybank courtesy @FinMinIndia? … “Modi government keeps funding @gautam_adani & the Indian people have to keep bailing him out.”

Early on October 25, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh also posted on X about the revelations.

“The costs of throwing public money at crony firms became clear when LIC suffered a staggering $7,850 crore loss in just four hours of trading on 21 September 2024, following the indictment of Gautam Adani and seven of his associates in the United States. Adani has been accused of orchestrating a Z2,000 crore bribery scheme to secure high-priced solar power contracts in India. The Modi government has refused, for nearly a year, to serve a US SEC summons to the Prime Minister’s most favoured business conglomerate,” Ramesh said.

He added that the alleged “Modani MegaScam” includes misuse of agencies to coerce asset sales, rigged privatisations, inflated coal imports, and politically motivated contracts.

In the afternoon of October 25, LIC released a statement saying that the allegations levelled by the Washington Post “that the investment decisions of LIC are influenced by external factors are false, baseless, and far from the truth.”

“No such document or plan as alleged in the article has ever been prepared by LIC, which creates a roadmap for infusing funds by LIC into Adani group of companies. The investment decisions are taken by LIC independently as per Board approved policies after detailed due diligence,” LIC said, claiming that the DFS or any other body does not have any role in such decisions.

“LIC has ensured highest standards of due diligence and all its investment decisions have been undertaken in compliance with extant policies, provisions in the Acts and regulatory guidelines, in the best interest of all its stakeholders. These purported statements in the article appear to have been made with the intentions to prejudice the well settled decision-making process of LIC and also to tarnish the reputation and image of LIC and the strong financial sector foundations in India,” it said.

Meanwhile, in a statement to the newspaper, the Adani Group “categorically denied” any role in the government’s decision, calling suggestions of political favoritism “unfounded” and insisting its rise “predates Modi’s national leadership”.

The report notes at the end that Ravi Nair, the independent investigative journalist who co-wrote the piece, was slapped with a defamation suit by the Adani Group in September this year over a piece he co-wrote for Frontline magazine, as well as online interviews and social media posts where he discussed his reporting for the Guardian.
The so-called “investigation” into LIC and Adani is written by Ravi Nair, a so-called journalist who refused to share proof with SEBI during the Hindenburg case but now pretends to be honest and transparent when it’s time to target Indian organizations.

LIC’s total Adani exposure is less than one percent of its Rs 41 lakh crore portfolio. Every rupee is earning returns, zero default, zero breach, zero loss. These are AAA and AA-rated bonds and dividend-paying stocks, not back-door bailouts.

LIC didn’t “save” Adani; it has made massive money over Rs 66000 crore to date. But when India’s largest insurer invests in Indian infrastructure, Western media cries foul. If the same money went into Tata or Mahindra, they’d call it “responsible investing.”

Ravi Nair is not exposing corruption, he seems to be running a foreign narrative campaign. The same man was silent when LIC was forced under UPA to prop up loss-making PSUs, but now that it’s earning profits from ports, cement, and power, he smells scandal. Every “exclusive” he drops magically lands before elections or trade negotiations. This is another hit-work designed to rattle investors and drag down Indian valuations for foreign vultures waiting to buy cheap.

Adani repaid $3 billion of debt, raised funds from GQG and BlackRock, and stayed profitable throughout. LIC has stayed within every IRDAI limit, followed every rule, and acted like a responsible institutional investor.

The only thing broken here is the credibility of The Washington Post, which gave a platform to Ravi Nair to run propaganda for yet another hit job.

:klopp :kp
 
If an Indian newspaper had broken the story, wrong or right , it would be part of the play of domestic politics.

But this is a US newspaper breaking a story about the so-called Adani- Modi axis , which has been earlier played up by a US based entity and by the Congress party in a bid to rock the BJP government by raising a controversy involving Modi.

There is clearly a conspiracy to keep the political pot boiling in India in which US interests are involved.

WP and other western media operate in India with a sense of impunity.

Some tightening up is required as a warning against interfering in domestic politics with a malign intent.

A Day ago Britain owne BBC news posting a article was there was no Protests in india to topple the goverment

INDIAN SHOULD NEVER TRUST THESES SO CALLED INTERNATIONAL NEWS AGENCIES WHO RUN THE PROPAGANDA AGAINST INDIA.

:klopp :kp
 
The so-called “investigation” into LIC and Adani is written by Ravi Nair, a so-called journalist who refused to share proof with SEBI during the Hindenburg case but now pretends to be honest and transparent when it’s time to target Indian organizations.

LIC’s total Adani exposure is less than one percent of its Rs 41 lakh crore portfolio. Every rupee is earning returns, zero default, zero breach, zero loss. These are AAA and AA-rated bonds and dividend-paying stocks, not back-door bailouts.

LIC didn’t “save” Adani; it has made massive money over Rs 66000 crore to date. But when India’s largest insurer invests in Indian infrastructure, Western media cries foul. If the same money went into Tata or Mahindra, they’d call it “responsible investing.”

Ravi Nair is not exposing corruption, he seems to be running a foreign narrative campaign. The same man was silent when LIC was forced under UPA to prop up loss-making PSUs, but now that it’s earning profits from ports, cement, and power, he smells scandal. Every “exclusive” he drops magically lands before elections or trade negotiations. This is another hit-work designed to rattle investors and drag down Indian valuations for foreign vultures waiting to buy cheap.

Adani repaid $3 billion of debt, raised funds from GQG and BlackRock, and stayed profitable throughout. LIC has stayed within every IRDAI limit, followed every rule, and acted like a responsible institutional investor.

The only thing broken here is the credibility of The Washington Post, which gave a platform to Ravi Nair to run propaganda for yet another hit job.

:klopp :kp
So you attack the Journalist for revealing the massive corruption by Modi. So its not a problem that corruptionby funneling public money to benefit a private ally and abuse of power by using government influence to override due process and protect a politically connected businessman. You aint a supporter, you are a cultist. We have the same in PK, where i scare the crap out of losers that dont see a theft from the poor as problem
 
So you attack the Journalist for revealing the massive corruption by Modi. So its not a problem that corruptionby funneling public money to benefit a private ally and abuse of power by using government influence to override due process and protect a politically connected businessman. You aint a supporter, you are a cultist. We have the same in PK, where i scare the crap out of losers that dont see a theft from the poor as problem
LIC’s investments are guided by rigorous regulatory frameworks and a disciplined portfolio strategy, not political directives.

The Washington Post’s allegation of direct payments to Adani’s businesses is unfounded 🤡🤡.

Simple logic, LIC acquires shares primarily from retail and institutional investors in the secondary market, with payments directed to those sellers, not Adani entities. Direct investments in Adani would require participation in IPOs or follow-on offerings, which is not the case here. The article contains misleading assertions and lacks journalistic integrity

:kp
 
LIC’s investments are guided by rigorous regulatory frameworks and a disciplined portfolio strategy, not political directives.

The Washington Post’s allegation of direct payments to Adani’s businesses is unfounded 🤡🤡.

Simple logic, LIC acquires shares primarily from retail and institutional investors in the secondary market, with payments directed to those sellers, not Adani entities. Direct investments in Adani would require participation in IPOs or follow-on offerings, which is not the case here. The article contains misleading assertions and lacks journalistic integrity

:kp
Who approved the investment and at what level? Did Modi’s Minister have any say? You know the answer and unless we see the Washington Post sued in court, we know Modi is corrupt. The guy is as Corrupt as the day is long.
 
LIC’s investments are guided by rigorous regulatory frameworks and a disciplined portfolio strategy, not political directives.

The Washington Post’s allegation of direct payments to Adani’s businesses is unfounded 🤡🤡.

Simple logic, LIC acquires shares primarily from retail and institutional investors in the secondary market, with payments directed to those sellers, not Adani entities. Direct investments in Adani would require participation in IPOs or follow-on offerings, which is not the case here. The article contains misleading assertions and lacks journalistic integrity

:kp
How stupid do you think everyone is?

Been saying it here for ages. India is under the control of the Gujrati overlords, who are Modi's masters. The US knows whose button to press.
 
Back
Top