360 CRICKET
Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2022
- Runs
- 53
Explain, how will IPL survive without International Cricket?
Haven't you heard that Bilaterals will soon die ??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Explain, how will IPL survive without International Cricket?
Looks like we are going to have for the first time ever two different rights holder for TV and digital.
Cumulative total USD 5.6xx billion for five years.
Let's see how much the ICC can fetch for its own global events rights.
There's also the India international rights to be sold by the year end.
The ICC could have a problem here. They have separated the subcontinent rights as bidding package on its own. What if Disney, Sony, et all only bid for subcontinent rights? Where/whom are they going to sell the rest of the rights.
Sky,Ch9, Fox and co usually are not interested and have never bid of ICC tournaments.
Explain, how will IPL survive without International Cricket? Football can survive without Internationals. There are too many countries who play football and there are so many leagues which run for almost an year. Comparing a joke league like IPL which has no loyal fanbase, no exclusive contracts for players is an insult to real sports league system. Which country play their league on foreign soil?
And England isn't the only team which has a football league, there are other leagues which are on the same level with EPL, so competition is a bit tough especially when you have 32 teams in a World Cup.
Do some 360 degree research regarding football first and then quote me back.![]()
Broadcast rights
NFL is at 20 billion $
EPL is at 7 billion $
IPL is at 6 billion $
No of games played in IPL << EPL/ NFL
I question how the ICC will allow a situation where a domestic league is making more money than the ICC. ICC will need to renegotiate with the Broadcasters for a better deal for its global tournaments.
Does the Indian tax payer benefit from this circus?
I question how the ICC will allow a situation where a domestic league is making more money than the ICC. ICC will need to renegotiate with the Broadcasters for a better deal for its global tournaments.
How does TV channels have so much money?
Who gets the biggest cut from the deal? I know players are paid chunks compared to overall revenue.
How does this affect a local taxi or rickshaw driver?
Why can't everyone open up their own sports channel?
Mega auction has already happened so shouldn't players demand existing contract hike now that franchises gonna earn more.
But what about current contracts. If they increase purse who will get benefit for 2023 season when mega auction is already done in 2022 ? Shouldn't current contracts renegotiated?Expect atleast one more mega auction in 2025 and that may be the final one.
But what about current contracts. If they increase purse who will get benefit for 2023 season when mega auction is already done in 2022 ? Shouldn't current contracts renegotiated?
The broadcasters and other stakeholders are willing to shell out the money. Can they recoup all this money?
The broadcasters and other stakeholders are willing to shell out the money. Can they recoup all this money?
"The BCCI will utilize the revenue generated from IPL to strengthen our domestic cricket structure starting from grassroots, to boost infrastructure and spruce up facilities across India and enrich the overall cricket-watching experience."
Result - We best Australia twice in Australia which no subcontinent team ever did, one of those win was against a full strength Australian team(or almost a full strength) and Indian team that showed up was 'C' team. All hail Test cricket and IPL. The two format of cricket that will continue to achieve more popularity and increase interest of fans and experts towards cricket all round the world.![]()
The broadcasters and other stakeholders are willing to shell out the money. Can they recoup all this money?
Yes they can as this is a matter of national pride and so 500m Indians will tune in even if they only pretend to enjoy it.
In the end it was Indian backed companies that bought the rights. Viacom18 and Star India.
This is just like USA buying its own Treasury bonds.
There is no international interest in IPL rights.
Keeping it in the Indian ferternity; inflated by domestic business, not international.
These are the facts.
Viacom 18 is partially owned by Paramount groups USA (as in Paramount pictures)
Star India is Disney.
Viacom 18 is partially owned by Paramount groups USA (as in Paramount pictures)
Star India is Disney.
This will lead to an increase in the Halves vs Halve nots, even the likes of England and Australia combined cannot compete financially with the BCCI
Clowns call everything circus because they don't understand anything outside of it.
BCCI pays millions in taxes and for every ticket sold, there is tax. For every as slot sold the broadcasters pay tax.
No you are wrong. Financially the entire cricketing world put together cannot compete with bcci.
CA and ECB tv rights altogether are around 2.2bn usd. Even if ICC tv rights go for 50 per cent more than its current 2bn valuation, its worth 3bn usd. The rest of the boards together can muster may be 500mn for their tv rights, though i am being very generous here.
They still cannot equal IPL. I haven't even added the bcci bilateral tv rights that will be sold in few months. If it goes for even 50 per cent more than its current 993mn usd, its another 1.5bn for the bcci.
BCCI has worked hard to get here. There was a time when bcci had to pay doordarshan 5L rupees to telecast a match. It took them court cases against the government to finally be able to sell their rights.
https://openthemagazine.com/sports/how-cricket-was-sold-in-india/
So this whining that this will increase the difference between haves and have nots is nothing but incompetent inefficient boards not doing anything.
For all the hype you were poor in the T20 WC and are getting owned by a poor SA team.
Just to put into perspective:
Overseas rights for the IPL were sold for 135 mn for 5 years thats 27mn per year is perhaps more than what any cricket league is paid.
Do you have brodcasting rights figures of bbl & the hundred ? I think both of them must be earning more than that considering per match value.
Even psl with shame is earning bit more than that per match.
Overseas rights are peanuts if you consider they sold 410 matches for just 135 million usd.
This is where it's looses against epl as global product but that's understandable considering cricket's unpopularity outside specific countries.
Do you have brodcasting rights figures of bbl & the hundred ? I think both of them must be earning more than that considering per match value.
Even psl with shame is earning bit more than that per match.
Overseas rights are peanuts if you consider they sold 410 matches for just 135 million usd.
This is where it's looses against epl as global product but that's understandable considering cricket's unpopularity outside specific countries.
Am seeing Indian posters on Twitter and Instagram and Facebook celebrating this achievement and calling for the BCCI to make IPL contracts exclusive forbidding players from participating in the PSL
Am seeing Indian posters on Twitter and Instagram and Facebook celebrating this achievement and calling for the BCCI to make IPL contracts exclusive forbidding players from participating in the PSL
Yes that would be the next logical step as jay shah would get dictat from his dad.
PSL offers a serious threat to IPL so it’s understandable BCCI is concerned and out to get PCB.
Yes that would be the next logical step as jay shah would get dictat from his dad.
PSL offers a serious threat to IPL so it’s understandable BCCI is concerned and out to get PCB.
Nope. There are many players that don't play international cricket. BCCI will be a fool to forbid players in other leagues unless IPL runs for 6 months. PSL is not a threat to IPL as they don't run in the same window. Also, there is no case of PSL taking away a coveted IPL player either.
Yes that would be the next logical step as jay shah would get dictat from his dad.
PSL offers a serious threat to IPL so it’s understandable BCCI is concerned and out to get PCB.
I cant see that happening tbh, Most International players from England, Aus etc wouldnt enter into these agreements as they make good enough money as it is, some will decide to top their salaries up in other leagues rather than spend 2/3 months exclusively in India especially after everyhting thats gone on during covid.
This would be an own goal for IPL and would drive the value of the product down. They just need to carry on what they doing it is good enough anyway.
The ICC could have a problem here. They have separated the subcontinent rights as bidding package on its own. What if Disney, Sony, et all only bid for subcontinent rights? Where/whom are they going to sell the rest of the rights.
Sky,Ch9, Fox and co usually are not interested and have never bid of ICC tournaments.
What ICC have done here is creditworthy. They are increasingly finding themselves in a tight squeeze and instead of allowing this to bog them down, they have shown they understand the new reality, demonstrated nimbleness and an ability to adapt. I like that.
Breaking up ICC rights between India and the rest acknowledges the reality that Indian broadcasters who would inevitably be otherwise bidding for a composite rights *only* care for Indian market. So ICC has unburdened them with global rights. This makes sense because the risk appetite and financial wherewithal of Indian broadcasters is depleted after the IPL showdown.
ICC can sell the rest of the rights to home broadcasters in ENG, AUS etc and perhaps even succeed in extracting a better deal this way.
At the end of the day, however, ICC still has to contend with the reality that ICC events don't have the same cachet they once had. Indian broadcasters understand that the Indian audience isn't all that hot for a vast majority of ICC events because 80 percent of the matches are SL vs Bang or NZ vs ZIM that nobody in India bothers with. I'd go so far as to claim that even matches like AUS vs ENG would get a fraction of the views that a random IPL match gets.
This dilutes the appeal of ICC events tremendously. I do not think ICC are going to get anywhere close to the sum they must have worked out internally from Indian broadcasters.