What's new

Is a long-term ceasefire between India and Pakistan feasible?

Is a long-term ceasefire between India and Pakistan feasible?


  • Total voters
    14
A cricket match is underway on a bright day on a rocky terrain overlooking the snow-clad Haji Peer Mountain Pass. The players are in their early adulthood. A batsman hits the ball hard, sending it downhill.

A group of cheerful young people chases it, spreading their joy in the surroundings.
It’s a rare sight and sound at Batgrah in the Pir Panjal Mountain Range in Haji Pir Sector along the Line of Control (LoC).

This frontier village in Jammu and Kashmir’s Baramulla district is not familiar with such scenes of laughter and enjoyment. Instead, it is accustomed to the shrill noise of mortar shells fired by Pakistan’s army from its bunkers camouflaged somewhere in mountains across the border.

But that has stopped, for now. Last month, India and Pakistan released a joint statement announcing a ceasefire along LoC from February 25, following talks between their Directors General of Military Operations.

For villagers of Batgrah, which is in Uri sub-division, this calls for celebrations. They can go about their lives from ploughing fields to rearing cattle without the ever-present fear of Pakistani shells wreaking havoc. But as they hope for a better tomorrow, they also count the cost of a bloody yesterday.

Marouf Ahmad, a final-year student of arts at a government college in Uri, is among those playing cricket. He recounts the horror of 2012, when one of his friends died in cross-border shelling in front of him. “We were on the way to an examination centre…Suddenly, a shell hit him and he was dead,” says Ahmad, 22.

Hafeez Ahmad Gojerchachee had gone out of the village for some work on June 12, 2020. On his trek uphill towards Batgrah, he saw a barrage of shells raining on the village. At that point, he could do nothing but pray for the safety of his family. Upon reaching his house, he found his mother, Akhter Begum, 48, lying lifeless in a pool of blood.

Gojerchachee, 26, who has two brothers and a sister, says it was their mother who raised them almost singlehandedly. “Our father has blurred vision and physical disabilities. Our mother used to earn money for the family by selling walnuts…She worked hard all her life. When it was time to see her children flourish, she was no more,” he says.

Gojerchachee has preserved remnants of the shell that killed his mother. He calls LoC a “bloody line”.

Then there are those who have suffered life-changing injuries. For example, 40-year-old Nazir Ahmad Masi, who is from Churunda village along the border. Walking on crutches, he has to take rest at regular intervals while traversing the tough terrain. An uphill trek seems too hard for him nowadays. In September 2000, Masi, who was then a porter with the Army, was hit by a shell that inflicted grave injuries in his left leg. “I was carrying water…when the shell hit me,” he says. Life has not been kind to him since.

At Balkote village, nearly 17km from Batgrah, 18-month-old Aliza Bano begins crying as soon as her 16-year-old sister, Shaista Bano, leaves her. Their mother, Farooqa Begum, 35, was killed in cross-border shelling last November. Shaista remembers the incident vividly: the shell landing in their hutment and the last moments of her mother, organs ruptured and blood oozing out.

Shaista has just passed her Class 10 exams. But alongside little Aliza, she also has to care for her two other siblings, Basharaat Ahmad, 10, and Simran Bano, 6. Their father, Bashir Ahmad Dar, is a labourer and spends most of the time out to earn for his family. The family has received Rs 50,000 as compensation from the administration so far, but the children are finding it hard to come to terms with the tragedy that has struck them.

Such grim examples galore. Residents of nearby Dana village still recount the fateful day in 1998 when their houses were destroyed in heavy shelling by Pakistan. Naseer Ahmad Dar, now 26, survived the bloodbath, as he was in his school in another village. But his parents died, while his sister suffered a life-changing injury. Her right leg had to be amputated.

On February 3, 2021, the government said in Parliament that 5,133 incidents of ceasefire violations were reported last year. There were 3,479 incidents in 2019, and 2,140 in 2018. Twenty-two civilians were killed in 2020, 18 in 2019 and 30 in 2018. While 24 security personnel were killed last year in cross-border firing, 19 were killed in 2019 and 29 in 2018.

In villages along the LoC, the signs of hostilities lay scattered in the form of rubbles of hutments, burnt roofs and damaged windows. Now that there is new hope, many have started rebuilding their damaged homes.

Several people in villages close to LoC work with the Army as porters. Others work in agricultural fields, rear cattle, or are employed as labourers. Locals here have grievances against the civil administration, even as they say they get help from the Army in difficult times.

Gojerchachee, from Batgrah village, says he is yet to receive compensation from the administration for his mother’s death.

“The file is stuck. Officials have told me to take the file myself to the DC (district commissioner) office in Baramulla,” says Gojerchachee, 26. “At least the Army provided some money to my family,” he adds.

An amount of Rs 1 lakh is paid to the family of a victim of cross-bordering firing, according to officials. Additionally, a person in that family is offered a government job. If the family does not accept that offer, it is paid Rs 4 lakh in compensation. Also, an amount of Rs 75,000 is paid in case of permanent disability and Rs 5,000 in case of an injury.

The amount is to be disbursed within three months of the incident, but the process of claim resolution could drag on for even a year, an official adds.

In June 2018, then home minister Rajnath Singh announced bulletproof ambulances and 14,000 government-built bunkers for the border population affected by ceasefire violations. But locals say they are yet to get the benefits.

Officials maintain that 44 such bunkers have been sanctioned for Uri’s 150,000 population. But, in most places, ditches have been dug and then left unattended. Locals say the pits are not big enough for a large crowd taking shelter during shelling.

Besides, they also complain of bad roads, which have made their tough lives even tougher. “There is no road here. Students have to wake up early and start their 15km journey to school on foot. The return journey uphill is more tiring. It is why our girls mostly study till middle or 10th standard,” says Gulzar Ahmad Chachee, 24, a resident of Batgrah.

On the grievances of villagers, Jammu and Kashmir divisional commissioner Pandurang Kondbarao Pole says the administration is not indifferent to their hardships.

“…as per the demand of the locals from these areas (that are affected by ceasefire violations), bunkers were approved. The concerned department (Roads and Buildings Department) was involved in the construction of those bunkers,” he says.

He adds that of the 2,200 habitations in the Valley, some 25-30 are yet to be covered under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana. “Rest all are covered. It includes border area habitations also,” he says.

He also underscores the challenges before the administration. “Topographical differences and difficulties remain…Border areas in Kashmir normally remain cut off in winters…(mountain) passes have to be crossed to reach Karnah, Keran, Gurez or parts of Uri. People may have faced difficulties, but there is nothing like indifference.”

https://www.news18.com/news/india/a...t-the-cost-of-a-bloody-yesterday-3523730.html
 
Cycles invariably turn, the world revolves, time withers away emotion. I don't expect the current state of affairs between India and Pakistan to persist forever, in fact history teaches us to regard that notion as ludicrous. There will be an eventual thawing in relations, maybe in 10 or 20 or 30 years, but there will come a time when both sides need to move past Kashmir.
 
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pakistan-india/pakistan-army-chief-says-ready-to-bury-hatchet-with-india-for-peace-idUSKBN2BA1S9

Pakistan’s army chief called on Thursday for arch rivals India and Pakistan to “bury the past” and move towards cooperation, an overture towards New Delhi that follows an unexpected joint ceasefire announcement last month between the two countries’ militaries.

General Qamar Javed Bajwa stressed however that the burden was on India to create a “conducive environment”, and said Washington had a role to play in ending regional conflicts.

Pakistan and India, both nuclear armed countries, have fought three wars and in 2019 tensions rose dramatically when they sent combat planes into each other’s territory.

“We feel it is time to bury the past and move forward,” Bajwa said in a speech at a conference in Islamabad meant to highlight the Pakistani government’s new security policies.

“But...our neighbour (India) will have to create a conducive environment, particularly in Indian-occupied Kashmir,” he said.

Pakistan’s powerful army has ruled the country for nearly half of its 73-year existence, and the military has long controlled foreign and security policies.

India and Pakistan both control parts of the northern Kashmir region, but both claim the Himalayan region in full - which has been a source for most of the conflicts between the two.

Relations deteriorated in 2019 after Delhi stripped its part of Kashmir of the special status it long had under the Indian constitution.

Bajwa said the economic potential of South and Central Asia had “forever remained hostage” to the India-Pakistan disputes.

The militaries of both countries released a rare joint statement on Feb. 25 announcing a ceasefire along the disputed border in Kashmir, having exchanged fire hundreds of times in recent months.

The United States immediately welcomed the move, and encouraged the two to “keep building on this progress”.

Bajwa said Pakistan had “hope” in the form of President Joe Biden’s new administration, which he said could help facilitate peace in the region.
 
Jammu and Kashmir DGP Dilbag Singh said on Saturday that there has been a 100 per cent drop in the ceasefire violations since the ceasefire agreement was resumed by India and Pakistan last month and no fresh cases of infiltration have been reported.

He was talking to reporters on the sidelines of the inauguration of Under-19 T20 Zonal- level Cricket Tournament at SK Cricket Stadium in Srinagar.

“Infiltration has been checked to a great extent, our security grid has been doing a good job all through the year,” he said. “There has been a 100 per cent drop in the cases of ceasefire violations along the borders after the resumption of ceasefire agreement.” He said Pakistan was using drones to send weapons into J&K. In 2020, weapons seized were double compared to the previous year. A total of 475 weapons were seized in 2020, including pistols, AK rifles, and M4 US rifles.

He said a large number of youth have shunned the path of violence and whatever little militant activity is seen in Srinagar city and some other areas will also come down.

He said religious leaders, social leaders and people from the media have to put their heads together to see that the youth does not go on the path of violence and does not play with their lives.

M4 duplicates made in Pak, Afghanistan

J&K police chief Dilbagh Singh claimed that American assault rifle M4, which was among the seized weapons in the union territory recently, was being illegally manufactured somewhere in Pakistan or Afghanistan.
He said, “The weapons seized last year was huge, incomparable to what we have seized in previous years. In all, there were 475 weapons seized last year.

“M4 actually is an American rifle but there are duplicates manufactured in Pakistan or Afghanistan,” he claimed.

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/j...ns-since-ceasefire-pact-resumed-jk-dgp-228207
 
About 24 hours after military chiefs from India and Pakistan surprised the world last month with a rare joint commitment to respect a 2003 cease-fire agreement, the top diplomat of the United Arab Emirates popped over to New Delhi for a quick one-day visit.

The official UAE readout of the Feb. 26 meeting gave few clues of what Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed spoke about with Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, noting they “discussed all regional and international issues of common interest and exchanged views on them.”

Yet behind closed doors, the India-Pakistan cease-fire marked a milestone in secret talks brokered by the UAE that began months earlier, according to officials aware of the situation who asked not to be identified. The cease-fire, one said, is only the beginning of a larger roadmap to forge a lasting peace between the neighbors, both of which have nuclear weapons and spar regularly over a decades-old territory dispute.

The next step in the process, the official said, involves both sides reinstating envoys in New Delhi and Islamabad, who were pulled in 2019 after Pakistan protested India’s move to revoke seven decades of autonomy for the disputed Muslim-majority state of Jammu and Kashmir. Then comes the hard part: Talks on resuming trade and a lasting resolution on Kashmir, the subject of three wars since India and Pakistan became independent from Britain in 1947.

Over the years, India and Pakistan have routinely made peace overtures only to have them quickly fall through, particularly as both sides frequently use the issue to stir up emotions around election time. Officials said expectations were low that the current detente would achieve much beyond the return of envoys and a resumption of trade through their Punjab land border.

But this process appears to be the most concerted effort in years, and comes as the Biden administration is seeking wider peace talks on Afghanistan -- a place both countries for years have battled for influence. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi wants to shore up growth and focus military resources on the border with China, while Pakistan’s leaders are also facing economic woes and looking to make a good impression with the U.S. and other powers.

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry didn’t comment on the talks or the role of the UAE, while the foreign ministries of India and the UAE had no immediate comment.

Last week Pakistan army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa asked India “to bury the past and move forward” while saying the military was ready to enter talks to resolve “all our outstanding issues.” The comments came a day after Prime Minister Imran Khan after called for a resolution on Kashmir, which he described as “the one issue that holds us back.”

On Saturday, Modi sent a tweet wishing Khan well after he was diagnosed with Covid-19 -- another sign that relations between the countries are getting warmer.

The UAE, which has historic trade and diplomatic links with India and Pakistan, has taken a more assertive international role under de facto ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The biggest shift has been in the Middle East where the Gulf Arab state has intervened in conflicts and backed groups and regional leaders. But it has also looked to Asia as it strengthens political alliances beyond its role as a global trade and logistics hub.

India-Pakistan ties were effectively cut off two years ago after a suicide attack in India-controlled Kashmir killed 40 Indian soldiers, prompting Modi’s government to authorize air strikes on alleged terror facilities inside Pakistan. The joint statement last month said the two sides “agreed to address each other’s core issues,” signaling a wider discussion on Kashmir and terrorism.

Several clues over the past few months pointed at the UAE’s role. In November, Jaishankar met bin Zayed and the crown prince on a two-day visit to Abu Dhabi, followed by Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi the following month. Roughly two weeks before the Feb. 25 announcement, the UAE foreign minister held a phone call with Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan “wherein they discussed regional and international issues of interest.” And just days before, India allowed Khan’s aircraft to fly over Indian airspace as he headed to Sri Lanka for a state visit -- a practice suspended since the 2019 hostilities.

After the cease-fire, the UAE was one of a handful of countries to issue a statement welcoming the cease-fire announcement, highlighting the “close historical ties” it has with both India and Pakistan and hailing “the efforts made by both countries to come to this agreement.” In Washington, State Department spokesman Ned Price dodged a question on what role the U.S. played in bringing the two sides together while urging Pakistan to play a constructive role in Afghanistan, Kashmir and other places.

“Obviously Pakistan has an important role to play when it comes to Afghanistan and what takes place across its other border,” Price said on Feb. 25. “So clearly, we will be paying close attention.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...stan-peace-roadmap-brokered-by-top-uae-royals
 
The problem is Modi ji needs a puching bag to hide his failures.
Pakistan army needs a bogey man to justify its hegemony over Pakistan's economy.
It's a symbiotic relationship.
 
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2290996/pakistani-envoy-to-india-says-islamabad-wants-friendly-relations-with-all-neighbours

In yet another sign of thawing of relationship, Pakistan's acting high commissioner to New Delhi on Tuesday said Islamabad wants friendly relations with all its neighbours including India stressing that peace was inevitable in the South Asia region.

"For the larger interest of the region peace within South Asia is inevitable," said Pakistani Charge d’ Affairs Aftab Hasan Khan while addressing an event in New Delhi to mark Pakistan Day.

According to the statement issued by the Pakistani mission in New Delhi, Khan said that Pakistan wants to have friendly relations with all countries including India.

"To achieve peace between Pakistan and India both countries shall resolve all outstanding issues including IIOJK through dialogue," he stressed.

His statement appears to suggest that both countries are trying to lower the rhetoric in order to create a conducive environment for further engagement.

The relationship between the two neighbours has been on the mend since the two countries in an unexpected move announced to restore the 2003 ceasefire on February 25.

Since then both sides have been visibly trying to send positive signals. While the Pakistani leadership is giving conciliatory statements, India also opted to avoid giving hostile statements against Islamabad.

Another sign that the two countries are willing to re-engage is the holding of the meeting of the Permanent Indus Commission in New Delhi. The two-day meeting kicked off in New Delhi on Tuesday was taking place after a gap of two and a half years.

There are reports that the UAE is trying to mediate between the two countries.

Meanwhile, Charge d’ Affairs Khan in his remarks extended warm felicitations on Pakistan National Day and lauded the zeal with which the broader Pakistan High Commission family participated in the event.

Charge d’ Affaires said that on 23rd March 1940, the Muslims of India under the dynamic leadership of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah made a resolve to make a separate homeland for themselves.

He said every year on this day we renew our resolve, to make Pakistan a modern Islamic and democratic welfare state in the light of the guiding principles of Quaid Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

In the end, he stressed the importance of each successive generation to contribute its own part with honesty, hard work and dedication toward the realization of Quaid’s vision.

Students of the Pakistan High Commission School presented national songs and tableau on the occasion. Erum Aftab, the wife of Aftab Hasan Khan, gave away prizes and gifts to the teachers and students of the school.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BIG?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BIG</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BreakingNews?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BreakingNews</a> Approval to open trade between <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Pakistan?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Pakistan</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/India?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#India</a> is expected tomorrow. A summary of cotton and sugar imports from <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/India?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#India</a> will be presented in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Pakistani?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Pakistani</a> Cabinet Economic Coordination Committee for approval on Wednesday , meeting called <a href="https://t.co/tXgUvop6ts">pic.twitter.com/tXgUvop6ts</a></p>— Ghulam Abbas Shah (@ghulamabbasshah) <a href="https://twitter.com/ghulamabbasshah/status/1376934216504606720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pakistan-india/pakistan-pm-khan-desires-peace-with-arch-rival-india-idUSKBN2BM2HQ?il=0

Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan on Tuesday replied to a letter written by his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi, and said Islamabad desires peaceful relations with New Delhi, an official source told Reuters.

Modi had written to Khan on the occasion of Pakistan’s Republic Day on March 23, also calling for peaceful relations between the two nuclear-armed rivals.

Dated March 29, the letter wasn’t officially released by either side but the official, speaking on anonymity, confirmed its contents which were shared widely on social media.

“The people of Pakistan also desire peaceful, cooperative relations with all neighbours, including India,” Khan said in his reply, adding, “I thank you for your letter conveying greetings on Pakistan Day.”

Neither the Indian or Pakistani foreign ministries responded to requests for comment.

Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper quoted Modi’s letter on March 23, Modi as saying that “India desires cordial relations with the people of Pakistan” and “for this, an environment of trust, devoid of terror and hostility, is imperative.”

India and Pakistan have fought three wars and have shared a fractious relationship since the two gained independence in 1947, and in 2019 tensions rose dramatically as they sent combat planes into each other’s territory.

Pakistani army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa has called on both the nations to bury the past after the militaries of both countries released a rare joint statement last month announcing a ceasefire along a disputed border in Kashmir.
 
https://www.geo.tv/latest/342402-pakistan-india-trade-relations-may-resume-soon-say-sources

Trade relations between Pakistan and India may resume soon and preparations are being made to import sugar, cotton, and yarn from India, Geo News reported Tuesday, citing sources.

According to sources, the Ministry of Commerce will submit summaries prepared in this regard to the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) for approval tomorrow.

Meanwhile, the commerce ministry has sent the summaries to the ECC with the approval of Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Sources added that it has been suggested to import sugar from India through the Chinese Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) as well as some commercial importers.

At present, Indian exporters are not allowed to participate in TCP tenders due to a ban.

Per the report, it is proposed to import cotton and yarn from India by June 30, 2021, while the method of import will be via land.

Government sources say that Pakistan has to import cotton to meet the shortfall, adding that importing cotton and yarn from neighbouring India will be cheaper for Pakistan.

It may be recalled that Pakistan had suspended bilateral trade with India in August 2019.
 
Pakistan, India FMs avoid blame game in Dushanbe

Diplomatic sources say this is part of understanding between the two countries to lower the rhetoric

Pakistan and Indian foreign ministers may not have met on the sidelines of Heart of Asia-Istanbul conference in Dushanbe but the top diplomats on Tuesday avoided pointing fingers at each other in their speeches in a clearest indication that the two neighbours are looking to lower the rhetoric.

The speeches by both the foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi and his Indian counterpart S Jaishankar, were a departure from their previous statements. Unlike, previous sessions of Heart of Asia conference, this time both sides avoided using the platform to cast aspirations against each other.

The Indian external affairs minister did not mention Pakistan in his speech that largely focused on supporting the peace efforts. Qureshi, too, only made a terse reference of “spoilers both within and outside Afghanistan’ but he didn’t not name India in his speech.

Diplomatic sources said that this was part of the understanding between the two countries to lower the rhetoric. Qureshi later told reporters in Dushanbe that there had been some movement on Pakistan, India relationship.

He particularly mentioned the February 25 understanding between the director generals military operation of the two countries on restoring the ceasefire on the Line of Control (LoC). He said that this would benefit the people of Kashmir.

Qureshi also noted that the Indian foreign minister did not make the usual allegations against Pakistan in his speech. This, he believed, was a welcome development. Responding to a question, he said that he had no encounter or interaction with Jaishankar. “Pakistan never shies away from talks but for that India has to create a conducive environment,” he added.

There was lot of hype before the Heart of Asia conference since many were speculating that the two foreign ministers might meet. Both sides had denied that any meeting was scheduled or any side sought for the interaction on the conference fringes.

But the fact the two foreign ministers avoided blaming each other’s countries is something that observers think may lead to some level of engagement between the two countries.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2292302/pakistan-india-fms-avoid-blame-game-in-dushanbe
 
Former Indian diplomat Satinder Lambah, who has been involved in backchannel diplomacy between Islamabad and New Delhi, has welcomed the recent thaw in the relations between the two arch rivals.

Lambah, who served as special envoy to ex-Indian premier Manmohan Singh and ran the official back-channel between India and Pakistan, said in an interview with The Hindu that backdoor talks, if true, between Indian National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval and Pakistan’s army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa would be a “good combination”.

“Our two countries have different power structures, and therefore we need people who have seniority in their own systems, direct access and confidence of the leadership. They need to be able to take on-the-spot decisions,” he said while responding to a question.

The seasoned diplomat said despite all differences between the two countries, Gen Bajwa and NSA Doval would be a “good combination” to oversee the dialogue.

“History shows that Pakistan army chiefs think of improving relations with India only after stabilising themselves. General Zia suggested back channel talks after nine years in office, just before his death. General Musharraf started his peace overtures five years after taking over; and General Bajwa, three years after becoming army chief. Such occasions come after a gap of several years,” he added.

Lambah welcomed the current development on India-Pakistan ties, saying, "We need people who have seniority in their own systems, direct access and confidence of the leadership".

Lambah, who ran the official back-channel from 2005-2014 stressed that a previous deal on trade that was derailed in 2014, and the agreement on Jammu and Kashmir between Indian and Pakistan are valid even today.

Without elaborating much, the former envoy said the recent backdoor negotiations between the two countries are bilateral and it is very unlikely that any other country including UAE had any involvement. Although it may be influenced by the US President Joe “Biden effect,” he added.

Lambah said the agreement on Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan is still valid because it was not negotiated “for a specific era or political regime”.

While suggesting steps to improve ties between the two nuclear-armed nations, the former Indian official said he believed that engagement is necessary particularly with an adversary “and I am glad it is being done now”.

“India’s biggest friends and ambassadors are Pakistanis who visit India and then return to tell others about all that we have achieved.

“At a suitable occasion, respective High Commissioners should be reinstated. Track – II dialogues should be held. There is no need to shy away from any discussion, because our fundamentals are strong,” he added.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2293558/bajwa-doval-duo-good-for-back-door-negotiations-ex-indian-envoy
 
WASHINGTON: The US State Department has refused to comment on Pakistan cancelling an earlier decision to import sugar and cotton from India but did ask the two neighbours to hold direct talks to normalise relations.

“I wouldn’t want to comment on that specifically. What I would say is that we continue to support direct dialogue between India and Pakistan on issues of concern,” said the department’s spokesperson Ned Price when asked what Washington thought of this development.

On March 31, the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) announced in Islamabad that it was allowing the private sector to import 0.5 million tons of white sugar from India. The committee also approved another proposal to import cotton from India starting June this year.

But on April 1, the federal cabinet deferred the ECC’s decision to allow imports from India until New Delhi reinstates Article 370 of its Constitution, which guaranteed a semi-autonomous status for India-held Kashmir.

Pakistan suspended bilateral trade with India in August 2019 when New Delhi announced its decision to change Kashmir’s status.

The now defunct decision to resume trade with India had followed an agreement between Islamabad and New Delhi to observe a ceasefire on the Line of Control after months of tensions. The move had rekindled hopes that the two nuclear-armed neighbours would start taking baby steps towards normalising relations.

In 2018-19, India and Pakistan traded only $494.87 million worth of goods and that too mostly favoured India.

At the State Department briefing on Tuesday, Mr Price also reiterated the Biden administration’s desire to end America’s military presence in Afghanistan but did not say if Washington will meet the May 1 deadline.

The Trump administration had signed an agreement with the Taliban which required Washington to withdraw its troops by May 1. The Biden administration recognises the agreement but seems reluctant to meet the deadline.

“We are committed to bringing a responsible end to the conflict, removing our troops from harm’s way” but not without “ensuring that Afghanistan can never again become a platform, a launch pad, for terrorist attacks that would threaten the United States or our allies,” Mr Price said.

Published in Dawn, April 8th, 2021
 
ISLAMABAD:For the first time the Foreign Office has publicly acknowledged that Pakistan and India were in contact with each other despite tensions.

"States have their ways and means to communicate which remain available even during wars. Therefore, whether any talks are taking place between Pakistan and India is not important," Foreign Office spokesperson Zahid Hafeez Chaudhri told his weekly news briefing on Friday.

"What is important is: one, whether Pakistan should talk to India; two, what should be discussed between the two sides; and three, what constitutes conducive environment for a meaningful and result-oriented dialogue," Chaudhri explained

He was responding to a series of questions regarding any talks taking place between Pakistan and India. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov during his visit to Islamabad gave the impression that dialogue between the two countries had been resumed. This raised many eyebrows since India and Pakistan never formally admitted they were holding talks.

When asked the spokesperson did not opt for categorically denying the talks. Instead his answer gave an impression that the two countries were in touch with each other. The spokesperson did not specify which mode of communication the two countries were using.

Observers believe that Feb 25 understanding between the DGMOs on the ceasefire could be the result of back channel efforts.

There has also been a visible change in the tone and tenor of India and Pakistan against each other.

The recent exchange of letter between the Indian and Pakistani Prime Ministers was also seen as a sign of thaw.

"As for talks, Pakistan has never shied away from talks with India and has always maintained for the need of a ‘meaningful dialogue’ and peaceful resolution of all outstanding disputes, including Jammu and Kashmir dispute," he said.

"We believe durable peace, security and development in the region hinge on peaceful resolution of the long-standing Jammu and Kashmir dispute," the spokesperson said.

Hafiz said India had vitiated the atmosphere, and the onus was on India to create an enabling and conducive environment for talks between the two countries.

To another question, the spokesperson said as for the appointment of high commissioners was concerned, no such decision had taken place as yet.

He said Pakistan was ready to host the Saarc summit the moment "artificial barriers" were removed when asked if Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi would visit Islamabad for the regional conference later this year.

On the statement of the US that Pakistan and India should hold direct talks to resolve all outstanding issues, the spokesperson said the international community had an important role to play in ensuing peace and stability in the region.

"As for the role of third parties including the US is concerned, we believe that the international community has an important role to play in averting risks to peace and stability in the region and facilitating a just and lasting solution to the Jammu & Kashmir dispute in accordance with the UN Security Council Resolutions."

As for the withdrawal of the US troops, the spokesperson said Pakistan supported ‘orderly’ and ‘responsible’ withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan as "we believe that a precipitous withdrawal would create a vacuum for spoilers."

"The Afghan peace process made significant progress last year. We believe that it is critical that the progress made in the peace process is maintained and further built upon in order to achieve its stated objectives of a peaceful political settlement in Afghanistan."

"All parties must work together for an inclusive, broad-based and comprehensive political settlement," the spokesperson said.

DAWN
 
India-Pakistan crises likely to intensify, China tensions still high: US intel

The US has followed the border conflict closely and condemned China’s aggression in strong terms. It has also expedited certain military supplies requisitioned by India.

India-China border tensions “remain high” despite pullbacks of forces and although a war between India and Pakistan is “unlikely”, crises between them will become “more intense, risking an escalatory cycle”, the US intelligence community said on Tuesday in its annual assessment of threats around the world.

It added that under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India was “more likely than in the past to respond with military force to perceived or real Pakistani provocations, and heightened tensions raise the risk of conflict between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, with violent unrest in Kashmir or a militant attack in India being potential flashpoints”.

For the US, the intelligence community saw China as “a near-peer competitor, challenging the US in multiple arenas”; Russia as “pushing back against Washington where it can globally, employing techniques up to and including the use of force”; Iran was described as a “regional menace” with broader malign influence activities; and North Korea as a “disruptive player on the regional and world stages”.

The report — released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence — said China was seeking to use “coordinated, whole-of-government tools to demonstrate its growing strength and compel regional neighbours to acquiesce to Beijing’s preferences”, including its claims over disputed territory and assertions of sovereignty over Taiwan. India-China border “tensions remain high, despite some force pullbacks this year”, the report said, adding: “China’s occupation since May 2020 of contested border areas is the most serious escalation in decades and led to the first lethal border clash between the two countries since 1975.”

As of mid-February, “after multiple rounds of talks, both sides were pulling back forces and equipment from some sites along the disputed border”, the report added on the India-China conflict.

The US has followed the border conflict closely and condemned China’s aggression in strong terms. It has also expedited certain military supplies requisitioned by India.

About others in India’s neighbourhood, the report said that the Myanmar military’s February seizure of power, detention of state counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi, and declaration of a one-year state of emergency “marked a break in that country’s democratic transition and ushered in new societal instability and widespread popular protests”.

For Afghanistan, which has become America’s longest war, the report said: “We assess that prospects for a peace deal will remain low during the next year. The Taliban is likely to make gains on the battlefield, and the Afghan Government will struggle to hold the Taliban at bay if the coalition withdraws support”.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/indiapakistan-crises-likely-to-intensify-china-tensions-still-high-us-intel-101618362034731.html
 
India and Pakistan held secret talks this year in Dubai to break political impasse

Seems that there was a definite thawing of relations before the inevitable setback.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-pakistan-peace-exclusive/exclusive-india-pakistan-held-secret-talks-to-try-to-break-kashmir-impasse-idUSKBN2C12E1?il=0

Top intelligence officers from India and Pakistan held secret talks in Dubai in January in a new effort to calm military tension over the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir, people with close knowledge of the matter told Reuters in Delhi.

Ties between the nuclear-armed rivals have been on ice since a suicide bombing of an Indian military convoy in Kashmir in 2019 traced to Pakistan-based militants that led to India sending warplanes to Pakistan.

Later that year, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi withdrew Indian-ruled Kashmir’s autonomy in order to tighten his grip over the territory, provoking outrage in Pakistan and the downgrading of diplomatic ties and suspension of bilateral trade.

But the two governments have re-opened a back channel of diplomacy aimed at a modest roadmap to normalising ties over the next several months, the people said.

Kashmir has long been a flashpoint between India and Pakistan, both of which claim all of the region but rule only in part.

Officials from India’s Research and Analysis Wing, the external spy agency, and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence travelled to Dubai for a meeting facilitated by the United Arab Emirates government, two people said.

The Indian foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment. Pakistan’s military, which controls the ISI, also did not respond.

But Ayesha Siddiqa, a top Pakistani defence analyst, said she believed Indian and Pakistan intelligence officials had been meeting for several months in third countries.

“I think there have been meetings in Thailand, in Dubai, in London between the highest level people,” she said. Such meetings have taken place in the past too, especially during times of crises but never been publicly acknowledged.

“There is a lot that can still go wrong, it is fraught,” said one of the people in Delhi. “That is why nobody is talking it up in public, we don’t even have a name for this, it’s not a peace process. You can call it a re-engagement,” one of them said.

Both countries have reasons to seek a rapprochement. India has been locked in a border stand-off with China since last year and does not want the military stretched on the Pakistan front.

China-ally Pakistan, mired in economic difficulties and on an IMF bailout programme, can ill-afford heightened tensions on the Kashmir border for a prolonged period, experts say. It also has to stabilise the Afghan border on its west as the United States withdraws.

“It’s better for India and Pakistan to talk than not talk, and even better that it should be done quietly than in a glare of publicity,” said Myra MacDonald, a former Reuters journalist who has just published a book on India, Pakistan and war on the frontiers of Kashmir.

“...But I don’t see it going very far beyond a basic management of tensions, possibly to tide both countries over a difficult period - Pakistan needs to address the fall-out of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, while India has to confront a far more volatile situation on its disputed frontier with China.” Following the January meeting, India and Pakistan announced they would stop cross-border shooting along the Line of Control (LoC) dividing Kashmir which has left dozens of civilians dead and many others maimed. That ceasefire is holding, military officials in both countries said.

Both sides have also signalled plans to hold elections on their sides of Kashmir this year as part of efforts to bring normalcy to a region riven by decades of bloodshed.

The two have also agreed to dial down their rhetoric, the people Reuters spoke to said.

This would include Pakistan dropping its loud objections to Modi abrogating Kashmir’s autonomy in August 2019, while Delhi in turn would refrain from blaming Pakistan for all violence on its side of the Line of Control.

These details have not been previously reported. India has long blamed Pakistan for the revolt in Kashmir, an allegation denied by Pakistan.

“There is a recognition there will be attacks inside Kashmir, there has been discussions as to how to deal with it and not let this effort derailed by the next attack,” one of the people said.

There is as yet, however, no grand plan to resolve the 74-year-old Kashmir dispute. Rather both sides are trying to reduce tensions to pave the way for a broad engagement, all the people Reuters spoke to said.

“Pakistan is transiting from a geo-strategic domain to a geo-economic domain,” Raoof Hasan, special assistant to Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, told Reuters.

“Peace, both within and around with its neighbours, is a key constituent to facilitate that.”
 
Last edited:
Talks were so secret that these were published in news website :yk :))

On a serious note, a sane and sensible decision.

Talks and negotiation is the key forward for Pak / India's future.

War will only bring destruction and make European/'Murican weapon makers rich meanwhile these 2 countries will spend their scarce resources on hoarding weapons instead of education/healthcare...
 
These agreements don't last. Fighting across the LoC has only temporarily stopped.
 
Talk nah!

It was always in Pakistan’s interest to talk to India. Now with the China stand off, and Covid breaking down the economy it is India’s interest as well to talk to Pakistan. India’s think tank will need to reverse the brain washing it has done to its public over the years that war was the only solution!
 
The United Arab Emirates' (UAE) envoy to Washington confirmed the Gulf state is mediating between India and Pakistan to help the nuclear-armed rivals reach a “healthy and functional” relationship.

Top intelligence officers from India and Pakistan held secret talks in Dubai in January in a new effort to calm military tension over the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir, people with knowledge of the matter had told Reuters.

Ambassador Yousef Al Otaiba said in a virtual discussion with Stanford University's Hoover Institution on Wednesday that the UAE played a role “in bringing Kashmir escalation down and created a ceasefire, hopefully ultimately leading to restoring diplomats and getting the relationship back to a healthy level”.

“They might not sort of become best friends but at least we want to get it to a level where it's functional, where it's operational, where they are speaking to each other,” he said.

Ties between India and Pakistan have been frozen since a suicide bombing of an Indian military convoy in occupied Kashmir in 2019 was blamed on Pakistan, leading to India sending warplanes to Pakistan.

Later that year, India's prime minister withdrew the occupied region's autonomy in order to tighten his grip over the territory, provoking outrage in Pakistan and the downgrading of diplomatic ties and suspension of bilateral trade.

Otaiba also said that Pakistan should play a helpful role in Afghanistan, where the United States plans to start withdrawing US troops on May 1 to end America's longest war.

The Emirati official voiced concern that an abrupt US withdrawal would constitute “reverse progress” by serving the interests of “the more illiberal forces” in Afghanistan.

“The question is if the three parties (the US, Taliban and Afghan government) can reach an agreement that they can all live with,” Otaiba said.

“It's hard for us to see a way to stabilise Afghanistan without Pakistan playing a helpful role,” he added.

Turkey is due to host a peace summit for Afghanistan from April 24 to May 4 meant to jump-start efforts to end the war and sketch out a possible political settlement.
 
ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi is all set to leave today (Saturday) for the United Arab Emirates for a three-day official trip.

This will be the foreign minister's first official visit to the Emirates in the backdrop of confirmation by Emirati Ambassador to the US Yousef al-Otaiba, who said Pakistani and Indian officials had travelled to Dubai for backdoor negotiations.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement detailing the FM's plans on the UAE visit.

He will hold talks with the UAE's counterpart on the entire spectrum of bilateral relations and regional situation.

The Foreign Minister will also meet Pakistani community in the Emirate besides interacting with the local and international media.

FM Qureshi will meet his counterpart, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan and other UAE dignitaries. Meetings with Pakistani diaspora and interactions with local and international media are also on the FM's agenda.

The MOFA statement confirmed that FM Qureshi will hold consultations with the UAE’s leadership on all areas of bilateral cooperation, including collaboration in trade and investment, job opportunities for Pakistani workforce and the welfare of Pakistani diaspora.

He will also discuss regional and global issues of mutual interest. The UAE is home to the second largest Pakistani community abroad.

Pakistan and the UAE enjoy strong fraternal ties, rooted deep in common faith and shared history and values, the MOFA statement read, adding that high-level visits between the two countries have played a pivotal role in providing further impetus to strengthening bilateral cooperation and collaboration on a wide range of issues.

On Thursday, the Gulf state's envoy to Washington confirmed that the UAE is mediating between India and Pakistan to help the nuclear-armed rivals reach a “healthy and functional” relationship.
In January, top intelligence officers from India and Pakistan held secret talks in Dubai in a renewed effort to calm military tension over Kashmir, people with knowledge of the matter had told Reuters.

Ambassador Yousef Al Otaiba said in a virtual discussion with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution on Wednesday that the UAE played a role “in bringing Kashmir escalation down and created a ceasefire, hopefully ultimately leading to restoring diplomats and getting the relationship back to a healthy level”.

“They might not sort of become best friends but at least we want to get it to a level where it’s functional, where it’s operational, where they are speaking to each other,” he said.

Ties between India and Pakistan have been frozen since a suicide bombing of an Indian military convoy in Kashmir in 2019 which India accused Pakistan of backing, and which Pakistan has always maintained was a home-grown attack perpetrated by disillusioned Kashmiri youth.

The incident eventually led to India sending warplanes to Pakistan for an unsuccessful mission that ended with the planes dropping their payload on a hillside in Balakot. Pakistan retaliated soon after, capturing an Indian pilot and downing two Indian jets in the process.

GEO
 
Pakistan, India FMs’ presence in UAE sets off speculations

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2295278/pakistan-india-fms-presence-in-uae-sets-off-speculations

The foreign ministers of Pakistan and India will be in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) tomorrow (Sunday), setting off speculations the top diplomats may meet as part of efforts to seek rapprochement.

Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi arrived in the UAE on Saturday on a three-day official visit, confirmed the Foreign Office in a statement.

The moment Qureshi landed in the Gulf country, the Indian government announced that External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar would be in Abu Dhabi for a day trip on April 18.

This means both Qureshi and Jaishankar would be in Abu Dhabi at the same time. There is no official confirmation from either sides if the two foreign ministers meet.

But the possibility of a meeting is not ruled out by some sources. The UAE’s role in seeking rapprochement between Pakistan and India has been the subject of discussions in recent weeks.

Several reports suggested that the UAE was mediating between the two countries. There were even reports that senior intelligence officials of Pakistan and India had met in Dubai in January leading to the ceasefire between the two countries along the Line of Control (LoC).

The UAE Ambassador to Washington also confirmed that his country was facilitating dialogue between the two countries. The envoy said the idea behind the UAE’s effort was to ensure that Pakistan and India have a functional relationship.

When asked about the claims, Foreign Office spokesperson Zahid Hafiz Chaudhri in his weekly briefing on Friday did not deny such reports. He simply said states did have ways and means to communicate each other even during the times of war.

Meanwhile, the Foreign Office said during the visit, the foreign minister will meet his counterpart Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan and other UAE dignitaries.

Also read: 'Pakistan, India held secret talks to break Kashmir impasse'

In response to queries from some media colleagues on a possible meeting between Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi and Minister of External Affairs of India, S Jaishankar, the spokesperson said: “No such meeting is scheduled during Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi’s ongoing visit to the UAE”.

The foreign minister will also meet Pakistani diaspora and interact with local and international media.

The foreign minister will hold consultations with the UAE’s leadership on all areas of bilateral cooperation, including collaboration in trade and investment, job opportunities for Pakistani workforce and the welfare of Pakistani diaspora.

He will also discuss regional and global issues of mutual interest. The UAE is home to the second largest Pakistani community abroad.

"Pakistan and the UAE enjoy strong fraternal ties, rooted deep in common faith and shared history and values. High-level visits between the two countries have played a pivotal role in providing further impetus to strengthening bilateral cooperation and collaboration on a wide range of issues," according to the Foreign Office statement.

Qureshi will also visit Iran, Qatar and Turkey as part of Pakistan’s diplomatic efforts to evolve a consensus on the Afghan situation.
 
ISLAMABAD:

Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Sunday ruled out backchannel talks between Islamabad and New Delhi, saying he was not scheduled to meet his Indian counterpart, Dr S Jaishankar.

"I am here for a bilateral visit and not an India-specific agenda. My agenda is UAE-Pakistan and not India-Pakistan,” he told the media in Dubai, a day after reaching the UAE on a three-day visit, putting an end to speculations triggered by New Delhi's announcement that its external affairs minister would also be in the Gulf nation for a day.

“I don’t think a meeting is set out with the Indian foreign minister,” he added.

The minister further said Islamabad had never shied away from addressing problems through dialogue.

“We are ready to hold talks with New Delhi if the latter reviews its decision to revoke the semi-autonomous status of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK),” he added.

“We want peace in the region and cordial ties with all our neighbours including India.”

The minister welcomed the UAE’s mediation in resolving Pakistan’s issues with India.

“We welcome third-party facilitation but no matter what friends say, the initiative has to be indigenous,” he added.

Also read: Pakistan, India FMs’ presence in UAE sets off speculations

“They can be suggestive and facilitators but, ultimately, it is the people of South Asia who have to decide what kind of future they visualise.”

The foreign minister said friends generally, including the UAE, had always said the two countries should sit and resolve issues through dialogue.

“India has always been hesitant of a third-party mediation. We have always welcomed it and were never shy of it.”

Qureshi also invited his Afghan counterpart Muhammad Haneef Atmar to Islamabad following the Istanbul conference, scheduled to be held later this month.

The invitation was extended during a telephonic conversation held between the two foreign ministers.

During the conversation, the two leaders also discussed the progress made so far on the Afghan peace process.

Qureshi and his counterpart also exchanged felicitations for the month of Ramazan.

Speaking to the Afghan minister, Qureshi maintained that a peaceful, stable Afghanistan was in the interest of Pakistan, adding that the country wished for a reduction in violence in the war-torn country.

Read more: Speculation rises of Qureshi meeting Indian counterpart

Qureshi further said that Pakistan was a partner in the efforts for peace in the region and committed to continue its conciliatory assistance to make Afghanistan peaceful and stable.

The foreign minister hoped that the "Istanbul Process" would help make the Doha Agreement successful in its efforts to establish lasting peace in Afghanistan.

The Afghan foreign minister appreciated Pakistan's continued diplomatic, political and moral support in making the Afghan peace process fruitful, thanking Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood and the Pakistani leadership.

Speaking at an Iftar dinner hosted by the Pakistan Business Council in Dubai, Qureshi said it was a matter of satisfaction that despite the ill effects of the global coronavirus pandemic, Pakistan had achieved positive results through its economic diplomacy.

He said the government with its economic diplomacy had successfully attracted the world towards the business opportunities available in Pakistan.

The foreign minister assured that welfare and resolution of the problems being faced by expatriate Pakistanis were among the top priorities of the incumbent government.

He said it was a matter of pleasure that a huge number of Pakistanis were residing in the UAE and playing a positive role in the development and progress of the country.

Qureshi stated that the aim of his visit was to promote trade relations between Pakistan and the UAE in multiple fields.

The moment Qureshi landed in the Gulf country, the Indian government announced that its external affairs minister would be in Abu Dhabi for a day trip on April 18, setting off speculations the top diplomats may meet as part of efforts to seek rapprochement.

Several reports suggested that the UAE was mediating between the two countries. There were even reports that senior intelligence officials of Pakistan and India had met in Dubai in January leading to the ceasefire between the two countries along the Line of Control (LoC).

The UAE ambassador to Washington also confirmed that his country was facilitating dialogue between the two countries. The envoy said the idea behind the UAE’s effort was to ensure that Pakistan and India had a functional relationship.
 
Pakistan wants to live in peace with all its neighbours including India: FM Qureshi

Pakistan is ready to talk with India if it reverses August 5 decision, the FM adds


Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Monday said that Pakistan never evaded talks and wants to live in peace with all its neighbours including India.

The FM's remarks came while speaking at a news conference in UAE where he reached on April 17 for a three-day official visit.

"Both India and Pakistan will have to think about their bilateral ties," the foreign minister said. "Pakistan is ready to talk with India if it takes back its steps of August 5. Pakistan cannot ignore the Kashmir issue."

FM Qureshi added Pakistan desired peace in the region as peace would ensure better economy and more economic opportunities will be created.

"Visit to the United Arab Emirates will strengthen existing bilateral ties between the two countries," he added.

He further added that the government wanted to give the right to vote to the overseas Pakistanis and it is consulting with other political parties on the issue.

He would also meet with his counterpart Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed bin Sultan and other UAE dignitaries in Abu Dhabi today.

Earlier it was reported that Foreign Minister Qureshi had ruled out backchannel talks between Islamabad and New Delhi, saying that he was not scheduled to meet his Indian counterpart, Dr S Jaishankar.

"I am here for a bilateral visit and not an India-specific agenda. My agenda is UAE-Pakistan and not India-Pakistan,” he told the media in Dubai, a day after reaching the UAE on a three-day visit, putting an end to speculations triggered by New Delhi's announcement that its external affairs minister would also be in the Gulf nation for a day.

“I don’t think a meeting is set out with the Indian foreign minister,” he added.

The minister further said Islamabad had never shied away from addressing problems through dialogue.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2295553/pakistan-wants-to-live-in-peace-with-all-its-neighbours-including-india-fm-qureshi
 
Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi on Tuesday said that dialogue between Pakistan and India would only take place if the situation in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) improves.

"Kashmir is not bilateral; rather an internationally recognised issue as there are numerous UN Security Council resolutions on it," FM Qureshi said in an interview with Khaleej Times.

The foreign minister added that if India and Pakistan want lasting peace in South Asia, they would have to discuss the IIOJK issue to find a resolution according to the aspirations of the Kashmiri people, as the issue cannot be put on the back burner.

Qureshi maintained that Pakistan was comfortable with the role the UAE can play to improve relations between India and Pakistan.

"We want to move ahead, but in order to get there, India, which is responsible for vitiating the environment will have to create a conducive and enabling environment, for the dialogue to take place," he added.

Qureshi said Pakistan would appreciate anyone and everyone including UAE to play a positive and constructive role, but the initiative will have to be indigenous.

"There have been some positive developments, as India says it wants to see a peaceful Afghanistan and region but Kashmiris on both sides of the Line of Control are suffering from unprovoked firing by India," the FM added.

The foreign minister said he was in the UAE to also discuss the evolving regional situation and the developments taking place in Afghanistan.

"Pakistan desires a peaceful, democratic and stable Afghanistan, but for that, the peace process has to be taken forward by the people of Afghanistan," he added.

Qureshi meets UAE counterpart

Foreign Minister Qureshi and his Emirati counterpart Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan had a meeting in Abu Dhabi wherein both countries reaffirmed the desire to further strengthen their bilateral relations in different fields.

They reviewed the entire gamut of bilateral relations, discussing ways to enhance cooperation in diverse areas including trade, investment, infrastructure, energy, technology, tourism and manpower.

The two diplomats also discussed ways to provide fresh impetus to existing Pakistan-UAE ties. In this regard, they agreed to facilitate Ministerial level visits from both sides

Pronouncing the decision to roll over the $2 billion provided in loan by Abu Dhabi Fund to Pakistan, the UAE's FM affirmed his country's commitment to extend every possible support to Pakistan.

Foreign Minister Qureshi outlined his plans for showcasing the history and the future potential of Pakistan-UAE cooperation at EXPO 2020 Dubai to be held in October this year.

The foreign minister also lauded the positive contribution of the Pakistani Diaspora in the UAE towards the development and progress of both countries. He emphasised the need for nurturing and strengthening people-to-people linkages, as well as removing impediments that hamper travel between the two countries.
 
Will The French Envoy Issue Derail India, Pakistan Peace Initiative Brokered By The UAE?

https://eurasiantimes.com/will-the-french-envoy-issue-derail-india-pakistan-peace-initiative-brokered-by-the-uae/

The demonstrations and violent agitations against the cartoons of Prophet Mohammed published in the French newspaper Charlie Hebdo last September created huge turmoil in France and in some Islamic countries.

However, French President Emmanuel Macron, by defending it as freedom of expression and calling it an integral part of French civil and political discourse, angered radicals in Pakistan.

This had triggered demands for a boycott of French goods, companies, and even the expulsion of the French ambassador in Pakistan. And the last week’s violent protests were the reflection of this collective rage and hate towards the European country.

To ward off an increasingly hostile domestic pressure, Prime Minister Imran Khan entered into an agreement with the TLP that talked of the government bringing a legislative resolution to expel the French Ambassador.

However, realizing the dangers of fulfilling the promise, angering the French and the European Union, and creating even more problems for Pakistan, the government went back on its word.

It arrested TLP leader Saad Rizvi and banned the outfit. Days of violence followed, the government lost its nerve, released its leader and most of the followers, 669 out of 733 arrested for violence, according to Interior Minister Sheikh Rashid.

The Imran Khan government also had to call an assembly session that ultimately led to the formation of a committee for resolution of the issue. Now, for the time being, the issue has been put on the backburner but it surely has implications for Pakistan’s economy, security as well as diplomacy.

The Pakistan government today finds itself in a Catch-22 situation. Any hostile action against France will certainly be retaliated by Paris and the EU. In any case, Pakistan rarely figures among important trading partners of Europe.

With the sword of FATF Grey/Black List hanging over its head and renegotiations for the bailout package with the IMF underway, Pakistan can hardly even think of acting tough.

To deal with this, the PTI government in Pakistan could well try to distract public opinion towards Kashmir once again. It might well raise temperatures on the alleged violations by India and even try to send its army of radicals to infiltrate into Indian territories.

A few sporadic incidents like the one of bombing in Serena Hotel in Quetta on Wednesday night could allow the shaking Pakistani establishment to bring Kashmir back into the picture again and use it for sending jihadists into India.

However, with the UAE taking the initiative to start discussions between India and Pakistan, Khan’s problems could only multiply.

While the UAE’s royal family is itself pitching in with peace overtures and the country has remained a financial patron to Pakistan for decades, PM Khan cannot really play truant with them.

He has to at least go through the motions and try to play peace to a certain extent. Media reports suggest that the February 25 India-Pakistan LOC ceasefire agreement was the first step towards peace. The second step involves the reinstatement of respective High Commissioners in both capitals. Only then, the contentious issues like Kashmir, terrorism and the rest are to be discussed.

In the given scenario, Pakistan cannot explicitly violate the ongoing peace process in the short term. While General Bajwa seems very much on board, to placate the ever-growing army of domestic jihadists, PM Khan would certainly need the help of some external sources, maybe Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and probably the US too to rein in leaders of its home-grown radicals.

Khan’s helplessness was clearly visible when the Pakistan government made a U-turn of not resuming trade ties with India, 24 hours after proposing to import sugar and cotton from its neighbor.

So how far the UAE-initiated peace process between the two neighbors moves forward will depend greatly on how this French issue is tackled in Pakistan.

In the current context with Indian borders remaining not so porous, the IMF bailout package under discussions and UAE getting involved in the complicated India-Pakistan relations, the big question is — will Pakistan once again create troubles for India, which would set it back to square one — the current state of a chaotic economic, social and diplomatic order?

A rational answer would be a big no, but then Pakistanis are unpredictable, in cricket as well as in international politics.
 
Islamabad is willing to hold formal bilateral talks with New Delhi to resolve long-standing issues including the Kashmir dispute if the latter takes certain steps to “ease lives” in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).

Highly-placed Pakistani sources familiar with the development shared with Al Jazeera a list of actions that the Indian government could take in IIOJK to create the conducive environment for the bilateral dialogue.

Ties between the nuclear-armed rivals have been on ice since Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi withdrew the semi-autonomous status of IIOJK in order to tighten his grip over the disputed territory, provoking outrage in Pakistan and the downgrading of diplomatic ties and suspension of bilateral trade.

But the two governments have re-opened a back channel of diplomacy aimed at a modest roadmap to normalising ties over the next several months, the people said.

Several reports suggested that the UAE was mediating between the two countries. There were even reports that senior intelligence officials of Pakistan and India had met in Dubai in January leading to the ceasefire between the two countries along the Line of Control (LoC).

The UAE ambassador to Washington also confirmed that his country was facilitating dialogue between Islamabad and New Delhi. The envoy said the idea behind the UAE’s effort was to ensure that Pakistan and India have a functional relationship.

“Pakistan is genuinely standing by the Kashmir cause, of course the territory is an internationally recognised dispute, but the first thing we have to do is make sure Kashmiri lives are eased,” said one source, who spoke on condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the issue.

What Pakistan wants from India

The sources gave “examples” of concrete Indian actions that could move the “communication” between the two countries forward.

First, a permanent halt to demographic change in IIOJK, where India in April 2020 introduced a new domicile law that would allow long-term migrants from other parts of the country to gain permanent residence.

“This would inevitably be necessary to move forward,” a Pakistani source said.

Second, Indian authorities would have to release political and other prisoners being illegally held since it imposed a curfew in the Muslim-majority region.

Third, the removal by India of blockades on communication and movement in the occupied region.

Fourth, giving back full statehood rights to IIOJK, which were also revoked as part of the August 2019 actions, and “recognising that it is subject to an internationally recognised territorial dispute with Pakistan”.

Fifth, a reduction in occupation forces deployment in IIOJK, where hundreds of thousands of security forces personnel have been deployed following the August 2019 imposition of lockdown after India’s Article 370 was revoked.

“The markers I have mentioned, these are what we define as ‘the enabling environment’,” said a source.

“This is the next step. Whatever conditions that India creates, must also be acceptable to the Kashmiris. Without this, it is unlikely that Pakistan can move forward.”

The second Pakistani source also said these “markers” were starting points for any further conversation.

“Let’s say that they do not do any of these things. Then that’s the end of it,” the second source said.

Arindam Bagchi, India’s foreign ministry spokesperson, declined to comment on the issue to Al Jazeera.

Zahid Hafeez Chaudhri, Pakistan foreign ministry spokesperson, did not comment on specifics of the current communication between the two countries, but repeated Islamabad’s stance that “the onus is on India” to restart talks.

“For any meaningful and result oriented dialogue, there has to be a conducive and enabling environment,” he told Al Jazeera.

Notably absent from Pakistan’s demands is the reimplementation of Article 370, which was revoked on August 5, 2019, by the Modi government.

“Article 370 […] is not our headache because we never recognised the Indian constitution’s application to Kashmir,” a Pakistani source said.

“Whether they bring 370 [back] or not … just tell us is the Kashmiri identity intact?” said the source, marking a potential softening of the country’s previous stance.

Express Tribune
 
Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said on Friday that Pakistan and India were not engaged in any "peace talks" and the United Arab Emirates was not facilitating anything.

In an interview with TRT World, Qureshi said he wanted to "correct" the host, Andrea Sanke, on her question that whether the "secret" round of peace talks between Pakistan and India being facilitated by the UAE were "showing more promise" than the peace talks in Afghanistan.

"We are not having any peace talks at the moment and the UAE is not facilitating anything," said the foreign minister. He had arrived in Istanbul on Friday for a two-day official visit to "participate in a trilateral meeting of the foreign ministers of Pakistan, Turkey and Afghanistan", according to a statement from the Foreign Office.

Qureshi said he had "seen stories about the 'role of mediation', [but] no".

“[The] UAE is a friend and it has good relations with Pakistan and India," said the foreign minister, adding that all friends had been consistently saying that the two were nuclear countries with outstanding issues who could not go to war, therefore, "the best way forward is dialogue."

"Pakistan has never shied away from dialogue. India had shied away, India took certain steps that vitiated the climate," Qureshi stated.

"Look at the statement Pakistan made, look at the statement Prime Minister Imran Khan made when he won the elections: 'You take one step towards peace, we will take two'.

"It was an olive branch because we as a government, we have a people-centric agenda. We want economic security, we want to concentrate on our economic stability and for that we need peace, we need peace with our eastern neighbour and we need peace on the western front. So talks make sense," said the foreign minister.

He stated that if India wanted to convince Pakistan that it was willing to talk then it would have to create a "conducive environment" — which it had originally vitiated by the actions taken on August 5, 2019, according to Qureshi.

He added that Kashmiris had been "snatched" of their statehood, alienated, deprived of their rights and were still in a "double lockdown". "We are facing a Covid lockdown, they are facing a Covid lockdown and they are facing a military siege."

"So how do we talk to people in that environment. Give them (Kashmiris) the relief, give them the statehood.

"Even the secular voices within India have said the Kashmir policy of the Indian government has failed, it has boomeranged [and] it has failed to achieve the objectives that were initiated when it was launched, so revisit [and] rethink," said FM Qureshi.

"If you are willing to engage, Pakistan will never shy away."

The UAE's envoy to Washington had previously confirmed that the Gulf state was mediating between India and Pakistan to help the nuclear-armed rivals reach a “healthy and functional” relationship.

Ambassador Yousef Al Otaiba had said in a virtual discussion with Stanford University's Hoover Institution that the UAE had played a role “in bringing Kashmir escalation down and created a ceasefire, hopefully ultimately leading to restoring diplomats and getting the relationship back to a healthy level”.

“They might not sort of become best friends but at least we want to get it to a level where it's functional, where it's operational, where they are speaking to each other,” he had said.

Top intelligence officers from India and Pakistan held secret talks in Dubai in January in a new effort to calm military tension over the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir, people with knowledge of the matter had told Reuters.

Ties between India and Pakistan have been frozen since a suicide bombing of an Indian military convoy in occupied Kashmir in 2019 was blamed on Pakistan, leading to India sending warplanes to Pakistan.

Later that year, India's prime minister withdrew the occupied region's autonomy in order to tighten his grip over the territory, provoking outrage in Pakistan and the downgrading of diplomatic ties and suspension of bilateral trade.

'All on the same page'
"The government, the military and the ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence), they're all on the same page and they all believe a peaceful, stable, democratic and prosperous Afghanistan is in Pakistan's interests," responded the foreign minister to a question from Sanke on how much the Pakistani government and military could do in the Afghan peace process.

"We are all trying very hard to push the peace process forward. It wouldn't have reached to where it has without Pakistan's facilitating role," he said, citing the developments of the Doha peace talks, US-Taliban agreement for withdrawal of US troops, commencement of intra-Afghan peace talks on September 12 and the agreement on the rules of procedure.

"It wouldn't have happened without Pakistan's nudging. Now they are independent people, we can [only] take them so far, ultimately decisions have to be taken by Afghans."

Sanke questioned whether the talks with the Taliban could be called negotiations and that some people referred to them as "blackmail". The foreign minister responded: "I think, in the discussions I've had with them in Islamabad [...] I realised that they have also realised that they need to engage with the rest of the world if they want acceptability and violence is not an option."

"How can you have peace and violence at the same time? That is exactly what we have been telling them [that] reduction in violence is essential [for] leading to a ceasefire," he said, adding that the Taliban were willing to work and honour their commitments.

He also said that it was a "misnomer" when people said that violence in Afghanistan was linked to the Taliban, adding that they [Taliban] could not be blamed for "all the ills in Afghanistan" because there were other terrorist organisations operating in Afghanistan such as Daesh, the banned so-called Islamic State.

"There is an element in Afghanistan who has benefitted from [the] war economy and they are spoilers (of peace)," said Qureshi. He also stated that Pakistan's influence over the Taliban was "exaggerated" and they knew where their interests laid.

"We have been engaging with them because we felt they have a say in Afghanistan and the world has realised after two decades of fights that you cannot have peace until and unless you bring them into the mainstream."

Sanke asked the foreign minister whether he potentially saw a situation where terrorist organisations like Daesh and Al Qaeda stepped in to start working with the Taliban and it went from "bad to worse".

"We are no supporters of Daesh [and] we are no supporters of Al Qaeda. In fact we do not want any terrorist organisation to gain a foothold in the region to cause harm to neighbours and beyond," stated Qureshi. He pointed out that Pakistan had "cleansed" its own areas and started border fencing for more regulation and better border management.

"Have you cleansed your areas? You just had an attack on the most important luxury hotel in Quetta," Sanke pushed back, adding that the attack had been claimed by the outlawed Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

"The point is, where are they located? where is the TTP located today?" responded Qureshi, adding that the border with Afghanistan was fluid and had been so for "centuries".

"We are now managing it and we have managed it a lot better. Hopefully once the fencing is complete — we are 90 per cent there — we will be able to moderate it in a better way."

'Incidents of terrorism have declined sharply'
When asked if allowing the Taliban back into power would "embolden existing extremist groups in Pakistan", The foreign minister said "terrorists are terrorists" and that applied everywhere. They would take advantage of the situation but "I think if you look at the incidents of terrorism, they have declined sharply".

Sanke pushed back that the decrease in the incidents of terrorism was seen in Pakistan but not in Afghanistan. Qureshi responded that they had not reduced to the extent they should have in Afghanistan and that is why Pakistan had been advocate of "sit and talk".

When questioned what kind of example did recognising the Taliban as a political party set and whether it amounted to rewarding extremism, the foreign minister responded: "How can we reward any terrorist element?"

He said Pakistan had lost 83,000 lives to terrorism and had paid a "huge economic price".

"Do you think we want 'Talibanisation' of Pakistan? [...] Do you think that we would want to impose a way of life which is not acceptable to us in Afghanistan? Do you think we would want to promote extremism and an extremist ideology in Afghanistan?

"Afghanistan is democratic today. Women in Afghanistan have a role and you cannot lock them in and cage them anymore. Girls want to go to school and that should be respected," he said, adding that the Taliban would have to accept the new reality of Afghanistan and "move from the bullet to the ballot".

"What happens when a democratic Afghanistan goes to elections and the voters choose not to recognise the Taliban in any government. Do you think they will respect that?" questioned Sanke.

"The Taliban claim they are popular in the people. Why don't they test their popularity at the ballot box and if the people of Afghanistan do not vote them in, we would respect that," responded the foreign minister, adding that they should be given the opportunity to change.

"Will they respect that?" Sanke asked again, to which Qureshi responded that the Taliban ought to.

"Even irrational elements have to respect public opinion. Don't you think there are irrational people all over the world, but the majority leads the way," Qureshi said.

"You are very much betting that this is a leopard that can change its spots," Sanke stated.

The foreign minister said according to him, there was no other way and the world was now tired, fatigued and suffering from the Covid-19 pandemic.

"They have said we have done our bit, now it's [time] for you Afghans to play your role [...] the rest the Afghans have to decide. What kind of government they want, what kind of political dispensation they want, who are we to tell them?"

He said the notion of Afghanistan descending back into civil war "concerns me and should concern Pakistan because we want a stable, peaceful Afghanistan". Qureshi said that Pakistan had also suffered and was supporting three million Afghan refugees.

"There could be spoilers outside Afghanistan who feel peace is not good for them. They have their own national objectives. They don't have regional objectives which is peace and tranquility," he retorted to a question about some people saying the Taliban didn't believe peace to be good for them.

Sanke also questioned the foreign minister on the role of Turkey in the Afghan peace process and whether it was "fundamental in moving this process forward".

"Turkey is an important player. Turkey has influence in the region and substantial influence in Afghanistan and we are thankful to Turkey for playing that role to begin with," responded Qureshi.

He said it was time for Afghans to decide whether "do they want to keep killing each other, do they want to remain untouchables vis a vis the rest of the world or do they want respectability. The world has done everything possible for them."

"Look at the donor conferences. Look at the money that has been pumped into Afghanistan and look at the way that money has been utilised and at times misutilised [and] gone into people's pockets.

"Let's be honest about it. I'm being very candid and I'm doing it because I'm a friend of Afghanistan. I believe in a peaceful, stable and friendly Afghanistan," said the foreign minister.

He said he had well wishes for the country and emphasised that and not just the Taliban, but elements in the Afghan government would have to realise that engagements and negotiations across the table would be slow and a "bumpy ride".

"But you will have to persevere and you will have to be patient."
 
https://www.dawn.com/news/1620230/indian-offer-led-to-quiet-talks-on-all-major-issues

India appro*ached Pakistan in December 2020 with an offer to reduce tension and offered backchannel talks on all outstanding issues, including Jammu and Kashmir, and Pakistan reciprocated favourably, fresh inf*ormation emanating from official quarters has confirmed.

The Indian offer was discussed among the top Pakistan leadership and a decision was taken to explore all avenues for a peaceful settlement of conflicts by engaging in quiet talks, according to high-level official sources.

India proposed that the two countries start talking on all outstanding issues side by side instead of lumping them together in a composite dialogue, said the sources. The Pakistani leadership has agreed to explore all options that can lead to lowering of tension.

“It is an opportune time for us to take a strategic pause,” says an official. “We need a break from the cycle of violence and focus on domestic issues.”

For the two South Asian neighbours that nearly went to war in 2019, the recent moves constitute a major policy initiative towards normalisation of ties. They also reflect the changing dynamics in Islamabad and New Delhi whereby those advocating greater engagement have begun to dominate those people who espoused a hardline and hawkish approach within decision-making circles.

The backchannel talks, sources confirm, are being held between the intelligence leaderships of the two countries. Sources say New Delhi had preferred that these quiet negotiations take place at this level instead of through a political platform, and Islamabad had consented.

Officials now acknowledge that Pakistan’s primary interest at this initial stage is that Occupied Kashmir gets back its statehood and India agrees not to bring about any demographic changes in the disputed territory. Both governments have agreed not to involve any third party in this initiative for now.

There appears to be a newfound clarity in the Pakistani leadership about pushing for a fresh round of engagement with India after a dangerous round of hostilities. Accordingly, Pakistan seems willing to explore outstanding issues separately in a bid to resolve whichever conflicts present agreeable solutions. The Sir Creek dispute may be one such ‘low-hanging fruit’. Officials argue that both Pakistan and India have pursued direct and indirect policies to resolve the Kashmir issue and have failed. “Isn’t it time we go back to the drawing board and try to find a new strategy,” asks an official. “The path of dialogue will be bumpy, but if we stay the course we can reach our objectives,” he says.

The backchannel dialogue hit a bump recently when the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the federal cabinet announced a decision to allow import of sugar and wheat from India, only for the cabinet to not approve the decision the next day when some members, including Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, opposed the move. Sources now believe this confusion had an adverse impact on the quiet dialogue and the government was pressured into adopting a tough stance. However, the sources say the ‘bump’ is a temporary one.

New information suggests that initial backchannel contacts between Pakistan and India took place in 2017. According to sources, relevant senior Indian officials had conveyed a quiet message to the Pakistani intelligence and military leadership to initiate a dialogue. The-then prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi gave the go-ahead for this backchannel contact which then continued at a gradual pace.

However, it was in December last year that the talks went into higher gear. Since then, a number of confidence-building measures have taken place, including a ceasefire agreement on the Line of Control (LoC) that divides Azad Kashmir and Occupied Kashmir.

The Pakistani civil and military leadership is said to be on the same page on the latest engagement with India. While in the past, the military had its disagreements with the elected leadership on policies with India, officials now say that the military high command wants a greater push for peace in South Asia.

“War has never produced a solution and two nuclear powers cannot afford a conflict,” says an official. He argues that the military leadership will not be an obstacle to peace because war is not an option now.

There is a major rethink within the Pakistani leadership amid a greater preference for what is termed “strategic patience”. This policy is based on a realisation that ‘active borders’ (as well as the LoC) that witness constant low-level conflict are a major drain on the economy at a time when Pakistan needs to strengthen its financial muscles. The rethink that is slowly becoming evident now has been ‘ongoing’ for a number of years. It has generated various quiet initiatives including, as per sources, a change in the curriculum of the military war college to reflect changing regional dynamics.

Highly placed officials argue that India is investing in this fresh engagement with Pakistan because it is faced with a two-front situation on its western and northern borders. As a result, it has had to move a significant number of its forces deployed on the western front to the northern one with China. After this re-deployment, Pakistani intelligence officials estimate that the ratio of Indian to Pakistan forces deployed against each other has, for the first time, come down to 1:1. Pakistan’s assessment is that under the BJP government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India would be better prepared for improved ties with Pakistan.

The logic weaving through this rethink is grounded in Pakistan’s need to prioritise the economy and other domestic issues that require external and internal stability. Officials argue that Pakistan today needs to focus on issues like health, education, infrastructure and population control instead of being stuck in a confrontational situation on the borders. “We cannot remain at loggerheads forever,” states one official.

There is a renewed effort in key official quarters to move beyond rigid policies of the past. “If we keep scratching away at history,” says a source, “we will keep reopening old wounds.” Many argue today that if we remain hostage to the mistakes of the past, it will be impossible to move forward.

This is why there is an admission that Pakistan should focus on ensuring the people of Occupied Kashmir, who continue to undergo pain and hardship, are provided relief. “At times, one step back can lead to two steps forward,” says an official.

Officials argue that Pakistan will hold on firmly to its official positions while engaging with India. They say it is important at this point to sit across the table even if the positions are poles apart. Only through constantly talking to each other can we reduce the gap between our positions, they believe.

The strategic rethink within the Pakistani leadership has also led to a deliberate policy of jettisoning militant organisations and dismantling their networks. Pakistan has also taken specific and concrete measures to combat terror financing and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has acknowledged that Pakistan has successfully completed 24 of the 27 requirements to come off its grey list. The FATF framework has helped Pakistan push through systemic reforms, legislate stringent measures and build the capacity of state institutions to throttle terror financing and money laundering.

“We are moving away from the ‘jihadi’ culture,” admits an official source. “Anyone that the state cannot control is not an asset, he is a liability.” Officials emphasise that the state wants to eradicate militancy from society and make Pakistan a ‘normal’ state.

Sources say the Pakistani leadership is now firmly committed to resolving conflicts and achieving normalisation in the region. The leadership is resolved to not step back at any cost, they say. “The Pakistan-India conflict has become a ‘saas-bahu kee larai’ (mother-in-law and daughter-in-law fight) that should end,” says a senior official.
 
Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi has said Islamabad is ready to resolve differences with New Delhi through dialogue if it revisits unilateral abrogation of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir's (IIOJK) semi-autonomous status.

“If India is willing to re-visit some of the decisions that they took on August 5, 2019, Pakistan will be more than happy to engage, sit and talk out our differences and sit and through a dialogue resolve the outstanding issues,” he said on Sunday in an interview with Anadolu Agency during his two-day visit to Turkey.

He said Pakistan had outstanding issues with India including Kashmir, Siachen, Sir Creek and others and the only sensible way forward is the dialogue.

“We cannot afford to go to war, you know, it will be mutually suicidal. And no sensible person will advocate a policy of that nature. So, we need to sit and we need to talk.”

FM Qureshi said it was India, not Pakistan, who ran away from talks and suspended the composite and comprehensive dialogue.

He said the Indian unilateral actions of August 5, 2019 were against international law, United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions thereby putting at risk, stability and peace of South Asia.

However, he said, one recent development of recommitment to ceasefire during the conversation between the directors general of military operations from both sides was a positive development.

“So, when they expressed an interest in recommitment, we welcomed it. Kashmiris have welcomed it. And that has, in my view, lowered tensions and has gone well on both sides. Sensible elements on this site and on that side have welcomed this new development.”

Moreover, he also referred to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messages on Pakistan’s national day and a goodwill message to Prime Minister Imran Khan who also responded positively to it.

“So, there is some thought. It is too early to make a value judgment on that,” he remarked.

Coming to Afghan peace process, Qureshi said stakes in the process are very high.

“The stakes are high, simply for the reason that God forbid, if there is no agreement, if there is no political settlement, the fear of going back into the 90s, the fear of Afghanistan going into a civil war is looming over our heads. And that is the last thing anyone of us wants. And that is the last thing Pakistan wants.”

Regarding the US’ decision of troops withdrawal from Afghanistan, the foreign minister said that it was one of the very important demands of the Taliban during the negotiations. “So, by withdrawing, the Americans have conceded to that demand,” he added.

“We will certainly try and urge them (Taliban), you know, we will urge them to remain engaged and continue with the peace process, the process that started in Doha, should come to a logical conclusion through the Istanbul conference,” Qureshi remarked.

To another question, the foreign minister said Pakistan could take advantage of its geopolitical position for generating economic activity and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Pakistan is providing a huge opportunity to landlocked countries like Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics.

“And we want to create a win-win situation so that everybody gains from it. You know, China gains from it, Russia gains from it, Central Asian republics gain from it, and the entire region benefits from this, and it’s not confined to just the region,” he said.

Moreover, anyone including the western countries, United States or European Union interested in coming and investing in these areas would be welcomed.

As the questioner asked as what were the obstacles Afghan parties needed to overcome, the foreign minister said the Afghans should seize opportunity for peace and decide via consultation what kind of a constitution they want for their country.

He said being a neighbour, Pakistan could only help and facilitate and not make any decisions.

However, cautioning against the role of spoilers, Qureshi said there were elements that had benefited from the war economy.

“People have made billions and there are elements outside of Afghanistan who would want Afghanistan to remain unstable because of the use of Afghan soil for their national objectives. So, recognising that there are spoilers, we also recognise there is a huge opportunity, which should not be missed.”

Touching the bilateral relations, the foreign minister thanked Turkey for standing up for the cause of the Kashmiris by taking a very clear position.

Moreover, the views of President Erdogan were very close to the views of Prime Minister Imran Khan on the issue of Islamophobia. He said both Turkey and Iran were onboard and would speak to Indonesian foreign minister soon to seek her advice and opinion.

“InshaAllah, in the month of Ramazan, when I accompany the prime minister [Imran Khan] to Saudi Arabia, I intend to take up this issue with the foreign minister of Saudi Arabia, so that important Muslim countries, build a consensus within the Ummah and then engage with the West, on how to tackle the issue of Islamophobia,” he added.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2296683/happy-to-talk-out-any-differences-with-india-qureshi
 
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2298229/india-violates-border-truce-after-over-two-months

India has violated the ceasefire along the Working Boundary, the first time since the two countries agreed to restore the truce on February 25, the Foreign Office confirmed on Tuesday.

The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) violated the ceasefire at the Charwa Sector of the Working Boundary on Monday, foriegn office spokesperson Zahid Hafiz Chaudhri said.

The spokesperson confirmed that the Indian Charge d'Affaires was called to the Foreign Office to lodge a protest against the violation.

"The Indian side was reminded of its obligation to respect the ceasefire understanding," he added. But unlike the past, the foreign office tried to downplay the incident as no formal statement was issued. Instead, the spokesperson responded to media queries.

Tensions between Pakistan and India have eased considerably along the LoC after the two countries decided to honour the 2003 ceasefire understanding in February.

Since then, the LoC and the border remain calm as there has not been a single incident of ceasefire violation until the latest one.

The truce violation at the Working Boundary caused no casualties. The de-escalation in tensions were attributed to backchannel talks between the senior intelligence officials of Pakistan and India.

The backchannel talks were confirmed by a high official in a recent interaction with journalists. But retired diplomats and generals warned against being too optimistic about these contacts as New Delhi has yet to give any positive signal. Pakistan is hoping that Modi government would take steps, particularly with regard to the situation in Occupied Kashmir in order to create a conducive environment for further engagement.

Tensions between the two countries had been simmering after India revoked the special status of the disputed territory of Kashmir.

Pakistani officials said its main area of concern was not Article 370 but 35 A that barred non-Kashmiris from becoming citizens of the disputed territory.

Pakistan was told by India through backchannels that some announcement could be made on the issue.

But many observers are skeptical that Indian Prime Minister Modi would reverse August 5, 2019 actions since doing that would invite strong public backlash.
 
Pakistan is missing a trick here. It should put pressure on the borders - Modi sarkar is already struggling to deal with COVID and has just lost a major election, now is the time to pile on the misery.
 
Pakistan is missing a trick here. It should put pressure on the borders - Modi sarkar is already struggling to deal with COVID and has just lost a major election, now is the time to pile on the misery.

Just like in the Kargil War?
 
Pakistan is missing a trick here. It should put pressure on the borders - Modi sarkar is already struggling to deal with COVID and has just lost a major election, now is the time to pile on the misery.
Thats the best distraction And favor
Modi can hope in current scenario. So thanks but no thanks.
 
Pakistan is missing a trick here. It should put pressure on the borders - Modi sarkar is already struggling to deal with COVID and has just lost a major election, now is the time to pile on the misery.

Not sure what would be the point of such a move.

That the best time to attack your enemy country is when it's dealing with a humanitarian crisis?

And like the above poster said, that would be the dream come true for the BJP in the current situation.
 
Last edited:
Nothing about Jammu & Kashmir India's internal matter: Qureshi

Foreign minister says final settlement on IIOJK lies with UNSC calling for free, impartial plebiscite

ISLAMABAD:
Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said on Monday that the final settlement of the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) dispute lies in the United Nations Security Council's (UNSC) resolution calling for a free and impartial plebiscite under the UN auspices.

"Let me be clear, Jammu & Kashmir is an internationally recognised dispute on the UN Security Council agenda," the foreign minister said on Twitter, adding that IIOJK was not India's internal matter.

Let me be clear: Jammu & Kashmir is an internationally recognised dispute on the @UN Security Council agenda. Final settlement of the dispute lies in #UNSC resolution calling for free and impartial plebiscite under UN auspices. Nothing about J&K can be India’s internal matter.
— Shah Mahmood Qureshi

In April, the foreign minister said that dialogue between Pakistan and India would only take place if the situation in IIOJK improves.

"Kashmir is not bilateral; rather an internationally recognised issue as there are numerous UN Security Council resolutions on it," FM Qureshi said in an interview with Khaleej Times.

The foreign minister added that if India and Pakistan want lasting peace in South Asia, they would have to discuss the IIOJK issue to find a resolution according to the aspirations of the Kashmiri people, as the issue cannot be put on the back burner.

Read 'Pakistan, India held secret talks to break Kashmir impasse'

Qureshi maintained that Pakistan was comfortable with the role the UAE can play to improve relations between India and Pakistan.

"We want to move ahead, but in order to get there, India, which is responsible for vitiating the environment will have to create a conducive and enabling environment, for the dialogue to take place," he added.

Qureshi said Pakistan would appreciate anyone and everyone including UAE to play a positive and constructive role, but the initiative will have to be indigenous.

"There have been some positive developments, as India says it wants to see a peaceful Afghanistan and region but Kashmiris on both sides of the Line of Control are suffering from unprovoked firing by India," the FM added.

The foreign minister said he was in the UAE to also discuss the evolving regional situation and the developments taking place in Afghanistan.

"Pakistan desires a peaceful, democratic and stable Afghanistan, but for that, the peace process has to be taken forward by the people of Afghanistan," he added.


https://tribune.com.pk/story/2299202/nothing-about-jammu-kashmir-indias-internal-matter-qureshi
 
Jammu (Jammu and Kashmir) [India], May 13 (ANI): A day before the festival, the Indian Army and Pakistan Army celebrated Eid-Ul-Fitr on the Line of Control (LoC) at Poonch-Rawalakot Crossing Point and Mendhar-Hotspring Crossing Point in Poonch district of Jammu and Kashmir on Thursday.

Armies of both the countries exchanged sweets and compliments with the representatives of their counterpart in an atmosphere of bonhomie and festivities.

The Indian Army in a statement said the ceremony is seen as a confidence-building measure in the backdrop of the recently agreed ceasefire between the two countries.

"The gesture was appreciated by both the armies and is expected to promote goodwill and mutual trust," the Army said. (ANI)
 
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/loc-truce-led-to-sense-of-peace-army-chief-101622312372695.html

Army chief General Manoj Mukund Naravane has said that the restoration of ceasefire in February between Indian and Pakistani militaries along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir is holding, has led to a significant drop in infiltration by terrorists from Pakistan and contributed to the overall sense of peace and well-being in border areas.

“This is the first step on the long road to normalisation of ties between the two countries. We would like the ceasefire to continue. It has definitely led to an improvement in the security situation and benefited civilians living in forward areas,” Naravane said.

In a surprise development, Indian and Pakistani militaries announced on February 25 that they had begun observing a ceasefire along the LoC from the midnight of February 24. India and Pakistan had agreed to a ceasefire on the LoC in November 2003, but it was frequently violated.

The army chief said the ceasefire violations by the neighbouring army were aimed at providing cover to infiltrators. No ceasefire violations by the Pakistan army indicated that infiltration attempts were not being supported, Naravane said.

“Counterterrorism operations will continue. We have no reason to believe that terror infrastructure along the LoC has been dismantled by the Pakistan army,” Naravane said.

Pakistan resorted to the highest ever ceasefire violations during the 12 months preceding the joint announcement of the ceasefire in February. According to government data accessed by HT, the Pakistani army violated ceasefire at least a dozen times on average daily between February 2020 and February 2021.

Peace along the LoC is mutually beneficial, Naravane said. “The population living on either side suffers due to violence along the LoC. I am sure the Pakistan army is also concerned about the population and hopefully the ceasefire will hold,” the army chief said.

After February 24, there has been a solitary instance of cross-border firing along the international border in Jammu sector between the Border Security Force and Pakistan Rangers.

Of the 30 terrorists killed by security forces in Kashmir during the last three months, only one was a foreigner, said officials familiar with the developments. “It’s an indicator that infiltration by Pakistani terrorists has dropped notably. We will have to wait and watch how things unfold as three months is a short window to confirm a pattern,” said one of the officials.

The escalation in ceasefire violations coincided with the first anniversary of the Centre’s move in August 2019 to strip Jammu and Kashmir of its semi-autonomous status that Islamabad reacted sharply to.
 
https://www.dawn.com/news/1626579/normalising-relations-with-india-at-present-would-be-a-major-betrayal-to-kashmiris-pm-imran

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Sunday said Pakistan could not improve its trade with India at the cost of the blood of the Kashmiris spilt by India, stressing that any normalisation with New Delhi under the current circumstances would be a major "betrayal" to the people of the occupied territory.

Interacting with the public in a live Q&A session, the premier said there was "no doubt" that the benefits would be immense if relations with India improved and trade and connectivity started, citing examples from other parts of the world such as the formation of the European Union which he said had benefitted all member countries.

"I tried since the first day after coming into power that we have [friendly] relations with India and the issue of Kashmir is resolved through dialogue but [considering] the situation right now, if we normalise relations with India at this time we will be doing a major betrayal with the people of Kashmir," Imran said.

He added that re-establishing ties at the moment would be tantamount to "ignoring all their struggle and the more than 100,000 Kashmiris martyred".

"There is no doubt that our trade will improve but all their blood will be wasted, so this cannot happen," the prime minister emphasised, saying Pakistan stood with the Kashmiris and was aware of the kind of sacrifices they had given and were giving.

"So this cannot happen that our trade improves at [the cost of] their blood," he said.

The premier added that talks could be had and a roadmap to solve the Kashmir issue could be devised if India took back its actions of August 5, 2019.

India had repealed Article 370 of its constitution on Aug 5 that year and thus revoked occupied Kashmir's special autonomy. Pakistan had subsequently downgraded its diplomatic relations with India and then suspended bilateral trade with it.

United Nations General Assembly President Volkan Bozkir, during his recent visit to Islamabad, had called on all parties to refrain from changing the status of Jammu and Kashmir and said a solution was to be found through peaceful means in accordance with the UN Charter and UN Security Council resolutions as agreed in the Simla Agreement between Pakistan and India.

He had also said that it was Pakistan's duty to bring the issue of Jammu and Kashmir to the UN platform with more vigour.

Speaking about the Palestine issue, Prime Minister Imran said it was similar to the Kashmir conflict.

He said there were only two end results to the issue: either a type of "ethnic cleansing" similar to that seen in Spain of Muslims and Jews, which he said couldn't happen due to the world's attention and increasing awareness about the issue, or a two-state solution.

"I think the kind of awareness and movement which have started in the international media and the world will take the Palestinians towards a two-state solution."
 
Terrorists Working With Pak Army Can Escalate Situation: General Rawat

General Bipin Rawat stated that while there was a need to be alert on both the borders, primary front for the defence forces at the moment was the Northern border where India and China have been locked in a military standoff since last year.


New Delhi: Asking armed forces to be on guard along borders with both China and Pakistan, Chief of Defence Staff General Bipin Rawat has said that terrorists working with the Pakistan Army can go rogue and it could escalate the situation with India.
Speaking to ANI on Tuesday, the Chief of Defence Staff also stated that while there was a need to be alert on both the borders, the primary front for the defence forces at the moment was the Northern border where India and China have been locked in a military standoff since last year.

"I would say both the fronts are a priority for us. While we have to prepared at the northern fronts especially after the situation that evolved in 2020, We can't lower our guard but on the western front."

"I have always maintained that there are terrorists who operate with the Pakistani armed forces, some of these terrorists can actually become loose cannon and create a situation which could lead to an escalation. So we have to be fully prepared on our western fronts also. So I would say that we should be prepared for both the fronts but our primary front remains the northern front," Gen Rawat said when asked who is the main adversary for the Indian defence forces between China and Pakistan.

Asked about the deployment of two-strike corps on the China front in last one year, he said this was about reorientation of the forces which have been getting dual tasks for several years now and they were not new raisings.

On Pakistan's support for terror activities inside India, the CDS said while the ceasefire is holding along Line of Control (LoC) so far, the internal peace process is being disrupted by infiltration of weapons and drugs, using drones.

Gen Rawat said if the internal peace process is disrupted by the smuggling of drugs and weapons, then "we can't really say that the ceasefire is holding".

"Ceasefire so far along the LoC is holding, which is a positive sign. At the same time, we are also witnessing infiltration of weapons and ammunition, using drones. It doesn't augur well for peace as these drugs and weapons are meant to disrupt the internal peace process," he said.

"If the internal peace process is disrupted, then we can't really say that the ceasefire is holding. The ceasefire doesn't mean that you ceasefire along borders, but you at the same time create trouble in the hinterland. We would like a semblance of peace in the entire Jammu and Kashmir," the CDS added.

Speaking on theaterisation of forces, General Rawat said that the process is going on well and it is making satisfactory progress.

"Amongst the three services, we have been able to resolve most of the issues. There is a better understanding that if the three services integrate, they can bring about jointness and carry out transformation. Then I think, we will ensure better efficiency and utilisation of our existing services. I think we'll be better prepared for combat in the future," he said.

Shedding light on the internal situation in Jammu and Kashmir, the CDS said he is "very confident" that the people of the Union Territory want peace.

"They have seen a lot of terrorism and insurgency over the years. People are now looking at peace returning, especially after the abrogation of Article 370. If this continues, the time will come when people themselves will shun violence and will not allow insurgency in the Valley because insurgency and terrorism can't survive without the support of locals," General Rawat said.

He further said that Army needs to identify the youth in the Valley who have been misled and guide them away from terrorism.

"Some of the youth who have been misled, I think we need to identify them and see how best we can converse with them and explain to them that terrorism is not the way forward, but peace and tranquillity is the way forward," CDS Rawat added.

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/general-bipin-rawat-terrorists-working-with-pakistan-army-can-escalate-situation-2470348
 
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2308296/pakistan-india-exchange-list-of-prisoners-1

Pakistan and India on Thursday exchanged lists of their nationals incarcerated in each other’s jails, a statement issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said.

Pakistan shared with the Indian High Commission in Islamabad a list of 609 Indian prisoners which include 51 civilians and 558 fishermen, it added.

Similarly, the statement said, the government of India simultaneously shared the list of 345 Pakistani prisoners in India which include 271 civilians and 74 fishermen with the High Commission for Pakistan in New Delhi.

​"The step is consistent with the clause (i) of the Agreement on Consular Access between Pakistan and India, signed on 21st May 2008, under which both countries are required to exchange lists of prisoners in each other’s custody twice a year, on 1st January and 1st July, respectively," the official communique further said.

The pact does not include prisoners held on charges of espionage or other military-related offences.

On January 1, 2021, Pakistan shared a list of 319 Indian prisoners currently held in the country, which include 49 civilians and 270 fishermen with the Indian High Commission in the federal capital.

The Indian government had also simultaneously shared the list of 340 Pakistani prisoners in India, which include 263 civilians and 77 fishermen with the High Commission for Pakistan in New Delhi.
 
Back
Top