cricketjoshila
ODI Captain
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Runs
- 46,842
- Post of the Week
- 1
They can win a series at home if they stop caring about Babar Azam's avg.First win a series at home
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
They can win a series at home if they stop caring about Babar Azam's avg.First win a series at home
They can win a series at home if they stop caring about Babar Azam's avg.
Blasphemy!!!Babar, Shaheen and Rizwan have cost Pakistan cricket far more than they have contributed.
That is because there is a greater population of Pakistanis in Perth compared to Carribeans so they will sell more tickets and make more money.The Western Australia government specifically demanded to host Pakistan in Perth instead of the West Indies
But sadly, our own countrymen have made it a hobby mocking the cricket team any chance they get
Babar and Rizwan yes.Babar, Shaheen and Rizwan have cost Pakistan cricket far more than they have contributed.
More 3-day tests matches and embarrassments coming up...
oh plz forgive us alljust stick with Babar and focus on resource,
You mean 36 year old. You’re a liar.39 year old Sarfraz likely to be captain, another bad decision by PCB for Test cricket just stick with Babar and focus on resource, what talent pool we have who will be the fast bowlers for Aus tour, bar SSA we have a rookie attack, debutant thrown in for every series
How many times have we read this script over the years?I don’t wish to sound rude, but I am baffled at the absolute obsession with the 50 over World Cup when Pakistan has a Blue Riband Test Tour to Australia that starts almost immediately afterwards.
Pakistan is very well placed in the World Test Championship. They are unbeaten and have already won one of their 3 away series, and are due to tour South Africa in 15 months, which is a very winnable prospect because of South Africa’s lack of any international class batsmen. They have home series against Bangladesh, West Indies and an England team with no spinners.
So the Australian tour holds the key. If Pakistan can win one of the 3 Tests, they are brilliantly placed for the World Test Championship Final.
The same formula always seems to go wrong for Pakistan in Australia.
In 5 Tests in Australia across the last 2 tours, Yasir Shah took 12 wickets at an average of 89.50, with a strike rate of 114 and an economy of 4.19.
- They pick quick bowlers who are neither tall enough nor quick enough for the conditions,
- They don’t pick batsmen who have done well before in Australia or South Africa.
- They overbowl a leggie (Abdul Qadir in 83-84, Mushtaq in 99-00, Yasir Shah in 16-17 and 19-20) as a specialist spinner instead of picking a fourth quick, and watch him get tonked.
In similar conditions in South Africa in 2018-19, Yasir Shah played 2 Tests and Shadab Khan played 1.
Shadab averaged 52 with the bat while Yasir Shah averaged 3.50.
Shadab took 4 wickets in 1 Test at an average of 20.00, while Yasir Shah took 1 wicket in 2 Tests at an average of 123.00.
This time there is no excuse.
1. Pakistan need to pack their batting with all-rounders who shorten the tail.
2. Pakistan need to pick 4 quick bowlers – BUT
a) one of the quicks needs to bat at 8 and average 30 with the bat.
b) one of the quicks needs to bat at 9 and average 20 with the bat.
c) one of the quicks must be very tall and
d) one of the quicks must be very fast.
3. Pakistan need to accept that 2 part-time spinners who can bat will deliver more with both bat and ball than 1 specialist spinner who can’t bat.
(Consider the success of Washington Sundar in Australia. He was the difference between winning or losing the series.)
4. Pakistan also need to accept that Sarfraz Ahmed doesn’t leave enough balls outside off-stump to thrive in Australia.
5. Pakistan need to recognise that the three best batsmen last time they toured Australia were Babar Azam, Mohammad Rizwan and Shan Masood.
I’m not sure that Naseem Shah will be as big a loss as he would have been elsewhere. Bowlers his height rarely succeed in Australia, and three short right-arm quicks in the team would be too many.
In other words, the team probably needs to look something like:
1. Abdullah Shafique
2. Shan Masood or Imam-ul-Haq
3. Mohammad Rizwan (wk)
4. Babar Azam
5. Saud Shakeel
6. Agha Salman
7. Shadab Khan
8. Faheem Ashraf
9. Hasan Ali or Mohammad Amir (I'd prefer Mohammad Waseem Jr for his height and pace though)
10. Haris Rauf
11. Shaheen Shah Afridi
The idea of this team is for the spinners to only bowl around 3 overs each per session, with the 3 slower quicks (Shaheen, Hasan Ali and Faheem) bowling a 6 over spell every session and Haris Rauf bowling a single, very fast spell of 4 overs per session.
This is a team designed for Australian conditions. The only thing missing is a right-arm quick of at least 6’2 in height, given that Mohammad Waseem jr probably isn't refined enough yet with bat or ball to play tests in Australia.
I'll always have expectations from Shaheen, but with the proviso that he is fully fit.Brace yourself for utter humiliation.
Shaheen
Naseem
Hasan Ali
These bowlers are absolute trash in Tests. We overhype Shaheen and Naseem too much based on T20s, but they’re absolute minnow level in the premier format.
Compare with Ind attack - Bumrah is a legend in Tests, absolutely dismantled Australia in Australia which even our legends like Wasim, Waqar and Akhtar couldn’t do.
We just don’t have the talent for Tests.
Mir hamza will be torture on those pitchesIdeally, it would be Shaheen, Naseem, Hasan, Ihsanullah and Mir Hamza.
These are excellent decisions. Personally, I have been wanting Mir Hamza to play ODIs for a while. He is a beautiful action bowler that bowls excellent Test line & length like Amir. He will be a good addition to add professionalism to our bowling lineup. I really like Mir Hamza’s bowling.Need a factory reset in all facets of our cricket and that includes our test bowling line up. Other than Abrar, the rest have been below international standard and as such the PCB should implement a selection criteria which has players needing to have a minimum of two years first class experience before debuting
Anwways this is who I'd go for
1. Mir Hamza
2. Abrar Ahmed
3. Shahnawaz Dahani
4. Shaheen Afridi/ Mohammad Amir (if he is willing to return)
I was a vocal supporter of Fakhar in the test XI, back in the day.
Just thinking out loud, what harm will there be if Fakhar plays all 6 innings in Australia. Who knows he might just win us a game.
Ihsanullah coming back from injury should be eased in through LOIsI'd open with him or possibly no 6.
Fakhar
Shafique
Babar
Saud
Rizwan
Agha
Jamal
Wasim Jr
Hasan Ali
Shaheen
Ihsanullah
No experience and I'll be 3-0 but our best shot.
Ihsanullah coming back from injury should be eased in through LOIs
Pakistani bowling has gone missing in Aus tours. Batting has done reasonably well there in recent times. I don't remember Pakistan bowling well in entire series in Aus any time.
Now batting can do better and draw some games in Aus by batting big. So they have room to improve as well. Trick in Aus is to not allow Aus batsmen to score freely by searching for magic delivery. Keep bowling in right channels and let them take risk if they want to score fast. If you allow Aus to score freely even for 1 session then match gets done and dusted.
I think inexperienced bowling sides go to Aus and get excited to see bounce. Bowl too short and Aus just scores freely.Yeah England 2010, India last 2 tours have shown the way.
Oh dear, can't wait for this series. Australia will be 600/2 declared at the end of day 2.
It doesn't matter even if you lose the series. Playing against top teams will help improve the players' ability. This is where Pakistan needs to focus, play regularly against quality teams rather than playing against minnow teams.who do you think pak should consider for the aus tour?
i see a big humiliation coming our way on this coming Australian tour unfortunately
I'd open with him or possibly no 6.
Fakhar
Shafique
Babar
Saud
Rizwan
Agha
Jamal
Wasim Jr
Hasan Ali
Shaheen
Ihsanullah
No experience and I'll be 3-0 but our best shot.
Can’t have to short bowlers ( Hassan & Wasim) for an Australian tour. You need tall bowlers that can bend their back and extract appreciable bounce. Short bowlers will never be successful in Australia.
I agree. He is slow and docile but picks up bags of wickets in FC so that is worth something. I don’t know who else to go for. Mo Abbas, who is even slower and shorter?Mir hamza will be torture on those pitches
Options are thin. Pick a slow steady bowler who can restrict Aussies at 3 runs an over, or pick a fast inexperienced pacer who would be erratic and will breakdown half way through a test match. I think we need a mix.I agree. He is slow and docile but picks up bags of wickets in FC so that is worth something. I don’t know who else to go for. Mo Abbas, who is even slower and shorter?
I also like Mohammad Abbas as he has nothing to lose by having a tough series at this stage of his career and a defensive option makes sense for Australia.Options are thin. Pick a slow steady bowler who can restrict Aussies at 3 runs an over, or pick a fast inexperienced pacer who would be erratic and will breakdown half way through a test match. I think we need a mix.
I would personally pick M Abbass as one of the pacer.
Mir Hamza dominated FC cricket in an era where even Hammad Azam averaged close to 20 with the ball. The stats in our QeA trophy translate little to international cricket so we need more reason to pick someone.I agree. He is slow and docile but picks up bags of wickets in FC so that is worth something. I don’t know who else to go for. Mo Abbas, who is even slower and shorter?
is naseem gonna be fit when the time comes
On what basis will these bowlers be effective in Australia?Has to be
Shaheen
Naseem
Hassan
Ihsan
Hasnain
Rauf
Don’t think anyone else can bowl on those pitches .
Naseem is out of the tour I guess.Brace yourself for utter humiliation.
Shaheen
Naseem
Hasan Ali
These bowlers are absolute trash in Tests. We overhype Shaheen and Naseem too much based on T20s, but they’re absolute minnow level in the premier format.
Compare with Ind attack - Bumrah is a legend in Tests, absolutely dismantled Australia in Australia which even our legends like Wasim, Waqar and Akhtar couldn’t do.
We just don’t have the talent for Tests.
Naseem is out of the tour I guess.
Problem won't be Naseem and Shaheen, who at their best are good enough for Australian wickets. It's what comes after that . You need a good 3rd quick, a good spinner and preferably a good 5th bowling option as well to keep the pressure on.
PAK lack those and that's why they'll lose.
These are options not saying all of them should go . Their isn’t any other who can go AustraliaOn what basis will these bowlers be effective in Australia?
If Rauf and Hasnain play the fielders will be effective at getting the ball from the fence repeatedly.
The idea of sending Ihsanullah in to sacrifice his career for a meaningless cause doesn’t sound great either.
I don't know who should go but I know who shouldn't go, it is Haris Rauf. The guy is unfit and don't think he can bowl 15-16 overs a day. Also Australia love pace and he does not have any control. He will go over 5 runs an over similar to Varun Aaron for India in 2015 where he bowled quick and picked a few wickets but did not provide any control.
AbdullahThis series is going to be a bloodbath.
I can't see pak bowling out Australia in any of the test.
Expect someone like Smith or Khawaja to hit a triple century
I agree with your point about the all rounders to put up big scores on those types of pitches. But, why do you think Haris Rauf would find any success in Australia? The extra dimension he adds with pace is great, but I could see him being absolutely destroyed on those pitches because he is not going to be able to take full advantage of the bounce on offer with his height. Maybe if you use him strictly as an enforcer who comes in for 2-3 over spells to rough the batsmen up, but that still doesn’t answer the question of the other bowlers who will be able to get us to 20 wickets. Having an enforcer seems like a luxury and only useful if you have others who do the basics.Much of this thread seems to have been twisted by people failing to understand the difference between white and red ball cricket.
India won their last two series in Australia by the volume of runs that they scored. How else do you explain Shardul Thakur and Washington Sundar being victorious?
But that's OK. Pakistan hasn't taken to Australia a batting line up with so many competent batsmen (Babar, Rizwan, Abdullah Shafique, Saud Shakeel and Agha Salman) for at least 45 years. If the tail can be shortened with additional all-rounders, Pakistan should make scores of 350+ which make it hard to lose.
Bowling in Australia requires extreme height or pace. Batsmen are not going to attack Shaheen Shah Afridi or Haris Rauf with a slip cordon in place, and both really have to play. (If Naseem Shah was fit, Haris Rauf wouldn't be in the team).
The other bowlers are only there to strangle the scoring rate. Faheem has to bat at 8 and a part-time spinner has to bat at 7 - ideally Shadab Khan but Mubasir Khan would do. That leaves a place for a further quick bowler who can bat at Number 9.
The loss of Naseem Shah is a huge handicap. But at least Haris Rauf offers much more pace from a slightly greater height.
Mir is a decent bowler, was perhaps even a bit better a year or two ago. But I don't see anything that goes in his favor:I agree. He is slow and docile but picks up bags of wickets in FC so that is worth something. I don’t know who else to go for. Mo Abbas, who is even slower and shorter?
Haris Rauf is just 1 inch shorter than Jofra Archer. He's 1 inch shorter than Imran Khan, who had huge success in Australia.I agree with your point about the all rounders to put up big scores on those types of pitches. But, why do you think Haris Rauf would find any success in Australia? The extra dimension he adds with pace is great, but I could see him being absolutely destroyed on those pitches because he is not going to be able to take full advantage of the bounce on offer with his height. Maybe if you use him strictly as an enforcer who comes in for 2-3 over spells to rough the batsmen up, but that still doesn’t answer the question of the other bowlers who will be able to get us to 20 wickets. Having an enforcer seems like a luxury and only useful if you have others who do the basics.
Much of this thread seems to have been twisted by people failing to understand the difference between white and red ball cricket.
India won their last two series in Australia by the volume of runs that they scored. How else do you explain Shardul Thakur and Washington Sundar being victorious?
But that's OK. Pakistan hasn't taken to Australia a batting line up with so many competent batsmen (Babar, Rizwan, Abdullah Shafique, Saud Shakeel and Agha Salman) for at least 45 years. If the tail can be shortened with additional all-rounders, Pakistan should make scores of 350+ which make it hard to lose.
Bowling in Australia requires extreme height or pace. Batsmen are not going to attack Shaheen Shah Afridi or Haris Rauf with a slip cordon in place, and both really have to play. (If Naseem Shah was fit, Haris Rauf wouldn't be in the team).
The other bowlers are only there to strangle the scoring rate. Faheem has to bat at 8 and a part-time spinner has to bat at 7 - ideally Shadab Khan but Mubasir Khan would do. That leaves a place for a further quick bowler who can bat at Number 9.
The loss of Naseem Shah is a huge handicap. But at least Haris Rauf offers much more pace from a slightly greater height.
Haris Rauf, Really.Haris Rauf is just 1 inch shorter than Jofra Archer. He's 1 inch shorter than Imran Khan, who had huge success in Australia.
Batsmen can't attack him like they do in ODIs because they will get caught in the slips. Also, the ability to bowl 2 bouncers per over will discourage them from committing to the front foot.
Australia don't play Bazball. They always struggled with the extra pace of Wahab Riaz and Haris Rauf is much quicker than he was.
You need to practice and hone that skill over and over in first class cricket or do it for a couple of months in the nets.Just follow Bharat Arun off middle stump ruthless bowling plan with a stacked leg side field and you will be fine. Restrict the Australian scoring rate
How do you explain India winning at Gabba against an ATG Ozzie bowling attack, it wasnty the weight of first innings runs was it doc?Much of this thread seems to have been twisted by people failing to understand the difference between white and red ball cricket.
India won their last two series in Australia by the volume of runs that they scored. How else do you explain Shardul Thakur and Washington Sundar being victorious?
But that's OK. Pakistan hasn't taken to Australia a batting line up with so many competent batsmen (Babar, Rizwan, Abdullah Shafique, Saud Shakeel and Agha Salman) for at least 45 years. If the tail can be shortened with additional all-rounders, Pakistan should make scores of 350+ which make it hard to lose.
Bowling in Australia requires extreme height or pace. Batsmen are not going to attack Shaheen Shah Afridi or Haris Rauf with a slip cordon in place, and both really have to play. (If Naseem Shah was fit, Haris Rauf wouldn't be in the team).
The other bowlers are only there to strangle the scoring rate. Faheem has to bat at 8 and a part-time spinner has to bat at 7 - ideally Shadab Khan but Mubasir Khan would do. That leaves a place for a further quick bowler who can bat at Number 9.
The loss of Naseem Shah is a huge handicap. But at least Haris Rauf offers much more pace from a slightly greater height.
Two things. India plays more in Australia than Pakistan. I'd like to think even their A team makes tours. And they manage their players better than Pakistan.Some of our past and current players have pointed out that Pakistan always struggles in Australia due to the unfamiliar conditions. According to them, the grounds are composed of fine-grained sand or something similar, which makes fielding very challenging. This places significant stress on the knees and joints, causing fatigue more rapidly. I wonder how Indian players manage this, and is it just an excuse?
This is merely an excuse. By this logic, England and Australia would have never won Test series in Pakistan, as their players have zero experience playing in Pakistan. That's why I believe that our players lack professionalism.Two things. India plays more in Australia than Pakistan. I'd like to think even their A team makes tours. And they manage their players better than Pakistan.