What's new

Is the Indian team getting an unfair advantage in the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 by playing all its matches in Dubai?

There are two solutions to the problem -

1) Stop over broadcaster revenue and keep India out.
2) No more tournaments to be hosted in Pakistan.


If people are not happy with either solution, then just cry in the corner and accept life. :sree

Every little whining should have happened before. Not during the CT.
 
Usual idiotic posts bringing Pakistan into this.
Pakistan are out of this tournament, there are 6 other teams still fighting it out and this is disadvantageous to those teams.
PCB got played, intentionally to unintentionally, thechairman of the PCB, whilst trying to make it look like they got one over India, looks an absolute tool now.
 
There are two solutions to the problem -

1) Stop salivating over broadcaster revenue and keep India out.
2) No more tournaments to be hosted in Pakistan.

Or an even better solution....work hard and become a better cricket team than India so that you don't have to resort to such cheap excuses. How does that sound?
 
Or an even better solution....work hard and become a better cricket team than India so that you don't have to resort to such cheap excuses. How does that sound?
Personally I beleive there is a bigger issue. Like Test Championship final being in favor of SENA teams, this CT is heavily tilted in Bharat's favor.

We could be the best team in the world and deserving winners for any title, but it just feels hollow when we are the ones being treated royally even if it's not our fault. All boards have to figure out a working solution for this, this can't be repeated.
 
Don't try to change the subject. Red flag to answer a question with a biased question.

I'm just exposing the whole But but but we don't complain nonsense

You guys complained about wtc venues and the format itself. Before you guys threw a hissyfit in BGT as well.

Indians are the biggest cry baby nation on the planet. So is Pakistan but India is a bigger cry baby via population size, money and power abuse.

You guys don't have western calmness so please stop pretending to be them.

I can't think of any other major sport where one team receives so many blatant perks. Definitely an unfair advantage.

I think all of India's titles after 2011 WC should have asterisk marks (just like Bumrah's wickets). :inti
 
Personally I beleive there is a bigger issue. Like Test Championship final being in favor of SENA teams, this CT is heavily tilted in Bharat's favor.

We could be the best team in the world and deserving winners for any title, but it just feels hollow when we are the ones being treated royally even if it's not our fault. All boards have to figure out a working solution for this, this can't be repeated.
Look, India’s stance is very clear- we don’t let Pakistan profit off us nor remotely put our cricketers in any kind of danger. PCB could have told India to eff off, but they chose our money. Thats how the world works - the powerful get away with dictating terms, just like England & Australia did back in the days. The only solution is to become powerful enough to dictate terms like India did and nothing stops Pak or Bangladesh from doing that.
 
I can't think of any other major sport where one team receives so many blatant perks. Definitely an unfair advantage.

I think all of India's titles after 2011 WC should have asterisk marks (just like Bumrah's wickets). :inti
Nobody freaking cares about the asterisk marks, it’s the title that counts. Nobody brings up anymore England winning a WC on the basis of no. of boundaries or a ‘Hand of God’ kinda situation, what history books will show is that they won a WC. This is how it works.
 
If India had gone to Pakistan to play the champion trophy then they would have played all the matches at the Lahore .

:kp
Thats a bit of a different situation due to security and etc...however no security issues in UAE, India could have easily had matches in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Sharjah
 
Pakistan was the least travelling team in the 2023 World Cup group stage by a country mile and still ended up humiliating themselves.

In the 2024 T20 WC , India was made to play all their first round games on those pathetic New York surfaces while all other teams had already acclimatised to pitches in the Carribbean.. still not one of us complained and we went on to win the tournament undefeated.

Something to learn for the petulant crybabies who are always to quick to suck on the excuses lollypop instead of accepting they're garbage.
Despite the New York surface not being the best, India was the only team I believe to play there first 3 games in New York, so they got custom to the pitch and surface and that was an unfair advantage.

India should have had a game or 2 in Caribbean, during group stage but ICC and Broadcasters wanted to have India group stage games in US.
 
Despite the New York surface not being the best, India was the only team I believe to play there first 3 games in New York, so they got custom to the pitch and surface and that was an unfair advantage.

India should have had a game or 2 in Caribbean, during group stage but ICC and Broadcasters wanted to have India group stage games in US.

What? Did you even read what I wrote?

The important stages (super 8 + knockouts) of that tournament were played in West Indies but India had played all their group games in USA. Teams like Australia, England, NZ , Afg all played in WI and were acclimatised to those conditions by the time the super 8 stage started..

Where was all the moaning then ?
 
What? Did you even read what I wrote?

The important stages (super 8 + knockouts) of that tournament were played in West Indies but India had played all their group games in USA. Teams like Australia, England, NZ , Afg all played in WI and were acclimatised to those conditions by the time the super 8 stage started..

Where was all the moaning then ?
Why did India play all there matches in US than comes down to greed from ICC and Broadcasters, as per the knockout stages their was people moaning about it as well, but this is fault of ICC and Broadcasters, but India did get an advantage in there group stages matches as well, playing all 3 games in new york did give them an upper hand, for those matches.
 
Nobody freaking cares about the asterisk marks, it’s the title that counts. Nobody brings up anymore England winning a WC on the basis of no. of boundaries or a ‘Hand of God’ kinda situation, what history books will show is that they won a WC. This is how it works.

Are you seriously trying to explain the meaning of a title win to a Bangladeshi, whose team haven't even won an Asia cup? :ROFLMAO:
 
Why did India play all there matches in US than comes down to greed from ICC and Broadcasters, as per the knockout stages their was people moaning about it as well, but this is fault of ICC and Broadcasters, but India did get an advantage in there group stages matches as well, playing all 3 games in new york did give them an upper hand, for those matches.

You are making no sense at all. What advantage would India need against teams like Ireland and USA?

Money., greed or whatever the reason it maybe, it's a fact that India were disadvantaged in they T20 WC but still went on to win it undefeated. Heck even here in this tournament , had we lost in Dubai, no one would have batted an eye over this so called favour and advantage. Just that India won and are looking good to go the distance, people here are getting paranoid and salty.
 
You are making no sense at all. What advantage would India need against teams like Ireland and USA?

Money., greed or whatever the reason it maybe, it's a fact that India were disadvantaged in they T20 WC but still went on to win it undefeated. Heck even here in this tournament , had we lost in Dubai, no one would have batted an eye over this so called favour and advantage. Just that India won and are looking good to go the distance, people here are getting paranoid and salty.
Even if your playing a weak opponent, they still had an unfair advantage in the group stages, however staying on topic for the Champions trophy, the reality is, that India, if they go to the finals would have PLAYED all 5 matches at the same venue, so tell me how is that not an advantage for India.

India not wanting to go to Pakistan is one thing, But India is playing in UAE, they could have easily had matches spread in Abu Dhabi and Sharjah.
 
Even if your playing a weak opponent, they still had an unfair advantage in the group stages, however staying on topic for the Champions trophy, the reality is, that India, if they go to the finals would have PLAYED all 5 matches at the same venue, so tell me how is that not an advantage for India.

India not wanting to go to Pakistan is one thing, But India is playing in UAE, they could have easily had matches spread in Abu Dhabi and Sharjah.

Oh mere bhai...i request you to take a deep breath , read what you're writing and realise how dumb you sound right now.

How on earth did India had any advantage by playing in the USA when the business end of the tournament was about to be played entirely in the West Indies? "Unfair advantage" against Ireland and USA lmao...

And no..i never said India doesnt have an advantage in the champions trophy. I'm just stating the fact that there were multiple instances in the past where India clearly got the other end of the stuck (as I've explained in posts above) but noone here pointed that out of sheer bias.
 
Oh mere bhai...i request you to take a deep breath , read what you're writing and realise how dumb you sound right now.

How on earth did India had any advantage by playing in the USA when the business end of the tournament was about to be played entirely in the West Indies? "Unfair advantage" against Ireland and USA lmao...

And no..i never said India doesnt have an advantage in the champions trophy. I'm just stating the fact that there were multiple instances in the past where India clearly got the other end of the stuck (as I've explained in posts above) but noone here pointed that out of sheer bias.
tell me other instances where India got the other end of the stick, after 2011 world cup, it seems like all favors have been done for India.
 
NZ and SA played tri series before CT agianst Pakistan. Paksitan even had a dress rehersal vs NZ. Other teams didn't have that. Don't think anyone is crying over that. PCB and other boards agreed to it. End of story.
 
NZ and SA played tri series before CT agianst Pakistan. Paksitan even had a dress rehersal vs NZ. Other teams didn't have that. Don't think anyone is crying over that. PCB and other boards agreed to it. End of story.
You cant compare a tri-series, with an ICC event, PCB and ICC was going to agree with the hybrid model, which for me is not the biggest issue, but having all YOUR games in on stadium is clearly an advantage, when India could have easily played a game in Abu Dhabi and Sharjah. End of Story.
 
You cant compare a tri-series, with an ICC event, PCB and ICC was going to agree with the hybrid model, which for me is not the biggest issue, but having all YOUR games in on stadium is clearly an advantage, when India could have easily played a game in Abu Dhabi and Sharjah. End of Story.
Technically you can compare. Why would they waste money for hosting in different venues just for one team? It is financially a stupid decision. IT is a very short tournament as it is. One team can play a maximum of 5 matches. Minimum of 3 matches. THey played two matches on two different pitches. That is the least they can do. You can't go around "simulating" the "suffering" if you can call it equally for a stupid tournament like this.
 
Thats a bit of a different situation due to security and etc...however no security issues in UAE, India could have easily had matches in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Sharjah
Lol, to satisfy your imaginary conspiracy theories, Indian team should have been made to play at different venues in UAE.

You think it's as easy as you make it sound it is? Lol, easily!
 
Fact is, Dubai is the least as per our liking. Our prima donnas dread playing on such low and slow pitches. So poor they are on any pitch where there is a hint of turn.

If anything, Sharjah and Lahore would have suited us more.
 
Even if your playing a weak opponent, they still had an unfair advantage in the group stages, however staying on topic for the Champions trophy, the reality is, that India, if they go to the finals would have PLAYED all 5 matches at the same venue, so tell me how is that not an advantage for India.

India not wanting to go to Pakistan is one thing, But India is playing in UAE, they could have easily had matches spread in Abu Dhabi and Sharjah.

Agree.

Anyone with a functioning brain can see India always get unfair advantages/special perks.

During this CT:

- India have all games in Dubai. They don't have to move.
- Final group stage game is India's game so that they know what to do in case NRR is a factor.
- India have sufficient gaps between their games. So, they are rested well.
- Their semi-final and final venue is already fixed.

Do any other team receive these perks? I don't think so.

Cricket has become quite farcical. :inti
 
Agree.

Anyone with a functioning brain can see India always get unfair advantages/special perks.

During this CT:

- India have all games in Dubai. They don't have to move.
- Final group stage game is India's game so that they know what to do in case NRR is a factor.
- India have sufficient gaps between their games. So, they are rested well.
- Their semi-final and final venue is already fixed.

Do any other team receive these perks? I don't think so.

Cricket has become quite farcical. :inti
You are regurgitating the same stuff. Why don’t you respond to the fact that this is what PCB agreed to and infact claimed as negotiation victory? That they could have refused to bend over or arranged for multiple venues across UAE for India. India was happy to walk out of Champions Trophy, so why was PCB insistent on them playing?

Infact India should now add Bangladesh to this list after the hostility we see in that country. We should straight away refuse to play Bangla bros away or at home. We don’t gain anything by playing them. Let the 2 brothers from separate mothers play and make money off each other.
 
Much ado about nothing

In WC 2023, several teams like NZ, Pak had 2 matches each at 3 diff grounds (NZ had consec games at each ground) and others had 2 matches each at 2 grounds allowing them to sorta get accustomed.

Meanwhile India had 9 games at 9 different grounds. Why wasn't anyone talking about schedule advantages there?

These topics only become an issue in news when agenda driven journalists want to make them an issue.
 
If you look at carefully those who whined about it got eliminated already. They were eliminated not because India played on the same ground. They were eliminated because they suck.
Exactly, they all need to blame it on a villain to hide their own pathetic performance and that villain is conveniently India.

Though in the case of the whiny poms and the Bangla bros, I don’t get why are they even whining when they didn’t even reach the 2nd round to potentially face India in Dubai?
 
Exactly, they all need to blame it on a villain to hide their own pathetic performance and that villain is conveniently India.

Though in the case of the whiny poms and the Bangla bros, I don’t get why are they even whining when they didn’t even reach the 2nd round to potentially face India in Dubai?
England is traditionally known for whinging. Bangladesh fans have mastered the art of coping. Since the days they got the national status their loss is always due to somebody else or something else, not them. Imagine San Marino team fans (world's worst football country) mocking France for losing the final lol That is why I just ignore those trolls. Not worth our time.
 
Thats a bit of a different situation due to security and etc...however no security issues in UAE, India could have easily had matches in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Sharjah
It not BCCI responsibility/ Choice to fix the venue's but Host pakistan then ICC approved it.

Playing the match at the three vanues will cost too much for PCB and ICC.

Logistics issues are another reason .

:kp
 
Sorry I still prefer India playing these matches in Pakistan. Its not bilateral series anyhow. Just like how Pakistan plays ICC matches in India (with no other options), it is fine if India plays at least ICC matches in Pakistan (whenever scheduled). It is not about security anymore (as western countries are easily playing in Pakistan nowadays).

For national issues they can continue to stop playing bilaterals with each other (Pakistan isn't invited to India either). So let them play in ICC matches when situation demands, nothing wrong in that...
 
Good teams can win in any situation. Travel or not.

India would have been just as good (if not better) batting on some of these Pakistani wickets. Can't even imagine the damage Kohli would have done.

Pakistan having to travel to Dubai is unfortunate though. Not a nice sight to see and I'm sure any cricket fan would agree that's not how it should be for a host nation (same if it happens to India in 2026).
 
Good teams can win in any situation. Travel or not.

India would have been just as good (if not better) batting on some of these Pakistani wickets. Can't even imagine the damage Kohli would have done.

Pakistan having to travel to Dubai is unfortunate though. Not a nice sight to see and I'm sure any cricket fan would agree that's not how it should be for a host nation (same if it happens to India in 2026).
England had lost the back to Back match playing at the same venue ( Lahore)

So what is the excuse now ?

:kp
 
Good teams can win in any situation. Travel or not.

India would have been just as good (if not better) batting on some of these Pakistani wickets. Can't even imagine the damage Kohli would have done.

Pakistan having to travel to Dubai is unfortunate though. Not a nice sight to see and I'm sure any cricket fan would agree that's not how it should be for a host nation (same if it happens to India in 2026).
Agree
I felt, it is in bad light for India to not accept to travel to Pakistan when they have done the India tour during WC23

They could have asked for special protection if needed which I am sure PCB would have obliged.

Who will benefit from this nonsense?
Focus on these petty things will make us lose out on the bigger picture.
 
Pakistan having to travel to Dubai is unfortunate though. Not a nice sight to see and I'm sure any cricket fan would agree that's not how it should be for a host nation (same if it happens to India in 2026).
Despite being the bigger host (hosting far more no. of matches than other co hosts, BD & SL), India travelled to Dhaka to play its inaugural match there in CWC 2011.

So this is not something which is without precedent.
 
To be honest, the host should be (Pakistan+UAE) both wherein other teams also get to play some games in UAE,that would have made this tournament more exciting. Right now it seems really awkward when everyone else is travelling from Pakistan to UAE to play India and they play all their games in Pakistan. It feels like everyone is doing a favour towards India.
 
To be honest, the host should be (Pakistan+UAE) both wherein other teams also get to play some games in UAE,that would have made this tournament more exciting. Right now it seems really awkward when everyone else is travelling from Pakistan to UAE to play India and they play all their games in Pakistan. It feels like everyone is doing a favour towards India.
One Group's all matches should have been scheduled in UAE. 1 Semifinal + Final (if India qualifies) should have been scheduled there... But then a group match between India vs. Pakistan would be denied. (As there's less chance of Ind vs. Pak in knockouts these days, Pakistan aren't progressing from group stage). So it seems like there's still economic interest in India vs. Pakistan matches, but they are exhibiting artificial reluctance...

Probably they are intentionally avoiding bilaterals between these two countries, because at the moment it may look too one-sided and people may lose interest in this clash! (Even India were not this poor in 80s, 90s - they competed well against Pakistan then). So they are creating anticipation & hype in these ICC Matches and ensure that both are in the same group and play at least 1 match between them! This is kind of surprising and bizarre at the same time!
 
Whatever will be the result I'm always rooting for team india and doesn't depend on others team's to prove a point.

Can't wait for 20 Feb When we Will smashed Bangladesh then end the Pakistani fan's dream of winning the champion trophy on 23 Feb at the Dubai . Pakistan fan's will be like - ye tournaments to start hote hi end ho gya apna

:kp:qdkcheeky

How is your predictions are always so right?
 
How is your predictions are always so right?
His predictions are never right. He was dead wrong about BGT, dead wrong about NZ test series, Dead wrong about wc 2023.

Constantly spamming India will win, India will win every tournament and every match isn't a prediction lol.
 
@Devadwal did you see how Pakistanis are treating that journalist? I saw a video where one guy was in tears able to meet him. Never seen craze of a sports journalist like this 😂

We should have just let our team go there man. Imagine Kohli scoring a century in Lahore...people will go crazy. Imagine what attention superstar like Pandya will get. Imagine how much nihari Rohit could have feasted on.

Look, India beating Pakistan was given. But what better than beating them in their home and at the same time gaining adulation. Also, no one would have talked about this undue advantage etc.

We missed to witness all of that thanks to politics man.
 
Mitchell Johnson expressed his concerns in an article for local media in his home country:

"The 2025 Champions Trophy has generated quite a bit of discussion, particularly about India’s arrangement to play in Abu Dhabi [Dubai] not Pakistan which allows them to play on the same pitch for the entire tournament. Many respected voices have pointed out that this seems unfair to the other teams and it’s an argument that has legitimate weight despite the obvious security concerns India has about playing in Pakistan. This isn’t the first time the governing body has come under fire for how it handles matters related to India and it raises questions about the overall integrity of the tournament."

"This situation also brings up several questions regarding the tournament’s fairness, especially as the finals approach. If the finals end up in Dubai, teams will definitely need to be prepared to travel quickly and adjust to the local conditions, which can be a significant challenge."
 
Last edited:
Just try this…. Keep all matches of Pakistan team on dubai ground, let c how many they win?

India is getting advantage by playing all their matches on one ground, but why all this not started before commencement of CT? It’s started only after india won 2 back to back matches.

It’s all started by former English cricketers Artherton and vaghun. If they focused on English cricket team, then England wouldn’t lost yesterday to Afghanistan.
 
It not BCCI responsibility/ Choice to fix the venue's but Host pakistan then ICC approved it.

Playing the match at the three vanues will cost too much for PCB and ICC.

Logistics issues are another reason .

:kp
There playing in one country UAE, and the distances are not far either Dubai to Sharjah 1 hour and 15 minutes drive, and Dubai to Abu Dhabi is 1 hour and 30 minutes by drive, you guys are acting like each location is 5 hours away. Everyone knows ICC is basically BCCI. So hosting matches in other stadiums would cost too much for BCCI

(insert Ashok Dinda emoji here)
 
Agree.

Anyone with a functioning brain can see India always get unfair advantages/special perks.

During this CT:

- India have all games in Dubai. They don't have to move.
- Final group stage game is India's game so that they know what to do in case NRR is a factor.
- India have sufficient gaps between their games. So, they are rested well.
- Their semi-final and final venue is already fixed.

Do any other team receive these perks? I don't think so.

Cricket has become quite farcical. :inti
Exactly spot on mate.
 
Technically you can compare. Why would they waste money for hosting in different venues just for one team? It is financially a stupid decision. IT is a very short tournament as it is. One team can play a maximum of 5 matches. Minimum of 3 matches. THey played two matches on two different pitches. That is the least they can do. You can't go around "simulating" the "suffering" if you can call it equally for a stupid tournament like this.
You can compare, a tri- series is a tri-series and was used for practice purposes, ICC event is an ICC event, there is no comparison. Like you said its 5 game tournament, if one team can play all 5 matches in one venue, its an advantage. India could easily had 2 matches and dubai, 1 in sharjah, and have semi final in abu dhabi as an example, that way it would still make sense and be fair.
 
Lol, to satisfy your imaginary conspiracy theories, Indian team should have been made to play at different venues in UAE.

You think it's as easy as you make it sound it is? Lol, easily!
Yes it is easy the locations of the other stadiums are a little more 1 hour away, there not like 5 or 6 hours away. This could have been done very easily.
 
There playing in one country UAE, and the distances are not far either Dubai to Sharjah 1 hour and 15 minutes drive, and Dubai to Abu Dhabi is 1 hour and 30 minutes by drive, you guys are acting like each location is 5 hours away. Everyone knows ICC is basically BCCI. So hosting matches in other stadiums would cost too much for BCCI

(insert Ashok Dinda emoji here)
Lol traveling distance is not only include in logistics issue.

You can't host the champion trophy more than 3-4 venue due to champion trophy budget.

Adding two extra vanue is not possible because broadcasters have to set-up full crew team's in every grounds .

Kabhi to logical bat kiya karo .

:kp
 
Lol traveling distance is not only includein logistics issue.

You can't host the champion trophy more than 3-4 venue due to champion trophy budget.

Adding two extra vanue is not possible because broadcasters have to set-up full crew team's in every grounds .

Kabhi to logical bat kiya karo .

:kp
You can easily have matches in 2 locations if not 3, but lets say okay 3 venues, is too much for this rich and all powerful broadcasters, India could have easily had matches in 2 locations (dubai and abu dhabi) there would be no issues there for crew to set up if they just have to go to another location 1 or 2.

You need to stop seeing the world from and Indian lens, and stop hiding behind the K.P Emoji

(Insert Ashok Dinda Emoji Here)
 
You can easily have matches in 2 locations if not 3, but lets say okay 3 venues, is too much for this rich and all powerful broadcasters, India could have easily had matches in 2 locations (dubai and abu dhabi) there would be no issues there for crew to set up if they just have to go to another location 1 or 2.

You need to stop seeing the world from and Indian lens, and stop hiding behind the K.P Emoji

(Insert Ashok Dinda Emoji Here)
Its PCB responsibility to choose the venue so ask the question to PCB not ICC or BCCI

Champion trophy Total budget is 70mn USD so they can choose 10 venue or 3 or 4.

ICC will not provide any other money .

You can't arranged a wedding in birthday party money but Pakistan fans logic are hilarious.

:kp
 
You can compare, a tri- series is a tri-series and was used for practice purposes, ICC event is an ICC event, there is no comparison. Like you said its 5 game tournament, if one team can play all 5 matches in one venue, its an advantage. India could easily had 2 matches and dubai, 1 in sharjah, and have semi final in abu dhabi as an example, that way it would still make sense and be fair.
What do you achieve by just changing the venue? Tell me? Anyway it is only for one team. As it is logistics are tricky with 2 host countries. Why would you want to shift around venues just for one country? Unless you think UAE is also a host nation and they deserve equal amount of profit your suggestion makes no sense. UAE is not a host nation. They don't have to make arrangements in 3 different places just for one team. Besides this decision was finalized by Naqvi. It is too ignorant of all these experts talking about it when the agreement was reached upon long back. Even the scheudle was drawn in December, 2024. It says Dubai. Dubai has just 2 cricket stadiums. Only one is international. If you really want to scream foul, scream at PCB. WHy did they agree and you guys celebrated that agreement was a blow to BCCI?


As reported by ESPNcricinfo on Sunday, the decision to host India's matches at the eight-team Champions Trophy away from Pakistan, the official host country, and in the UAE was finalised after Mohsin Naqvi, the PCB chairman, met with Sheikh Nahyan Al Mubarak in Pakistan. Sheikh Nahyan is a senior UAE minister and also the head of the Emirates Cricket Board.
 
What do you achieve by just changing the venue? Tell me? Anyway it is only for one team. As it is logistics are tricky with 2 host countries. Why would you want to shift around venues just for one country? Unless you think UAE is also a host nation and they deserve equal amount of profit your suggestion makes no sense. UAE is not a host nation. They don't have to make arrangements in 3 different places just for one team. Besides this decision was finalized by Naqvi. It is too ignorant of all these experts talking about it when the agreement was reached upon long back. Even the scheudle was drawn in December, 2024. It says Dubai. Dubai has just 2 cricket stadiums. Only one is international. If you really want to scream foul, scream at PCB. WHy did they agree and you guys celebrated that agreement was a blow to BCCI?


As reported by ESPNcricinfo on Sunday, the decision to host India's matches at the eight-team Champions Trophy away from Pakistan, the official host country, and in the UAE was finalised after Mohsin Naqvi, the PCB chairman, met with Sheikh Nahyan Al Mubarak in Pakistan. Sheikh Nahyan is a senior UAE minister and also the head of the Emirates Cricket Board.
He will not understand because he don't want to understand simple things

:kp
 
Exactly, they all need to blame it on a villain to hide their own pathetic performance and that villain is conveniently India.

It has nothing to do with my country's pathetic performance. I don't watch cricket for BD alone. Even if BD don't play cricket, I would probably still watch cricket because I love this sport and I used to play cricket at club level myself.

You see, unlike Indians, we Bangladeshis are mature enough to handle constructive criticism. We don't jump around like 🐒 when someone constructively criticizes our country.

Do not think all nationalities think/behave like you Indians. We are not immature blind nationalists.

:inti
 
"The 2025 Champions Trophy has generated quite a bit of discussion, particularly about India’s arrangement to play in Abu Dhabi [Dubai] not Pakistan which allows them to play on the same pitch for the entire tournament. Many respected voices have pointed out that this seems unfair to the other teams and it’s an argument that has legitimate weight despite the obvious security concerns India has about playing in Pakistan. This isn’t the first time the governing body has come under fire for how it handles matters related to India and it raises questions about the overall integrity of the tournament."

"This situation also brings up several questions regarding the tournament’s fairness, especially as the finals approach. If the finals end up in Dubai, teams will definitely need to be prepared to travel quickly and adjust to the local conditions, which can be a significant challenge."

Australians have started their mind games.

What was CA doing when the decision was being taken? What was ECB doing?

Was Australia complaining when India had to play their group matches in 3 cities in US and then come to WI for the Knockouts?

It was all good when India was helping in raking in the dollars.

But its enjoyable to hear these guys whining.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol, to satisfy your imaginary conspiracy theories, Indian team should have been made to play at different venues in UAE.

You think it's as easy as you make it sound it is? Lol, easily!

It is not a conspiracy that ICC is now BCCICC.

The perks that Indian cricket team enjoy are very blatant. We are not blind. :inti
 
It has nothing to do with my country's pathetic performance. I don't watch cricket for BD alone. Even if BD don't play cricket, I would probably still watch cricket because I love this sport and I used to play cricket at club level myself.

You see, unlike Indians, we Bangladeshis are mature enough to handle constructive criticism. We don't jump around like 🐒 when someone constructively criticizes our country.

Do not think all nationalities think/behave like you Indians. We are not immature blind nationalists.

:inti
There is nothing constructive about your criticism, we all know your bias and agenda. And atleast we are proud of our own country and cricketers, not simping about others.
 
It is not a conspiracy that ICC is now BCCICC.

The perks that Indian cricket team enjoy are very blatant. We are not blind. :inti
Then why bother following this blatantly compromised game? Must have something better to do in life, no?
 
Also, I know even if these games were held across multiple locations and India were still winning these games, sooks would have found something else to sook about

This is nothing new. This has never ended, it never will.
 
Same Ground , Same Hotel , Same dressing Room , Massive Advantage of playing in same condition compared to other team's but England still lost :nasser :kp
NZ adapts to different situations, conditions better than others. Teams that can't do that don't win but whine. Remember what they did in 2019 world cup. In the 2019 wc match against India they deliberately reduced side boundary to 59 meter in a do or die game to deal with kuldeep. England, Bangladesh are big time whiners. Australia uses this to play mind games.
 
NZ adapts to different situations, conditions better than others. Teams that can't do that don't win but whine. Remember what they did in 2019 world cup. In the 2019 wc match against India they deliberately reduced side boundary to 59 meter in a do or die game to deal with kuldeep. England, Bangladesh are big time whiners. Australia uses this to play mind games.
Whatever Bangladesh says or does doesn't matter.
 
Whatever Bangladesh says or does doesn't matter.
No cricket board has issue with this arrangement. That is what counts. Fans crying foul is irrelevant here. But these former cricketers who are crying foul should do little research before crying.
 
It is not a conspiracy that ICC is now BCCICC.

The perks that Indian cricket team enjoy are very blatant. We are not blind. :inti
Now? This has been the case for close to a couple decades.

The blame squarely lies with the ICC. They are the ones to blame for the current situation.
 
Indian posters basically want others to bootlick India 24/7. Any form of constructive criticism is generally met with hostile responses. They don't have the maturity to process a constructive criticism. :inti

All of their achievements after 2013 should have asterisk marks. :inti
 
Indian posters basically want others to bootlick India 24/7. Any form of constructive criticism is generally met with hostile responses. They don't have the maturity to process a constructive criticism. :inti

All of their achievements after 2013 should have asterisk marks. :inti
Oh yeah, you are the epitome of unbiased behaviour and constructive criticism.

Indian participation was conditional, known way before the start of the tournament.

Now since teams are loosing, looking to cry wolf
 
Don't try to change the subject. Red flag to answer a question with a biased question.

I'm just exposing the whole But but but we don't complain nonsense

You guys complained about wtc venues and the format itself. Before you guys threw a hissyfit in BGT as well.

Indians are the biggest cry baby nation on the planet. So is Pakistan but India is a bigger cry baby via population size, money and power abuse.

You guys don't have western calmness so please stop pretending to be them.
Sure, whatavoutism is childish.

But instead of owning the weakness and fixing it, England always blames others.

India is not the biggest cry baby, if anything, it is one of the better nations in the World.

Coming back to cricket, sure India has certain advantage, the advantage however is incidental.

And in WC 23, India moved the most, so , think of it as a karmic payback.

All this hue and cry over nothing really.
 
@Devadwal did you see how Pakistanis are treating that journalist? I saw a video where one guy was in tears able to meet him. Never seen craze of a sports journalist like this 😂

We should have just let our team go there man. Imagine Kohli scoring a century in Lahore...people will go crazy. Imagine what attention superstar like Pandya will get. Imagine how much nihari Rohit could have feasted on.

Look, India beating Pakistan was given. But what better than beating them in their home and at the same time gaining adulation. Also, no one would have talked about this undue advantage etc.

We missed to witness all of that thanks to politics man.

Just watched this man .what is this ? Crazy

Even pakistan authority provided him security as i have seem some security personal in This videos

@Hitman @jnaveen1980 @Vikram1989 @JaDed @Nikhil_cric @Bhaijaan @cricketjoshila

:kp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Indian posters basically want others to bootlick India 24/7. Any form of constructive criticism is generally met with hostile responses. They don't have the maturity to process a constructive criticism. :inti

All of their achievements after 2013 should have asterisk marks. :inti
And atleast we have achievement to put an asterisk on.

Not unlike few boring teams who are always able to pull the entire tournament down with their lackluster performance.
 
Normal fans: Yes. It is an unfair advantage. We acknowledge and condemn.

Indian fans: $#%#%#@@@@!!!! How dare you call it unfair? $#%#%#@@@@!!!!

:inti
 
Normal fans: Yes. It is an unfair advantage. We acknowledge and condemn.

Indian fans: $#%#%#@@@@!!!! How dare you call it unfair? $#%#%#@@@@!!!!

:inti


Oh no, a generalized post putting all Indian fans in a single category

Oh no.... How will we ever live....
Please stop it, your propaganda.

Or already try to hide it 😜
 
Back
Top