What's new

Ishan Kishan - Indian batter

Rohit Sharma taught Ishan Kishan how to play fearless cricket

NEW DELHI: Ishan Kishan was just five when his father, Pranav Kumar Pandey, introduced him to coach Uttam Mazumdar at the Moin-ul haq stadium in Patna.
Mazumdar, just like he used to do with other students, asked Ishan to go to the nets and face a couple of deliveries. Watching a young Ishan batting with confidence, coach Mazumdar decided to take him under his wing.
Now, after almost sixteen years, Mazumdar was heard cheering "come on Ishan" while sitting in front of his television set at his residence, watching his student playing for the country and smashing the England
bowling attack with ease.
The 22-year-old Ishan made his debut in the second T20I against England on Tuesday in Ahmedabad and smashed 56 runs off 32 balls, an innings which was studded with 5 fours and 4 gigantic sixes.
With this he also became just the second Indian batsman, after Ajinkya Rahane, to score a fifty on T20I debut. His tally of four sixes in fact is the highest for an Indian batsman on debut on a T20 International. He also walked away with the Man of the Match award.

"It's been a long journey. It's sixteen years of hard work put in by Ishan and me. He has struggled a lot and put in a lot of hard work to reach this level. It was a proud moment for me to see him debut for India and play a match-winning knock. I was in front of the television set and watching him bat. I was in tears when he dedicated that knock to my father who passed away recently.
I am going through a tough time, but his words made my day. He played an unbelievable knock," Mazumdar told Timesofindia.com.
"He was five when he came to the Moin-ul-Haq stadium with his father. I took him to the nets and bowled a couple of deliveries to him. I realised he was talented and agreed to coach him. I told his father - 'this guy is a prodigy' and that he will go a long way," he said.

VIRAT BROKE THE DEBUT NEWS TO ISHAN
Ishan was handed his debut cap by India captain Virat Kohli. Apart from Ishan, Mumbai batsman and Ishan's Mumbai Indians' teammate Suryakumar Yadav also made his debut, but he didn't get a chance to bat.
Ishan was emotional and called his childhood coach and expressed his emotions and excitement.
"Ishan called me ahead of the match and said Virat bhai came and said you are making your debut today. He said 'sir, I am so happy'. He was very emotional at that moment. After handing the debut cap, Virat asked him to address the team. I wanted to keep him grounded. I just said, everyone makes a debut but there are very few who make their debuts unforgettable," Mazumdar further told TimesofIndia.com

I told him to stay calm and be composed and relaxed. I told him - 'you have faced world-class bowlers in the IPL and you have smashed them all over the park So go with the same mindset and intent"smashed them all over the park. So, go with the same mindset and intent.

Ishan was adjudged 'Man of the Match' for his valiant half-century. The Jharkhand batsman dedicated his maiden MoM award to his childhood coach's father, who passed away recently. "My coach's dad passed away a few days back and this innings was for him," Ishan had said during the post-match presentation.
"I was waiting for his call. He called me at 1 am. He was really happy. The first thing he said was - 'Sir, I did it'. It was a huge tribute to my father. He was very close to my father.
"Ishan always loved my father. My father always blessed him. In 2019, Ishan came to my place after a domestic match and sat with my father. My father predicted that Ishan will play for India in 2021. And his words came true. That was a huge blessing," Mazumdar said.

A DEBUT TO REMEMBER
When Ishan was batting on 42, he smashed England spinner Adil Rashid for back-to-back sixes to bring up his half-century.
After completing his half century though, Ishan forgot to raise his bat and acknowledge the crowd. It was Kohli, who was batting with him at that time, who told him to raise his bat.
Narrating the incident, coach Mazumdar said: "I asked about this over the phone. Ishan said 'Sir I forgot to raise my bat after the half-century'. We were both laughing. He said 'Virat bhaiya told me 'bat to dikha' (show your bat)'. Then he raised his bat and greeted the crowd."He also told me that when he reached 48 with a six, Virat said 'Ishan, sambhaal ke' (be careful, Ishan). He said 'haan bhaiya' (yes, brother) and showed a thumbs up to him. Off the very next ball, he again smashed a sixer to reach his half-century. Virat went up to Ishan and laughed while patting him on his head."

ROHIT SHARMA'S ROLE IN ISHAN'S PROGRESS
Ishan plays under Rohit Sharma's captaincy in the Mumbai Indians team in the Indian Premier League. Ishan also opened the batting alongside Rohit during the last edition of the IPL.
In 14 matches Ishant played for Mumbai Indians last season, he scored 516 runs at an average of 57.33, including four half centuries. He also narrowly missed out on a century when he was dismissed for 99 during a match against Royal Challengers Bangalore.
"Ishan has got a lot of confidence from Rohit. He has played a lot of cricket under Rohit's captaincy. Ishan has learned the art of playing fearlessly from Rohit. Rohit is his mentor and captain at Mumbai Indians. In the last IPL, Rohit gave him the opportunity to open the innings in the UAE. Rohit asked him to open alongside him. Rohit taught Ishan how to play fearless cricket. Ishan is fortunate to have a captain like Rohit," Ishan's childhood coach Mazumdar further told TimesofIndia.com.

THE UNDER-19 DAYS AND THE COMPETITION
Ishan was the captain of the Indian team in the 2016 Under-19 World Cup. He led a team that had the likes of Rishabh Pant, Washington Sundar, and Khaleel Ahmed - all players who made their India debuts before him.
On being asked about the competition between the players who played together in the past, Ishan's coach Mazumdar said: "They are good friends. They all respect each other. They have played cricket at the junior level together. The best part is that Ishan has spent more time in the domestic circuit in comparison with others. So he can handle pressure more than anyone else. It's good competition. It is healthy because they are all talented cricketers. The more the competition, the more Ishan will
mature. He shouldn't lose his focus. That's all."
"Cementing a place in the Indian team is very tough and challenging. I have asked him to take it one step at a time. He is very young and has a long way to go. There is a lot of competition within the team, so he needs to proceed slowly and perform consistently," he said.

"The best part is that Ishan, Washington, and Rishabh were all groomed under Rahul Dravid sir. He has polished these cricketers and the results are in front of us. All three are doing really well," Mazumdar signed off.


https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/england-in-india/rohit-sharma-taught-ishan-kishan-how-to-play-fearless-cricket-coach-uttam-mazumdar/articleshow/81528415.cms
 
Last edited:
I hope he continues like this. We've needed a good no 3 (without Kohli) for some time now.
 
Virat bhai said ‘be prepared, you’re selected as an opener in India T20 World Cup team': MI batter Ishan Kishan

Ishan Kishan is arguably one of the most attacking batsmen going around in Indian cricket and perhaps that is reason why India captain Virat Kohli is thinking of him as an opener in the T20 World Cup.

Mumbai Indians may have failed to qualify for the IPL 2021 playoffs but there is still a lot of excitement around MI players primarily because six of their squad-members are part of India's 15-man squad for the T20 World Cup beginning on October 17, two days after the IPL final. One of them is Ishan Kishan. The others - Rohit Sharma, Suryakumar Yadav, Hardik Pandya, Jasprit Bumrah and Rahul Chahar - too are vital parts of the set-up but there is a different curiosity around Ishan Kishan.

The left-hander is arguably one of the most attacking batsmen going around in Indian cricket and perhaps that is reason why India captain Virat Kohli is thinking of him as an opener in the T20 World Cup.

Kishan, who slammed a 16-ball fifty in MI's last league match against SRH in Abu Dhabi on Friday, and finished with 84 off 32 balls, revealed that Kohli had told him to be prepared to open the batting for India in the upcoming ICC event.

"I would love to open and that's what Virat bhai said - 'you are selected as an opener, you just have to be prepared for that.' In the bigger stage, you need to be prepared for every situation I feel," Ishan Kishan told host broadcaster Star Sports after the game against SunRisers Hyderabad.

The Indian side has two designated openers in Rohit Sharma, KL Rahul with Kohli himself being the third option - the captain has been opening regularly for RCB in this IPL.

But Kishan, who was going through a rough patch while batting in the middle order in the UAE leg of IPL 2021, immediately struck form, hitting back-to-back swashbuckling fifties after being promoted as an opener.

"I would love to open and that's what Virat bhai said - 'you are selected as an opener, you just have to be prepared for that.' In the bigger stage, you need to be prepared for every situation I feel," Ishan Kishan told host broadcaster Star Sports after the game against SunRisers Hyderabad.

It has been made keeping in mind future roadmap: Sourav Ganguly on Virat Kohlis decision to step down as T20 captain
'It has been made keeping in mind future roadmap': Sourav Ganguly on Virat Kohli's decision to step down as T20 captain

“A very good thing for me and for the team getting some runs, and getting into good touch before the World Cup. Was in a good state of mind, was very positive. We had to get somewhere around 250-260, it was the intent and positive intent,” Kishan said.

Mumbai won the match by 42 runs but it was not enough to take their NRR over Kolkata Knight Riders, who qualified as the fourth team after Delhi Capitals, Chennai Super Kings and Royal Challengers Bangalore for the playoffs.

"The one I smacked off Malik through the covers - that's the one (his favourite shot). In this tournament, you have to be prepared for every circumstances. It's important to be in the right mindset and you need to go with your best form," he said.

Kohli was seen having a long chat with Kishan last week, when the left-hander was dejected following a few low scores.

“I had a good chat with Virat bhai, Jasprit bhai also helped me. Even HP, KP were there to support me. Everyone supported me and they said it's a learning stage for you, make sure you learn from here and don't make the same mistakes in the upcoming world cup games. That was the part where I learned from them. I was just taking one point at a time,” he added.


Rohit Sharma also lavished praise on Ishan Kishan and said he batted the way Mumbai Indians wanted him to bat.

"But very happy with the win today; we gave everything, and I am sure it was entertaining for the fans too. [To the Mumbai fans] They have been the 12th man. They have always stood by us," said Rohit.

"Little disappointed we couldn't go through. Ishan Kishan is a very talented player, just the right position to bat is crucial. He just batted the way we want Ishan to," he signed off.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/virat-bhai-said-be-prepared-you-re-selected-as-an-opener-in-india-t20-world-cup-team-mi-batter-ishan-kishan-101633762861167.html
 
If Kishan can get us off to fliers, he'll be such an upgrade over Dhawan.
 
Amazing firepower at display from this guy vs England - India looking the part.
 
He's a bit of a cowlasher and not your archetypical classical Indian batsman, but the game has moved towards T20 cricket these days and the Indian team needs players like him in the shorter formats.
 
He is a bit like Afridi. On his day he can very destructive. He doesn't take singles after a 4 or 6. He will try go after another one which is an essential quality in T20.
 
We needed these kinda batsmen at the 2019 CWC.
Yeah, all we had were consolidators. Even 2 of these batsmen could have ensured the WC title for us.

That and then playing with clearly over the hill Dhoni, a greenhorn Pant and never was Karthik.

Who the hell plays 3 WKs in its XI in a WC SF?
 
Yeah, all we had were consolidators. Even 2 of these batsmen could have ensured the WC title for us.

That and then playing with clearly over the hill Dhoni, a greenhorn Pant and never was Karthik.

Who the hell plays 3 WKs in its XI in a WC SF?

Yeah. Pant should have been groomed from 2017 itself. Utter fiasco of a squad and we missed an extra fast bowlers well because we selected 3 spinners in england of all places
 
That and then playing with clearly over the hill Dhoni, a greenhorn Pant and never was Karthik.

Who the hell plays 3 WKs in its XI in a WC SF?

So you would be against playing Rahul, Pant and Kishan in the same XI in this tournament?
 
Rohit
Rahul
Kohli
Pant(wkt)
SKY/Kishan
Pandya
Jadeja
Shardul/ Bhuvi
R Chahar
Varun C
Bumrah
 
tbh all three are good to play.
and Rahul good enough to be a pure batsman
 
So you would be against playing Rahul, Pant and Kishan in the same XI in this tournament?
Problem with WC '19 squad was that these 3 are miles ahead of those 3, both individually as well as collectively. Also, don't think these 3 will play in same XI but you never know with Kohli.
 
Problem with WC '19 squad was that these 3 are miles ahead of those 3, both individually as well as collectively.

Regardless, it's pretty silly to suggest that you shouldn't field 3 wicketkeepers in the same XI. It's not like all 3 will be standing side-by-side behind the stumps wearing gloves. They were picked as 3 regular batsmen. Whether you think that they weren't the 3 best batsmen that could've been picked is another matter altogether. But "Who the hell plays 3 WKs in its XI in a WC SF?" is such an illogical argument.
 
Regardless, it's pretty silly to suggest that you shouldn't field 3 wicketkeepers in the same XI. It's not like all 3 will be standing side-by-side behind the stumps wearing gloves. They were picked as 3 regular batsmen. Whether you think that they weren't the 3 best batsmen that could've been picked is another matter altogether. But "Who the hell plays 3 WKs in its XI in a WC SF?" is such an illogical argument.
It isn't silly because this is something that has never been done before, no one plays 3 WKs in their XI, let alone in a WC SF. Have seen quite a few times when both Moin Khan and Rashid Lateef both played in the final XI for Pakistan but what we did that day was simply next level stuff!

Besides, when you're playing 3 WKs in your XI, 2 non-WKs should've batting as their stronger suit which simply wasn't the case and hence it was totally illogical to play all 3 of them in the same XI. A specialist batsman, if picked, may have failed too but would've been a logical decision to make that day.

Illogical was playing 3 WKs in a WC SF played on a tough pitch to bat on, all 3 of whom were no good. On a pitch like that, we should've beefed up our batting especially when we had to face Kiwi bowling on a pitch that was as per their liking. Instead, we played 3 duds who happened to be WKs too which only made us laughing stock that day.

For you, maybe it was logical but for me that illogical decision probably cost us that WC as our batting lineup was simply pathetic for those conditions.
 
It isn't silly because this is something that has never been done before, no one plays 3 WKs in their XI, let alone in a WC SF. Have seen quite a few times when both Moin Khan and Rashid Lateef both played in the final XI for Pakistan but what we did that day was simply next level stuff!

You fail to explain what makes playing 3 wicketkeepers in your XI wrong. It's wrong because it hasn't been done before? Opening the bowling with a spinner in an ODI had never been done before until Martin Crowe did it with Dipak Patel in the 1992 World Cup. Having an opening batting pair who attacked the bowlers had never been done before until Jayasuriya and Kaluwitharana did it in 1996. Are they both wrong because it hasn't been done before?

There's nothing wrong with playing 3 wicketkeepers if two of them can field well enough and they aren't taking the place of an all-rounder.

A specialist batsman, if picked, may have failed too but would've been a logical decision to make that day.
As if a "specialist batsman" only has to worry about his batting and not his fielding.

Being a specialist batsman alone doesn't make one a great batsman. Being a wicketkeeper batsman doesn't make one an inferior batsman to a specialist batsman.

Illogical was playing 3 WKs in a WC SF played on a tough pitch to bat on, all 3 of whom were no good. On a pitch like that, we should've beefed up our batting especially when we had to face Kiwi bowling on a pitch that was as per their liking.
The only option in terms of a "specialist batsman" was Kedar Jadhav who was worse than all 3 wicketkeeper batsmen. So no, it wasn't illogical at all.

What makes your argument all the more weaker is that the highest scorers in that match for India were Pant, Pandya, Dhoni and Jadeja. Two wicketkeepers and two all-rounders, while the two "specialist batsmen" in Rohit and Kohli both flopped.

Instead, we played 3 duds who happened to be WKs too which only made us laughing stock that day.

Like you said, they only "happened to be WKs too". There were bigger duds sitting on the bench so playing them would've been a worse decision. We were going to be a laughing stock anyway and that has nothing to do with playing 3 WKs.
 
Let us get back to Ishan Kishan now. So should he be the one behind the stumps now?
 
Last edited:
On a good batting wicket suited for 170+ scores, Ishan Kishan should be in the team.

But on a relatively slower wicket like in Sharjah, we are better off not playing him as he can become a liability.
 
Regardless, it's pretty silly to suggest that you shouldn't field 3 wicketkeepers in the same XI. It's not like all 3 will be standing side-by-side behind the stumps wearing gloves. They were picked as 3 regular batsmen. Whether you think that they weren't the 3 best batsmen that could've been picked is another matter altogether. But "Who the hell plays 3 WKs in its XI in a WC SF?" is such an illogical argument.

I would rather play a specialist or an all rounder instead of Pant/Kishan. It is pretty clear you do not put much effort into strategies and planning. Pant's strike rate is around 123 but has experience of 32 matches whereas Kishan's strike rate is 145 something after 3 matches so team management should decide between these two because playing them both is useless. You will understand this once the tournament starts. :inti
 
You fail to explain what makes playing 3 wicketkeepers in your XI wrong. It's wrong because it hasn't been done before? Opening the bowling with a spinner in an ODI had never been done before until Martin Crowe did it with Dipak Patel in the 1992 World Cup. Having an opening batting pair who attacked the bowlers had never been done before until Jayasuriya and Kaluwitharana did it in 1996. Are they both wrong because it hasn't been done before?

There's nothing wrong with playing 3 wicketkeepers if two of them can field well enough and they aren't taking the place of an all-rounder.


As if a "specialist batsman" only has to worry about his batting and not his fielding.

Being a specialist batsman alone doesn't make one a great batsman. Being a wicketkeeper batsman doesn't make one an inferior batsman to a specialist batsman.


The only option in terms of a "specialist batsman" was Kedar Jadhav who was worse than all 3 wicketkeeper batsmen. So no, it wasn't illogical at all.

What makes your argument all the more weaker is that the highest scorers in that match for India were Pant, Pandya, Dhoni and Jadeja. Two wicketkeepers and two all-rounders, while the two "specialist batsmen" in Rohit and Kohli both flopped.



Like you said, they only "happened to be WKs too". There were bigger duds sitting on the bench so playing them would've been a worse decision. We were going to be a laughing stock anyway and that has nothing to do with playing 3 WKs.
All I want to say is that just because Kohli & Rohit failed that day (all the more reason for us to have beefed up our batting for that day as that was a challenging pitch to bat), doesn't make the selection of the likes of Pant, Dhoni & Karthik any good. Ok, I get it that Dhoni couldn't have been dropped for obvious reasons.

As for Jadhav, even though he himself is average, he was anyday a better bat than Karthik. As for Pant, well he hadn't done anything of note in LoIs till that day.

Also, it was totally Kohli's fault to have picked up just 1 reserve bat (and that too Jadhav) for a WC which was being played in England. When the eventual champs England were overflowing with batting talent right till no.9, all we had were Kohli, Dhawan, and Rohit in our XI. You can't win a WC on the basis of just 3 batsmen.
 
All I want to say is that just because Kohli & Rohit failed that day (all the more reason for us to have beefed up our batting for that day as that was a challenging pitch to bat), doesn't make the selection of the likes of Pant, Dhoni & Karthik any good.

And just because they happen to be 3 wicketkeepers, doesn't mean choosing 3 wicketkeepers in the XI is wrong. All 3 were almost certainly not chosen in the XI because of their wicketkeeping, rather because of their batting. Like I said, you can say that they weren't the best batsmen either, but that's another matter altogether.

As for Jadhav, even though he himself is average, he was anyday a better bat than Karthik.
Arguable. I'm sure there are plenty of people who would've chosen Karthik over Jadhav. Jadhav doesn't have the power for a No. 6 batsman. He was miscast right from the start. Karthik probably got in the squad based on his Nidahas Trophy exploits and showed that he was a clutch player. Jadhav usually stayed hidden with a lot of quiet unbeaten innings but didn't often play that game-changing innings even when he had the chance.

When the eventual champs England were overflowing with batting talent right till no.9, all we had were Kohli, Dhawan, and Rohit in our XI.
That has to do with which players were backed all the way through to the World Cup. Yes, it was a mess. But if we're talking about the selection on the day of the World Cup semi-final, there was nothing wrong with it. It was a good XI based on the squad that was available to them.

You can't win a WC on the basis of just 3 batsmen.
This has been an issue since 2013. It's nothing new. We haven't developed a strong, stable middle order since Yuvraj, Dhoni, Raina.
 
There is something about him. I think he will go places, just needs to be backed and given a set role to play.
 
Three keepers again in another knockout.

Changing batting positions and same result.

Not too hard to figure out what is wrong!
 
Very average so far in the WC. So much for IPL preparing these new cricketers for the big stage. On the other hand, average cricketers such as Daryl Mitchell from NZ have looked a million dollars. Looks like another IPL and bilateral bully.
 
LPYiPKa.png
 
Lowest Strike Rate in a T20I Series for India :-


83.8: Murali Vijay in WT20 2010
85.5: Ishan Kishan in WI series 2022*
96.6: MS Dhoni in WT20 2009
98.0: Yuvraj Singh in WT20 2014
 
Brilliant innings by Kishan - 89 (56) in 1st T20I against Sri Lanka
 
This guy is the worst person to be in India’s dressing room.

I watched his debut and it was the most stunning debut I've seen for long as I can remember.

But am curious, what did he do.

I don't follow IPL, so no idea. I've seen an unwittingly funny video where he's wearing sunglasses in the MI dressing room and then notices Sachin is sitting there and embarrassedly pulls them off saying, 'Hello sir'. Pollard's reaction is :)))
 
On flat wickets where ball is coming well on bat, he is an out and out match winner.

On slow or two paced wickets, he has struggled. Still a WIP for extended formats but can be fine in the Tamasha cricket where the maximum quota is 120 balls.
 
I watched his debut and it was the most stunning debut I've seen for long as I can remember.

But am curious, what did he do.

I don't follow IPL, so no idea. I've seen an unwittingly funny video where he's wearing sunglasses in the MI dressing room and then notices Sachin is sitting there and embarrassedly pulls them off saying, 'Hello sir'. Pollard's reaction is :)))

The Mumbai Indians documentary on netflix gives a highlight of two idiots one the Ambani son and second Ishan ridiculous his attitude is and I remember posting his attitude after a car accident as well.
 
If Kishan continues to play like this in T20s, then I really don't see the need to play Pant in this format. :inti
 
On flat wickets where ball is coming well on bat, he is an out and out match winner.

On slow or two paced wickets, he has struggled. Still a WIP for extended formats but can be fine in the Tamasha cricket where the maximum quota is 120 balls.

Having said that, he is comfortably levels inferior as a batsman to Rishabh Pant who is operating at different levels and barely plays against oppositions like Windies or Sri Lanka which is why he shouldn't be analysed based on stats but purely on impact vs big dogs.
 
He is a rubbish bowlers bully. I dont rate any runs scored agianst this Srilankan side. He was struggling against military medium of Sheldon Cottrell who was getting little bit of a swing. Imagine what will happen when he faces Starcs, Rabadas and Shaheens of the world. I have always maintained Ishan Kishan is not an international standard batsman.
 
If Kishan continues to play like this in T20s, then I really don't see the need to play Pant in this format. :inti

Bro dont take it otherwise but you change your stance everyday like a Chameleon.

Just 5 days ago, you were mocking Ishan Kishan for his poor technique & IPL price. Today you want him to replace Pant in national side.

Stick to one stance man if you want to be taken seriously :))

PP.jpg
 
If Kishan continues to play like this in T20s, then I really don't see the need to play Pant in this format. :inti

I agree. Pant needs to be preserved for Tests and ODIs.

Pakistan also needs to consider the workload of M Rizwan and give him a break from ODIs may be? M Haris can be slotted in.
 
Bro dont take it otherwise but you change your stance everyday like a Chameleon.

Just 5 days ago, you were mocking Ishan Kishan for his poor technique & IPL price. Today you want him to replace Pant in national side.

Stick to one stance man if you want to be taken seriously :))

View attachment 115039

LMAO read the posts above and tell me where did I mock him? You are ignoring many posts here where I said that I would prefer Kishan over Pant in T20 format. Informing the other user about Kishan's IPL price is not mocking him or changing any stance. You should make up your mind because you look too desperate these days to prove me wrong. May be it has something to do with you changing your stance regarding Pandya, Pant and Rahul in last couple of months? :91: :inti
 
Having said that, he is comfortably levels inferior as a batsman to Rishabh Pant who is operating at different levels and barely plays against oppositions like Windies or Sri Lanka which is why he shouldn't be analysed based on stats but purely on impact vs big dogs.

What impact has Pant made in 43 T20 matches so far? What is Pant's level in T20s? :inti
 
Another pedestrian innings (8 off 20) from the overhyped prima donna.

And to think, he is the most expensive buy in this year's IPL. No wonder MI are still winless even after playing half their quota of games.
 
Hope he doesn't get into our national team. We already have too many passengers in our LoI teams.
 
This hack has too many technical deficiencies.
He hasn't been good in international cricket and he is definitely not an international standard batsman.
 
Another hack who got hyped only due to similarities with Pant. He is a poor man's Rishabh Pant. The quality he showed in U-19 matches way back is irrelevant now because international cricket and IPL has much higher benchmark than U-19.
 
Another hack who got hyped only due to similarities with Pant. He is a poor man's Rishabh Pant. The quality he showed in U-19 matches way back is irrelevant now because international cricket and IPL has much higher benchmark than U-19.

Exactly my thoughts. He should be nowhere near National team. I'd rather have DK as 2nd keeper for the Wt20 rather than this hack.
 
Left-handed batter Ishan Kishan was picked up by Mumbai Indians in the IPL mega auction for a whopping Rs 15.25 crore and the franchise was expecting him to be at his best and help the Rohit Sharma-led side get off to good starts.

However, after scoring 81 in the first game this season, Kishan has failed to get going and he is currently going through a slump in form. In eight matches so far, he has managed 199 runs with an average of 28.43.

After Mumbai Indians' eighth straight loss this season, head coach Mahela Jayawardene said that Kishan has indeed struggled in the last few games and his performance is not what the team are "looking from him up at the top".

"Obviously on the field you have seen that he struggled a bit in the last four games after having a good start in the first few. I have not had a conversation with him yet after this game to figure out what went through his mind on how we wanted to approach it. We have given him freedom to play his natural game which he probably has not executed well in the last few games," said Jayawardene during a virtual post-match press conference.

"We have had conversations with him, even today when Rohit was batting well, he struggled. That is a conversation I have to have with him after this game. But, yeah, definitely not what we are looking from him up at the top," he added.

In the match against Lucknow Super Giants, Kishan scored 8 runs off 20 balls and was not able to get going. He failed to rotate the strike and eventually was dismissed by Ravi Bishnoi in the eighth over of the innings.

Lucknow Super Giants defeated Mumbai Indians by 36 runs on Sunday to move to the fourth spot in the IPL points table.

Batting first, LSG posted 168/6 in 20 overs owing to skipper KL Rahul's unbeaten knock of 103 runs. With this innings, Rahul became the first player to score three 100s against one particular opponent in all T20 cricket.

Krunal Pandya then returned with three wickets as LSG restricted Mumbai to 132/8, registering a win by 36 runs.

NDTV
 
From whatever little I have seen of Ishan, he looked like a dynamite T20 opener. He is clearly going through a rough patch plus has some technical issues. I expect him to come back stronger assuming he works hard and has all his mind and heart into it.

We obviously dont know what is going on in a player’s personal life which massively impacts on field performance.
 
India’s talent and depth is incredible. Their reserve players are playing the type of knocks our first choice players cannot dream of.
 
He played very well but he was helped with the fact that opposition had two left arm spinners which allowed him to accelerate faster after struggling initially.

Pant and Samson are ahead in my opinion for keeper as well as batsman race.
 
He played very well but he was helped with the fact that opposition had two left arm spinners which allowed him to accelerate faster after struggling initially.

Pant and Samson are ahead in my opinion for keeper as well as batsman race.

Pant > Ishan > Samson in terms of ability. ButI like the intent that Ishan brings and I think they dropped him a little too early from T20 squad.
 
When I said bring him in the team I was told he is not good enough lol
 
Ishan Kishan scores the quickest double century from 126 balls against Bangladesh. Well played young man!
 
India’s talent and depth is incredible. Their reserve players are playing the type of knocks our first choice players cannot dream of.

If he was Pakistani, he would be immortalized after an innings like this & play forever. In India, there is no guarantee that he will play the next game.

As I said two days back, India should open with him & Pant in LOIs. It will be game over for other sides.
 
He was the captain of under 19 Indian WC team so how is he an IPL product? :inti

Ofcourse one would play U19 and junior cricket. Where you think IPL pick local young players from? But his game has improved significantly since playing for Mumbai Indians. So in a way we can call him an IPL product.
 
By that logic, even Rishabh Pant was in that same U19 WC team. Why do you keep connecting his name to IPL? :inti
Where did I connect his name to IPL when I myself have said that even Pant is not an IPL product multiple times lol? I am against the overhyping by his fans and how they support him blindly after poor performances. :inti
 
Ofcourse one would play U19 and junior cricket. Where you think IPL pick local young players from? But his game has improved significantly since playing for Mumbai Indians. So in a way we can call him an IPL product.
No he is not an IPL product. IPL product is someone who is not known to anyone and franchises or teams scout for that talent. I knew about Kishan, Pant, Umran. Bumrah is an IPL product. :inti
 
Where did I connect his name to IPL when I myself have said that even Pant is not an IPL product multiple times lol? I am against the overhyping by his fans and how they support him blindly after poor performances. :inti

Personally not a superfan of Pant but maybe if you stopped overly criticising him every single time he doesn't perform you wouldn't hear about him so often on here. :inti
 
Ishan Kishan Breaks Chris Gayle's World Record Of Fastest Double Hundred In ODIs

Ishan Kishan, the diminutive opening batter, slammed a belligerent double hundred during India's third ODI against Bangladesh at Chattogram. Kishan, who was drafted in for the last match of the series after captain Rohit Sharma got injured, threw caution to the wind as he slammed 23 boundaries and 9 sixes to reach the 200-run mark in just 126 deliveries. He had completed his century in just 85 balls.

Kishan broke the world record held earlier by West Indies great Chris Gayle, of slamming the fastest double hundred in 50-over cricket. Gayle had taken 138 deliveries to score his double hundred against Zimbabwe in the 2015 ICC World Cup. Kishan bettered the record by a massive 12 deliveries and also became the youngest cricketer to breach the 200-run mark in ODIs.

He has now become the fourth Indian after Sachin Tendulkar, Virender Sehwag and Rohit Sharma to slam a double century in ODIs. Rohit has three scores of 200-plus to his name. Ishan has become the 7th batter in the history of ODIs to score 200 runs in an innings.

The others apart from the Indians are New Zealand's Martin Guptill, West Indies' Chris Gayle and Pakistan's Fakhar Zaman.

Kishan eventually got out for 210 runs, having slammed 24 boundaries and 10 sixes in his innings.

NDTV
 
Records that Ishan was involved in today's match:

126 - Balls Kishan needed for his double-century, the fastest in ODI cricket. The previous fastest in men's ODIs was 138 balls by Chris Gayle, against Zimbabwe in 2015 World Cup, while the quickest double in all ODIs [across men and women] was Amelia Kerr's 134 ball effort against Ireland in 2018.

0 - Players to convert their first ODI century into a double century before Kishan. The previous highest score for the first century was 194* by Charles Coventry, against Bangladesh in 2009 in Bulawayo.

24y 145d - Kishan's age on Saturday, making him the youngest player to score a double-hundred in men's ODIs. The previous youngest was Rohit Sharma, who was 26 years and 186 days old at the time of his first double in 2013 against Australia.

1 - Kishan is now the first batter to score a double-century in ODI cricket against Bangladesh. The previous highest score against Bangladesh was the unbeaten 194 by Coventry.

0 - Number of individual ODI scores in Bangladesh higher than Kishan's 210. The previous highest score on Bangladesh soil was by Shane Watson, who scored an unbeaten 185 in 2011 in Dhaka.

34.6 - Team overs when Kishan reached 200 in Chattogram, the earliest point any batter has completed the landmark in ODIs. The previous earliest was in 43.3 overs by Virender Sehwag when he scored 219 against West Indies in 2011.

156 - Runs scored by Kishan in boundaries during his 210-run knock. Only two batters have scored more in boundaries in an ODI innings - 186 by Rohit against Sri Lanka in 2014 and 162 by Martin Guptill against West Indies in 2015.

103 - Balls Kishan needed to reach the 150-run mark - the fastest individual 150 by an Indian in men's ODIs. Sehwag held the record for bringing up his 150 in 112 balls against West Indies in 2011.

290 - Partnership runs for the second wicket between Kishan and Kohli, the highest for any wicket in ODIs against Bangladesh. The previous best was the unbeaten 282-run opening stand between Hashim Amla and Quinton de Kock in 2017.
 
Back
Top