blackanhyellow
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2012
- Runs
- 4,718
That's because India did not occupy East Pakistan. However, Pakistan occupied Kashmir and never allowed a plebisite. India did help EP at that time because it was a geographical nightmare for both countries and India didn't have the ability to feed tons of refugees from EP. Don't see any refugees from Kashmir going to Pak for assistance. EP movement was nationwide. Kashmir struggle is limited to a few districts.
You listed issues like refugees, so only if there are refugees do non state actors become freedom fighters instead of terrorists?
Kashmiri calls for Azadi are widespread throughout kashmir. The majority want independence. The people of the valley are in the majority, and an overwhelming majority of those people want independence.
You can not claim moral high ground claiming to liberate bangladeshis with funding, arming, training separatists, then claim Pakistan is supporting terrorists if it supports Kashmiri separatists.
Either both is wrong, or both is right.