- Joined
- Apr 13, 2025
- Runs
- 4,294
Travis Head smashes a 69-ball 100 in Perth, the fastest 4th innings century in Test history! I don't think so there is comparison between the two
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A hundred in 69 balls???!!!Travis Head smashes a 69-ball 100 in Perth, the fastest 4th innings century in Test history! I don't think so there is comparison between the two
who is the Travis Head in Pakistan?@Kianig89 @gazza619 @Caved12 @Raja Ishtiaq @BouncerGuy
How is this innings by Head acceptable? What is the ICC doing to ensure there is a fair balance between bat and ball??
Such innings are destroying interest in an already dying game! Soon, bowlers will be replaced with bowling machines! The human element of the art of bowling will be replaced by AI!
We must save this beautiful sport! I hope the ICC makes a statement and awards Rizwan’s 60 off 90 chasing 210 against Sri Lanka as the performance of the month!
Sharjeel head and Asif Maxwellwho is the Travis Head in Pakistan?
Sahibzada Farhan inshAllahwho is the Travis Head in Pakistan?
Are you suggesting Farhan should open in test matches?Sahibzada Farhan inshAllah
Does that even matter?who is the Travis Head in Pakistan?
See. Jeeb main char anay nahin hain aur chala mehal kharidne.Does that even matter?
We know Rizwan is the Gilchrist in Pakistan!!
Exactly!!!See. Jeeb main char anay nahin hain aur chala mehal kharidne.
Be clear!The biggest match winner/ game changer of this decade.
The game doesn’t needs more of him to make it dull and boring.Be clear!
We are talking about Rizwan,
Travis head is bringing the game into disrepute
You are wrongThe game doesn’t needs more of him to make it dull and boring.
You are right now.You are wrong
Rizwan is the game! He is the epitome of what cricket shouldn’t be.
Please stop twisting my words!You are right now.
It makes a difference. Ask opposition captain now, he is still in wow of what just happened in Perth today.Please stop twisting my words!
Tell me, what difference is there in chasing 210 in 28 overs and 46 overs?
How does it make any difference if you score 60 off 90, or 100 off 69 as long as you get the job done?
So??It makes a difference. Ask opposition captain now, he is still in wow of what just happened in Perth today.
Why can’t you make the effort I am making to defend Rizwan? I need my comrades!What an emotional eye watering discussion
I cant even remember i ever had a discussion on Babar v Khawaja with you. Who are you?@gazza619
Let me get this right, not only do you think the career of Babar Azam > Usman Khawaja, you also think Rizwan > Travis Head?
Are you actually okay?
Its worth tryingAre you suggesting Farhan should open in test matches?
You do remember because everyone was reminding you of you were still seeing the stars after my knockout blows.I cant even remember i ever had a discussion on Babar v Khawaja with you. Who are you?
Let me discuss issues with adults on this forum. Talk to someone your age like Ryan Ryan.
Cant do worse then the stylish Abdullah ShafiqueIts worth trying
Whats the point of a screenshot of a discussion between me and a random doctor?
Whats the point of a screenshot of a discussion between me and a random doctor?
If Babar is not a great player then who is a great player in the current Pakistan batting pool?To highlight that your cricketing sense is a joke and your lack of courage when challenged to produce evidence and arguments to back up your claims.
Firstly, in what world is Babar a great player? If you're promoting him and doing this as voluntary work. My advice is for you to go get a life.
Secondly, if you truly believe Babar is a great player, have the cojones to respond and tell us what makes him a great player. You also ran away when you challenged me to prove Khawaja > Babar. I produced my arguments and then you came up with "I'll respond back tomorrow" and then ran off like you always do.
If Babar is not a great player then who is a great player in the current Pakistan batting pool?
Why are you restricting the discussion to test cricket to suit your agenda?The last great player for Pakistan was Younis Khan.
Why this Sri Lanka never gets replaced by Australia, England or India or WC Finals or WTC Finals in the above statement? Ever wondered?So??
Sri Lanka have not been able to pick themselves up either after that innings by Rizwan in the 3rd ODI!
Is that Rizwan’s problem?Why this Sri Lanka never gets replaced by Australia, England or India or WC Finals or WTC Finals in the above statement? Ever wondered?
Why are you restricting the discussion to test cricket to suit your agenda?
YK was a below average white ball player.
What makes YK a great player? What metrics did you use?You asked "who is a great player in the current Pakistan batting pool?"
In response, I said Pakistan's last great batsmen was Younis because in the current side there are no great players.

What makes YK a great player? What metrics did you use?
Dont follow foot steps of the Ranas of this forum. You are claiming YK to be a great player. I am asking why.This is a baffling question, even by your standards.
Let's get this straight, you think Babar is a great player but you have doubts about YK's credentials as a great player?
You must have a very low threshold for greatness, if Babar meets your criteria.
Why are you attacking me? I’ve been following your footsteps throughout this thread!Dont follow foot steps of the Ranas of this forum. You are claiming YK to be a great player. I am asking why.
If you are struggling to back it up then stop arguing with adults.
Dont follow foot steps of the Ranas of this forum. You are claiming YK to be a great player. I am asking why.
If you are struggling to back it up then stop arguing with adults.
right, so YK had a good calibre. Is this the best you got?Back to Younis Khan, his calibre was very similar to Rahul Dravid, a universally acknowledged great. So asking someone to back up if Younis Khan was great would be absurd.
right, so YK had a good calibre. Is this the best you got?
When I mention "Ranas," please understand that I am not targeting you personally. Rather, "Rana" represents a particular mindset—one that tends to be timid, self-centered, and self-entitled, often ignoring the reality of the situation.Why are you attacking me? I’ve been following your footsteps throughout this thread!
Sorry I forgot you are using chatgpt. I appreciate it takes time to copy paste and add a few of your own words to make it sound real. I will wait for your golden words.Don't worry, I promise I will back it up. Don't sweat over that.
Why are you attacking me? I’ve been following your footsteps throughout this thread!
Hain? Ranas views are like Babar’s batting?timid
Sorry I forgot you are using chatgpt. I appreciate it takes time to copy paste and add a few of your own words to make it sound real. I will wait for your golden words.
Answer the question and don’t be a Rana. How is YK a great player?You can deflect as much as you like.
But I would rather have a debate with someone who's got a half decent understanding of cricket.
In your world, Babar is a great and Younis Khan isn't. So tell me why should anyone take you seriously?
Answer the question and don’t be a Rana. How is YK a great player?
This is not about YK vs Babar.What you meant to say was, don't be a bottle job like you.
You resorted to these tactics last time round when you asked me to prove Usman Khawaja > Babar. I obliged for the greater good of your cricketing education. After that, you vanished. So what's the point?
You ran away from me and you also ran away from @Dr_Bassim when pressed on your views.
I will ask you one last time. You can answer either one of the questions below and then I'll put my case forward for why YK is a great:
If you can't answer any of these questions, the question is why are you are unwilling to disclose it? Is it because you don't want to other posters to find out that you're an agenda driven poster?
- Is Babar > Younis Khan?
- Do you think Younis Khan is a great?
This is not about YK vs Babar.
I am asking you why is YK a great player.
This is a baffling question, even by your standards.
Let's get this straight, you think Babar is a great player but you have doubts about YK's credentials as a great player?
You must have a very low threshold for greatness, if Babar meets your criteria.
This is not about YK vs Babar.
I am asking you why is YK a great player.
How? You have any numbers to prove that?Younis Khan is unquestionably great since he has comfortably surpassed Babar's career
YK was a terrible ODI player. Are we revising history now?
If we are combining ODI and Test match performances then Babar is better
You rate Babar as a great player. By that measure, Younis Khan is unquestionably great since he has comfortably surpassed Babar's career,
Going by this logic Babar > Sunil Gavaskar, Rahul Dravid and Mahela Jaywardena![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The RizBar cult never fail to expose their awful reading of the game![]()
Younis has 9 ODI centuries, Babar has 20 and he has played over 100 games less![]()
![]()
This is not true. He wasn’t as good as he should have been but he was not a ‘terrible’ ODI player.YK was a terrible ODI player
Younis has 9 ODI centuries, Babar has 20 and he has played over 100 games less![]()
![]()
This is not true. He wasn’t as good as he should have been but he was not a ‘terrible’ ODI player.
YK more than held his own in a great middle order of YK, Inzi and Yousuf. That was one of the strongest ever 3-5 in Pakistan ODI history to play together in a side.
Once again focus on YK.Going by this logic Babar > Sunil Gavaskar, Rahul Dravid and Mahela Jaywardena![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The RizBar cult never fail to expose their awful reading of the game![]()
This is not true. He wasn’t as good as he should have been but he was not a ‘terrible’ ODI player.
YK more than held his own in a great middle order of YK, Inzi and Yousuf. That was one of the strongest ever 3-5 in Pakistan ODI history to play together in a side.
Once again you’re showing your shallow grasp of the game.
Have you ever considered why Inzamam’s ODI average and strike rate sit well below Babar’s? Even Misbah’s average was higher.
Back in the 2000s, ODI triangulars and bilaterals were contested by full-strength sides. Today, most teams field second or even third-string bowling attacks.
If Younis Khan had debuted two decades later, it’s hardly unreasonable to think he’d have piled up a similar number of hundreds to Babar, given the abundance of opportunities to cash in against weaker opposition.
So you admire YK the ODI player. Thanks for the laughsYK more than held his own in a great middle order of YK, Inzi and Yousuf.

.Once again you’re showing your shallow grasp of the game.
Have you ever considered why Inzamam’s ODI average and strike rate sit well below Babar’s? Even Misbah’s average was higher.
Back in the 2000s, ODI triangulars and bilaterals were contested by full-strength sides. Today, most teams field second or even third-string bowling attacks.
If Younis Khan had debuted two decades later, it’s hardly unreasonable to think he’d have piled up a similar number of hundreds to Babar, given the abundance of opportunities to cash in against weaker opposition.
So you admire YK the ODI player. Thanks for the laughs
![]()
Ok enough polution.To add to the above, average score in the 2000s was 250ish. That rose by 20% to 300+ beyond 2010.
So it’s misguided to compare their stats as though they were compiled under identical conditions
Are a you seriously trying to argue that YK wasn’t a great player?right, so YK had a good calibre. Is this the best you got?
*breaking away from characterSo you admire YK the ODI player. Thanks for the laughs
![]()
.
Yeah but Inzi didn't look absolutely clueless and won the most games for us in history. Younis looked absolutely lost out there
*im going to have to break character here for a bit
@topspin bro, you need not waste time with these covid/Misbah’s najaiz cricket fans when discussing the standards of cricket during the eras. Younis Khan in Test cricket has played some of the unreal innings that guys like Babar+Rizwan will never play even as a combined entity.
Some of his ODI innings were elite too. When he was on, the guy was an absolute delight to watch. I firmly believe he was on course to become Pakistan’s solid number 3 who set the pace and tempo of the innings around the 2007-8 time (maybe even before it). I remember back then I was in total awe of players like Ponting because they were setting the tempo for their side by bossing it at 3. Punter always batted at a strike rate close to a hundred. He never really celebrated a 50, it wasn’t job done for him. He had that attitude. I wanted a player like that for Pakistan and for brief moments I thought YK was easing into this role.
Pakistan have had too many years of turbulence, politics and infighting as soon as Inzimam stepped away and then you had a slow crawl in of players like Misbah, whilst a drama queen like Hafeez was getting louder and louder with his stuck up attitude! Shoaib Malik as usual doing his “cloak and dagger” politics whilst falling out with everyone. Yousuf continuously living in a delusion of royalty within his head and Shahid Afridi with his menopause tantrums that he would randomly throw here and there.
All of these chawwals (although good cricketers) were kept in line during the Inzimam+Woolmer era! They were all let loose like a bunch of wild, toxic pendus and it basically ruined what could have been a great era for Pakistan cricket because the players were still top quality as they had fine batsmen and top class fast bowlers.
YK the proper no.3 ODI batter was lost in this period.
Yeah I’m convinced you never saw Inzi or Younis play.Yeah but Inzi didn't look absolutely clueless and won the most games for us in history. Younis looked absolutely lost out there