What's new

National Assembly passes 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill in overnight session [Post Updated #155]

Do you support or oppose the proposed constitutional amendment bill in Pakistan?

  • Yes - The bill is necessary for judicial reforms and will strengthen the constitution

    Votes: 3 20.0%

  • No - The bill is an attack on the judiciary's independence and will undermine the constitution

    Votes: 12 80.0%
  • Total voters
    15
FearlessRoar said:

Bilawal affirms commitment to constitutional amendments ahead of Oct 25 deadline​


Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has reiterated his commitment to completing the constitutional amendments, stating that if they are finalised before October 25, the matter can be resolved peacefully.

In a session with reporters in Islamabad on Wednesday, Bilawal was asked about his stance on former prime minister Imran Khan's military trial. He replied, “We need to assess the evidence first; after all, we have the authority to grant a presidential pardon.” He maintained that the PPP stands against the death penalty.

When questioned about the proposed constitutional amendments and their deadline of October 25, he stated, “If the amendments are made before October 25, the matter can be settled peacefully. While they can be done later, it may lead to confrontational situations.”

He further asserted that the PPP would not abandon the matter concerning the constitutional court, vowing to see it through to completion. “We have already faced significant delays; our demands date back to 2006 and are part of our manifesto,” he added.

Bilawal also criticised the judiciary's timing regarding certain actions, questioning why the timing of the injunction on reserved seats was not being scrutinised. He pointed out that the judiciary's four-page clarification issued on September 14, the day of a parliamentary session, raised questions about the judicial timing.

He mentioned that the head of the constitutional court would serve a three-year term and expressed his opposition to the establishment of military courts, emphasising that the justification for the federal constitutional court lies in the Supreme Court's historical precedents.

On the Karachi unrest case, which has been ongoing since 2011, Bilawal noted that the judiciary had affected the local government system under the pretext of this case, questioning whether unrest existed only in Karachi, as Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan also face similar issues.

He further criticised the political manoeuvring regarding the selection of the next Army Chief, suggesting that events on May 9 were bordering on insurrection. He warned that if constitutional amendments are not enacted, the resulting situation might spiral beyond anyone's control, noting that the 18th Amendment had previously blocked the path to martial law.

tribune.com.pk

Bilawal affirms commitment to constitutional amendments ahead of Oct 25 deadline | The Express Tribune

PPP chairman asserts party will not abandon the constitutional court matter, vowing to see it through to completion
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
Click to expand...
In total the PPP has around 30 seats and the Nooras around 20 legit seats and even this is stretching it. But the genetics of these parties is autocracy and they are about to bulldoze through a constitutional amendment that have no support for. This is so that the retarded Establishment can stay for 5 years based the CJP getting a 3 year extension.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

'Hold off on amendments until SCO Summit ends', Fazl asks govt​


Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman called on the government to delay the proposed constitutional amendments until the conclusion of the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) conference.

During a press conference in the capital on Tuesday, the JUI-F leader also urged the opposition to suspend their protests to maintain political stability during the international event.

Fazlur Rehman, while addressing the media, emphasized the need for a more deliberative process regarding the constitutional amendments, pointing to the example of the 18th Amendment, which took nine months of discussions before all parties reached an agreement.

“The government informed me that these amendments are being rushed, but I question why there is such urgency to make constitutional changes under an emergency,” he stated. “If force is used to impose these amendments, we will stand firm in our opposition.”

He further highlighted that the government's authority in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan appears to be waning, suggesting that the current political and internal divisions should be transformed into a movement toward unity.

“The situation our country is facing requires careful attention. The government's writ has weakened in these provinces,” he said, calling for restraint and consensus-building.

The JUI-F chief also raised concerns over the halt in the registration of religious seminaries, accusing the government of spreading false propaganda. “If the government has demanded, then they should also listen to ours,” Fazlur Rehman insisted.

When asked about potential political manoeuvring, Maulana Fazlur Rehman dismissed any notion of disunity within his ranks, stating that no members of his party had defected.

He reiterated his stance against "match-fixing" and horse-trading in politics, affirming his commitment to his party’s discipline. He clarified that there is no agreement in place for a joint protest with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).

Mr Fazl also touched upon the ongoing violence in the Middle East, expressing grave concern over Israel's continued aggression against Palestinians. He condemned the silence of the Muslim Ummah on the matter, calling it "worrisome."

“Israel is engaging in state-sponsored terrorism, and the Muslim Ummah is watching in silence. This silence must be broken,” he stated, while accusing Israel of using Western and American weaponry to further its military goals.

Fazlur Rehman also noted that the conflict has expanded to Lebanon, where prominent Muslim leaders are being targeted.

He called on the Muslim world to unite and take a stand against what he termed as Israel's "brutality and bloodshed." “The Muslim Ummah has to put an end to this terror,” he asserted, urging for immediate action.

www.samaa.tv

'Hold off on amendments until SCO Summit ends', Fazl asks govt

Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Thursday called on the government to delay the proposed constitutional amendments until the conclusion of the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) conference.
www.samaa.tv www.samaa.tv
 

No deadline for constitutional amendments from PPP: Bilawal Bhutto Zardari​


Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari stated that there is no deadline for constitutional amendments from their side, although the government may face one.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, he stressed that the issue of a timeline for passing the proposed constitutional amendments is not a concern for the PPP. “However, the government may have a deadline,” he noted.

Bilawal highlighted that the government has the option to seek votes based on conscience, yet efforts for consensus are ongoing. “The PPP aims to work collaboratively with all political parties,” he said, expressing a desire to include various factions, including Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F), in the discussions.

Regarding the status of constitutional amendments, he mentioned that the JUI-F has not yet provided a draft for the proposed changes. “Once the draft arrives, we will review it and engage in dialogue with JUI-F to determine the way forward,” he stated.

The PPP chairman also commented on recent judicial developments, referencing an order that was issued on a holiday without the Chief Justice’s prior knowledge. He reaffirmed the PPP's commitment to judicial reforms and equal rights for provinces.

Bilawal indicated that there was initial agreement on constitutional courts and judicial reforms from Rehman of JUI-F. However, he noted that the government’s attempts to amend Articles 8 and 51 of the Constitution were met with resistance from both the PPP and JUI-F.

When asked about Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), he remarked that Imran Khan and his party were given multiple opportunities on various issues but exhibited a lack of seriousness.

“If Imran Khan had made political decisions since April 2022, he would have been the prime minister today,” he asserted, adding that Khan seems more interested in engaging with the establishment than with politicians. “I do not see a bright political future for Imran. We formed a committee for political consensus, but PTI boycotted it as well,” he concluded.

tribune.com.pk

No deadline for constitutional amendments from PPP: Bilawal Bhutto Zardari | The Express Tribune

PPP chairman says govt has the option to seek votes based on conscience, yet efforts for consensus are ongoing
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 
Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) President Nawaz Sharif and Pakistan Peoples Party Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari have held discussions during which the two leaders reached an agreement on constitutional amendments

Bilawal called on Nawaz Sharif at the Punjab House, where the former Prime Minister welcomed the PPP leader. The two leaders also exchanged views on the country's political situation.

The discussion primarily focused on judicial reforms and constitutional amendments.

They decided to present these amendments in Parliament following further consultation, with the timeline for this process to be determined in consultation with other political parties.

Maryam Aurangzeb, Rana Sanaullah, Pervez Rashid, Irfan Siddiqui, and Ahsan Iqbal attended of the meeting from the PML-N.

Meanwhile, the PPP delegation included Yousaf Raza Gillani, Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, Khursheed Shah, Murtaza Wahab, Murtaza Javed Abbasi, Naveed Qamar, and Palwasha Khan.

Nawaz Sharif is scheduled to attend a dinner in honour of a Saudi delegation later tonight.

What are the constitutional amendments about?

According to an earlier working paper for the 26th Constitutional Amendment, one of the key proposals includes the establishment of a parallel Federal Constitutional Court, alongside the Supreme Court.

The Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court will serve for three years, with retirement set at 68 years of age. Additionally, the amendment proposed that any member of parliament voting against party instructions will have their vote disregarded.

The proposal also suggested that the authority to appoint the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court be transferred to the Prime Minister, based on recommendations from an eight-member committee of the National Assembly.

One of the most notable amendments includes changes to Article 48 of the Constitution, which would prevent any court, tribunal, or authority from inquiring into advice sent by the Prime Minister or Cabinet to the President.

Meanwhile, an amendment to Article 63 would ensure that votes cast against party instructions will no longer be counted.

Another major proposal in the working paper involves changes to Article 78, which advocates for the creation of the Federal Constitutional Court.

Additionally, amendments to Article 175 suggest that judges of the High Courts and Sharia Courts will be appointed by a commission, with the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court heading this commission.

The commission will consist of the two senior-most judges of the Constitutional Court, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the two senior-most Supreme Court judges.

Further, the commission will include the Minister of Law, the Attorney General, a senior advocate, and two members each from the National Assembly and Senate.

For the appointment of judges to the Federal Constitutional Court, the commission will no longer involve Supreme Court judges, instead consisting of three additional judges from the Constitutional Court.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
Govt to move constitutional amendment in NA on Oct 18

The ruling coalition is likely to table the much-talked about constitutional amendment bill in the National Assembly on Oct 18.

According to sources, the government has barred its members of parliament (MPs) from going abroad till Oct 18 in the wake of 26th amendment.

The government has also directed the former MNAs who were earlier de-notified by the ECP, to reach Islamabad on Oct 17.

It is being speculated that the ECP may take back its earlier decision of de-notifying the MNAs before the NA session.

Earlier in the day, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) President Nawaz Sharif and Pakistan People's Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari had agreed on constitutional amendment during a meeting held in Islamabad.


Dunya News
 
Constitutional package still in limbo as consensus eludes parliamentary committee

The government’s much-touted constitutional amendment remains in limbo as consensus eluded the Friday meeting of the parliamentary committee set up to debate the package.

The much-talked-about Constitutional Package is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the top judge’s term.

Three separate drafts of the constitutional package are being prepared – one by the government, the second by the PPP, and the third by the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F).

The committee, led by PPP’s Khursheed Shah, has the representation of all parties, including the PTI. It was formed by the National Assembly speaker for reconciliation among lawmakers, particularly between the PTI and the government, after a raid by plainclothesmen to round up the PTI men from the Parliament House.

The parliamentary committee meeting took place today where major political parties, including the PML-N, PPP, PTI and JUI-F, discussed drafts for the constitutional package.

Talking to reporters after the meeting, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar said recommendations were presented to the committee but the members could not reach any agreement.

“The PTI asked for time to examine and they did not give their opinions today,” he said, adding that the JUI-F, which was expected to share its suggestions at today’s meeting, was asked to share its draft as well. He said the party might present its draft tomorrow.

“We will meet tomorrow at noon to take matters forward,” he added. Tarar said the suggestions from the government and the bar bodies were brought before the committee and it was decided to have another meeting on Saturday.

JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman said the government shared a draft for the first time, adding that the PPP and JUI-F will have talks with one another and make attempts to produce one draft, after which it will be shared for consultation with the PML-N and PTI to achieve consensus.

He said other political parties would be brought aboard as well.

PTI leaders Amir Dogar and Barrister Ali Gohar were also present at the meeting.

Gohar said that the PTI would give suggestions when a detailed draft was presented.

“We have not seen anything from the government,” he said.

Meanwhile, Dogar said that the government’s draft “has ambiguity” and it should present plans to the committee with clarity. He said further committee meetings would be held.

“The amendment requires more time,” he said, adding, “We will talk with party members and experts, and with Maulana Fazlur Rehman as we have an understanding.”

Earlier, the PPP and PML-N decided to postpone the much-touted constitutional amendment until after the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, and agreed to incorporate the suggestions put forth by Fazl as the ruling coalition woos his support to achieve a two-thirds majority in parliament.

Source: Dawn News
 

PPP proposes provincial constitutional courts in line with federal structure​


The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) has released a draft of constitutional amendments, proposing more than 20 changes, including the establishment of provincial constitutional courts in line with federal structures.

According to the draft received by Express News, the PPP has suggested amendments to Articles 175, 191, 189, 175B, 209A, and 210, with an additional amendment proposed for Article 175AA.

The draft states that a federal constitutional court should be established under the new constitutional amendments, with the Chief Justice serving a term of three years.

The PPP's proposal aims to mirror the federal model by recommending the creation of provincial constitutional courts as well.

Through Article 191AA, the PPP has introduced a provision for separate constitutional courts in each province, including the suggestion for a separate Chief Justice for the provincial constitutional court.

These courts are proposed to be established in provincial capitals, with judges appointed by an eleven-member committee.

The Chief Justice of the constitutional court would head the committee responsible for appointing judges to both federal and provincial constitutional courts.

The proposed amendments indicate that two members from the National Assembly and the Senate would be included in the judges' committee.

A three-member committee, led by the Chief Justice of the provincial constitutional court, would submit the names of judges to the constitutional committee. The draft also outlines a procedure for the removal of judges under Article 209.

Moreover, the proposed amendments state that a five-member commission, headed by the Chief Justice of the constitutional court, would have the authority to remove judges.

This commission would consist of the Chief Justice of the constitutional court, two senior judges, and two judges from the provincial constitutional court.

An constitutional commission would be established to oversee the appointment of judges, and a similar commission at the provincial level would manage judicial appointments in Pakistan.

tribune.com.pk

PPP proposes provincial constitutional courts in line with federal structure | The Express Tribune

These courts are proposed to be established in provincial capitals, with judges appointed by eleven-member committee
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 

Hafiz Naeem calls proposed amendment 'attack on constitution'​


Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) chief Hafiz Naeemur Rehman criticised the proposed constitutional amendment regarding the Supreme Court, labelling it an "attack on the constitution" and called on the opposition to fully reject it.

“Debating the amendment’s details is tantamount to strengthening the government. Any vote in favour will be seen as a tool of the establishment," he stated.

JI chief also called on the government to immediately terminate contracts with independent power producers (IPPs) linked to the military, bureaucracy, and the Sharif family.

He urged Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to announce public relief by reducing electricity bills from next month, citing potential savings of Rs411 billion if five IPP contracts are ended.

Speaking at a rally in Gujrat, Hafiz Naeem said, "The military and civilian bureaucracy should forgo their privileges, as the public can no longer bear the burden of the ruling class's extravagance."

He added that JI’s movement had brought the issue of IPP profiteering to light, which would otherwise have continued unchecked.

Source: The Express Tribune
 

Abbasi slams proposed constitutional amendments​


Senior politician Shahid Khaqan Abbasi has strongly opposed the proposed 26th Constitutional Amendment, stating that undermining the judiciary’s independence is not a solution to past mistakes.

In a statement on the prposed amendments, Abbasi, an Awam Pakistan Party leader, voiced concerns over the government's actions, questioning its mandate.

He warned that the proposed amendment would severely impact the judiciary's autonomy.

"The proposed law allowing the transfer of High Court judges will be used to put them under pressure," Abbasi said, further stating that this would weaken the protection of citizens' fundamental rights.

He also criticised the introduction of a Federal Constitutional Court, suggesting it would diminish the role of Supreme Court judges.

Abbasi also raised alarms over the potential expansion of military court trials, describging them as a direct assault on civil liberties.

"Destroying judicial independence is not a remedy for the bad decisions of the past," Abbasi concluded, firmly opposing any move that threatens the core values of the justice system.

He has previously called for Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa to retire after completing his tenure, amidst what he described as political instability and chaos in the country.

Furthermore, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) Chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on October 11 expressed conditional support for the government's proposed constitutional amendments, emphasising the need for consensus among political forces.

Following a Special Committee of Parliament meeting, Rehman said: “We are trying to remove the controversial contents from the draft.”

He added that the public had rejected the government’s initial draft.

The constitutional package aims to establish a federal constitutional court and set a three-year tenure for the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP).

The government initially attempted to present the amendments last month, but faced resistance from both allies and opposition members, prompting a consultation process.

Former PM Khaqan Abbasi criticizes proposed 26th constitutional amendment | The Express Tribune

He voices concerns over govt's actions questioning its mandate and proposed amendments impact on judiciary's autonomy
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 
Govt, opposition inch their way to a consensus

As the majority, except for the PTI, agreed to alter the procedures for superior judges’ appointment, the special parliamentary committee still failed to evolve a consensus on the constitutional package, with the JUI-F advocating a “constitutional bench” instead of a constitutional court proposed by the government.

The committee which has the representation of all parties, including the PTI, met for the second consecutive day on Saturday amid reports that the constitutional package would be tabled in parliament by Oct 25.

A day after the PPP made its draft proposals public, the JUI-F shared its draft of proposed amendments with the committee under the chairmanship of PPP leader Syed Khursheed Shah.

The committee will meet again on Monday (tomorrow) hoping to achieve the consensus, with the chair constituting a sub-committee to review the drafts submitted by both the government and the opposition parties.

The sub-committee will provide its recommendations to the parliamentary committee and includes Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, PTI leaders Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Barrister Ali Zafar; PPP’s Farooq H. Naek; and JUI-F leader Kamran Murtaza.

Amid hopes for a consensus, the parliamentary panel will meet again on Monday.

A participant of the meeting from the ruling coalition said homework will be completed in behind-the-scenes meetings. They added that “we may have a consensus document ready before Monday’s meeting, leaving the PTI aside”.

Talking to reporters after the meeting, PML-N senior leader Irfan Siddiqui claimed that the committee was close to reaching a consensus on constitutional amendments, with key political parties aligning on major points. He said that the primary goal of the special parliamentary committee was to reach a consensus on constitutional amendments.

He expressed optimism about the ongoing discussions with the JUI-F, noting recent meetings brought a positive outlook. He said that the government’s draft, with suggestions from the legal community and bar associations, has been finalised.

The Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) also submitted a separate draft focused on local government reforms, although it agrees with the broader constitutional amendments.

“The PTI is the only party that has not submitted anything in writing,” Senator Siddiqui said.

PPP-JUI consensus

According to JUI-F leader Kamran Murtaza, the only difference between the JUI-F and PPP drafts is that of the constitutional court. The JUI-F has proposed a constitutional bench instead of a constitutional court, he said. The JUI-F has no objection to the rest of the PPP’s draft, he added.

The JUI-F leader said the party was opposed to the constitutional court because it would be inappropriate to establish a separate court for only 200 cases.

PPP parliamentary leader in the Senate Senator Sherry Rehman said, “We are trying to bring the constitutional amendment with consensus.”

PPP leader Raja Pervez Ashraf echoed Mr Murtaza’s optimism, noting that JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman had suggested drafting a joint proposal with the PPP, which would be shared soon. “Things are moving in the right direction. Stay positive,” Mr Ashraf remarked, adding that the Oct 25 deadline was unrelated to the constitutional amendment discussions.

Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar emphasised the need for dialogue to reach a consensus on amendments. He said the constitutional amendment could be introduced after Oct 25, and even after two months. He said discussions were ongoing on four to five points in the committee.

Answering a question about the notification regarding the appointment of the new CJP, he said the deadline for this was Oct 24, adding that the notification of the new chief justice had always been issued a day or two before the appointment. The appointment notification of Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa was issued a little earlier in view of the arrival of the caretaker government, he pointed out.

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar confirmed that his party had not yet presented a draft. He said the party’s founding chairman was to be consulted before submitting proposals.

An informed source told Dawn that during the meeting of the special parliamentary committee, the PTI was requested to cancel or at least delay its plan for protest on Oct 15, but it flatly refused.

In response to the request, PTI leader Omar Ayub Khan said PTI activists were being harassed and raids were being carried out at their houses. “Staging a protest under these circumstances is our constitutional right,” Omar Ayub was quoted as saying. He claimed that it never happened in the past.

Senator Irfan Siddiqui debunking the claim recalled the day when he was picked up from his house during the PTI government.

‘Unfinished agenda’

Meanwhile, in a message on social media platform X, PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari shared the draft of the constitutional amendments proposed by the PPP and invited meaningful feedback from the public.

He said this proposal was to complete the unfinished judicial reforms agenda outlined in the Charter of Democracy. “We propose the creation of a Federal Constitutional Court, with equal representation of all federating units.”

Mr Bhutto-Zardari wrote, “We also propose ending the process of appointment of the judges, by the judges and for the judges. Instead, by merging the judicial and parliamentary committees we give an equal role to parliament, judiciary and legal fraternity.”

In a related development, the PPP and JUI-F discussed proposed constitutional amendments at Zardari House.

DAWN NEWS
 
Bilawal Zardari posted on his X handle:

Who was Justice Dorab Patel and why did he also want a federal constitutional court? His experience proved Pakistan needed it.

Justice Patel was former Chief Justice Of Sindh High Court. Justice of The Supreme Court of Pakistan. Co-founder of Human Rights Commission of Pakistan and amongst the founding members of Asian Human Rights commission.

Justice Patel was one of four honorable judges who acquitted Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and refused to be party to his judicial murder. He held that there wasn’t the evidence to convict Quaid-e-Awam and he did not consider approver as a reliable witness. Dorab Patel also said that the trial of Shaheed in the High Court in his absence was flawed. Something it took the Supreme Court of Pakistan 45 years to recognize.

Justice Patel refused to take Dictator Zia’s PCO oath in 1981 choosing instead to resign. Had he not he would have become the Chief Justice of Pakistan.

He proposed the idea of a constitutional court to his colleagues at HRCP Asma Jahangir & IA Rehman who agreed with him.

Our history is inconvenient for those who think Pakistani politics begins with the cricket World Cup and culminates in Imran/General Faiz Inqalab. Our commitment to our, constitutional evolution, manifesto and Charter of Democracy remains consistent despite the changing faces of Prime Ministers, Justices and Establishment.

We never legislate or amend the constitution at a whim like dictators and judges have so easily done. We work towards our goals for generations. It took us 30 years to restore what we could of 1973 constitution in the 18th amendment. It has taken us almost 2 decades to get to the point we can undo the damage done by 19th amendment and PCO CJP Chaudry’s judicialization of politics. 26th amendment is not rushed. It’s long over due.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1845429515067011390
 
FearlessRoar said:
Bilawal Zardari posted on his X handle:

Who was Justice Dorab Patel and why did he also want a federal constitutional court? His experience proved Pakistan needed it.

Justice Patel was former Chief Justice Of Sindh High Court. Justice of The Supreme Court of Pakistan. Co-founder of Human Rights Commission of Pakistan and amongst the founding members of Asian Human Rights commission.

Justice Patel was one of four honorable judges who acquitted Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and refused to be party to his judicial murder. He held that there wasn’t the evidence to convict Quaid-e-Awam and he did not consider approver as a reliable witness. Dorab Patel also said that the trial of Shaheed in the High Court in his absence was flawed. Something it took the Supreme Court of Pakistan 45 years to recognize.

Justice Patel refused to take Dictator Zia’s PCO oath in 1981 choosing instead to resign. Had he not he would have become the Chief Justice of Pakistan.

He proposed the idea of a constitutional court to his colleagues at HRCP Asma Jahangir & IA Rehman who agreed with him.

Our history is inconvenient for those who think Pakistani politics begins with the cricket World Cup and culminates in Imran/General Faiz Inqalab. Our commitment to our, constitutional evolution, manifesto and Charter of Democracy remains consistent despite the changing faces of Prime Ministers, Justices and Establishment.

We never legislate or amend the constitution at a whim like dictators and judges have so easily done. We work towards our goals for generations. It took us 30 years to restore what we could of 1973 constitution in the 18th amendment. It has taken us almost 2 decades to get to the point we can undo the damage done by 19th amendment and PCO CJP Chaudry’s judicialization of politics. 26th amendment is not rushed. It’s long over due.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1845429515067011390
Click to expand...
He is trying to hard to impress the establishment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
PPP opposes vote on constitutional amendments on Oct 18

The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) has opposed holding a vote on constitutional amendments on Oct 18.

According to PPP source, the party has suggested that the government should present the amendment either before or after Oct 18, as the PPP’s central leadership will be busy in the Hyderabad rally on that date, commemorating the Karsaz tragedy.

Sources indicate that the amendments could be presented in parliament n Oct 17. Previously, the PPP had opposed bringing the amendments on Oct 13, as the federal government intended to carry out the legislation on that Sunday.

The federal government had called its overseas and allied parliamentarians back before Oct 13 for this purpose.


 
Cricket Warrior said:
PPP opposes vote on constitutional amendments on Oct 18

The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) has opposed holding a vote on constitutional amendments on Oct 18.

According to PPP source, the party has suggested that the government should present the amendment either before or after Oct 18, as the PPP’s central leadership will be busy in the Hyderabad rally on that date, commemorating the Karsaz tragedy.

Sources indicate that the amendments could be presented in parliament n Oct 17. Previously, the PPP had opposed bringing the amendments on Oct 13, as the federal government intended to carry out the legislation on that Sunday.

The federal government had called its overseas and allied parliamentarians back before Oct 13 for this purpose.


Click to expand...
The PPP are a disgrace. For a short term gain they have destroyed the PK constitution. Off course they will vote for it and what's more the Generals have them by the short and curlies
 
As always Molana is playing on both sides of the pitch
====

The PPP and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman reached Lahore’s Jati Umra residence of the Sharif brothers on Wednesday to discuss the proposed 26th constitutional amendment

The much-talked-about Constitutional Package is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the top judge’s term.

Three separate drafts of the constitutional package were being prepared — one by the government, the second by the PPP, and the third by the JUI-F. A committee, led by PPP’s Khursheed Shah, has the representation of all parties, including the PTI. It was formed by the National Assembly speaker for reconciliation among lawmakers, particularly between the PTI and the government, after a raid by plainclothesmen to round up the PTI men from the Parliament House.

The PPP and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) reached an agreement a day ago on a shared draft. Although the key points of the constitutional package were not disclosed, Fazl had made it clear that he had rejected the previous draft and would not compromise on parliamentary supremacy or the essence of the Constitution.

Source: Dawn News
 
The Bald Eagle said:
As always Molana is playing on both sides of the pitch
====

The PPP and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman reached Lahore’s Jati Umra residence of the Sharif brothers on Wednesday to discuss the proposed 26th constitutional amendment

The much-talked-about Constitutional Package is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the top judge’s term.

Three separate drafts of the constitutional package were being prepared — one by the government, the second by the PPP, and the third by the JUI-F. A committee, led by PPP’s Khursheed Shah, has the representation of all parties, including the PTI. It was formed by the National Assembly speaker for reconciliation among lawmakers, particularly between the PTI and the government, after a raid by plainclothesmen to round up the PTI men from the Parliament House.

The PPP and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) reached an agreement a day ago on a shared draft. Although the key points of the constitutional package were not disclosed, Fazl had made it clear that he had rejected the previous draft and would not compromise on parliamentary supremacy or the essence of the Constitution.

Source: Dawn News
Click to expand...
The guy is as bent as they come. I hope he gets so many crore that his beer belly explodes.
 

PM Shehbaz meets President Zardari to discuss constitutional amendments​


Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has met with President Asif Ali Zardari at the President house to discuss proposed constitutional amendments and the prevailing political situation.

The meeting on Thursday comes as the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) step back from their earlier proposal to establish constitutional courts, Express News reported.

Moreover, during a special parliamentary committee meeting, chaired by Khursheed Shah, discussions were held on the 26th constitutional amendment draft.

According to sources, the governing coalition parties and Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) have agreed to drop the proposed 26th constitutional amendment, which called for the creation of constitutional courts.

Instead, they reached a consensus on forming a constitutional bench.

The special committee meeting concluded with the government and JUI-F deciding to consult the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on a joint draft. JUI-F leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman will share the finalised draft with PTI leadership, marking the nearing completion of the amendment process.

However, Information Advisor for Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Barrister Saif announced PTI will mount both legal and political resistance against the proposed constitutional amendment.

PTI lawmaker Barrister Saif labelled on Thursday that the current government is "illegitimate" and accused it of "attempting to secretly alter the constitution without public representation".

PTI's political committee has announced its decision to resist recent constitutional amendments and hold a nationwide protest this Friday, according to the Express-News.

The parliamentary committee will reconvene after Friday prayers to continue discussions on the draft.

Earlier today, Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan's (MQM-P) amendments to 26th constitutional draft have been discarded.

The proposed amendments related to local government powers and funds have also been removed from the draft.

The ruling parties, Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N) and Pakistan People's Party (PPP), succeeded in convincing MQM.

However, MQM's constitutional amendments will be considered in the next 27th constitutional amendment, with the party expressing agreement with the government's suggestions.

tribune.com.pk

PM Shehbaz meets President Zardari to discuss constitutional amendments | The Express Tribune

PML-N and PPP withdraw from the proposal for constitutional courts, agreeing on alternative reforms.
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 
Key points in constitutional amendments draft

The draft for a series of constitutional amendments prepared by the Federal Law Minister has emerged, aimed at revising several key clauses within Pakistan’s Constitution, ARY News reported on Thursday.

As per the details, the proposed draft addresses various aspects of governance, judicial appointments, and the powers of key officials.

One significant proposal includes amending Clause 4 of Article 48, which states that the advice given by the President, the Cabinet, and the Prime Minister of the country cannot be challenged in any forum.

Another major proposed change is to Article 63A, which pertains to voting procedures within political parties. The government’s amendment would allow the votes cast by lawmakers against the instructions of their party’s leader to be counted.

After such a vote, the party leader would retain the authority to take action against the dissenting members.

The government has also suggested amending Article 111, allowing provincial assembly discussions on legal matters to involve not just the Attorney General but also legal advisors, expanding their influence in legislative matters.

One of the more significant reforms concerns the appointment of judges, outlined in a proposed amendment to Article 175A.

The Judicial Commission would be tasked with reviewing the performance of High Court judges, and a new procedure for appointing Supreme Court judges is suggested.

The proposal includes forming a judges’ appointment committee composed of two government members – a senator and an MNA proposed by the PM – and two opposition members – nominated by the opposition leader – with additional parliamentary input.

Additionally, the 12-member parliamentary committee – comprised of eight members from National Assembly (NA) and four senator – would have the power to appoint the Chief Justice of Pakistan, selecting from among the three most senior judges.

These reforms also include the provision for in-camera meetings during the appointment of the Chief Justice.


ARY News
 
I believe the judges would oppose it anyway after 25 October if not for Pakistan then for their own sake.
 
JUI-F rejects govt constitutional amendment draft, warns against pressure tactics

Head of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F) Maulana Fazal ur Rehman has firmly rejected the government’s proposed constitutional amendment draft, claiming that undue pressure is being applied to his party’s members.

Talking to media along with PTI leadership, Fazal ur Rehman highlighted concerns that members of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and Balochistan National Party (BNP) are facing intimidation tactics.

JUI-F chief emphasized that if such coercive measures continue, his party may be compelled to halt dialogue with government. He asserted that constructive discussions would yield positive responses but warned that if the government adopts a bullying approach, they will reciprocate in kind.

Rehman emphasized that if such coercive measures continue, his party may be compelled to halt dialogue with the government. He asserted that constructive discussions would yield positive responses but warned that if the government adopts a bullying approach, they will reciprocate in kind.

Moreover, he revealed that his party members are being lured with substantial offers, indicating a concerning trend in political manoeuvring.

Source: Daily Ausaf
 
Diesel is complaining that his people are getting kidnapped and blackmailed. Where have you been old man? Why are you surprised.
 
Some govt guy was asked on why we don't know what's in the amendment, he said thr public doesn't know. This arrogance comes knowing that you have no public support and all you need is guns and the guys with guns.
 

Constitutional package 'unanimously approved' by parliamentary committee​


In a major development, the special parliamentary committee — comprising government and opposition members — on Friday "unanimously" approved the draft of 26th Constitutional Amendment.

The development comes after the special committee formed to debate the contentious judicial package met under the chairmanship of PPP lawmaker Syed Khursheed Shah on Friday.

Speaking to the reporters, Shah said the draft would be presented in the federal cabinet meeting for approval.

"The draft has been approved unanimously," he said adding that the committee has also agreed on allowing overseas Pakistanis to contest the elections.

www.thenews.com.pk

Special committee 'unanimously approves' judicial package

In a major development, the special parliamentary committee — comprising government and opposition members — on Friday unanimously approved the draft of 26th Constitutional...
www.thenews.com.pk www.thenews.com.pk
 

Final decision on constitutional amendments after Imran Khan’s directions: Gohar​


Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Barrister Gohar Ali Khan said on Friday that a consensus has been nearly reached with Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman regarding the 26th Constitutional Amendment, and a final announcement will be made after consultations with PTI founder Imran Khan.

Speaking to the media following a meeting with Maulana Fazlur Rehman in Islamabad, Barrister Gohar explained that PTI held a meeting with its allies, including the JUI-F chief, to discuss the constitutional amendments. He stated that there was a strong possibility of reaching an agreement during the previous talks, and Friday's meeting further solidified that understanding.

"We are still in talks. Once we finalise our position, we will seek Imran Khan’s instructions. Today, we will request a meeting with him, and we aim to meet him tomorrow. Based on his directives, we will announce our final stance," Barrister Gohar said.

He added that significant progress was made in the discussions with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, bringing them closer to an agreement. "We had a detailed discussion with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, and we are nearly at a consensus," he noted.

Barrister Gohar also mentioned that representatives from both PTI and JUI-F participated in the Special Parliamentary Committee discussions on the amendment. PTI was represented by Aamir Dogar, while JUI-F also had its representatives present. The committee approved the draft amendment, which formed the basis for negotiations between PTI and JUI-F.

"We are hopeful that tomorrow, after receiving directions from Imran Khan, we will make a final announcement. For now, we have almost reached an agreement with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, which we will present to Imran Khan and share his guidance tomorrow," he said.

Responding to a question, Barrister Gohar clarified that Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari also made an appearance during the meeting. Although Bilawal greeted everyone, there was no discussion on the draft amendment with him. "Bilawal Bhutto arrived, and Maulana Fazlur Rehman gave him time. We exchanged pleasantries, but there was no conversation on the draft," he stated.

The PTI delegation met with Maulana Fazlur Rehman at his residence to discuss the proposed amendments. The delegation included Barrister Gohar, Omar Ayub, Asad Qaiser, Salman Akram Raja, Senator Allama Raja Nasir Abbas, and Sahibzada Hamid Raza.

Meanwhile, Bilawal Bhutto arrived at Maulana Fazlur Rehman's residence as the PTI delegation concluded their meeting. He was accompanied by PPP leaders Naveed Qamar, Murtaza Wahab, and Jameel Soomro. On Fazlur Rehman’s side, Abdul Ghafoor Haideri and Maulana Attaur Rehman were present.

Both leaders, Bilawal Bhutto and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, exchanged views on the proposed 26th Constitutional Amendment during their separate meeting.

This meeting comes amid significant political dialogue, as parties attempt to reach an agreement on the proposed amendments, which are expected to play a key role in Pakistan's future political framework.

tribune.com.pk

Final decision on constitutional amendments after Imran Khan’s directions: Gohar | The Express Tribune

We exchanged pleasantries with Bilawal at Fazl’s residence, but there was no conversation on the draft, says PTI chairman
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 
FearlessRoar said:

Final decision on constitutional amendments after Imran Khan’s directions: Gohar​


Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Barrister Gohar Ali Khan said on Friday that a consensus has been nearly reached with Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman regarding the 26th Constitutional Amendment, and a final announcement will be made after consultations with PTI founder Imran Khan.

Speaking to the media following a meeting with Maulana Fazlur Rehman in Islamabad, Barrister Gohar explained that PTI held a meeting with its allies, including the JUI-F chief, to discuss the constitutional amendments. He stated that there was a strong possibility of reaching an agreement during the previous talks, and Friday's meeting further solidified that understanding.

"We are still in talks. Once we finalise our position, we will seek Imran Khan’s instructions. Today, we will request a meeting with him, and we aim to meet him tomorrow. Based on his directives, we will announce our final stance," Barrister Gohar said.

He added that significant progress was made in the discussions with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, bringing them closer to an agreement. "We had a detailed discussion with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, and we are nearly at a consensus," he noted.

Barrister Gohar also mentioned that representatives from both PTI and JUI-F participated in the Special Parliamentary Committee discussions on the amendment. PTI was represented by Aamir Dogar, while JUI-F also had its representatives present. The committee approved the draft amendment, which formed the basis for negotiations between PTI and JUI-F.

"We are hopeful that tomorrow, after receiving directions from Imran Khan, we will make a final announcement. For now, we have almost reached an agreement with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, which we will present to Imran Khan and share his guidance tomorrow," he said.

Responding to a question, Barrister Gohar clarified that Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari also made an appearance during the meeting. Although Bilawal greeted everyone, there was no discussion on the draft amendment with him. "Bilawal Bhutto arrived, and Maulana Fazlur Rehman gave him time. We exchanged pleasantries, but there was no conversation on the draft," he stated.

The PTI delegation met with Maulana Fazlur Rehman at his residence to discuss the proposed amendments. The delegation included Barrister Gohar, Omar Ayub, Asad Qaiser, Salman Akram Raja, Senator Allama Raja Nasir Abbas, and Sahibzada Hamid Raza.

Meanwhile, Bilawal Bhutto arrived at Maulana Fazlur Rehman's residence as the PTI delegation concluded their meeting. He was accompanied by PPP leaders Naveed Qamar, Murtaza Wahab, and Jameel Soomro. On Fazlur Rehman’s side, Abdul Ghafoor Haideri and Maulana Attaur Rehman were present.

Both leaders, Bilawal Bhutto and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, exchanged views on the proposed 26th Constitutional Amendment during their separate meeting.

This meeting comes amid significant political dialogue, as parties attempt to reach an agreement on the proposed amendments, which are expected to play a key role in Pakistan's future political framework.

tribune.com.pk

Final decision on constitutional amendments after Imran Khan’s directions: Gohar | The Express Tribune

We exchanged pleasantries with Bilawal at Fazl’s residence, but there was no conversation on the draft, says PTI chairman
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
Click to expand...

Lol, the establishment is going to pass the original amendments in secrecy by banning all cell phones, videos in the assembly. These discussions on revised amendments are pointless and a waste of time.
 
Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari vowed on Friday that he will ensure the approval of the constitutional amendment with a two-thirds majority

Addressing the public gathering in Hyderabad, the former foreign minister said: “Maulana Fazlur Rehman can take the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on board. We would like to do the legislation by joining hands with all the political parties.”

At the outset of his speech, Bhutto-Zardari paid tribute to martyrs of the Karsaz tragedy, saying, “Today, we are recalling the date of October 18, 2007. The masses have made the Hyderabad gathering a historic one.”

“The JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman for the last time tonight in Islamabad,” he stated.

“I will return from Islamabad following the formation of the constitutional bench. The democracy will be at stake if the efforts of establishing the Constitution go in vain,” he stated.

Bhutto-Zardari said: “We will be compelled to do legislation if the opposition does not extend support despite the compromises.”

“I will present the draft of the constitutional amendment at the National Assembly myself,” he said.

Speaking about former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, Bhutto-Zardari said: “Benazir Bhutto had come to establish the rule of the masses by toppling the dictator. Benazir had returned to the country with the ideology and manifesto.”

Source: Samaa News
 
Full text: Draft of 26th constitutional amendment approved in committee

The draft of the constitutional amendments approved by the parliamentary special committee has been revealed.

PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto also confirmed that a consensus has been reached on the tweaks to the law while PTI chief Gohar Ali Khan claimed that the draft was the same that the party had reached a consensus on with JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman.

Following a consensus during the committee meeting on Friday, an 11-page draft has been finalised. The constitutional amendment has been named the “26th Amendment Act 2024.”

The proposed constitutional draft includes the addition of Article 9A (clean and healthy environment) and amendments to Articles 38 (promotion of social and economic well-being of the people), 48 (president to act on advice, etc), and 81 (expenditure charged upon Federal Consolidated Fund) of the Constitution.

According to the proposed amendment, no court will be able to question the recommendations sent to the president or the prime minister by the cabinet. The draft also includes a proposal to increase the number of members in the Judicial Commission of Pakistan by amending Article 175A (appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court, High Courts and the Federal Shariat Court).

According to the consensus draft, the Supreme Judicial Commission will include the chief justice, four senior judges from the Supreme Court and four members of Parliament. Among these, one senator and one member of the National Assembly will be nominated by the PM while another senator and another member will be nominated by the leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly.

The draft also suggests that the parliamentary committee responsible for judicial appointments will consist of 12 members, with eight from the National Assembly and four from the Senate.

Furthermore, instead of directly appointing a senior judge as chief justice of the Supreme Court, the proposal states that three names will be submitted to the parliamentary committee. This 12-member committee will recommend one of these names for the chief justice position. Subsequently, the prime minister will advise the President to issue a notification regarding the appointment.

The proposed draft also states that the term for the chief justice will be three years. If a Chief Justice reaches retirement age of 65 during this period, they will still be considered to have served a full three-year term.

Moreover, the draft outlines that if a high court judge’s performance is deemed unsatisfactory, the Supreme Judicial Council will provide the judge with an opportunity to improve. If the judge fails to enhance their performance within the designated timeframe, the matter will be addressed by the Supreme Judicial Council.

Furthermore, the agreement reached by the special parliamentary committee indicates that the Judicial Council can establish separate rules and regulations to evaluate the performance of judges.

The proposed draft suggests an amendment to Sub-clause 3 of Section 184 regarding the Supreme Court’s power to take suo motu notices. It states that the Supreme Court will not have the authority to take notice of any matter or to issue directions to any institution.

It further specifies that a three-member committee of Supreme Court judges, established under the Practice and Procedure Act, will make decisions regarding whether or not to take notice of a case.

The new draft of the proposed 26th constitutional amendment comprises 26 amendments. It also suggests the establishment of constitutional bench.

The proposed amendment also allows the SC to transfer cases from one high court to another if it believes that justice is not being served in an ongoing case.

Furthermore, the new draft proposes an amendment to Clause 1 of Article 199 of the Constitution, now referred to as Clause 1A, which pertains to the high court’s power to take suo motu notices.

The proposed amendment states that the high court shall not have the authority to take suo motu notices on any matter or issue directives to any institution.

It added that the judicial commission would determine the number of constitutional benches and judges, ensuring that, where possible, equal representation of judges from all provinces is maintained in the constitutional benches.

Additionally, an amendment to Article 203D of the Constitution has been proposed, mandating that any appeal must be resolved by the relevant high court within 12 months.

The special parliamentary committee’s consensus draft regarding the 26th amendment includes a proposal to add Article 191A to the Constitution, which pertains to the formation of constitutional benches.

This article suggests that the Supreme Judicial Commission will determine the number and duration of these constitutional benches, ensuring equal representation of judges from all provinces within them.

The proposed amendment stipulates that the powers held by a constitutional bench cannot be delegated to any other bench.

Additionally, the amendment states that the proceedings of the Judicial Commission related to the appointment of judges will be conducted in camera, although a record of these proceedings will be maintained.

SOURCE:https://english.aaj.tv/news/3303847...-cannot-nullify-decision-on-reserved-seats-sc
 
BouncerGuy said:
Full text: Draft of 26th constitutional amendment approved in committee

The draft of the constitutional amendments approved by the parliamentary special committee has been revealed.

PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto also confirmed that a consensus has been reached on the tweaks to the law while PTI chief Gohar Ali Khan claimed that the draft was the same that the party had reached a consensus on with JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman.

Following a consensus during the committee meeting on Friday, an 11-page draft has been finalised. The constitutional amendment has been named the “26th Amendment Act 2024.”

The proposed constitutional draft includes the addition of Article 9A (clean and healthy environment) and amendments to Articles 38 (promotion of social and economic well-being of the people), 48 (president to act on advice, etc), and 81 (expenditure charged upon Federal Consolidated Fund) of the Constitution.

According to the proposed amendment, no court will be able to question the recommendations sent to the president or the prime minister by the cabinet. The draft also includes a proposal to increase the number of members in the Judicial Commission of Pakistan by amending Article 175A (appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court, High Courts and the Federal Shariat Court).

According to the consensus draft, the Supreme Judicial Commission will include the chief justice, four senior judges from the Supreme Court and four members of Parliament. Among these, one senator and one member of the National Assembly will be nominated by the PM while another senator and another member will be nominated by the leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly.

The draft also suggests that the parliamentary committee responsible for judicial appointments will consist of 12 members, with eight from the National Assembly and four from the Senate.

Furthermore, instead of directly appointing a senior judge as chief justice of the Supreme Court, the proposal states that three names will be submitted to the parliamentary committee. This 12-member committee will recommend one of these names for the chief justice position. Subsequently, the prime minister will advise the President to issue a notification regarding the appointment.

The proposed draft also states that the term for the chief justice will be three years. If a Chief Justice reaches retirement age of 65 during this period, they will still be considered to have served a full three-year term.

Moreover, the draft outlines that if a high court judge’s performance is deemed unsatisfactory, the Supreme Judicial Council will provide the judge with an opportunity to improve. If the judge fails to enhance their performance within the designated timeframe, the matter will be addressed by the Supreme Judicial Council.

Furthermore, the agreement reached by the special parliamentary committee indicates that the Judicial Council can establish separate rules and regulations to evaluate the performance of judges.

The proposed draft suggests an amendment to Sub-clause 3 of Section 184 regarding the Supreme Court’s power to take suo motu notices. It states that the Supreme Court will not have the authority to take notice of any matter or to issue directions to any institution.

It further specifies that a three-member committee of Supreme Court judges, established under the Practice and Procedure Act, will make decisions regarding whether or not to take notice of a case.

The new draft of the proposed 26th constitutional amendment comprises 26 amendments. It also suggests the establishment of constitutional bench.

The proposed amendment also allows the SC to transfer cases from one high court to another if it believes that justice is not being served in an ongoing case.

Furthermore, the new draft proposes an amendment to Clause 1 of Article 199 of the Constitution, now referred to as Clause 1A, which pertains to the high court’s power to take suo motu notices.

The proposed amendment states that the high court shall not have the authority to take suo motu notices on any matter or issue directives to any institution.

It added that the judicial commission would determine the number of constitutional benches and judges, ensuring that, where possible, equal representation of judges from all provinces is maintained in the constitutional benches.

Additionally, an amendment to Article 203D of the Constitution has been proposed, mandating that any appeal must be resolved by the relevant high court within 12 months.

The special parliamentary committee’s consensus draft regarding the 26th amendment includes a proposal to add Article 191A to the Constitution, which pertains to the formation of constitutional benches.

This article suggests that the Supreme Judicial Commission will determine the number and duration of these constitutional benches, ensuring equal representation of judges from all provinces within them.

The proposed amendment stipulates that the powers held by a constitutional bench cannot be delegated to any other bench.

Additionally, the amendment states that the proceedings of the Judicial Commission related to the appointment of judges will be conducted in camera, although a record of these proceedings will be maintained.

SOURCE:https://english.aaj.tv/news/3303847...-cannot-nullify-decision-on-reserved-seats-sc
Click to expand...
Together the Nooras and PPP have less than 50 seats and laughably, they will pass a constitutional amendment at the behest of the establishment. The Bilawal and NS are both owned by the Mistry and will off course do as told but PK will lose. Bilawal has been promised the PMship but he has no support anywhere in PK. This amendment will be passed with bribes, kidnappings and threats. MNAs have been offered 50 crore+ but the Bilawal sees nothing wrong because The Mistry has asked him to get it passed and get his reward, sooner or later. All their form 47 reps have been hostage for nearly a month just in case they escape and not vote for this criminality
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Balochistan lawyers will protest if draft amendment ‘not withdrawn’

Senior lawyers from Balochistan have opposed the proposed 26th constitutional amendment and warned of countrywide protests if the government doesn’t withdraw its decision to table the legislation in the parliament.

Speaking at the joint press conference, Lawyers’ Joint Action Committee leaders said the Constitution was a social contract, and the public should have the authority to decide changes being made to it.

Ex-president of Supreme Court Bar Association Ali Ahmed Kurd, Pakistan Bar Council’s Rahib Ahmed Buledi and Balochistan Bar Association president Muhammad Afzal Harifal addressed the media.

They said lawyers had consistently raised their voices against dictators and martial law “even when political parties remained silent”.

“The most powerful pressure group in Pakistan is the lawyers, supported by civil society, students, and various segments of society,” Mr Kurd added.

They said most clauses in the constitutional amendment were related to the judiciary, and therefore, bar associations should be consulted on the issue.

“Today, courts are being undermined, and new courts are being created at will by those who lack constitutional legitimacy [and yet] are insisting on amending the Constitution,” Mr Kurd said.

He stressed that the existing Constitution has failed to provide basic rights to the people and that “thousands are missing” in Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and other regions.

Across Pakistan, lawyers are resisting the amendments, saying that they will “lead to devastation”.

“If Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz and the Pakistan People’s Party endorse [these amendments], their democratic credibility will be nullified,” Mr Kurd said, adding the role of JUI-F emir Maulana Fazlur Rehman on this issue was also “commendable”.

Mr Kurd claimed senators were being “blackmailed” to vote in favour of these constitutional amendments.

Advocate Buledi announced that the Karachi Lawyers’ Action Committee has announced a nationwide protest movement and stressed that constitutional amendments which concern the judiciary should be made in consultations with bar associations.

The lawyers also questioned the delay in issuing the notification of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s appointment as chief justice when the confirmation of the incumbent top judge, Qazi Faez Isa, was issued 88 days before his term started.

DAWN NEWS
 

Constitutional amendments: PTI delegation visits Fazl again​


A Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) delegation has once again visited Maulana Fazlur Rehman's residence to continue discussions on the proposed constitutional amendments.

The PTI delegation, led by Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, included prominent figures such as Barrister Salman Akram Raja, Asad Qaiser, and Barrister Syed Ali Zafar. They were also joined by Hamid Raza, chairman of the Sunni Ittehad Council, Express News reported.

During these talks, both sides engaged in detailed discussions on the ongoing constitutional reforms.

The series of meetings comes as consultations intensify, with other political leaders, including Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, also holding separate discussions with Maulana Fazlur Rehman on the matter.

Yesterday, Barrister Gohar stated that a consensus has been nearly reached with JUI-F chief Fazlur Rehman regarding the 26th Constitutional Amendment, and a final announcement will be made after consultations with PTI founder Imran Khan.

Speaking to the media following a meeting with Maulana Fazlur Rehman in Islamabad, Barrister Gohar explained that PTI held a meeting with its allies, including the JUI-F chief, to discuss the constitutional amendments.

He stated that there was a strong possibility of reaching an agreement during the previous talks, and Friday's meeting further solidified that understanding.

"We are still in talks. Once we finalise our position, we will seek Imran Khan’s instructions. Today, we will request a meeting with him, and we aim to meet him tomorrow. Based on his directives, we will announce our final stance," Barrister Gohar said.

Furthermore, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has cautioned the opposition that if his one last bid to persuade them to vote for the much-touted 26th constitutional amendment failed, he would go ahead with the option of amending the Constitution with a two-thirds majority.

Addressing a public meeting in Hyderabad on Friday, organized to commemorate the October 18, 2007 Karsaz bombing, Bilawal acknowledged that such a move might end up making the amendment controversial.

"I will return to Islamabad tonight to make a final try to convince the opposition," he said. "I will request Maulana sahib [Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F) chief Fazlur Rehman] one last time that this Constitution was enacted by your and our elders. Let's forget today's politics, today's circumstances and conflicts for the sake of the Constitution."

Bilawal reiterated that the PPP and the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government had agreed to the changes in the draft law as proposed by the JUI-F chief by giving up their demand for establishing a constitutional court in favour of a constitutional bench within the Supreme Court.

He added that they had also given up their demand to include Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa in that constitutional bench owing to rejection of his nomination by the opposition.

tribune.com.pk

Constitutional amendments: PTI delegation visits Maulana Fazlur Rehman again | The Express Tribune

PTI delegation also met with the JUI-F chief yesterday
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 

PTI undecided on supporting judicial package as meeting with jailed Imran remains 'inconclusive'​


Jailed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan on Saturday directed the party leaders to continue their deliberations on the proposed constitutional amendments with Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman.

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, while speaking during a press conference, said: "We held discussion over the amendments with the PTI founder and he has asked us to continue deliberation as it is very sensitive matter."

Gohar said that Khan also named four party members to accompany him on the consultations as "we want that I should form my opinion on a broader consensus and give further direction".

The PTI chairman said that the names are — Leader of the Opposition in National Assembly Omar Ayub, Leader of the Opposition in Senate Shibli Faraz, Leader of the Opposition in Punjab Assembly Ahmed Bhachar and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur.

The development comes a day after the special parliamentary committee — comprising government and opposition members "unanimously approved" the draft for 26th constitutional amendment.

Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) leader Farooq Sattar claimed that PTI had principally agreed on the draft but the party had reservations on some points.

However, Gohar had said that consultation on the fourth draft shared by the government was underway, adding that they would make final decision on the constitutional package after meeting Khan.

Gohar began the presser today by speaking about the PTI founder's health and the jail conditions, saying that he was in good health, however, there was no electricity in the jail for five days.

During the meeting, Barrister Gohar said, they informed the PTI founder about the meeting with Fazl after which Khan praised the JUI-F chief.

"We will continue to negotiate with Maulana Fazl. This type of legislation is not acceptable and we condemn this method as it is unconstitutional and undemocratic," he stressed.

Gohar said that they informed the JUI-F chief that the party will not be in a position to vote until the PTI founder gives clear instructions on the matter. "We have not agreed to anything at this point."

www.thenews.com.pk

PTI undecided on supporting judicial package as meeting with jailed Imran remains 'inconclusive'

Jailed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf founder Imran Khan on Saturday directed the party leaders to continue their deliberations on the proposed constitutional amendments with Jamiat...
www.thenews.com.pk www.thenews.com.pk
 
NA, Senate sessions yet to start despite govt claims of ‘numbers complete’ for constitutional package

Sessions of the National Assembly and Senate scheduled for Saturday were subject to considerable delay and yet to begin despite the federal government claiming that it had the required number of lawmakers to pass the much-touted 26th constitutional amendment.

After multiple delays, the federal government is expected to meet today (Saturday) to mull the judicial reform package. The Constitutional Package is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the chief justice’s term. A special parliamentary committee formed last month — which has the representation of all parties, including the PTI — has been discussing various proposals.

On October 11, the PPP made its proposals public, following which it and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) agreed on a shared draft of the amendments.

The federal cabinet was earlier scheduled to meet on Friday evening. However, it was later announced that a special cabinet meeting would take place on Saturday morning to approve the draft bill.

The 9:30am cabinet meeting today was again postponed till 10am, then till 12pm and was then supposed to meet at 2pm, seeing a total of four delays. The session has yet to begin.

According to a statement by the NA on its X account, yesterday’s session of the lower house of the parliament was adjourned till 3pm today. The Constitutional package is not part of the NA agenda, which was shared on X.

NA Speaker Ayaz Sadiq later changed the time for the assembly session to 7pm from 3pm. It was again later changed for the third time to 9:30pm.

The NA session did not begin on time.

The Senate session, initially set to resume at 12:30pm, was delayed to 3pm, then to 6:30pm and then for a fourth time to 8pm, according to notifications issued by its secretariat.

The Senate session did not begin on time despite the presence of some senators in their seats.

Addressing a press conference at Parliament House, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said the consultation process was still underway with the government striving to achieve a complete consensus on the issue.

Recounting the various political meetings occurring in the past few days, Tarar said: “Despite the numbers and homework being complete, the attempt was made not to stop the consultation process and achieve broader consensus because when a constitutional amendment takes place, it is our obligation to not only bring all political parties onboard but have a fruitful debate on every clause to take it to a logical conclusion.”

He reiterated that the consultation was “speedily under way” and was further hastened with the government aiming to complete it at any cost today. He claimed that no prior amendment was subject to as much debate as the current one.

“As [PPP Chairman] Bilawal [Bhutto-Zardari] said yesterday. We have other options present but we are democratic-minded people and it is our effort to move forward on this matter after a complete consensus.”

Source: Dawn News
 
So Dr. ZARQA a PTI loyal and passionate vocalist for IK has ditched him and reportedly Saif Abro the other senator will vote for ammen.

Still 5 more PTI reps. are missing or flipping , add to the chaos 7 govt. Members are trying to loaf during the ammen. creating panic within their ranks.

2x Senators of BNP are under the pump or are deliberately playing games in order to vote for ammen.

Faisal Vawda a senator and not from any party has vowed to pass ammen. tonight by hook or crook.

Bilawal is also itching to get the amme .done regardless of the manner whether it remains within the boundary of mannerism and social acceptance.

Pakistan has completEly disfigured its political face and the Junta is leaving no stone unturned to make mockery of rule and law.
 
Even if they don’t have the numbers to pass it through senate, what’s stopping them from “miscounting” the votes?
 
Constitutional package no show as NA session begins after many delays and adjourns before midnight

The government’s constitutional amendments were missing in action as Saturday’s National Assembly session finally began after many delays from its scheduled time but was subsequently adjourned before midnight.

The Senate session also began but was adjourned around midnight for 30 minutes.

After multiple delays, the federal government was expected to meet today (Saturday) to mull the judicial reform package. The Constitutional Package is legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the chief justice’s term. A special parliamentary committee formed last month — which has the representation of all parties, including the PTI — has been discussing various proposals.

On October 11, the PPP made its proposals public, following which it and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) agreed on a shared draft of the amendments.

The federal cabinet was earlier scheduled to meet on Friday evening. However, it was later announced that a special cabinet meeting would take place on Saturday morning to approve the draft bill.

The 9:30am cabinet meeting today was again postponed till 10am, then till 12pm and was then supposed to meet at 2pm, seeing a total of four delays. The session did not take place.

According to a statement by the NA on its X account, yesterday’s session of the lower house of the parliament was adjourned till 3pm today. The Constitutional package is not part of the NA agenda, which was shared on X.

NA Speaker Ayaz Sadiq later changed the time for the assembly session to 7pm from 3pm. It was again later changed for the third time to 9:30pm.

The NA session began around 11:50pm. It was shortly after adjourned for 11:30am on Sunday by Deputy Speaker Syed Ghulam
Mustafa Shah.

The Senate session, initially set to resume at 12:30pm, was delayed to 3pm, then to 6:30pm and then for a fourth time to 8pm, according to notifications issued by its secretariat.

The Senate session did not begin on time despite the presence of some senators in their seats. It finally began at 11pm with 37 members present under the chairmanship of Senate Deputy Chairman Syedaal Khan.

Source: Dawn News
 
Kianig89 said:
So Dr. ZARQA a PTI loyal and passionate vocalist for IK has ditched him and reportedly Saif Abro the other senator will vote for ammen.

Still 5 more PTI reps. are missing or flipping , add to the chaos 7 govt. Members are trying to loaf during the ammen. creating panic within their ranks.

2x Senators of BNP are under the pump or are deliberately playing games in order to vote for ammen.

Faisal Vawda a senator and not from any party has vowed to pass ammen. tonight by hook or crook.

Bilawal is also itching to get the amme .done regardless of the manner whether it remains within the boundary of mannerism and social acceptance.

Pakistan has completEly disfigured its political face and the Junta is leaving no stone unturned to make mockery of rule and law.
Click to expand...
Money they will get, but peace they won't. Cash buys materials, but the soul requires spirituality, betrayal is your game but for every Mir Jaffar, there is a Tipu Sultan.
 
JUI-F chief, Maulana Fazlur Rehman, has stated that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has requested time until tomorrow (Sunday) to finalise its stance on the constitutional amendment.

He aded that after receiving their response, the bill will be presented in parliament for consensus approval

Speaking at a joint press conference with Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari in Islamabad on Saturday, Fazlur Rehman said, "After extensive consultations, Bilawal and I are here to update you. The consensus reached on the constitutional amendment bill by PPP and JUI-F was first shared during a press conference in Karachi. We then discussed it with the leadership of PML-N in Lahore, leading to further consultations."

He explained that the initial draft of the amendment was rejected due to concerns raised by opposition parties. "The government agreed to withdraw all the contentious sections we objected to, paving the way for consensus. At this stage, there are no major disputes between us, and most of the contentious issues have been resolved," Fazl noted.

Fazlur Rehman emphasised that PTI had been kept in the loop throughout the process, saying, "For over a month, we have taken PTI into confidence and continued consultations with them. They were also informed of the negotiations with the government."

Regarding PTI's recent actions, he stated, "The draft of the constitutional amendment bill was finalised from our side, but PTI’s leadership in Islamabad requested a meeting with Imran Khan to secure his approval on the consensus. After the meeting, PTI held a press conference, expressing dissatisfaction with the government's behaviour. However, I received a message from Imran Khan, indicating a positive approach."

Fazl added that PTI needed time to consult its senior parliamentarians and leadership. "They have asked for time until tomorrow, and we expect their response soon."

Addressing the overall progress, the JUI-F leader remarked, "We have no major grievances with the government on this issue now. Once the schedule for parliament sessions is set, we will table the bill with consensus and inform the nation about the progress."

Bilawal Bhutto, expressing optimism, stated, "The work done by the teams of PPP and JUI-F is before you. All political parties have endorsed the agreement on constitutional reforms. Maulana Fazlur Rehman has given all parties time until tomorrow, and I am confident that opposition parties will respond positively, as their concerns have been addressed through the amendment."


Bilawal added, "I am hopeful that Maulana will convince them. Once the parliament convenes, I wish for the JUI-F to present the bill. Both the coalition government and opposition should support it, just as we passed the 18th Amendment with overwhelming consensus. Similarly, I hope the 26th constitutional amendment will be approved in the same manner."

Source: The Express Tribune
 
The Bald Eagle said:
JUI-F chief, Maulana Fazlur Rehman, has stated that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has requested time until tomorrow (Sunday) to finalise its stance on the constitutional amendment.

He aded that after receiving their response, the bill will be presented in parliament for consensus approval

Speaking at a joint press conference with Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari in Islamabad on Saturday, Fazlur Rehman said, "After extensive consultations, Bilawal and I are here to update you. The consensus reached on the constitutional amendment bill by PPP and JUI-F was first shared during a press conference in Karachi. We then discussed it with the leadership of PML-N in Lahore, leading to further consultations."

He explained that the initial draft of the amendment was rejected due to concerns raised by opposition parties. "The government agreed to withdraw all the contentious sections we objected to, paving the way for consensus. At this stage, there are no major disputes between us, and most of the contentious issues have been resolved," Fazl noted.

Fazlur Rehman emphasised that PTI had been kept in the loop throughout the process, saying, "For over a month, we have taken PTI into confidence and continued consultations with them. They were also informed of the negotiations with the government."

Regarding PTI's recent actions, he stated, "The draft of the constitutional amendment bill was finalised from our side, but PTI’s leadership in Islamabad requested a meeting with Imran Khan to secure his approval on the consensus. After the meeting, PTI held a press conference, expressing dissatisfaction with the government's behaviour. However, I received a message from Imran Khan, indicating a positive approach."

Fazl added that PTI needed time to consult its senior parliamentarians and leadership. "They have asked for time until tomorrow, and we expect their response soon."

Addressing the overall progress, the JUI-F leader remarked, "We have no major grievances with the government on this issue now. Once the schedule for parliament sessions is set, we will table the bill with consensus and inform the nation about the progress."

Bilawal Bhutto, expressing optimism, stated, "The work done by the teams of PPP and JUI-F is before you. All political parties have endorsed the agreement on constitutional reforms. Maulana Fazlur Rehman has given all parties time until tomorrow, and I am confident that opposition parties will respond positively, as their concerns have been addressed through the amendment."


Bilawal added, "I am hopeful that Maulana will convince them. Once the parliament convenes, I wish for the JUI-F to present the bill. Both the coalition government and opposition should support it, just as we passed the 18th Amendment with overwhelming consensus. Similarly, I hope the 26th constitutional amendment will be approved in the same manner."

Source: The Express Tribune
Click to expand...
It's a country for 250mn people but no one bar the Junta knows what's in it. Lots of speculation about article 8, judges etc but these guys have such contempt for PK people.
 
Federal cabinet approves 26th Constitutional amendments

The federal cabinet approved the draft of the much-awaited 26th constitutional amendment Sunday.

Federal cabinet meeting chaired by the Prime Minister.

After this, the Constitutional Amendments will be presented in the National Assembly and the Senate.

Source: Samaa TV
 

Talking to PTI about constitutional amendments is waste of time: Azma Bokhari​


Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari has stated that discussing constitutional amendments with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) is 'a waste of time.'

In a statement, Azma Bokhari said that no institution other than the parliament has the authority to interpret the constitution according to its own preferences, and the establishment of the constitutional court is being carried out according to the Charter of Democracy.

She further remarked that when a PTI delegation went to Adiala Jail to discuss constitutional amendments, their leader spent 45 minutes complaining about his grievances, Express News reported.

According to Azma, the PTI founder is seeking an NRO (deal) in exchange for constitutional amendments, which he will not get.

The information minister added that even after spending a year in jail, the PTI leader's mindset remains that of a disruptive group's ringleader. She criticised him for calling those individuals traitors, whom he had relied on to become the prime minister.

She also pointed out that revolutions are not brought about by drinking coconut and beetroot juice in jail. She further said many PTI members are fed up with the founder's anti-state activities, and he wishes for another event like May 9, which will not be allowed to happen.

Azma Bokhari concluded by stating that the Supreme Court's role goes beyond merely issuing decisions or explanations, and while reaching a consensus on constitutional amendments is a good step, she believes that engaging with PTI on the matter is simply a waste of time.

PTI Announces Boycott of 26th Constitutional Amendments Vote

The PTI has decided to boycott the voting process on the 26th Constitutional Amendments in both the National Assembly and Senate.

The decision was made during a meeting of the party's political committee, where it was agreed that PTI would not participate in what they described as a "non-transparent" and "controversial" process.

In a statement, PTI argued that the current government lacks the moral, democratic, and constitutional authority to amend the constitution.

The party accused the ruling coalition of undermining democracy by imposing what it called the "law of the jungle" through these amendments, declaring a complete boycott of the vote.

tribune.com.pk

Tarar says alternatives exist for constitutional amendments' approval | The Express Tribune

Information minister maintains all preparations for the amendments have been finalised
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 
FearlessRoar said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1847958812654985622
Click to expand...
That's because the cabinet approved something it hasn't even seen. In any sane country the constitutional amendment is debated for months with full input from civil society and the media. Here the mafia will pass a constitutional amendment that no one will see until it's passed. Where are the guys that supported the mafia. Do you know what's in the constitutional amendment, why has it been passed?

@Major
@Mamoon
@emranabbas
@mazkhan
 

Maulana Fazlur Rehman to back 26th Constitutional Amendment​


Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman has assured the government that his party will support the constitutional amendment in parliament.

The deadlock between the government and Maulana Fazlur Rehman has been resolved, Express News reported.

The JUI-F leader instructed his party’s senators to back the government’s bill, urging full support for the amendment in both the National Assembly and the Senate.

"We will support the amendment draft that was presented after consultation with us," Maulana Fazlur Rehman stated.

Following the JUI-F chief's announcement, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari stated that whether Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) supports it or not, their aim is to complete the task today under any circumstances.

Speaking to the media at Parliament House, Bilawal expressed disappointment over PTI's reaction following the press conference held by him and Maulana Fazlur Rehman.

He further said, "Congratulations to everyone on the 26th Constitutional Amendment day; there is no contentious point left in this amendment."

Bilawal added that he contacted Maulana Fazlur Rehman over the phone and expressed his gratitude, saying, "No amount of thanks is enough for Maulana. His role will be remembered in history. I'm grateful that he instructed his senators to ensure their presence for the amendment."

Furthermore, the Federal Cabinet has approved the 26th Constitutional Amendment bill during a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif at the Parliament House.

During the cabinet meeting held earlier on Saturday night, the constitutional amendment bill was discussed, with Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari providing a briefing after meeting with Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) Chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on a special invitation.

Cabinet approval for constitutional or legal bills is a legal requirement, necessitating the ongoing cabinet meeting.

Meanhile, strict security arrangements have been made for today’s session of Pakistan’s National Assembly, with guest entry strictly prohibited, according to the Assembly's spokesperson.

Only media representatives holding full-session press gallery cards issued by the Directorate General of Media, National Assembly Secretariat, will be allowed to enter Parliament House, Express News reported. In a move to tighten regulations, the issuance of one-day press gallery cards has been halted.

Meanwhile, the National Assembly’s 9-point agenda for today’s session has also been released.

Today’s National Assembly session will begin at 6 pm, while the Senate session was scheduled for 3 pm.

However, earlier today PTI decided to boycott the voting process in the National Assembly and Senate concerning the 26th Constitutional Amendments.

The decision was announced in a statement following a meeting of the party's political committee.

tribune.com.pk

Deadlock resolved as Fazlur Rehman agrees to back constitutional amendment | The Express Tribune

JUI-F will vote in favour of the constitutional amendment
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 

Tarar says alternatives exist for constitutional amendments' approval​


Federal Information Minister Attaullah Tarar has stated that there are alternative options available for the approval of constitutional amendments. He made these remarks during an informal conversation with journalists ahead of the cabinet meeting in Islamabad on Sunday.

He maintained that all preparations for the amendments had been finalised. The minister added that while the government’s priority is to move forward with consensus on the constitutional amendments, they are prepared with other options if needed.

A National Assembly session is scheduled for 6 pm today, during which the draft of the constitutional amendment is expected to be approved. According to sources, cabinet approval of constitutional or legal bills is a legal requirement, and the meeting has been convened for this purpose.

Meanwhile, Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari has stated that discussing constitutional amendments with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) is 'a waste of time.'

In a statement, Azma Bokhari said that no institution other than the parliament has the authority to interpret the constitution according to its own preferences, and the establishment of the constitutional court is being carried out according to the Charter of Democracy.

She further remarked that when a PTI delegation went to Adiala Jail to discuss constitutional amendments, their leader spent 45 minutes complaining about his grievances, Express News reported.

According to Azma, the PTI founder is seeking an NRO (deal) in exchange for constitutional amendments, which he will not get.

The information minister added that even after spending a year in jail, the PTI leader's mindset remains that of a disruptive group's ringleader. She criticised him for calling those individuals traitors, whom he had relied on to become the prime minister.

She also pointed out that revolutions are not brought about by drinking coconut and beetroot juice in jail. She further said many PTI members are fed up with the founder's anti-state activities, and he wishes for another event like May 9, which will not be allowed to happen.

Azma Bokhari concluded by stating that the Supreme Court's role goes beyond merely issuing decisions or explanations, and while reaching a consensus on constitutional amendments is a good step, she believes that engaging with PTI on the matter is simply a waste of time.

tribune.com.pk

Tarar says alternatives exist for constitutional amendments' approval | The Express Tribune

Information minister maintains all preparations for the amendments have been finalised
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 

Law minister presents 26th Constitutional Amendment in Senate​


Federal Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar presented the 26th constitutional amendment bill in the Senate on Sunday, seeking to reform the process for judicial appointments.

During his address, he stated that a committee had been established at the Speaker's directive to thoroughly review the amendment. He urged the Senate to take up the bill, which has been included in the supplementary agenda.

The law minister highlighted that the procedures for appointing judges to the higher judiciary were introduced in the 18th Amendment to ensure transparency. He mentioned that a parliamentary committee was empowered to block any nominations.

However, he noted that a petition was filed in the Supreme Court, leading to an urgent 19th Amendment that altered the composition of the Judicial Commission, shifting its focus towards one institution.

"Bar Councils expressed concerns regarding the procedures for appointing judges of the higher judiciary," Tarar said, adding that the Supreme Court Bar Association demanded an amendment to Article 175(3) of the Constitution. He outlined that the proposed Judicial Commission would be chaired by a Supreme Court judge and include four parliament members.

The Chief Justice and judges from the constitutional court will also be part of the commission. "The Judicial Commission will have the authority to form constitutional benches," he added.

Additionally, Tarar stated that the cabinet had decided to vote on amendments proposed by Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) to foster broader consensus during the 18th Amendment discussions. He also mentioned that the Speaker of the National Assembly would recommend a non-Muslim representative for the commission.

tribune.com.pk

Law minister presents 26th Constitutional Amendment in Senate | The Express Tribune

Azam Nazeer Tarar shares proposed Judicial Commission would be chaired by a SC judge, include four parliament members
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 
FearlessRoar said:

Law minister presents 26th Constitutional Amendment in Senate​


Federal Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar presented the 26th constitutional amendment bill in the Senate on Sunday, seeking to reform the process for judicial appointments.

During his address, he stated that a committee had been established at the Speaker's directive to thoroughly review the amendment. He urged the Senate to take up the bill, which has been included in the supplementary agenda.

The law minister highlighted that the procedures for appointing judges to the higher judiciary were introduced in the 18th Amendment to ensure transparency. He mentioned that a parliamentary committee was empowered to block any nominations.

However, he noted that a petition was filed in the Supreme Court, leading to an urgent 19th Amendment that altered the composition of the Judicial Commission, shifting its focus towards one institution.

"Bar Councils expressed concerns regarding the procedures for appointing judges of the higher judiciary," Tarar said, adding that the Supreme Court Bar Association demanded an amendment to Article 175(3) of the Constitution. He outlined that the proposed Judicial Commission would be chaired by a Supreme Court judge and include four parliament members.

The Chief Justice and judges from the constitutional court will also be part of the commission. "The Judicial Commission will have the authority to form constitutional benches," he added.

Additionally, Tarar stated that the cabinet had decided to vote on amendments proposed by Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) to foster broader consensus during the 18th Amendment discussions. He also mentioned that the Speaker of the National Assembly would recommend a non-Muslim representative for the commission.

tribune.com.pk

Law minister presents 26th Constitutional Amendment in Senate | The Express Tribune

Azam Nazeer Tarar shares proposed Judicial Commission would be chaired by a SC judge, include four parliament members
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
Click to expand...
The constitutional amendment is being carried out by guys that didn't win 50 seats, got smashed in the elections and couldn't win their own seats. It has been done at the behest of establishment and it has 3 aims. It will stop the form 47 criminals from defeated and deseated, it will end judicial independence and keep IK in jail so that PK people don't see their choice as PM. The beghairati of these criminals voting for a constitutional amendment they haven't even seen, is historic and won't be forgotten. Bilawal and NS are officially nationalised and can't break wind without permission
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Senate passes 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill amid PTI boycott​


After several delays, the Senate commenced voting on the 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill, also known as the Constitutional Package, and eventially passed it on Sunday. The legislation proposes a series of amendments, including an extension of the Chief Justice’s term.

The bill, which had been previously approved by the federal cabinet with the consensus of coalition partners, was presented in the Senate by Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar. During the opening of the session, Senate Chairman Yousaf Raza Gilani read out the contents of the amendment bill before lawmakers cast their votes.

Amid speculation regarding the extension of the Chief Justice’s tenure, Tarar clarified that Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa had expressed no interest in extending his term. “During the three meetings that I had with the top judge, he reiterated his disinterest in the extension of his tenure, saying that any amendments would come into effect after his retirement,” Tarar stated.

Before the Senate session, Tarar addressed a press conference at Parliament House, accompanied by Information Minister Attaullah Tarar. He elaborated on the bill’s contents, noting that a constitutional bench would be formed by a judicial commission led by the Chief Justice of Pakistan.

“Before the 18th Amendment, judges were appointed by the President on the advice of the PM,” he explained. The proposed commission, referred to as the ‘new-face’ commission, will include the Chief Justice, four senior-most Supreme Court judges, two senators, and two MNAs—one from the opposition and one from the treasury.

“We are aiming to achieve a broader consensus with this commission,” he added. The minister further stated that the attorney general would also be part of the commission.

Tarar highlighted the need for representation of marginalised communities, stating, “Those whose fundamental rights need to be enforced, such as women and minorities, will be appointed by the National Assembly Speaker.” He also mentioned the intention to include a technocrat from outside parliament to provide input based on experience.

He further announced the introduction of a performance evaluation system for the provincial judiciary. He addressed public complaints about protracted legal proceedings, noting that cases could remain pending for up to ten years. “This judicial commission needs to enforce a nationwide standard, so the performance of high court judges will be evaluated,” he said.

“We need to appreciate the judges who perform well, but in the past, we have received complaints that after confirmation, their work is inadequate,” he continued, adding, “We need to ensure that taxpayers’ money is being well spent, and when the judiciary is receiving such perks, we expect results.” Cases deemed inefficient will be referred to the Supreme Judicial Council for further review, he maintained.

 
I think in US also they appoint their chief justice through senate committee recommendations. Its a good step forward for Pakistan. It will benefit all parties who will come in power in future
 
Bewal Express said:
The constitutional amendment is being carried out by guys that didn't win 50 seats, got smashed in the elections and couldn't win their own seats. It has been done at the behest of establishment and it has 3 aims. It will stop the form 47 criminals from defeated and deseated, it will end judicial independence and keep IK in jail so that PK people don't see their choice as PM. The beghairati of these criminals voting for a constitutional amendment they haven't even seen, is historic and won't be forgotten. Bilawal and NS are officially nationalised and can't break wind without permission
Click to expand...
Forget the 47 seats— the establishment didn’t even spare the full majority win of the PML-N government in the 2013 elections, and eventually, they had to bow to the power of the establishment. Nawaz was ousted, and Khaqan was appointed as Prime Minister after the army’s approval.

I like Sohail Warraich’s words, which summarize Pakistan’s politics in a single sentence: ‘In Pakistan, to come to power, both popularity and acceptability are necessary.’
 
adi_62941 said:
Forget the 47 seats— the establishment didn’t even spare the full majority win of the PML-N government in the 2013 elections, and eventually, they had to bow to the power of the establishment. Nawaz was ousted, and Khaqan was appointed as Prime Minister after the army’s approval.

I like Sohail Warraich’s words, which summarize Pakistan’s politics in a single sentence: ‘In Pakistan, to come to power, both popularity and acceptability are necessary.’
Click to expand...
True. But after 75 years of experimenting our establishment in all their guises have achieved zilch. We don't have a single functioning institution- from the army to the SC, we have nothing that works. The ISI play games and feel very clever but we have 100s of terrorist attacks each year and apparently, they see their job as kidnapping politicians and their families to get illegal things done. And the worst thing is they don't care as long as they are OK.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
adi_62941 said:
I think in US also they appoint their chief justice through senate committee recommendations. Its a good step forward for Pakistan. It will benefit all parties who will come in power in future
Click to expand...
Look at niyaat why it was done and you will realise that in reality it's a tool to keep criminals in control.
 
Bewal Express said:
Look at niyaat why it was done and you will realise that in reality it's a tool to keep criminals in control.
Click to expand...
Yes the short term result they want to get is to dismantle IK ideology at their earliest and give IK the toughest sentence that he will not be able to come out of jail in his life. I also feel that he will not be able to come out of jail in his life.
But eventually they will not be able to win people interest until unless they bring heavy reforms for public which is not possible in near future
 
Bewal Express said:
True. But after 75 years of experimenting our Generals in all their guises have achieved zilch. We don't have a single functioning institution- from the army to the SC, we have nothing that works. The ISI play games and feel very clever but we have 100s of terrorist attacks each year and apparently, they see their job as kidnapping politicians and their families to get illegal things done. And the worst thing is they don't care as long as they are OK.
Click to expand...
I will blame people of Pakistan because we are not one nation but a jhund of different castes, religious sects etc. look at india, they are also same but when it comes to their national interest they behave like a nation. Why cant pakistan people come out against all this
 
adi_62941 said:
Yes the short term result they want to get is to dismantle IK ideology at their earliest and give IK the toughest sentence that he will not be able to come out of jail in his life. I also feel that he will not be able to come out of jail in his life.
But eventually they will not be able to win people interest until unless they bring heavy reforms for public which is not possible in near future
Click to expand...
I agree they are too scared of IK to let him out. He is PK peoples zid and they can't control the people or him. But things are not linear and even Mush got a death sentence and compared to these thugs he was sane and tame. These crooks have committed lots of crimes from kidnapping to murder. The Mistry is loving play God but Allah has no partners and he will go the way of all the criminals before him.
 

Judicial reforms to block future appointments like Saqib Nisar, Gulzar Ahmed: Aimal Wali Khan​


Awami National Party (ANP) leader Aimal Wali Khan took aim at Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) during a Senate session on the 26th Constitutional Amendment, criticising the former ruling party for its opposition to judicial reforms.

“These amendments will ensure that judges like Saqib Nisar and Gulzar Ahmed won’t return,” Khan said, adding that the country needs judges like Justice Qazi Faez Isa.

He further remarked, "Decisions that were once made under the influence of mothers-in-law will no longer happen."

Khan stated that the proposed amendments would reflect parliamentary supremacy, claiming they would prevent future interference in judicial appointments.

He noted that PTI members, particularly Senator Ali Zafar, attended committee meetings on the reforms but failed to offer any substantial suggestions.

He further emphasised, "We agreed on 26 points, and action must be taken against those responsible for the attacks on defence installations on May 9, regardless of our grievances with defence institutions."

He added that ANP, despite suffering under state oppression, had never targeted defence installations.

Khan also criticised the KP government, calling it ineffective and accusing it of creating unnecessary drama. He noted, "If given the chance, they would shut down the entire country."

The ANP leader concluded by saying that all provisions harmful to the public had been removed from the proposed amendments.

tribune.com.pk

Judicial reforms to block future appointments like Saqib Nisar, Gulzar Ahmed: Aimal Wali Khan | The Express Tribune

Country needs judges like Justice Qazi Faez Isa, ANP chief
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 
Bewal Express said:
I agree they are too scared of IK to let him out. He is PK peoples zid and they can't control the people or him. But things are not linear and even Mush got a death sentence and compared to these thugs he was sane and tame. These crooks have committed lots of crimes from kidnapping to murder. The Mistry is loving play God but Allah has no partners and he will go the way of all the criminals before him.
Click to expand...
The only option for IK to get out of jail is to strike a good deal with the establishment, and I think he has already missed that chance. He cannot fight the system alone. He should look at Nawaz and Zardari and learn from how they escaped the establishment’s grip, only to repeat the cycle of attacking and blaming them again.
He is now attempting the impossible, something he has done throughout his life with some success, but politics is a different game.
 
adi_62941 said:
The only option for IK to get out of jail is to strike a good deal with the establishment, and I think he has already missed that chance. He cannot fight the system alone. He should look at Nawaz and Zardari and learn from how they escaped the establishment’s grip, only to repeat the cycle of attacking and blaming them again.
He is now attempting the impossible, something he has done throughout his life with some success, but politics is a different game.
Click to expand...
He won't. If he was going to do it, he would have done it. His demise will also be the death sentence of these crooks. Deep down he knows that he won't come out but without him coming out with his 90% support means that these thugs will never get peace of mind.
 
PTI says 12 parliamentarians missing before 26th amendment passage

Ahead of the passage of the 26th constitutional amendment, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf has claimed that 12 of its party leaders – including 10 MNAs and two Senators – have disappeared.

The party said it had lost contact with 10 members of the National Assembly and two members of the Senate.

In this regard, Omar Ayub confirmed that he has not contacted seven members, while PTI chairman Barrister Gohar has also said that he has not been able to contact two senators.

Sources said Zain Qureshi, Zahoor Qureshi, Aslam Ghaman, Usman Ali, Riaz Fitiana, Muqdad Hussain, Chaudhry Ilyas, Aurangzeb Khichi and Mubarak Zaib Khan have not been in contact with the party

On the other hand, PTI has suffered a setback on the Senate front with two of its senators leaving the party in difficult time.

Party chairman Barrister Gohar confirmed that Senator Faisal Salim and Zarqa Taimur Shahid have sided with the government to vote in the support of the constitutional amendment bill.
`

dunyanews.tv

PTI says 12 parliamentarians missing before 26th amendment passage

PTI claims 12 party leaders missing ahead of passage of 26th amendment
dunyanews.tv dunyanews.tv
 
Moeed Pirzada commented in a recent Vlog when IK was fired upon in November 2022, he should have realized the extent to which the millitary establishment consider him persona non gratta and that position was unlikely to change anytime soon, he should have used the leg wound as an excuse to go abroad for a few years like Sharif did and wait for things with the establishment (Both local and international) to improve and that he would have been able to champion Pakistan's cause better from abroad with his powerful support with overseas Pakistani's. He also commented that the perception of IK going abroad for respite would not have been viewed in the same light as Sharif or Bhutto, Zardari going abroad.

Hope IK and PTI learn a very harsh lesson in the Pakistani environment i.e. power and control over the state machinery in Pakistan is everything, when you are in power, make the most of it and show no mercy to the opposition because if you don't then you will be history the moment you are on the receiving end.

The moment the Sharif's got a chance back into power, they made sure they installed their own army chief who will transform the institution to serve them like Punjab Police against their opponents.
 
adi_62941 said:
The only option for IK to get out of jail is to strike a good deal with the establishment, and I think he has already missed that chance. He cannot fight the system alone. He should look at Nawaz and Zardari and learn from how they escaped the establishment’s grip, only to repeat the cycle of attacking and blaming them again.
He is now attempting the impossible, something he has done throughout his life with some success, but politics is a different game.
Click to expand...

PTI without IK is absolutely nothing. The current PTI senior leadership is heavily dependent on IK's goodwill and instructions, they cant operate without his approval, blessings and the support from the workers is based on their love and belief in their leader. Remove IK from the picture and PTI collapses with him. If the establishment wants to keep a third force to keep the PML N and PPP in check then that cannot be achieved with a PTI leadership without IK as they don't have his pull with the masses.
 
It may look like a doomsday and the crooks might be having the time of their lives but it is a short term mimic. There is light at the end of the tunnel, the change is inevitable. The status quo will collapse. The corrupt old babays are on their last legs desperately trying to save their atm.

The fake amendments can only buy the mafia time. In the long term - IK will win in destroying the status quo. It might be hard to believe what I’m saying, you can always bump this post when the day comes.

Noon league will be done and dusted and dead. PPP will be confined to interior Sindh. I’m sad today but happy and hopeful for the future.
 
There are a total of 15 people who betrayed PTI and IK i.e. 13 MNA's including SMQ's Son Zain and 2 Senators.

PTI is filled with sell outs and betrayers. The Actions of Gandapur, Gohar, Ali Muhammad Khan, Asad Qaiser have all been questionable for a while. The avg PTI supporter and voter only believes in IK, the others don't matter one bit.
 
UP said:
It may look like a doomsday and the crooks might be having the time of their lives but it is a short term mimic. There is light at the end of the tunnel, the change is inevitable. The status quo will collapse. The corrupt old babays are on their last legs desperately trying to save their atm.

The fake amendments can only buy the mafia time. In the long term - IK will win in destroying the status quo. It might be hard to believe what I’m saying, you can always bump this post when the day comes.

Noon league will be done and dusted and dead. PPP will be confined to interior Sindh. I’m sad today but happy and hopeful for the future.
Click to expand...

It appears the end of IK is nigh, only a matter of time before Munir instructs his execution, assassination.
 
Savak said:
It appears the end of IK is nigh, only a matter of time before Munir instructs his execution, assassination.
Click to expand...
I don’t think Munir has the balls to take out IK. Will perhaps keep IK in prison for as long as possible. Munir will never be able to live in peace fearing somebody will take him out when he will be out and done.

As I said, the change is inevitable. Doesn’t matter what happens. IK’s role was to destroy and weaken the status quo - which he has done for the long term. You guys will have to keep your hopes up and let the nature do its work.
 
Savak said:
There are a total of 15 people who betrayed PTI and IK i.e. 13 MNA's including SMQ's Son Zain and 2 Senators.

PTI is filled with sell outs and betrayers. The Actions of Gandapur, Gohar, Ali Muhammad Khan, Asad Qaiser have all been questionable for a while. The avg PTI supporter and voter only believes in IK, the others don't matter one bit.
Click to expand...
Nobody cares about Gohar or Gandapur or whoever. Only IK matters to people.

Zain Qureshi was a big surprise and out of the blue lootmaar sale. It reminded me of Shahbaz Gill’s vlog where he mentioned anybody can be bought in Pak.
 
UP said:
Nobody cares about Gohar or Gandapur or whoever. Only IK matters to people.

Zain Qureshi was a big surprise and out of the blue lootmaar sale. It reminded me of Shahbaz Gill’s vlog where he mentioned anybody can be bought in Pak.
Click to expand...

This indicates that SMQ is compromised and is part of the establishment Minus 1 PTI plan
 
I voted yes, simply because this ammendment seems to provide more strength to Army. I have completely given up hope that pakistan can ever be a fully democratic country which is led by civilians. Army seems to have too much control and people seem to be perfectly happy about it based on lack of protest to get IK out. Clearly they feel confident, strong and have hope with army in the fray. If that is the case let's pull the band-aid and give the army the legitimacy they need so that we will atleast have a stable pakistan. A stable pakistan under hybrid army rule is much better than a unstable chaotic one. Best of luck
 
FearlessRoar said:

Senate passes 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill amid PTI boycott​


After several delays, the Senate commenced voting on the 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill, also known as the Constitutional Package, and eventially passed it on Sunday. The legislation proposes a series of amendments, including an extension of the Chief Justice’s term.

The bill, which had been previously approved by the federal cabinet with the consensus of coalition partners, was presented in the Senate by Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar. During the opening of the session, Senate Chairman Yousaf Raza Gilani read out the contents of the amendment bill before lawmakers cast their votes.

Amid speculation regarding the extension of the Chief Justice’s tenure, Tarar clarified that Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa had expressed no interest in extending his term. “During the three meetings that I had with the top judge, he reiterated his disinterest in the extension of his tenure, saying that any amendments would come into effect after his retirement,” Tarar stated.

Before the Senate session, Tarar addressed a press conference at Parliament House, accompanied by Information Minister Attaullah Tarar. He elaborated on the bill’s contents, noting that a constitutional bench would be formed by a judicial commission led by the Chief Justice of Pakistan.

“Before the 18th Amendment, judges were appointed by the President on the advice of the PM,” he explained. The proposed commission, referred to as the ‘new-face’ commission, will include the Chief Justice, four senior-most Supreme Court judges, two senators, and two MNAs—one from the opposition and one from the treasury.

“We are aiming to achieve a broader consensus with this commission,” he added. The minister further stated that the attorney general would also be part of the commission.

Tarar highlighted the need for representation of marginalised communities, stating, “Those whose fundamental rights need to be enforced, such as women and minorities, will be appointed by the National Assembly Speaker.” He also mentioned the intention to include a technocrat from outside parliament to provide input based on experience.

He further announced the introduction of a performance evaluation system for the provincial judiciary. He addressed public complaints about protracted legal proceedings, noting that cases could remain pending for up to ten years. “This judicial commission needs to enforce a nationwide standard, so the performance of high court judges will be evaluated,” he said.

“We need to appreciate the judges who perform well, but in the past, we have received complaints that after confirmation, their work is inadequate,” he continued, adding, “We need to ensure that taxpayers’ money is being well spent, and when the judiciary is receiving such perks, we expect results.” Cases deemed inefficient will be referred to the Supreme Judicial Council for further review, he maintained.

Click to expand...
How did theh get 2/3rd majority.. Does anyone know the breakdown of the numbers?
 
Savak said:
It appears the end of IK is nigh, only a matter of time before Munir instructs his execution, assassination.
Click to expand...
They would be stupid to take him out. He is a great bargaining chip aagainst PTI and power card against government. They can play him against everyone based on the situation.
 

National Assembly passes 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill in wee hours of morning​


After the Senate passed the 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill 2024 with a two-thirds majority on Sunday evening, the National Assembly also passed the heavily contested bill with a two-thirds majority. The government needed to secure 224 votes to go over the line and it managed to secure 225 votes as some opposition members staged a walk out.

NA Speaker Ayaz Sadiq began the voting process after giving the floor to parliamentary leaders of various political parties. The bill was presented in the National Assembly by Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar during a session that commenced late Sunday night and extended into the early hours of Monday morning.

The bill has been in development for some time, with discussions facilitated by a special parliamentary committee formed last month. The committee included representatives from all political parties, including the PTI, and reviewed various proposals to finalise the bill's content.

After a brief recess, Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari addressed the assembly, delivering a speech lasting over 50 minutes. He expressed his appreciation for Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F) Chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman, recognizing his pivotal role in facilitating the bill's passage.

“Maulana Fazlur Rehman did the most to ensure the success of this bill. His contribution has been historic, and I can proudly say he played the most significant part in it,” Bilawal stated. He stated that the amendments had been passed with 100 per cent political consensus.

Bilawal extended his gratitude to several political parties, including the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P), Independent Parliamentary Group (IPP), JUI-F, Awami National Party (ANP), and others for their cooperation.

Notably, he also acknowledged the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), saying, “I also thank the PTI for playing a part in this historic achievement. This is a political success, and I wish you wouldn’t have portrayed your own victory as a loss.”

However, PTI’s Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly, Omar Ayub Khan, took the opportunity to criticise the amendments, arguing that they failed to reflect the true will of the Pakistani people.

He directed a pointed remark at Law Minister Tarar and Bilawal, suggesting that those who had “gone missing” should also have been acknowledged during the expressions of thanks.

Ayub recounted allegations of mistreatment faced by PTI lawmakers, stating, “These were all tactics to pressure us. The mistreatment of Imran Khan in jail is also an example.”

The PTI alleged that seven of its lawmakers had been “abducted” and accused the government of attempting to enact the amendment under duress. Questioning the urgency of the amendment’s passage, Ayub asked, “What would have happened had it been passed on October 31?.”

He further expressed concern that the amendments aimed to undermine judicial independence, asserting, “We do not think this government is capable of bringing constitutional amendments. Therefore, we have instructed PTI members not to become part of this process.”

In response to the discussions, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif defended the amendment, stating that its passage through the Senate was essential to restore the respect and dignity of the parliament and the House. “There must be consistency in our political behaviour; otherwise, we will not gain the respect and dignity we seek,” he concluded.

Asif further emphasised that the constitutional amendments were not a novel initiative by the government but rather an extension of the Charter of Democracy, which had been unanimously endorsed by all political leaders, including Imran Khan.

The Charter of Democracy was signed on May 14, 2006, in London by major political parties as a response to the military rule of General Pervez Musharraf. Its purpose was to foster democratic principles and to safeguard against the misuse of power by unelected bodies, including the military and judiciary.

Furthermore, JUI-F chief praised all political parties, including the PTI, for their roles in facilitating the successful passage of the bill.

Rehman remarked, “The discussions we are having and the amendments we are considering stem from concerns regarding Supreme Court judges seeking extended terms. Upon learning of these developments, I raised the issue in the assembly and advocated for a constitutional amendment to prevent any conflict between the legislature and judiciary.”

He noted his commitment to the Charter of Democracy, which symbolises a collective agreement. “It called for the establishment of a constitutional court, and we have upheld our commitment to it, even as divisive resolutions have emerged in various forums.”

Rehman stated that the Constitution would remain a steadfast pillar, regardless of the ever-changing political environment. “These amendments reflect the commitments made between the nation and the provinces,” he stated.

He highlighted the sacredness of the Constitution, asserting that “the more revered it is, the more difficult it becomes to amend.” This, he explained, underscores the need to maintain constitutional integrity amidst political fluctuations.

Rehman further revealed that while the parties initially agreed on 65 clauses, extensive discussions led to the finalization of 22 clauses.

Addressing the PTI's concerns and Imran Khan’s imprisonment, he remarked, “The leader of the PTI is currently in jail under dire circumstances; such news is unacceptable.” He condemned the harsh treatment of any political leader, adding, “Had I anticipated the fate that awaited Imran Khan, I would have spoken out against it at the time.”

He also acknowledged attempts to create division within the opposition, asserting, “I have worked tirelessly to ensure unity among opposition parties and between the government and the opposition.”

Rehman reflected on the challenges faced, noting, “Despite numerous discussions with stakeholders, we could not agree on the formation of the courts. This is a democracy, not a dictatorship. We have accomplished the extraordinary despite significant difficulties.”

Moreover, Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) leader Dr Farooq Sattar expressed that Pakistan's political, judicial, and democratic journeys have not always been characterised by noble intentions. “We all have erred, leading to political crises and conflicts between institutions,” he stated.

“While some of the core principles within the 26th Constitutional Amendment may make the MQM, its members, and its voters vulnerable, we choose to prioritise the greater good of the country,” Sattar continued. He asserted that such dedication enables the government to navigate the populace through confusion and uncertainty.

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan took the floor next, voicing strong opposition to the recent constitutional amendments in alignment with his party's stance.

“They are not seeking a constitutional court; rather, they want a court that lacks independence,” he asserted. “This marks a dark day for the judiciary and the legal system.”

Khan explained that while the PTI had participated in the committee addressing parliamentary issues alongside the Maulana, he said, “I want to state clearly that we have not consented to a single word of this document, as we deem it illegitimate.”

tribune.com.pk

National Assembly passes 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill in wee hours of morning | The Express Tribune

Opposition parties Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Sunni Ittehad Council staged a walk out as the voting process began
tribune.com.pk tribune.com.pk
 

Chief Justice of Pakistan appointment process as per 26th Constitutional Amendment​


The 26th Constitutional Amendment has introduced major reforms, reshaping the judiciary in Pakistan. The amendment outlines significant changes, including the appointment procedure and tenure of the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP).

The newly passed 27-point amendment includes 22 provisions from the government and 5 proposed by the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI). Here are the key details:

Chief Justice Appointment

The Chief Justice of Pakistan will now be appointed by a 12-member parliamentary committee of 8 members from the National Assembly and 4 from the Senate.

The committee will select one of the three most senior judges of the Supreme Court to be the Chief Justice. The selection process requires a two-thirds majority vote, ensuring broad consensus.

If the appointed judge reaches the age of 65 before completing the fixed three-year term, they will retire at that point. The change was made through an amendment to Article 179, which previously only outlined the retirement age.

Judicial Reforms

The creation of constitutional benches in the Supreme Court has been enshrined through the introduction of Article 191A. These benches, composed of senior judges, will exclusively hear constitutional matters, appeals, and suo motu cases. The judicial commission will determine the number of judges to form the bench, and each province will have equal representation as much as possible.

The amendment also introduces a similar system of constitutional benches in High Courts, though the creation of these benches will depend on provincial legislation. Moreover, High Courts will no longer have the authority to take suo motu notices.

Judicial Commission and Other Changes

The Judicial Commission remains intact, with four members of parliament and a representative from civil society added to the structure. A new provision allows the Speaker of the National Assembly to nominate a woman or non-Muslim member to the commission for a two-year term.

Additionally, the power of the judiciary to issue any order for complete justice under Article 187 has been limited. The judiciary can now only issue orders within the constitutional framework.

The ruling rainbow coalition termed the amendment as a significant shift in how the judiciary operates, with increased parliamentary oversight.

Chief Justice of Pakistan appointment process as per 26th Constitutional Amendment

A 12-member parliamentary committee of 8 NA and 4 Senate members will now appoint new CJP
www.samaa.tv www.samaa.tv
 

PTI stance leaves many scratching their heads​

The PTI has chided the government for its “ulterior motives” behind the 26th Constitutional Amendment and announced protests against the legislation.

A statement, issued by a party spokesperson after the Senate passed the amendments with four votes against the bill cast by PTI and its allies, was in stark contrast to the remarks made earlier on Sunday by the PTI chairman, who said his party had “no objections” to the final draft but would not vote for it in parliament.

Gohar Ali Khan spoke to the media in the afternoon after what was probably the last of his numerous visits to the residence of JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman for deliberations on the constitutional amendments.

“Our leader Imran Khan will always have the final say on party decisions, so we act on his instructions and recommendations,” the PTI chairman said, adding Mr Khan had instructed the party to have more consultations before voting “since this legislation is so serious”.

“Given that we have no time for further consultations, as well as all the delays, how the bill was processed and how our MNAs and senators were harassed and intimidated, the PTI cannot vote for this bill,” Mr Gohar declared.

When the Senate session began, some PTI senators were present in the house.

PTI’s parliamentary leader in Senate, Barrister Ali Zafar, said only four to five members are present as the rest were afraid that “they’d be coerced to vote in favour of the amendment”. He expressed apprehension that some PTI members might be “brought” to the house to vote in favour of the amendment.

However, that didn’t happen, as only four members on the opposition benches first voted against the motion to table the bill and then against the amendments, which were passed after getting the required two-thirds vote.

PTI lawmakers ‘untraceable’

Earlier, in a video message, former National Assembly speaker Asad Qaiser said it was “unfortunate” that the PTI founding chairman was imprisoned and not allowed to meet anyone.

He alleged that MNAs and their families were being threatened when the house of one PTI member was bulldozed. PTI leaders also claimed on Sunday that some of their lawmakers were untraceable.

PTI central leader Omar Ayub Khan said they were unable to contact seven lawmakers, while Mr Gohar put the number at two. Both didn’t name any of the lawmakers.

However, sources confirmed that as many as 11 members of both houses were missing since Sunday morning.

Of them, nine were National Assembly members and two senators. According to sources, the “missing” legislators included MNAs Zain Qureshi, Zahoor Hussain Qureshi, Muhammad Aslam Ghumman, Usman Ali, Riaz Fatyana, Muhammad Miqdad Ali Khan, Aurangzeb Khan Khichi, Mubarak Zeb and Muhammad Ilyas Choudhary. The two senators were Faisal Saleem and Zarqa Suharwardy.

Reaction to amendment

In a statement, the PTI spokesperson claimed the 26th Constitutional Amendment was passed by a house that was “not a representative of people”.

The statement said it was a “Black Day” and announced plans to start a movement against the amendment.

“The goal of the amendment is nothing but to protect those who have been brought into the government through forgery.”

The doors of politics have been closed on PTI, Imran Khan and 240 million people of Pakistan. The independence of the judiciary has been curtailed, and the court has been made a tool that will act on the government’s directions,“ the PTI spokesperson added.

The aim of this legislation is to “stop the senior-most judge of the Supreme Court from becoming chief justice,” the statement said while referring to Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, who, before the amendment, was set to become the top judge after the incumbent’s retirement later this month. “It is unfortunate that the government ran from pillar to post to pass the amendment, but it has done nothing for the people of Pakistan and will not lessen their woes.”

The judiciary, which the PTI spokesperson called the only frontier of resistance “has been removed from the way of powers that be”.

The legislation to nominate one of the top three SC judges as the chief justice will make the judges “a tool of the government”.

www.dawn.com

PTI stance leaves many scratching their heads

Party spokesperson says 26th Amendment's goal is to protect those brought into the govt through forgery.
www.dawn.com
 

President to sign constitutional package into law today​


President Asif Ali Zardari is expected to give his assent and sign the 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill into law upon the advice of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Monday (today).

Aiwan-e-Sadr Secretariat has confirmed that the ceremony originally slated to take place at 6am — another announcement was made for 8am as well — will now be held at some other time today, the time for which will be announced later.

The development comes after the ruling coalition succeeded in pushing the highly contentious judicial reforms through the Parliament via a two-thirds majority with 225 and 65 votes in the lower and upper house, respectively.

Following the late-night marathon session in the Parliament, PM Shehbaz sent an advice to President Zardari in the wee hours of Monday to give his assent and sign the legislation into law.

The treasury benches, comprising 211 seats, required 224 votes in the NA. However, their numbers rose to 219 following the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl's (JUI-F) support.

The amendments were passed after the PTI-backed independent lawmakers including Zahoor Qureshi, Aurangzeb Khichi, Usman Ali, and Mubarak Zeb voted in favour of the motion along with the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid's (PML-Q) Chaudhry Ilyas.

Overview of legislation​

  • Chief Justice of Pakistan's (CJP) tenure fixed at three years.
  • Constitutional benches to be established at the SC and high courts.
  • Senior-most judge of each bench to serve as presiding officer.
  • Parliamentary committee to nominate new CJP from panel of three most senior judges.
  • Committee to propose name to PM, who will then forward it to president for final approval.
  • JCP, led by CJP and three others, responsible for appointment of SC judges.
  • JCP to monitor judges’ performance, report any concerns to Supreme Judicial Council.
  • Complete eradication of Riba (interest) from country by January 1, 2028.
www.thenews.com.pk

President Asif Zardari signs constitutional amendments into law

ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari on Monday gave his assent to the 26th Constitutional Amendment Bill which has now come into force as a law following the head of state's signature.A gazette...
www.thenews.com.pk www.thenews.com.pk
 
FearlessRoar said:

PTI stance leaves many scratching their heads​

The PTI has chided the government for its “ulterior motives” behind the 26th Constitutional Amendment and announced protests against the legislation.

A statement, issued by a party spokesperson after the Senate passed the amendments with four votes against the bill cast by PTI and its allies, was in stark contrast to the remarks made earlier on Sunday by the PTI chairman, who said his party had “no objections” to the final draft but would not vote for it in parliament.

Gohar Ali Khan spoke to the media in the afternoon after what was probably the last of his numerous visits to the residence of JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman for deliberations on the constitutional amendments.

“Our leader Imran Khan will always have the final say on party decisions, so we act on his instructions and recommendations,” the PTI chairman said, adding Mr Khan had instructed the party to have more consultations before voting “since this legislation is so serious”.

“Given that we have no time for further consultations, as well as all the delays, how the bill was processed and how our MNAs and senators were harassed and intimidated, the PTI cannot vote for this bill,” Mr Gohar declared.

When the Senate session began, some PTI senators were present in the house.

PTI’s parliamentary leader in Senate, Barrister Ali Zafar, said only four to five members are present as the rest were afraid that “they’d be coerced to vote in favour of the amendment”. He expressed apprehension that some PTI members might be “brought” to the house to vote in favour of the amendment.

However, that didn’t happen, as only four members on the opposition benches first voted against the motion to table the bill and then against the amendments, which were passed after getting the required two-thirds vote.

PTI lawmakers ‘untraceable’

Earlier, in a video message, former National Assembly speaker Asad Qaiser said it was “unfortunate” that the PTI founding chairman was imprisoned and not allowed to meet anyone.

He alleged that MNAs and their families were being threatened when the house of one PTI member was bulldozed. PTI leaders also claimed on Sunday that some of their lawmakers were untraceable.

PTI central leader Omar Ayub Khan said they were unable to contact seven lawmakers, while Mr Gohar put the number at two. Both didn’t name any of the lawmakers.

However, sources confirmed that as many as 11 members of both houses were missing since Sunday morning.

Of them, nine were National Assembly members and two senators. According to sources, the “missing” legislators included MNAs Zain Qureshi, Zahoor Hussain Qureshi, Muhammad Aslam Ghumman, Usman Ali, Riaz Fatyana, Muhammad Miqdad Ali Khan, Aurangzeb Khan Khichi, Mubarak Zeb and Muhammad Ilyas Choudhary. The two senators were Faisal Saleem and Zarqa Suharwardy.

Reaction to amendment

In a statement, the PTI spokesperson claimed the 26th Constitutional Amendment was passed by a house that was “not a representative of people”.

The statement said it was a “Black Day” and announced plans to start a movement against the amendment.

“The goal of the amendment is nothing but to protect those who have been brought into the government through forgery.”

The doors of politics have been closed on PTI, Imran Khan and 240 million people of Pakistan. The independence of the judiciary has been curtailed, and the court has been made a tool that will act on the government’s directions,“ the PTI spokesperson added.

The aim of this legislation is to “stop the senior-most judge of the Supreme Court from becoming chief justice,” the statement said while referring to Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, who, before the amendment, was set to become the top judge after the incumbent’s retirement later this month. “It is unfortunate that the government ran from pillar to post to pass the amendment, but it has done nothing for the people of Pakistan and will not lessen their woes.”

The judiciary, which the PTI spokesperson called the only frontier of resistance “has been removed from the way of powers that be”.

The legislation to nominate one of the top three SC judges as the chief justice will make the judges “a tool of the government”.

www.dawn.com

PTI stance leaves many scratching their heads

Party spokesperson says 26th Amendment's goal is to protect those brought into the govt through forgery.
www.dawn.com
Click to expand...
How can a constitutional amendment passed by a mafia with less 50 seats leave any izzat and ghairatmand person scratch their heads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Bald Eagle
  • Poll
"What is happening in Bangladesh can happen in India": Former Indian External Affair Minister
2
Replies
112
Views
2K
Champ_Pal
C
Stewie
Louisiana Ten Commandments Bill
Replies
40
Views
502
The Bald Eagle
The Bald Eagle
The Bald Eagle
Banana republic or London plan? Supreme Court ruling on reserved seats cannot be implemented under new law: NA speaker Ayaz Sadiq
Replies
40
Views
1K
Bewal Express
B
FearlessRoar
“I visit you and you stab me in the back by assuring cooperation and then you begin protests in D-Chowk?”: Nawaz Sharif on PTI's ungrateful attitude
Replies
13
Views
755
FearlessRoar
FearlessRoar
The Bald Eagle
"Imran Khan was ousted on Gen Bajwa's directives,I was personally against the no-confidence move," JUI-F chief Fazal ur Rehman
2
Replies
104
Views
3K
Cricket Warrior
C
Back
Top