Bublu Bhuyan
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2006
- Runs
- 7,604
How about Raina ?Garuda said:He really impressed on his debut. didn't he?
Couple of others who should be in the run as well are Badrinath and Rohit Sharma.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about Raina ?Garuda said:He really impressed on his debut. didn't he?
Couple of others who should be in the run as well are Badrinath and Rohit Sharma.
The more the betterBublu Bhuyan said:How about Raina ?
Bublu Bhuyan said:How about Raina ?
USaqaf said:Why do i get the feeling the some PPers (non Indians) are rooting for an Indian win?
Tupac said:Didn't quite work out the way you wanted it did you? 3-0 to NZ?
I am afraid the scenarios you suggested are unfair to certain extent. Remember, Dravid has been woefully out of form ever since the West Indies tour which India won 1-0. After that, I havent seen a single innings by him which was convincing like his usual self until the first test against NZ.Garuda said:I agree with you that we still haven't got a replacement for Dravid (not talking about the Dravid of last 1-2 years). Dravid of before 2007 was what we need as our no 3.
But sometimes I feel current Dravid will always help us saving a match than winning a match. I will keep some match scenarios
First Innigs this test: He played almost 200 balls to score 30 odd runs and get out. If tail hadn't scored then there was no value of that long innings as it was not long enough to handle the innings at one end.
Chennai test against SA where Veeru scored 300 : If dravid hadn't taken ages to complete his 100 we could have had a chance to fancy a win. The declaration was too late to even think of getting SA all out. It was a flat pitch but again thats where you take chances if you give yourself more time.
Against England when India chased 387 in last innings within little over 3 sessions. Can we imagine Dravid playing his innings and we getting to the target. Yes he definitely can save matches for us any day.
Again, I am a good supporter of Dravid but I also feel test cricket is also about runs and not just time. If you play for time then you are making sure you are not loosing but if you play for run then you are playing for winning.
So depending on match situation you need to keep the scoring rate. Dravid was perfect in last test when he played for time and so did Gambhir. We shouldn't be playing that in this match. Its bad if we score 150 runs in more than two sessions tomorrow and don't loose wickets.
USaqaf said:Well 20million$ for a 2-0 win is a drop in BCCIs bucket.
Heres another information - BCCI paid Misbah half that amount to scoop it in the T20 finalUSaqaf said:Well 20million$ for a 2-0 win is a drop in BCCIs bucket.
invincible said:we showed fighting spirit. And more often than not, its players like Dravid who stand up in such situations.
Tupac said:Gimme a break. Can't handle India's success so you think we paid for these victories? That's insulting NZ too.
If we win against you will you say the PAK board sold out too?
USaqaf said:What success do you speak of?
Youre still an average team , the problem is your media and mindset is ready to make mountains of molehills of success.
Plus its no secret that BCCI has pulled something off in NZ, first by threatening who commentates to what sort of pitches are prepared.
NZ cricket board is as bankrupt as PCB maybe worse, they desperately need money thats why they didnt take any ICL players who would have certainly strengthened the NZ team. So theyve decided who plays for NZ and who doesnt.Its also no secret that cricket is fading in NZ and this is all the more sad as NZ cricket is held at ransom and their players are being sacrificed.
So dont take the high road as if you dont think this is happening.
invincible said:Heres another information - BCCI paid Misbah half that amount to scoop it in the T20 finalCannot believe he would sell his country like that! But alas, what can you do!
USaqaf said:NZ cricket board is as bankrupt as PCB maybe worse
Saj said:Would it be unfair to say that the current New Zealand top order is one of the worst ever seen in test cricket?
Saj said:Would it be unfair to say that the current New Zealand top order is one of the worst ever seen in test cricket?
IronMan2009 said:Yea. They are distinctly mediocre. They were thrown at the deep end. They don't have the temperament or technique for big stage.
jusarrived said:just wait and watch for couple of years , what they lack is temperament , not technique !
IronMan2009 said:Mcintosh is an insult to be an opening batsman I wonder how he made a century with this half cock movement. Same way Guptill has some serious weakness off the backfoot. Top 3 are really poor. At the moment walking wickets at Test level. Yea.. they might become good players in future. So far no indication of that. Their middle order is a real good one though.
USaqaf said:What success do you speak of?
Youre still an average team , the problem is your media and mindset is ready to make mountains of molehills of success.
Plus its no secret that BCCI has pulled something off in NZ, first by threatening who commentates to what sort of pitches are prepared.
NZ cricket board is as bankrupt as PCB maybe worse, they desperately need money thats why they didnt take any ICL players who would have certainly strengthened the NZ team. So theyve decided who plays for NZ and who doesnt.Its also no secret that cricket is fading in NZ and this is all the more sad as NZ cricket is held at ransom and their players are being sacrificed.
So dont take the high road as if you dont think this is happening.
USaqaf said:Well 20million$ for a 2-0 win is a drop in BCCIs bucket.
tdigi said:I wonder if Jeetan Patel would have been a better option for Vettori in this test. The breeze and drift is helping the slower bowlers.
checkers.llvllaster said:I don't think replacing Vettori would have been a good idea. NZ without Vettori look even more hopeless. He can be a useful batsman and at the same time, you never know before a test match how much Vettori's spin could come handy.
tdigi said:No not replacing Vettori but having 3 seamers and 2 spinners.
and promote himself and McCullum up the batting order.
checkers.llvllaster said:Gambhir is really opening up now. If he continues for another 20 to 30 overs, he will be adding runs very quickly and by the end of today, India would have batted NZ out of the game...
checkers.llvllaster said:While Dravid is trying his best to slow the RR![]()
checkers.llvllaster said:While Dravid is trying his best to slow the RR![]()
jusarrived said:if you check his SR has gone up to 40 from 14 in teh first half hour ...hes scoring close to 100sr now & still he is slowing rr ?
Zaz said:Every positive action has a equally negative reaction![]()
checkers.llvllaster said:Mere bhai, that was just a joke yaar! But in all reality, if you check his SR for the past 3 or 4 overs, it's going back down...
jusarrived said:thats test cricket , there is never the need to hit every ball for a boundary !
IronMan2009 said:Dravid is never going to play like Sehwag. He has played few times like that in Tests. Once in Sydney Test he made 91 in 114 balls. Ganguly declared the innings.
http://content.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/64062.htm
checkers.llvllaster said:I agree with you, but India are in a very firm position now, and is it wise to be playing at SR of 40 in such a position?
jusarrived said:our rr is up to 3.7 & we are still left with 3 days of test match left ...is there a need to score in T20 mode ? Dravid always plays the anchors role , which allows the other batsmen to play his shots ..its a team game yaar ,we have scored 120 runs in the first session , why complain ?
checkers.llvllaster said:Aree yaar, aap to gussa ho gaye...I wasn't complaining, like I said above that I was just joking. The RR is up to 3.7 because of the way Gambhir played, not Dravid.
jusarrived said:nah , just explaining ..you still dont understand ...the fact is even if he scores at 100sr , people will always complain , nuthing new !
Ganguly declared during the 2nd innings of that Sydney Test after Dravid was hit on the side of the helmet. He was bleeding as well.IronMan2009 said:Dravid is never going to play like Sehwag. He has played few times like that in Tests. Once in Sydney Test he made 91 in 114 balls. Ganguly declared the innings. His primary role is to prevent top order collapse and see off new ball at the fall of first wicket. He is rock solid in this series.
http://content.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/64062.html
OZGOD said:I will run around Boston naked!
Promote cricket in UStdigi said:ask your friend to capture it on camera and post it on youtube![]()
I agree with you completely. Ryder and Flynn especially are going to be very good players in the test format. They are quite composed when they want to be and can accelerate at will. Taylor on the other hand will remain an enigma, maybe not as consistent as others but will surely turn up every now and then and make big scores. Add to these four - Vettori and McCullum and you have a decent batting line up.jusarrived said:nope , they are inexperienced ....mark my words , this will be a worldclass batting linup in 2-3 years time ....Ryder , Taylor , Flynn and Guptil , thats some serious talent imo....these guys are better than most youngsetrs i have seen coming up from other countries ..we are actually fortunate that we are playing them at this early stage of their careers !
jusarrived said:nope , they are inexperienced ....mark my words , this will be a worldclass batting linup in 2-3 years time ....Ryder , Taylor , Flynn and Guptil , thats some serious talent imo....these guys are better than most youngsetrs i have seen coming up from other countries ..we are actually fortunate that we are playing them at this early stage of their careers !