New Zealand v Pakistan | 3rd ODI | Auckland | Jan 31, 2016 | New Zealand Innings

[hur rizvi]

Nz should win it.

Unfair for Pakistan though.

Nothing unfair

 

[Dr_Bassim]

I don't know why people are claiming NZ got lucky.

They were 50-50 before, they are 50-50 now.

Clearly, some people were predicting a 200 percent Pak win to be considering NZ lucky now.

 

[m.shah]

I don't really think NZ got lucky.


It's still 50-50.

A couple of early wickets, and NZ might lose it all.

That was still possible when 81 were needed

 

[Itachi]

unfair, kuch bhi? unfair kyun?

I always feel rain rules are unfair and benefits the second batting team.

Target became short yet wickets remained same.

 

[hur rizvi]

I don't really think NZ got lucky.

It's still 50-50.

A couple of early wickets, and NZ might lose it all.

Run a ball in last 7 overs should favour batting side

 

[Dr_Bassim]

Lucky because equation got easier for nz.

With tail enders coming, 53 is much better than 81

They aren't tailenders.

 

[timeflies]

Noo I would much prefer the more overs and more runs

 

[Pakistani Pace]

[MENTION=138608]Pakistani Pace[/MENTION]

Thanks!

 

[#GreenRoars]

NZ got lucky

 

[Abdul]

Why do we persist? Why do we continue watching? Are we all an insane bunch?

 

[Adijazz1706]

Easier for NZ now than it was before. Pakistan's last 15 overs were disastrous

 

[hur rizvi]

Perfect scenario for Ronchi to go boom

 

[Madplayer]

Noo I would much prefer the more overs and more runs

Same here.

 

[Itachi]

I don't know why people are claiming NZ got lucky.

They were 50-50 before, they are 50-50 now.

Clearly, some people were predicting a 200 percent Pak win to be considering NZ lucky now.

100 balls 100 runs 3 wickets remaining.

10 balls 10 runs 3 wickets remaining.

Which one you will choose if batting second and given a choice 3

 

[marlonbrowndo]

This and next over very important

 

[Ankit007]

NZ needs 53 off 45 now. Dont think its a helpful equation for pak now

 

[Dr_Bassim]

Match is still 50-50.

Just have patience and trust.

 

[Madplayer]

Why do we persist? Why do we continue watching? Are we all an insane bunch?

Didnt mr. Anderson say the same to Neo in matrix?

 

[hur rizvi]

need to stop easy singles

 

[marlonbrowndo]

Dont toss it up...

 

[Dr_Bassim]

100 balls 100 runs 3 wickets remaining.

10 balls 10 runs 3 wickets remaining.

Which one you will choose if batting second and given a choice 3

It wasn't 100 runs and it's not 10 either.

 

[Pakistani Pace]

Pakistan need wickets here

 

[Kakar]

Field is too spread for my liking.

 

[Corridor of Uncertainty]

81 runs are that many more runs to play with - so in that case, rain will help NZ more than Pakistan.

Having said that, both teams signed on the rules sheet before entering the series and they are the same for both.

So try to win the damn game.

End of discussion.

 

[marlonbrowndo]

Azhar must keep best fielders facing sun on boundary. Give the next one to Amir...

 

[Madplayer]

Need two wickets here and one of corey

 

[hur rizvi]

Big dillema for Azhar who to bowl?

May be Irfan

 

[Itachi]

It wasn't 100 runs and it's not 10 either.

I agree it isn't that drastic but it isn't that close that you are making it to be in my opinion.

 

[The intelligent Supporter]

Naram sa to hai.

Never gets Old.

 

[Dr_Bassim]

53 and 81 runs is barely a difference of 28 runs.

 

[hur rizvi]

wahab is risky here

 

[Madplayer]

Big dillema for Azhar who to bowl?

May be Irfan

Wahab. Azhar attacking with a slip.

 

[m.shah]

52 from 42

 

[marlonbrowndo]

Beauty

 

[Dr_Bassim]

WASP is 48 percent. That's what it means.

It's 50-50.

 

[Pakistani Pace]

53 and 81 runs is barely a difference of 28 runs.

Exactly we can do this!

 

[Itachi]

53 and 81 runs is barely a difference of 28 runs.

Not when new basman are coming in with pressure building up. Not to mention losing one over of amir in the process.

 

[marlonbrowndo]

Yorker needed to corey.... Just dont bowl too full or its a six.

 

[hur rizvi]

Lets hope ronchi doesnt find his touch

 

[#GreenRoars]

Need Wahab special

 

[Madplayer]

Pak is better off with ronchi out there. Corey should go

 

[Pakistani Pace]

Whos bowling?

 

[m.shah]

Dot ball

 

[Madplayer]

Oh God irfan loosening up. I hope he doesnt get thrashed.

 

[carrom_ball]

1 good over for pak might win them the game, I say it is advantage pak although 1 bad over might lose them the game too, it is 50-50 I guess, amir's over is the key

 

[The intelligent Supporter]

WASP is 48 percent. That's what it means.

It's 50-50.

WASP is a Joke Dr Saab

 

[marlonbrowndo]

Ronchi back in strike so good stuff. Excellent over

 

[Dr_Bassim]

If they can get 50 off 36 balls, they would have got 81 off 90 balls.

If they can't get 50 off 36 balls, it's highly unlikely they would have got 81 off 90 balls.

 

[hur rizvi]

Irfan will bowl from the looks of it

 

[marlonbrowndo]

Can Amir bowl?

 

[Itachi]

Corey is there.... So RR isn't an issue.

 

[Madplayer]

1 good over for pak might win them the game, I say it is advantage pak although 1 bad over might lose them the game too, it is 50-50 I guess, amir's over is the key

Too much concentration on the best bowler and other bowlers run away with the show.

 

[usam wani]

Yes you are right bro. But again I would say that there was just one game which we lost comprehensively. 2 were close games we lost. So still i would consider India better then SA.

india is the best batting side i would say... much better than aussises

 

[m.shah]

Common finish the over well

 

[Dr_Bassim]

WASP is a Joke Dr Saab

WASP is an idea.

It isn't all and be it.

It doesn't account for innings pressure and situations, but it does give it's an idea what the situation is without pressure and type of batsmen coming in.

 

[MMHS]

WASP is showing 42% & it's often quite accurate.

 

[Pakistani Pace]

Inshallah Pak will win

 

[marlonbrowndo]

Please no half volley

 

[Abdullah719]

If they can get 50 off 36 balls, they would have got 81 off 90 balls.

If they can't get 50 off 36 balls, it's highly unlikely they would have got 81 off 90 balls.

Not as simple as that, but rules are rules and the game must go on. Let's win dis.

 

[razabbas]

123 kp/h

 

[marlonbrowndo]

No width!

 

[Adijazz1706]

PTV ads are the worst, almost missed the 1st ball.

 

[Abdullah719]

Can Amir bowl?

One over.

 

[hur rizvi]

too much width from Irfan

 

[Itachi]

If they can get 50 off 36 balls, they would have got 81 off 90 balls.

If they can't get 50 off 36 balls, it's highly unlikely they would have got 81 off 90 balls.

Easier to chase smaller targets.

299 and 301 isn't that much but there's a psychological difference.

Similarly if targets get reduce, people feel more positive.

 

[razabbas]

there you go dont know what happened to irfan he have became such a useless bowler

 

[Madplayer]

india is the best batting side i would say... much better than aussises

Aussies are the best ODI batting line up on flat tracks. They are all the same in helpful conditions.

 

[Abdullah719]

Irfan.

 

[Adijazz1706]

Irfaaaan!

 

[Shafi]

Irfan is such a rubbish!!!!

 

[usam wani]

irfan aj haraney k liye akela hi kaafi hai...

 

[Ankit007]

Amir has just one over left now. Why is Malik not bowling. they will try to whack him and lose their wicket.

 

[hur rizvi]

need wicket

 

[m.shah]

I though Amir had two overs left

 

[ChachaCricket]

Irfan's well and truly finished now.

 

[Abdul]

Not sure why Irfan is giving too much width.

 

[The intelligent Supporter]

WASP is an idea.

It isn't all and be it.

It doesn't account for innings pressure and situations, but it does give it's an idea what the situation is without pressure and type of batsmen coming in.

Cricket is played in the Mind. So WASP is useless

 

[hur rizvi]

Amir has just one over left now. Why is Malik not bowling. they will try to whack him and lose their wicket.

too risky to bowl a spinner here

 

[Adijazz1706]

Amir needs to bowl the next over from this end, especially if Corey is stll there.

 

[Watsupdoc]

Irfan is bowling very predictively...