siccric
First Class Star
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Runs
- 3,678
insaaniyat said:NopeWish we had someone like Imran Khan. Imran Khan was a well educated diplomat. The whole world of cricket respected him.
What BS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
insaaniyat said:NopeWish we had someone like Imran Khan. Imran Khan was a well educated diplomat. The whole world of cricket respected him.
siccric said:What BSImran Khan was a bigger dictator than YK will ever be. Yes, he was a fantastic captain and a well respected man, but no one, including himself, would deny that he was a dictator (a successful one too). Btw, you'd be surprised how much respect people have for YK in other countries. In fact, I'd say he's the only senior player in our team with support from almost the entire cricketing fraternity
really?PerfectionPersonified said:mano na mano yeh sab kuch America nein kerwaya hay ...lol
insaaniyat said:really?how?
insaaniyat said:Holy Quran should never be used for such things. However uniting against a dictator is not an immoral act.
He has done worse slapped fans who get to friendly with him, but we do not have 101 tv station covering it so it is not repeated a couple of million times on TVinsaaniyat said:Have you ever seen Imran Khan drag a fan from the field and beat him up? Did Imran Khan ever quit in the eleventh hour and left the team stranded? Did players revolt against Imran Khan? Even if they did, Imran Khan didn't resort to resigning. Imran Khan is just pure class. He was always good for Pakistan in his playing days and now too. Comparing YK to Imran Khan is an insult to Imran Khan
insaaniyat said:Have you ever seen Imran Khan drag a fan from the field and beat him up? Did Imran Khan ever quit in the eleventh hour and left the team stranded? Did players revolt against Imran Khan? Even if they did, Imran Khan didn't resort to resigning. Imran Khan is just pure class. He was always good for Pakistan in his playing days and now too. Comparing YK to Imran Khan is an insult to Imran Khan
iafzal said:He has done worse slapped fans who get to friendly with him, but we do not have 101 tv station covering it so it is not repeated a couple of million times on TV
siccric said:What BSImran Khan was a bigger dictator than YK will ever be. Yes, he was a fantastic captain and a well respected man, but no one, including himself, would deny that he was a dictator (a successful one too). Btw, you'd be surprised how much respect people have for YK in other countries. In fact, I'd say he's the only senior player in our team with support from almost the entire cricketing fraternity
siccric said:A dictator suppressing revolts? That doesn't sound too great to me. The honourable thing to do when your entire team is taking oaths against you, is to resign. At least that's how I see it. I don't think quitters should be ashamed under these circumstances. Anyway, they both were dealing with different kinds of players in their time, and the media wasn't quite the same back then either. Imran Khan isn't an angel by any means, but we shouldn't ruin this thread with this discussion
pakroyals said:Difference was due to Imran's stature and influence on Pakistan cricket and masses, no one had the guts to revolt against him.
insaaniyat said:NopeWish we had someone like Imran Khan. Imran Khan was a well educated diplomat. The whole world of cricket respected him.
some people will say anything to make a point.insaftak said:Imran Khan was a diplomat? You have no idea who imran khan is/was. for more listen to this interview from two days ago.
http://pkaffairs.com/Play_Show_Dunya_Meray_Aagay_–_23rd_June_2010_9332
Saj said:can someone post the article in English - thanks
Karachi: 10 months ago, during the ICC Champions Trophy, the senior players in the Pakistan cricket team took an oath on the Holy Quran to remove captain Younus Khan. Shockingly, they used the Quran YK had given to someone to take that oath. Jang has new information about this incident.
One senior player said that YK's nature on the ground (mizaaj - not sure about the exact translation) is what turned players against him. When the seven players met in a hotel room in Johannesburg, one senior player said that having a Quran to take an oath on was very important. At the time, none of the players had a copy of the Quran. The players remembered that YK had given the team fitness trainer (David Dywer) a translated copy of the Quran as a gift. They called the fitness trainer on his cellphone and got this copy, and used it against him.
Sources say this is why YK left captaincy in November. The PCB asked Mohammad Yousuf after all this whether he was involved in this oath taking against YK. He answered...
PakPassion.Net: Would you agree with those Pakistani cricketers who played under your captaincy that your leadership style was very dictatorial and that you were big on discipline?
Imran Khan: It's not a question of dictatorial, there are rules in place for everyone and those rules are there to be followed. When Symonds was disciplined recently, was that dictatorial? If you don't have discipline in the team then you would have the chaos that Pakistan cricket is going through right now. The reason Pakistan cricket has so many issues right now is because of their inconsistent discipline policy. If a player is performing well then he can get away with anything, he can break all of the rules without censure but if he's doing badly or on his way out then he gets punished. Shoaib Akhtar is a case in point. All I did when I was captain was to apply the rules equally to everyone, nobody was above the law. There's no place for a dictator in a cricket team because the other players are not employed by you, if they don't like your leadership style they can revolt against you and that has happened to some captains in the past. If you want your team to follow you then they have to respect you, you can't demand respect nor can you force anyone to respect you otherwise Shoaib Malik would be having a much easier time.
PakPassion.Net: Would you agree with those Pakistani cricketers who played under your captaincy that your leadership style was very dictatorial and that you were big on discipline?
Imran Khan: It's not a question of dictatorial, there are rules in place for everyone and those rules are there to be followed. When Symonds was disciplined recently, was that dictatorial? If you don't have discipline in the team then you would have the chaos that Pakistan cricket is going through right now. The reason Pakistan cricket has so many issues right now is because of their inconsistent discipline policy. If a player is performing well then he can get away with anything, he can break all of the rules without censure but if he's doing badly or on his way out then he gets punished. Shoaib Akhtar is a case in point. All I did when I was captain was to apply the rules equally to everyone, nobody was above the law. There's no place for a dictator in a cricket team because the other players are not employed by you, if they don't like your leadership style they can revolt against you and that has happened to some captains in the past. If you want your team to follow you then they have to respect you, you can't demand respect nor can you force anyone to respect you otherwise Shoaib Malik would be having a much easier time.
salaam to all my brothers here, i hope you people know that it is in fact not at all allowed to take an oath on the holy book, we muslims are not allowed to take an oath on no one but our creator.ALLAH S.W.T ..cant take oath on the noble prophet s.a.s or on the holy book or on our parents etc.....this is as far as i know,i hope momo or jadz or someone can help me here.ALLAH know's bestwaqar_ahmad said:Not to make this a religious discussion, but if these players used the Quran for taking the oath, I am sure they understand the importance of the Holy Book. Dont these jahils understand that it should not be used for something as immoral as this
Insanyat you must be a magician coz I read that post ten times and still can't see where Imran reveals the reasons of a revolt against YK.insaaniyat said:Good interview. Now we know the reason why players revoled againd YK.
Oh come on saeed yaar ! It was so crystal clear .. Yk wasn't the employer was he , therefore the revolt !! Samajh Aayasaeed-sohail said:Insanyat you must be a magician coz I read that post ten times and still can't see where Imran reveals the reasons of a revolt against YK.
I know mate just trying to learn trick or two from insanyat.adarsh_bang said:Oh come on saeed yaar ! It was so crystal clear .. Yk wasn't the employer was he , therefore the revolt !! Samajh Aayainsaaniyat is abt ten steps ahead of the rest of us insaans
![]()
Lie a lot? What are you on about. I have heard quite a few interviews by Imran, where he openly said that he made sure he got the players he wanted, he made all the decisions, and nothing in the team ever happened without his approval. He said batters wouldnt play false strokes coz they knew he was waiting for him in the dressing romm with some words that they were scared of hearing.Anwaar said:First of all Imran does lie a lot (when it comes to his personal image). He couldn't say yes to dictator query, could he?
During his time it was all one man show. He was the one man selector, pick or drop, no body would dare to ask a question.
In one interview Inzi said that he still remember how Imran cursed (@#$%^) him and he would not repeat the suit.
But then Inzi was also labelled as Dictator but he was nothing compared to Imran.
Anwaar said:First of all Imran does lie a lot (when it comes to his personal image). He couldn't say yes to dictator query, could he?
During his time it was all one man show. He was the one man selector, pick or drop, no body would dare to ask a question.
In one interview Inzi said that he still remember how Imran cursed (@#$%^) him and he would not repeat the suit.
But then Inzi was also labelled as Dictator but he was nothing compared to Imran.
I've yet to see Umar's name in any of the oath taking reports. Why do people lump him in with Kamran? Guilty by association?insaftak said:only oath taking brigade tells the truth (malik, akmals, yousaf, afridi) everyone else is a liar
Pakistan police has proud history of locking up immediate family of mujrim.Inswinger said:I've yet to see Umar's name in any of the oath taking reports. Why do people lump him in with Kamran? Guilty by association?
saeed-sohail said:Pakistan police has proud history of locking up immediate family of mujrim.
Yawar was later accused of helping Afridi, Malik and some other players meet Butt to whom they voiced their opposition to Younis as captain.
salaam to all my brothers here, i hope you people know that it is in fact not at all allowed to take an oath on the holy book, we muslims are not allowed to take an oath on no one but our creator.ALLAH S.W.T ..cant take oath on the noble prophet s.a.s or on the holy book or on our parents etc.....this is as far as i know,i hope momo or jadz or someone can help me here.ALLAH know's best
Jaisi karni waisi bharni.
Qudrat ka insaaf.
Yes...who ever were/are against Malik and had a hand in Malik's sacking are getting "justice".
Three of his seniors got the due punishment.
now only inti and ib left and then it will be a perfect end.
YK never had a problem with Malik.You need to get your facts right Anwaar sahab.
Who was the beneficiary of Malik's sacking?
and who was the beneficiary of YK's sacking?
YK was not directly involved but he could've turned the table on PCB by not playing in to their hands.
YK should not have accepted the captaincy when YS/PCB organized the rebellion against Malik.
Jaisi karni wasi bharni .... he was the outcome of a rebellion and later victim of another. (and his best buddy was leading the coup)
Abdul Majid Bhatti is a big clown
What is "clownish" about the article. All he is saying is... that YK has been saying this... according to YK's friends?
What emclub, r u sure it says Misbah in the article?
Funny how Mohd Asif was not invovle in this controversy, probably the first one in which he wasn't invovled.
But Malik is back.
either Malik wasn't one of the 7 or Bhatti is talking crap as usual
Like breaking the news 4 weeks before the fixing-gate that butt n co were playing in the hands of majeed who were bad news. Bhati was threatened by majeeds for the article at the time.
If only PCB had taken notice we would have had Amir playing today.
so Malik is back it means he wasnt involved in the oath gate....
So which 7 players this article from today's Jang... is talking about?
Like breaking the news 4 weeks before the fixing-gate that butt n co were playing in the hands of majeed who were bad news. Bhati was threatened by majeeds for the article at the time.
If only PCB had taken notice we would have had Amir playing today.
either Malik wasn't one of the 7 or Bhatti is talking crap as usual
Yousaf, butt, afridi, yawar, Malik, Akmal ....who else?
[MENTION=135038]Major[/MENTION] this is one of those report i was talking about.
after reading Intikhabs comment, now i think he was right back then. After seeing how AKthar and co conduct themselves.
Although, Malik says that the Oath taking took place at Yousufs room. Well lets say its true that it took place at Inzamams house, but still why would Inzamam be invovled in selection matters after his retirement, he himself was fed up at that time with all the media hate he was getting. The only reason why Inzamam never wanted Misbah in the team was because of his insecurities of him taking over, because as far as i know, his grooming for captaincy was discussed in the past.
After inzis retirement, Misbahs playing couldnt bother him much
Also, Misbah had scored a 100 with pakistan A at that time in t20, so he had the merit to defend his selection, plus Malik also bought Mansoor Amjad(who was a friend of Malik and ended up playing too many games for SIalkot). Now one won't say that Inzamam wanted Amjad and he asked Malik to bring him.
Is this in-regards to Malik?
ok lets suppose Misbah was a captaincy candidate but to groom a new captain for future you first need to get him in the 11 and tbh there was no spot available in the 11 for Misbah (opening slots were always open but misbah is a middle order bat) and the religious thing doesn't make any sense when Kaneria and Younus both played for Pakistan under Inzi for years.
They could had added him in the squads........ He was a regular member of the A team.
Oh well, one thing is for sure, had he played at that time, he wouldn't had been playing today and made a big name of himself and of his legendary captaincy.
Its true when they say Allah has the best saved for you.