Inzi-Misbah
Shehryar comment in his book that Inzi kept Misbah out of 11 because of religious and other reason.
Pure rubbish from Khan. Show me one innings of Misbah during his initial run, where he displayed any of the quality that he showed post-2007.
There was just one available spot in the team during the noughties, in the middle-order. Was Misbah any better than Faisal Iqbal, Malik, Razzaq and the others who batted there under Inzi? I don't think so. Misbah had a break-out year in '07 and dropping him in '09 was a poor move, I agree, but expecting the selectors and Inzi to keep Misbah in the during the mid-2000's is stretching it.
As I have already said in other threads, Inthikhab Alam merely "heard" from a friend that the oath was taken at Inzamam's house, whereas Malik, who was actually involved, has come out and said that it was held in Yousuf's hotel-room. Can that friend of Inthikhab's, distinguish one bearded, classy batsman but poor fielder from another? Seems unlikely.
Inzamam had no stake in the team after his retirement so this story of Intikhab's makes zero sense. For the people accusing him of being unfavorable to individuals based on their religious views, please explain why Kaneria and Akhtar were crucial members of his team and have nothing but praise for
aloo, even after one of them is paid to make controversial remarks on the tele and the other can gain sympathy, by playing the victim.
No need to bunch Inzamam with someone like Yousuf.