Outrage in India over video of teacher telling kids to slap Muslim student

[FPresidential]

Al Qaida is a UN sanctioned organisation.

NAZIs were waging wars.

I know our neighbours don't like RSS because its a Hindu organisation and a nationalist organisation.

Problem is that this won't make them a terrorist organisation. No matter how much our neighbours whine. Last time the PM of that country was ranting on twitter as everyone ignored their narrative on India and RSS.

As one would expected, a typical RSS/Hindutva response from every supporter.

RSS is a religiously motivated extremist Hindu organization, no one should like it in 2023. I am sure there are plenty of non-violent Hindu organization exist in India that you probably wish never existed or ceased to exist because they aren't extremist who wants beat up a disabled minorities.

Labelling them terrorist organization is not even the argument, none of us on this forum can label them as terrorist organization. If the world labelling terrorist on a merit then most of the major power would be holding that title without any difficulty.

The world is ignoring because India has the ability to buy their Gucci belt otherwise, the current India, is a 3rd world country, run by a radicalize elected government with a Gucci belt

Next time, try to be little bit original with your reply because repeated response in defense of radicalized extremists elected government is getting boring for everyone.

 

[Bewal Express]

The name was revealed as the dalit boy expired. Also the name was revealed the RSCPCR.

What does expired mean? Are you saying they take action if anyone reveals the name of a minor in a criminal case

 

[Danyal A]

New Delhi: Stating that if the allegations are true, it should shock the state's conscience, the Supreme Court today ordered that a senior IPS officer be appointed to monitor the investigation in the case where a seven-year-old was slapped repeatedly by his classmates on the instruction of their teacher in Uttar Pradesh's Muzaffarnagar. Calling it "serious and worrying", the court said it's a matter of right to life. A video of the incident had gone viral earlier this year, causing massive outrage. As the student stood crying, his classmates took turns to slap him, showed the video. The teacher was also heard in the video asking the students to hit him hard.

The top court adjourned the matter for October 30, and directed the Uttar Pradesh government to file a compliance report on counselling of students involved, and take responsibility for the education of the victim child.

The Supreme Court also recorded serious objections to the content of the FIR, which does not have the allegations levelled by the father of the child. The father had given a statement that his son was beaten because of his religion, but it wasn't mentioned in the FIR, the court said. It's a matter of quality education, which also includes sensitive education, the court said.

The Uttar Pradesh government claimed that the communal aspect of the case was exaggerated.

On September 6, the Supreme Court had issued a notice to the UP government asking for a report from the District Superintendent of Police. It asked what action had been taken against the accused, and what steps were taken to protect the child's family.

The accused 60-year-old teacher, who is also the principal of Muzaffarnagar's Neha Public School, Tripta Tyagi, first said she was not "ashamed" of her egregious act, but later put out a video message, stressing that she had no communal motive behind asking students to slap their Muslim classmate. With folded hands, she repeated that she had "made a mistake" and sought forgiveness.

Politicians across the party lines had condemned the incident as a hate crime, targeting the ruling BJP government in the state.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

New Delhi: Stating that if the allegations are true, it should shock the state's conscience, the Supreme Court today ordered that a senior IPS officer be appointed to monitor the investigation in the case where a seven-year-old was slapped repeatedly by his classmates on the instruction of their teacher in Uttar Pradesh's Muzaffarnagar. Calling it "serious and worrying", the court said it's a matter of right to life. A video of the incident had gone viral earlier this year, causing massive outrage. As the student stood crying, his classmates took turns to slap him, showed the video. The teacher was also heard in the video asking the students to hit him hard.

The top court adjourned the matter for October 30, and directed the Uttar Pradesh government to file a compliance report on counselling of students involved, and take responsibility for the education of the victim child.

The Supreme Court also recorded serious objections to the content of the FIR, which does not have the allegations levelled by the father of the child. The father had given a statement that his son was beaten because of his religion, but it wasn't mentioned in the FIR, the court said. It's a matter of quality education, which also includes sensitive education, the court said.

The Uttar Pradesh government claimed that the communal aspect of the case was exaggerated.

On September 6, the Supreme Court had issued a notice to the UP government asking for a report from the District Superintendent of Police. It asked what action had been taken against the accused, and what steps were taken to protect the child's family.

The accused 60-year-old teacher, who is also the principal of Muzaffarnagar's Neha Public School, Tripta Tyagi, first said she was not "ashamed" of her egregious act, but later put out a video message, stressing that she had no communal motive behind asking students to slap their Muslim classmate. With folded hands, she repeated that she had "made a mistake" and sought forgiveness.

Politicians across the party lines had condemned the incident as a hate crime, targeting the ruling BJP government in the state.

When the authorities want to uphold values like this, it says so much about the state of the nation, and exactly why the hindutva craze will drag Bharat down. Why would you want to defend such an abhorrent act?