If IK's sister can comment on it (reporters regularly harrass her with this question when she is only trying to meet her brother), what is stopping CM of Pakistan's biggest province to comment on it ? Ofc it doesn't have to do with this family's fraandship with Indians does it ?
This guy and major Arya are two sides of the same coin. But both entertaining as hell.
, abhee to kuch kiya bhee nahee aur inka yeh haal hain.
pakistani politicians are incompetent india or no india, its like taking credit for scaring a blind man into tripping over a rock. but i guess you need some narrative to claim a moral victory at least.Pakistan leaders are shitting in its pants...just see the statement of the incompetent politicians--
Janab, yeh to false flag operation hain...
Jhelum main ya to paani bahega warna khoon bahega...
Pani nahee milega to act of war hoga...
Nuclear weapons kab kaam aayege..
Pak Defense Minister making a fool of himself in an international interview - Yes, we were the hub for the terrorists for last 30 years. But trust us now , we are clean now...
----------
Hilarious
Yes it can loot with the fear of India and Kashmir..plus Munirs popularity was low and Pak was fighting so many internal forces...does not look like a stable situation at all
Cloudy day or 27 April was new moon..nothing happened..and will not happen as Pak forces are on alert..that would be stupid. The issue isn't attacking pak..the issue is building defense for the retaliation. Bcos modi has made it clear that the attack has to be massive .the retaliation would also be big. The other option is to goad Pakistan into making a pre emotive strike first which they can due to the statements inevitability as well as the jhelum floods. India is more focused on iwt measures.Atm the best option seems to be, sit back and keep entertained by Indians attacks via Twitter, indian news , indian posters typing faster than they can eat and thinking Pakistan is now Sahara dessert.
I'm assuming Modi is waiting for a cloudy day so radar cannot detect fighter jets
IK's sister are not in the govt.
Maryum can also give 'carefully crafted' statements but she won't. Every lalu panju in India is giving statements.
No need for Maryam to speak. It is for the central government to handle, nor is it necessary for Nawaz to speak.
Your facts are patently false
You only listen to your Pak media..China and Turkey are Pak allies and even then China on the surfacw was neutral but we all know who they will support. So kudos you have China and Turkey on your side.
Those countries you mention have all offered condolences to India. They haven't supported India in taking any action against Pakistan, nor have they supported India's baseless allegation regarding Pakistani involvement.
Little short of time ..so will sue facts to disprove your fantasy about IWT later on..except say that you are right building dams take time. Also iNdia and China are rivals but booming economyThose countries you mention have all offered condolences to India. They haven't supported India in taking any action against Pakistan, nor have they supported India's baseless allegation regarding Pakistani involvement.
Nothing material has happened regarding water. There is no water war; the treaty is in "abeyance". Even Indian outlets reckon that if India was to do anything Pakistan can challenge it in court and will win.
"
But what national security interests are likely to be fulfilled by violating the treaty? First of all, India can only influence a miniscule amount of the water flow into Pakistan right now, most of it is from glacial melt, snow melt, and monsoon rains anyway. To do more, India would have to spend thousands of crores to build large storage dams over a period of decades, for no set purpose except to threaten Pakistan. For that kind of money, India could easily overhaul its military capabilities instead, and in much quicker time.
More importantly, the restriction of water to another country is a war crime, and if India starts building the infrastructure to commit war crimes it paints itself as a villain in a region where it is fighting a desperate rearguard action against Chinese domination. As a downstream riparian to China, it will hand all the cards to its northern neighbour if China decides it will build such dams too, something it has both the financial wherewithal to do, and the engineering capability to do so much quicker than India. "
Why Putting Indus Waters Treaty ‘in Abeyance’ Has Been Counterproductive For India
This is not the first time that the Modi regime has tried to use legally dubious means vis-à-vis the treaty.thewire.in
and here
"The IWT cannot be altered unilaterally. Article XII stipulates that its provisions “may from time to time be modified by a duly ratified treaty concluded for that purpose between the two Governments.” It further clarifies that the treaty can only be terminated through a “duly ratified treaty” agreed upon by both states.
The term “hold in abeyance,” as used by India in its letter to Pakistan, is neither recognised in international law nor mentioned in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), 1969, the principal treaty governing agreements between states. “The VCLT does not use the word ‘abeyance’; it uses the term ‘suspension,’ which allows a country to suspend the operation of an entire treaty or a part of it. Suspension is distinct from termination. I believe that when India used the word ‘abeyance,’ it intended to mean ‘suspension’ rather than termination of the IWT,” Dr. Prabhash Ranjan, professor at Jindal Global Law School, told The Hindu."
Suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty: What are the implications for India and Pakistan?
India's Secretary of Water Resources puts 1960 Indus Waters Treaty on hold, sparking tensions with Pakistan.www.thehindu.com
India is not even using terrorism as its excuse for putting the treaty into abeyance. It will cite demographic changes as it has done in the past
So this is the reality infront of you. You are letting your imagination run wild with theories of burnt fuel, and bollywood fantasies of Modi swooping in for revenge when the time is right. Unfortunately in the real world we have to deal with facts and not your imagination brother.
My point was that Sharif family has shown clear tilt towards India in the past and they have never taken any hard stance against them. We should be vary of this family specially in this situation.
I have already told you the reasons and you just keep repeating it.
Brother please present facts not imagination.
Some Pakistani youtube channels banned in India, including Shoaib Akhtar's. I guess minting from Indian clicks will be coming to an end soon for most Pakistani social media websites.
Such a move will have a negative impact on the self image of western women, they will wonder why they are no longer being asked for bobs and vegene pics.
There isn't a direct route of Indian-owned fibre optic cables directly under Pakistan. India and Pakistan rely on international submarine cables for internet connectivity, and these cables form a network connecting various parts of the world. Nice try though.
India doesn't depend anything on Pakistan but Pakistan is dependent on India #fact
He is a British MP, speaking in House of Commons directly accusing Pakistan. Why would another country give a written statement on a conflict involving India and Pakistan? Has China and Turkiye given any such written statement that Pakistan wasn't involved?
Imagine if a celebrated star like Kaneria faced such injustice, what regular hindus go through there. Then we are told religion has nothing to do why PCT dont have any non-muslim players.
PCB is already included Match fixer like Aamir in the national team.
PCB is already included Match fixer like Aamir in the national team.
We can make a playing XI with 4 reserve players if we talk about fixers in Pak cricket
What has The fixing do with kaneria statement? You can't face The truth that's why you are talking nonsense.
Are you talking about yourself? What is the topic of the thread?
Hindutva has useful idiots like @uppercut, a master of lying, distorting facts, and pretending to be "serious."
We can make a playing XI with 4 reserve players if we talk about fixers in Pak cricket
However Kaneria is sharing his story from his playing days when Afridi tried to convert him. Looks like you are upset for some reason.
A Major typically does not command a forward area, although exceptions can occur under specific circumstances.
20 trees are enough for Pak army to close the area to visitors for two months..wonder how much time it takes to remove tree...but with pak it's hard to say what they are hiding..just the fact that they run terrorist camps or the fact that the bombs killed multiple pigs instead of trees
Last time when pulwanma happened and India bombed the terrorist hideout after 10 plus days...Pak retaliated in less than a day..looks like it was preplanned response ..hence proved Pak did Pulwama
