Amjid Javed
PakPassion's 100,000 posts man
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Runs
- 118,565
- Post of the Week
- 8
2nd half of the inns was fkin bollox! interms of way it was paced!
-
Contact the PP Team
Pak V Eng: ODI No 1: Lahore: Score updates and discussion thread (Pak innings)
- Thread starter Amjid Javed
- Start date
MIG
PakPassion Administrator
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Runs
- 43,972
Just goes to show how lost we are without Inzi !
Amjid Javed
PakPassion's 100,000 posts man
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Runs
- 118,565
- Post of the Week
- 8
pak 285/8
43 needed off 21 balls.
43 needed off 21 balls.
Genghis
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2005
- Runs
- 13,325
Why's everyone having a go at the batsmen??? How about the bowlers who leaked 327 runs? Kaneria is not a ODI bowler, we should have gone with Arafat and Hameed as supersub.
Raz
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Runs
- 17,391
Allott acting like a total pr*ick
Amjid Javed
PakPassion's 100,000 posts man
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Runs
- 118,565
- Post of the Week
- 8
sami gone!
pak 9 down now!
43 needed off 21 balls.
pak 9 down now!
43 needed off 21 balls.
Somali Pirate
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Runs
- 4,761
Amjid Javed said:
after the start salu and yk gave us the rest just screwed it up
Amjid Javed
PakPassion's 100,000 posts man
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Runs
- 118,565
- Post of the Week
- 8
kaneria in now.
Amjid Javed
PakPassion's 100,000 posts man
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Runs
- 118,565
- Post of the Week
- 8
kaneria out! game over!
congrats england!
congrats england!
Genghis
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2005
- Runs
- 13,325
damn we have lost 4/6 in 10 balls ...
Well that's all she wrote.
A horrible job by our bowlers, an also-ran type job by our middle order, and a sorry effort in the field were Pakistan's contributions to this game.
Taking nothing away, England batted superbly, particularly Straus, but despite the English efforts this game was there for the taking.
Inshallah the next 4 games tell a different story.
A horrible job by our bowlers, an also-ran type job by our middle order, and a sorry effort in the field were Pakistan's contributions to this game.
Taking nothing away, England batted superbly, particularly Straus, but despite the English efforts this game was there for the taking.
Inshallah the next 4 games tell a different story.
deadly_man
Tape Ball Regular
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Runs
- 539
well done england and umpires!!!
Genghis
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2005
- Runs
- 13,325
genghis81 said:
Make that 5/6 in 11 balls ... shocking lower order collapse
deadly_man
Tape Ball Regular
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Runs
- 539
but razzak was not out so dont count him as a wicketgenghis81 said:
deadly_man
Tape Ball Regular
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Runs
- 539
but razzak was not out so dont count him as a wicket after his wicket there was too much pressure on lower order batsman because of run rate so u cant do much... for me main culprit (if u r searching in batting)was youhana and malik and umpire.they were set batsman and they shud have taken the chargegenghis81 said:
RH said:
Umpires do make mistakes -they are humans after all.
However - when the mistakes happen to going against one side, then you have to wonder. Sure England got a couple of rough decisions. However, Pakistan have had far more in proportion. Especially from Darrell Hair.
deadly_man
Tape Ball Regular
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Runs
- 539
good or bad is okRH said:
but what we wants is consistancy ie decisin shudnt depends on whther its england who is batting or pakistan..if u see whole searies u will find all close decision's result depoepnded on who is batting
pacman
Local Club Star
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Runs
- 1,716
RH said:
Yeah, Razzaq was lining it up, and Hair just thought, he might not get another chance, so he had to give him out when the chance was there to give it. But not to take anything away from England, they did well to win.
