What's new

"Pakistan has helped in the dialogue between Taliban and the US in Abu Dhabi" : Imran Khan

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,988
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Pakistan has helped in the dialogue between Taliban and the US in Abu Dhabi. Let us pray that this leads to peace and ends almost three decades of suffering of the brave Afghan people. Pakistan will be doing everything within its power to further the peace process.</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1074888807248474112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 18, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
That was always what Imran Khan wanted, lets see where these peace talks will lead.
 
It's in the best interest of Pakistan to have peace in Afghanistan however this won't suit some neighbouring countries whose only motive is to keep Afghanistan as chaotic as possible. America has also finally realised the fact that no peace process can exist is Afghanistan without paksitan being a party to it. The status quo like I said suits some countries and they would try everything in their power to hault the peace process, the sooner the Americans realise this the better it's for them if they are serious about leaving Afghanistan.
 
Last edited:
US offers safety and job security to Taliban

WASHINGTON: Eager to persuade Taliban to join the Afghan peace process, the United States is offering them a safety network that includes creating job opportunities for the insurgents.

As the United States, Pakistan, China, Russia and other world powers expedite efforts to encourage the Taliban to join the Afghan peace process, the US Defence Department has also outlined a plan for rehabilitating the rebels in a new Afghanistan.

“Although some members of the Taliban may be weary of fighting and ready to lay down their weapons, they will only rejoin society if they believe their safety and the safety of their families are guaranteed, and if they have an opportunity to earn enough money to provide for their families,” says the plan that the Pentagon sent to Congress this week, along with proposals for addressing US security concerns and the interests of Afghanistan’s neighbours.

The Pentagon, however, notes that while local leaders are developing programmes that may offer a path to peace on a small scale, “the Afghan government has not developed a national reintegration programme”.

While the Trump administration appears keen to start withdrawing US forces from Afghanistan, the Pentagon advocates maintaining enough troops in Afghanistan to force the Taliban to join peace talks.

Over the past 16 months, the United States and its partners have used military force to drive the Taliban towards “a durable and incl*u*sive political settlement”.

The Pentagon report claims that this selective use of force persuaded the Taliban to accept the Eidul Fitr ceasefire in June. Even though the Taliban did not publicly accept the second ceasefire offer, “there’re indicators of support within the Taliban senior leadership and a desire to pursue negotiations,” it adds.

The Pentagon also supports the peace process initiated by US Special Represen*tative for Afghanistan Rec*o*n*ciliation (SRAR), Ambas*sador Zalmay Khalilizad, who has already held a series of meetings with Taliban in Qatar and the UAE and regularly visits Afghanistan and its neighbouring states, like Pakistan and India.

“Increased military pressure on the Taliban, international calls for peace, and the new SRAR’s engagements appear to be driving the Taliban to negotiations, says the Pentagon report.

The report, however, acknowledges that the Taliban control large portions of Afghanistan’s rural areas, and continue to attack poorly defended government checkpoints and rural districts.

A key element in the Pentagon’s proposal for persuading the Taliban to stay engaged in the peace process is to “ensure the long-term sustainability of the ANDSF”, which would “demonstrate to the Taliban the international communities’ firm resolve in Afghanistan”.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1453824/us-offers-safety-and-job-security-to-taliban
 
America is leaving Afghanistan for sure. What I am concerned about is a private firm like the notorious Blackwater continuing too make trouble there.
 
ISLAMABAD: US Senator Lindsey Graham has recommended a meeting among three world leaders pivotal to the Afghan reconciliation and peace process — Prime Minister Imran Khan, US President Donald Trump and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani.

The US senator met with PM Imran Khan today, where she lauded the leader’s vision for political resolution of the Afghan issue.

PM Imran told Senator Graham that Pakistan wants to work with all stakeholders for the Afghan peace process.

While speaking to media, the senator said that the Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa has given a dinner in his honour tonight.

He said that he will apprise the US president of these meetings. The senator said that whatever Pakistan army did in 18 months has been the US’ wish since 18 years.

Senator Graham said that the US cannot move away from Afghanistan as it has a lot to do here and Pakistan installing border fence is a positive step.

The senator said that the US has been mistaken to continuously change its policy vis-à-vis Pakistan.

https://www.geo.tv/latest/225708-us...i-and-trump-meeting-over-afghan-peace-process
 
US-Taliban peace talks raise Afghan hopes as meeting in Qatar enters fourth day

KABUL/PESHAWAR:
Talks between the United States and Afghan Taliban officials in Qatar entered a fourth day on Thursday, with the two sides trying to establish a mechanism for a ceasefire in the 17-year Afghan war and open dialogue between the insurgents and the government in Kabul.

US special peace envoy Zalmay Khalilzad’s meeting with Taliban representatives was originally slated to run over two days, and its unexpected extension was a positive sign, according to two senior Taliban leaders in Afghanistan who have been kept informed of the progress made in Qatar.

During the first two days, the talks focused on a roadmap for the withdrawal of the foreign forces and a guarantee that Afghanistan would not be used for hostile acts against the US and its allies, according to one of Taliban leaders.

“The mechanism for a ceasefire and ways to enter into an intra-Afghan dialogue were the two other big topics that were supposed to be discussed on Thursday,” he told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.

A third source based in the Gulf, who has close ties to the Taliban representatives, said the decision to extend the meeting in the Qatari capital Doha came after “positive progress” during the first two days.

Officials at the US embassy in Kabul were not immediately available to comment on the diplomatic developments.

Members of Afghanistan’s High Peace Council (AHPC), a body which oversees peace efforts but does not represent the government, said they were hoping that positive news would emerge from Doha.

“When talks take a long time it means the discussion is in a sensitive and important stage, and the participants are getting close to a positive result,” said Sayed Ehsan Taheri, the spokesperson for AHPC in Kabul.

“I hope this meeting opens a way for an intra-Afghan dialogue, he said.

The Afghan Taliban who are fighting to oust foreign troops have repeatedly rejected the offer to hold direct talks with the President Ashraf Ghani’s government, which they consider an illegitimate foreign-imposed regime.

The US and regional powers insist that the peace process should be “Afghan-led and Afghan-owned”.

Diplomatic efforts to end the United State’s longest-running conflict intensified last year after the appointment of the Afghan-born Khalilzad to lead direct talks with the Taliban.

Khalilzad has held at least four meetings with the Taliban representatives. But there has been no let up in the violence, even as the two sides hold talks over meals in a hotel suite in Doha.

And abiding fears about how Afghan government forces would withstand the Taliban threat without US military support have been heightened by reports that US President Donald Trump wants to bring home almost half of the 14,000 US troops deployed in Afghanistan.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/189590...afghan-hopes-meeting-qatar-enters-fourth-day/
 
WASHINGTON: Pakistan has begun to play a behind-the-scenes but central role in supporting US peace talks with the Afghan Taliban, including by facilitating travel to negotiations, US officials and Taliban sources say

The Pakistani assistance, which has not been reported in such detail before, also includes exerting pressure on the Taliban leaders who fail to cooperate, including by detaining members of the militants’ families, the insurgents say.

The Pakistani role in the peace negotiations is a delicate one, with Islamabad seeking to avoid demonstrating the kind of broad influence over the Taliban that Washington has long accused it of having. Sources caution its help could be temporary.

Know more: Pakistan warns US against 'harmful' allegations of providing 'safe havens to militants'

A Taliban leader says Pakistan has kept ‘unprecedented pressure’ on the militants and their relatives over the past few months

The Taliban also do not want to appear beholden to Islamabad, which has long denied US accusations that it provides safe haven and assistance to insurgents as a way to preserve influence in Afghanistan throughout its more than 17-year-old war.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly signalled his intention to wind down America’s longest conflict, declaring this week in his State of the Union address that “great nations do not fight endless wars”.

One senior US official, who declined to be identified, said of Pakistan’s role in the talks: “We know it just wouldn’t be possible without their support. They’ve facilitated some movement and travel to the discussions in Doha.”

Trump’s administration has accelerated talks for a political settlement in Afghanistan. US peace envoy Zalmay Khalilzad held six days of talks — perhaps the most productive to date — with the Taliban in Doha last month and is due to meet Taliban representatives again on Feb 25.

Taliban sources said that Pakistan’s role in bringing the militant leaders to the negotiating table was instrumental. In one instance, Islamabad sent a message to the militants through religious leaders that they had to talk to the United States or risk a cut-off in ties.

They detained Taliban members’ families as a way to pressure them, a Taliban leader told Reuters.

“I haven’t seen Pakistan so serious before,” the senior Taliban leader said.

The Taliban leader, who declined to be named, said Pakistan had kept “unprecedented pressure” on the militants and their close relatives over the past few months.

“They made it clear to us that we (Taliban) have to talk to the US and Afghan government,” the Taliban leader said.

US General Joseph Votel, who leads the US military’s Central Command, hinted at some kind of Pakistani assistance in a Senate hearing this week, saying Islamabad had “played a more helpful role”.

To be sure, current and former US officials still are highly sceptical of Islamabad and do not see any steps by Pakistan that could not be easily reversed.

Washington appears for now to be sticking to a total freeze in US assistance to Islamabad imposed over a year ago over its alleged support to the Taliban. Trump at the time accused Islamabad of rewarding past US aid with “nothing but lies & deceit”.

“There’s some self-interest obviously involved here ... I would be wary of taking that and extrapolating off that and saying they’re now on board with the peace process,” said Jason Campbell, who was the Pentagon’s Afghanistan country director until last year.

Pullout pressure
Pakistani sources suggest that the driver behind their country’s support for the talks is not US aid but growing concerns over the regional economic shockwaves that could follow an abrupt US pullout from Afghanistan.

Those concerns have been strengthened by Trump’s surprise decision in December to withdraw completely from Syria, despite objections from the Pentagon.

There are only about 14,000 US troops in Afghanistan at the moment, but their presence ensures a continuous flow of US financial assistance to Afghanistan.

Islamabad, running short of foreign exchange reserves and in talks with the International Monetary Fund over what would be its 13th bailout since the 1980s, says it cannot afford to see Afghanistan slide into chaos just as Pakistan is trying to attract foreign investors to shore up its own economy.

“That is our main worry in all of this,” said a senior official who is closely involved in cross-border relations. “We have enough economic issues of our own to deal with already.”

One of the most notable public signs of Pakistan’s willingness to aid the negotiations was the release of Taliban leader Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar.

Now the newly appointed chief negotiator, Baradar is expected to fly from Pakistan to attend the next round of negotiations in Doha on Feb 25.

Dan Feldman, a former US special representative for Afgh*anistan and Pakistan, said he believed Washington was still hesitant to become too hopeful about Pakistan’s change in posture.

“There is cautious appreciation for the fact that Pakistan has seemingly done more than before to be helpful,” Feldman said, before adding that it did not "suggest a sea change in Pakistan’s position".

https://www.dawn.com/news/1462714/pakistan-in-behind-the-scenes-push-to-aid-us-taliban-talks
 
Back
Top