Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I think it is not fair with Abdullah.Huraira and Saim should start. Some minnow bashing on home turf to build up their confidence.
Everyone looking trimmer too, good to see.
Rizwan's record in tests in very good though and he is an excellent wickekeeper. Sarfraz is a great batter to have in home conditions but his wicketkeeping is a massive liability. And in test matches dropped catches have a massive snowball effectI am not in favour of them either, but I am in favour of a farewell match for Rizwan, you know because am kind and Ramadan preparation has started today for me.
I don’t care, don’t want him in the team and he isn’t exactly Adam Gilchrist anywayRizwan's record in tests in very good though and he is an excellent wickekeeper. Sarfraz is a great batter to have in home conditions but his wicketkeeping is a massive liability. And in test matches dropped catches have a massive snowball effect
Rizwan is an excellent wicket keeper in non pressure situations.Rizwan's record in tests in very good though and he is an excellent wickekeeper. Sarfraz is a great batter to have in home conditions but his wicketkeeping is a massive liability. And in test matches dropped catches have a massive snowball effect
How can you find out if someone has class or not, without trying them.Currently there is no test class WK besides Rizwan and Sarfaraz so he warrants his place.
Because Pakistan doesn't understand that traditionally wicket keepers are specialists and not ace players.ATM, nobody in the domestic circuit is there to replace Rizwan or Sarfaraz, unfortunately.
Who should you play instead of Rizwan?? HASEEBULLAH??? I beg your pardon, he is the worst guy to be playing ahead of sarfaraz, let alone Rizwan.
I am exclusively talking about tests.... Bangladesh series thread this is... No point arguing over T20s in this thread.Because Pakistan doesn't understand that traditionally wicket keepers are specialists and not ace players.
Rizwan and his fans have been hiding behind the wicket keeping clause for decades when in reality fakhar zaman and Saud shakeel are perfect to bat at opening in t20 and no 4 in odi ahead of this clown.
Sarfraz and Mohammad haris being makeshift is exactly the type of wk batter Pakistan needed aka players who are willing to be makeshift at any order from no 1 to no 8 for the team.
That's how Wasim Bari functioned, That's how moin Khan functioned, In Australia josh inglis, Alex Carrey, Mattew wade fucntion in a similar manner.
You need to be a once in a generational WK batsmen like QDK, Gilchrist, Jos Butler etc to justify a certain no, Even Pant, KL rahul, Sanju Sampson are makeshift shuffling from no 1 to no 5 for the team.
It's not Loyal Pakistani fans fault that people are hiding behind the whole wk clause to protect a leg side hack in odi and a God awful t20 opener.
Ask yourself, who did Rizwan replace? Did he replace Sarfraz a makeshift keeper? Hell no he replaced Fakhar Zaman an established opener in t20 and Salman Ali agha/Saud Shakeel in odi.
Yet you want fans to name wicket keeping replacements for a fraud who replaced proper batsmen/batting allrounders?
It applies to all formats irrespective of series.I am exclusively talking about tests.... Bangladesh series thread this is... No point arguing over T20s in this thread.
The traditional WK died when Gilly changed the role to a batsman who can keep. In some cases they are also exceptional WKs and cases they are barely able to put on gloves( although with choice most teams have they are very rare bar Kami after his finger injury).Because Pakistan doesn't understand that traditionally wicket keepers are specialists and not ace players.
Rizwan and his fans have been hiding behind the wicket keeping clause for decades when in reality fakhar zaman and Saud shakeel are perfect to bat at opening in t20 and no 4 in odi ahead of this clown.
Sarfraz and Mohammad haris being makeshift is exactly the type of wk batter Pakistan needed aka players who are willing to be makeshift at any order from no 1 to no 8 for the team.
That's how Wasim Bari functioned, That's how moin Khan functioned, In Australia josh inglis, Alex Carrey, Mattew wade fucntion in a similar manner.
You need to be a once in a generational WK batsmen like QDK, Gilchrist, Jos Butler etc to justify a certain no, Even Pant, KL rahul, Sanju Sampson are makeshift shuffling from no 1 to no 5 for the team.
It's not Loyal Pakistani fans fault that people are hiding behind the whole wk clause to protect a leg side hack in odi and a God awful t20 opener.
Ask yourself, who did Rizwan replace? Did he replace Sarfraz a makeshift keeper? Hell no he replaced Fakhar Zaman an established opener in t20 and Salman Ali agha/Saud Shakeel in odi.
Yet you want fans to name wicket keeping replacements for a fraud who replaced proper batsmen/batting allrounders?
It's a shout. But shouldn't Babar go to #3 given a lot of his dismissals vs spin ?Pakistan’s middle order should be:
3. Kamran
4. Babar
5. Saud
Shan should open. You need to brood in Kamran Ghulam now and try and get 6-7 years of solid cricket (50 Tests) from him
I don't fail to Understand anything.The traditional WK died when Gilly changed the role to a batsman who can keep. In some cases they are also exceptional WKs and cases they are barely able to put on gloves( although with choice most teams have they are very rare bar Kami after his finger injury).
What you fail to understand is that they are needed as you can't balance teams especially in T20 or ODI without a WK who can bat and average close to 40 in tests. Both Riz and Sarfi and even Kami were or are good test batsman.
I think Babar bats at 4 because that’s where he is comfortable. You can’t expect him to do something that takes him out of his comfort zone, even if it’s the best for him.It's a shout. But shouldn't Babar go to #3 given a lot of his dismissals vs spin ?
Kamran and Saud to follow ?
Babar should not even be playing a series against Bangladesh in the first place lol. He should be getting out of his comfort zone and not within it.It's a shout. But shouldn't Babar go to #3 given a lot of his dismissals vs spin ?
Kamran and Saud to follow ?
He’s uselessAll this talk about needing another spinner;
What happened to Mohammad Nawaz?!
I demand a public inquiry!
Pakistan’s very own Wellalage!
He’s useless
So Buttler and Bairstow were makeshift but helped win a WC. Pants moved up the order and didn't kick out batsman and was part of a team that won the WC.I don't fail to Understand anything.
No one said wk batters can't bat. Moin Lhan could bat very well, Heck wasim bari was a good batsmen it's just his international stats were poor and don't reflect his caliber as a batsmen.
Mattew wade from Australia played a freak innings in 2021 world cup to get Australia into the finals.
However even to this day almost every wk batter is makeshift from no 1 to no 7 and under no circumstances do they replace proper established batsmen in the squad.
The only way that happens is if their genuinely generational batters for their own country, For example gurbaz is average if you compare him to top sides but he's generational for Afghanistan standards considering their lack of infrastructure.
Sarfraz was makeshift and batted where it was required, he didn't replace someone like falhar zaman who is the only batsmen since saeed Anwar who can hit 150+ scores and play the X factor role, Similarly he didn't replace Babar at 3.
Even Kamran Akmal by 2012 started batting at no 7 in the India vs Pakistan odi series because he was no longer needed as an opener.
Rizwan on the other hand alo side Chacha were Misbah buddies under SNGPL. They weren't apart of the unit but were shoved into the team to save their careers.
Chacha was useless at no 4 and no 5 because he couldn't read Wrist spin so to save his career misbah shoved him at no 7 and babar has sometimes shoved chacha at no 8 or no 9 if a wrist spinner is bowling lol in the same vein as Babar keeps abrar out and abouds bowling shadab to batsmen and only bowls him to no 10.
Rizwan is no different, he played like a tail enders in t20 for years at every position and excluding C string Australia 100's in pindi roads where even Imam ul haq frauded his way to 2 centuries, Rizwan was a tail enders in odi.
In order to save his career, Misbah shoved him at opening in t20 and babar shoved him at no 4 in odi because even though fakhar was providing rr starts and contributing to the no 1 ranked side in t20 and Agha scored back to back half centuries at no 4,
Rizwan who was failing at the lower end had to squeeze threw.
Chacha, Abdullah shafiq, Irfan Khan niazi, Rizwan etc all part of the SNGPL gang of hoodlums.
So you want Babar dropped. What is wrong with you guysBabar should not even be playing a series against Bangladesh in the first place lol. He should be getting out of his comfort zone and not within it.
He should play difficult series against top sides and focus on improving his form which has declined and improve his sr.
He bats at opening in t20 because opening is the easiest position to score, get runs and bat through as well as get milestones. However he doesn't understand the purpose of opening in t20 and it being easy is to utilise the PP hence why your most explosive batsmen play at that no.
No 4 is fine for bobby because it will push him against spin. Even then I'm not happy he's playing this series against a weak time on pindi roads. Such easy batting conditions means he's defo going to perform, his fans will do bhrangra and then he'll get another beating at another tournament.
That's the issue with players like Misbah, Babar, Rizwan. They get angry as soon as you suggest them to shift their positions for the team because their reluctant to improve and get put of their comfort zone.
I still remember rizwan's " I'm not happy batting at no 5" or Misbah's " If I move up the order, who will protect no 5, kya mein chockei nahi Marta?"
Butler is a once in a generational Talent who is England's Greatest wk batsmen ever all time, I mentioned clearly Gilchrist, Butler, Qdk are exceptions for very obvious reasons.So Buttler and Bairstow were makeshift but helped win a WC. Pants moved up the order and didn't kick out batsman and was part of a team that won the WC.
I am.confused as to what you are saying. These are WKs that are excellent batsman and they are used by teams as part of strategy. I think you have you knickers in a twist because you think Riz has kept out guys like FZ with an average 22 over 90 matches with a SR of 132 and he has a licence to play. It's hardly earth shattering. I accept that taking a pure average can hide many factors and statistics aren't wholesome. Let's look at Sharjeel,another that is often quoted on here as a saviour. An average of 22 with a SR of 133. So this idea that we had some amazing players not given chances is just plain rubbish. Riz is limited relative to International players but compared to the others in our team, he is Don Bradman.
Rizwan is Don Bradman compares to others?So Buttler and Bairstow were makeshift but helped win a WC. Pants moved up the order and didn't kick out batsman and was part of a team that won the WC.
I am.confused as to what you are saying. These are WKs that are excellent batsman and they are used by teams as part of strategy. I think you have you knickers in a twist because you think Riz has kept out guys like FZ with an average 22 over 90 matches with a SR of 132 and he has a licence to play. It's hardly earth shattering. I accept that taking a pure average can hide many factors and statistics aren't wholesome. Let's look at Sharjeel,another that is often quoted on here as a saviour. An average of 22 with a SR of 133. So this idea that we had some amazing players not given chances is just plain rubbish. Riz is limited relative to International players but compared to the others in our team, he is Don Bradman.
Let's come back to this argument.Very long list but we have watched his career. We know, and also the other teams know that he is our best player although recently he has struggled.
We are the fans. Who are youLet's come back to this argument.
1) Firstly who's We?
2) Secondly saying I have watched this and that is not a counter by any metric. It doesn't debunk the present information I presented, nor does it address it.
So who are these amazing players that Riz has displaced unjustly.Rizwan is Don Bradman compares to others?
This is probably the worst take I have seen on here, and this is the very same place I've heard the phrase of wanting to ban India in totality from cricket because IPL is too entertaining for some.
Butler is a once in a generational Talent who is England's Greatest wk batsmen ever all time, I mentioned clearly Gilchrist, Butler, Qdk are exceptions for very obvious reasons.
The rest are not. Pant, Sanju Sampson and KL rahul are all makeshift batters who slot anywhere from no 1 to no 5, They don't inheritanly block pathways for anyone. Same case with wade, Carrey and Inglis.
Rizwan isn't one of them, He's a failure who was boosted up the order so his career could be saved.
You people view cricket as a simulator game, It's the same reason why that nonsense Misbah vs Inzi thread was made lol.
Kamran gulaam is just average he had just one good season..same with hurraira but as we are desperate i think he can do a yunus khan role..saim.is no where ready. Finally i was fan of saud shakeel too but again he hasnt lit the world on fire i would even say Indias washington Sundar and Axar Patel are bettee than these so called battersWell you disproved your own theory. What about Sanga? Does he not count? Wk and batsman. Does Dhoni not count. I got no idea what you are on about. Not all WK batsman are going to succeed but they bring balance.
What you are saying is what we know, our players are very average. You would think that Babar and Riz are holding back Viv and Sachin, when we know that the next guys are very,very average. Kamran deserves his chance because of his runs but is the FC capable of filtering out the dross? Not on the evidence we have seen. Hurraira is a good player of spin like his uncle but looks awkward against the quicker bowlers. I like Saud because he has shown real improvement on the SC wickets, he struggled on the quicker wickets in Australia and that will be a problem for him if he hopes to become anything better than averageKamran gulaam is just average he had just one good season..same with hurraira but as we are desperate i think he can do a yunus khan role..saim.is no where ready. Finally i was fan of saud shakeel too but again he hasnt lit the world on fire i would even say Indias washington Sundar and Axar Patel are bettee than these so called batters
I think Kamran Ghulam must play ahead Salman Ali Agha and we cant go with Amir Jamal as 3rd tast bowler... we need experienced bowler like Kamran Shahzad as a 3rd seamer.Shan Masood
Abdullah Shafique
Babar Azam
Saud Shakeel
Salman Ali Agha
Kamran Ghulam
Mohammad Rizwan
Aamir Jamal
Abrar Ahmed
Naseem Shah
Shaheen Shah Afridi
Khurram Shahzad,
Mohammad Ali,
Mohammad Huraira,
Saim Ayub,
Bro hurriara can be younis khan because he is young and i want to ask are you happy with the squad looks quite refreshing and nice but do you see lack of spinner a issue or pak are covered with all bases?What you are saying is what we know, our players are very average. You would think that Babar and Riz are holding back Viv and Sachin, when we know that the next guys are very,very average. Kamran deserves his chance because of his runs but is the FC capable of filtering out the dross? Not on the evidence we have seen. Hurraira is a good player of spin like his uncle but looks awkward against the quicker bowlers. I like Saud because he has shown real improvement on the SC wickets, he struggled on the quicker wickets in Australia and that will be a problem for him if he hopes to become anything better than average
Let's hope so. We need at least 6-8 young batsman to force each other to improve through competition. Our young batsman are poor at developing into even half decent batsman.Bro hurriara can be younis khan because he is young and i want to ask are you happy with the squad looks quite refreshing and nice but do you see lack of spinner a issue or pak are covered with all bases?
Its not a question of scared.How can you find out if someone has class or not, without trying them.
If are scared to give chances to young guys against one of the weakest test opposition in the World, then we might as well quit test cricket.
In whose world is Butler England s greatest ever WK batter.Butler is a once in a generational Talent who is England's Greatest wk batsmen ever all time, I mentioned clearly Gilchrist, Butler, Qdk are exceptions for very obvious reasons.
The rest are not. Pant, Sanju Sampson and KL rahul are all makeshift batters who slot anywhere from no 1 to no 5, They don't inheritanly block pathways for anyone. Same case with wade, Carrey and Inglis.
Rizwan isn't one of them, He's a failure who was boosted up the order so his career could be saved.
You people view cricket as a simulator game, It's the same reason why that nonsense Misbah vs Inzi thread was made lol.
You're not even making any sense.Well you disproved your own theory. What about Sanga? Does he not count? Wk and batsman. Does Dhoni not count. I got no idea what you are on about. Not all WK batsman are going to succeed but they bring balance.
You genuinely have no clue what you're talking about.So who are these amazing players that Riz has displaced unjustly.
Compared to the match fixers and lard arses you keep talking about. Riz averages more than Twice the guys you guys talk about- 48 with a SR of 126. What did Bradman do in his career compared to the others.
So you speak as a collective entity? How many share your point of view?We are the fans. Who are you
Who is the biggest brand in PK cricketSo you speak as a collective entity? How many share your point of view?
So averages don't matter. So if the average of each player is 5, how many runs will the team score,You genuinely have no clue what you're talking about.
Avg and SR are interlinked. If a player doesn't perform then the SR decreases.
Check Fakhar's SR when he hit 91 or his sr during his 150+ exploits and see how high is sr is.
T20 is where averages don't matter which is why rizwan had been a bottle job.
Who has the highest average? Riz or these 2 greats?You're not even making any sense.
You're choosing 2 all time greats and are comparing them to rizwan lol
Listen, you need to leave your couch and get out more. If you claim that Riz and Babar are useless, name some alternatives. There was some guy that wanted AA as captain, Sharjeel and even UA.You genuinely have no clue what you're talking about.
Avg and SR are interlinked. If a player doesn't perform then the SR decreases.
Check Fakhar's SR when he hit 91 or his sr during his 150+ exploits and see how high is sr is.
T20 is where averages don't matter which is why rizwan had been a bottle job.
Listen, you need to leave your couch and get out more. If you claim that Riz and Babar are useless, name some alternatives. There was some guy that wanted AA as captain, Sharjeel and even UA.
We saw AA in Australia and he looked worse than a number 10. Get rid of all these guys but you need proper alternatives. So far the only suggestions are tried and tested failures.AA and UA later order is better than Ifti/Shadab
By 100% honest. Who is the better T20 batter. Travis Head or Rizwan?Who has the highest average? Riz or these 2 greats?
And you need to start addressing the actual arguments rather then go on an sarcastic Insult spree.Listen, you need to leave your couch and get out more. If you claim that Riz and Babar are useless, name some alternatives. There was some guy that wanted AA as captain, Sharjeel and even UA.
I said their interlinked, not that they don't matter. Again you need better comprehension skillsSo averages don't matter. So if the average of each player is 5, how many runs will the team score,
My point is you're one person with an opinion and not a collective entity.Who is the biggest brand in PK cricket
No. Babar and Riz have 1000s of followers so it is a we. You may not be part of the we but that is fineMy point is you're one person with an opinion and not a collective entity.
People will not have the exact same viewpoint as you for obvious reasons.
At best they can have a similar viewpoint but not the same one. In other words this WE WE mantra has no rhyme or reason to be applicable.
What is your point. All i see is lots of rubbish from you. Answer the point and make suggestions on alternatives. I support PK so anyone that will make us better is good with me. So the forum is yoursAnd you need to start addressing the actual arguments rather then go on an sarcastic Insult spree.
Is Travis available to play for PK? Tell me an alternative to Riz that isn't getting a game for PK because of Riz.By 100% honest. Who is the better T20 batter. Travis Head or Rizwan?
Again who is the better t20 player Travis or Rizwan?Is Travis available to play for PK? Tell me an alternative to Riz that isn't getting a game for PK because of Riz.
Because your argument is meaningless, it's a hypothetical scenario and none of the players that I've mentioned like sanga or butler average 5You asked about the average and then I explained that if all the players averaged 5, you have kacked you pants. Why
Answer the point. You brought up averages not mattering, so answer the pointBecause your argument is meaningless, it's a hypothetical scenario and none of the players that I've mentioned like sanga or butler average 5
Why does that matter? If Travis was a PK then it's a question worth discussing.Again who is the better t20 player Travis or Rizwan?
Just answer the question. Who’s a better T20 opener, Head or Rizwan?Why does that matter? If Travis was a PK then it's a question worth discussing.
Rizwan averages 48Answer the point. You brought up averages not mattering, so answer the point or does your intellect not allow you to.
It's not my fault you took the argument so literally.Answer the point. You brought up averages not mattering, so answer the point
Your argument was Rizwan averages more then 2x the guys I talk about, And I talked about QDK, Butler, Travis etc etc.Why does that matter? If Travis was a PK then it's a question worth discussing.
Theor tournament averages against top sides plummet like a house of cards.Rizwan averages 48
Babar averages 43
Pakistan are ranked 7
They got beaten by USA and didn’t make it to the next round of the T20 World Cup
Where does Babar and Rizwan’s average matter?
No,he averages 2× any other PK that you guys jabber on about..Your argument was Rizwan averages more then 2x the guys I talk about, And I talked about QDK, Butler, Travis etc etc.
So who is the better t20 opener, Travis or Rizwan.
So you have no idea of averages relate to overall picture. ThanksIt's not my fault you took the argument so literally.
The whole argument was that averages and SR are interlinked.
None of the people we have discussed have an average of 5, so it's meaningless.
We didnt lose and dont lose just because they are failing. Do the other batsman not have any role, although they take the biggest responsibility as the senior players.Rizwan averages 48
Babar averages 43
Pakistan are ranked 7
They got beaten by USA and didn’t make it to the next round of the T20 World Cup
Where does Babar and Rizwan’s average matter?
As we are talking PK players, why does it matter. It shows how silly you guys are. If Travis was a PK then it's more than a relevant Question but as he isn't, he could be Viv or Kohli, it's irrelevant.Just answer the question. Who’s a better T20 opener, Head or Rizwan?
Who is a better T20 opener, Head or Rizwan?As we are talking PK players, why does it matter. It shows how silly you guys are. If Travis was a PK then it's more than a relevant Question but as he isn't, he could be Viv or Kohli, it's irrelevant.
Drop them and see what happensWe didnt lose and dont lose just because they are failing. Do the other batsman not have any role, although they take the biggest responsibility as the senior players.
So lets drop them and but please name alternatives and don't give me Sharjeel, the tailender AA and the UA.
Why is it so difficult to answer the question of Travis head vs Rizwan? Is it because it shoes how faulty your average argument is?No,he averages 2× any other PK that you guys jabber on about..
No it's you who has no idea and are deliberately avoiding the question.So you have no idea of averages relate to overall picture. Thanks
Wrong, you shifted the argument when you got cornered.As we are talking PK players, why does it matter. It shows how silly you guys are. If Travis was a PK then it's more than a relevant Question but as he isn't, he could be Viv or Kohli, it's irrelevant.
@Bewal Express I have a better question for you.Drop them and see what happens
Replace them with anyone. You are 7th, not 1 loool
I asked you a simple question- give me alternatives to these guys that are credible. Instead you keep avoiding the question. I want PK to win, if we have better players than these 2,let's get them in. But who are they?@Bewal Express I have a better question for you.
What's the avg and sr of Babar and rizwan in tournaments specifically 2022 and 2024 t20 wc?
It's easy to score on Ireland and pindi school boy pitches. Hence Imam averaging 63 in pindi but 23 overseas.
Actually you're avoiding my question on Travis vs Rizwan.I asked you a simple question- give me alternatives to these guys that are credible. Instead you keep avoiding the question. I want PK to win, if we have better players than these 2,let's get them in. But who are they?
I am talking about PK players. It makes no difference if Riz is 10× worse Travis or Sharma because they can't play for PK. If Riz is holding others back, then who are they.Wrong, you shifted the argument when you got cornered.
I never once brought up Pakistani players. My discussion that you responded to was the role of specialist keepers and why people like rizwan are outside their jurisdiction.
I claimed the only rhyme or reason for a wk to replace actual batsmen is if their once in a generational talents.
Sanga, Butler, Gilchrist, Dhoni are all generational talents otherwise wk batters are historically makeshift which is the case qith Pant and wade etc.
You shifted the focal point to talk about rizwan as am opener and talk about his glorious average which is why Travis head is now brought in since he's an opener.
Pakistani players are irrelevant to the discussion, I asked a simple question whose a superior batsmen between the 2, Travis or Rizwan. Rizwan has a higher average then Travis correct.
So it should be a very simple answer for you.
I have replied to you. We are not looking to improve the World 11, we want a better PK team. So who are the guys that are better than these guys. I am all earsNo it's you who has no idea and are deliberately avoiding the question.
I asked who's better Travis head or Rizwan as an opener. Whether TH is a pakistani or not is irrelevant.
I repeat who's a better opening batsmen between these 2. Travis head averages 33 in t20 and Rizwan Averages 48 so who's superior between these 2?