What's new

Pakistan v Australia | 2nd Test | 3/11/2014 | Abu Dhabi l Day 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kami was another level..


Thanks we got rid of him for good.. plus i am sure he was a fixer.


He was surely amongst the fixers. I have seen a video of him missing the stumps when batsmen was way out of the crease. I reckon, it was from a match against Aussies. Regardless, it was a blatant act.
 
I hate these pitches.. fast bowlers are completely neutralized.


Test cricket becomes so much boring and irritating without the fast bowling factor.
 
loll really? unless they throw their wickets away I don't see how can you get them out..pitch is dead road.

I believe the theory is that if you set Australia 500 over 5 sessions we'll be done enough to go for it from the start

Not that it matters. Easy win coming up
 
Nice batting. Dig in guys. That will be better for Pakistan when they face New Zealand . Because then the confidence will be back to normal. We were getting hyper confident
 
And out :out

Hafeez will play the next test match...

Damn you marsh.. got out on a nothing ball.
 
Lmao why would not want to see Pakistan win? What kind of a fan are you? :)))
 
If only hafeez plays as a bowler I wouldnt mind.. he is ruining the opening position with undisputed mediocre batting.
 
Haddin again almost hit the ball twice, this is too much if he really do it again Pak must appeal. So much for sportsman spirit
 
[MENTION=132373]Convict[/MENTION] would you bring on a pacer and bounce Haddin out?
 
Exploiting the new ball is our only hope now.
 
Next session is do or die for both teams if Aus lose 1 wicket at max. draw will be most likely outcome but if Pak manage atleast 3 wicket other than smith or even two wickets including of smith's, than pak will defo win. But if say aus lose two wickets and smith is still on crease at tea or Aus only lose one wicket but that of smith than it will be fifty fifty going into last session.
 
Won't be long now. Typical loss of concentration from Smith.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top