The cricket enthusiast
First Class Player
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Runs
- 2,658
pak shouldve easily got 350 here with decent finisher.
wow rizwan now instead of imad
wow rizwan now instead of imad
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These type of hundreds doesn't help the team to be honest.
Just 3 wickets and still struggling to get to 300?
Since when did playing wit singles and doubles got the definition of PROPER CRICKET?? Or perfect game
I blame Safraz today. 14 ball 8 coming in, in that position. Should be more like 14 ball 29 or atleast 25. That would change the entire game.
Pak with be short by 20 runs atleast on this flat wicket.
yawn..bring back razaaq..bring back moin khan I say..drop babar and sarfi..
These type of hundreds doesn't help the team to be honest.
Just 3 wickets and still struggling to get to 300?
If you mean 20 runs short of a winning total then no, Windies can't play spin at all so Pakistan should still win comfortably.
If you mean they should have scored more runs given the way Babar and Azhar batted for the first half of the innings then yes, Pakistan should have been aiming for 350.
This is going to be a chaseble total.Pakistan need to know how to finish.
Somebody tell Sarf that only 3 overs are left...![]()
Oh lord Sarf is still nudging it around![]()
This is not sarfarazs game .. idk why they keep sending him low down .. he is more of a gap finding .. single double kinda player with the odd boundary
This is not sarfarazs game .. idk why they keep sending him low down .. he is more of a gap finding .. single double kinda player with the odd boundary
Because Babar and and Azhar can already do that job. Maybe you switch him with Malik and send him at #4, but no higher.
Play Umar Akmal instead of Rizwan...it gives you flexbility
Oh bhai kya hogya hai apko. 300 is on the card. This WI team dont like running between wicket, they will be stuck on 1 end like a ducks and will throw away their wickets. Pakistan already have enough runs on the board.
Get with the times bro, Sarf hit four fours in last match. He is better hitter than Razzaq..
A terrible end to the innings here!
Really haven't been able to capitalised on what was a fantastic start.
Having said that - even though WI batting looked good in the last match - I'd still be shocked if they chase this down.
The highest score at this ground is 313 - just for the record![]()
Nawaz is a better hitter compared to the overrated Imad, should of sent him ahead.
What is the lowest innings score, batting first, with 2 batsmen hitting hundreds?
Somebody tell Sarf that only 3 overs are left...![]()
I think they should have been flexible with our order given the position we found ourselves in Rizzy and Imad should have been promoted, only somewhat "power hitters" we have
doubt he could do much in four overs...
Sarfaraz almost run a ball
Australia v India in Jaipur 1986 - 250/3 from 47 overs, Marsh and Boon both scored a hundred opening the batting.
Second lowest is also in a shortened game, Pakistan scored 252/3 in 33 overs against India in 1982.
Lowest total with 2 centurions in a full 50 over first innings is India v Pakistan in 2005.
India scored 281/8, Sehwag and Dravid scored 108 and 104 respectively.