What's new

Pakistan vs England, 1st ODI, Cardiff: Updates

BIG SHOUT, 2 strauss, not given...........WAS PLUM!!!!!

Billy being biased as usual
 
again hits the pads, but down leg this time.

shud have had a wicket in that over, strauss was PLUM!!!!
 
Akhtar looks like Vincent Vega from Pulp Fiction with his hair like that. :D

He'll still skittle us for 150 though.
 
ugh...this is gay...wicket in the first over...but noooooooooooooooo
 
I can kind of understand why Doctrove said not out, at full speed you can't really tell if it was definitely pitching outside legstump or not
 
I think Akhtar is in the process of growing his hair longer

It'll be ready for the champions trophy :D
 
Oh we are off again, Pakistan fans moaning and were only an over into the game. It was going down legside.
 
Big Mac said:
I can kind of understand why Doctrove said not out, at full speed you can't really tell if it was definitely pitching outside legstump or not

But it was hitting the middle of middle.
 
Easa said:
But it was hitting the middle of middle.

Which is totally irrelevant if the umpire thinks it may have pitched outside legstump.
 
Forget that now, he edged it.

Brilliant decision.
 
Easa said:
Forget that now, he edged it.

Brilliant decision.
typical, mouthing off before getting your facts straight. Where have i seen this before from you :21:
 
Rob H said:
typical, mouthing off before getting your facts straight. Where have i seen this before from you :21:

Shutup, fool.

Even the umps said it was plumb before the snicko, so shut it.
 
Pepsi™ said:
doctrove screwed up again? im sorry cuz i cant hear anything...just watch

A bitter Pakistan fan who is scared to admit the truth? Never would I have imagined such a thing! :21:
 
Easa said:
Shutup, fool.

Even the umps said it was plumb before the snicko, so shut it.
What i thought the umpire gave it not out. Am i wrong? :))
 
Easa said:
Shutup, fool.

Even the umps said it was plumb before the snicko, so shut it.


and if it was an edge i DOUBT deaf doctrove heard it anyway.
 
A poor over from Asif goes for 4 while a poor over from Sami goes for 16. thats the diferrence.
 
evertonfan said:
A bitter Pakistan fan who is scared to admit the truth? Never would I have imagined such a thing! :21:

heh? dude...shut up...u dont make any sense
 
evertonfan said:
A bitter Pakistan fan who is scared to admit the truth? Never would I have imagined such a thing! :21:


and what truth might that be ?
 
Pepsi™ said:
heh? dude...shut up...u dont make any sense

Funny, I was about to say the same thing about you.

Afridi takes a catch, Chuck-asif gets rid of Strauss.
 
Muyazzim Khan said:
A poor over from Asif goes for 4 while a poor over from Sami goes for 16. thats the diferrence.
But Sami is a genuine pacer, a few extra runs and a few less wickets and a few games lost as a consequence are nothing. He has genuine pace - thats all that matters
 
Ball jams into the stumps and the bails didn't move .....


I think the bails are the reincarnation of D. Hair
 
Daoud said:
But Sami is a genuine pacer, a few extra runs and a few less wickets and a few games lost as a consequence are nothing. He has genuine pace - thats all that matters

:))) :)))
 
7 extras already we need to keep our discipline because amidst the extras the bowling has been decent.
 
excellent bowling from asif, poor shoaib duznt get a wicket who has bowled so well so far
 
Back
Top