What's new

Pick your best Test XI of 2019

Sin Nombre

Local Club Regular
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Runs
1,649
Mine is

Mayank
Latham
Labuschagne
Smith
Kohli
Watling
Stokes
Jadeja
Cummins
Starc
Shami

4 Aussies, 4 Indians, 2 Kiwis, 1 Pom

Bench: Williamson, Babar, Ishant, Lyon, Holder, QdK

What's yours?
 
Babar should have been there. Unfortunately for him, Labu started to score heavily against Pakistan so Labu has edged past Babar due to his current form

But I'd put him ahead of Kohli.
He has nearly the same number of runs as Kohli but has one more hundred.
 
Last edited:
Babar:
11 innings
616 runs
3 hundreds
3 fifties
0 zeros

Kohli:
11 innings
612 runs
2 hundreds (inc. a double hundred)
2 fifties
2 zeros

Kohli's runs inflated due to the 254 he scored against SA. A great innings but if you remove that, Kohli's not been very consistent. Babar on the other hand has been very consistent

I want to choose Babar over Kohli (and I did) but it seems a bit weird considering how good of a player Kohli actually is.
 
Babar over Labuchgne based upon any standard. Labu has nothing to show outside of Aus.
 
1. Mayank Agarwal
2. Tom Latham
3. Marnus Labushagne
4. Steve Smith (c?)
5. Ajinka Rahane
6. Ben Stokes
7. BJ Watling (wk)
8. Pat Cummins
9. Nathan Lyon
10. Mohammed Shami
11. Josh Hazelwood

Kohli doesn't deserve to be in the test XI at all. Is Steve Smith able to be captain?
 
1. Mayank
2. Latham
3. Smith
4. Babar
5. Kohli
6. Stokes
7. Watling
8. Cummins
9. Star
10. Lyon
11. Shami/ Bumrah
 
Mine is

Mayank
Latham
Labuschagne
Smith
Kohli
Watling
Stokes
Jadeja
Cummins
Starc
Shami

4 Aussies, 4 Indians, 2 Kiwis, 1 Pom

Bench: Williamson, Babar, Ishant, Lyon, Holder, QdK

What's yours?

Very solid team. I am assuming Kohli is the captain. I will go with the same but replace Babar with Rahane from bench.
 
1. Mayank Agarwal
2. Tom Latham
3. Marnus Labushagne
4. Steve Smith (c?)
5. Ajinka Rahane
6. Ben Stokes
7. BJ Watling (wk)
8. Pat Cummins
9. Nathan Lyon
10. Mohammed Shami
11. Josh Hazelwood

Kohli doesn't deserve to be in the test XI at all. Is Steve Smith able to be captain?

True.
Kohli hasn't played THAT well this year.

My team will be the same as this except I'll play Starc instead of Lyon and replace Labu with Babar because that has to be done.

1. Mayank Agarwal
2. Tom Latham
3. Steve Smith (c)
4. Babar Azam
5. Ajinkya Rahane
6. Ben Stokes
7. BJ Watling (wk)
8. Pat Cummins
9. Mitchell Starc
10. Mohammed Shami
11. Josh Hazelwood
 
True.
Kohli hasn't played THAT well this year.

My team will be the same as this except I'll play Starc instead of Lyon and replace Labu with Babar because that has to be done.

1. Mayank Agarwal
2. Tom Latham
3. Steve Smith (c)
4. Babar Azam
5. Ajinkya Rahane
6. Ben Stokes
7. BJ Watling (wk)
8. Pat Cummins
9. Mitchell Starc
10. Mohammed Shami
11. Josh Hazelwood

Steve Smith is batting at 4
 
Cricket Australia Announced Test X1 Of This Decade

Alastair Cook
David Warner
Kane Williamson
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli (c)
Ab de Villiers (wk)
Ben Stokes
Dale Steyn
Stuart Broad
Nathan Lyon
Jimmy Anderson

Kohli ~ only Asian in this XI

************************

Lyon and Warner selection is comedy.
 
Cricket Australia Announced Test X1 Of This Decade

Alastair Cook
David Warner
Kane Williamson
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli (c)
Ab de Villiers (wk)
Ben Stokes
Dale Steyn
Stuart Broad
Nathan Lyon
Jimmy Anderson

Kohli ~ only Asian in this XI

************************

Lyon and Warner selection is comedy.

CA bias on Lyon. He doesn't deserve after costing Australia the England series.
 
Cricket Australia Announced Test X1 Of This Decade

Alastair Cook
David Warner
Kane Williamson
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli (c)
Ab de Villiers (wk)
Ben Stokes
Dale Steyn
Stuart Broad
Nathan Lyon
Jimmy Anderson

Kohli ~ only Asian in this XI

************************

Lyon and Warner selection is comedy.

Agree that Warner is very suspicious, another bat like Amla, Root etc should be dropped down to open. If you don't want to do that however he is the best option.

Lyon vs Herath, Ashwin is interesting as he has been significantly more succesful outside Asia, while he is significantly less strong in Asia. Still, i feel Ashwin is a better selection, especially with his batting as the tail is quite weak.

ABdV as keeper is also strange, as he hasn't kept much this decade. If they are willing to make him keep, they should be willing to have a non-opener open. The obvious pure keeper selection otherwise is Watling.

My proposed team is either

Cook
Amla
Williamson
Smith
Kohli
ABdV
Stokes
Ashwin
Steyn
Broad
Anderson
, if players can be selected out of position

or

Cook
Warner
Williamson
Smith
Kohli
Stokes/ABdV (really struggling here)
Watling
Ashwin
Steyn
Broad
Anderson
,if player roles have to reflect their actual roles during this decade
 
Yes what about that? Scored 4 50s in 7 innings, good stuff but is it really test xi worthy? I am not sure.

Labuschagne scored runs in tricky conditions in England

Babar had relatively flat pitches to bat on. No doubt this had been babars year and he has emerged as a proper test batsman, but u can't leave labuschagne out, he has just been a bit better.

Maybe u can replace kohli with babar. As kohli has surprisingly not done as much in tests this year
 
Latham only scores against weak teams

Rory burns is much more deserving than Latham

Jadeja is an interesting selection
 
Mayank
Latham
Labu
Smith
Kohli
CdG
Watling
Cummins
Starc
Lyon
Shami/ Bumrah
 
Latham only scores against weak teams

Rory burns is much more deserving than Latham

Jadeja is an interesting selection

Burns averages 34 with 2 100s in 11 Tests... average of 39 against Aus, 43 against us and 42 against WI.

Latham has played 7 Tests this year with 3 100s, average of 43 against Eng, 77 against SL (in SL) and 82.5 against Bangladesh. Played only 1 Test against Aus.

No way does Burns deserve to be in there ahead of Latham in any instance.
 
Mayank Agarwal
Tom Latham
Marnus Labuschagne
Steven Smith
Babar Azam
Ben Stokes
Quinton de Qock
Mitchel Starc
Pat Cummins
Mohammad Shami
Nathan Lyon
 
Mayank
Latham
Labu
Smith
Kohli
CdG
Watling
Cummins
Starc
Lyon
Shami/ Bumrah


How does Kohli makes it in front of Babar Azam for example?

Tests:
Babar: 6 tests, 11 innings, 616 runs @68,44 with 3 hundreds, 3 fifties, SR - 72,30
Kohli : 8 tests, 11 innings, 612 runs @ 68,22 with 2 hundreds, 2 fifties, SR - 63,28

In Tests if we analyse both performances, Babar is ahead, Kohli failed in all 5 innings away from home and scored 2 hundreds at home against SA and Bangladesh. Babar was more consistent with 3 hundreds and 3 fifties, a hundreds at the gabba against Start, Hazlewood, Cummins and also a 97 there. Babar's much better SR also makes him more dominating.
 
Kohli gets into the world Test XI on his captaincy alone.

People are getting really desparate here over Babar. You could argue his place over Labuschagne not Kohli lol.
 
Mayank
Warner
Labu/Babar
Kohli
Smith
Watling
Stokes
Lyon
Cummins
Shami
Bumrah
 
Last edited:
Anyways , my team would be

Latham
Mayank
Smith
Kohli
Babar
Stokes
Watling
Cummins
Bumrah
Lyon
Shami
 
How does Kohli makes it in front of Babar Azam for example?

Tests:
Babar: 6 tests, 11 innings, 616 runs @68,44 with 3 hundreds, 3 fifties, SR - 72,30
Kohli : 8 tests, 11 innings, 612 runs @ 68,22 with 2 hundreds, 2 fifties, SR - 63,28

In Tests if we analyse both performances, Babar is ahead, Kohli failed in all 5 innings away from home and scored 2 hundreds at home against SA and Bangladesh. Babar was more consistent with 3 hundreds and 3 fifties, a hundreds at the gabba against Start, Hazlewood, Cummins and also a 97 there. Babar's much better SR also makes him more dominating.
Didn't look off numbers, just off what I remember and Kohli has been scoring runs for fun for years.

If Kohli played on the same pitches Babar has, he'd have more than 1,000 runs. He's the second best Test batsmen in the world.
 
Last edited:
Kohli has done pretty well at home this year but only 2 fifties (51, 76 ) in 5 innings away from home that's not good by his standard! But he would still make it to the test XI by his captaincy alone!
 
Didn't look off numbers, just off what I remember and Kohli has been scoring runs for fun for years.

If Kohli played on the same pitches Babar has, he'd have more than 1,000 runs. He's the second best Test batsmen in the world.

the pitches in Aus were dead.
In India, even more dead which is why he scored a 254.

Babar played in South Africa as well. That wasn't dead.

What "lively" pitches has Kohli played in this year??

Against BD? lol

Whatever he's scored before don't count for this XI. this is strictly for 2019.
 
the pitches in Aus were dead.
In India, even more dead which is why he scored a 254.

Babar played in South Africa as well. That wasn't dead.

What "lively" pitches has Kohli played in this year??

Against BD? lol

Whatever he's scored before don't count for this XI. this is strictly for 2019.
Yes and how many matches has Babar won Pakistan this year?
 
the pitches in Aus were dead.
In India, even more dead which is why he scored a 254.

Babar played in South Africa as well. That wasn't dead.

What "lively" pitches has Kohli played in this year??

Against BD? lol

Whatever he's scored before don't count for this XI. this is strictly for 2019.

Babar avg is same as kohli and kohli captained his team to a victory in aus, wi. How hard is it to understand.

Kohli is the captain of the number one team that alone gets him into the squad.
 
Babar avg is same as kohli and kohli captained his team to a victory in aus, wi. How hard is it to understand.

Kohli is the captain of the number one team that alone gets him into the squad.

I would drop Kaptaan from any team just because of his captaincy.
 
Labuschagne scored runs in tricky conditions in England

Babar had relatively flat pitches to bat on. No doubt this had been babars year and he has emerged as a proper test batsman, but u can't leave labuschagne out, he has just been a bit better.

Maybe u can replace kohli with babar. As kohli has surprisingly not done as much in tests this year

Babar can only play in the conditions he was given. He has scored in tricky conditions as well previously. I personally would count a century away and couple at home at a much higher strike rate which shows domination higher than Labu’s home centuries and only 50s overseas. Its just my opinion.
 
When you guys have nothing to say about his batting, you have to bring non factual things like captaincy.

There is always something to not accept things.

Babar Azam was a better batsman than Virat Kohli in Test match cricket in 2019.
Not by much, just a little.

Batting at 5, Babar's ability to score at a better rate is also more helpful.
 
When you guys have nothing to say about his batting, you have to bring non factual things like captaincy.

There is always something to not accept things.

Babar Azam was a better batsman than Virat Kohli in Test match cricket in 2019.
Not by much, just a little.

Batting at 5, Babar's ability to score at a better rate is also more helpful.

people picking their own XI. cant argue with anyone, you can pick your own team.
Add Babar and remove Kohli
 
Babar avg is same as kohli and kohli captained his team to a victory in aus, wi. How hard is it to understand.

Kohli is the captain of the number one team that alone gets him into the squad.

Is captaincy considered for this?

If so then Kohli makes it.
If it's not then he doesn't IMO.

How hard is THIS to understand?
 
When you guys have nothing to say about his batting, you have to bring non factual things like captaincy.

There is always something to not accept things.

Babar Azam was a better batsman than Virat Kohli in Test match cricket in 2019.
Not by much, just a little.

Batting at 5, Babar's ability to score at a better rate is also more helpful.
Babar is better just by a little margin which is not good enough to compensate for kohlis captaincy.
 
I would drop Kaptaan from any team just because of his captaincy.
In limited overs rohit should be the captain and i agree with u.

In tests kohli has transformed indian team and u of all should know this.

He has totally changed our outlook from a spin dependent team to a fast bowling team.

He is the GOAT Indian test captain.

Rise above hate jatt sahab.
 
In limited overs rohit should be the captain and i agree with u.

In tests kohli has transformed indian team and u of all should know this.

He has totally changed our outlook from a spin dependent team to a fast bowling team.

He is the GOAT Indian test captain.

Rise above hate jatt sahab.

I agree , 1 series win in eng/ nz will just seal it for everyone.
 
When you guys have nothing to say about his batting, you have to bring non factual things like captaincy.

There is always something to not accept things.

Babar Azam was a better batsman than Virat Kohli in Test match cricket in 2019.
Not by much, just a little.

Batting at 5, Babar's ability to score at a better rate is also more helpful.

How many games did Babar actually win for his team?
 
Kohli gets into the world Test XI on his captaincy alone.

People are getting really desparate here over Babar. You could argue his place over Labuschagne not Kohli lol.

Kohli has done pretty well at home this year but only 2 fifties (51, 76 ) in 5 innings away from home that's not good by his standard! But he would still make it to the test XI by his captaincy alone!

Babar is better just by a little margin which is not good enough to compensate for kohlis captaincy.

So now captaincy has become so important...
Strange never heard any of you guys put Ricky Ponting above Sachin Tendulkar because of his captaincy...
 
Burns averages 34 with 2 100s in 11 Tests... average of 39 against Aus, 43 against us and 42 against WI.

Latham has played 7 Tests this year with 3 100s, average of 43 against Eng, 77 against SL (in SL) and 82.5 against Bangladesh. Played only 1 Test against Aus.

No way does Burns deserve to be in there ahead of Latham in any instance.

Burns scored runs in tricky conditions in the the ashes.
Aus and windies are tougher than bang and Sri Lanka

Latham had a good series in Sri Lanka that makes him worthy.
 
Mayank Agarwal
Tom Latham
Marnus Labuschagne
Steven Smith
Virat Kohli (c)
BJ Watling
Ben Stokes
Ravi Jadeja
Pat Cummins
Jasprit Bumrah
Md. Shami
 
You're out: Warner, Starc overlooked in our 2019 Test team of the year - The Age

Ah, the joys of being a selector, and trying to squeeze cricket's best players into a 2019 world XI. About as much fun as facing Jofra Archer bowling down hill at Lord's. But this is no time to complain, there is work to be done.

In a year when the primary focus of many nations was on the World Cup, and there were few gold-plated Test series - one, of course, being the Ashes - it wasn't particularly easy to select a starting XI. There will be complaints - apologies to David Warner, Mitchell Starc, Kagiso Rabada, Tim Southee, Kemar Roach and Joe Root - but this is my best side for the final year of a decade that has given us plenty.

Mayank Agarwal (India)

8 Tests: 754 runs at 68.54. 3 centuries.

Had to bide his time before earning his first Test cap aged 27, at the MCG last summer, the hard-hitting opener from Bangalore had a year to remember. Having modelled his game on Virender Sehwag, his maiden Test ton, against South Africa at Visakhapatnam, morphed into a double century, while there was another century in the next Test, in Pune. If that wasn't enough, then came another double century, against Bangladesh at Indore. Has proven he is an all-formats operator, having debuted in the Indian Premier League in 2011. Test great Sunil Gavaskar has praised his balance and willingness to play straight.

Rohit Sharma (India)

5 Tests: 556 runs at 92.66. 3 centuries.

David Warner, a perennial pick, was certainly in the mix despite a terrible Ashes campaign for he resurrected his career against Pakistan. But Sharma's form upon returning to the Test XI was hard to resist. Dropped after struggling through two Tests in Australia last summer, the slick Sharma was recalled for the home series against the Proteas - and made an emphatic statement. There were centuries in each innings in Visakhapatnam and a double century at Ranchi.

Marnus Labuschagne (Australia)

11 Tests: 1104 runs at 64.94. 3 centuries.

One of cricket's feel-good stories of the year and the only man to crack 1000 Test runs. While his work ethic and commitment could not be faulted, it wasn't until he became the sport's first concussion substitute - replacing Steve Smith after he had been felled by a bouncer from Jofra Archer at Lord's - that the Queenslander became a household name. He grabbed the No.3 spot with an enthusiasm few have shown, and the runs flowed. Made runs in England when the team really needed them. Having tinkered with his technique to give himself a better chance of driving down the ground, Labuschagne became only the ninth Australian to enjoy three straight Test centuries, and his partnership with David Warner in Adelaide was a sight to behold.

Virat Kohli (captain, India)

8 Tests: 612 runs at 68. 2 centuries.

This hasn't been the most spectacular of years from the Indian master but he still finishes as the No.1 ranked batsman in the world despite being 13th on the Test run-scoring list. Joe Root and Babar Azam had claims but how can you go past Kohli? There was an unbeaten double century against South Africa in Pune and a dashing 136 against Bangladesh in India's maiden day-night Test at Kolkata. Kane Williamson was, as always, also under strong consideration but his poor form in Australia counted against the New Zealand captain.

Steve Smith (Australia)

8 Tests: 965 runs at 74.23. 3 centuries.

This was never going to be an easy year for the former skipper, returning from a 12-month ban, and having to do this before hostile English crowds. After a modest World Cup, Smith again had the 'best-since-Bradman' tag bestowed upon him, such was his imperious Ashes series. For the second-straight series against England, he averaged more than 100 (110) in a series aggregate of 774. England had no idea how to get him out and he was by far the best of the touring batsmen. The Test he did miss, at Headingley, the home side won. His greatness was reinforced in becoming the quickest man to 7000 Test runs. He was also the second leading Test run scorer this year. "He is just a genius and I never had any doubt he would come back and be the player he was," Australian skipper Tim Paine said. While his form at home this summer has slipped against a barrage of short balls, it did not matter come World XI selection, for the Ashes was the heavy-duty battle of the year.

Ben Stokes (England)

11 Tests: 821 runs at 45.61. 2 centuries.

22 wickets at 35.45.

Provides an on-field flair the sport desperately needs. Is the world's premier all-rounder who has the knack of turning a game, whether with bat or ball. England's World Cup hero delivered one of the greatest Ashes innings with his unbeaten 135 dragging the home side to a stunning one-wicket victory at Headingley, having had to chase down 359 to win. Only nine teams in 142 years had chased more. He was also man-of-the-match for his century in the drawn Lord's Test. Finished the Ashes with 441 runs at 55.12 and eight wickets at 45.

BJ Watling (New Zealand)

8 Tests: 559 runs at 55.9. 2 centuries.

It was hard to nudge South African gloveman Quinton de Kock, for he sat ninth in Test runs scored, but Watling had a standout year behind the stumps and with the bat. He is the highest ranked batsman of all wicketkeepers, having enjoyed an unbeaten 105 against Sri Lanka in Galle and a double-century against England at Mount Maunganui. He is only the ninth wicketkeeper to have notched a Test double-century. Avoids getting into on-field spats with opponents. Test great Adam Gilchrist rates the South-African born Watling as the best in 2019. “People are stunned by that. Who’s heard of BJ Watling, a lot of people say. But, statistically, and the way he is playing, the current form – having just completed his first double-century in Test cricket, and now the record dismissals for New Zealand in Test cricket, he is the complete package.”

Pat Cummins (vice-captain, Australia)

12 Tests: 59 wickets at 20.13. 2 5-wicket hauls, 1 10-wicket haul.

The reigning Allan Border medallist has been the leading wicket-taker in Test cricket this year by a good stretch. Like Smith, was at his best in England, claiming 29 wickets at 19.62, although he missed out on a five-for. Cummins speed, accuracy and ability to extract something from the new or old ball, often in a subtle way, no matter what the conditions make him special. His three wickets on day one of the first Test against Pakistan at the Gabba were crucial to the home side taking charge. Now a vice-captain, Cummins says there is no reason why a fast bowler cannot also captain his country.

Nathan Lyon (Australia)

12 Tests: 45 wickets at 33.26. 2 five-wicket hauls.

Had little competition this year. Retains his reputation as the world's premier spinner in a year when he vaulted into third spot on Australia's all-time Test wicket-taking list, passing Dennis Lillee and now behind only Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath. Claimed 20 wickets at 33.4 through the Ashes, although he was quiet after bowling the visitors to victory at Edgbaston. Will be remembered for the the missed run out in the Headingley classic but it did not cost his team the Ashes. Bowled Australia to victory against Pakistan in Adelaide.

Stuart Broad (England)

11 Tests: 43 wickets at 25.11. 1 five-wicket haul.

The veteran quick had an Ashes series to remember, claiming 23 wickets at 26.65. Tormented Australia's left-handers, particularly David Warner, whom he dismissed seven times. An ability to go around the wicket and then have a ball straighten or nip away to Warner proved to be a masterstroke. Accepted the challenge to lead the attack when long-term opening partner James Anderson succumbed to injury. Claimed only four wickets in two Tests in New Zealand but gets bonus points for the Ashes. His pace and guile are an important component of any attack.

Neil Wagner (New Zealand)

6 Tests: 43 wickets at 17.81. 4 five-wicket hauls.

This was a very tough call, for Mohammed Shami and Mitchell Starc (42 wickets at 20.71 in eight Tests) were also firmly in calculations. Starc has been superb since the Ashes, with only Brett Lee (32.89) having a better strike rate of any Australian bowler in a calendar year of the past 30 years, but it was hard to go past Wagner. That his 43 wickets came in only six Tests - that's right, only six - was startling. This included 13 wickets at 19.84 in two Tests against England and 14 at 20.28 in two Tests against Australia. He gets bonus points for being the only man in recent years to frustrate Steve Smith, who has struggled to handle the left-armer's short-pitched attack. Having variety in an attack is a must, and Wagner - while far from being an express quick - provides that.

12th man: Mohammed Shami (India)

8 Tests: 33 wickets at 16.66. 1 five-wicket haul.

South African Kagiso Rabada is arguably the best fast bowler in world cricket but he appeared over-worked in 2019. India has their best fast-bowling brigade in history and Shami has been the main man, particularly with Jasprit Bumrah nursing a back stress fracture. Claimed nine wickets in two Tests in the Caribbean, 13 in three at home against South Africa and nine at home against Bangladesh. His four second-innings wickets to knock over Bangladesh in Indore prompted Dale Steyn to declare he was the best quick in the world based on current form. Is masterful with the new and old ball, where his wrist and seam position and ability to swing the ball in with a flick of his index finger has made him an all-purpose threat.
 
Warner had one gigantic series against one team. Didn't realize Broad had a very good year. I thought Starc atleast had 2 good test series. Surprising not a single Indian fast bowler who all average in their teens. Bumrah 13, Umesh 13, Ishant 15, Shami 16 average. Not sure how none of them could find a place there.
 
Not a Pakistani in sight.....never thought I would see the day.
 
Not a Pakistani in sight.....never thought I would see the day.

We only played 6 tests this year and 4 of them were in SA/Aus (miserable performances) and 1 was almost rained out (at home). I'm worried more about lack of cricket especially test matches than these fantasy XIs.
 
Warner
Tom Latham
Labuschagne
Kohli
Smith
QDK (WK)
Ashwin
Cummins
Hazelwood
Jofra archer
Philander
 
Mayank
Latham
Labuschagne
Smith
Kohli
Babbar
Stokes
Lyon
Cummins
Bumrah
Shami
 
Mayank
Latham
Labuschagne
Smith
Kohli
Babbar
Stokes
Lyon
Cummins
Bumrah
Shami

No way Bumrah should be there,he played only 3 test matches this year, I will pick Wagner.
Instead of Latham I will pick Rory Burns.
 
Last edited:
No way Bumrah should be there,he played only 3 test matches this year, I will pick Wagner.

It doesn't really matter. 3 tests is a small sample set but his performances in those tests were amazing. Never rated Wagner.
 
It doesn't really matter. 3 tests is a small sample set but his performances in those tests were amazing. Never rated Wagner.

It matters if you are considering 2019,if he had played more test matches I would have put him in xi,Wagner took 43 wickets in just 6 matches in this year that is hell of a performance.
 
It's about 2019.
And I already posted that I feel he had a slightly better year that Kohli in 2019 in test cricket.

He should make it in front of him but media hype can't be ignored.
 
It's about 2019.
And I already posted that I feel he had a slightly better year than Kohli in 2019 in test cricket.

He should make it in front of him but media hype can't be ignored.

Slightly? lol,There are many guys that outperformed him in Tests, ODIs, T20s separately. Rohit probably outdid him in all 3 formats. Not sure about T20. But KL Rahul would have done better than him. ONly reason he is being talked up because he gets to play in all 3 formats. Not everyone else.
 
not really no. In terms of ability ? no way. stats isn't everything.

Its a team of the best performing players in 2019. Wagner has the 2nd most wickets for a seamer in just 6 tests.

Its a pretty obvious 2nd choice after Cummins.
 
Going to be honest here. If i were a Pak fan i would gloat probably about his ODI record. Definitely not the other format. Especially in Tests where he bashed SL in an inconsequential scenario atleast twice. There is nothing earth shattering he has done in this year. He has evolved. That's about it. if you think this is some sort of ATG stuff i have to say your expectation level is very low probbaly because Pakistan hasn't produced that many great batsmen in a long time. Smith, Labu can gloat this year. Rohit, Rahane, Stokes, Watling to some extent. Rest not so much in Tests.
 
Last edited:
Going to be honest here. If i were a Pak fan i would gloat probably about his ODI record. Definitely not the other format. Especially in Tests where he bashed SL in an inconsequential scenario atleast twice. There is nothing earth shattering he has done in this year. He has evolved. That's about it. if you think this is some sort of ATG stuff i have to say your expectation level is very low probbaly because Pakistan hasn't produced that many great batsmen in a long time. Smith, Labu can gloat this year. Rohit, Rahane, Stokes, Watling to some extent. Rest not so much in Tests.

rohit also scored runs at home, nothing much to gloat about for him
babar atleast scored a ton and 97 on foreign soil

scored a winning 100 in a world cup match against new zealand on a green top. 70 odd against steyn and co in south africa. these are excpetional acheivements for a pak batsmen,

pak won't play many tests this year, so 2019 was the only opportunity babar had to be successful.

babar now has affirmed his talent, teams are alot more vary of him
 
We only played 6 tests this year and 4 of them were in SA/Aus (miserable performances) and 1 was almost rained out (at home). I'm worried more about lack of cricket especially test matches than these fantasy XIs.

Still better than what Sachin had to go through in the 90s.

1994 - 7 tests
1995 - 3 tests
1998 - 5 tests (his peak year)
 
Still better than what Sachin had to go through in the 90s.

1994 - 7 tests
1995 - 3 tests
1998 - 5 tests (his peak year)

Unbelievable!!

In the period Jan 1994 - Dec 1998 Pakistan played 44 tests compared to India's 35. For comparison England played 60 and Australia 54.

Pakistan and India didn't play each other as well so that didn't help either.
 
Unbelievable!!

In the period Jan 1994 - Dec 1998 Pakistan played 44 tests compared to India's 35. For comparison England played 60 and Australia 54.

Pakistan and India didn't play each other as well so that didn't help either.

wasn't it because india were lions at home but cats away?
India din't lose a home series in the 90s. but they lost to australia 3 0, pretty sure they lost to south africa 1 or 2 -0.

Dint play pakistan much. I don't think they even beat Sri Lanka away in 90s.
 
wasn't it because india were lions at home but cats away?
India din't lose a home series in the 90s. but they lost to australia 3 0, pretty sure they lost to south africa 1 or 2 -0.

Dint play pakistan much. I don't think they even beat Sri Lanka away in 90s.

Not like that Generally in the 90s One dayers started gainng ascendancy Not many tests were scheduled for whtaever reason despite SA becoming a regular test nation. We played appallingly low number of Tests. Between 1992 and 1999 no tour to Australia. Australia played 4 tests in India in between England toured us just once in the entire 1990s. Tendulkar's very best form went unused due to shceduling. He was able to make up somewhat post 2000. But 1990s Tendulkar was a different beast.
 
Not like that Generally in the 90s One dayers started gainng ascendancy Not many tests were scheduled for whtaever reason despite SA becoming a regular test nation. We played appallingly low number of Tests. Between 1992 and 1999 no tour to Australia. Australia played 4 tests in India in between England toured us just once in the entire 1990s. Tendulkar's very best form went unused due to shceduling. He was able to make up somewhat post 2000. But 1990s Tendulkar was a different beast.

oh ok. fair enough. That's a shame.
 
wasn't it because india were lions at home but cats away?
India din't lose a home series in the 90s. but they lost to australia 3 0, pretty sure they lost to south africa 1 or 2 -0.

Dint play pakistan much. I don't think they even beat Sri Lanka away in 90s.

India didn’t play Pakistan away in 90s but lost the home series 2-1 in 99.
 
Back
Top