[PICTURE] Out, or not-out? That is the question!

[MenInG]

We received an interesting picture from a game of tennis-ball cricket in which the middle-stump has fallen over, but the bails stayed put.

Middle stump is down, but the bails stay put! Middle stump is down, but the bails stay put!
The fan asked if it was a genuine dismissal, so we looked up the laws.

29.1.1. The wicket is put down if a bail is completely removed from the top of the stumps, or a stump is struck out of the ground

Though the bails remain undisturbed, the batsman is OUT.

Tough luck to him!


https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1112873

 

[MenInG]

Wonder if this will ever happen Or is this a very desi thing?

 

[ARK Rafay]

Wonder if this will ever happen Or is this a very desi thing?

It is the 1st time I've seen something like this. So I guess this is very very rare

 

[happydavy]

Though the bails remain undisturbed, the batsman is OUT.

Tough luck to him!

Tough luck? The guy lost his middle stump!

How much more good luck does he need that even after losing his middle stump, his dismissal needed outside intervention to establish that he's out.

 

[Bhaijaan]

Gravity defying bails save the day for a lucky batsman.

 

[thelandofthebravepeople]

It looks like one bail and not bails.

 

[Naim]

It looks like one bail and not bails.

Yep you are right. Because in my childhood i also played with these type of bail/bails.

 

[Madplayer]

I remember a similar case when i was playing cricket once. We were using branches of trees as stumps. When i was batting, the ball passed between two stumps (i guess they were placed a bit too far away from each other). The "bails" didnt dislodge obviously. Everybody knew i was bowled but i was adjudged not out

 

[Junaid_ahmed]

I remember a similar case when i was playing cricket once. We were using branches of trees as stumps. When i was batting, the ball passed between two stumps (i guess they were placed a bit too far away from each other). The "bails" didnt dislodge obviously. Everybody knew i was bowled but i was adjudged not out

Lol you must have played with Sundaram Ravi as umpire.

 

[cricketworm]

We received an interesting picture from a game of tennis-ball cricket in which the middle-stump has fallen over, but the bails stayed put.

Middle stump is down, but the bails stay put! Middle stump is down, but the bails stay put!
The fan asked if it was a genuine dismissal, so we looked up the laws.

29.1.1. The wicket is put down if a bail is completely removed from the top of the stumps, or a stump is struck out of the ground

Though the bails remain undisturbed, the batsman is OUT.

Tough luck to him!


https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1112873

Yup

 

[Madplayer]

Lol you must have played with Sundaram Ravi as umpire.

to be fair to him, everyone was confused, not just him

 

[Madplayer]

Yup

Nobody read that lol

 

[cricketworm]

I remember a similar case when i was playing cricket once. We were using branches of trees as stumps. When i was batting, the ball passed between two stumps (i guess they were placed a bit too far away from each other). The "bails" didnt dislodge obviously. Everybody knew i was bowled but i was adjudged not out

Gully rules should have been applied here not the ICC rules, as you didn't follow ICC guidlines for the stump then why were you following ICC rules. Consistancy in rules is what we are fighting for you see.

 

[a_tahir]

Someone show the icc tweet about this