What's new

[PICTURES/VIDEOS] A case for Sharjeel Khan: no sense to keep him out of the side

Destroyed 2 times World Champion Samuel Badree. One time World Champion Jasprit Bumrah will be a baby bowler for him.
 
Dont know why he went down the hill. I know he was banned but I would have rocked the world if I had his abilities.
 
Well he is a good batsman but at this stage of his career he can't give stellar performances regularly for the team.
 
gazza619 said:
Dont know why he went down the hill. I know he was banned but I would have rocked the world if I had his abilities.
Click to expand...
You still need to be able to understand modern cricket, which I don’t think you do.
 
Sharjeel Khan, the guy who had utterly mediocre numbers even at his peak is going to comeback and somehow be good.

Some of you guys are way to optimistic. LOL.
 
LOL he looks worse than the players who have been retired for years.

Anyway I don't think even Pakistan are dumb enough to select him. He's absolutely awful...egregious fitness...zero strike rotation...complete leg-side hack. Could have been great like 8 years ago in 2016. That's when he was really starting to come into his own. But he burned it all away by becoming a match-fixer and was never the same when he came back. He dug his own grave.
 
Sharjeel is history. There is no way he is coming back in the side. People are crying for no reason to bring him back bring him back. He cannot and he won't... PCB is not that pathetic.
 
RedwoodOriginal said:
LOL he looks worse than the players who have been retired for years.

Anyway I don't think even Pakistan are dumb enough to select him. He's absolutely awful...egregious fitness...zero strike rotation...complete leg-side hack. Could have been great like 8 years ago in 2016. That's when he was really starting to come into his own. But he burned it all away by becoming a match-fixer and was never the same when he came back. He dug his own grave.
Click to expand...
Misbah at 50 years old still look better than many finishers in Pakistan
 
Thank God Misbah isn’t the captain of the Champion’s side otherwise he would make Sohaib Maqsood and Younis Khan open with Sharjeel coming in at 4

The biggest useless white ball cricket mind in Pakistan history: Misbah ul Haq
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rana said:
Thank God Misbah isn’t the captain of the Champion’s side otherwise he would make Sohaib Maqsood and Younis Khan open with Sharjeel coming in at 4

The biggest useless white ball cricket mind in Pakistan history: Misbah ul Haq
Click to expand...
Bro, you said the exact words I said a few days ago without even being aware of what I said? Zindabad buddy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Deewana Mastana said:
He's semi retired that's why he's got picked in the Champions league going on in Birmingham with the likes of Misbah, YK and Afridi.

The guy doesn't even get gigs in LPL of all leagues and you guys are crying over him to get into the PAK side....Geez!!!
Click to expand...
The guy doesn’t get a PSL gig, but openers like Rizwan, Babar and Shan Masood do…and these types of openers are also captains of PSL franchises. Think about it, just how far Pakistan cricket and its fans have fallen. This is your level of excellence, openers like the ones who are captaining PSL franchises. Then, it is you people who cry about the national team and why it is incapable of competing with the top teams of the world, because of how far away you are from their style of play.

Ponder. Reflect. Scrutinise. Wake up.

Otherwise, U S A. U S A.
 
Deewana Mastana said:
He's semi retired that's why he's got picked in the Champions league going on in Birmingham with the likes of Misbah, YK and Afridi.

The guy doesn't even get gigs in LPL of all leagues and you guys are crying over him to get into the PAK side....Geez!!!
Click to expand...
The structure of Pak Champions is infinitely superior to pakistan's current team.

Genuinely speaking, our current team should be playing Champions league while the champions team should be playing international.

YK has consistently shown why he was the best captain post 2000, As soon as afridi and malik were getting tonked, he came up to both of them and told them to bowl short pitch and slow and as soon as they did they got wickets. He also set the field according to his bowlers, Meanwhile babar just says shabash shabash 24/7 while having chacha be the slip.

Secondly the structure is perfect, 3 aggressive openers who utilise the PP, followed by a very strong MO of Malik, YK and Misbah followed by Afridi and Razzaq as your finishers.

The structure of the current team is have 2 non PP openers at the top who think t20 is test cricket, Have your tail start at no 3. And try your level best to protect shadab by not playing abrar.

And you're honestly telling me Sharjeel doesn't find a place in a squad where shadab khan a tail ender is your no 5?
 
Sharjeel Khan dismissal from Brett Lee is akin to showing a person right hand and slapping him with left hand.

Enough of this Bs that Bring Sharjeel back or he deserves selection in national team, Sharjeel is a badly mediocre player who should be no way near the national team
 
Kianig89 said:
Sharjeel Khan dismissal from Brett Lee is akin to showing a person right hand and slapping him with left hand.

Enough of this Bs that Bring Sharjeel back or he deserves selection in national team, Sharjeel is a badly mediocre player who should be no way near the national team
Click to expand...
But what about 40 off 40 v USA?
 
Rana said:
But what about 40 off 40 v USA?
Click to expand...
Sharjeel Khan has already given us enough sample.size at international level to gauge his abilities . Thank you Sir! Your services no more required. SIND premier league is your level
 
Kianig89 said:
Sharjeel Khan has already given us enough sample.size at international level to gauge his abilities . Thank you Sir! Your services no more required. SIND premier league is your level
Click to expand...
So, is that Babar and Rizwan’s level too or you are conveniently going to be biased?
 
Rana said:
So, is that Babar and Rizwan’s level too or you are conveniently going to be biased?
Click to expand...
Whatever Babar and Rizwan are still better players than Sharjeel Khan it's just their lust for opening is not right
 
Kianig89 said:
Whatever Babar and Rizwan are still better players than Sharjeel Khan it's just their lust for opening is not right
Click to expand...
In t20? Or overall?

Babar I can understand since he's technically more correct and will perform more in ODIs. It'll be similar to the Fakhar Zaman vs Misbah debate, Fakhar is 100x more impactful but Misbah is more consistent.

But why rizwan? Rizwan in t20 desperately needed a respite from Misbah to ever function. He has zero good innings against proper sides in t20?

In odi he has 1 good performance against sri lanka, The bashing sharjeel did against australia in their home den and his Ireland butchering is > Rizwan and his capabilities especially after we already saw how rizzu performed against Ireland lol.
 
Wahab said in his report that fitness was poor, so PCB will recall Sharjeel- a specimen so fit, that even CR7 is embarrassed
 
Sharjeel should be outscoring likes of Malik etc in this tournament - especially given boundary sizes etc.
 
mominsaigol said:
In t20? Or overall?

Babar I can understand since he's technically more correct and will perform more in ODIs. It'll be similar to the Fakhar Zaman vs Misbah debate, Fakhar is 100x more impactful but Misbah is more consistent.

But why rizwan? Rizwan in t20 desperately needed a respite from Misbah to ever function. He has zero good innings against proper sides in t20?

In odi he has 1 good performance against sri lanka, The bashing sharjeel did against australia in their home den and his Ireland butchering is > Rizwan and his capabilities especially after we already saw how rizzu performed against Ireland lol.
Click to expand...
Rizwan has more match winning innings in t20i than sharjeel.
 
Hyder said:
Rizwan has more match winning innings in t20i than sharjeel.
Click to expand...
No one cares about his innings in t20 against b string and c string sides.

In recent times the hype for tours has gone down the drain. Unless a player does something revolutionary in a series such as fakhar scoring his 200 or 193 against sa or 180 against NZ then no one cares.

Even then people remember fakhar for his ct 2017 final and his 60 ball 100 against MZ chasing 400 in wc the more.

Rizwan has done nothing revolutionary in t20 that warrants attention, and in tournaments his best innings is the 10 wicket game against india. Otherwise he's botched more tournaments then won them, Asia cup 2022 final being the key metric.
 
mominsaigol said:
In t20? Or overall?

Babar I can understand since he's technically more correct and will perform more in ODIs. It'll be similar to the Fakhar Zaman vs Misbah debate, Fakhar is 100x more impactful but Misbah is more consistent.

But why rizwan? Rizwan in t20 desperately needed a respite from Misbah to ever function. He has zero good innings against proper sides in t20?

In odi he has 1 good performance against sri lanka, The bashing sharjeel did against australia in their home den and his Ireland butchering is > Rizwan and his capabilities especially after we already saw how rizzu performed against Ireland lol.
Click to expand...
So you want Sharjeel to do wicket keeping as Rizwan replacement,
 
Kianig89 said:
Sharjeel is a specialist batsman where as Rizwan is also a wicketkeeper, therefore the expectation from Sharjeel as an opener should be higher than Rizwan as an opener
Click to expand...
So Rizwan is allowed to be a below international standard T20 opener because he is a keeper?
 
Rana said:
So Rizwan is allowed to be a below international standard T20 opener because he is a keeper?
Click to expand...
The depths for the love of Sharjeel Khan is unreal, Sharjeel as a specialist opener has a SR of 133 in T20 Whereas Rizwan being a keeper has SR of 126.

If Rizwan plays at no. 4 or 5 all the debate will end, whereas Sharjeel with these numbers will still remain a failure and a tainted player
 
Kianig89 said:
The depths for the love of Sharjeel Khan is unreal, Sharjeel as a specialist opener has a SR of 133 in T20 Whereas Rizwan being a keeper has SR of 126.

If Rizwan plays at no. 4 or 5 all the debate will end, whereas Sharjeel with these numbers will still remain a failure and a tainted player
Click to expand...
Let’s see if happen first.

Sharjeel>>>Babar and Rizwan as T20 openers

Let’s see this happen. And then Babar batting at 3, Rizwan at 4 or 5. And don’t talk about ‘depths of love’ especially having blundered with your justification of Rizwan’s pathetic T20 approach as an opener because he is a keeper.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kianig89 said:
Sharjeel is a specialist batsman where as Rizwan is also a wicketkeeper, therefore the expectation from Sharjeel as an opener should be higher than Rizwan as an opener
Click to expand...
Kianig89 said:
The depths for the love of Sharjeel Khan is unreal, Sharjeel as a specialist opener has a SR of 133 in T20 Whereas Rizwan being a keeper has SR of 126.

If Rizwan plays at no. 4 or 5 all the debate will end, whereas Sharjeel with these numbers will still remain a failure and a tainted player
Click to expand...
You realise rizwan at no 4 and no 5 was terrible for years since his 2015 debut in t20? It was in 2020 when he was given a respite by Misbah due to SNGPL.

Also wdym by higher expectations? So what were your expectations of sarfraz?

Does the planet look at Jos Butler and Quinton de kock and say, Yeah we should replace Butler with Alaistair cook and Quinton with bavuma, But we won't because they are keepers so let's lower our expectation?
 
mominsaigol said:
You realise rizwan at no 4 and no 5 was terrible for years since his 2015 debut in t20? It was in 2020 when he was given a respite by Misbah due to SNGPL.

Also wdym by higher expectations? So what were your expectations of sarfraz?

Does the planet look at Jos Butler and Quinton de kock and say, Yeah we should replace Butler with Alaistair cook and Quinton with bavuma, But we won't because they are keepers so let's lower our expectation?
Click to expand...
Cricket is not played on forums and keyboards whenever a team is made, certain players with their strength and weakness are selected to maximise the overall output, at present Rizwan fits in Pakistan team though batting order is debatable.

Whatever flaws Rizwan has will not make Sharjeel Khan a better player , rather Sharjeel got a chance to represent Pakistan in 20+ T20s yet he failed to Cement his position
 
Rana said:
Let’s see if happen first.

Sharjeel>>>Babar and Rizwan as T20 openers

Let’s see this happen. And then Babar batting at 3, Rizwan at 4 or 5. Put your money where your mouth is. And don’t talk about ‘depths of love’ especially having blundered with your justification of Rizwan’s pathetic T20 approach as an opener because he is a keeper.
Click to expand...
On what criteria is Sharjeel better than RizBar as opener
 
Kianig89 said:
Cricket is not played on forums and keyboards whenever a team is made, certain players with their strength and weakness are selected to maximise the overall output, at present Rizwan fits in Pakistan team though batting order is debatable.

Whatever flaws Rizwan has will not make Sharjeel Khan a better player , rather Sharjeel got a chance to represent Pakistan in 20+ T20s yet he failed to Cement his position
Click to expand...
So shadab khan at no 5 is their to maximise pakistan's output?

Abrar not being played is to maximise pakistan's output?
 
Kianig89 said:
Dream on ! Only in video games Sharjeel will play for Pakistan
Click to expand...
I know, and on the same video games can you use Rizwan and Babar to set up a score of 220 against England, Australia, India and South Africa. And you can maybe push it to 240 against Sri Lanka, Bangladesh. You can go for 260 against USA, Ireland and Scotland. In video games, you can ensure Babar’s XI isn’t 10 runs short
 
mominsaigol said:
So shadab khan at no 5 is their to maximise pakistan's output?

Abrar not being played is to maximise pakistan's output?
Click to expand...
Nobody is talking about Shadab and Abrar, only the pathetic performances of Sharjeel Khan for Pakistan team are being analysed
mominsaigol said:
So shadab khan at no 5 is their to maximise pakistan's output?

Abrar not being played is to maximise pakistan's output?
Click to expand...
 
Kianig89 said:
Nobody is talking about Shadab and Abrar, only the pathetic performances of Sharjeel Khan for Pakistan team are being analysed
Click to expand...
You talked about pakistan maximising output, So I'm asking you how exactly are they maximising output via the decisons they are making.
 
Kianig89 said:
Nobody is talking about Shadab and Abrar, only the pathetic performances of Sharjeel Khan for Pakistan team are being analysed
Click to expand...
He has a valid point. You people love to single Sharjeel, Fakhar, Saim, Azam etc for their roles whilst overlooking the complete nonsense upon which this team is based upon.

Answer his question. Stop deflecting!
 
Rana said:
I know, and on the same video games can you use Rizwan and Babar to set up a score of 220 against England, Australia, India and South Africa. And you can maybe push it to 240 against Sri Lanka, Bangladesh. You can go for 260 against USA, Ireland and Scotland. In video games, you can ensure Babar’s XI isn’t 10 runs short
Click to expand...
RizBar have some number.of years left in international cricket unlike Sharjeel Khan
 
Rana said:
I know, and on the same video games can you use Rizwan and Babar to set up a score of 220 against England, Australia, India and South Africa. And you can maybe push it to 240 against Sri Lanka, Bangladesh. You can go for 260 against USA, Ireland and Scotland. In video games, you can ensure Babar’s XI isn’t 10 runs short
Click to expand...
Have him play the game on Hardest difficulty with physics being set at hardest he'll get bowled out for 10.

Kushi kushi controller pakrei ga, Or ghusei sei apna tv torei ga.
 
mominsaigol said:
You talked about pakistan maximising output, So I'm asking you how exactly are they maximising output via the decisons they are making.
Click to expand...
I'm talking about Rizwan being in the team not the overall selection of team hold your horses
 
Kianig89 said:
RizBar have some number.of years left in international cricket unlike Sharjeel Khan
Click to expand...
So we carry on with a pathetic approach to this game because those two curses are 30 and have some years left??!!!
 
Rana said:
So we carry on with a pathetic approach to this game because those two curses are 30 and have some years left??!!!
Click to expand...
Hope for the best, Rizwan has some spark to turn the tables unlike Sharjeel Khan
 
Kianig89 said:
Hope for the best, Rizwan has some spark to turn the tables unlike Sharjeel Khan
Click to expand...
I’ve said since 2019 ‘HE HAS NO SPARK’. I’ve been right since

I’ll say it again, I’ll be right again. Your failure as a cricketing nation is imminent with this man at the helm of it.
 
Kianig89 said:
I'm talking about Rizwan being in the team not the overall selection of team hold your horses
Click to expand...
No your words were Cricket is not played on forums and keyboards whenever a team is made, certain players with their strength and weakness are selected to maximise the overall output, at present Rizwan fits in Pakistan team though batting order is debatable.

You clearly stated Certain players with their strengths and weaknesses are selected to maximize output.

Who are the certain players in pakistan that play every game and have title cards. I'll give you the answer.

1) Babar and rizwan (Play every game at positions 1 to 3)

2) Shadab (Plays every game at position 5)

3) Chacha (plays every game at position 6/7)

4) Fakhar (Plays every game at position 4)

5) Shaheen, Naseem and rauf( Main trio that Play majority)

^^ Now from this list kindly justify how pakistan is maximising its output qith shadab at 5, Chacha at 6, fakhar at 4, Babar and rizwan at 1 to 3.

Please back up your claims
 
mominsaigol said:
No your words were Cricket is not played on forums and keyboards whenever a team is made, certain players with their strength and weakness are selected to maximise the overall output, at present Rizwan fits in Pakistan team though batting order is debatable.

You clearly stated Certain players with their strengths and weaknesses are selected to maximize output.

Who are the certain players in pakistan that play every game and have title cards. I'll give you the answer.

1) Babar and rizwan (Play every game at positions 1 to 3)

2) Shadab (Plays every game at position 5)

3) Chacha (plays every game at position 6/7)

4) Fakhar (Plays every game at position 4)

5) Shaheen, Naseem and rauf( Main trio that Play majority)

^^ Now from this list kindly justify how pakistan is maximising its output qith shadab at 5, Chacha at 6, fakhar at 4, Babar and rizwan at 1 to 3.

Please back up your claims
Click to expand...
Khich ke rakh. This guy deserves this humiliation having jumped into this discussion with his arrogant stance
 
mominsaigol said:
No your words were Cricket is not played on forums and keyboards whenever a team is made, certain players with their strength and weakness are selected to maximise the overall output, at present Rizwan fits in Pakistan team though batting order is debatable.

You clearly stated Certain players with their strengths and weaknesses are selected to maximize output.

Who are the certain players in pakistan that play every game and have title cards. I'll give you the answer.

1) Babar and rizwan (Play every game at positions 1 to 3)

2) Shadab (Plays every game at position 5)

3) Chacha (plays every game at position 6/7)

4) Fakhar (Plays every game at position 4)

5) Shaheen, Naseem and rauf( Main trio that Play majority)

^^ Now from this list kindly justify how pakistan is maximising its output qith shadab at 5, Chacha at 6, fakhar at 4, Babar and rizwan at 1 to 3.

Please back up your claims
Click to expand...
Rizwan justifies his place in the team regardless of your analogies but the sad thing is Sharjeel Khan even in mid 30s failed to establish himself as an international player and now stop this rona Dhona, nobody has defended or tried to defend Shadab Iftikhar and others the debate being is about Sharjeel Khan' s failure rather than trying to portray him as the next messiah or reincarnation of Matthew Hayden
 
Kianig89 said:
Rizwan justifies his place in the team regardless of your analogies but the sad thing is Sharjeel Khan even in mid 30s failed to establish himself as an international player and now stop this rona Dhona, nobody has defended or tried to defend Shadab Iftikhar and others the debate being is about Sharjeel Khan' s failure rather than trying to portray him as the next messiah or reincarnation of Matthew Hayden
Click to expand...
Let me try this in a different language.

Tum nei Kha Tha kei

Cricket is not played on forums and keyboards whenever a team is made, certain players with their strength and weakness are selected to maximise the overall output, at present Rizwan fits in Pakistan team though batting order is debatable.

Abh wo Players Babar aur rizwan (no 1 to no 3), Fakhar (no 4), Shadab (no 5) aur Chacha (no 7) hain.

Abh Mere dost Mujhe batao kei team Pakistan apna output kesei maximize kar li hai is Combination kei sath?
 
mominsaigol said:
Let me try this in a different language.

Tum nei Kha Tha kei

Cricket is not played on forums and keyboards whenever a team is made, certain players with their strength and weakness are selected to maximise the overall output, at present Rizwan fits in Pakistan team though batting order is debatable.

Abh wo Players Babar aur rizwan (no 1 to no 3), Fakhar (no 4), Shadab (no 5) aur Chacha (no 7) hain.

Abh Mere dost Mujhe batao kei team Pakistan apna output kesei maximize kar li hai is Combination kei sath?
Click to expand...
I cannot help you , Rizwan fits into Pakistan team long story short , rest of the players they are responsible for their performance or the team management is accountable for this,
 
Kianig89 said:
I cannot help you , Rizwan fits into Pakistan team long story short , rest of the players they are responsible for their performance or the team management is accountable for this,
Click to expand...
So are you saying you cannot answer the premise that you yourself claimed?
 
Rana said:
How?!!???
Click to expand...
Cause he's a keeper, so we must lower our expectations.

That's why Quinton was selected in place of bavuma, Every one knows Bavuma should be selected over Quinton but he was dropped because the standards were too high for bavuma but too low for quinton.
 
mominsaigol said:
So are you saying you cannot answer the premise that you yourself claimed?
Click to expand...
Rizwan is maximising the team output unlike others , team management failed in their decision of selecting other players what if Rizwan was dropped the replacement Azam was even worst . Simple as that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ads101
Was it right to keep Sharjeel Khan out of the Champions One-day Cup 2024?
Replies
14
Views
450
mominsaigol
mominsaigol
BouncerGuy
  • Poll
Should players who skip the Champions One-Day Cup no longer be considered for International selection?
Replies
36
Views
1K
Cricket Warrior
C
mominsaigol
[PICTURES/VIDEOS] What now for Babar Azam?
7 8 9
Replies
670
Views
46K
MenInG
MenInG
M
[PICTURES/VIDEOS] How happy are you with the return of cricket to Faisalabad for the Champions One-Day Cup (2024)
Replies
39
Views
2K
FearlessRoar
FearlessRoar
mominsaigol
[PICTURES/VIDEOS] Justice for Salman Ali Agha? Why can't he be a regular for Pakistan?
2 3 4
Replies
268
Views
33K
The Bald Eagle
The Bald Eagle
Back
Top