As for Babar, he will play his natural game. He is our best bat, world #1 in ODIs. If you think rankings are inaccurate, then propose a new ranking algorithm to the ICC. Fact is Babar can only play what is infront of him.
So what if Babar doesn't have higher gears, neither did Dravid. I would rather have a player play his natural game (which is quality anyway) and last longer at the crease, then get out quick playing an unnatural game.
The Pakistan players in your rich history list played in a different era. You should add Hanif Mohammed to the list too, however the players in the rich history list played their natural game, so there is no reason to expect anything else from Babar.
As for centuries in losses, not bothered, 66% of Tendulkar's 100 centuries never resulted in a win, so to single out Babar's century in a losing cause in simply biased and unjust. The main thing is that Babar has the ability to score centuries, and this is all that matters to me.
Now on to his captaincy, this is the only point I would agree with you. Babar does have much to learn, but the greatest teachers are mistakes, so I have faith in him captaining Pakistan in his first ever ODI WC captain on the hope he has learned from his mistakes.
I appreciate your genuine efforts but despite your post you continue to ridicule Babar, especially in this thread. Fine but it seems to me you want Babar to conquer the world, but are disappointed that he is not playing your version of an unnatural game, me on the other hand, I have followed Pakistan long enough to know to expect the unexpected and let the universe unfold.
Finally, if you think Pakistan are going to humiliate themselves at this WC, then why bother watching? Genuine question.
On a side note, there is an interesting theory called the Theory of Emergence. At a basic level it means individual components are useless (for example fans) but when they unite (emergence) they become powerful and influential.
So lets unite behind Pakistan and enjoy the WC!