because you do not need a magnifying angle for that catch. There are videos on x that show his foot being several inches inside the rope at all times, when he has the ball in his hands. There's very conclusive evidence.
Arre just say it , its a conspiracy by BCCI. Any Achievement by India has to be either bought and if Pakistan loses either it was match fixing or deliberate under performance. It is a divine mandate for the chosen people that the Greens are supposed to win everything on this good earth in a fair play.
This guy just called Bucknor a legendary umpire only because of his horrible umpiring vs India. That's the only yardstick.
I was watching a repeat and throughout the game, the 3rd umpire was looking not waste time on every review. And he got everything right.
There is a standard procedure that all umpires have to follow no matter if a kettleborough or aleem dar. Protocols have to be followed.
2.6 Fair and unfair play
Should the umpire check for ultraedge even if the batter shoulders arms and gets hit on the pad just because it's the "protocol" to check for ultraedge?
It is umpires primary job to take every step possible to ensure correct decision is made. Sometimes there is a clear cut decision made but umpires still ensures all possible options using the technology. Nothing wrong in that.
Can you please share the documentation of this supposed Standard procedure?
Brother, I understand your heart breaks with India's win but let's not go into this conspiracy mindset.
what do you think is umpire's job??
Let's not deflect. You have claimed about a "Standard procdure" "protocol" .. then there must be some documentation of the same. Please share the link. I don't mind proven wrong with facts, its always an opportunity to learn.
Yes this is umpire standard job and procedure while he is doing his job. Do you need laws and rule books for a job you are supposed to do??
ok I will answer and then get back to giving proof of the claim that "zooming is part of the standard procedure"
Use of technology is a standard part of umpiring now. No laws are needed for ICC to let umpires know about this stuff. It is their job to make sure they check all angles.
I don't see it written anywhere that Umpires has to zoom in.
Please don't deflect, you claimed its "Standard procedure" to use zoom, please share the rules of umpriring procedures by ICC or MCC or just tell me when was the last time zoom was used in a close call in an ICC tournament? (The second part is me giving you a way out) If you cant do either its better to back down from your conspiracy mindset.
Because it was evident to everyone but bitter Pakistanis. It was right below the commentary box and if you see the commentators clip they all got up saw it live from the best angle and no one had an issue with it.
Because it was evident to everyone but bitter Pakistanis. It was right below the commentary box and if you see the commentators clip they all got up saw it live from the best angle and no one had an issue with it.
Enough angles were used and decision made, India was playing South Africa. Literally no one from South African cricket fraternity is talking about it but you guys are just roye jaa rahe ho.
For your happiness, bhai paisa diya hai BCCI ne. Khareed liya hai Cup. Agli trophy thoda aur paisa daal denge.
@Dhakar Pola : Bangla fans have matured a little bit but our Pak bros continue to regress
Because it was evident to everyone but bitter Pakistanis. It was right below the commentary box and if you see the commentators clip they all got up saw it live from the best angle and no one had an issue with it.
Enough angles were used and decision made, India was playing South Africa. Literally no one from South African cricket fraternity is talking about it but you guys are just roye jaa rahe ho.
For your happiness, bhai paisa diya hai BCCI ne. Khareed liya hai Cup. Agli trophy thoda aur paisa daal denge.
@Dhakar Pola : Bangla fans have matured a little bit but our Pak bros continue to regress
We should remove umpire reviews and DRS and replace it with snap polls henceforth. The decision that gets most no of online votes will be regarded as the right one.
That is a serious allegation? Are you stating umpires are in BCCI's pockets? Are you questioning the integrity of ICC umpires?
I am calm mate, but given your AI stance , it is more pausible to be an allegation than a rhetorica question.
I think you don't understand what a rhetorical question means
So basically its a statement not a question, hence you are actually accusing the umpire for being corrupt.
Ignore those who are bitter. They are clutching at straws. Let us hope and pray they get peace.
Top View has score graphics blocking the part... Do we get to see a video without those graphics, can you share it? That will put this thread into peace!
Yeah and I'm sure bcci also buys Misbah-ul-Haq, Younis Khan and Akmal Brothers (combo offer) to drop Sachin's catches.. Afridi was the captain so he wasn't able to take that offer..
this should put all doubts to rest.
Check this video bro.
That's fine, but the offical top view from TV Broadcaster's camera is the best angle, but unfortunately score-mark is blocking the crucial spots! Now this will give the haters another chance to accuse that he has touched the boundary rope and that's why they have masked it through graphics!
One sports channel had a clear view from top. If I find then I will share, but there are many replays showing few inches of gap, it's not that close to have a debate.
See post #292.
I watched it on tv during the Sky tv coverage... definitely not some doctored YouTube vid
Its futile trying to wake up someone pretending to be asleep
Here's the icc drs protocol for the tv umpire-
@sweep_shot
Your lifeline has arrived
Miller was on strike with South Africa needing 16 off the last over, bowled, by Hardik Pandya when Yadav pulled off a wonderfully judged catch inches away from the boundary rope. Hardik sent down a low wide full toss, which Miller heaved across towards long-off where Yadav was stationed.
The ball seemed destined to be flying over the ropes for six when Yadav appeared out of nowhere and plucked it out of thin air. After a juggling effort, he managed to hold on, with his feet inches away from the boundary rope as Miller departed for a 17-ball 21. Third umpire Richard Kettleborough gave it out after a quick check as India firmed their grip on the trophy.
The catch, rated as "one of the greatest" in cricket history by Ian Smith, was not without controversy, however, with some on social media suggesting Yadav’s shoe had flicked the boundary rope as he ran backwards for the catch.
A South African fan wrote: “This certainly deserved more than one look, just saying. Boundary rope looks like it clearly moves.”
It was also pointed out that the cushioning of the boundary rope had seemingly moved back before the catch.
The ICC playing conditions make clear that it is the rope, not the white line, that constitutes the boundary. However, section 19.3 states: "If a solid object used to mark the boundary is disturbed for any reason, then the boundary shall be considered to be in its original position."
The white line suggests, but does not prove, that the rope may have been moved earlier in the contest. If it was moved, then an error was made in not putting it back in position. Section 19.3.2 states: "If a solid object used to mark the boundary is disturbed for any reason, the object shall be returned to its original position as soon as is practicable; if play is taking place, this shall be as soon as the ball is dead."
A closer look at Yadav’s catch confirms that his foot was over the white line but just in front of the cushioning.
A similar incident occurred during the 2023 ODI World Cup when a displaced boundary rope during the Pakistan-Netherlands clash led to questions. In that case, the rope had been moved in an earlier fixture and not replaced, meaning that, for the game in question, the boundary position was correctly taken as the position of the rope, rather than the white line.
Apparently it happened in the initial overs of the match when Kohli was batting. South African fielder didn't rectify the cushion properly, after a dive.
