What's new

Review of Imran Khan's tenure as Prime Minister (2018 - 2022)

cricketerB94

Local Club Regular
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Runs
1,671
Post of the Week
1
I don't visit or post much in TP section of this beautiful forum, but seeing the current political situation of Pakistan, I am visiting this section more often now a days. I see here that most of the people are pro PTI and according to them, Imran Khan (IK) is the greatest leader. That's fine, but then I see that these people have not spent even a single day under IK's government. That is where I ask that how can they judge someone from outside. So in this thread I am more interested in hearing about the reviews of people who have spent at least 1 year under IK's government.

Speaking of myself, I voted for IK in last general elections and spent every day since then under his government. There was a good vibe around him with other parties being exposed of corruption. My whole family was in support of IK and all of us voted for him and definitely wanted changes that he promised. I was a university student at that time doing BSCS and about a week before the elections, almost all of my university was in on this tabdeeli bandwagon. Anyways, we voted for IK, hoping for the best, and then his government started.

He disappointed right from the start with his political appointments. Buzdar as CM Punjab, Fawad Chaudary as minister of science and technology, Sheikh Rasheed as minister of Railway. He should had come up with a better team and better appointments for key positions. His speeches after becoming the PM were still like "Me inko NRO nahi dun ga" and "Me inko rulaon ga", instead of telling about his strategy to take this country upwards. He started making false promises again that he will do some kind of wonders in first 90 - 100 days of his government.

For most of his promises which he did to us in his election campaign, he mostly took u-turns on them. He used to tear apart the electricity bills on container and say that the taxes were too much to pay. He could not tackle the mafias and the result was that the price of everything had gone to sky. A poor man cannot afford to eat a meal 2 times a day and some cannot afford it even for a single time a day. He was unlucky with the global pandemic and global inflation, but in his tenure as PM, the dollar rate gone up, the petrol rate gone up, the daily goods rate gone up.

He did some good work as well, like sehet card, ehsaas program e.t.c. Regarding sehet card, I have heard only good things yet, but regarding ehsaas program, it needs to be better to facilitate the needy people. I know a needy person in my circle who is very old that he cannot do much work. He tried to get himself registered in ehsaas program, but could not do that.

He should have left gracefully after the first attempt of NCM, but he went on to open a new pandora box of that letter and created new enemies for himself. After doing it, he has made it very difficult for himself to get majority in next general elections, but let's see.

I am not in PTI's favour until they sort their team out. But it does not mean that I am in favour of PDM, as we all know that they are corrupt people. So in current scenario, we have corrupt people (PDM) on one side and incompetent people (PTI with current team) on other side. I hope PTI sorts its team out or some other party emerge before next general elections which can be trusted.
 
A romantic ousted by the incongruous establishment whose foes become friends as their like was being marginalized to irrelevance. That's a legacy in itself
 
It was marred with covid and financial meltdown caused by previous rulers. Worse time for anyone to take over. Im glad he still has support, if he gets 2/3 majority he can do alot of good for Pakistan.
 
Biggest mistake IK made was Bajwa extension and giving tickets too so many lotas. Someone like Aamir Liaqat was given a ticket in Karachi. Awful decision

I think the best thing IK did was not artificially overvalue rupee like PML N did. PML N ruined the country with that decision. The rate is high now compared to the dollar, however it is a fair valuation. One can check the REER rate to confirm.

Anyway Pakistan needs to increase exports, privatize state run enterprises, and increase tax on real estate. People in Pakistan prefer to buy plots as an investment, however that's not good for the economy. Its better for the economy if the money was invested in companies creating wealth. Wealth creation is solution to Pakistan's economic problems. And wealth is created through the private sector and not the government.
 
Former prime minister Imran Khan, who became the first-ever Pakistani leader to be voted out through a no-confidence motion, finished his nearly four-year stint with a mix of successes and failures.

Imran came to power through a popular vote in the 2018 general elections, promising to bolster a crippling economy, fight corruption and pursue accountability.

His critics lambast him for his mediocre handling of the economy, double-digit inflation and a spiraling rupee.

His supporters, though, hail him for a “corruption-free” government, smart handling of the coronavirus pandemic and an independent foreign policy.

“Imran Khan had a mix of successes and failures. But there is no doubt that he was a different prime minister in many ways,” Hasan Askari, a Lahore-based political analyst told Anadolu Agency.

“What tops the list is that he gave hope to the people of Pakistan, especially the youth, of a bright future. Unfortunately, though, that did not materialise,” he said.

Secondly, he added, Imran shattered the two-party system that dominated Pakistan’s politics for decades, breaking the vice-like grip of the Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).

Endorsing Askari’s views, Habib Akram, another political commentator from Lahore, pointed out that Imran tried to bring politics to the grassroots level, inspiring a large chunk of the population that was otherwise “apolitical”.

Speaking to Anadolu Agency, Akram said the cricketer-turned-politician introduced some “conventional” and “unconventional” projects for the common Pakistani, including a nationwide health insurance policy, establishing shelter homes and a monthly income support package for the poor.

The health policy provides a cover of Rs1 million ($5,400) to every family across Pakistan, with the exception of the southern Sindh province ruled by the PPP.

His monthly income support project, called Ehsaas, was a continuation of the PPP’s Benazir Income Support Programme, named after slain former prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

Akram credits Imran for changing the bureaucracy’s structure that was dominated by just one province, the most populous and politically significant Punjab.

“Previously, the bureaucratic structure, particularly for key posts, was predominantly Punjab-centric. It was Imran who, for the first time, balanced this structure and placed officers from all over Pakistan on key positions,” he said.



Economic hits and misses

Askari and Akram see Imran’s “poor” handling of the economy as his biggest failure during the three years and eight months he served as premier.

READ Struggle against 'foreign conspiracy' begins today: Imran Khan

Unlike his predecessor, three-time former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, Imran inherited a relatively stable economy with an annual growth rate of almost 5.6%, a receding power crisis and a much-improved law and order situation in the country.

As the PTI government faltered in managing the economy, the growth rate in its first three years remained between 2% and 3%.

However, it jumped to nearly 5% last year as economic activity picked up in the country, following the lifting of Covid-19 curbs.

Imran’s economic managers, most of whom were also part of the previous two governments, cited the pandemic as the chief reason for the slow economic progress.
Some critics, however, say the economy was sputtering even before the pandemic.

In recent weeks, the rupee has plummeted to an all-time low, currently standing at 186 to a dollar, adding to the country’s already mounting trade deficit, colossal foreign debt and ever-increasing inflation that remained in double digits throughout Imran’s tenure.

“Poor handling of the economy and governance issues have overshadowed his achievements and good initiatives,” Askari said, adding that Imran has “disappointed” Pakistanis who believed he could lead an economic turnaround.

Akram said the ousted premier should have focused on small businesses and industries to generate economic activity, instead of giving “amnesty schemes” and other privileges to big businesses and industrialists.

“This was a mistake that Imran himself has recently admitted,” he added.

There are, however, some economists who see “good omens” for Pakistan’s struggling economy, such as the significant increase in exports and manufacturing, along with a dip in the current account deficit.

‘Poor’ choices

Tauseef Ahmed Khan, a Karachi-based political analyst, reckons that Imran’s choices for key political and government posts were “poor”.

Citing the example of the chief ministers of Punjab and the northwestern Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, he contended that Imran deliberately appointed “weak” people to these posts to avoid competition.
Sharing a similar view, Askari said: “He (Imran) completely failed in Punjab, which is the power base of

Pakistan’s politics. His choice for the chief minister of such an important province was extremely poor, which subsequently created serious governance issues.”

Unlike past governments, Imran enjoyed a cordial relationship with the powerful army, which has largely had sour ties with all previous civilian setups.

Nonetheless, according to Askari, mishandling of some crucial matters, including the extension of current army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa in 2019 and appointment of the head of the premier spy agency last October, dented Imran’s otherwise cordial relations with the military.

Another issue between the two sides was Imran’s insistence on retaining Usman Buzdar as chief minister of Punjab despite his poor performance, Askari added.

According to rumours rife in Pakistan, Buzdar was kept on the post because Imran’s wife, a spiritual guide of sorts, saw him as a good omen and warned that his removal would lead to the entire government’s collapse.

The prime minister and his wife have time and again denied the claims.

Askari also identified Imran’s lack of understanding of parliamentary politics as another reason for his unceremonious departure

“He failed to pull together not just his allies but even his own party members. This egoistic approach doesn’t work in parliamentary politics, especially when you don’t have a clear majority,” he added.

Youth factor

Imran appears to have a significant hold over the country’s youth, who make up around 60% of the total population of over 220 million.

His charismatic personality, aggressive tone and nationalistic rhetoric seemed to resonate most with the youth and millions of overseas Pakistanis, two groups that form the PTI’s support base.

However, simultaneously, he is accused of encouraging aggression and violent tendencies among the youth.

When it comes to defending Imran, his followers, irrespective of the age group but particularly the younger ones, are known for crossing basic limits of decency, especially on social media.

Still, though, many see him as a savior for the common man, be it as a cricketer, philanthropist or politician, according to Askari.

“The game is not over for him. He can make a comeback. He just needs to learn from his mistakes,” he said.
Askari believes Imran’s anti-American narrative may give him an edge in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and the tribal belt, which borders Afghanistan and suffered the brunt of Washington’s so-called war on terror.

Tauseef, nonetheless, sees that narrative as “dangerous”, fearing it may trigger another wave of extremism in the country, especially among the youth.

“It will also harm the country’s foreign policy,” he warned.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2351972/imran-left-pm-office-with-a-mixed-record
 
Imran Khan is such a big inspiration that this thread has little replies. Lol.

I agree with the points mentioned in the OP. We voted the PTI candidate also from one of the Gulberg constituencies but the seat was won by Noon, and can't remember if it was Ayaz Sadiq or Ali Pervaiz or someone else. Something to note: Even at a time when PTI was more popular than ever, there were many seats won by Noon from Punjab.

Anyway, adding to the OP points: Appointing Buzdar was an embarrassing decision, but sticking with it despite criticism was beyond idiotic. The point was that Noon is focusing too much on Lahore so PTI will work on other areas Punjab areas. I can't comment on what work has been done there, but Lahore lately has become a kachra kundi mess like Karachi.

We know the rupee got devalued, economy nosedived. This has been the case with the previous governments too, when Noon league and PPP made government. I don't think many realise that the trade deficit started to become a major problem from Musharraf era, and when PPP and Noon were forming government, they were already fighting a crisis which grew under their era also, but PTI hasn't been able to do anything to resist the slide.

Also, don't think many here know that Shahbaz Sharif has always been a more popular figure than Nawaz, even when the latter was the PM. In Punjab, Shahbaz Sharif holds a lot of respect for getting work done- that is why major infrastructure projects in Punjab have happened under Noon league era.

There was a lot of noise that PTI has built langarkhaanas all over Pakistan but those were also was built by NGOs.

The debt added by Noon has resulted in infrastructure being built, metro and CPEC projects. These are used by awaam on a daily basis and created jobs. What has the debts added by PTI resulted in? Yet, the debt added by PTI is the highest on record. It doesn't add up. And the dollar has recorded an all-time high.

The inflation has risen but beginner level salaries are still 25, 30 thousand. That's not near enough to pay the bills and provide food for middle-class families. Add to that the income tax proposed, and the tax for bank transactions as well- and sales tax- all going up.

All Imran Khan has done is gathered youth into doing bhangras on streets, and nothing else of significance. With a young population, and with the charismatic leader that we had at our disposal, what has been the rise in start-ups? Where are the entrepreneurs? Was that environment created by the government in the last four years? The soft skills of Pakistanis is as low as it can get- we can't even communicate with confidence. We don't need the kamyaab jawaan blanket, has there been any youth-dedicated vocational centres to increase market-awareness, training, subsidize it for them to make it easy, and have it running in each province?

Question to ask is: What is the youth actually doing? This was a major promise of Imran Khan to empower youth. The empowerment has only resulted in bhangras.

Lastly, we know Imran Khan's stance on minority and the blatant disregard for it i.e. Ahamdis. It's embarrassing what happened to Atif Mian. Also, the school curriculum got changed and became worse as it was forced. Ask anyone in non-muslim minority about their experience with the new school curriculum, and the stereotypical nature of the content in textbooks, and you know why the next generation coming up will be out-dated, and behind the world by 20 years.
 
Ehsaas program, Sehat Card, Covid management and environmental initiatives are the big highlights.

Downsides are economy and team selection.

He was inexperienced and had a weak coalition government so people should not have had high expectations.

Really unfair to judge him on a term his government didn't get to complete.
 
According to State Bank of Pakistan, Pakistan's total external debt and liabilities in 2018 were 29,861.2 Billion Rs. (https://www.sbp.org.pk/reports/stat_...ternalDebt.pdf). This has increased to 51,724.2 Billion Rs in December 2021 (https://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/Summary.pdf).

The average USD rate in 2018 was 121.57. Using this rate, to make the aforementioned amounts currency neutral, we had a debt of $245B when Imran Khan took over and this amount (using the same conversation rate) stands at $425B.

So in the three years PTI's government ruled the country out total debt and liabilities according to State Bank of Pakistan almost doubled.

Out of this, the external debt stood at $99.238B and currently stands at $130B (as of last quarter of 2021) (https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/external-debt). That's a 31% increase in 3 years. If you have an issue with the quoted source, you can use the SBP summaries I referenced above to cross-check these amounts.

All the so-called programs that are being lauded were financed via loans and are not sustainable. He did nothing but burden us with more debt.
 
Finance ministry is the main artery of the government. Appointing TTF PPP finance ministers was such a flop move. Does Pakistan have no talent?
 
Lived under his tenure , he did decently in quite a lot of sectors and tried to do fundamental reforms, specially if you see it in reference to once in a century type of pandemic and coalition govt. Those who expected miracles dont know much about how strong economies are made and what is starting position of Pakistan compared to it. People act as if Pakistan was sweden under PML N and PPP.
 
Very hard to look beyond statistics. Perhaps good work on social reforms but economy has been destroyed.

2006
Pakistan GDP per capita - 836 USD
India GDP per capita - 806 USD
Bangladesh GDP per capita -509 USD


2018
Pakistan GDP per capita - 1482 USD
India GDP per capita - 1997 USD
Bangladesh GDP per capita -1698 USD


2020
Pakistan GDP per capita - 1188 USD
India GDP per capita - 1927 USD
Bangladesh GDP per capita -1961 USD
 
Very hard to look beyond statistics. Perhaps good work on social reforms but economy has been destroyed.

2006
Pakistan GDP per capita - 836 USD
India GDP per capita - 806 USD
Bangladesh GDP per capita -509 USD


2018
Pakistan GDP per capita - 1482 USD
India GDP per capita - 1997 USD
Bangladesh GDP per capita -1698 USD


2020
Pakistan GDP per capita - 1188 USD
India GDP per capita - 1927 USD
Bangladesh GDP per capita -1961 USD

Hopefully he will learn and do better the next time. I think giving the keys back to those who have caused ruin to the country will not be a good move in spite of IK's say below par economic performance.

He is probably the only leader in the country who has been clean as whistle. They can blame his wife and other people but not him. Hopefully he will pick better people in the future and improve in these areas.
 
A good summary
 

Attachments

  • 20220410_111527.jpg
    20220410_111527.jpg
    98.4 KB · Views: 205
So much advocate for IK in PP. Yet no one can mention his achievements here in this thread except a few.
 
So much advocate for IK in PP. Yet no one can mention his achievements here in this thread except a few.

Republicans vs Democrats, BJP vs Congress, Labor vs conservatives we can clearly tell the difference in the ideology and policies.

However I cannot separate any ideological differences between political parties in Pakistan.

They all invoke religion, they all seem to toe the line of the army even though Ik might have gone rouge recently on that aspect. They all sound the same.

The issue seems to be corrupt vs non-corrupt. That is not an ideological battle. You can make a case for competent vs incompetent too. Being non-corrupt and competent are not the same.
 
Republicans vs Democrats, BJP vs Congress, Labor vs conservatives we can clearly tell the difference in the ideology and policies.

However I cannot separate any ideological differences between political parties in Pakistan.

They all invoke religion, they all seem to toe the line of the army even though Ik might have gone rouge recently on that aspect. They all sound the same.

The issue seems to be corrupt vs non-corrupt. That is not an ideological battle. You can make a case for competent vs incompetent too. Being non-corrupt and competent are not the same.
Ding ding ding.

That's the main differentiation.
 
Ding ding ding.

That's the main differentiation.

You didn’t get my point.

Eliminating corruption is not the only solution. It is part of the solution, not the entire objective.

Just because someone is non-corrupt doesn’t mean much when they are confirming to the same status quo and overall the same political ideology as everyone else.
 
Republicans vs Democrats, BJP vs Congress, Labor vs conservatives we can clearly tell the difference in the ideology and policies.

However I cannot separate any ideological differences between political parties in Pakistan.

They all invoke religion, they all seem to toe the line of the army even though Ik might have gone rouge recently on that aspect. They all sound the same.

The issue seems to be corrupt vs non-corrupt. That is not an ideological battle. You can make a case for competent vs incompetent too. Being non-corrupt and competent are not the same.

You can. For example Jaamat-e-Islami is an Islamist party. PPP is a liberal party.

PML N is a capitalist party while PPP is socialist.

Etc, etc, etc you can see the ideological differences.
 
Imran Khan is such a big inspiration that this thread has little replies. Lol.

I agree with the points mentioned in the OP. We voted the PTI candidate also from one of the Gulberg constituencies but the seat was won by Noon, and can't remember if it was Ayaz Sadiq or Ali Pervaiz or someone else. Something to note: Even at a time when PTI was more popular than ever, there were many seats won by Noon from Punjab.

Anyway, adding to the OP points: Appointing Buzdar was an embarrassing decision, but sticking with it despite criticism was beyond idiotic. The point was that Noon is focusing too much on Lahore so PTI will work on other areas Punjab areas. I can't comment on what work has been done there, but Lahore lately has become a kachra kundi mess like Karachi.

We know the rupee got devalued, economy nosedived. This has been the case with the previous governments too, when Noon league and PPP made government. I don't think many realise that the trade deficit started to become a major problem from Musharraf era, and when PPP and Noon were forming government, they were already fighting a crisis which grew under their era also, but PTI hasn't been able to do anything to resist the slide.

Also, don't think many here know that Shahbaz Sharif has always been a more popular figure than Nawaz, even when the latter was the PM. In Punjab, Shahbaz Sharif holds a lot of respect for getting work done- that is why major infrastructure projects in Punjab have happened under Noon league era.

There was a lot of noise that PTI has built langarkhaanas all over Pakistan but those were also was built by NGOs.

The debt added by Noon has resulted in infrastructure being built, metro and CPEC projects. These are used by awaam on a daily basis and created jobs. What has the debts added by PTI resulted in? Yet, the debt added by PTI is the highest on record. It doesn't add up. And the dollar has recorded an all-time high.

The inflation has risen but beginner level salaries are still 25, 30 thousand. That's not near enough to pay the bills and provide food for middle-class families. Add to that the income tax proposed, and the tax for bank transactions as well- and sales tax- all going up.

All Imran Khan has done is gathered youth into doing bhangras on streets, and nothing else of significance. With a young population, and with the charismatic leader that we had at our disposal, what has been the rise in start-ups? Where are the entrepreneurs? Was that environment created by the government in the last four years? The soft skills of Pakistanis is as low as it can get- we can't even communicate with confidence. We don't need the kamyaab jawaan blanket, has there been any youth-dedicated vocational centres to increase market-awareness, training, subsidize it for them to make it easy, and have it running in each province?

Question to ask is: What is the youth actually doing? This was a major promise of Imran Khan to empower youth. The empowerment has only resulted in bhangras.

Lastly, we know Imran Khan's stance on minority and the blatant disregard for it i.e. Ahamdis. It's embarrassing what happened to Atif Mian. Also, the school curriculum got changed and became worse as it was forced. Ask anyone in non-muslim minority about their experience with the new school curriculum, and the stereotypical nature of the content in textbooks, and you know why the next generation coming up will be out-dated, and behind the world by 20 years.

Thank you for adding these points as all of them almost accurately reflects his term. Specially your point regarding Shehbaz Sharif. I spent every day under his CM'ship as well and he really made Lahore into some first world city. There was always his danda around everyone as he was not tolerant and had the habit of firing incompetent people on spot. This is what is needed for Pakistani people. Under Buzdar, everyone was just relax and no one wanted to do any kind of work for which they were getting paid.

Regarding youth, most of them are going the tiktok way or youtube/insta way. There are no jobs and the skills are too difficult to learn, so this is the easier choice that they have got.

All in all. there were not a lot of positives (if any) under IK's government. And whoever I meet in Lahore or Punjab, they sound like they are not ever going to vote for PTI even if their life depend on that.
 
Thank you for adding these points as all of them almost accurately reflects his term. Specially your point regarding Shehbaz Sharif. I spent every day under his CM'ship as well and he really made Lahore into some first world city. There was always his danda around everyone as he was not tolerant and had the habit of firing incompetent people on spot. This is what is needed for Pakistani people. Under Buzdar, everyone was just relax and no one wanted to do any kind of work for which they were getting paid.

Regarding youth, most of them are going the tiktok way or youtube/insta way. There are no jobs and the skills are too difficult to learn, so this is the easier choice that they have got.

All in all. there were not a lot of positives (if any) under IK's government. And whoever I meet in Lahore or Punjab, they sound like they are not ever going to vote for PTI even if their life depend on that.

Because he spent most of the funds their. Thats why PML N still won most seats in Lahore, and Central Punjab, but they lost the bulk of South Punjab seats to PTI
 
Because he spent most of the funds their. Thats why PML N still won most seats in Lahore, and Central Punjab, but they lost the bulk of South Punjab seats to PTI

It's not about funds or money that he spent, it's more about his management. Under his government in Punjab, every government worker used to be on his toes. And SS was famous to do the surprise surveys of places and fire incompetent people on spot. Under his government in Punjab, everything used to work like a well-oiled machine. The roads used to be cleaned early in the morning, green belts around main roads, government workers used to be very disciplined. Only funding and money cannot do all this, his danda was well-known in Punjab.
 
It's not about funds or money that he spent, it's more about his management. Under his government in Punjab, every government worker used to be on his toes. And SS was famous to do the surprise surveys of places and fire incompetent people on spot. Under his government in Punjab, everything used to work like a well-oiled machine. The roads used to be cleaned early in the morning, green belts around main roads, government workers used to be very disciplined. Only funding and money cannot do all this, his danda was well-known in Punjab.

That's true, he was a good administrator. When i visited Lahore in 2016 almost everyone I asked supported PML N. Central Punjab is a lost cause for PTI.

However if he treated South Punjab the same way as Central Punjab then PML N would not have lost from their.
 
His biggest no.1 was SMQ, which led to his second biggest mistake no.2 Gen Faiz Hameed as DGI ISI

The peer network working for Iranian intel was the sole reason for his breakdown with the army and Bajwa.
 
The other parties have a good 10-15 years of experience of running a national govt. Imran's biggest handicap was his lack of experience, was he perfect? No, but most civil burecrats and military officials i know off who have worked with him acknowledge his naivity, idealism, lack of experience in running a govt but they all vouch for the fact that he was the hardest working prime minister they ever worked for.
 
Political victimization via NAB.
Under Imran Khan's tenure all major opposition leaders were arrested. The list includes: Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz Sharif, Khawaja Saad Rafique, Khawaja Salman Rafique, Shehbaz Sharif, Hamza Shehbaz, Khursheed Shah, Faryal Talpur, Agha Siraj Durrani, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, Ahsan Iqbal and Maryam Nawaz Sharif.

With the exception of Nawaz Sharif and Maryam (who was already sentenced before IK took charge) not a single one of these cases resulted in conviction in the PTI’s three years.

The judiciary also criticised NAB for failing to produce a convincing case against many opposition leaders which led to the courts giving them bail.

Looted Money never brought back
Even though PTI launched as massive anti-corruption drive against its oppositions, they never achieved anything. One of the promised made by Imran Khan during his election campaign was that he would bring back money looted by previous rulers and stashed abroad.

On January 24th 2022, Barrister Shahzad Akbar resigned from his post as as head of the Asset Recovery Unit. he PM as well as Mr Akbar had kept on claiming regularly that they had identified this looted money and the nation would soon hear the good news. However, more than three years later, the whereabouts of this money remain a mystery and the government has failed to explain why its claims are just that and nothing more.

In addition, Mr Akbar had also led the accountability drive against the PTI’s opponents — and specifically the Sharif family — but as yet no solid evidence has been brought to the courts to substantiate the allegations made by Mr Akbar and his various colleagues in numerous press conferences.

Looming IMF Crisis
Imran Khan appointed four finance ministers and about half a dozen finance secretaries since 2018. He also frequently changed his tax chief and the head of the Board of Investment. Obviously, the economy was massively mismanaged which I can discuss later. However, Khan leaves his position with a massive looming IFM crisis on Pakistan's head.

Initially, he was reluctant to seek a bailout from the International Monetary Fund. Then a year after he did so in 2019, the program -- Pakistan’s 13th such loan in 30 years -- was suspended because Pakistan failed to meet IMF conditions for it. The plan was revived last year after Khan’s administration agreed to tougher conditions, including raising oil prices and electricity tariffs. But a few months later, Khan cut domestic fuel costs and power rates to soothe public anger over rising living costs, measures seen as putting the IMF program in jeopardy.

Such measures have put a massive risk on getting further support from IMF and jeopardizes the economic stability of the country.

Ordinance Factory and mockery of the democratic process
Ignoring what Imran Khan and PTI did recently in the parliament which was not only unconstitutional but also undemocratic, Imran Khan and PTI have been, during their tenure, using undemocratic means to pass bills. Instead of debating and discussing bills in the parliament and voting on these as how it should be in a democracy, Imran Khan and PTI have been passing presidential ordinances to pass these controversial bills.

Two cases are worth mentioning. The federal government, through a notification dated March 26, 2021, announced the ‘removal’ of the chairperson of the Higher Education Commission Dr Tariq Banuri. This notification was challenged in the Sindh High Court, which stayed the appointment of a new chairperson. As Dr Banuri was removed pursuant to the Higher Education (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which reduced the tenure of the chairperson from four to two years, the government argued there were no ulterior motives behind his ‘removal’; rather, he ‘ceased to hold office’ by the operation of law. Similarly, MNA Mohsin Shahnawaz Ranjha challenged the legality of eight ordinances promulgated by the president in a single day (Oct 30, 2019) in the Islamabad High Court.

This government, in particular, has placed increased reliance on ordinances to resolve routine governance and policy challenges. It has tried to resolve matters related to the Pakistan Medical Commission, Elections Act, 2017, FATF and the provision of consular access to RAW spy Kulbhushan Jadhav through ordinances. However, upon close examination of the constitutional provisions which grant this power to the president, it is clear that the invocation of these powers should be the exception rather than the norm.

Article 89 of the Constitution allows the president to promulgate ordinances. However, the president has to satisfy a two-pronged test to enact ordinances. Firstly, the Senate or National Assembly must not be in session and, secondly, there must exist circumstances that render it necessary to take immediate action.

Buzdar's Appointment as CM Punjab
Buzdar a former PML-N and PML-Q party member joined PTI in the 2018 election season. Over the three years of his tenure not a single credible explanation would be advanced by the ruling party as to why this man was handed the fates of a hundred million people.

People based in Punjab know very well of the corruption stories doing the rounds with regards to Buzdar and transfers. Moreover, we are also very well aware of the negative impact his tenure has had on the entire province. However, personal anecdotes aside even the Supreme Court summoned him on allegations of transferring Pakpattan’s District Police Officer in the middle of the night, at the behest of a buddy called Ahsan Gujjar. The inquiry report, ordered by the Supreme Court, found that the DPO’s transfer orders flowed directly from the chief minister’s office. The case concluded only after the unconditional apologies of Mr Buzdar, Mr Gujjar, and the Inspector General of Police.

Even police chiefs were changed over three years, one of which prompted the resignation of Nasir Khan Durrani. Mr Durrani had shepherded the PTI’s celebrated police reforms in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and was brought to Lahore for the same purpose.

NAB opened up against the chief minister on a variety of allegations, from accepting graft over liquor licenses to illegal land allotments, while his principal secretary came under investigation for assets beyond means.

PTI's role in the Sugar Crisis
The sugar inquiry commission held Mr Buzdar responsible for authorising a whopping Rs2.9 billion subsidy. akistan exported more than four million tonnes of sugar over the past five years and more than Rs29 billion had been given to sugar mills in terms of export subsidy.

Exporting sugar with subsidy means that we are exporting on international rates which are lower than the cost of production claimed by sugar mills and the differential cost is being paid from the taxpayers’ hard-earned money

Asad Umar informed the commission that the country was in dire need of foreign exchange at that time and since there were sufficient stocks of sugar available in the country. However, there was no reliable stock count done to back up this claim made by Asad Umar. The inquiry stated “The response of Asad Umar regarding the change of the ECC decision about the freight support (subsidy) by placing it on the discretion of the provinces was found not convincing by the commission."

Basically, the government provided subsidy from the tax-payers money which sugar mill owners used to export the sugar at lower prices then at international level thereby profiting themselves while the PTI government supported this move by not accurately estimating the stock count which further resulted in profiteering by the mill owners who made profits in excess of Rs100bn by increasing prices.

The commission concluded that the subsidy granted was unjustified. “The CM Punjab pleaded his case that the subsidy was granted by the cabinet and it was a collective decision. However, keeping in view the minutes of the meeting dated 06-12-2018, which the CM Punjab claims to have forgotten, clearly indicates otherwise."

However, no charges were brought against Buzdar for providing this illegal subsidy and no charges against those responsible for ensuring and accurately estimating the stock count. In the end, Jehangir Tareen was made a scape goat and scarified.

Benefits that sunk the economy further
During their tenure the PTI government provided benefits to the people of Pakistan in the shape of lower fuel and electricity prices and subsidized loans and tax exemptions for selected sectors. Even though the public celebrated these benefits one needs to realize that these will further deteriorate Pakistan’s financial health, because they create a burden that its decrepit tax machinery cannot shoulder through prudent revenue collection elsewhere.

For an efficient economic system, it is essential that prices be linked directly to costs. When underlying costs rise, as they do when international commodity prices increase, the government cannot insulate the populace from higher domestic prices without creating a higher debt burden for future generations. Insufficient tax collection from broad swathes of the economy and a lack of productivity relative to other countries are at the core of our economy’s ailments. Either because of a lack of understanding amongst the top leadership or an unwillingness to start politically painful reforms.

Reducing petrol and electricity prices would trigger a deficit pile-up, which would be financed through more borrowing, which would further crowd-out private sector borrowing, and put upward pressure on interest rates. An already precarious fiscal balance would further deteriorate, while the ever-envied current account deficit would continue to widen.

Sehat Card
Despite the government’s tall claims, the Sehat Sahulat Programme (SSP) in Punjab has failed to achieve the desired targets. Under this health facility scheme, Insaf Sehat Cards had been issued to five million families in 36 districts of the province.

However, only 93,000 people could benefit from this facility within one year, making the success rate of the programme only two per cent.

Some top government officials as well as the provincial finance department have also expressed concerns regarding the success of the programme. According to sources, by the end of the financial year 2019, 11.03 billion had been spent on the scheme. In the current financial year, Rs12 billion has been allocated for this project.

What is more, the Punjab Health Insurance Initiative Management Company has demanded an additional Rs5 billion to sustain the Sehat Sahulat Programme.

Under the SSP, medical services can only be availed in case of hospitalisation, that too in a hospital included in the panel of the programme. At present, more than 200 hospitals across the province are on the panel, but only about 17 of them are government hospitals.

The programme does not include emergency and OPD facilities, which is why this facility has been largely useless for the masses. Government employees, journalists, and people belonging to some other professions were also suggested to be included in the programme, but the federal government did not agree.

The incompatibility of official rates and the market price of treatment, especially involving surgeries, points to the haste in rolling out Sehat Cards. It shows us that this was done prematurely and the required consensus among stakeholders was lacking. This has also exposed their inability to plug the loopholes in the system surfacing every now and then.

It is frequently stated that a Sehat Card offers coverage of up to Rs 1 million a year, yet it actually provides Rs 460,000 per family per year. The coverage is extendable to up to Rs1 million under special circumstances.

Under Package-I, priority disease treatment, all cardholders are allotted Rs 400,000 per family per year. This package covers treatment for certain specific types of diseases including heart disease, chronic diseases like tuberculosis, hepatitis-B and C, HIV, chronic liver disease, dialysis, burns and accidents, chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy for cancer, neurosurgical procedures and treatment for organ failure.

Under Package-II, secondary care treatment, the cardholders are eligible to receive up to Rs60,000 coverage per family per year. The package covers all types of medical and surgical illnesses and maternity services including C-section.

Ehsaas Card Program
The Ehsaas card program was just a rebranding of BISP. It is laden with the same problems that its predecessor. The Ehsaas card program expanded on the BISP and added seven million more families vs what was included in BISP. However, lack of proper management has resulted in issues for those trying to collect the funds.

News reports from various outlets cover the troubles faced by those trying to collect money from the Ehsaas program. There are reports about people not receiving their funds, about biometric issues at cash points and all in all mismanagement of the program resulting in the people not receiving the aid they were promised.

Imports vs Exports
I don't need a write-up here. I think the below graph clearly illustrates the problem faced by Pakistan

3t47bmu6t0t81.png

Debt
I will copy/paste what I have posted a few times already on this forum with regards to the debt accumulated by PTI during its 3 year tenure

According to State Bank of Pakistan, Pakistan's total external debt and liabilities in 2018 were 29,861.2 Billion Rs. (https://www.sbp.org.pk/reports/stat_...ternalDebt.pdf). This has increased to 51,724.2 Billion Rs in December 2021 (https://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/Summary.pdf).

The average USD rate in 2018 was 121.57. Using this rate, to make the aforementioned amounts currency neutral, we had a debt of $245B when Imran Khan took over and this amount (using the same conversation rate) stands at $425B.

So in the three years PTI's government ruled the country out total debt and liabilities according to State Bank of Pakistan almost doubled.

Out of this, the external debt stood at $99.238B and currently stands at $130B (as of last quarter of 2021) (https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/external-debt). That's a 31% increase in 3 years. If you have an issue with the quoted source, you can use the SBP summaries I referenced above to cross-check these amounts.
 
I've not gone into details about his treatment of minorities, of suppression of freedom of speech of the increased perception of corruption during his tenure, of suppression of media and the atrocities committed against those who dared speak up against his regime, and of his horrible foreign policy. I'll save those points for another time.
 
Excellent review above by [MENTION=107753]uberkoen[/MENTION]. An eye opener.
 
Can someone post the graph of stock index over the last 4 years and compare with benchmarks of India, Bangladesh, SL and other major economies.
 
Political victimization via NAB.
Under Imran Khan's tenure all major opposition leaders were arrested. The list includes: Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz Sharif, Khawaja Saad Rafique, Khawaja Salman Rafique, Shehbaz Sharif, Hamza Shehbaz, Khursheed Shah, Faryal Talpur, Agha Siraj Durrani, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, Ahsan Iqbal and Maryam Nawaz Sharif.

With the exception of Nawaz Sharif and Maryam (who was already sentenced before IK took charge) not a single one of these cases resulted in conviction in the PTI’s three years.

The judiciary also criticised NAB for failing to produce a convincing case against many opposition leaders which led to the courts giving them bail.

Looted Money never brought back
Even though PTI launched as massive anti-corruption drive against its oppositions, they never achieved anything. One of the promised made by Imran Khan during his election campaign was that he would bring back money looted by previous rulers and stashed abroad.

On January 24th 2022, Barrister Shahzad Akbar resigned from his post as as head of the Asset Recovery Unit. he PM as well as Mr Akbar had kept on claiming regularly that they had identified this looted money and the nation would soon hear the good news. However, more than three years later, the whereabouts of this money remain a mystery and the government has failed to explain why its claims are just that and nothing more.

In addition, Mr Akbar had also led the accountability drive against the PTI’s opponents — and specifically the Sharif family — but as yet no solid evidence has been brought to the courts to substantiate the allegations made by Mr Akbar and his various colleagues in numerous press conferences.

Looming IMF Crisis
Imran Khan appointed four finance ministers and about half a dozen finance secretaries since 2018. He also frequently changed his tax chief and the head of the Board of Investment. Obviously, the economy was massively mismanaged which I can discuss later. However, Khan leaves his position with a massive looming IFM crisis on Pakistan's head.

Initially, he was reluctant to seek a bailout from the International Monetary Fund. Then a year after he did so in 2019, the program -- Pakistan’s 13th such loan in 30 years -- was suspended because Pakistan failed to meet IMF conditions for it. The plan was revived last year after Khan’s administration agreed to tougher conditions, including raising oil prices and electricity tariffs. But a few months later, Khan cut domestic fuel costs and power rates to soothe public anger over rising living costs, measures seen as putting the IMF program in jeopardy.

Such measures have put a massive risk on getting further support from IMF and jeopardizes the economic stability of the country.

Ordinance Factory and mockery of the democratic process
Ignoring what Imran Khan and PTI did recently in the parliament which was not only unconstitutional but also undemocratic, Imran Khan and PTI have been, during their tenure, using undemocratic means to pass bills. Instead of debating and discussing bills in the parliament and voting on these as how it should be in a democracy, Imran Khan and PTI have been passing presidential ordinances to pass these controversial bills.

Two cases are worth mentioning. The federal government, through a notification dated March 26, 2021, announced the ‘removal’ of the chairperson of the Higher Education Commission Dr Tariq Banuri. This notification was challenged in the Sindh High Court, which stayed the appointment of a new chairperson. As Dr Banuri was removed pursuant to the Higher Education (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which reduced the tenure of the chairperson from four to two years, the government argued there were no ulterior motives behind his ‘removal’; rather, he ‘ceased to hold office’ by the operation of law. Similarly, MNA Mohsin Shahnawaz Ranjha challenged the legality of eight ordinances promulgated by the president in a single day (Oct 30, 2019) in the Islamabad High Court.

This government, in particular, has placed increased reliance on ordinances to resolve routine governance and policy challenges. It has tried to resolve matters related to the Pakistan Medical Commission, Elections Act, 2017, FATF and the provision of consular access to RAW spy Kulbhushan Jadhav through ordinances. However, upon close examination of the constitutional provisions which grant this power to the president, it is clear that the invocation of these powers should be the exception rather than the norm.

Article 89 of the Constitution allows the president to promulgate ordinances. However, the president has to satisfy a two-pronged test to enact ordinances. Firstly, the Senate or National Assembly must not be in session and, secondly, there must exist circumstances that render it necessary to take immediate action.

Buzdar's Appointment as CM Punjab
Buzdar a former PML-N and PML-Q party member joined PTI in the 2018 election season. Over the three years of his tenure not a single credible explanation would be advanced by the ruling party as to why this man was handed the fates of a hundred million people.

People based in Punjab know very well of the corruption stories doing the rounds with regards to Buzdar and transfers. Moreover, we are also very well aware of the negative impact his tenure has had on the entire province. However, personal anecdotes aside even the Supreme Court summoned him on allegations of transferring Pakpattan’s District Police Officer in the middle of the night, at the behest of a buddy called Ahsan Gujjar. The inquiry report, ordered by the Supreme Court, found that the DPO’s transfer orders flowed directly from the chief minister’s office. The case concluded only after the unconditional apologies of Mr Buzdar, Mr Gujjar, and the Inspector General of Police.

Even police chiefs were changed over three years, one of which prompted the resignation of Nasir Khan Durrani. Mr Durrani had shepherded the PTI’s celebrated police reforms in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and was brought to Lahore for the same purpose.

NAB opened up against the chief minister on a variety of allegations, from accepting graft over liquor licenses to illegal land allotments, while his principal secretary came under investigation for assets beyond means.

PTI's role in the Sugar Crisis
The sugar inquiry commission held Mr Buzdar responsible for authorising a whopping Rs2.9 billion subsidy. akistan exported more than four million tonnes of sugar over the past five years and more than Rs29 billion had been given to sugar mills in terms of export subsidy.

Exporting sugar with subsidy means that we are exporting on international rates which are lower than the cost of production claimed by sugar mills and the differential cost is being paid from the taxpayers’ hard-earned money

Asad Umar informed the commission that the country was in dire need of foreign exchange at that time and since there were sufficient stocks of sugar available in the country. However, there was no reliable stock count done to back up this claim made by Asad Umar. The inquiry stated “The response of Asad Umar regarding the change of the ECC decision about the freight support (subsidy) by placing it on the discretion of the provinces was found not convincing by the commission."

Basically, the government provided subsidy from the tax-payers money which sugar mill owners used to export the sugar at lower prices then at international level thereby profiting themselves while the PTI government supported this move by not accurately estimating the stock count which further resulted in profiteering by the mill owners who made profits in excess of Rs100bn by increasing prices.

The commission concluded that the subsidy granted was unjustified. “The CM Punjab pleaded his case that the subsidy was granted by the cabinet and it was a collective decision. However, keeping in view the minutes of the meeting dated 06-12-2018, which the CM Punjab claims to have forgotten, clearly indicates otherwise."

However, no charges were brought against Buzdar for providing this illegal subsidy and no charges against those responsible for ensuring and accurately estimating the stock count. In the end, Jehangir Tareen was made a scape goat and scarified.

Benefits that sunk the economy further
During their tenure the PTI government provided benefits to the people of Pakistan in the shape of lower fuel and electricity prices and subsidized loans and tax exemptions for selected sectors. Even though the public celebrated these benefits one needs to realize that these will further deteriorate Pakistan’s financial health, because they create a burden that its decrepit tax machinery cannot shoulder through prudent revenue collection elsewhere.

For an efficient economic system, it is essential that prices be linked directly to costs. When underlying costs rise, as they do when international commodity prices increase, the government cannot insulate the populace from higher domestic prices without creating a higher debt burden for future generations. Insufficient tax collection from broad swathes of the economy and a lack of productivity relative to other countries are at the core of our economy’s ailments. Either because of a lack of understanding amongst the top leadership or an unwillingness to start politically painful reforms.

Reducing petrol and electricity prices would trigger a deficit pile-up, which would be financed through more borrowing, which would further crowd-out private sector borrowing, and put upward pressure on interest rates. An already precarious fiscal balance would further deteriorate, while the ever-envied current account deficit would continue to widen.

Sehat Card
Despite the government’s tall claims, the Sehat Sahulat Programme (SSP) in Punjab has failed to achieve the desired targets. Under this health facility scheme, Insaf Sehat Cards had been issued to five million families in 36 districts of the province.

However, only 93,000 people could benefit from this facility within one year, making the success rate of the programme only two per cent.

Some top government officials as well as the provincial finance department have also expressed concerns regarding the success of the programme. According to sources, by the end of the financial year 2019, 11.03 billion had been spent on the scheme. In the current financial year, Rs12 billion has been allocated for this project.

What is more, the Punjab Health Insurance Initiative Management Company has demanded an additional Rs5 billion to sustain the Sehat Sahulat Programme.

Under the SSP, medical services can only be availed in case of hospitalisation, that too in a hospital included in the panel of the programme. At present, more than 200 hospitals across the province are on the panel, but only about 17 of them are government hospitals.

The programme does not include emergency and OPD facilities, which is why this facility has been largely useless for the masses. Government employees, journalists, and people belonging to some other professions were also suggested to be included in the programme, but the federal government did not agree.

The incompatibility of official rates and the market price of treatment, especially involving surgeries, points to the haste in rolling out Sehat Cards. It shows us that this was done prematurely and the required consensus among stakeholders was lacking. This has also exposed their inability to plug the loopholes in the system surfacing every now and then.

It is frequently stated that a Sehat Card offers coverage of up to Rs 1 million a year, yet it actually provides Rs 460,000 per family per year. The coverage is extendable to up to Rs1 million under special circumstances.

Under Package-I, priority disease treatment, all cardholders are allotted Rs 400,000 per family per year. This package covers treatment for certain specific types of diseases including heart disease, chronic diseases like tuberculosis, hepatitis-B and C, HIV, chronic liver disease, dialysis, burns and accidents, chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy for cancer, neurosurgical procedures and treatment for organ failure.

Under Package-II, secondary care treatment, the cardholders are eligible to receive up to Rs60,000 coverage per family per year. The package covers all types of medical and surgical illnesses and maternity services including C-section.

Ehsaas Card Program
The Ehsaas card program was just a rebranding of BISP. It is laden with the same problems that its predecessor. The Ehsaas card program expanded on the BISP and added seven million more families vs what was included in BISP. However, lack of proper management has resulted in issues for those trying to collect the funds.

News reports from various outlets cover the troubles faced by those trying to collect money from the Ehsaas program. There are reports about people not receiving their funds, about biometric issues at cash points and all in all mismanagement of the program resulting in the people not receiving the aid they were promised.

Imports vs Exports
I don't need a write-up here. I think the below graph clearly illustrates the problem faced by Pakistan

View attachment 115624

Debt
I will copy/paste what I have posted a few times already on this forum with regards to the debt accumulated by PTI during its 3 year tenure

According to State Bank of Pakistan, Pakistan's total external debt and liabilities in 2018 were 29,861.2 Billion Rs. (https://www.sbp.org.pk/reports/stat_...ternalDebt.pdf). This has increased to 51,724.2 Billion Rs in December 2021 (https://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/Summary.pdf).

The average USD rate in 2018 was 121.57. Using this rate, to make the aforementioned amounts currency neutral, we had a debt of $245B when Imran Khan took over and this amount (using the same conversation rate) stands at $425B.

So in the three years PTI's government ruled the country out total debt and liabilities according to State Bank of Pakistan almost doubled.

Out of this, the external debt stood at $99.238B and currently stands at $130B (as of last quarter of 2021) (https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/external-debt). That's a 31% increase in 3 years. If you have an issue with the quoted source, you can use the SBP summaries I referenced above to cross-check these amounts.

Thank you for the detailed review of the PTI government. I wonder how this party still gets support from literate Pakistanis who spent most of their last 4 years under PTI government, because from the looks of it, they did not deliver what they promised when the economy was in a better shape in 2018. Instead it got even worse. When I ask most of the PTI supporters in my circle to tell me about a couple of things that got better under this government, they go blank and their answer is like Imran Khan is so much better than other corrupt politicians. I mean most of the Pakistanis do not have corruption cases on them, so are we supposed to select every non-corrupt Pakistani as our leader? No, we can only select someone as our leader who is competent at the top level and can deliver goods for us which IK has shown that he is not capable of that yet.

Use case:

1- If I am a competent child / student but I steal 20 rupees every time from my parent's money when I go out to buy something them, it's corruption, but they can bear that. I'll get some scolding time to time, but they will be happy with me due to my competency.

2- I am a clean child, but very incompetent student. I do not get good grades. And that's why my parents will not be happy with me most of the times.

I am not supporting or promoting corruption here, but just pointing out that incompetence is a bigger curse when you are the hope of people around you.
 
How PTI failed Balochistan

The Baloch students hoped for standardization of the educational institutions of Balochistan; they expected more scholarships within and outside Pakistan, but were eventually made to struggle in maintaining their previously given seats in the institutions of Punjab; cancellation of reserved seats of Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU) Multan was one such ‘gift’. The Baloch students of BZU Multan were compelled to organize a barefoot long march from Multan to Lahore when their seats were ingested in the varsity, and the premier and his party leader in the Punjab, Usman Buzdar – also a Baloch – were indifferent about the issue.

On the other hand, enforced disappearance has been a long-lasting issue in Balochistan where a large number of men, women, the elderly and children are forcibly disappeared and detained. Prior to him being elected as the Prime Minister of the country, Khan was reported to have raised the issue of missing persons in serious terms in news talk shows, during his election campaign and in his ‘dharna’ against Mian Mohammad Nawaz Sharif back in 2015-16.

After he came into power in 2018, he had a bill introduced for criminalizing the enforced disappearances, but the Minister for Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Shireen Mazari, was found saying in a statement that the ‘bill for criminalizing enforced disappearances had gone ‘missing’, leaving the country in shock – particularly Balochistan where enforced disappearance has become a sickening norm.

The grieving families of missing persons of Balochistan turned to Islamabad’s D-Chowk after they found no serious and concrete moves by the PTI government in their case other than the formation of a commission to hear the cases of missing persons, but instead, “threatened the families not to appear before the commission”.

When the families reached there in the federal capital in February 2021, they were called on by the PM to meet on March 15 (2021) after several days and nights of the continuous sit-in. When the due date reached, PM was nowhere on the scene using the “delay tactic” of ignoring the grave issue of the Baloch missing persons.

A rapid increase in inflation has resulted in cries of poverty by the Baloch inhabitants. Despite being the richest province of the country in terms of mineral wealth and a very thin population of 12.34 million people, Balochistan is the poorest in the region when it comes to per capita income (PCI).
 
Reko Diq "Victory"

The so called Reko Diq victory which is being celebrated by PTI and it's fan is a sham. All in all, Pakistan had to pay a $6 billion fine for not continuing with the previous agreement. Imran Khan reached a new agreement whereby the fine would be off-set but instead the mine would be shared 50/50 by the mining company and the government of Pakistan.

Let's get into the details on the numbers, shall we? Reko Diq is one of the largest undeveloped copper and gold deposits in the world, capable of producing 200,000 tons of copper and 250,000 ounces of gold a year for more than half a century.

At current prices, that means we should be able to generate revenues of $489mn from Gold and over $2bn from copper. This is annual revenue. Over the course of 50 years the revenue generated from this mine, in total, would be $125 billion. Instead of coming to a negotiation on paying the $6bn fine we have handed away $62.5bn
 
I think Imran Khan has perhaps had the toughest stint as a leader in decades. He's had to deal with a global pandemic which led to huge inflation like most places around the world. He's had to deal with the Americans who had to retreat from Afghanist no doubt not having bases in Pakistan had a huge say on that. He's then had to deal with the fuel and food shortages that are now starting to affect everyone.

I think we must factor those things in when we analyse his tenure.
 
I think Imran Khan has perhaps had the toughest stint as a leader in decades. He's had to deal with a global pandemic which led to huge inflation like most places around the world. He's had to deal with the Americans who had to retreat from Afghanist no doubt not having bases in Pakistan had a huge say on that. He's then had to deal with the fuel and food shortages that are now starting to affect everyone.

I think we must factor those things in when we analyze his tenure.

My analysis hasn't included any commentary on economy not influenced by decisions made by the government itself. I wanted to expose the lies about how great our economy is doing because we increased exports (which is true) but at the same time imports increased at a greater rate impacting the balance of payments deficit.

I commented on the economic reliefs that were offered during his government which will result in us not being able to meet IMF conditions and putting us in a very dangerous situation in the coming months. I commented on how much loan his government has taken to fund its failed programs (not forgetting the fact that there has not been a single major development project undertaken during this time).

inflation, rising oil prices and covid impacts on economy are not even discussed
 
One of the greatest moves Imran Khan made was making a trade deal with the Russians which would have dealt with the incoming shortage of fuel and food that will hit everywhere. Pakistan had a great chance of coping. But this regime change has left us in a very bad situation. Economists and industrial leaders keep telling us that later this year the food and energy shortages will impact the entire world on an unprecedented scale. Ukraine and Russia are some the largest exporters of wheat in the world.

When the common man struggles to put food on the table then you're going to rue not cementing these deals with Russia.
 
Hi tenure is very much similar to that of Donald Trump.

Both have charismatic personality, both from non-political background, their fans love them blindly, both promised much in election rallies but actual performance was mostly restricted to twitter. Both got unceremoniously and prematurely ousted from office within 4 years. Trump blamed foreign hand in election rigging which led to his ouster and Imran is also blaming foreign hand for his removal. Both tried to instigate their fans using social media knowing they have lost democratically. Trump Supporters swarmed the Capitol Hill and protests in other parts of USA. We see similar protests by PTI supporters across Pakistan. Now Trump want to president again in 2024 and so does Imran who wants to become PM again.

Carbon Copy :)
 
One of the greatest moves Imran Khan made was making a trade deal with the Russians which would have dealt with the incoming shortage of fuel and food that will hit everywhere. Pakistan had a great chance of coping. But this regime change has left us in a very bad situation. Economists and industrial leaders keep telling us that later this year the food and energy shortages will impact the entire world on an unprecedented scale. Ukraine and Russia are some the largest exporters of wheat in the world.

When the common man struggles to put food on the table then you're going to rue not cementing these deals with Russia.

Please stop spreading misinformation.

Imran Khan did nothing to deal with incoming shortage of fuel and food. The Pakistan-Russia gas pipeline has been in discussion since 2015. This is called the Pakistan Stream gas project.

Here's a timeline for the events that have unfolded so far

- In 2015, Russia and Pakistan agreed in principle to build a 1,100 km (683 mile)-long pipeline to deliver imported Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) from Karachi on the Arabian Sea coast to power plants in the northeastern province of Punjab.

The pipeline's designed annual capacity stands at 12.4 billion cubic metres (bcm), with the possibility to be increased to 16 bcm.

- The cost will require investments of between $1.5 billion, according to Russia, to as much as $3.5 billion, estimated by Pakistan, with 26% of it to be financed by Moscow and the remaining 74% by Islamabad.

- The project was to be launched in 2020, but Russia had to replace the initial participant after the company was hit by western sanctions not related to the Pakistan Stream project.

Currently the pipeline, a rare example of Russian participation without state gas company Gazprom , involves the Eurasian Pipeline Consortium, steel pipe maker TMK, which produces steel pipelines for the energy sector, and Operational Services Centre run by the Russian Energy Ministry. Russian shareholders expect to return their investments from gas shipping fees.

- Currently, feasibility studies are taking place on the project but there is no firm date set for the launch. According to Russian media reports, shareholder agreement for the Pakistan Stream should be signed this month.

- On May 28, 2021, Russian Energy Minister Nikolai Shulginov and Pakistan's ambassador in Moscow Shafqat Ali Khan signed an agreement on behalf of their countries to build the Pakistan Stream gas pipeline.
 
On the import/export, the trend isn’t too surprising given how many stocks and ETF’s have followed the same pattern as a result of the pandemic. However, the last 12 months or so don’t look good with the exports falling below the imports - what has driven this ? it is no doubt below par although this struggle is visible everywhere now
 
IK government is leaving the country with $12 billions of central bank reserves, just 2 months of import cover.

The market and public sentiments worsened and the central bank’s reserves fell below the $12 billion mark — just above the level in the 2018 crisis or less than two months of import cover — as the increasing trade gap took a toll on reserves amid widening current account deficit and higher debt payments. The fall in reserves has been rather higher than before, an $8bn fall since August 2021 when it stood well over $20bn.

Source: https://www.dawn.com/news/1684358
 
Railways condition deteriorated under PTI govt’s watch

In more than three years of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government, two ministers took the helm of the Pakistan Railways but the department continued to pile up losses, according to a forensic audit report of Auditor General of Pakistan.

The railways saw two ministers as its head after the PTI came to power – Sheikh Rashid and Azam Swati. But during their tenures, junior officers were given key posts and important tasks, as a result the losses could not be curtailed, while the number of accidents also rose.

At one point during Sheikh Rashid’s tenure, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) got active and sought reply from a former DS Munawar Shah on complaints of bogus recruitment in the Rawalpindi division, however, the officer was sent to another department on deputation.

Also during the last three years, at least 135 train accidents occurred, including a fire incident onboard Tezgam that killed 75 passengers. Another major accident occurred in the tenure of Azam Swati, when two trains collided in Sukkur division, killing 70 people.

During Swati’s tenure, more than 400 employees were dismissed from the department, while a large number of officers were recruited from the private sector on huge salaries. Both the minister saw no recruitment to the Railways police, amid efforts to abolish the department.

Read More: Pakistan Railways asked to revamp strategy

The forensic audit report puts the total operational deficit of the railways during the last 9 years Rs333.81 billion, while the government subsidies during that period rose from Rs23 to 45 billion annually.

It was pointed out that during Rashid’s tenure, a junior officer was assigned the important post of senior general manager, having responsibility of the railways operations. However, due to his inexperience and lack of work experience on the operation set, 135 train accidents occurred.

Also during Rashid’s tenure, NAB sprung into action on the revelation of bogus recruitment, however, the officer was sent on deputation to the Capital Development Authority (CDA). The rolling stocks of the railways worth tens of millions of rupees were also lost.

After Rashid was replaced by Senator Swati, an army of private sector employees were appointed as officers on huge salaries in order to privatise the railways. Besides, junior and weak officers were given important posts.

As a result, despite increase in the fares, passengers could not get any better travel facilities. Despite a lack of staff in all the eight divisions of Railways, technical and non-technical employees were not recruited, instead the workload was dumped on the remaining staff.

During Sawati’s tenure, efforts were made to abolish the Railway Police – an important section of the department. During that period, the inspector general of the Railway Police did not provide funds to further improve the performance of Railway Police.

Source: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2352144/railways-condition-deteriorated-under-pti-govts-watch
 
At least Imran Khan is not corrupt

Adding on further to my comments above about the issues in Punjab and the involvement of PTI leaders in the sugar crisis, I have a few more points to make about the alleged corruption of PTI.

Have we forgotten how Imran Khan used the courts to legalize Bani Gala while in his tenure kachi abadi's in Islamabad and Karachi were grazed to the ground? Imran Khan's house falls in sub-zone B of zone IV, where construction took place without permission from the authority. The commission formed by the federal government in 2019 approved new regulations, which paved the way for regularization of Imran Khan's house.

Nasla Tower in Karachi was demolished because it was deemed to be illegally constructed whereas, Grand Hyatt Building which was also deemed to be illegally constructed was allowed to continue because apartments in this building were owned by high-profile buyers like Imran Khan and Abdul Hafeez Pasha, a close friend of Imran Khan.

There are no allegations of corruption on Imran Khan
Another lie peddled by his followers. Ignoring the fact that there are NAB cases pending in Punjab on Buzdar and the fact that corruption happened under his own watchful eye and he took no action to stop this, there are also corruption allegations on Imran Khan himself.

Javed Hashmi, a former president of PTI, accused Imran Khan of working along with the army to bring down democracy.

Aleem Khan, a former close ally of Imran Khan and one of the main financers of his party, has also accused him of corruption. Aleem Khan's claims are to do with the fact that in Punjab corruption was rampant and Imran Khan knowingly did not get involved in stopping it which means he was aiding the corruption. Moreover, I've already mentioned the sugar crisis and the involvement of PTI in making this happen via subsidies and "incorrect" stock counts to help their financer Jehangir Tareen earn back his money.

Other former PTI members who have accused Khan of corruption include Ahmed Jawad, former information secretary of PTI. Tariq Banuri who was illegally removed from his position of chairman HEC by Imran Khan before being reinstating by the courts claimed that he was removed by Imran because he was against Ata Ur Rehman's corruption in HEC

Tax Amnesty Scheme
Let's not forget that the government that wanted to root our corruption and spoke about Insaaf ran the longest even tax amnesty scheme for black money in the history of Pakistan.
 
Back
Top