Bhaag Viru Bhaag
T20I Star
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2013
- Runs
- 30,684
There could be 3-4 reasons in my opinion :Why did they change it here?Should have backed Saha no
a) They wanted a scapegoat after 36 all out
b) They wanted to protect Pant from day night test
c) After picking 5 bowlers, they needed someone who can bat a bit better than Saha and didn't give a damn about his keeping
If Cummins go on to make 50-60 runs and help Australia win then they will drop Pant again because he will be criticised for his keeping by everyone. My point is Saha was preferred for his keeping and is a average batsman but if he doesn't contribute with the gloves then he won't stay in the team for long.
What's your opinion?




