Kamran Akmal
6 matches 458 runs Ave 76.33 SR 100.43
Akbar ur rehman
6 matches 331 runs Ave 165.50 SR 97.64
Fakhar Zaman
3 matches 288 runs Ave 144.00 SR 97.29
Owais Rehman I
4 matches 239 runs Ave 239 SR 116.01
Mohammad Nawaz
3 matches 228 runs Ave 114 SR 121.92
Abdul Rehman Muhammad
3 matches 222 runs Ave 74 SR 106.73
Asif Zakir
2 matches 200 runs Ave 200 SR 105.26
For me top 5 of these batsman in descending order are :
1. Fakhar Zaman
2. Mohammad Nawaz
3. Akbar ur Rehman
4. Abdul Rehman Muzammil.
5. Asif Zakir
1. Fakhar Zaman is replacement of Ahmed Shehzad in Odis and T20 averages 55.07 at a strike rate of 97.47 in list A cricket and averages 40 and 31 with SR of 66.40 and 133.70 in Fc and T20.
Nauman Anwar is a better replacement of Ahmed Shehzad in T20 cricket than Fakhar and can make odi team too with a good season.
2. Abdul Rehman Muzammil averages 59.62 in list A cricket with a SR of 94.08. He is an ideal replacement of Sohaib Maqsood in playing eleven. Just an info he is fiance of Sana Mir pakistan women cricket team captain and he is also from Multan like Sohaib. Soon he will be in pakistan A squad and deserves to be. I hope selectors don't treat him like shehzad azam rana and Sadaf hussain.
3. Mohammad Nawaz is an ideal backup of Imad Wasim and is a finished product.
4. Akbar ur Rehman has a list A average of 46.65 at a SR of 85.76. He is 32 and he is not needed in pakistan A team. He can be replacement or backup of Mohammad Rizwan incase his game against spin bowling doesn't improve. Don't want to lose a brilliant athlete and fielder Rizwan in odi cricket so want him to work on his technique especially against short pitch fast bowling above fast medium speeds and against all types of Spin bowling.
5. Asif Zakir is backup of Mohammad Hafeez as an opener on Odi tours of England , South Africa , Australia and South Africa.
kamran is way ahead of everyone else, and if you account for butt's couple of no's, it puts him even farther ahead. thats just reading from the stats, and i havent seen the other players youve quoted.
fakhar looks to have started his career very well indeed, but 771 LA career runs is too small a number to draw any conclusions for me, short of him being some warner type prodigy. that said, im happy with anyone for shehzad. ive been trying to follow nauman anwar quite closely since his t20 heroics last year, but ive not noticed him doing very well. i htink you have to be carful with looking at averages when the sample size is less than ten or so, since no's have such a huge impact on the numbers. thats why although its crossing formats, kamran's 60 average in the QEA trophy with only 1 no in his 9 innings i figure ought to be taken into account as a measure of form too.
muhammad nawaz seems to have decent stats, and as for your comparison to imad wasim, its very interesting - he seems a better batsman, but imad seems to be a slightly better bowler - i think economy is a good measure of accuracy which is far more important in my estimation in the jump to international level cricket. but he seems a better bat at the same if not better sr, the only thing going against him is that he has ten less LA games of experience, which is not much in absolute terms, but probably worth noting in a career of 33 innings.
cant disagree with your analysis on akbar ur rehman. its such a tragedy that the pcb cant even seem to be able to produce statistics for list a games which are easily navigable so that we can compare like for like.
on abdul rehman muzammil, isnt impossible to say? hes only played 9 LA innings, its too risky to extrapolate that, no matter how well he does. i would have thought he needs to perform consistently for a little while longer before it can be ascertained whether he is class or is going through a purple patch.
asif zakir - no real comment. cant see his strike rate, although a 46 average over 58 games is excellent. id still rather have alam in as a permanent fixture in odis and tests, would be happy to try some of these other newer players, but whoever they pick, they a) should be clear they have performed for a while consistently and b) will need to give them several series to play irrespective of performance. but obviously neither of those will happen.
on current form, i still think kamran should be considered, although i wont be annoyed if he isnt.
amongst the bowlers, sadaf hussain stands out for me again, although theres a left arm spinner who has a couple of more wickets so far - sadaf stands out for me just because of his consistency. - See more at:
http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...p-Update-Post-346/page6&p=8339145#post8339145
Sadaf hussain 6 matches 15 wickets
Shehzad Azam Rana 5 matches 15 wickets
Bilawal 6 arches 14 wickets
Zohaib Sheran 4 matches 12 wickets
Hasan Ali 4 matches 4 wickets
Sadaf Shehzad Bilawal Zohaib Hasan
Av 15.6 15.86 17.42 14.16 17.58
SR 21.4 17.60 18.80 16.00 21.90
Eco 4.36 5.40 5.54 5.31 4.81
4fer 1 2 1 1 1
5fer 1 0 0 1 0
All are very close cannot single out any one yet at this stage of tournament.