shahidafridi123
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2011
- Runs
- 9,633
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
fine commentator
whats wrong with him?
why facepalm
What's wrong with him? Maybe that he can't actually string a sentence together.
He is a lot worse than the some of the worst ie Kumble, Gavaskar, Ramiz etc
You can make a point about Gavaskar being biased..but he is a very good commentator. And often gives great insights too
Kumble and Ramiz are not bad either...
Jayasurya is a whole different level..
why dnt you try this urself
You can make a point about Gavaskar being biased..but he is a very good commentator. And often gives great insights too
Kumble and Ramiz are not bad either...
Jayasurya is a whole different level..
the best bit is when he's in the middle of his story, he'd stop and say the score at the end of the over. After the break, a new story has already started and ends in the same abrupt fashion.
Kids dont remember 92 WC. He was the only one who kept backing us when we were on the brink of going out.
In the semi when Malik got out 90% of Pakistan thought that was it but SG kept saying Pakistan will go through.
What's your point, just because a commentator backs Pakistan that means he is good?
What's that supposed to mean?
Sanath Jayasuriya: "The Sri Lanka is in the trouble...... deep one....... The (Kumar) Sangakkara has to long bat" (actually trying to say "has to bat long" ).
He is a lot worse than the some of the worst ie Kumble, Gavaskar, Ramiz etc
How is Ramiz Raja worst??
Seems to be a good commentator. Good English is not the main prerequisite to become a commentator. You need to have a good understanding of the game, and this Jayasuriya does have.
Why so much hate for Ramiz.
He is the best commentator that Pak produced.
Yer, sanath is too dry.
I disagree.
The commentator's understanding needs to be properly articulated otherwise the listeners/viewers won't comprehend the point being made.
Half the job is knowledge the other half is the actually speaking bit when it comes to commentary.
It's a tough job, but Sanath isn't cut out for it, IMO.
he's not funny, it's just all over the place. now he just said that it was too close to cut when the ball was two feet outside off stump
the best bit is when he's in the middle of his story, he'd stop and say the score at the end of the over. After the break, a new story has already started and ends in the same abrupt fashion.
Kids dont remember 92 WC. He was the only one who kept backing us when we were on the brink of going out.
In the semi when Malik got out 90% of Pakistan thought that was it but SG kept saying Pakistan will go through.
he is good ... he may be slow... so what.. he is new... it will take time... how was these so called great commentators when they came first?....
his english is fine.... with time he wil get better ..
soon he will smoke every one here for sixes like he use 2 do when batting
Kids dont remember 92 WC. He was the only one who kept backing us when we were on the brink of going out.
In the semi when Malik got out 90% of Pakistan thought that was it but SG kept saying Pakistan will go through.
the the the the the the..
That's all he says.
^
The dream team of cricket commentary?
Mahela isa vary backward to the junaid and the important point izz that a pakistanis is.. its 297/5
and youre waiting for what so important and..
the sangakarra will not lost the wickut today..
one very very confused man that, If only he.... it 4.26 am here on the 26th.
Sanath come back, we miss you!
Sanath come back, we miss you!