Shahid Afridi appointed interim Chair of the Selection Committee for New Zealand series

Is appointing Shahid Afridi as Chief Selector a good decision?


  • Total voters
    29
Mir Hamza is a good selection. Would have picked Zafar over Sajid and Sameen over Dhani. Needed an extra batter ahead of many pseudoallrounders.

One good thing is Shahid Afridi(as interim CS)isn't a guy who can be bullied into selecting what others (chairman or captain) want to.

But the squad needs to be trimmed so that 5-6 players can go and play ongoing domestic cricket.
 
Haroon Rasheed??
Is he still alive?

What’s the deal in Intikhab Alam? Is he still part of PCB or he can’t function anymore due to old age?
 
As I explained three times, it has nothing to do with talent. Talent or no talent, a professional cricketer deserves to be employed by his cricket board.

PCB has a duty of care towards all professional cricketers in Pakistan not just those who are international material.

Just because a player is not good enough for international cricket it doesn’t mean he should be put out to pasture.

No. PCB does not have this duty.
Nowhere has it been mentioned in their charter.

And this is quite an idiotic logic to begin with.
PCB does NOT have unlimited funds to recruits and spoon fed retired players. No organization does that.

PCB, can introduce a pension plan for players who served for a certain amount of time. And this pension should be allocated/subtracted in small portions from thir current pay structure.

So far as the hiring goes, PCB should hire people only and only by merit. Whether it’s a former player or not, should not have any bearing on the hiring decision - otherwise if PCB starts hiring people JUST BECAUSE or MAINLT BECAUSE he is a former player then PCB will become a combination of a zoo and a circus - that it currently is.

If a former players wants to seek an open position at PCB then he must get sufficient training, certification, and meet the experience level required by the job, and compete in the open merit based competition As simple as that.
 
That is nonsense. PIA is overmanned by 1000s, by some estimates by 8000, and the same with PSM, an organisation bankrupted by your crooks. Did anyone get phased out? And look how they got the jobs? Through safarish off course. This was the same in cricket. Your arguments make no sense, are hotch potch of confused political agendas that end up confusing you more than the reader.

I asked for names. Please give me the names.
Please list the players who played FC as a favor by the higher ups.

Let’s see how long they played & what was their record & what percentage of the total FC players do they make up.

You sound confident that you know what you are talking about so let’s see the names. Generic rambling doesn’t help. I’m waiting.
 
No. PCB does not have this duty.
Nowhere has it been mentioned in their charter.

And this is quite an idiotic logic to begin with.
PCB does NOT have unlimited funds to recruits and spoon fed retired players. No organization does that.

PCB, can introduce a pension plan for players who served for a certain amount of time. And this pension should be allocated/subtracted in small portions from thir current pay structure.

So far as the hiring goes, PCB should hire people only and only by merit. Whether it’s a former player or not, should not have any bearing on the hiring decision - otherwise if PCB starts hiring people JUST BECAUSE or MAINLT BECAUSE he is a former player then PCB will become a combination of a zoo and a circus - that it currently is.

If a former players wants to seek an open position at PCB then he must get sufficient training, certification, and meet the experience level required by the job, and compete in the open merit based competition As simple as that.

Retired from international cricket or retired from FC cricket? Cook retired from England in 2018 but he is still employed by his County.

People need to separate international cricket & domestic cricket. Providing players for international cricket is one of the things that domestic cricket achieves, it is not the only purpose.

Please try to understand this. Domestic cricket is part of professional cricket & international cricket is the highest level of professional cricket. It is not the only level of professional cricket.

Hawai firing does not help. Be practical. You cannot leave thousands of FC unemployed just because they are not international material. If they are good enough for FC level, they deserve to be employed because they are good enough to be professional cricketers.

Players who don’t perform in FC cricket are eventually phased out or they retire anyway. It is the natural cycle.
 
If Mir Hamza is a test bowler than I will eat my hat. Dahani has potential but has been poor lately, pace is down and the nip has gone. And Sajid, well what can I say.

To be fair, I don't what are the other options people keep talking about. Mubasir ahead of Sajid is a good call but I'm not sure what seamers Pakistan have available . Umer perhaps?
 
Retired from international cricket or retired from FC cricket? Cook retired from England in 2018 but he is still employed by his County.

People need to separate international cricket & domestic cricket. Providing players for international cricket is one of the things that domestic cricket achieves, it is not the only purpose.

Please try to understand this. Domestic cricket is part of professional cricket & international cricket is the highest level of professional cricket. It is not the only level of professional cricket.

Hawai firing does not help. Be practical. You cannot leave thousands of FC unemployed just because they are not international material. If they are good enough for FC level, they deserve to be employed because they are good enough to be professional cricketers.

Players who don’t perform in FC cricket are eventually phased out or they retire anyway. It is the natural cycle.

I don’t think they got on their knees and presented the job in a platter to Cook. And even if they did, what about 100’s of other retired professional English cricketers? Are they all given Employement under the umbrella of ECB?

I have to research but in my opinion, it was probably an open position that Cook applied to, and he met the requirements to land on the job.
There is no free platter in the western world that you are trying to copy.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I am pleased to announce that 3 more players Shahnawaz Dhani, Mir Hamza and Sajid Khan have been added to strengthen the squad for the first test match. We are here to support the captain so he may have more option at his disposal&#55356;&#56821;&#55356;&#56816; <a href="https://t.co/yrCHdEXdzG">https://t.co/yrCHdEXdzG</a></p>— Shahid Afridi (@SAfridiOfficial) <a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial/status/1606691657570738177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 24, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Abdul Razzaq is happy!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">On way to Karachi with Lala ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SAfridiOfficial</a>⁩ <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PakvsNZ?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PakvsNZ</a> <a href="https://t.co/naEVNM7aWa">pic.twitter.com/naEVNM7aWa</a></p>— Abdul Razzaq (@ARazzaqPak) <a href="https://twitter.com/ARazzaqPak/status/1606918259785469954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 25, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
I don’t think they got on their knees and presented the job in a platter to Cook. And even if they did, what about 100’s of other retired professional English cricketers? Are they all given Employement under the umbrella of ECB?

I have to research but in my opinion, it was probably an open position that Cook applied to, and he met the requirements to land on the job.
There is no free platter in the western world that you are trying to copy.

Cook still plays for Essex.
 
Not see this before - Checking with Chief Selector before finalizing XI?


Babar Azam in presser:

"We haven’t finalised the playing XI. We will do that after discussion with the chief selector [Shahid Afridi], who will meet us today. We will try to select the best possible XI"

“Yes, we had a discussion on it [inclusion of three additional players]. Obviously, they have their own mindset. I gave them my opinion and, in the end, we did what was best for our side"
 
Last edited:
Not see this before - Checking with Chief Selector before finalizing XI?


Babar Azam in presser:

"We haven’t finalised the playing XI. We will do that after discussion with the chief selector [Shahid Afridi], who will meet us today. We will try to select the best possible XI"

“Yes, we had a discussion on it [inclusion of three additional players]. Obviously, they have their own mindset. I gave them my opinion and, in the end, we did what was best for our side"

Yeah you don’t want to annoy the people of Pakistan anymore Babar.

Well done
 
Not see this before - Checking with Chief Selector before finalizing XI?


Babar Azam in presser:

"We haven’t finalised the playing XI. We will do that after discussion with the chief selector [Shahid Afridi], who will meet us today. We will try to select the best possible XI"

“Yes, we had a discussion on it [inclusion of three additional players]. Obviously, they have their own mindset. I gave them my opinion and, in the end, we did what was best for our side"

Finally, a group of people told him that he no longer has imperial authority over the squad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The raub of Afridi

Never would we hear Babar say “we will decide the playing XI when Muhammad Wasim reaches Karachi”
 
The raub of Afridi

Never would we hear Babar say “we will decide the playing XI when Muhammad Wasim reaches Karachi”

Yes - crystal clear who is calling the shots now.

To be fair, Babar was given that authority but he failed to make good use of it.
 
After making poor selections for the 3 tests Babar cannot be trusted with selection of final 11. If he fails this series as well he will be for certain removed from captaincy.
 
Babar in his press conference responded to the question of Mir Hamza playing the first Test by saying ‘I haven’t decided the final XI’, but his tone wasn’t very encouraging

I hope this guy doesn’t make it an personal ego issue by keeping Hamza out.
 
Abdul Razzaq is happy!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">On way to Karachi with Lala ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SAfridiOfficial</a>⁩ <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PakvsNZ?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PakvsNZ</a> <a href="https://t.co/naEVNM7aWa">pic.twitter.com/naEVNM7aWa</a></p>— Abdul Razzaq (@ARazzaqPak) <a href="https://twitter.com/ARazzaqPak/status/1606918259785469954?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 25, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The real Jay and Viru of Pakistan on their way to clean up this mess by Misbah-Saqlain-Ramiz-Muhammad Waseem-Rizwan
 
Babar in his press conference responded to the question of Mir Hamza playing the first Test by saying ‘I haven’t decided the final XI’, but his tone wasn’t very encouraging

I hope this guy doesn’t make it an personal ego issue by keeping Hamza out.

He should do what's best but I am guessing he will be told by Afridi and Razzaq when they arrive who to select.

His answer above seems more like one to try and give the impression that his opinion matters.
 
He should do what's best but I am guessing he will be told by Afridi and Razzaq when they arrive who to select.

His answer above seems more like one to try and give the impression that his opinion matters.

Yes, but his track record in this facet isn’t the best is it?

All cricketers, true experts of the game were pleading with this guy to bat at number 3 in the T20i World Cup. Did he listen?

Wasim Akram a certified legend and captain or Pakistan told him to bat at number 3 for Karachi kings but he didn’t listen.

This man gives you the impression that he just doesn’t listen for the sake of it!
 
Yes, but his track record in this facet isn’t the best is it?

All cricketers, true experts of the game were pleading with this guy to bat at number 3 in the T20i World Cup. Did he listen?

Wasim Akram a certified legend and captain or Pakistan told him to bat at number 3 for Karachi kings but he didn’t listen.

This man gives you the impression that he just doesn’t listen for the sake of it!

Remember he has to lead the team on the field. He needs to be convinced that each member in that XI is there for a reason or else he will not use his resources with conviction.
 
I asked for names. Please give me the names.
Please list the players who played FC as a favor by the higher ups.

Let’s see how long they played & what was their record & what percentage of the total FC players do they make up.

You sound confident that you know what you are talking about so let’s see the names. Generic rambling doesn’t help. I’m waiting.

Have a look at the stats of Shezar Mohammed or Anwar Miandad or Sagheer Abbas. Please put their stats on here:)):)):)):)):)):)):))
Before you argue with do some research.
 
To be fair, I don't what are the other options people keep talking about. Mubasir ahead of Sajid is a good call but I'm not sure what seamers Pakistan have available . Umer perhaps?

The option was to go left field and go for Ihsanullah, but Hamza is what can best be described as solid FC bowler. Nothing bad
 
Why can't they drop Hasan Ali, Zahid Mehmood and Wasim Jr? They could add Salauddin, Huraira and Mubasshir
 
Have a look at the stats of Shezar Mohammed or Anwar Miandad or Sagheer Abbas. Please put their stats on here:)):)):)):)):)):)):))
Before you argue with do some research.

So you came up with 3 names over a period of 70+ years. You have more smilies than names in your posts.

I expected this to happen. You talked big but came up with nothing.
 
I don’t think they got on their knees and presented the job in a platter to Cook. And even if they did, what about 100’s of other retired professional English cricketers? Are they all given Employement under the umbrella of ECB?

I have to research but in my opinion, it was probably an open position that Cook applied to, and he met the requirements to land on the job.
There is no free platter in the western world that you are trying to copy.

There are hundreds of professional cricketers in County who will never be good enough to play for England.

Maybe ECB should follow the Pakistan model, reduce teams to 6 to improve competitiveness & throw away all these professional players.

By your logic, Cook should not be getting paid by the Counties because he already retired from England & he is taking up the spot of a potential future England player.

The problem with Pakistani fans is that they think they are the only geniuses in the room who have cracked the golden formula of less teams = more quality.
 
Afridi as a chief selector, is going to be interesting, espically when it comes to the white ball team, however will he do a good job, a great job, or a horrible job, only time will tell.

I was a big fan of Afridi growing up, but I realized he is not the smartest guy out their, he wont take any ** which is a good thing, but can be hard to see how things pan out, I think he will be okay to decent as a selectors, I hope he can be great, do not see it happening.
 
Afridi has no experience outside of being an international player. Why is everyone going gaga over him?
 
Afridi has no experience outside of being an international player. Why is everyone going gaga over him?

Because he is a big name and apparently that is all you need for people to be hyped.

Most likely, he will be a disaster like every other prominent former player that has been coach or selector.
 
Not see this before - Checking with Chief Selector before finalizing XI?


Babar Azam in presser:

"We haven’t finalised the playing XI. We will do that after discussion with the chief selector [Shahid Afridi], who will meet us today. We will try to select the best possible XI"

“Yes, we had a discussion on it [inclusion of three additional players]. Obviously, they have their own mindset. I gave them my opinion and, in the end, we did what was best for our side"

Good. It’s clear you’re not good enough to choose XIs by yourself after 3 years in the game and so don’t deserve complete authority. It’s ok. Not everyone is meant for that kind of freedom in leadership. That’s why chief selector, coach roles exist to help you out.
 
There are hundreds of professional cricketers in County who will never be good enough to play for England.

Maybe ECB should follow the Pakistan model, reduce teams to 6 to improve competitiveness & throw away all these professional players.

By your logic, Cook should not be getting paid by the Counties because he already retired from England & he is taking up the spot of a potential future England player.

The problem with Pakistani fans is that they think they are the only geniuses in the room who have cracked the golden formula of less teams = more quality.

That's correct. Players who are good enough for domestic cricket but not good for International team provide guidance, experience and tough competition to youngsters entering into domestic cricket, they are the essential backbone of all the cricket boards domestic setup.

Boards also show that cricket is a viable career to kids and their parents by showing hundreds of players in the domestic setup earning good income. Ranji trophy/Vijay Hazare/Duleep/Deodhar/Irani/Syed Mustaq Ali trophy money is good enough to live a upper middle class lifestyle in India.
 
So you came up with 3 names over a period of 70+ years. You have more smilies than names in your posts.

I expected this to happen. You talked big but came up with nothing.


Pity your teacher. Utter humiliation. You asked for names and I gave them to you and now it's not enough. This is what happens when you get owned by me for not doing your homework:)):)):)):))
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are hundreds of professional cricketers in County who will never be good enough to play for England.

Maybe ECB should follow the Pakistan model, reduce teams to 6 to improve competitiveness & throw away all these professional players.

By your logic, Cook should not be getting paid by the Counties because he already retired from England & he is taking up the spot of a potential future England player.

The problem with Pakistani fans is that they think they are the only geniuses in the room who have cracked the golden formula of less teams = more quality.

There are 12 teams with paid players. At least get your basic sums right.
 
Another tumultuous reign to begin on one hand is egoistic lunacy driven self obsessed chief and their 50s era convenor add to it one misogynistic fella and one invisible character, the merry go round aka cirkus &#55356;&#57258; in Pakistan Cricket continues
 
Pity your teacher. Utter humiliation. You asked for names and I gave them to you and now it's not enough. This is what happens when you get owned by me for not doing your homework:)):)):)):))

Tsk. Don't you realise that you have to prove that what you are saying is correct and also provide proof that the other guy is wrong?

Otherwise, clearly you are wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hDJxMRd.png


In Karachi to watch Day 1
 
Pity your teacher. Utter humiliation. You asked for names and I gave them to you and now it's not enough. This is what happens when you get owned by me for not doing your homework:)):)):)):))

You came up with a grand total of three names out of thousands of FC cricketers that have played for Pakistan over 70+ years. That is not even 0.00001%.

For the second time, you have more emojis than names in your posts. The lack of depth in your argument was totally exposed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are 12 teams with paid players. At least get your basic sums right.

For the millionth time, having 6 teams per division is not the same as having 12 teams per division. Pakistan needs at least 20 total teams (10 per division). The current system is not sufficient to accommodate the second most populous country in the game & that has more professional cricketers than all other countries (except India combined).
 
For the millionth time, having 6 teams per division is not the same as having 12 teams per division. Pakistan needs at least 20 total teams (10 per division). The current system is not sufficient to accommodate the second most populous country in the game & that has more professional cricketers than all other countries (except India combined).

There are 12 teams with paid players. The rest is semantics
 
You came up with a grand total of three names out of thousands of FC cricketers that have played for Pakistan over 70+ years. That is not even 0.00001%.

For the second time, you have more emojis than names in your posts. The lack of depth in your argument was totally exposed.

Those were from my memory. You came up with criteria and now just tuss.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Pleased with Pakistan's performance today, great comeback after the early loss of wickets. Special praise for Babar for another outstanding innings. Sarfaraz proved his selection right, excellent performance for him under pressure.</p>— Shahid Afridi (@SAfridiOfficial) <a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial/status/1607355081359327233?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 26, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Interesting that it was Shahid Afridi who told Sarfaraz that he would be playing:

Sarfaraz Ahmed "I was so excited when I got to know about my comeback. Shahid Afridi texted me to let me know and I called him back. He gave me so much confidence. To be honest, I wasn't sure whether I would ever play my 50th Test match or not"
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">- Smart decision by Lala <a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SAfridiOfficial</a> to use <a href="https://twitter.com/SarfarazA_54?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SarfarazA_54</a> in test playing 11 today. I would suggest to use him in ODI's too as he is very handy in the middle overs, as the next white ball worldcup is around the corner. Good ton by <a href="https://twitter.com/babarazam258?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@babarazam258</a> too. <br>All the best boys !</p>— Shoaib Malik &#55356;&#56821;&#55356;&#56816; (@realshoaibmalik) <a href="https://twitter.com/realshoaibmalik/status/1607417275287732224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 26, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">- Smart decision by Lala <a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SAfridiOfficial</a> to use <a href="https://twitter.com/SarfarazA_54?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SarfarazA_54</a> in test playing 11 today. I would suggest to use him in ODI's too as he is very handy in the middle overs, as the next white ball worldcup is around the corner. Good ton by <a href="https://twitter.com/babarazam258?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@babarazam258</a> too. <br>All the best boys !</p>— Shoaib Malik &#55356;&#56821;&#55356;&#56816; (@realshoaibmalik) <a href="https://twitter.com/realshoaibmalik/status/1607417275287732224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 26, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

100% agreed

Sarfaraz can bat at 4 or 5 for Pakistan in the World Cup
 
Interesting that it was Shahid Afridi who told Sarfaraz that he would be playing:

Sarfaraz Ahmed "I was so excited when I got to know about my comeback. Shahid Afridi texted me to let me know and I called him back. He gave me so much confidence. To be honest, I wasn't sure whether I would ever play my 50th Test match or not"

I have a feeling very soon he will be again captain of Pakistan. There is definitely some long term planning behind his surprise selection. Babar will surely be removed after the NZ series.
 
Afridi was brainless cricketer and now a brainless selector. Circus full of clowns continues
 
I have a feeling very soon he will be again captain of Pakistan. There is definitely some long term planning behind his surprise selection. Babar will surely be removed after the NZ series.

Sarfraz + Mickey Arthur duo.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Very good initiative by <a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SAfridiOfficial</a> and the interim selection committee to attract youth in longer format of the game in the era of T20 and T10.This will definitely encourage youngsters to play red ball cricket which is the most important format for their development. <a href="https://t.co/QDNStZcnGE">https://t.co/QDNStZcnGE</a></p>— Misbah Ul Haq (@captainmisbahpk) <a href="https://twitter.com/captainmisbahpk/status/1607753458114871297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 27, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Very good initiative by <a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SAfridiOfficial</a> and the interim selection committee to attract youth in longer format of the game in the era of T20 and T10.This will definitely encourage youngsters to play red ball cricket which is the most important format for their development. <a href="https://t.co/QDNStZcnGE">https://t.co/QDNStZcnGE</a></p>— Misbah Ul Haq (@captainmisbahpk) <a href="https://twitter.com/captainmisbahpk/status/1607753458114871297?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 27, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Oh here we go

“Hey lala and PCB, I’m relevant too you know”
 
Shahid Afridi must stop talking about selection matters, policies and plans on twitter and with the media everyday. He should focus on work and wait for consistent results. No need to share daily report on selection matters
 
Mhd Wasim did a horrible job and him getting replaced after the recent results shouldn't raise any eyebrows. However, replacing him with a player who wouldn't have played half the number of games if he was not a Pakistani is an absolute joke.

Afridi and Razzak were never strategic thinkers - they always needed a strong captain to get the best out of them. How can they select a team based on a sound strategy? Afridi even left test captaincy midway a series :)))

Anyhow, anything that this tout Sethi does will only be done to undo what the previous regime did; such is his and his masters' mindset.
 
Shahid Afridi must stop talking about selection matters, policies and plans on twitter and with the media everyday. He should focus on work and wait for consistent results. No need to share daily report on selection matters

Trying too hard to justify his appointment. Wanting to come across as a hardworking and honest man. Only happens when you are insecure about your job and know that you've only gotten their because you towed the line of those incharge.
 
Trying too hard to justify his appointment. Wanting to come across as a hardworking and honest man. Only happens when you are insecure about your job and know that you've only gotten their because you towed the line of those incharge.

Shahid Afridi was always fond of being in media limelight even during his playing days. In his press conferences during playing days he was ill-tempered and used to give knee-jerk reactions. Don't remember how many times he retired and came back after having dispute with PCB. In his extremely long career the only valuable performance he had was in T20 WC 2009 in SF & final, apart from these 2 performances he failed on numerous big occasions.
I won't be surprised if he announce his resignation on twitter after few months
 
Shahid Afridi was always fond of being in media limelight even during his playing days. In his press conferences during playing days he was ill-tempered and used to give knee-jerk reactions. Don't remember how many times he retired and came back after having dispute with PCB. In his extremely long career the only valuable performance he had was in T20 WC 2009 in SF & final, apart from these 2 performances he failed on numerous big occasions.
I won't be surprised if he announce his resignation on twitter after few months

Player of The Tournament (wt20 -2007)

Most Wickets in a Tournament (WC - 2011)

ATG All round performance (70ish off 50 + 7-12 with ball)

There’s so much more I could add…
 
Player of The Tournament (wt20 -2007)

Most Wickets in a Tournament (WC - 2011)

ATG All round performance (70ish off 50 + 7-12 with ball)

There’s so much more I could add…

He played many games and made Pakistan loose so many. His performance that you outlined do not tell the true story of his poor career. Worst thing is that he ran away during a test series and retired. If Afridi didn't have good luck, he wouldn't have lasted a year playing for Pakistan. This is the true reality.
 
He played many games and made Pakistan loose so many. His performance that you outlined do not tell the true story of his poor career. Worst thing is that he ran away during a test series and retired. If Afridi didn't have good luck, he wouldn't have lasted a year playing for Pakistan. This is the true reality.

He lost you games from a losing position and he won you games from a losing position.


I don’t want to derail this thread but to say he lost us so many games and forget the games he won us just shows you how ungrateful our fanbase is.

They expected one man to carry a team, and because he couldn’t they all blamed him.


Why would that bother you if he ran away from a test series mid way, after all “he’s lost us so many games”.
 
Player of The Tournament (wt20 -2007)

Most Wickets in a Tournament (WC - 2011)

ATG All round performance (70ish off 50 + 7-12 with ball)

There’s so much more I could add…

This is nothing considering the amount of matches he played for Pakistan. He played many World Cups (ODIs &T20s) from 1999 to 2016 and his contribution was awful in several WCs. I agree he won some matches with his individual performances but he has very cleverly manipulated his entire career. He was neither a proper bowling allrounder nor he was a proper batting allrounder. When he used to fail with the bat he started calling himself bowler and when he failed with the bowl he considered himself as a batsman. He played for so many years in international cricket because of his strong brand in media and blind fan following. Even after 2016 he was not willing to retire gracefully and was asking for farewell match.
He threw his wicket on many key occasions with his brainless batting
 
You have to be a casual viewer of the game to suggest that Boom Boom was a positive influence with the bat for us. He probably caused more long-term damage to our cricket with his brainless batting than any other cricketer. Because he probably inspired a generation of mediocre young cricketers to think they could hack it by being just as brainless with the bat. And yeah, he lost us WAAAAY more games with the bat than he ever won.

He's a limited-overs legend for his exploits with the ball. But post-2006 he was garbage with the bat. More of a detriment to the side than any kind of a positive. Because no matter the situation, he always played the same way. People only remember the outstanding performances he gave in the 2009 T20 WC semi-final and final, the time he hammered Bangladesh in the Asia Cup or the time he hit Ashwin for six in the last over. What they don't remembers are the countless number of games in between where he threw his wicket away after playing some brainless shot. He was the type of batter that you could never rely on, and its funny that he is still celebrated by some for his signature brand of brainless batting. I guess some people really have been watching cricket with their eyes closed.

And by the looks of it, he has brought some of the same characteristics of his batting to his selection.
 
Last edited:
You have to be a casual viewer of the game to suggest that Boom Boom was a positive influence with the bat for us. He probably caused more long-term damage to our cricket with his brainless batting than any other cricketer. Because he probably inspired a generation of mediocre young cricketers to think they could hack it by being just as brainless with the bat. And yeah, he lost us WAAAAY more games with the bat than he ever won.

He's a limited-overs legend for his exploits with the ball. But post-2006 he was garbage with the bat. More of a detriment to the side than any kind of a positive. Because no matter the situation, he always played the same way. People only remember the outstanding performances he gave in the 2009 T20 WC semi-final and final, the time he hammered Bangladesh in the Asia Cup or the time he hit Ashwin for six in the last over. What they don't remembers are the countless number of games in between where he threw his wicket away after playing some brainless shot. He was the type of batter that you could never rely on, and its funny that he is still celebrated by some for his signature brand of brainless batting. I guess some people really have been watching cricket with their eyes closed.

And by the looks of it, he has brought some of the same characteristics of his batting to his selection.

Excellently put, much better than I could have.

In any other country he would been booted out, he also survived due to friendships with senior players and his looks giving him sponsorships. If he looked like Nauman Ali he wouldn't have lasted 10 games
 
He lost you games from a losing position and he won you games from a losing position.


I don’t want to derail this thread but to say he lost us so many games and forget the games he won us just shows you how ungrateful our fanbase is.

They expected one man to carry a team, and because he couldn’t they all blamed him.


Why would that bother you if he ran away from a test series mid way, after all “he’s lost us so many games”.

Afridi was the captain during the disasterous 2016 Asia Cup and 2016 T20 World Cup where we exited from group stages. He and Waqar played four seamers on a raging turner in Kolkata vs India.

He also persisted with tuktuks like Ahmed Shehzad, Khurram Manzoor, and gave 39 year old Rifatullah Mohmand a debut. He left the T20 side ranked 7th.

Now he, and his fellow culprit Haroon Rashid (the Chief Selector at the time and possibly our worst ever) are back on the selection panel ! What a country this is where failure is not only accepted but rewarded.
 
An intriguing choice as chief selector for sure.

Afridi had a lot of ups and downs in his career, but one thing that sticks in my head is when he retired from Test cricket in the middle of the series against Australia. (after being named captain.)

He should have seen out that series for me.
 
To all saying Afridi retired from a series Mid-way.

In hindsight he just knew about the fixing probably well before it was made public. He did already have his suspicions and must have known that dressing room with those
Crooks was a lost cause.

That retirement saved his career and name.

Imagine he was captaining that side which did the spot-fixing. We would have lost all internet in cricket by now.

Afridi is the equivalent to the Pakistani - Maradona!
 
The greatest player to have played for Pakistan in the last 20 years.

If he was starting his career in an era with 2 new balls, smaller boundaries, bigger bats, mediocre bowlers then we’d see him averaging close to 40 with a sr of 150+
 
Afridi was the captain during the disasterous 2016 Asia Cup and 2016 T20 World Cup where we exited from group stages. He and Waqar played four seamers on a raging turner in Kolkata vs India.

He also persisted with tuktuks like Ahmed Shehzad, Khurram Manzoor, and gave 39 year old Rifatullah Mohmand a debut. He left the T20 side ranked 7th.

Now he, and his fellow culprit Haroon Rashid (the Chief Selector at the time and possibly our worst ever) are back on the selection panel ! What a country this is where failure is not only accepted but rewarded.

At the end of his career, funny how no one talks about him taking us to SF of WC in 2011. The same would cup where he could’ve had Sachin’s wicket 4 times.

3 of the pacers done well that game which shows you the pitches weren’t bad for pace bowlers, you think India would struggle against spin?

Afridi wasn’t the chief selector, if those guys were being backed by Afridi that doesn’t mean the CS has to pick them.
 
At the end of his career, funny how no one talks about him taking us to SF of WC in 2011. The same would cup where he could’ve had Sachin’s wicket 4 times.

3 of the pacers done well that game which shows you the pitches weren’t bad for pace bowlers, you think India would struggle against spin?

Afridi wasn’t the chief selector, if those guys were being backed by Afridi that doesn’t mean the CS has to pick them.

Reaching SFs in 2011 in Asian conditions was par given our spin attack of Ajmal, Hafeez and Afridi himself.

Afridi may have reputation for being an "aggressive beast" but was timid and defensive as skipper. The batting combination was virtually identical to our Test XI with Shafiq, Younis and Misbah in the middle-order which was exposed in Mohali.

As for the bolded - surely the converse is true. Chief Selector can name whoever he wants, but the captain decides on the final XI. I still cannot understand the justification for playing Khurram Manzoor in T20s despite a SR around 110, playing Anwar Ali ahead of Aamer Yamin, or debuting 39 year old Rifatullah Mohmand. That guy's reflexes were so slow I thought my stream was buffering :))
 
Reaching SFs in 2011 in Asian conditions was par given our spin attack of Ajmal, Hafeez and Afridi himself.

Afridi may have reputation for being an "aggressive beast" but was timid and defensive as skipper. The batting combination was virtually identical to our Test XI with Shafiq, Younis and Misbah in the middle-order which was exposed in Mohali.

As for the bolded - surely the converse is true. Chief Selector can name whoever he wants, but the captain decides on the final XI. I still cannot understand the justification for playing Khurram Manzoor in T20s despite a SR around 110, playing Anwar Ali ahead of Aamer Yamin, or debuting 39 year old Rifatullah Mohmand. That guy's reflexes were so slow I thought my stream was buffering :))

Ajmal only played 3 games, Hafeez took 8 wickets. Afridi was the leader of the attack and the leader of the team.

Timid and defensive yet he managed to take us to 2 consecutive SF’s in major tournaments.

Shafiq, Younis and Misbah weren’t picked by Afridi, if they were then they wouldn’t have played in the 2015 WC, Shafiq even managed to get into CT13 Squad over Afridi.

Who was Khurram Manzoor stopping from coming into the team.
 
An intriguing choice as chief selector for sure.

Afridi had a lot of ups and downs in his career, but one thing that sticks in my head is when he retired from Test cricket in the middle of the series against Australia. (after being named captain.)

He should have seen out that series for me.

As much as we should criticise a lot of what he has done in his career, I think given what happened after that series, you can understand why he made that decision.
 
Afridi was the captain during the disasterous 2016 Asia Cup and 2016 T20 World Cup where we exited from group stages. He and Waqar played four seamers on a raging turner in Kolkata vs India.

He also persisted with tuktuks like Ahmed Shehzad, Khurram Manzoor, and gave 39 year old Rifatullah Mohmand a debut. He left the T20 side ranked 7th.

Now he, and his fellow culprit Haroon Rashid (the Chief Selector at the time and possibly our worst ever) are back on the selection panel ! What a country this is where failure is not only accepted but rewarded.

One step forward and 30 steps back! you got to love pakistan cricket
 
As much as we should criticise a lot of what he has done in his career, I think given what happened after that series, you can understand why he made that decision.

Very good point, I guess one way of looking at this one differently from my perspective is that being elevated to a leadership position gave Afridi new eyes on some of the things which were occurring off the field at that time, and he decided that he wanted no part of such a setup.
 
As much as we should criticise a lot of what he has done in his career, I think given what happened after that series, you can understand why he made that decision.

That means it was right under his knowledge that something wrong is being planned and still he kept mum and waited for disaster despite being a senior most member of the side. An international cricket team is an ambassador of the nation and the captain being a leader has more responsibility to maintain the dignity of the nation. The incident happened in 3rd test against Eng and Afridi ran away from captaincy after first test against Aus. If he had even iota of information he should have informed PCB / ICC
 
Reaching SFs in 2011 in Asian conditions was par given our spin attack of Ajmal, Hafeez and Afridi himself.

Afridi may have reputation for being an "aggressive beast" but was timid and defensive as skipper. The batting combination was virtually identical to our Test XI with Shafiq, Younis and Misbah in the middle-order which was exposed in Mohali.

As for the bolded - surely the converse is true. Chief Selector can name whoever he wants, but the captain decides on the final XI. I still cannot understand the justification for playing Khurram Manzoor in T20s despite a SR around 110, playing Anwar Ali ahead of Aamer Yamin, or debuting 39 year old Rifatullah Mohmand. That guy's reflexes were so slow I thought my stream was buffering :))

Exactly. Reaching Semi Final of 2011 WC was an average accomplishment. Pak defeated only 2 major teams Aus & Sri Lanka in that WC and heavily lost to NZ. All other matches were cakewalk for Pakistan in Asian conditions. The first major challenge was against India in Semi Final which was lost.

Persistence with players like Shahid Afridi, Younis Khan, Shoaib Malik & Hafeez was one of the major reason for Pakistan's downfall in ODI cricket. Misbah was also an average ODI cricketer but he didn't played as many matches as these guys played
 
Ajmal only played 3 games, Hafeez took 8 wickets. Afridi was the leader of the attack and the leader of the team.

Timid and defensive yet he managed to take us to 2 consecutive SF’s in major tournaments.

Shafiq, Younis and Misbah weren’t picked by Afridi, if they were then they wouldn’t have played in the 2015 WC, Shafiq even managed to get into CT13 Squad over Afridi.

Who was Khurram Manzoor stopping from coming into the team.

Funny how you are counting making SF as an achievement here while mocking the current team after they played 3 finals within a year.
 
That means it was right under his knowledge that something wrong is being planned and still he kept mum and waited for disaster despite being a senior most member of the side. An international cricket team is an ambassador of the nation and the captain being a leader has more responsibility to maintain the dignity of the nation. The incident happened in 3rd test against Eng and Afridi ran away from captaincy after first test against Aus. If he had even iota of information he should have informed PCB / ICC


This is old news…just a quick google search and you’ll find quotes of Afridi stating that he reported the agent to the coach and manager.



Funny how you are counting making SF as an achievement here while mocking the current team after they played 3 finals within a year.


Mocking a team that takes players like Shan Masood, over proper T20 openers like Sharjeel is justifiable.

Mocking a t20 team that plays 2 accumulators at the top is justifiable.

Stating Afridi did nothing in his career as a player and captain is factually incorrect, and that’s what I’ve shown here.
 
Back
Top