What's new

SL BP XI v Pakistanis | Tour Match | 20/3/2014 | Moratuwa

Status
Not open for further replies.
Since Umar's dismissal

22.4
Randiv to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
22.5
Randiv to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
22.6
Randiv to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 leg bye
End of over 23 (2 runs) Pakistanis 133/3 (193 runs required from 27 overs, RR: 5.78, RRR: 7.14)

Misbah-ul-Haq0 (3b)
Younis Khan24 (32b 1x4)
S Randiv5-0-19-2
NLTC Perera5-0-23-0
23.1
Perera to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
23.2
Perera to Younis Khan, 2 runs
23.3
Perera to Younis Khan, 1 run, OUT
Younis Khan run out 27 (34b 1x4 0x6) SR: 79.41
23.4
Perera to Fawad Alam, no run
23.5
Perera to Fawad Alam, 3 runs
23.6
Perera to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
End of over 24 (8 runs) Pakistanis 141/4 (185 runs required from 26 overs, RR: 5.87, RRR: 7.11)

Misbah-ul-Haq2 (5b)
Fawad Alam3 (2b)
NLTC Perera6-0-31-0
S Randiv5-0-19-2
24.1
Randiv to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
24.2
Randiv to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
24.3
Randiv to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
24.4
Randiv to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
24.5
Randiv to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
24.6
Randiv to Fawad Alam, no run
End of over 25 (1 run) Pakistanis 142/4 (184 runs required from 25 overs, RR: 5.68, RRR: 7.36)

Fawad Alam3 (3b)
Misbah-ul-Haq3 (10b)
S Randiv6-0-20-2
NLTC Perera6-0-31-0
25.1
Gamage to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
25.2
Gamage to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
25.3
Gamage to Fawad Alam, no run
25.4
Gamage to Fawad Alam, no run
25.5
Gamage to Fawad Alam, no run
25.6
Gamage to Fawad Alam, no run
End of over 26 (1 run) Pakistanis 143/4 (183 runs required from 24 overs, RR: 5.50, RRR: 7.62)

Fawad Alam3 (7b)
Misbah-ul-Haq4 (12b)
PLS Gamage5-0-38-0
S Randiv6-0-20-2
26.1
Dilshan to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
26.2
Dilshan to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
26.3
Dilshan to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
26.4
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, 1 run
26.5
Dilshan to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
26.6
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, 1 run
End of over 27 (4 runs) Pakistanis 147/4 (179 runs required from 23 overs, RR: 5.44, RRR: 7.78)

Fawad Alam5 (9b)
Misbah-ul-Haq6 (16b)
TM Dilshan1-0-4-0
PLS Gamage5-0-38-0
27.1
Gamage to Fawad Alam, 1 run
27.2
Gamage to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
27.3
Gamage to Fawad Alam, 1 run
27.4
Gamage to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
27.5
Gamage to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
27.6
Gamage to Fawad Alam, 1 run
End of over 28 (5 runs) Pakistanis 152/4 (174 runs required from 22 overs, RR: 5.42, RRR: 7.90)

Fawad Alam8 (12b)
Misbah-ul-Haq8 (19b)
PLS Gamage6-0-43-0
TM Dilshan1-0-4-0
28.1
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, 1 run
28.2
Dilshan to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
28.3
Dilshan to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
28.4
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, no run
28.5
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, 1 run
28.6
Dilshan to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
End of over 29 (4 runs) Pakistanis 156/4 (170 runs required from 21 overs, RR: 5.37, RRR: 8.09)

Misbah-ul-Haq10 (22b)
Fawad Alam10 (15b)
TM Dilshan2-0-8-0
PLS Gamage6-0-43-0
29.1
de Silva to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
29.2
de Silva to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
29.3
de Silva to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
29.4
de Silva to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
29.5
de Silva to Fawad Alam, no run
29.6
de Silva to Fawad Alam, no run
End of over 30 (1 run) Pakistanis 157/4 (169 runs required from 20 overs, RR: 5.23, RRR: 8.45)

Fawad Alam10 (17b)
Misbah-ul-Haq11 (26b)
PC de Silva5-0-21-0
TM Dilshan2-0-8-0
30.1
Dilshan to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
30.2
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, no run
30.3
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, no run
30.4
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, no run
30.5
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, no run
30.6
Dilshan to Fawad Alam, 1 run
End of over 31 (2 runs) Pakistanis 159/4 (167 runs required from 19 overs, RR: 5.12, RRR: 8.78)

Fawad Alam11 (22b)
Misbah-ul-Haq12 (27b)
TM Dilshan3-0-10-0
PC de Silva5-0-21-0
31.1
de Silva to Fawad Alam, 1 run
31.2
de Silva to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
31.3
de Silva to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
31.4
de Silva to Misbah-ul-Haq, 1 run
31.5
de Silva to Fawad Alam, no run
31.6
de Silva to Fawad Alam, 1 run
Match State: Drinks

RR gone done by 1 and RRR gone up by 1 :))

Misbah or Fawad. You cant pick both. Whichever one is picked has to bat at 1-3, otherwise they just kill the momentum
 
They've done fine actually. Need to launch the attack now though. Otherwise this game is lost. 9 RPO in 18 overs isn't so hard in this age of T20. We've got Misbah, Fawad, Maqsood, Afridi, Wahab and Anwar who can bat.
 
It will be a shame for us if we lose this warm up. Dont they see and use their mind that the run rate is creeping up :/
 
Ideally Misbah should retire from all forms of international cricket immediately.
 
Improvement.

Misbah now striking at a jaw dropping SR of 43.Looking to up the RR here.
 
They've done fine actually. Need to launch the attack now though. Otherwise this game is lost. 9 RPO in 18 overs isn't so hard in this age of T20. We've got Misbah, Fawad, Maqsood, Afridi, Wahab and Anwar who can bat.

This is exactly what is wrong with Pak cricket.There is only one recognized bat after these two and thats Maqsood.

The others are all tailenders.Do you expect them to go at 9 per over??
 
How is batting at the SR of 48 and 53 respectively against a club level attack on a flat deck chasing 326, "fine"?
 
Misbah missing out on two free hits??

32.5 Chameera to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run
32.5 Chameera to Misbah-ul-Haq, (no ball) 2 runs
32.5 Chameera to Fawad Alam, (no ball) 1 run
 
Man they are killing Maqsood's career.

Such a fine bat and going down the drain.
 
And then they said . . . . . Fawad is the master of strike rotation.
 
Misbah-ul-Haq* not out 25 41 1 0 60.97
Fawad Alam not out 19 34 0 0 55.88

Outstanding Misbah
 
Hahahaha

They're doing it just to annoy Savak I reckon.

In all seriousness this is a practice game but those SR's are inexcusable

Exactly.

A practice game doesn't mean you go ahead and lose it. :facepalm:

I need to change my username. :/
 
If Fawad had come at #4 instead of Umar Akmal, Pakistan would have lost 1 less wicket now and in a lot better condition to win this match knowing both Umar Akmal and Afridi will be coming next. Now the whole pressure is on Afridi.
 
Last edited:
Partnership at run rate of 4.8 lasting 14 overs while chasing 326 against such a mediocre bowling unit. :14:
 
Phew, Misbah and Misbah lite gone. Hopefully Maqsood and Afridi will restore order.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top