South Africa v England | CT 2009 | Centurion | 27/9/2009

Status
Not open for further replies.
45.5
Anderson to Parnell, no run, slower bouncer from Anderson, Parnell was through with his **** before the ball arrived, attempts a second shot at it, the ball sails over middle stump
 
A brave brave captains innings from Grame Smith, well done sir...brilliantly played...

Ive lost a huge amount of respect for Strauss
 
checkers.llvllaster said:
They better have calculated how much they need to get to surpass SL or they won't even have a minute chance. After this game, either SL or SA are definitely out of the tournament I think...

They need 315 (give or take)

They're out
 
Broad to Smith, OUT, this could be the end for South Africa, Smith's heroic innings comes to an end, Smith backed away and looked to smash that to midwicket, top edges it to mid-on, the crowd gives Smith a standing ovation
 
So SAF are out for sure?

But I do have to take a moment out to congratulate Smith. Valiant knock that.
 
South Africa require another 50 runs with 1 wicket and 18 balls remaining
 
'South African bowlers have let them down in this tournament" Bob Willis
 
Mohsin said:
They need 315 (give or take)

They're out

Then I'm surprised by the rash approach they took. They should have worked singles and an odd boundary to get to that score even if they couldn't achieve 324...
 
Willis has a point, this South African bowling unit conceeded 300 plus runs in two games out of three.
 
Wait a second:

RSA lose this. They have 1 win from three. So do Sri Lanka.

If england beat new zealand aswell then they have 1 win. Then it goes to net RR right?
 
South Africa require another 41 runs with 1 wicket and 12 balls remaining Required RR 20.50
 
Juggernaut said:
Wait a second:

RSA lose this. They have 1 win from three. So do Sri Lanka.

If england beat new zealand aswell then they have 1 win. Then it goes to net RR right?

If New Zealand beat Eng they will have two wins too.

Yes, then it goes to net run rate.
 
Juggernaut said:
Wait a second:

RSA lose this. They have 1 win from three. So do Sri Lanka.

If england beat new zealand aswell then they have 1 win. Then it goes to net RR right?

But you see SL alread have their RR and if SA don't get to 313 or 314 or whatever it is , their RR is going to be lower then SL, so that means they will be out...
 
Last edited:
Juggernaut said:
Wait a second:

RSA lose this. They have 1 win from three. So do Sri Lanka.

If england beat new zealand aswell then they have 1 win. Then it goes to net RR right?

Sri Lanka have better net run rate until SA score 313, which probably won't happen

SA are out

(hahaha)
 
Juggernaut said:
Wait a second:

RSA lose this. They have 1 win from three. So do Sri Lanka.

If england beat new zealand aswell then they have 1 win. Then it goes to net RR right?
YES bit SAF loses by more then 9 runs then they are out period
 
Juggernaut said:
Wait a second:

RSA lose this. They have 1 win from three. So do Sri Lanka.

If england beat new zealand aswell then they have 1 win. Then it goes to net RR right?
they need to score 314 runs to go above srilanka
 
Who said Parnel is a good batter, he sucks with the bat.
 
Dale Steyn:

''If the team play to their potential, and this might sound cocky, I really believe no side can match us at the Champions Trophy."

Looks like thats gonna come back to bite him in the backside.
 
i think at this point most people would probably put their money on pakistan or australia to win this tournament
 
Wow what an effort from Eng team.

Totally unexpected.
 
South Africa require another 37 runs with 1 wicket and 7 balls remaining
 
These two can only take the score probally around 290ish so that means South Africa are offically out.
 
As usual the South Africans bigging themselves before a major tournament especially in their home conditions and falling flat on their faces.
 
broad is today expensive for england.... 9.6 0 67 3 6.70 31 10 1
 
coy0607 said:
i think at this point most people would probably put their money on pakistan or australia to win this tournament

Aussies are one game from going out and not entirely convincing. Whoever scrapes through out of them and India, probably not going to be their tournament.

NZ are boring

SL are out of form

Pakistan or England to win
 
steyn told his team management why they send him up the order. i have the germs of batsman :))
 
won by 22 runs, through to the semis. woooo

pretty comfortable win in the end really
 
Mohsin said:
Styen's highest score has a;ready got me the points! :p

where are you on the points table ?

lol parnell gets a over throw , thats 2 points ..what a champ :)))
 
England are through.

South Africa out.

New Zealand beat England and their through.

Who would have thunk it!
 
Juggernaut said:
England are through.

South Africa out.

New Zealand beat England and their through.

Who would have thunk it!

New Zealand loses then either Sri lanka or New Zealand through.
 
South Africa are knocked out of yet another tournament that they entered as favourites, driven off the front foot to covers for a single, there are four inconsequential overthrows as well
 
Congrats to the poms, they were better on the day. BTW SA didn't choke, England won it. To say that SA choked implies that England didn't win it on their own, which they did.
 
south africa again proves that they are ,,,,...,,,,/.chokers./,,,..,,,,
 
jusarrived said:
is SA the Dinarra safina of cricket ? :D

She aint that good.

Graeme Smith plays a knock and a half.

Captains knock. Shame their was no support.
 
Juggernaut said:
She aint that good.

Graeme Smith plays a knock and a half.

Captains knock. Shame their was no support.


but still the no1 , who cant win big tournaments ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top