What's new

Test Cricket Zindabad!

The cricket is seperate.

The branding and marketing is wjat i am talking about. IPL has become a brand and that brand itself is what makes ipl a cash cow, not the cricket.

Ashes is good test cricket but not a brand.

The level of marketing for both differs

You don't need marketing for Ashes. It has already become a brand for aussies and england fans. Neutrals like you and me also tune into watch ashes cricket where as nobody cares about IPL outside India. :inti
 
The occasion, the pressure, the history, the level of cricket. What we witnessed today was superior in every way to any IPL match ever.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">No doubt one of the greatest Test matches you will ever see. Test cricket is very much alive and kicking <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Ashes2019?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Ashes2019</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1165646787258060800?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Give me a day of Test Cricket like Today (Eng vs Saf) over any T20 Circus show!

Maybe it just shows my age. But Id rather watch one day like today than 10 t20 matches!!
 
Yep same here, watching England test matches is always edge of the seat stuff, no wonder they get exceptional following
 
Surely the prolonged display of pure skills and excitement on a good last day of test match provides is something which is rarely matched even by ODIs.

This is one of the reasons that one remembers quite a lot of the classic tests ending on day 5 years after which is much more in terms of number of ODIs or T20s one remembers. I remember quite a few classic tests from the last decade which I have watched but cant say the same for ODIs or T20s and it would most likely the case with most fans as well.

Good test matches create long term memories which is a rare occurrence in LOIs barring ICC tournaments and few exceptions. Though I do enjoy ODIs and T20s as well but most of those dont form much long term memories as I said.
 
Stokes bowling superb spell with express pace that too after bowling 20 odd over .This guy is supremely fit and legend in making
 
Give me one such day of test cricket over a whole year of limited overs cricket.

To think some imbeciles at the ECB and CA want to do away with the fifth day and deprive us of such an absorbing culmination to a hard fought match.
 
As a title-winning coach with Adelaide Strikers in the KFC Big Bash League and with Yorkshire in England's county championship, Jason Gillespie has witnessed cricket's contemporary evolution from a vantage point few can match.

And the former Australia fast bowler has noted a distinct shift in players' aspirations and expectations over recent years that are subtly shifting the game's demographics, and might potentially bring profound change to the Test format.

With the Strikers finishing third in the BBL|09 regular season, and eyeing his third season in charge of Sussex in the UK after five years at the helm of Yorkshire, Gillespie can claim a rare breadth and depth of coaching experiences.

During that time, he has witnessed a growing number of senior cricketers keen to walk away from the first-class game upon passing age 30 with the aim of ending their careers in the shorter formats, a fact borne out even today by the news that New Zealand leg-spinner Todd Astle – a member of the Black Caps XI for the final Test of their recent Domain Series in Australia – was turning his back on red-ball cricket to concentrate on the shorter formats.

"As I've got to the back end of my career I've found it harder to maintain the level of commitment required to be fully invested in this (long-form) version of the game," 33-year-old Astle said in announcing his decision.

But while Gillespie expects that trend to continue growing among players of Astle's seniority, he also expects that ever more players will make choices much earlier in their careers to specialise in one-day (50-over) cricket and – potentially in even greater numbers – the 20-over format.

"I'm seeing players, and hearing of players, from all age groups who want to have conversations about the prospect of focusing on the shorter forms of the game," Gillespie told cricket.com.au recently.

"It's happening everywhere.

"Certainly, every county in England has at least one player who is having a conversation about potentially wanting to specialise in the shorter forms of the game."

For many ageing stars the likes of South Africa duo AB de Villiers and Dale Steyn, who signed with the KFC Big Bash this season having called time on their international commitments, the appeal of short-format competition is often the smaller window it occupies in the annual playing schedule.

However, Gillespie believes that the ongoing growth of T20 franchise competitions around the globe means young players who doubt they will earn international playing honours also see those tournaments as a genuine opportunity to experience life as an international cricketer.

In addition to established series such as BBL, the Indian Premier League and T20 tournaments in Pakistan and the Caribbean, South Africa launched their domestic T20 event last year and England's franchise-based The Hundred – a new twist on the 20-over format – begins in mid-2020.

As a result, players who might have otherwise foreseen their futures confined to state or county teams now believe honing their short-form skills might offer a more realistic chance to strut their stuff on the world stage as professional cricketers.

"If you've never played international cricket, it's the next best thing," Gillespie said of the lure that T20 competitions now provide.

"To play in different countries, be exposed to different cultures, different team environments, with different teammates and coaches.

"While there's certainly a financial carrot being dangled to become a franchise T20 player, there's also the opportunity to learn and improve and develop your game in a different environment, with different coaches who have different ideas on the game.

"It's exciting, and I think a lot of players are seeing that as a career path, especially if they don't see a future representing their own country.

"So I think we'll see more and more players making that that choice."

Gillespie also challenges perceptions that 20-over cricket holds appeal for players entering their twilight on-field years because it takes a lesser toll on their bodies.

The former quick, who played 71 Tests and 97 one-day internationals for Australia as well as a stint in the ill-fated Indian Cricket League T20 competition, echoed the thoughts of fellow fast bowler Mitchell Johnson that 20-over cricket can be the most physically demanding.

He claimed that was certainly the case for fast bowlers, who often take longer to recover from four overs at the crease and 16 overs in the field than they do to bounce back from a full ODI or four consecutive days of first-class cricket.

"It's because you're just not getting the volume and you're bowling in a high-intensity game," Gillespie said.

"So don't assume that T20 – because it's less overs – puts less stress on the body.

"I know players who pull up less sore from a 50-over game and from a day of (English county) Championship cricket than from a 20-over game."

Gillespie believes there will always be a strong core of players, particularly in Australia and the UK, who prioritise Test cricket over the shorter formats.

But as he's seen across almost a decade, since taking over as Yorkshire coach in late-2011, a Test cap is no longer the single, unifying ambition of a cricketer progressing through pathway programs into senior competitions.

"Ten years ago, that (Test ambition) was pretty exclusive, or it was very rare for someone to say, 'I prefer to play the shortest form of the game'," he said.

"But now, the players are increasingly looking at one-day and T20 as a genuine career option and foregoing the long form of the game."

Consequently, Gillespie admits to holding fears for the primacy of cricket's elite form among some of the 12 current Test-playing nations.

Test cricket will long remain a cornerstone in Australia and the UK, and over the immediate-term in India where – despite the upsurge in support for the IPL – the patronage of current men's captain Virat Kohli (an avowed advocate for Tests) will ensure the longest format remains strong.

Global administrators also see Pakistan (where Test cricket has recently returned after a prolonged hiatus due to security concerns) and Bangladesh as future standard-bearers for the Test game on the back of their vast populations and resultant pools of player talent.

However, on their most recent Test visit to Australia last November, Pakistan fielded a fast-bowling attack featuring teenagers Shaheen Shah Afridi (19), Muhammad Musa Khan (19) and Naseem Shah (16) after left-arm strike bowler Mohammad Amir (27) quit Test cricket to pursue short-form opportunities.

It's a similar situation to which the West Indies Test outfit has found itself in recent years, and other small nations (such as Sri Lanka) plus those not blessed with hefty coffers (South Africa and New Zealand) have faced questions about the viability of Test cricket in their respective domains.

Gillespie, who began his coaching journey in Zimbabwe's domestic franchise competition in 2010 and has also served as head coach for Papua New Guinea's national men's team, acknowledges the gathering appeal and drawing power of T20 competitions presents challenges for the Test game.

"I've got concerns for Test cricket outside of Australia and England," he said.

"India, I think there is still the appetite for the game because Indians just love cricket even though 50-over and T20 still rule there, and it's encouraging to see that New Zealand still rate it.

"But I fear for Test cricket in places like the West Indies and Sri Lanka and South Africa.

"It will always have a place here and in England, but the rest of the world I'm not so sure about.

"I guess we just have to wait and see."

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/jas...eers-older-players-countries-fears/2020-01-28
 
Former Sri Lanka captain Kumar Sangakkara feels Test cricket shouldn’t be treated like a cash cow and money should be put in the format regardless of financial returns.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) came up with World Test Championship to reinvigorate the format in the white-ball era but Sangakkara feels sustaining such tournaments will be difficult but something which has to be done to keep the format alive and kicking.

“If you are going to treat Test cricket as a cash cow I don’t think it is ever going to work. It”s not going to make financial sense,” Sangakkara told former England captain Michael Atherton in a video uploaded on Sky Sports Cricket YouTube channel.

“Sometimes Test cricket isn’t going to make sporting sense if you are going to market it to an American or someone who has not been involved in the game. Rather than trying to change their sense of Test cricket maybe we need to change how we look at Test cricket. Not everyone is going to have an iconic series like the Ashes with full crowd.

“Talk about how to build up the rivalries. Then what about Afghanistan and Zimbabwe and Ireland now… and Bangladesh who are the team on the rise but in the shorter formats.

“So what are we going to do about that? Are we going to forget about that? Two-tier Test cricket… Test Championships… just do whatever it takes but it that doesn”t work, sustain it. Put in the money.”

The World Test Championship, which began in 2019 and ends with a final at Lord’s in 2021 as per initial schedule, has been going on for a while now with India leading the way with 360 points. Australia remain second with 296 points while New Zealand complete the top-three with 180 points. But the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the game might see a rework on the calendar.

https://www.cricketcountry.com/news...et-as-a-cash-cow-says-kumar-sangakkara-933623
 
Can’t bloody wait for the Pak vs Eng Test series to start. Test cricket Zindabad!
 
Test is always fun to watch!

However, I can see it being 4-day long at some point. Not that I want it but it may happen.
 
Cricket's most attractive format of the game - proved itself once again.
 
So people enjoying Test cricket so far? tense battle between bat and ball
 
Immensely satisfying to see a Sherdil approach to the game by Pakistani Janbaaz openers..
 
Tommarow we might win it or we might lose it.

But i am too excited. It sucks that play had to end on day 3. Im super excited about what could happen.

If we could cross and make it till 270. Or even if we bowl with 250 wil we be taking wickets early on.

The curioisty and suspense wont let me sleep tonight, but really excited for tomr
 
What are the TV ratings like? Are a lot of people tuning in? I am sure Sky is happy. With some what of a captive audience, they get to cash in. But they need eyeballs in front of TV's. Is that happening?
 
Real Cricket at its best. Some people will argue that market forces, demand, supply blah blah cr@p but you can never replace this cricket with that tamasha. :inti
 
i dont want this match to be a nail biting finish.

cant take it
 
The beauty of Test cricket is that is gives opportunities to all 22 players to show their skills at some point of the game means the better of the two sides can make a comeback - something highly correlated to the duration of the game. The shorter the game, skill gap between the two sides reduces means upsets are more frequent.

England did pull an amazing win here - on that track conceding a lead of 100+ was like match losing effort after first innings, but they did manage to turn it over.

It’s possible only in Test cricket.
 
The beauty of Test cricket is that is gives opportunities to all 22 players to show their skills at some point of the game means the better of the two sides can make a comeback - something highly correlated to the duration of the game. The shorter the game, skill gap between the two sides reduces means upsets are more frequent.

England did pull an amazing win here - on that track conceding a lead of 100+ was like match losing effort after first innings, but they did manage to turn it over.

It’s possible only in Test cricket.

Sigh. I feel really depressed reading this... time to stop thinking about this game. Gotta binge on video games for the next few days to get this out of my system. Damn, I'm still hurting - don't know how we allowed such a come back.
 
Sigh. I feel really depressed reading this... time to stop thinking about this game. Gotta binge on video games for the next few days to get this out of my system. Damn, I'm still hurting - don't know how we allowed such a come back.

PAK lost this game for lack of self belief which was evident in Babar’s second time batting - he has playing like a scared boy when his team was like 150/2 in a spinners track and crumbling. Then, 277 still was a daunting task, yet Azhar spread his fielders out before lunch when still ~250 was required.

I’ll have to blame Misbah & Waquar for this ultra safety first attitude, which is very uncharacteristic of PAK cricket. Both were ultra defensive as captain and PAK’s approach to the game reflects that. Just for few overs a counter attacking Yasir actually showed what you can do with positive approach.
 
What are the TV ratings like? Are a lot of people tuning in? I am sure Sky is happy. With some what of a captive audience, they get to cash in. But they need eyeballs in front of TV's. Is that happening?

Test cricket viewing figures on the up

Those who fear for the future of Test cricket may be encouraged by Sky's viewing figures.

The recent visit of the West Indies was the highest-rated series of all time on Sky Sports in terms of average viewing while Saturday's thrilling conclusion of England v Pakistan saw a peak of more than 1.7million across the main event and cricket channels.

That is a record non-Ashes peak and the second-highest for Tests on Sky.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/o...ENDA-Tim-Henman-family-play-centre-court.html
 
Test cricket viewing figures on the up

Those who fear for the future of Test cricket may be encouraged by Sky's viewing figures.

The recent visit of the West Indies was the highest-rated series of all time on Sky Sports in terms of average viewing while Saturday's thrilling conclusion of England v Pakistan saw a peak of more than 1.7million across the main event and cricket channels.

That is a record non-Ashes peak and the second-highest for Tests on Sky.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/o...ENDA-Tim-Henman-family-play-centre-court.html

So people are interested in cricket in the UK. The popular belief seems to be that cricket is a dying sport in the UK.

Obviously these numbers will make Sky and ECB happy. The question now is, how to retain this viewership? Are these numbers Covid related? Would people have tuned in at this rate if things were normal?
 
Day 4 was really enjoyable. Test cricket is the premier format for a reason!

I am not so sure if the majority of fans agree. Outside of two countries, I do not see much demand for tests. In fact almost all series outside Big3 draw small to none in terms of crowds in stadium or eyeballs in TV.

Currently there are only two, yes just two series that are 5 tests and a solitary series that is 4 tests (maybe there is one more I am missing). All the rest are limited to 3, 2 and even 1 test. This does look like a thriving format. One can hope that the WTC has gotten rid of the 2 and 1 test "series".

On the other side of the coin, I see all these T20 leagues that are robust and thriving and boards are scrambling to start their own. These leagues seem to have fans, sponsors and players gravitating towards them.

Now, how do boards outside of ECB and CA replicate the T20 league following (in the ground and on TV) for their tests?
 
Another tense battle in progress but the timings etc need sorting.
 
The bad light rules need to be revisited if the game is to progress.
 
Jaipur: Former England captain David Gower believes that current India skipper Virat Kohli's love for the Test format is great advertisement for the longest format of the gentleman's game.

In a conversation on SportsTiger's show 'Off-the-Field' Gower discussed his illustrious cricketing career, Test cricket, the Ashes, IPL's impact, Kohli and how the game has changed over the years.

Gower, who featured for the three-lions in 117 Test matches and 114 One Day Internationals (ODI) scoring 8,231 and 3170 runs respectively, seemed mighty impressed by the Indian captain's love for Test cricket.

"Virat Kohli as the leading player of the world calling Test cricket as the toughest and most important form is great PR for the format," he said.

Gower also picked his best Test XI from the current players and said Ben Stokes and Virat Kohli will be the instant picks for him and there are no two ways about it. He also picked Joe Root, Kane Williamson and Steve Smith as a part of the team. He also said if a current-day spinner is to be chosen it would be between Ravichandran Ashwin and Nathan Lyon.

He also said, "If I have to pick a captain for the team it will surely be Virat. What I like about Virat apart from his talent is his passion and absolute drive. Cricket is still a game where you can be a brilliant individual within the team but too much of individuality can also be harmful but Virat is an extraordinary individual contributing to the team."

Speaking about the IPL, Gower went on to say, "I think overall the IPL has been very good for cricketers, both for the homegrown and the international players. Ever since the games have got shorter from the time of the invention of ODI, fielding has become incredible. I think T20 has changed a lot since the first days of IPL when IPL was taking some of the great players from around the world at the end of their career. But now, one wants the young players. I feel it is a very good training ground for players."

Gower who has captained England in the Ashes and has featured in eight Ashes series commented on the legacy of the clash and said, "It is one of the series which has an illustrious history. For an English or Australian cricketer, it means the history of Don Bradman, Keith Miller, Len Hutton, Wally Hammond and WG Grace. The first time I was in the dressing room at the Sydney Cricket Ground, I looked around thinking that there have been some great players who have been in these exact same rooms. The Ashes has that absolute history about it."

https://gulfnews.com/sport/cricket/...ew-star-emerges-in-haider-ali-1.1599006388993
 
As good as it gets!

Pakistani fans may be distraught but the NZ v Pak Test has once again rekindled love for Tests!

6093d45e-ee6f-4f11-a835-e9e020e37aef.jpg
 
The title should be "5 day Test Zindabad". I want to burry that idea of 4 Day Test.................
 
What about the other two matches which finished in 4 days?

A Test can end in 3 days, I don't mind but it has to be scheduled for 5 days. Psychology in Test cricket works opposite - the longer the duration, the game will be faster because you can't bail out a draw through back door. PAK batted at this pace in this Test because they knew they can't win this Test after Kiwis posted 431 in 11 hours - so better try to avoid defeat. In 4 day Tests, every team will do that after second session, if the batting side is at 201/2 on 1st Tea.....
 
How about "3 years long tournament is zindabad"?

WTC is a rubbish idea not because of Test cricket or two years, rather these selective opponents and jokes of two Test series .... ideally, it should be for 4 years cycle with the final between T20 & ODI WCs (years) and each team playing each other home & away minimum 3 Tests Series - they can make it two divisions for that with one pro and one demo, while allowing cross division series out side Championships.
 
A Test can end in 3 days, I don't mind but it has to be scheduled for 5 days. Psychology in Test cricket works opposite - the longer the duration, the game will be faster because you can't bail out a draw through back door. PAK batted at this pace in this Test because they knew they can't win this Test after Kiwis posted 431 in 11 hours - so better try to avoid defeat. In 4 day Tests, every team will do that after second session, if the batting side is at 201/2 on 1st Tea.....

It might be a good idea for you but a lot of people get bored by the first four days of Test cricket in such matches and you can not blame them. At least in the 4-day match, teams would be forced to play a bit more penetrating cricket unlike what we saw in this match where NZ bored us for first two days.
 
It might be a good idea for you but a lot of people get bored by the first four days of Test cricket in such matches and you can not blame them. At least in the 4-day match, teams would be forced to play a bit more penetrating cricket unlike what we saw in this match where NZ bored us for first two days.

It won't happen - Test cricket is not County games where you get extra 16 (?) points for a win, so lots of funny staff happens there - teams declares/forfeits innings and then lose the game or teams bowl lollypops to induce a target. Steve Ossagnessy once hit a 23 ball hundred when lobs were bowled by part-timers and fielders kicked the ball to boundary. Test cricket is tough - no one plays to lose here and won't give a single inch if there is not a decent chance of win.

It's statistically proven, you can check - from time less Tests, cricket moved to fixed day (4/5/6) Tests after WW2 - the scoring rate was historically slowest in 1950s & 60s. Make 4 day Test, half of it will be wasted for gamesmanship. Ideally, Test match should be 6 day long with the 4th being rest day - if there is any significant over loss in first 3 days, rest day will be played out - it'll make the game faster.

A t20 game takes about 4 hours, that still more than a hour than an NFL game or an NBA game; therefore reducing a day won't make much difference, but it'll kill whatever left in the game. And for Asian teams, it's utmost important that Test cricket is played for 5 days so that spin play (both with bat & ball) remains a vital part of the game.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Test Cricket romance! A result in the dying stages of day 5. ❤️</p>— Brendon McCullum (@Bazmccullum) <a href="https://twitter.com/Bazmccullum/status/1344194008814211072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
WTC is a rubbish idea not because of Test cricket or two years, rather these selective opponents and jokes of two Test series .... ideally, it should be for 4 years cycle with the final between T20 & ODI WCs (years) and each team playing each other home & away minimum 3 Tests Series - they can make it two divisions for that with one pro and one demo, while allowing cross division series out side Championships.

WTC left a lot to be desired when you have selective opposition and also having a series with 2 tests. Due to these shortcomings, it's not going to produce the best two sides many times.

Right now, India playing WI for 2 tests at home will gather more points than India drawing 2-2 in Aus despite later being ridiculously harder. If you can play all teams then it will even out and with at least 3 tests, you don't miss out due to rain, etc too much.
 
Brother [MENTION=93712]MenInG[/MENTION] sure as hell enjoyed this draw :yk
 
On topic, test cricket is like :heart:

Hard fought test matches like these are ishq.

5 days cricket forever
 
Whatever is the result of this test match, lets stand and applause this series #AusVsInd

I have seen many test matches & series but for various reasons i think this is one of the best ever Test match series i have watched. It is down the wire and still we are not able to get the winner. Both Australia & India deserve the credit for keeping Test cricket interesting.
 
Fantastic series. #AusVsInd

Has been competitive since 2001.
 
You won't see this level of happiness and enthusiasm in fans and players after winning an IPL season. Test cricket at its best. :inti
 
Winning & losing is a part of game in Test cricket, but this series has so many ups and downs that even BSE (Bombay Stock Exchange) doesn't have. Everyday was a great day for test cricket.
 
Test Cricket is test of Grit, Resilience, Longevity, Defensive Offence and Calculated Risks.

I dont give a damn if India Loses a Bilateral T20 or a ODI series against any opposition.

This ranks very high. Test Cricket Zindabad.

As for 4 day tests, Test Cricket should never be tweaked, Longest form of cricket is Heritage.
 
Last edited:
A hard earned 5th day victory or draw is worth infinitely more than myriad T20/ ODI wins. This series showed us the value of a test cricket - well done to both teams. Hope Pak & other teams invest in the Test cricket format too, which frankly they havent in the last 5 years.
 
That late burst from Yasir after a day of SA grinding into a better and better position after being so behind.

What a brilliant see-saw game. Nothing quite like Test cricket
 
I have been saying since ages that the ICC needs to introduce a rule where every Test playing nation should play a minimum of 10 Test matches every year.
 
I have been saying since ages that the ICC needs to introduce a rule where every Test playing nation should play a minimum of 10 Test matches every year.

How are smaller boards financially going to sustain it?
Just recently BD cancel their home test series against NZ as it cost them a lot more. Smaller boards are always going to struggle hosting test matches, specially against lower ranked teams. I’m enjoying test matches these days and I would like it to be preserved, but sometimes law of economics would take precedence if not found a solution.
 
How are smaller boards financially going to sustain it?
Just recently BD cancel their home test series against NZ as it cost them a lot more. Smaller boards are always going to struggle hosting test matches, specially against lower ranked teams. I’m enjoying test matches these days and I would like it to be preserved, but sometimes law of economics would take precedence if not found a solution.

BD canceled it not because of finance. They canceled it due to COVID-19.
 
BD canceled it not because of finance. They canceled it due to COVID-19.

If they wanted they could have hosted it now instead of LOIs against W Indies but chose not to. Let’s face it, BD will make much more money with LOIs than test match. There is a reason why BD have always hosted 2-test match series even against top nations.
 
If they wanted they could have hosted it now instead of LOIs against W Indies but chose not to. Let’s face it, BD will make much more money with LOIs than test match. There is a reason why BD have always hosted 2-test match series even against top nations.

It is not that simple. Scheduling takes time.

NZ are now playing Australia. They just played West Indies and Pakistan. After Australia, Bangladesh are scheduled to be in NZ.

Also, Bangladesh now face West Indies in Test too. Not just LOI.

Regarding 2-match series, many teams do that.
 
Last edited:
It is not that simple. Scheduling takes time.

NZ are now playing Australia. They just played West Indies and Pakistan. After Australia, Bangladesh are scheduled to be in NZ.

Also, Bangladesh now face West Indies in Test too. Not just LOI.

Regarding 2-match series, many teams do that.

Finance is not a major problem for Bangladesh. They are more well off than some other mid-tier boards (SL, West Indies etc.).

You’re missing my point. I know BD have good revenue system in place but that revenue is generated mostly from LOIs( AD revenue is based on eye balls glued to tv) as most fans like us only casually follow test match. Lot of teams in last 10 years have downgraded their test series from 3 test matches to 2, in order to lower the hosting expenses. BCCI makes more revenue hosting one T20I than 5 day test match, I’m pretty sure that’s the case with lot of smaller boards including BD. We always blame cricket boards for not hosting more test matches but conveniently ignores the fact that we as a fans are equally blame for downfall of test matches.
 
You’re missing my point. I know BD have good revenue system in place but that revenue is generated mostly from LOIs( AD revenue is based on eye balls glued to tv) as most fans like us only casually follow test match. Lot of teams in last 10 years have downgraded their test series from 3 test matches to 2, in order to lower the hosting expenses. BCCI makes more revenue hosting one T20I than 5 day test match, I’m pretty sure that’s the case with lot of smaller boards including BD. We always blame cricket boards for not hosting more test matches but conveniently ignores the fact that we as a fans are equally blame for downfall of test matches.

True.

I personally love Test matches. I want to see more Tests involving all teams.
 
So awesome to see such high class players and compelling Test cricket back in Pakistan. Hopefully many more fantastic see-saw games to come. Test Cricket Zindabad!
 
That was an enjoyable match to watch. Yasir & Nauman put on a good show & the rest chipped in & bowled with discipline when needed. Contributions from top & lower order with the bat. Strong opposition. Pitch produced some good cricket. So good to have Tests in Pakistan again. Congratulations.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Love Test Cricket:<br><br>Mohammad Rizwan's excellent innings<br>South Africa's fightback<br>Rishabh Pant's brilliant batting<br>Dom Bess' bowling<br>Kyle Mayers amazing innings<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PAKvSA?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PAKvSA</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/INDvENG?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#INDvENG</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BANvWI?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BANvWI</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1358390745112195073?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 7, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Year is 2021, and we are only in month of February. We have already seen some exciting tests and brilliant performances by world's top cricketers in Cricket's best format :jimmy

Test cricket is stronger than ever. Test Cricket Zindabad.



If by some miracle Pakistan can play a test series against India, it would be epic for test cricket.
 
England v New Zealand.....

Busy killing off Test cricket.
 
No intent shown by England. 154 odd runs in 25 overs is quiet achievable with 9 wickets remaining. Kohli's India would have gone for the win. Eng is tuk tuking for a boring draw...phew.
 
There have been four problems:

1. England playing a weak team due to injury/rotation, while New Zealand are clearly treating it as a practice match for the WTC final

2. Sluggish pitch

3. Slow over-rate

4. Rain reducing the test to 4 days

All those factors have simultaneously combined to render this test very dull and devoid of intensity.
 
Lol no way were England going to chase that score. What's the point in trying when it wasn't possible? New Zealand would have done the same if they were batting. Nasser Hussain just trying to intentionally not side with the big 3 like always.
 
Back
Top