What's new

The battle of the keepers, Rishabh Pant versus Mohammad Rizwan

I think you need to maybe look up the word 'opinion' in the Webster's Dictionary or something. Because clearly you have no idea what it means. Instead of frothing at the mouth like you are learn to accept that not everyone is going to have the same opinion as you. Also learn to read because I have already made my point, which is that I think Rizwan is a better wicket-keeper batter than Pant.

Saying that Pant is the beneficiary of coming after 300/5 when in fact his entire career is embedded with and his reputation is forged on doing a demolition job *after* Indian top order has failed is NOT an opinion. It's the definition of misrepresenting facts. You will gain nothing from lashing out at me and digging a hole for yourself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rizwan
Pant is a massively overrated keeper and is nowhere close to the likes of gilchirst so comparing the 2 is laughable.

The likes of Butler and Quinton are leagues > him, Yes Pant has test exploits but honest to God he's just good.

However Pant vs Rizzu isn't a contest, Pant is easily superior to rizwan
Quinton and Buttler are nowhere near Pant in tests, in other formats both of them are way ahead
 
Well I do agree that DeKock and Buttler are in a different galaxy in limited overs.
No wasn't talking about that. Was referring to the allrounder claim, Gazza was referring to Rizwan as a very succeaful allrounder.

Basically our convo started about rizwan, and he used the allrounder nonsense and then the meaning of allrounder just became a troll fest.

Basically I don't agree with the notion of wicket keepers being allrounders, if they were allrounders they wouldn't be titled as wicket keeper batsmen. People like Glenn Maxwell, Shakib ul hasan, pandya etc are allrounders.
 
No wasn't talking about that. Was referring to the allrounder claim, Gazza was referring to Rizwan as a very succeaful allrounder.

Basically our convo started about rizwan, and he used the allrounder nonsense and then the meaning of allrounder just became a troll fest.

Basically I don't agree with the notion of wicket keepers being allrounders, if they were allrounders they wouldn't be titled as wicket keeper batsmen. People like Glenn Maxwell, Shakib ul hasan, pandya etc are allrounders.
@jeeteshssaxena as for Pant vs Quinton and Butler, Obviously Pant is far superior to those 2 in test? No one denies that. He's been gun for india in that format.
 
No wasn't talking about that. Was referring to the allrounder claim, Gazza was referring to Rizwan as a very succeaful allrounder.

Basically our convo started about rizwan, and he used the allrounder nonsense and then the meaning of allrounder just became a troll fest.

Basically I don't agree with the notion of wicket keepers being allrounders, if they were allrounders they wouldn't be titled as wicket keeper batsmen. People like Glenn Maxwell, Shakib ul hasan, pandya etc are allrounders.
Yeah, this Wicketkeeper being allrounder nonsense was started with Dhoni, dont agree with it at all.
 
Pant has actually more blazing knocks when team is in trouble than when team is sitting at 400/3.

5-98 Pant scored 146* in birmingham
5-121 Pant scored 114 in Oval
5-121 Pant scored 101 in Ahmedabad
4-58 Pant scored 100* in Cape town
4-94 Pant scored 90 plus in Mirpur
4-73 Pant scored 90 plus in Chennai
97 in Sydney and many kncoks actually came when India was in trouble.

Thanks for actually taking the trouble of listing out the scores.

That funny poster did his best to imply that Pant has the kind of record he does because of cashing in after the Indian top order did the heavy lifting. He actually believed his ignorant/dishonest take would go unchallenged.

Back to Pant, losing out on 2 years is not just a setback in terms of his body of work but more importantly his learning curve.
 
Thanks for actually taking the trouble of listing out the scores.

That funny poster did his best to imply that Pant has the kind of record he does because of cashing in after the Indian top order did the heavy lifting. He actually believed his ignorant/dishonest take would go unchallenged.

Back to Pant, losing out on 2 years is not just a setback in terms of his body of work but more importantly his learning curve.
Indian top order reputation is influced by India having a great batting line up in past. I don't think curent batting line up is great one. Often I see Pant, Jadeja, Ashwin etc bailing Indians out.

I think people, who may not have watched enough games recently, carry memory of past and assume that top order is laying solid foundations most of the times. Poster is actually a good one and I don't think he is intentioanlly trying to paint a wrong picture.
 
Saying that Pant is the beneficiary of coming after 300/5 when in fact his entire career is embedded with and his reputation is forged on doing a demolition job *after* Indian top order has failed is NOT an opinion. It's the definition of misrepresenting facts. You will gain nothing from lashing out at me and digging a hole for yourself.
Taking a handful of innings where he saved India doesn't magically make the innings where he failed go away. ...won't change a damn thing because Rizwan is the best wicket-keeper bat going around these days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Taking a handful of innings where he saved India doesn't magically make the innings where he failed go away. .won't change a damn thing because Rizwan is the best wicket-keeper bat going around these days.
Pant chalks up more 50+ scores per test than Rizwan while scoring them 1) quicker, 2) against stronger attack, 3) in tougher conditions and 4) being more impactful. If Pant has scored only a handful then how many has Rizwan scored? Pant has 16 50+ scores in 56 innings compared to Rizwan's 13 in 52 innings. How has Pant only scored a handful but Rizwan (the impactless statpadder) is the best WKeeper bat? LMAO :troll

Pant already has as many GOAT knocks at 27 years of age while missing out on two years due to injury that not a single WKeeper bar Gilchrist has played. At least 3 of Pant's knock will feature among the top 10 knocks played in last 10 years. How many of Rizwan's will?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pant chalks up more 50+ scores per test than Rizwan while scoring them 1) quicker, 2) against stronger attack, 3) in tougher conditions and 4) being more impactful. If Pant has scored only a handful then how many has Rizwan scored? Pant has 16 50+ scores in 56 innings compared to Rizwan's 13 in 52 innings. How has Pant only scored a handful but Rizwan (the impactless statpadder) is the best WKeeper bat? LMAO :troll

Pant already has as many GOAT knocks at 27 years of age while missing out on two years due to injury that not a single WKeeper bar Gilchrist has played. At least 3 of Pant's knock will feature among the top 10 knocks played in last 10 years. How many of Rizwan's will?
Umm...okay. But Rizwan is better and more complete cricketer.
 
Same vibes as ''inzamam is the bhest player of pace'' while averaging in low 20s against best pace attack of his time. :lol
Well I don't remember saying that but considering how you love grouping different people as one I'm not surprised you would say something as ignorant.
 
My God - how much does it hurt Indian fans to see a Pakistani cricketer do genuinely well and be counted amongst the best in the world in his position.
 
Well I don't remember saying that but considering how you love grouping different people as one I'm not surprised you would say something as ignorant.

Just saying you are as special as them holding an opinion with dear life no matter how delusional.

Don't mind yaaaaar!
 
Just saying you are as special as them holding an opinion with dear life no matter how delusional.

Don't mind yaaaaar!
I wasn't the one losing my marbles over someone's opinion yesterday. What surprises me about your reaction is that I never even said that Pant isn't great. I just said Rizwan that is better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn't the one losing my marbles over someone's opinion yesterday. What surprises me about your reaction is that I never even said that Pant isn't great. I just said Rizwan that is better.

Sure buddy. I'll be here to ''lose my marbles'' the next time you peddle an opinion divorced from facts. :excitedtroll
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Klaasen ,Inglis and Phil Salt also

They are world class white ball batters
Same Inglis who averages 22 across 21 one day matches? People throw around the word ''world-class'' too sparingly these days. Its starting to lose meaning. Inglis isn't even the No. 1 wicket-keeper bat in Australia.
 
Sure buddy. I'll be here to ''lose my marbles'' the next time you peddle an opinion divorced from facts. :excitedtroll
You mean the stats that suit your narrative? I said for the outset that Rizwan does not have the benefit of playing for a good team which is what automatically puts him on a different plane and why his runs mean more.

Also, last I checked Rizwan had a better test average than Pant.
 
Same Inglis who averages 22 across 21 one day matches? People throw around the word ''world-class'' too sparingly these days. Its starting to lose meaning. Inglis isn't even the No. 1 wicket-keeper bat in Australia.
It’s not my fault you guys don’t understand the quality of cricketers

Watch this age.
 
It’s not my fault you guys don’t understand the quality of cricketers

Watch this age.
If you think he's a quality player, say he's a quality player. World-class is a tag you can only give to a select. Not everyone can be 'world-class', especially not a 29 year old wicket-keeper who is yet to establish himself for his country in any format.
 
If you think he's a talented player, say he's a talented player. World-class is a tag you can only give to a select. Not everyone can be 'world-class', especially not a 29 year old wicket-keeper who is yet to establish himself for his country in any format.
Josh Inglis is world class. High quality white ball batter

Watch more cricket, not just Pakistan cricket and champions cup
 
Josh Inglis is world class. High quality white ball batter

Watch more cricket, not just Pakistan cricket and champions cup
The fact that you think Josh Inglis is 'world-class' and Rizwan is the spawn of satan says more about the amount of cricket you watch then me lol.

And I would rather watch paint dry then watch the Champions Cup.
 
You mean the stats that suit your narrative? I said for the outset that Rizwan does not have the benefit of playing for a good team which is what automatically puts him on a different plane and why his runs mean more.

Also, last I checked Rizwan had a better test average than Pant.

Lmao, India wouldn't be a good team and would have lost the series in AUS (both Sydney and Brisbane), at home to ENG and in ENG *IF* not for Pant's game changing knocks. Pant IS the reason India competed or won.

Rizwan is not good enough to do what Pant does.

Yes, Rizwan averages less than 1 run higher having played only 10 out of 32 tests in SENA while Pant has played 21 out of his 33 tests in SENA. Also no matches against mighty Zimbabwe for Pant unlike Rizwan.

What an achievement to average 44.xx as opposed to Pant's lowly 43.xx :troll
 
Lmao, India wouldn't be a good team and would have lost the series in AUS (both Sydney and Brisbane), at home to ENG and in ENG *IF* not for Pant's game changing knocks. Pant IS the reason India competed or won.

Rizwan is not good enough to do what Pant does.

Yes, Rizwan averages less than 1 run higher having played only 10 out of 32 tests in SENA while Pant has played 21 out of his 33 tests in SENA. Also no matches against mighty Zimbabwe for Pant unlike Rizwan.

What an achievement to average 44.xx as opposed to Pant's lowly 43.xx :troll
Pant was great and certainly ended up playing a critical role in that series but it was the collective efforts of the team that won that series. You could argue alot of things. I could argue that without Rahane playing that series turning knock in the 2nd test, India would never even have gotten to the point of being in a position to win that series.

But anyway, none of this has anything to do with Rizwan being a better cricketer than Pant.
 
Pant was great and certainly ended up playing a critical role in that series but it was the collective efforts of the team that won that series. You could argue alot of things. I could argue that without Rahane playing that series turning knock in the 2nd test, India would never even have gotten to the point of being in a position to win that series.

But anyway, none of this has anything to do with Rizwan being a better cricketer than Pant.

Yes, cricket is a team game and the collective effort is what matters but there are players with an oversized impact on the game. Pant is one of those rare cricketers. Pant is a galaxy away from Rizwan because despite his best years still to come AND having lost two prime years to injuries, he has already played knocks that will be listed among the best of the best this century.
 
Pant has scored 6 fest century vs Bangladesh in 1st test match at Chennai .

This is first test after horrific accident.
 
I didn't want to opportunistically bump this thread today but here we are.

We get to see what Pant can do (after a 2 year break) when he plays in home conditions (far from benign) with his team comfortably placed.

BTW, @RedwoodOriginal how about that average now? You were pumped up about that fractionally high average :troll
 
Pant is actually better than what his average suggests. He is truly the best keeper batsman to come since Gilchrist.
 
But is he the best all format keeper though?

No he isn’t!

Best All formats keeper - Not yet

He had found his feat in ODIs though before that accident. That hundred vs England was top class.

Now, question is who is current best all formats keeper then?
 
Pant has played over 60 percent of his tests in SENA.

In contrast, even someone like Gilchrist played less than 20 percent of his tests in subcontinent and only 7 in India.

Anyone judging Pant by average is plain dishonest.
 
I didn't want to opportunistically bump this thread today but here we are.

We get to see what Pant can do (after a 2 year break) when he plays in home conditions (far from benign) with his team comfortably placed.

BTW, @RedwoodOriginal how about that average now? You were pumped up about that fractionally high average :troll
I'm sure his average looks great after this knock. He's a fantastic player! Just not as good as Rizwan.
 
I didn't want to opportunistically bump this thread today but here we are.

We get to see what Pant can do (after a 2 year break) when he plays in home conditions (far from benign) with his team comfortably placed.

BTW, @RedwoodOriginal how about that average now? You were pumped up about that fractionally high average :troll
Pant is not care about milestone or average .

He was dismissed 7th time in 90s in test cricket by playing attacking shots

Today could have been not out to boost the average but chose to attacking mindset .
 
Pant is not care about milestone or average .

He was dismissed 7th time in 90s in test cricket by playing attacking shots

Today could have been not out to boost the average but chose to attacking mindset .

True, he's a lot like Sehwag and Gichrist. Raw numbers are awesome but their impact is so much more.
 
Rizwan is a good batsman by current Pakistani standards, but Pant is an ATG in making. The gulf is as wide as Shaheen-Bumrah comparison.
 
It seems like the world will collapse if we dont do a comparison thread. Here is my 2 cents.

We live in an era where we are fortunate to see so many quality w/k batters. Pant has massively improved as a keeper in recent times. I thought his career was over after that accident but boy he is made of metal and has come back stronger.

Riz on the other hand is the lone warrior who possesses less abilities but has succeeded through sheer hard work and determination.

I love both Pant & Riz.
 
It seems like the world will collapse if we dont do a comparison thread. Here is my 2 cents.

We live in an era where we are fortunate to see so many quality w/k batters. Pant has massively improved as a keeper in recent times. I thought his career was over after that accident but boy he is made of metal and has come back stronger.

Riz on the other hand is the lone warrior who possesses less abilities but has succeeded through sheer hard work and determination.

I love both Pant & Riz.
You should argue…

Does Rizwan have Kohli, Sharma, Gill, Rahul, Jaiswal to support him? No he doesn’t! He is the Kohli/Sharma/Gill and Jaiswal. He is the one man force!
 
I'm sure his average looks great after this knock. He's a fantastic player! Just not as good as Rizwan.

Agree.

Pant has higher average than Rizwan despite playing on tougher Test wickets.

Pant has more Test hundreds than Rizwan.

Pant has more impactful and match winning Test knocks than Rizwan.

Pant is also a good 6 years younger than Rizwan.

But still Rizwan is better and more tailunted because he's a Pakistani.

@Nikhil_cric @Hitman @Romali_rotti
 
Agree.

Pant has higher average than Rizwan despite playing on tougher Test wickets.

Pant has more Test hundreds than Rizwan.

Pant has more impactful and match winning Test knocks than Rizwan.

Pant is also a good 6 years younger than Rizwan.

But still Rizwan is better and more tailunted because he's a Pakistani.

@Nikhil_cric @Hitman @Romali_rotti
Pakistani batsmen are by default more talented and better match winners than Indian batsmen.
 
Pakistani batsmen are by default more talented and better match winners than Indian batsmen.
@ChennaiFan - You're laughing at my post? Remember , I mean Inzamam was always more talented and a better match winner than Tendulkar?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rizwan has that fighting spirit along with his antics which makes cricket intersting to watch ..Pant is real steel so far in his short career..Difference between two is there is no one even in Indian team who can impact a match situation like pant usually do..Rizwan is a good player but his impact on the match situation is not anywhere near pant..
 
Pant is clearly ahead now. :inti

Pant has total 6 tons now.

5 of them were against Australia (1), England(3)and South Africa (1).

The 6th one has come against Bangladesh. He was always operating at a different level in Test cricket. Aside of those tons, his two most memorable knocks, 97 at Sydney and 89* at Brisbane are not even centuries.
 
Rizwan is a great player for Pakistan. To me he is the best player in Pakistan and the most dependable. Always a fighter.

Pant is explosive. He is showing great consistency in Tests. The rest of the formats he is still questionable.

At this point, if I am starting a team, I will take Rizwan in LOI. Pant will be the choice for Tests obviously.

In a year or two from now, Pant will become clear choice in all formats.
 
Pant was out of international cricket for more than 1.5 year still he is a beast in test cricket .

Rizwan is also very good player for Pakistan .
 
Agree.

Pant has higher average than Rizwan despite playing on tougher Test wickets.

Pant has more Test hundreds than Rizwan.

Pant has more impactful and match winning Test knocks than Rizwan.

Pant is also a good 6 years younger than Rizwan.

But still Rizwan is better and more tailunted because he's a Pakistani.

@Nikhil_cric @Hitman @Romali_rotti
Good on you for finally admitting it
 
Pant’s greatest achievement is badly exposing Dhoni’s mediocrity.
The only people who 'expose' their agendas are the ones who partake in constant Dhoni bashing.

You must have really seethed in agony when Dhoni blasted 148 in 153 balls in Faisalabad, 2006, smashing Shoaib Akhtar to all parts of the ground. India was trailing by 308 runs when he came to the crease, by the way.

He also scored 76 not out at Lords, 2007 to make India win its first test series in England since the 80s.

What about 224 vs Australia when he came to the crease with India 180 runs in the arrears? That score came off 265 balls. Of course, that's also conveniently forgotten.

He has many other fighting knocks overseas when the Indian team struggled, which I could list separately.

Pant is better than Dhoni in Tests, yes, but Dhoni is the undisputed GOAT wicketkeeper batsman in ODIs and T20s (for India). He'd make the all-time XI in white ball cricket for his captaincy skills alone, forget the overall package.

Pant, as great as he is, and I love his batting, is not a patch on Dhoni in white ball cricket.
 
Just to make it clear, Dhoni would make the all-time world ODI XI, across eras, as a wicketkeeper-batsman alone. He'd also be the most 'obvious' choice for captaincy in white ball cricket.

To denigrate his credentials is perhaps a fad these days but ask Pant who his 'idol' is, and that'll finish the debate right there.

Forget Pant, ask any cricket experts, from past to the present, across the globe and they'll tell you exactly what MS Dhoni means to white ball cricket.

He wasn't a slouch in Test cricket either, as his record amply suggests.
 
@ChennaiFan - You're laughing at my post? Remember , I mean Inzamam was always more talented and a better match winner than Tendulkar?
@Hitman I was not laughing to mock or sarcastically. I liked the way you said it. It is true about some posters here or ex Pakistani players including Imran.
Unfortunately, the laughing emoji is used in negative manner here and that has probably caused the confusion. Rest assured, I agreed with you and I liked your post.
 
Pant is a bilateral specialist. He is yet to play a meaningful knock in a World Cup or a WTC final.

Rizwan has played quite a few good knocks in World Cups. 152/0, for example.

Pant reminds me of Wayne Rooney.
 
Only reason Rizwans ahead in his books is due to one factor and one factor only-religion.

The fact that its brought up a T20 game is because it suits him currently, else when India had won T20 WC he discounted it as a non serious event in grand scheme of things.

Problems with him is that their hypocrisy catches up with them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pant is a bilateral specialist. He is yet to play a meaningful knock in a World Cup or a WTC final.

Rizwan has played quite a few good knocks in World Cups. 152/0, for example.

Pant reminds me of Wayne Rooney.
Will take his continued excellence in the premier version of the game any time.
 
@Hitman I was not laughing to mock or sarcastically. I liked the way you said it. It is true about some posters here or ex Pakistani players including Imran.
Unfortunately, the laughing emoji is used in negative manner here and that has probably caused the confusion. Rest assured, I agreed with you and I liked your post.
I was being sarcastic with you. I fully knew your intentions :ROFLMAO:
 
Pant is a bilateral specialist. He is yet to play a meaningful knock in a World Cup or a WTC final.

Rizwan has played quite a few good knocks in World Cups. 152/0, for example.

Pant reminds me of Wayne Rooney.

Agree.

Rizwan with so many "meaningful" knocks have won so many countless world cups for Pakistan while Pant has won just one World Cup. Sad to see. :(
 
I like Rizwan.

But what Pant did in some tests V Aus is beyond anything Rizwan has achieved at the moment.

Pant probably isn't maximising his potential, he seems quite lazy and unmotivated at times to me but is still very very good.
 
Pant has played over 60 percent of his tests in SENA.

In contrast, even someone like Gilchrist played less than 20 percent of his tests in subcontinent and only 7 in India.

Anyone judging Pant by average is plain dishonest.
I guess he is the type of player who ll avg less at home because Australian pitches suit him more. I might be wrong but i see him doing well in sena as compared to india
 
Back
Top