What's new

The decline of Cricinfo and their obsession with India: A disservice to global fans

Cricinfo stopped pretending to be a global cricket website a decade ago if not longer.

Osman and Daniyal are good but I can just follow them on X, I rarely open the website directly anymore and definitely not for updates on Pak cricket.
 
This is false.
Pak cricket is going through nazuk soratehal but that’s ALWAYS been the case. This is what being a pak cricket fan is about. Our cricket is a reflection of our country and we own it. Proud of what we bring to world cricket.

Oh yeah we love Indian cricket too.
Kohli is a superstar in Pak regardless and he’s a superstar here on PP. but so are AB, Lara, McGrath and so on… you get the point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Obaidd said:
This is false.
Pak cricket is going through nazuk soratehal but that’s ALWAYS been the case. This is what being a pak cricket fan is about. Our cricket is a reflection of our country and we own it. Proud of what we bring to world cricket.

Oh yeah we love Indian cricket too.
Kohli is a superstar in Pak regardless and he’s a superstar here on PP. but so are AB, Lara, McGrath and so on… you get the point.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure why my previous quote was deleted, but let me try to put it in a sophisticated way..I appreciate you people celebrated Kohli..I appreciate the passion of all Pak cricket fans who look for the betterment of their team..but following this forum over years, what I observed was only constant comparisons of Pak players with Indian players, downplaying the emergence of any Indian cricketer, conspiracy theories, topics or post solely created to trigger Indians,..etc..the same celebrated Kohli was also ridiculed many times and was sinfully compared with Babar azam who is not even half his talent..your ecosystem revolves around India and off late the obsession has turned into a frustration and anger..there are other political things which I would not like to speak as this is not the right forum..just to put in simple words, stop blaming India and BCCI for everything and focus just on your cricket team, there are million things to fix..If your cricket improves, then your stature and status will also improve..that's what India did in last 15-20 years..Be a worthy rival first before fighting with us..
 
Rafale Nidhal said:
Global should be giving preference to ICC news and International cricket.
Click to expand...
Curious what news would come out of the ICC. Because the people there actually have work for something to happen.

For now they are just perfectly happy sitting on their rear ends and cashing that BCCI check.
 
BDfanforever said:
IPL and WIPL is not till next year, but knowing what's on Ashwin mind for CSK is very important news 1 year ahead of time.
Click to expand...
May not be important for you. May be important for few others. CSK has a massive fan base. What is next? Twitter is not trending Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe match?
 
chakdeindian said:
No one globally cares about Pakistan cricket except Pakistanis..As long as it is showing as priority in pakistan edition, there should not be any concerns..
Click to expand...
Tell that to BCCI who don’t have the balls to avoid playing Pakistan because of the money it brings them.

BCCI got bullied into moving the Asia Cup to India because Pakistan cannot play in India, whereas the so-called richest and most powerful board could have stood its ground and stayed adamant that the Asia Cup will continue to be played in India without the participation of Pakistan.
 
chakdeindian said:
No one globally cares about Pakistan cricket except Pakistanis..As long as it is showing as priority in pakistan edition, there should not be any concerns..
Click to expand...
Who made you the arbiter of what global cricket fans should or shouldn't care about ? Countries like Sudan and Afghanistan are largely globally irrelevant, yet the major news networks still cover events in those nations and send reporters there. I doubt it's a profitable venture for them, but that's part of their remit.

Let's try an experiment and read Cricinfo's homepage. Even if you change the priority to Africa, the lead top story is "R Ashwin asks CSK for clarity ahead of IPL 2026."

If you click on Editor's Picks, we see the latest articles from their writers. 40% of the 20 features on Page 1 are about an Indian series, IPL or WPL. The headline advertising their latest Quiz - "Which Indian player was banned for two years in 2019 for age fraud ?" - wow if ever there was an enticing advertisement for a quiz.

Their quote of the day at the bottom of the page is from, of course, Shubman Gill.

Again, this is the Africa Edition. I completely appreciate the commercial reality that Indian finance and Indian audiences underpin the global game (BTW it's a disservice to many Indian fans to assume they wish to consume Indian team fluff pieces 24/7 and aren't interested in events elsewhere). However, Cricinfo should be honest with its audience and stop pretending to be the custodians of the global game or journalists who hold the powerful accountable because those days are long gone.
 
Looking at Cricbuzz, I'm pleasantly surprised by their homepage. The lead article is on two tier Tests. There's a former WI cricketer with a piece on the crisis in Caribbean cricket, another piece on bat manufacturing and one on Marnus Labuschagne's position in the Australian Test team.

The three featured videos in the sidebar are all Indian-centric, which is fine, it's an Indian website at the end of the day. However the rest of the news are a nice spread of global cricket news.

So really the issue is Cricinfo and their embarrassingly one-sided content.
 
Mamoon said:
Tell that to BCCI who don’t have the balls to avoid playing Pakistan because of the money it brings them.

BCCI got bullied into moving the Asia Cup to India because Pakistan cannot play in India, whereas the so-called richest and most powerful board could have stood its ground and stayed adamant that the Asia Cup will continue to be played in India without the participation of Pakistan.
Click to expand...
Oh..mensa certified genius..!! How many points did you reduce today to type the below incorrect sentence sir..
Mamoon said:
BCCI got bullied into moving the Asia Cup to India
Click to expand...
I agree for once that BCCI should have boycotted this Asian Cup..but as I had mentioned in another post, BCCI means business and they only work to fuel the cricket and keep International cricket alive for their larger perspective..No one can bully BCCI. Last time a team tried to do their way in CT and you know what happened..let's see, always BCCI is known for giving some sucker punch to Pakistan at the last moment like it did in CT2025..wait and watch
 
Markhor said:
Who made you the arbiter of what global cricket fans should or shouldn't care about ? Countries like Sudan and Afghanistan are largely globally irrelevant, yet the major news networks still cover events in those nations and send reporters there. I doubt it's a profitable venture for them, but that's part of their remit.

Let's try an experiment and read Cricinfo's homepage. Even if you change the priority to Africa, the lead top story is "R Ashwin asks CSK for clarity ahead of IPL 2026."

If you click on Editor's Picks, we see the latest articles from their writers. 40% of the 20 features on Page 1 are about an Indian series, IPL or WPL. The headline advertising their latest Quiz - "Which Indian player was banned for two years in 2019 for age fraud ?" - wow if ever there was an enticing advertisement for a quiz.

Their quote of the day at the bottom of the page is from, of course, Shubman Gill.

Again, this is the Africa Edition. I completely appreciate the commercial reality that Indian finance and Indian audiences underpin the global game (BTW it's a disservice to many Indian fans to assume they wish to consume Indian team fluff pieces 24/7 and aren't interested in events elsewhere). However, Cricinfo should be honest with its audience and stop pretending to be the custodians of the global game or journalists who hold the powerful accountable because those days are long gone.
Click to expand...

Not accurate. Africa edition has OZ vs SA series in top
 
Markhor said:
Looking at Cricbuzz, I'm pleasantly surprised by their homepage. The lead article is on two tier Tests. There's a former WI cricketer with a piece on the crisis in Caribbean cricket, another piece on bat manufacturing and one on Marnus Labuschagne's position in the Australian Test team.

The three featured videos in the sidebar are all Indian-centric, which is fine, it's an Indian website at the end of the day. However the rest of the news are a nice spread of global cricket news.

So really the issue is Cricinfo and their embarrassingly one-sided content.
Click to expand...
Cricbuzz is, frankly, a terrible website; cluttered content, a dreadful color scheme, and a UI/UX that feels like it was designed to actively repel readers. Also, I can’t take any site seriously that hides articles behind a paywall.

ESPNCricinfo isn’t perfect, but it remains the best cricket website. As I said before, like any business, their strategy is heavily geared towards the audience that brings them the most revenue, which is why their coverage of Indian cricket far outshines everything else. That said, I still visit it regularly because they employ some of the finest cricket writers, people whose opinions I genuinely value, like Osman Samiuddin, Sid Monga, Andrew Fidel Fernando. A few of their English writers are solid too. And of course, the UI doesn’t give you eye cancer.
 
We need a cricket website that is neutral.

Cricinfo and Cricbuzz are practically Indian sites/Indian propaganda mouthpieces. :inti
 
chakdeindian said:
I'm not sure why my previous quote was deleted, but let me try to put it in a sophisticated way..I appreciate you people celebrated Kohli..I appreciate the passion of all Pak cricket fans who look for the betterment of their team..but following this forum over years, what I observed was only constant comparisons of Pak players with Indian players, downplaying the emergence of any Indian cricketer, conspiracy theories, topics or post solely created to trigger Indians,..etc..the same celebrated Kohli was also ridiculed many times and was sinfully compared with Babar azam who is not even half his talent..your ecosystem revolves around India and off late the obsession has turned into a frustration and anger..there are other political things which I would not like to speak as this is not the right forum..just to put in simple words, stop blaming India and BCCI for everything and focus just on your cricket team, there are million things to fix..If your cricket improves, then your stature and status will also improve..that's what India did in last 15-20 years..Be a worthy rival first before fighting with us..
Click to expand...

Yes we compare our players to Indian players. There are dozens of such threads on PP but many created by Indian posters too.

As the centre of power in cricket yeah sure responsibility for where cricket is today should lie with BCCI.

There are lots of threads here on PP that discuss lots of different things in cricket and beyond. The obsession with India is very real but trust me a lot of it is banter.
It’s a sports forum at the end of the day and this is how rivalries go.

It is to PP’s credit that fans from across the globe visit this forum. Not just to check the pulse on Pak cricket and our special relationship with Indian cricket but there are threads on series happening from around the world right now.

PP’s coverage is so diverse in spite of being a Pak forum. As I said earlier, Cricinfo stopped pretending to be a global cricket forum at least a decade ago.
 
RedwoodOriginal said:
Cricbuzz is, frankly, a terrible website; cluttered content, a dreadful color scheme, and a UI/UX that feels like it was designed to actively repel readers. Also, I can’t take any site seriously that hides articles behind a paywall.

ESPNCricinfo isn’t perfect, but it remains the best cricket website. As I said before, like any business, their strategy is heavily geared towards the audience that brings them the most revenue, which is why their coverage of Indian cricket far outshines everything else. That said, I still visit it regularly because they employ some of the finest cricket writers, people whose opinions I genuinely value, like Osman Samiuddin, Sid Monga, Andrew Fidel Fernando. A few of their English writers are solid too. And of course, the UI doesn’t give you eye cancer.
Click to expand...
Yes, but all of that becomes moot if they are going to brand themselves as "ESPN Cricinfo" i.e. Global, but 90% of content and coverage is geared toward one type of audience.

They should have separate dedicated website and title it something like "ESPN Indian CricInfo". They are absolutely welcome to post all the WPL, what's on Ashwin's mind, Day in the life of Indian Crickter, etc.
 
BDfanforever said:
Yes, but all of that becomes moot if they are going to brand themselves as "ESPN Cricinfo" i.e. Global, but 90% of content and coverage is geared toward one type of audience.

They should have separate dedicated website and title it something like "ESPN Indian CricInfo". They are absolutely welcome to post all the WPL, what's on Ashwin's mind, Day in the life of Indian Crickter, etc.
Click to expand...
Well cricket is also regarded as a 'global sport', but we all know that it is a completely Indian-dominated sport at this point. It’s run by Indians, watched mostly by Indians, and the biggest profits are made by Indians. So it shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that the biggest cricket website in the world is also tailored first and foremost to that audience.
 
Markhor said:
Who made you the arbiter of what global cricket fans should or shouldn't care about ?
Click to expand...
I'm not an arbitrator but an observer..an observer need not be made..
Markhor said:
Countries like Sudan and Afghanistan are largely globally irrelevant, yet the major news networks still cover events in those nations and send reporters there. I doubt it's a profitable venture for them, but that's part of their remit.
Click to expand...
Im not clear are you referring to cricket or global politics..if its global politics every country is relevant and the news channel cover only the news that is globally relevant..and even in that these news won't come in prime time slots or breaking news..w.r.t cricket it's the same concept, reports and reporters are present for all countries but priority is given based on viewership..
 
chakdeindian said:
Oh..mensa certified genius..!! How many points did you reduce today to type the below incorrect sentence sir..

I agree for once that BCCI should have boycotted this Asian Cup..but as I had mentioned in another post, BCCI means business and they only work to fuel the cricket and keep International cricket alive for their larger perspective..No one can bully BCCI. Last time a team tried to do their way in CT and you know what happened..let's see, always BCCI is known for giving some sucker punch to Pakistan at the last moment like it did in CT2025..wait and watch
Click to expand...
I didn’t say anything incorrect. You are just in denial.

India was the one that isolated itself when it came to the CT. They peddled the narrative that Pakistan isn’t safe to travel, but no other cricket board gave a damn about India’s sentiment and played their respective matches in Pakistan.

India ended up playing their own matches in the UAE, whereas their expectation was that other boards will also refuse to play in Pakistan. That didn’t happen.

In the Asia Cup, PCB did what BCCI failed to do in the CT; they forced the whole tournament out of India.

What stopped BCCI and other teams from playing their matches in India with only Pakistan playing their matches in the UAE?
 
RedwoodOriginal said:
Well cricket is also regarded as a 'global sport', but we all know it is a completely Indian-dominated sport at this point. It’s run by Indians, watched mostly by Indians, and the biggest profits are made by Indians. So it shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that the biggest cricket website in the world is also tailored first and foremost to that audience.
Click to expand...

I think BDfanforever, Markhor and others are reminiscing about the golden days from around 2006- 2010 when there still was significant coverage of international cricket involving Pakistan & West Indies in addition to Big 3 countries.

That era is long gone. International cricket's importance has reduced significantly, leagues have grown and there is significant women's cricket coverage now as well.

And their editorial policies over the years have reflected these changes imo .
 
Nikhil_cric said:
I think BDfanforever, Markhor and others are reminiscing about the golden days from around 2006- 2010 when there still was significant coverage of international cricket involving Pakistan & West Indies in addition to Big 3 countries.

That era is long gone. International cricket's importance has reduced significantly, leagues have grown and there is significant women's cricket coverage now as well.

And their editorial policies over the years have reflected these changes imo .
Click to expand...
Above all, it's no longer owned by the people who started the website. It's owned by a giant corporation that wants a return on its investment. Even if it's editors want to give more lime-light to other countries, ultimately they are beholden to their corporate bosses.
 
RedwoodOriginal said:
Above all, it's no longer owned by the people who started the website. It's owned by a giant corporation that wants a return on its investment. Even if it's editors want to give more lime-light to other countries, ultimately they are beholden to their corporate bosses.
Click to expand...
It’s editorial team is so biased and has a narrow outlook imo. I’d stop reading at Sambit Bal..
 
sweep_shot said:
I use Cricinfo just to check scores.

I don't care about the articles and haven't read those articles in a long time. Those articles tend to be biased and low-quality like the Indian media. :inti
Click to expand...
Honestly, difficult to find mature writing on cricinfo.
 
chakdeindian said:
I'm not an arbitrator but an observer..an observer need not be made..

Im not clear are you referring to cricket or global politics..if its global politics every country is relevant and the news channel cover only the news that is globally relevant..and even in that these news won't come in prime time slots or breaking news..w.r.t cricket it's the same concept, reports and reporters are present for all countries but priority is given based on viewership..
Click to expand...
This goes back to my earlier point. Cricinfo, unlike other cricket websites, profits from its reputation as the longest running and most definitive online source for world cricket news. Its a pioneer in its field and holds a unique respect amongst fans.

Therefore it has a responsibility to reasonably cover the global game. As stated above, even after switching editions to your preferred region, it's disproportionately Indian centric.

Let's take the NBC News website (not endorsing them, just using as an example). It's a commercial American news outlet. I fully expect an American slant given the overwhelmingly majority of its audience are American. Yet you can find plenty of articles on events from Africa to Asia to South America. I doubt these drive much traffic or generate much revenue - but if you claim to report world news, then report world news.

Cricinfo's coverage of non-Big 3 nations has dwindled to perfunctory match previews and reviews, squad announcements and hirings/firings. I get for most casuals that's enough - but gone are the deep dives, investigative reports or regular long-form interviews that distinguished Cricinfo from the rest.

It doesn't even have a native correspondent for New Zealand, West Indies, Zimbabwe and Afghanistan. NZ literally won the WTC four years ago and regularly competes in ICC finals ! WI have tons of writers and podcasters they could employ. ZIM barely plays any cricket - would it bankrupt Cricinfo to pay a local reporter for a piece every few months ? They cohost the next ODI WC ! AFG are literally the biggest success story of Associate cricket in years, and reached the SF of T20 WC last year. Also voiceless.

Thankfully Cricinfo's monopoly is over and outlets like YouTube, podcasts, forums, and blog spaces are filling the vacuum.
 
I only visit cricinfo for live scores. I pretty muchstopped reading their articles about 20 years ago. May read the odd one here and there, but so cringe. It’s all nerdy Indian stat comparisons, wannabe freshie and cringe wit in articles and all sorts of other useless nonsense.

Note to authors just write a decent article and don’t attempt to be funny / witty
 
sweep_shot said:
I use Cricinfo just to check scores.

I don't care about the articles and haven't read those articles in a long time. Those articles tend to be biased and low-quality like the Indian media. :inti
Click to expand...

Obaidd said:
Honestly, difficult to find mature writing on cricinfo.
Click to expand...
Like freedom of speech, there is also freedom of choice. Simple solution, just don't go to the website. There are other cricket websites.

I am sure PP will welcome more eyeballs time on the site.
 
TheSultan said:
I only visit cricinfo for live scores. I pretty muchstopped reading their articles about 20 years ago. May read the odd one here and there, but so cringe. It’s all nerdy Indian stat comparisons, wannabe freshie and cringe wit in articles and all sorts of other useless nonsense.

Note to authors just write a decent article and don’t attempt to be funny / witty
Click to expand...
There are other sites for scores too. So, easy to avoid the website all together.
 
sweep_shot said:
I use Cricinfo just to check scores.

I don't care about the articles and haven't read those articles in a long time. Those articles tend to be biased and low-quality like the Indian media. :inti
Click to expand...

Same but lately IndiaInfo is not even good for that, the scorecard page keeps sort of fluttering for me
 
Markhor said:
This goes back to my earlier point. Cricinfo, unlike other cricket websites, profits from its reputation as the longest running and most definitive online source for world cricket news. Its a pioneer in its field and holds a unique respect amongst fans.

Therefore it has a responsibility to reasonably cover the global game. As stated above, even after switching editions to your preferred region, it's disproportionately Indian centric.

Let's take the NBC News website (not endorsing them, just using as an example). It's a commercial American news outlet. I fully expect an American slant given the overwhelmingly majority of its audience are American. Yet you can find plenty of articles on events from Africa to Asia to South America. I doubt these drive much traffic or generate much revenue - but if you claim to report world news, then report world news.

Cricinfo's coverage of non-Big 3 nations has dwindled to perfunctory match previews and reviews, squad announcements and hirings/firings. I get for most casuals that's enough - but gone are the deep dives, investigative reports or regular long-form interviews that distinguished Cricinfo from the rest.

It doesn't even have a native correspondent for New Zealand, West Indies, Zimbabwe and Afghanistan. NZ literally won the WTC four years ago and regularly competes in ICC finals ! WI have tons of writers and podcasters they could employ. ZIM barely plays any cricket - would it bankrupt Cricinfo to pay a local reporter for a piece every few months ? They cohost the next ODI WC ! AFG are literally the biggest success story of Associate cricket in years, and reached the SF of T20 WC last year. Also voiceless.

Thankfully Cricinfo's monopoly is over and outlets like YouTube, podcasts, forums, and blog spaces are filling the vacuum.
Click to expand...
Excellent points.

Unfortunately, the podcasts, forums are started with certain content and eventually end up catering to the largest audience. Dare I say, even PP has become very India centric! :)
 
TheSultan said:
It’s all nerdy Indian stat comparisons, wannabe freshie and cringe wit in articles and all sorts of other useless nonsense.

Note to authors just write a decent article and don’t attempt to be funny / witty
Click to expand...

This is so accurate. Those guys try too hard plus there is too many of them.
 
Pakistan youtubers lol They talk more about Indian cricket too. Wonder why? They extensively covered the India vs England series. They provided their comments every day about the series. This whole thread is about India. When you are guilty of the same why blame others?
 
RedwoodOriginal said:
Above all, it's no longer owned by the people who started the website. It's owned by a giant corporation that wants a return on its investment. Even if it's editors want to give more lime-light to other countries, ultimately they are beholden to their corporate bosses.
Click to expand...
One more issue is that its just like any other foreign mnc company invested something in india to reek the profits .they will beat the crap out of employees for that.Its all about data collection too.if there are more number of users for one section, they will load that's section on page load itself . it will enhance user experience for that section(Amazon,ebay etc will load specific user preferences on their behaviour basis). Its similar to super market loading all their front aisles with chocolates and snacks so that our kids will see and harass us.
 
Vikram1989 said:
One more issue is that its just like any other foreign mnc company invested something in india to reek the profits .they will beat the crap out of employees for that.Its all about data collection too.if there are more number of users for one section, they will load that's section on page load itself . it will enhance user experience for that section(Amazon,ebay etc will load specific user preferences on their behaviour basis). Its similar to super market loading all their front aisles with chocolates and snacks so that our kids will see and harass us.
Click to expand...
Sure, and no one is saying ESPN cannot do that. They absolutely can, just open up another website "ESPN Indian Cricinfo" and load it up al you want. However, here, they are completely misleading rest of their other user base. There are total 610+ Million population across rest of Cricket nations, and currencies in some of those countries are 100x of rupees.
 
Markhor said:
This goes back to my earlier point. Cricinfo, unlike other cricket websites, profits from its reputation as the longest running and most definitive online source for world cricket news. Its a pioneer in its field and holds a unique respect amongst fans.

Therefore it has a responsibility to reasonably cover the global game. As stated above, even after switching editions to your preferred region, it's disproportionately Indian centric.

Let's take the NBC News website (not endorsing them, just using as an example). It's a commercial American news outlet. I fully expect an American slant given the overwhelmingly majority of its audience are American. Yet you can find plenty of articles on events from Africa to Asia to South America. I doubt these drive much traffic or generate much revenue - but if you claim to report world news, then report world news.

Cricinfo's coverage of non-Big 3 nations has dwindled to perfunctory match previews and reviews, squad announcements and hirings/firings. I get for most casuals that's enough - but gone are the deep dives, investigative reports or regular long-form interviews that distinguished Cricinfo from the rest.

It doesn't even have a native correspondent for New Zealand, West Indies, Zimbabwe and Afghanistan. NZ literally won the WTC four years ago and regularly competes in ICC finals ! WI have tons of writers and podcasters they could employ. ZIM barely plays any cricket - would it bankrupt Cricinfo to pay a local reporter for a piece every few months ? They cohost the next ODI WC ! AFG are literally the biggest success story of Associate cricket in years, and reached the SF of T20 WC last year. Also voiceless.

Thankfully Cricinfo's monopoly is over and outlets like YouTube, podcasts, forums, and blog spaces are filling the vacuum.
Click to expand...
You’re comparing apples to oranges.
A global news media outlet exists to report worldwide news for a broad audience. Their editorial model is entirely different.
Even there, when I visited NBC News as you cited, the top 3 headlines were on Trump, not on “balanced global coverage.” And when I checked their sports section, cricket was barely mentioned despite West Indies matches going on — because their target market doesn’t care.

Cricinfo is not a generic news site — it’s a cricket-specific vertical created by ESPN.
To my knowledge, ESPN hasn’t created dedicated standalone sites for other sports in this way. The reason is obvious: cricket’s disproportionate following in South Asia, especially India, which makes up the overwhelming share of traffic.

This is a for-profit operation, not a non-profit newsroom. Decisions on:

Which countries get in-depth coverage

How many correspondents are hired

Which stories get priority

…are made on data-driven audience analytics, viewership stats, and cost–benefit analysis.

And yes, with streaming, YouTube, and social media, long-form written coverage is losing relevance. Most visitors check scores, stats, and ball-by-ball commentary — the site’s core traffic driver. Expecting them to bankroll multiple full-time correspondents in low-traffic cricket nations isn’t realistic.
 
chakdeindian said:
And yes, with streaming, YouTube, and social media, long-form written coverage is losing relevance. Most visitors check scores, stats, and ball-by-ball commentary — the site’s core traffic driver. Expecting them to bankroll multiple full-time correspondents in low-traffic cricket nations isn’t realistic.
Click to expand...
Right, but that is hard to do when the scores from non India are getting hidden somewhere in the corner. Total population in other Cricketing countries is 610+ million plus. That is quite substantial amount especially when you factor in currency in England, Aus, NZ.
 
BDfanforever said:
Right, but that is hard to do when the scores from non India are getting hidden somewhere in the corner. Total population in other Cricketing countries is 610+ million plus. That is quite substantial amount especially when you factor in currency in England, Aus, NZ.
Click to expand...
This has been answered already by many..please visit country specific pages ..
 
BDfanforever said:
Sure, and no one is saying ESPN cannot do that. They absolutely can, just open up another website "ESPN Indian Cricinfo" and load it up al you want. However, here, they are completely misleading rest of their other user base. There are total 610+ Million population across rest of Cricket nations, and currencies in some of those countries are 100x of rupees.
Click to expand...
You are pretending to be naive or you are actually naive? If they completely abandon other internationals without covering you have a point. Don't add 610 million with you lol You are just one person. HOw many do actually think it is an issue apart from you and your friends in this forum. You have data on that? No. Nobody from Australia, England, NZ or SA cry about that. They have their own media fox sports, sports24 etc. Nobody outside this thread has any issues. Bangladesh cricket forum. what happened to that? It is closed now. Cricinfo covers every cricketing event. They appoint two sorry guys for commentary. Poor guys have to watch some real low quality matches fully and comment about it.
 
jnaveen1980 said:
You are pretending to be naive or you are actually naive? If they completely abandon other internationals without covering you have a point. Don't add 610 million with you lol You are just one person. HOw many do actually think it is an issue apart from you and your friends in this forum. You have data on that? No. Nobody from Australia, England, NZ or SA cry about that. They have their own media fox sports, sports24 etc. Nobody outside this thread has any issues. Bangladesh cricket forum. what happened to that? It is closed now. Cricinfo covers every cricketing event. They appoint two sorry guys for commentary. Poor guys have to watch some real low quality matches fully and comment about it.
Click to expand...
They were always bias towards Indian team in their coverage, however, until recently I didnt really have lot of issues. However, its starting to get out of hands now. The article and coverage that really bothered me was regarding whats on Ashwin's mind even though IPL is like one year away. Also, how WIPL starting to get way more coverage than Mens International's.
 
BDfanforever said:
Sure, and no one is saying ESPN cannot do that. They absolutely can, just open up another website "ESPN Indian Cricinfo" and load it up al you want. However, here, they are completely misleading rest of their other user base. There are total 610+ Million population across rest of Cricket nations, and currencies in some of those countries are 100x of rupees.
Click to expand...
Last time when two countries with 420 million population had a series, broadcast rights were difficult to sold .at the end they were so cheap that that bcb director said its an insult even to say the amount.


en.bddigest.com

No One Shows Interest in Broadcasting Bangladesh-Pakistan Series - BDDiGEST

Share this NewsSports Desk The Pakistan cricket team is coming to Bangladesh next week for a three-match T20 series. The matches will be played at the Sher-e-Bangla Cricket Stadium in Mirpur. However, no Bangladeshi TV channel is showing interest in broadcasting the series. The main reason is...
en.bddigest.com en.bddigest.com

If u want to sell any product, consumer should have ability, interest and appetite to buy it.its economics and marketing basic principle.population and currency value dont decide that.
 
Mamoon said:
I didn’t say anything incorrect. You are just in denial.

India was the one that isolated itself when it came to the CT. They peddled the narrative that Pakistan isn’t safe to travel, but no other cricket board gave a damn about India’s sentiment and played their respective matches in Pakistan.

India ended up playing their own matches in the UAE, whereas their expectation was that other boards will also refuse to play in Pakistan. That didn’t happen.

In the Asia Cup, PCB did what BCCI failed to do in the CT; they forced the whole tournament out of India.

What stopped BCCI and other teams from playing their matches in India with only Pakistan playing their matches in the UAE?
Click to expand...
Sir . you are in denial..your sentence states
Mamoon said:
BCCI got bullied into moving the Asia Cup to India
Click to expand...

That is factually incorrect — it was moved to UAE, not India.
For someone claiming a high IQ, such basic factual errors are unacceptable.

Regarding CT2025
Please provide a single credible source where BCCI stated that "Pakistan is not safe for other countries" or tried to stop other boards from traveling there.
The only consistent position from BCCI was:

India will not travel to Pakistan due to security concerns specific to its team.

That’s it.
It was PCB that publicly kept insisting "the whole tournament will be in Pakistan" and making chest-thumping claims like "We will make India travel to Pakistan", before finally settling for the hybrid model — meaning both India and Pakistan agreed not to travel to each other’s countries.
 
sweep_shot said:
We need a cricket website that is neutral.

Cricinfo and Cricbuzz are practically Indian sites/Indian propaganda mouthpieces. :inti
Click to expand...
Cricinfo use to be a forumn as well. Its comment section was goated and the moderation was top tier.

Before PP I would stay and comment their 24/7 in my younger years.

Now I am not sure if their is even an account creation option, Comments have 100% been removed thats for sure. I think account creation is either for employees or people who wish to write biased and low quality articles which have so many spelling mistakes.

Seriously does no one bother to proof read those articles anymore?

The forumn was also advanced for its time, you could directly reply to people and ping them like you can on PP.

PP is obviously ahead now with the likes features + it's articles and it's ability to create threads + active community but their was a time when PP was seen as the niche community and cricinfo was the best forumn.

Lol cricinfo became MySpace and PP became Facebook :vk2
 
BDfanforever said:
Yes, but all of that becomes moot if they are going to brand themselves as "ESPN Cricinfo" i.e. Global, but 90% of content and coverage is geared toward one type of audience.

They should have separate dedicated website and title it something like "ESPN Indian CricInfo". They are absolutely welcome to post all the WPL, what's on Ashwin's mind, Day in the life of Indian Crickter, etc.
Click to expand...
Cricinfo should published an article about GOAT Santo every week :kp
 
sweep_shot said:
We need a cricket website that is neutral.

Cricinfo and Cricbuzz are practically Indian sites/Indian propaganda mouthpieces. :inti
Click to expand...
What the latest update of parallel ICC run by BCB, PCB and some other board's as you was talking about a year ago ?

Please tell us about latest news about that

:kp
 
BDfanforever said:
Sure, and no one is saying ESPN cannot do that. They absolutely can, just open up another website "ESPN Indian Cricinfo" and load it up al you want. However, here, they are completely misleading rest of their other user base. There are total 610+ Million population across rest of Cricket nations, and currencies in some of those countries are 100x of rupees.
Click to expand...
You can always go to another site. Simple solution. Freedom of choice. Their loss.
 
Markhor said:
This goes back to my earlier point. Cricinfo, unlike other cricket websites, profits from its reputation as the longest running and most definitive online source for world cricket news. Its a pioneer in its field and holds a unique respect amongst fans.

Therefore it has a responsibility to reasonably cover the global game. As stated above, even after switching editions to your preferred region, it's disproportionately Indian centric.

Let's take the NBC News website (not endorsing them, just using as an example). It's a commercial American news outlet. I fully expect an American slant given the overwhelmingly majority of its audience are American. Yet you can find plenty of articles on events from Africa to Asia to South America. I doubt these drive much traffic or generate much revenue - but if you claim to report world news, then report world news.

Cricinfo's coverage of non-Big 3 nations has dwindled to perfunctory match previews and reviews, squad announcements and hirings/firings. I get for most casuals that's enough - but gone are the deep dives, investigative reports or regular long-form interviews that distinguished Cricinfo from the rest.

It doesn't even have a native correspondent for New Zealand, West Indies, Zimbabwe and Afghanistan. NZ literally won the WTC four years ago and regularly competes in ICC finals ! WI have tons of writers and podcasters they could employ. ZIM barely plays any cricket - would it bankrupt Cricinfo to pay a local reporter for a piece every few months ? They cohost the next ODI WC ! AFG are literally the biggest success story of Associate cricket in years, and reached the SF of T20 WC last year. Also voiceless.

Thankfully Cricinfo's monopoly is over and outlets like YouTube, podcasts, forums, and blog spaces are filling the vacuum.
Click to expand...

Always happy to see monopolies disintegrate but I don't think that's the case at all.

If you are a Big 3 supporter , you have plenty of content available both on Cricinfo and elsewhere - Cricbuzz/Cricket.com for India, Wisden, The Cricketer etc. for England .

The competition suggests that there is plenty of demand for quality cricket content in only a few markets.

No matter how many podcasts/forums the non Big 3 nations's supporters come up with , they simply cannot match the quality of content for a couple of reasons.

Hawkeye/Virtual Eye data is expensive unlike football where it is easily accessible.

Only Cricinfo/Cricviz can afford to buy it.

If you are critical of Cricinfo , you should look at the trajectory that Cricviz have taken.

Until 2020, they used to tweet and post articles about series involving non Big3 teams , but since then they have pivoted heavily towards Big 3, ICC tournaments and certain T20 leagues only.

The Cricviz guys are also only paid to write for publications in the Big 3 - Hindustan Times(India), Codesports Australia, Telegraph (UK)

GRC was actually a great platform for Pakistan cricket, in a similar vein to Cricket.com . But their output has reduced dramatically over the last year .

They lost a couple of their analysts (one is working for Quetta Gladiators currently )

They either don't have readership or they aren't able to replace their analysts.

Cricket.com similarly had to replace a couple of their employees but they could do that easily as data analysts are dime a dozen here.
 
chakdeindian said:
Sir . you are in denial..your sentence states

That is factually incorrect — it was moved to UAE, not India.
For someone claiming a high IQ, such basic factual errors are unacceptable.

Regarding CT2025
Please provide a single credible source where BCCI stated that "Pakistan is not safe for other countries" or tried to stop other boards from traveling there.
The only consistent position from BCCI was:

India will not travel to Pakistan due to security concerns specific to its team.

That’s it.
It was PCB that publicly kept insisting "the whole tournament will be in Pakistan" and making chest-thumping claims like "We will make India travel to Pakistan", before finally settling for the hybrid model — meaning both India and Pakistan agreed not to travel to each other’s countries.
Click to expand...
It’s a typo, I hope you are smart enough to know what that means, although I wouldn’t be surprised if you are not.

It is also a sign that you cannot counter my argument. I repeat, and I will repeat for the final time - what stopped BCCI from hosting the Asia Cup in India while PCB played its matches in the UAE?

If you can give a straight answer to this question, be my guest. If you cannot, don’t bother.
 
The maniacal passion of Indians in unmatchable. They have collectively constructed mini mba thesis to defend cricinfo, given advice how to navigate the site and made elaborate defenses to justify its decline. Their appetite to passionately support anything remotely related to India is admirable.

I bet if I threw two sticks into a river and said one stick was Indian, 100 million Indians would congregate on the riverbank extolling the virtues of the stick and cheering deliriously as it floated on by.

We cannot compete here. These qualities are what makes Cricinfo focus it's low-brow content on the Indian market. So just accept it, you won't beat them.
 
Despite 250 million + overseas Pakistanis , it's truly a shame that PAK haven't produced a decent platform for features even on PAK cricket, let alone international cricket.

PAK podcasts and reviews are full of mediocrities like Behram Qazi and their ilk . Even Indian Cricinfo is better at covering PAK cricket .
 
Hellion said:
Despite 250 million + overseas Pakistanis , it's truly a shame that PAK haven't produced a decent platform for features even on PAK cricket, let alone international cricket.

PAK podcasts and reviews are full of mediocrities like Behram Qazi and their ilk . Even Indian Cricinfo is better at covering PAK cricket .
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate on what platform India has produced? They hijacked Cricinfo, didn't produce it.

Maybe Indian Cricket Fans Forum, Star News Match Ka Mujrim and there is clips on TikTok of some Indians sitting on a couch watching cricket and reacting. Pakistanis affectionately call it cartoon Network. I'm struggling to think of anything else.
 
DeadlyVenom said:
Can you elaborate on what platform India has produced? They hijacked Cricinfo, didn't produce it.

Maybe Indian Cricket Fans Forum, Star News Match Ka Mujrim and there is clips on TikTok of some Indians sitting on a couch watching cricket and reacting. Pakistanis affectionately call it cartoon Network. I'm struggling to think of anything else.
Click to expand...

Cricbuzz for one.
 
chakdeindian said:
No one globally cares about Pakistan cricket except Pakistanis..As long as it is showing as priority in pakistan edition, there should not be any concerns..
Click to expand...

Sad but true. I don't know any of the players in their national team except for Babar Azam.
 
Hellion said:
Despite 250 million + overseas Pakistanis , it's truly a shame that PAK haven't produced a decent platform for features even on PAK cricket, let alone international cricket.

PAK podcasts and reviews are full of mediocrities like Behram Qazi and their ilk . Even Indian Cricinfo is better at covering PAK cricket .
Click to expand...

Whining and complaining on online forums is a lot easier no? :inti
 
Hellion said:
Despite 250 million + overseas Pakistanis , it's truly a shame that PAK haven't produced a decent platform for features even on PAK cricket, let alone international cricket.

PAK podcasts and reviews are full of mediocrities like Behram Qazi and their ilk . Even Indian Cricinfo is better at covering PAK cricket .
Click to expand...
The irony is that you are saying this on PakPassion, a forum open to fans from all over the world. Show me one Indian forum that welcomes global fans and actually lets them speak freely on topics like sports, religion and politics. :rabada2

The quality of Indian fans has tanked in the past 15 years. Most are now just arrogant, ego-driven trolls who treat BCCI's money as if it's their own. In reality, if they stood outside BCCI's office with a begging bowl, they wouldn't get even five rupees. Frankly, it's a blessing football is safe from our pathetic fans. :inti
 
Hellion said:
Despite 250 million + overseas Pakistanis , it's truly a shame that PAK haven't produced a decent platform for features even on PAK cricket, let alone international cricket.

PAK podcasts and reviews are full of mediocrities like Behram Qazi and their ilk . Even Indian Cricinfo is better at covering PAK cricket .
Click to expand...
Mesozoic said:
Whining and complaining on online forums is a lot easier no? :inti
Click to expand...
Decent platform? Look at which forumn you are commenting on and how many exclusive interviews and sneak peaks this forumn provides?

Grow up. Good god, how hard is it to be as Mature as me?
 
Mamoon said:
It’s a typo, I hope you are smart enough to know what that means, although I wouldn’t be surprised if you are not.

It is also a sign that you cannot counter my argument. I repeat, and I will repeat for the final time - what stopped BCCI from hosting the Asia Cup in India while PCB played its matches in the UAE?

If you can give a straight answer to this question, be my guest. If you cannot, don’t bother.
Click to expand...
Im smart enough to know it's a typo..but you are not smart enough to identify in first glance and correct it..It was the second time when I quoted, you understood it was a typo..or what if it's not?..I won't be surprised as you are from the land of Umar Akmal and rizwan..

The simple answer for your question is logistics and budget constraints..If you are really smart, you would not have asked this question on first hand,but but but..
 
Bhaag Viru Bhaag said:
The irony is that you are saying this on PakPassion, a forum open to fans from all over the world. Show me one Indian forum that welcomes global fans and actually lets them speak freely on topics like sports, religion and politics. :rabada2

The quality of Indian fans has tanked in the past 15 years. Most are now just arrogant, ego-driven trolls who treat BCCI's money as if it's their own. In reality, if they stood outside BCCI's office with a begging bowl, they wouldn't get even five rupees. Frankly, it's a blessing football is safe from our pathetic fans. :inti
Click to expand...
Irony is lost on nincompoops who don't know the difference between a fan forum and outlets like cricinfo/cricbuzz
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FearlessRoar
Holding the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 final in Dubai if India qualifies would be a 'blatant robbery' of Pakistan cricket fans' moment
2 3 4
Replies
282
Views
13K
sweep_shot
sweep_shot
Bhaijaan
What’s with desi people’s obsession of attending the Wimbledon?
2
Replies
132
Views
3K
Bhaijaan
Bhaijaan
The Bald Eagle
[EXCLUSIVE] "West Indies fans identify very closely with Pakistan": Fazeer Mohammed
Replies
4
Views
354
Inswinging Yorker
I
Suleiman
How to revive cricket after its death at the hands of India in Champions Trophy 2025 Final? What must be done?
2
Replies
122
Views
5K
Shehmir
S
BouncerGuy
The overhyped obsession with pace in Cricket
Replies
5
Views
378
Nikhil_cric
N
Back
Top